# wind_farm_dossier_fields

wind_farm_id: 6490
canonical_id: b0c3518b-f4ce-4abf-8fee-46ed76a27b7a
wind_farm_name: Centre-Manche 2
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://centre-manche-energies.fr/fr
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Centre Manche Énergies homepage
source_of_record_url: https://centre-manche-energies.fr/fr
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific authoritative source found that states hub height for Centre-Manche 2, and hub height must not be inferred from a generic turbine platform.


wind_farm_id: 6490
canonical_id: b0c3518b-f4ce-4abf-8fee-46ed76a27b7a
wind_farm_name: Centre-Manche 2
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 8635.0
resolved_source_type: emodnet
resolved_source_name: EMODnet Human Activities
resolved_source_detail: EMODnet Jan 2026
citation_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMODnet Human Activities
source_of_record_type: public data portal
source_of_record_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
source_of_record_licence: Free and open public portal
research_source_name: Eoliennes en mer FAQ
research_source_type: government consultation webpage
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Current web sources do not confirm a final turbine count. Consultation-stage state material said the project would likely comprise between 75 and 125 fixed-bottom turbines, and another state Q&A gave illustrative scenarios including 100 × 15 MW, 125 × 12 MW, or 75 × 20 MW. That does not align with the database validation hint of 0; the likely reason is that EMODnet’s count is a placeholder for an unselected concept-stage layout rather than a real final count.

research_source_url:
https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/facades-maritimes-en-france/facade-manche-mer-du-nord/projet-centre-manche-2/concertation-prealable/faq


wind_farm_id: 6490
canonical_id: b0c3518b-f4ce-4abf-8fee-46ed76a27b7a
wind_farm_name: Centre-Manche 2
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Fixed-bottom foundations
resolved_value: Fixed-bottom foundations
research_value: Fixed-bottom foundations
resolved_fact_id: 42504.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://centre-manche-energies.fr/fr/localisation-geographique
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Centre Manche Énergies - Localisation géographique
source_of_record_url: https://centre-manche-energies.fr/fr/localisation-geographique
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The state and developer both describe Centre Manche 2 as a parc éolien en mer posé; the developer’s location page says average water depth around 45 m allows installation of fondations fixes. No more specific final foundation subtype was confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6490
canonical_id: b0c3518b-f4ce-4abf-8fee-46ed76a27b7a
wind_farm_name: Centre-Manche 2
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.rte-france.com/projets/nos-projets/raccordement-parc-eolien-mer-centre-manche-2
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.rte-france.com/projets/nos-projets/raccordement-parc-eolien-mer-centre-manche-2
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I found evidence of state decisions to proceed with the project and of ongoing studies/concertation, but not a project-specific final construction consent date for the wind farm itself.


wind_farm_id: 6490
canonical_id: b0c3518b-f4ce-4abf-8fee-46ed76a27b7a
wind_farm_name: Centre-Manche 2
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://centre-manche-energies.fr/fr
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Centre Manche Énergies homepage
source_of_record_url: https://centre-manche-energies.fr/fr
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The live developer site says TotalEnergies will continue studies “afin de prendre la décision finale d’investissement début 2029”. That means FID has not yet been taken.


wind_farm_id: 6490
canonical_id: b0c3518b-f4ce-4abf-8fee-46ed76a27b7a
wind_farm_name: Centre-Manche 2
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/01/2033
resolved_value: 01/01/2033
research_value: 01/01/2033
resolved_fact_id: 42505.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://centre-manche-energies.fr/fr
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Centre Manche Énergies homepage
source_of_record_url: https://centre-manche-energies.fr/fr
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The developer page says electricity production should start in 2033; the state page also gives 2033 as the planned commissioning year. Year-only evidence normalized to 01/01/2033.


wind_farm_id: 6490
canonical_id: b0c3518b-f4ce-4abf-8fee-46ed76a27b7a
wind_farm_name: Centre-Manche 2
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/01/2033
resolved_value: 01/01/2033
research_value: 01/01/2033
resolved_fact_id: 42506.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer project page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/facades-maritimes-en-france/facade-manche-mer-du-nord/projet-centre-manche/centre-manche-2

research_summary:
No separate first-power versus full-commissioning milestone was found; both state and developer sources point to 2033 for planned service entry. Year-only evidence normalized to 01/01/2033.


wind_farm_id: 6491
canonical_id: 5b6d4e84-2e5b-4c64-85f8-65a2dc0cdff5
wind_farm_name: Saint-Nazaire
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-saint-nazaire.fr/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Parc éolien en mer de Saint-Nazaire official website
source_of_record_url: https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-saint-nazaire.fr/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Parc éolien en mer de Saint-Nazaire; alternative / historic names: Saint-Nazaire Offshore Wind Farm, Parc du Banc de Guérande

research_value:
Parc éolien en mer de Saint-Nazaire; alternative / historic names: Saint-Nazaire Offshore Wind Farm, Parc du Banc de Guérande

research_summary:
Official project site uses “Parc éolien en mer de Saint-Nazaire”. The project company/legal context also uses Banc de Guérande / Parc du Banc de Guérande, which is a historic/project-company naming variant rather than a different project.


wind_farm_id: 6491
canonical_id: 5b6d4e84-2e5b-4c64-85f8-65a2dc0cdff5
wind_farm_name: Saint-Nazaire
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 42535.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Parc éolien en mer de Saint-Nazaire article
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: EDF Renouvelables / EDF power solutions-led consortium. Current owners: 50% EDF power solutions, 25.5% Enbridge, 24.5% CPP Investments. Operator: EDF power solutions

resolved_value:
Developer: EDF Renouvelables / EDF power solutions-led consortium. Current owners: 50% EDF power solutions, 25.5% Enbridge, 24.5% CPP Investments. Operator: EDF power solutions

citation_url:
https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-saint-nazaire.fr/2026/01/30/une-production-2025-conforme-aux-objectifs/

research_summary:
The freshest ownership source found is the project’s 30/01/2026 article, stating the project is “codétenu à parts égales par EDF power solutions et EIH Sarl (une filiale d’Enbridge Inc. et CPP Investments)”, i.e. 50/50 at the top level between EDF and EIH. Enbridge’s 2024 Annual Report states Enbridge holds 25.5% of Saint-Nazaire; by reconciliation, CPP Investments holds the remaining 24.5% via EIH. The project partners page confirms EDF/Enbridge as project carriers, and EDF group pages show EDF Renewables/EDF power solutions as developer-operator lead.

source_of_record_url:
https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-saint-nazaire.fr/2026/01/30/une-production-2025-conforme-aux-objectifs/


wind_farm_id: 6491
canonical_id: 5b6d4e84-2e5b-4c64-85f8-65a2dc0cdff5
wind_farm_name: Saint-Nazaire
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EDF press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
2012 tender won by EDF-led consortium; 2019 project advanced by EDF Renouvelables and Enbridge; by 23/11/2022 commissioning announced by EDF Renouvelables and EIH S.à r.l. (held by Enbridge and CPP Investments); current ownership reconciles to 50% EDF power solutions / 25.5% Enbridge / 24.5% CPP Investments

research_value:
2012 tender won by EDF-led consortium; 2019 project advanced by EDF Renouvelables and Enbridge; by 23/11/2022 commissioning announced by EDF Renouvelables and EIH S.à r.l. (held by Enbridge and CPP Investments); current ownership reconciles to 50% EDF power solutions / 25.5% Enbridge / 24.5% CPP Investments

citation_url:
https://www.edf.fr/groupe-edf/espaces-dedies/journalistes/tous-les-communiques-de-presse/mise-en-service-complete-du-premier-parc-eolien-en-mer-de-france

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on for current structure is 30/01/2026 on the project site; it confirms equal co-ownership between EDF power solutions and EIH Sarl. EDF’s 23/11/2022 commissioning release confirms EIH S.à r.l. is held by Enbridge and CPP Investments. Enbridge’s 2024 Annual Report provides the dated current Enbridge stake of 25.5%, allowing the full partnership to reconcile.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.edf.fr/groupe-edf/espaces-dedies/journalistes/tous-les-communiques-de-presse/mise-en-service-complete-du-premier-parc-eolien-en-mer-de-france


wind_farm_id: 6491
canonical_id: 5b6d4e84-2e5b-4c64-85f8-65a2dc0cdff5
wind_farm_name: Saint-Nazaire
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 42536.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EDF commissioning release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.edf.fr/groupe-edf/espaces-dedies/journalistes/tous-les-communiques-de-presse/mise-en-service-complete-du-premier-parc-eolien-en-mer-de-france

research_summary:
The official project homepage and EDF’s commissioning release show the wind farm has been in service since November 2022. Recent project pages discuss ongoing production and O&M activity, confirming operational status rather than construction or decommissioning.


wind_farm_id: 6491
canonical_id: 5b6d4e84-2e5b-4c64-85f8-65a2dc0cdff5
wind_farm_name: Saint-Nazaire
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 480 MW
resolved_value: 480 MW
research_value: 480 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42537.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-saint-nazaire.fr/le-parc-eolien-en-mer/presentation-projet/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Project presentation page
source_of_record_url: https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-saint-nazaire.fr/le-parc-eolien-en-mer/presentation-projet/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Consistently stated by the project site, EDF, and RTE as 80 turbines × 6 MW = 480 MW installed capacity.


wind_farm_id: 6491
canonical_id: 5b6d4e84-2e5b-4c64-85f8-65a2dc0cdff5
wind_farm_name: Saint-Nazaire
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 480 MW
resolved_value: 480 MW
research_value: 480 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42538.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.rte-france.com/actualites/parc-eolien-mer-saint-nazaire-travaux-raccordement-demarrent
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE connection works announcement
source_of_record_url: https://www.rte-france.com/actualites/parc-eolien-mer-saint-nazaire-travaux-raccordement-demarrent
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No openly accessible source clearly labels a distinct project MEC figure. Web evidence repeatedly confirms 480 MW installed/exported project power, while RTE describes the dedicated 225 kV export connection. I therefore use 480 MW as the best-supported practical export capacity value, but note this is evidenced as installed/connected project capacity rather than a separately labeled MEC parameter.


wind_farm_id: 6491
canonical_id: 5b6d4e84-2e5b-4c64-85f8-65a2dc0cdff5
wind_farm_name: Saint-Nazaire
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: GE Haliade 150-6MW
resolved_value: GE Haliade 150-6MW
research_value: GE Haliade 150-6MW
resolved_fact_id: 42539.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GE press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.ge.com/news/press-releases/ge-renewable-energy-edf-renewables-enbridge-celebrating-first-nacelle-french-offshore-windfarm-saint-nazaire

research_summary:
GE explicitly ties the Haliade 150-6MW series to Saint-Nazaire, and multiple project-specific sources state 80 turbines at 6 MW supplied by GE. This matches the linked EuroWindWakes fallback, so no cross-project inference was needed.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.ge.com/news/press-releases/ge-renewable-energy-edf-renewables-enbridge-celebrating-first-nacelle-french-offshore-windfarm-saint-nazaire


wind_farm_id: 6491
canonical_id: 5b6d4e84-2e5b-4c64-85f8-65a2dc0cdff5
wind_farm_name: Saint-Nazaire
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: GE Energy
resolved_value: GE Energy
research_value: GE Renewable Energy / GE Energy
resolved_fact_id: 9042.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Project actors page
research_source_type: official project website
research_source_url: https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-saint-nazaire.fr/le-parc-eolien-en-mer/les-acteurs/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
The project actors page says General Electric supplies the turbines, and GE’s own release confirms the Saint-Nazaire turbines are Haliade 150-6MW units assembled by GE Renewable Energy.


wind_farm_id: 6491
canonical_id: 5b6d4e84-2e5b-4c64-85f8-65a2dc0cdff5
wind_farm_name: Saint-Nazaire
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 6
resolved_value: 6
research_value: 6 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9352.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Project presentation page
research_source_type: official project website
research_source_url: https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-saint-nazaire.fr/le-parc-eolien-en-mer/presentation-projet/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
The official project presentation states a unit capacity of 6 MW, corroborated by GE’s Saint-Nazaire nacelle release.


wind_farm_id: 6491
canonical_id: 5b6d4e84-2e5b-4c64-85f8-65a2dc0cdff5
wind_farm_name: Saint-Nazaire
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 150
resolved_value: 150
research_value: 150 m
resolved_fact_id: 9507.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web evidence on rotor diameter was not clearly accessible in the reviewed official pages. Per the required fallback rule, I used the linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata value of 150 m, which is also consistent with the project-specific GE Haliade 150-6MW model references.


wind_farm_id: 6491
canonical_id: 5b6d4e84-2e5b-4c64-85f8-65a2dc0cdff5
wind_farm_name: Saint-Nazaire
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 100
resolved_value: 100
research_value: 100 m
resolved_fact_id: 9662.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources reviewed did not clearly state a Saint-Nazaire-specific hub height. Under the mandatory fallback rule, I used the linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata value of 100 m and do not infer this from a generic Haliade brochure.


wind_farm_id: 6491
canonical_id: 5b6d4e84-2e5b-4c64-85f8-65a2dc0cdff5
wind_farm_name: Saint-Nazaire
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 80
resolved_value: 80
research_value: 80
resolved_fact_id: 48135.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 80 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Project presentation page
research_source_type: official project website
research_source_url: https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-saint-nazaire.fr/le-parc-eolien-en-mer/presentation-projet/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
The project site, EDF, and RTE all state 80 turbines. This aligns with the non-web validation signals provided: EMODnet hint 80 and EuroWindWakes linked-turbine count 80, so there is no discrepancy to resolve.


wind_farm_id: 6491
canonical_id: 5b6d4e84-2e5b-4c64-85f8-65a2dc0cdff5
wind_farm_name: Saint-Nazaire
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile foundations (drilled XL-monopiles)
resolved_value: Monopile foundations (drilled XL-monopiles)
research_value: Monopile foundations (drilled XL-monopiles)
resolved_fact_id: 42545.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEME press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.deme-group.com/news/deme-offshore-and-herrenknecht-sign-agreement-fabrication-subsea-drill-xl-monopile

research_summary:
The project construction page says the turbines are on monopile foundations. DEME, the foundation contractor, provides stronger technical specificity: Saint-Nazaire used drilled XL-monopile foundations, described as a world first.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.deme-group.com/news/deme-offshore-and-herrenknecht-sign-agreement-fabrication-subsea-drill-xl-monopile


wind_farm_id: 6491
canonical_id: 5b6d4e84-2e5b-4c64-85f8-65a2dc0cdff5
wind_farm_name: Saint-Nazaire
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 18/04/2012
resolved_value: 18/04/2012
research_value: 18/04/2012
resolved_fact_id: 42546.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Project CNDP communication
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-saint-nazaire.fr/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/communiquedecisioncndp-4juillet2012.pdf

research_summary:
An accessible official project PDF and the project’s 07/06/2019 legal update both support that the operating authorisation dates to 18/04/2012. The 2012 project communication states the site was “autorisée à exploiter ce parc par arrêté ministériel en date du 18 avril 2012”, while the 2019 note confirms the Conseil d’Etat later validated that operating permit.

source_of_record_url:
https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-saint-nazaire.fr/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/communiquedecisioncndp-4juillet2012.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6491
canonical_id: 5b6d4e84-2e5b-4c64-85f8-65a2dc0cdff5
wind_farm_name: Saint-Nazaire
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/09/2019
resolved_value: 01/09/2019
research_value: 01/09/2019
resolved_fact_id: 42547.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.mufgemea.com/media/mufg-closes-first-offshore-wind-project-ever-procured-in-france/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: MUFG financial close announcement
source_of_record_url: https://www.mufgemea.com/media/mufg-closes-first-offshore-wind-project-ever-procured-in-france/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official pages reviewed indicate the project moved to financing/final go-ahead after the 07/06/2019 Conseil d’Etat decision and construction launched in September 2019. A precise dated official “FID” page was not clearly accessible, but financial-close and launch sources consistently place this in September 2019; per normalization rule, month-only evidence is rendered 01/09/2019.


wind_farm_id: 6491
canonical_id: 5b6d4e84-2e5b-4c64-85f8-65a2dc0cdff5
wind_farm_name: Saint-Nazaire
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 10/06/2022
resolved_value: 10/06/2022
research_value: 10/06/2022
resolved_fact_id: 42548.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE first power release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.rte-france.com/actualites/parc-eolien-mer-saint-nazaire-premiere-production-francaise-electricite-partir-eoliennes

research_summary:
RTE published a dated release on 10/06/2022 announcing the first electricity production from installed offshore turbines at Saint-Nazaire. EDF’s commissioning release later refers back to first MWh production beginning in early June 2022.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.rte-france.com/actualites/parc-eolien-mer-saint-nazaire-premiere-production-francaise-electricite-partir-eoliennes


wind_farm_id: 6491
canonical_id: 5b6d4e84-2e5b-4c64-85f8-65a2dc0cdff5
wind_farm_name: Saint-Nazaire
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2022-11-01
resolved_value: 2022-11-01
research_value: 23/11/2022
resolved_fact_id: 9817.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EDF commissioning release
research_source_type: owner / developer
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
EDF’s dated press release explicitly announces “mise en service complète” on 23/11/2022. The official project homepage also states November 2022 as the service date.


wind_farm_id: 6492
canonical_id: 24c68bd2-ba39-4a9d-a488-9420b93efd6e
wind_farm_name: Iles d'Yeu et de Noirmoutier
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.oceanwinds.com/projects/noirmoutier-projects/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ocean Winds project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.oceanwinds.com/projects/noirmoutier-projects/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Îles d’Yeu et de Noirmoutier offshore wind farm; project company Éoliennes en Mer Îles d’Yeu et de Noirmoutier (EMYN); alternative form used by owners: Yeu-Noirmoutier

research_value:
Îles d’Yeu et de Noirmoutier offshore wind farm; project company Éoliennes en Mer Îles d’Yeu et de Noirmoutier (EMYN); alternative form used by owners: Yeu-Noirmoutier

research_summary:
Identity is consistent across the official project site, Ocean Winds and French authorities. Official/current operator communications use both “Îles d’Yeu et de Noirmoutier” and “Yeu-Noirmoutier”; these refer to the same EMYN project company rather than a different phase.


wind_farm_id: 6492
canonical_id: 24c68bd2-ba39-4a9d-a488-9420b93efd6e
wind_farm_name: Iles d'Yeu et de Noirmoutier
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 42643.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EDP market notification
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Ocean Winds via EMYN. Current owners: Ocean Winds 40.0%, Sumitomo Corporation 29.5%, Allianz Global Investors 20.25%, Banque des Territoires 9.75%, Vendée Energie 0.5%. Operator: EMYN / Ocean Winds

resolved_value:
Developer: Ocean Winds via EMYN. Current owners: Ocean Winds 40.0%, Sumitomo Corporation 29.5%, Allianz Global Investors 20.25%, Banque des Territoires 9.75%, Vendée Energie 0.5%. Operator: EMYN / Ocean Winds

citation_url:
https://edp.com/en/investors/investor-information/market-notifications/ocean-winds-completes-sale-minority-stake-its

research_summary:
Freshest ownership source is the EDP market notification dated 17/12/2025, which confirms the post-sale cap table after Allianz Global Investors acquired 20.25%. Ocean Winds’ project page confirms the JV partnership but not percentages.

source_of_record_url:
https://edp.com/en/investors/investor-information/market-notifications/ocean-winds-completes-sale-minority-stake-its


wind_farm_id: 6492
canonical_id: 24c68bd2-ba39-4a9d-a488-9420b93efd6e
wind_farm_name: Iles d'Yeu et de Noirmoutier
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMYN May 2024 press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
2014 winner consortium: GDF Suez/ENGIE-led project. By 02/05/2024: Ocean Winds 60.25%, Sumitomo 29.5%, Banque des Territoires 9.75%, Vendée Energie 0.5%. From 17/12/2025: Ocean Winds 40.0%, Allianz Global Investors 20.25%, Sumitomo 29.5%, Banque des Territoires 9.75%, Vendée Energie 0.5%

research_value:
2014 winner consortium: GDF Suez/ENGIE-led project. By 02/05/2024: Ocean Winds 60.25%, Sumitomo 29.5%, Banque des Territoires 9.75%, Vendée Energie 0.5%. From 17/12/2025: Ocean Winds 40.0%, Allianz Global Investors 20.25%, Sumitomo 29.5%, Banque des Territoires 9.75%, Vendée Energie 0.5%

citation_url:
https://iles-yeu-noirmoutier.eoliennes-mer.fr/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2024/10/CPInaugurationOSS2052024-EN.pdf

research_summary:
Freshest source is the EDP notice dated 17/12/2025. The EMYN press release dated 02/05/2024 confirms the pre-Allianz structure. This reconciles the current full partnership and avoids inferring ownership from a single partner page.

source_of_record_url:
https://iles-yeu-noirmoutier.eoliennes-mer.fr/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2024/10/CPInaugurationOSS2052024-EN.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6492
canonical_id: 24c68bd2-ba39-4a9d-a488-9420b93efd6e
wind_farm_name: Iles d'Yeu et de Noirmoutier
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 42644.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMYN project announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://iles-yeu-noirmoutier.eoliennes-mer.fr/2026/04/29/emyn-annonce-la-pose-de-sa-derniere-eolienne-et-la-mise-en-service-du-parc-eolien/

research_summary:
The clearest current project-specific source is EMYN’s 29/04/2026 announcement stating the final turbine was installed and the project “enters operation / is fully in activity.” Earlier RTE material from 04/03/2025 still described commissioning ahead, so the project has moved beyond under-construction status.

source_of_record_url:
https://iles-yeu-noirmoutier.eoliennes-mer.fr/2026/04/29/emyn-annonce-la-pose-de-sa-derniere-eolienne-et-la-mise-en-service-du-parc-eolien/


wind_farm_id: 6492
canonical_id: 24c68bd2-ba39-4a9d-a488-9420b93efd6e
wind_farm_name: Iles d'Yeu et de Noirmoutier
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 488 MW
resolved_value: 488 MW
research_value: 488 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42645.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.oceanwinds.com/projects/noirmoutier-projects/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ocean Winds project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.oceanwinds.com/projects/noirmoutier-projects/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Ocean Winds currently states 488 MW. EMYN’s own April 2026 announcement states 500 MW, while older project material and RTE often use 61 × 8 MW / 488 MW or “nearly 500 MW”. Given project-specific owner page consistency and grid/operator reporting around 61 turbines of 8 MW, 488 MW is the most conservative confirmed value; some newer owner/investor pages appear to round or reflect an 8.2 MW commercial description.


wind_farm_id: 6492
canonical_id: 24c68bd2-ba39-4a9d-a488-9420b93efd6e
wind_farm_name: Iles d'Yeu et de Noirmoutier
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE project page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.rte-france.com/projets/nos-projets/raccordement-du-parc-eolien-en-mer-des-iles-dyeu-et-de-noirmoutier

research_summary:
No openly accessible project-specific source found that explicitly states a distinct MEC/export limit in MW. RTE confirms 225 kV grid connection infrastructure but not a clearly labeled MEC value.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.rte-france.com/projets/nos-projets/raccordement-du-parc-eolien-en-mer-des-iles-dyeu-et-de-noirmoutier


wind_farm_id: 6492
canonical_id: 24c68bd2-ba39-4a9d-a488-9420b93efd6e
wind_farm_name: Iles d'Yeu et de Noirmoutier
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens Gamesa D8 / SG 8.0-167 DD
resolved_value: Siemens Gamesa D8 / SG 8.0-167 DD
research_value: Siemens Gamesa D8 / SG 8.0-167 DD
resolved_fact_id: 42646.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/content/siemens-gamesa/global/en/home/press-releases/siemens-gamesa-renewable-energy-will-deliver-its-d8-platform.html

research_summary:
Project-specific sources confirm Siemens Gamesa’s D8 platform for Yeu-Noirmoutier. A supplier page tied to this site lists SG 8 MW, and industry/project updates describe turbine installation at EMYN using this platform. Treated as confirmed at project level; not inferred from a generic brochure alone.


wind_farm_id: 6492
canonical_id: 24c68bd2-ba39-4a9d-a488-9420b93efd6e
wind_farm_name: Iles d'Yeu et de Noirmoutier
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens Gamesa
resolved_value: Siemens Gamesa
research_value: Siemens Gamesa
resolved_fact_id: 42647.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Confirmed directly by Siemens Gamesa’s project award announcement and by later owner/investor and supplier references to Siemens Gamesa turbines at this project.


wind_farm_id: 6492
canonical_id: 24c68bd2-ba39-4a9d-a488-9420b93efd6e
wind_farm_name: Iles d'Yeu et de Noirmoutier
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 8 MW
resolved_value: 8 MW
research_value: 8 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42648.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.rte-france.com/actualites/raccordement-parc-eolien-mer-entre-iles-yeu-noirmoutier-rte-met-disposition-societe-emyn

research_summary:
Multiple project-specific sources state 61 turbines of 8 MW each. Some later investor material says 8.2 MW turbines / 500 MW, but the more consistently corroborated project-specific evidence remains 8 MW.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.rte-france.com/actualites/raccordement-parc-eolien-mer-entre-iles-yeu-noirmoutier-rte-met-disposition-societe-emyn


wind_farm_id: 6492
canonical_id: 24c68bd2-ba39-4a9d-a488-9420b93efd6e
wind_farm_name: Iles d'Yeu et de Noirmoutier
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 167 m
resolved_value: 167 m
research_value: 167 m
resolved_fact_id: 42649.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://sif-group.com/projects/noirmoutier
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Sif project page
source_of_record_url: https://sif-group.com/projects/noirmoutier
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The accessible project-specific/installation evidence supports the D8/SG 8.0-167 designation. The rotor diameter is therefore confirmed through project-tied model naming rather than inferred from a generic turbine brochure alone.


wind_farm_id: 6492
canonical_id: 24c68bd2-ba39-4a9d-a488-9420b93efd6e
wind_farm_name: Iles d'Yeu et de Noirmoutier
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.oceanwinds.com/projects/noirmoutier-projects/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ocean Winds project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.oceanwinds.com/projects/noirmoutier-projects/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific accessible source located that explicitly gives the as-built hub height for Îles d’Yeu et de Noirmoutier. Per instruction, this is kept as Not confirmed and not inferred from turbine platform alone.


wind_farm_id: 6492
canonical_id: 24c68bd2-ba39-4a9d-a488-9420b93efd6e
wind_farm_name: Iles d'Yeu et de Noirmoutier
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 61
resolved_value: 61
research_value: 61
resolved_fact_id: 42650.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMYN project announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://iles-yeu-noirmoutier.eoliennes-mer.fr/2026/04/29/emyn-annonce-la-pose-de-sa-derniere-eolienne-et-la-mise-en-service-du-parc-eolien/

research_summary:
Current web sources consistently support 61 turbines: EMYN’s 29/04/2026 completion note, RTE’s 04/03/2025 grid update, and the EMYN 02/05/2024 substation release. This differs from the database validation hint of 62, likely because older planning-stage materials and some supply-chain pages reflected an earlier 62-turbine / 496 MW concept before the as-built configuration settled at 61.


wind_farm_id: 6492
canonical_id: 24c68bd2-ba39-4a9d-a488-9420b93efd6e
wind_farm_name: Iles d'Yeu et de Noirmoutier
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopiles
resolved_value: Monopiles
research_value: Monopiles
resolved_fact_id: 42651.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://sif-group.com/projects/noirmoutier
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Sif project page
source_of_record_url: https://sif-group.com/projects/noirmoutier
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current construction-phase sources indicate the project is being built on monopiles, with transition pieces also supplied/installed. Older planning materials mentioned jackets, but the as-built construction campaign is clearly monopile-based.


wind_farm_id: 6492
canonical_id: 24c68bd2-ba39-4a9d-a488-9420b93efd6e
wind_farm_name: Iles d'Yeu et de Noirmoutier
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 12/10/2018
resolved_value: 12/10/2018
research_value: 12/10/2018
resolved_fact_id: 42652.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.vendee.gouv.fr/Actions-de-l-Etat/Energie/Parc-eolien-en-mer-Yeu-Noirmoutier
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vendée state services page
source_of_record_url: https://www.vendee.gouv.fr/Actions-de-l-Etat/Energie/Parc-eolien-en-mer-Yeu-Noirmoutier
source_of_record_licence: Etalab-2.0 / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
An openly accessible Vendée state services page lists the Arrêtés d'autorisation for the Yeu-Noirmoutier project, including the downloadable authorization orders posted under that heading. The repaired source of record is the official Vendée government page rather than the blocked mirror.


wind_farm_id: 6492
canonical_id: 24c68bd2-ba39-4a9d-a488-9420b93efd6e
wind_farm_name: Iles d'Yeu et de Noirmoutier
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 06/04/2023
resolved_value: 06/04/2023
research_value: 06/04/2023
resolved_fact_id: 42653.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ENGIE newsroom
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://en.newsroom.engie.com/news/iles-dyeu-and-noirmoutier-offshore-wind-farm-reaches-final-investment-decision-and-starts-construction-a181-314df.html

research_summary:
ENGIE’s dated press release explicitly announces FID on 06/04/2023. EDP’s later investor notice also references FID in April 2023.

source_of_record_url:
https://en.newsroom.engie.com/news/iles-dyeu-and-noirmoutier-offshore-wind-farm-reaches-final-investment-decision-and-starts-construction-a181-314df.html


wind_farm_id: 6492
canonical_id: 24c68bd2-ba39-4a9d-a488-9420b93efd6e
wind_farm_name: Iles d'Yeu et de Noirmoutier
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/06/2025
resolved_value: 01/06/2025
research_value: 01/06/2025
resolved_fact_id: 42654.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EDP market notification
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://edp.com/en/investors/investor-information/market-notifications/ocean-winds-completes-sale-minority-stake-its

research_summary:
A precise day was not found in accessible primary sources, but EDP’s dated 17/12/2025 notification says “First power was generated in June 2025.” Using the required normalization rule, this is recorded as 01/06/2025.


wind_farm_id: 6492
canonical_id: 24c68bd2-ba39-4a9d-a488-9420b93efd6e
wind_farm_name: Iles d'Yeu et de Noirmoutier
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 29/04/2026
resolved_value: 29/04/2026
research_value: 29/04/2026
resolved_fact_id: 42655.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMYN project announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
EMYN’s dated project announcement says the final turbine installation also marks full commissioning / full entry into operation. This is the clearest project-specific source for full commissioning.


wind_farm_id: 6509
canonical_id: 1efd269b-8f72-4dd2-bd61-035f5dab6826
wind_farm_name: Rentel
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Rentel offshore wind farm; alternative form: Rentel / RENTEL
research_value: Rentel offshore wind farm; alternative form: Rentel / RENTEL
citation_url: https://www.otary.be/en/projects/rentel
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Otary project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.otary.be/en/projects/rentel
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official Otary project page identifies the asset simply as “Rentel”. DEME refers to it as the “Rentel offshore wind farm”, confirming the built Belgian project rather than another phase.


wind_farm_id: 6509
canonical_id: 1efd269b-8f72-4dd2-bd61-035f5dab6826
wind_farm_name: Rentel
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 36178.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.otary.be/en/projects/rentel
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Otary project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.otary.be/en/projects/rentel
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Otary / Rentel NV consortium. Current owners: Not fully confirmed from open current project-specific sources. Operator / daily manager: Otary.

resolved_value:
Developer: Otary / Rentel NV consortium. Current owners: Not fully confirmed from open current project-specific sources. Operator / daily manager: Otary.

research_summary:
Otary states it “coordinated the development, financing and construction” and “now takes care of its daily management”. The freshest dated ownership evidence found is AvH annual report 2024, published in 2025, confirming Green Offshore holds 12.5% in Rentel; however, open current sources located during this search did not reconcile the full present-day ownership cap table to 100%, so the full current owner split is left not fully confirmed rather than inferred.


wind_farm_id: 6509
canonical_id: 1efd269b-8f72-4dd2-bd61-035f5dab6826
wind_farm_name: Rentel
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.eib.org/attachments/press/rentel-press-release-financial-close-en.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EIB financial close release
source_of_record_url: https://www.eib.org/attachments/press/rentel-press-release-financial-close-en.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
01/10/2016: project financed by 8 shareholders in Rentel NV / Otary partnership; at least one current stake independently confirmed is Green Offshore 12.5% (freshest source: AvH annual report 2024, published 2025).

research_value:
01/10/2016: project financed by 8 shareholders in Rentel NV / Otary partnership; at least one current stake independently confirmed is Green Offshore 12.5% (freshest source: AvH annual report 2024, published 2025).

research_summary:
EIB’s 03/10/2016 financial-close release says the project was financed by its 8 shareholders and names the Otary partnership members behind Rentel. For later ownership, the freshest dated open evidence found is AvH annual report 2024 confirming Green Offshore’s 12.5% interest. Because no equally open and recent source found in this search listed all current partners with percentages summing to 100%, the complete current ownership history/split is not fully confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6509
canonical_id: 1efd269b-8f72-4dd2-bd61-035f5dab6826
wind_farm_name: Rentel
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 36179.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.otary.be/en/projects/rentel
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Otary project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.otary.be/en/projects/rentel
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Otary says the wind farm “has been fully operational since late 2018”. Elia’s 28/05/2024 cable-repair release also treats Rentel as an operating wind farm connected to the Belgian offshore grid.


wind_farm_id: 6509
canonical_id: 1efd269b-8f72-4dd2-bd61-035f5dab6826
wind_farm_name: Rentel
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 309 MW export via 220 kV connection to shore
resolved_value: 309 MW export via 220 kV connection to shore
research_value: 309 MW export via 220 kV connection to shore
resolved_fact_id: 36181.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: NKT cable commissioning release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.nkt.com/news-press-releases/nkt-has-delivered-the-high-voltage-cable-system-for-309-mw-offshore-wind-farm-in-belgium

research_summary:
Open sources found confirm a 220 kV export cable to shore, but did not clearly publish a separate regulatory MEC figure. The available project-specific evidence supports using the project’s 309 MW installed capacity as the practical export figure, while noting this is not a separately labelled MEC value.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.nkt.com/news-press-releases/nkt-has-delivered-the-high-voltage-cable-system-for-309-mw-offshore-wind-farm-in-belgium


wind_farm_id: 6509
canonical_id: 1efd269b-8f72-4dd2-bd61-035f5dab6826
wind_farm_name: Rentel
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: SWT-7.0-154
resolved_value: SWT-7.0-154
research_value: SWT-7.0-154
resolved_fact_id: 36182.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.otary.be/en/projects/rentel
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Otary project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.otary.be/en/projects/rentel
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Otary explicitly states “RENTEL wind turbines type SWT 7.0-154”. OffshoreWIND’s 21/12/2016 order report also explicitly ties 42 SWT-7.0-154 turbines to Rentel.


wind_farm_id: 6509
canonical_id: 1efd269b-8f72-4dd2-bd61-035f5dab6826
wind_farm_name: Rentel
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens Gamesa
resolved_value: Siemens Gamesa
research_value: Siemens Gamesa / Siemens
resolved_fact_id: 9044.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EIB financial close release
research_source_type: public lender / project finance press release
research_source_url: https://www.eib.org/attachments/press/rentel-press-release-financial-close-en.pdf
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources tie Siemens to Rentel’s turbine supply. Because the project was contracted before the Siemens Gamesa branding transition, sources variously say Siemens or Siemens Gamesa; these refer to the same OEM lineage for this project.


wind_farm_id: 6509
canonical_id: 1efd269b-8f72-4dd2-bd61-035f5dab6826
wind_farm_name: Rentel
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 7
resolved_value: 7
research_value: 7 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9354.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Otary project page
research_source_type: developer/operator website
research_source_url: https://www.otary.be/en/projects/rentel
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Otary identifies SWT-7.0-154; OffshoreWIND’s order report says 42 SWT-7.0-154 turbines. DEME mentions 7.35 MW because Rentel used high-wind/peak-output operation to reach 309 MW gross plant capacity; for the turbine’s nominal model rating, 7 MW is the project-specific value best tied to the model designation.


wind_farm_id: 6509
canonical_id: 1efd269b-8f72-4dd2-bd61-035f5dab6826
wind_farm_name: Rentel
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 154
resolved_value: 154
research_value: 154 m
resolved_fact_id: 9509.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EIB financial close release
research_source_type: public lender / project finance press release
research_source_url: https://www.eib.org/attachments/press/rentel-press-release-financial-close-en.pdf
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
EIB’s project financial-close release explicitly gives “rotor diameter of 154 meters”; Otary’s project page also identifies SWT-7.0-154 for Rentel.


wind_farm_id: 6509
canonical_id: 1efd269b-8f72-4dd2-bd61-035f5dab6826
wind_farm_name: Rentel
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 106
resolved_value: 106
research_value: 106 m
resolved_fact_id: 9664.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EIB financial close release
research_source_type: public lender / project finance press release
research_source_url: https://www.eib.org/attachments/press/rentel-press-release-financial-close-en.pdf
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
EIB’s 03/10/2016 financial-close release explicitly states “hubheight of 106 meters”. Otary identifies the exact turbine type but does not state hub height; therefore the project-specific authoritative EIB value is used. This also aligns with the linked EuroWindWakes fallback context provided.


wind_farm_id: 6509
canonical_id: 1efd269b-8f72-4dd2-bd61-035f5dab6826
wind_farm_name: Rentel
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 42
resolved_value: 42
research_value: 42
resolved_fact_id: 48158.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 42 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Otary project page
research_source_type: developer/operator website
research_source_url: https://www.otary.be/en/projects/rentel
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Confirmed by Otary, DEME, and the EIB financial-close release. This aligns with the non-web validation context provided: EMODnet hint 42 and linked EuroWindWakes calculated count 42.


wind_farm_id: 6509
canonical_id: 1efd269b-8f72-4dd2-bd61-035f5dab6826
wind_farm_name: Rentel
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile foundations
resolved_value: Monopile foundations
research_value: Monopile foundations
resolved_fact_id: 36188.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.deme-group.com/projects/rentel-offshore-wind-farm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEME project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.deme-group.com/projects/rentel-offshore-wind-farm
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
DEME states the wind turbines are “installed on monopile foundations”; OffshoreWIND’s 21/12/2016 report says the 42 turbines “will be installed on monopile foundations”.


wind_farm_id: 6509
canonical_id: 1efd269b-8f72-4dd2-bd61-035f5dab6826
wind_farm_name: Rentel
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/01/2013
resolved_value: 01/01/2013
research_value: 01/01/2013
resolved_fact_id: 36189.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.otary.be/en/projects/rentel
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Otary project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.otary.be/en/projects/rentel
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Otary says it “acquired the permits for the project in 2013”. A more precise day/month was not found in accessible authoritative sources during this search, so the date is normalized to 01/01/2013 per the requested rule.


wind_farm_id: 6509
canonical_id: 1efd269b-8f72-4dd2-bd61-035f5dab6826
wind_farm_name: Rentel
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 03/10/2016
resolved_value: 03/10/2016
research_value: 03/10/2016
resolved_fact_id: 36190.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.eib.org/attachments/press/rentel-press-release-financial-close-en.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EIB financial close release
source_of_record_url: https://www.eib.org/attachments/press/rentel-press-release-financial-close-en.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Accessible project finance sources do not always label FID separately, but EIB’s 03/10/2016 release confirms financial close on that date and construction start thereafter. For this project, that is the closest exact FID-equivalent milestone evidenced from authoritative open sources.


wind_farm_id: 6509
canonical_id: 1efd269b-8f72-4dd2-bd61-035f5dab6826
wind_farm_name: Rentel
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/06/2018
resolved_value: 01/06/2018
research_value: 01/06/2018
resolved_fact_id: 36191.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.eib.org/attachments/press/rentel-press-release-financial-close-en.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EIB financial close release
source_of_record_url: https://www.eib.org/attachments/press/rentel-press-release-financial-close-en.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
EIB’s 03/10/2016 release says “first power is expected to be injected in the Belgian grid mid-2018”. No accessible authoritative retrospective source found during this search gave a more exact as-built first-export date, so month-level evidence is normalized to 01/06/2018 and should be treated as best available open confirmation rather than a day-exact milestone.


wind_farm_id: 6509
canonical_id: 1efd269b-8f72-4dd2-bd61-035f5dab6826
wind_farm_name: Rentel
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2018-12-01
resolved_value: 2018-12-01
research_value: 01/11/2018
resolved_fact_id: 9819.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Otary project page
research_source_type: developer/operator website
research_source_url: https://www.otary.be/en/projects/rentel
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Otary states construction “resulted in 42 fully operational wind turbines in November 2018” and that the wind farm has been fully operational since late 2018. This is more specific than the “end of 2018” wording in 2016 planning-stage sources, so November 2018 is used and normalized to 01/11/2018.


wind_farm_id: 6510
canonical_id: 12769948-ff60-46c0-9c25-c15316a80088
wind_farm_name: Norther
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Norther
research_value: Norther
citation_url: https://norther.be/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Norther home
source_of_record_url: https://norther.be/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official project name is Norther. Project website describes it as a 370 MW offshore wind farm in the Belgian North Sea; Eneco uses the same name for the operating asset. No separate extension phase was found.


wind_farm_id: 6510
canonical_id: 12769948-ff60-46c0-9c25-c15316a80088
wind_farm_name: Norther
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 36193.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://norther.be/shareholders/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Norther shareholders
source_of_record_url: https://norther.be/shareholders/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developed by Norther NV; current owners: Elicio NV 50% and Eneco Wind Belgium NV 50%; operator: Norther NV

resolved_value:
Developed by Norther NV; current owners: Elicio NV 50% and Eneco Wind Belgium NV 50%; operator: Norther NV

research_summary:
Freshest ownership evidence is the Norther shareholders page dated 16/12/2025 in page metadata, which states Elicio 50% and Eneco 50%. Eneco’s current asset page also says Eneco has 50% and “the other shareholder is Elicio (50%).” Norther home page says Norther “owns and operates” the wind farm, so operator is treated as Norther NV.


wind_farm_id: 6510
canonical_id: 12769948-ff60-46c0-9c25-c15316a80088
wind_farm_name: Norther
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://norther.be/shareholders/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Norther shareholders
source_of_record_url: https://norther.be/shareholders/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Current public web sources confirm the present 50/50 split between Elicio and Eneco; earlier sponsor allocations were not reconfirmed from verifier-safe sources reviewed here.

research_value:
Current public web sources confirm the present 50/50 split between Elicio and Eneco; earlier sponsor allocations were not reconfirmed from verifier-safe sources reviewed here.

research_summary:
Norther’s current shareholder page explicitly states Elicio NV is a 50% shareholder and Eneco is a 50% shareholder. Current public sources reviewed here did not provide a clean verifier-safe route to retain the earlier Boreas/Nethys-era split, so the row is limited to what can be confirmed robustly.


wind_farm_id: 6510
canonical_id: 12769948-ff60-46c0-9c25-c15316a80088
wind_farm_name: Norther
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 36194.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eneco Norther Wind Farm
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.eneco.nl/en/about-us/what-we-do/sustainable-resources/wind/wind-offshore/norther-wind-farm/

research_summary:
Norther home page says Norther owns and operates the wind farm; Eneco says the wind farm “has been operational since June 2019.” Belgian Offshore Platform also states all 9 Belgian offshore wind farms, including Norther, have been fully operational since December 2020. Exact Boundary Layer label: Operational.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.eneco.nl/en/about-us/what-we-do/sustainable-resources/wind/wind-offshore/norther-wind-farm/


wind_farm_id: 6510
canonical_id: 12769948-ff60-46c0-9c25-c15316a80088
wind_farm_name: Norther
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 370 MW
resolved_value: 370 MW
research_value: 370 MW
resolved_fact_id: 36195.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://norther.be/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Norther home
source_of_record_url: https://norther.be/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Norther’s current home page describes the project as a 370 MW offshore wind farm, and the EIB project sheet describes the project as having an estimated capacity of up to 370MW. That rounded figure is retained because it is directly supported by verifier-safe current sources.


wind_farm_id: 6510
canonical_id: 12769948-ff60-46c0-9c25-c15316a80088
wind_farm_name: Norther
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://norther.be/key-components/offshore-high-voltage-station/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Norther offshore high voltage station
source_of_record_url: https://norther.be/key-components/offshore-high-voltage-station/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Public web sources consistently confirm installed capacity around 369.6/370 MW, but no accessible project-specific source reviewed explicitly labels a separate maximum export capacity / MEC value. To avoid conflating gross installed capacity with export capacity, this remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6510
canonical_id: 12769948-ff60-46c0-9c25-c15316a80088
wind_farm_name: Norther
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: V164-8.0 MW
resolved_value: V164-8.0 MW
research_value: V164-8.0 MW
resolved_fact_id: 36196.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Eneco’s project page explicitly says “44 wind turbines of the type V164-8.0 MW.” Norther’s current turbine page says “Vestas Turbine V164” but not the suffix. Because project-specific sources are slightly mixed between generic V164 wording and 8.4 MW output wording, the linked EuroWindWakes project-turbine metadata was used as the required fallback for the exact model suffix, giving V164-8.0 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6510
canonical_id: 12769948-ff60-46c0-9c25-c15316a80088
wind_farm_name: Norther
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas
resolved_value: Vestas
research_value: Vestas
resolved_fact_id: 9045.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Norther turbine page
research_source_type: official project website
research_source_url: https://norther.be/key-components/turbine/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Norther’s turbine page says the wind farm uses 44 Vestas V164 turbines, built by Danish company Vestas. Eneco’s project page also identifies the V164-8.0 MW turbine type, consistent with Vestas as OEM.


wind_farm_id: 6510
canonical_id: 12769948-ff60-46c0-9c25-c15316a80088
wind_farm_name: Norther
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 8
resolved_value: 8
research_value: 8.0 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9355.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Eneco explicitly states V164-8.0 MW. Norther’s current turbine page says each turbine can produce up to 8.4 MW, while official construction-era releases also used 8.4 MW. Because current project-specific web evidence is inconsistent on exact unit rating, the linked EuroWindWakes project-turbine metadata was used as the required fallback for the chosen value: 8.0 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6510
canonical_id: 12769948-ff60-46c0-9c25-c15316a80088
wind_farm_name: Norther
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 164
resolved_value: 164
research_value: 164 m
resolved_fact_id: 9510.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Norther turbine page
research_source_type: official project website
research_source_url: https://norther.be/key-components/turbine/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Norther’s turbine page explicitly states “Rotor diameter: 164 meters.” This matches the linked EuroWindWakes project-turbine metadata, so the value is well aligned.


wind_farm_id: 6510
canonical_id: 12769948-ff60-46c0-9c25-c15316a80088
wind_farm_name: Norther
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 105
resolved_value: 105
research_value: 105 m
resolved_fact_id: 9665.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific web source reviewed explicitly confirmed hub height. Per the required fallback rule, the linked EuroWindWakes project-turbine metadata was used for this turbine-specific field: 105 m.


wind_farm_id: 6510
canonical_id: 12769948-ff60-46c0-9c25-c15316a80088
wind_farm_name: Norther
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 44
resolved_value: 44
research_value: 44
resolved_fact_id: 48159.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 44 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Norther home
research_source_type: official project website
research_source_url: https://norther.be/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Norther home page and turbine page both state 44 turbines; Eneco says Norther consists of 44 wind turbines. This aligns with the provided non-web validation signals showing 44 linked turbines and an EMODnet hint of 44, so there is no count conflict to resolve.


wind_farm_id: 6510
canonical_id: 12769948-ff60-46c0-9c25-c15316a80088
wind_farm_name: Norther
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile
resolved_value: Monopile
research_value: Monopile
resolved_fact_id: 36202.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://norther.be/key-components/monopile-foundation/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Norther monopile foundation page
source_of_record_url: https://norther.be/key-components/monopile-foundation/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Norther’s foundation page explicitly says “Norther chose a monopile foundation.” Norther’s current navigation and content are project-specific, and an additional official-source cross-check exists in older project descriptions and widely repeated project summaries.


wind_farm_id: 6510
canonical_id: 12769948-ff60-46c0-9c25-c15316a80088
wind_farm_name: Norther
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eib.org/en/projects/all/20150871
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EIB project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.eib.org/en/projects/all/20150871
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Public verifier-safe sources reviewed here confirm the environmental permit was granted in 2011, but they do not provide a stable accessible month/day citation for the exact consent date. The report therefore drops the earlier day-level claim rather than keep an unverifiable date.


wind_farm_id: 6510
canonical_id: 12769948-ff60-46c0-9c25-c15316a80088
wind_farm_name: Norther
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/03/2019
resolved_value: 01/03/2019
research_value: 01/03/2019
resolved_fact_id: 36205.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Windtech first power report
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.windtech-international.com/projects-and-contracts/norther-offshore-wind-farm-delivers-first-power-to-the-belgian-grid

research_summary:
Windtech International published its first-power report on 01 March 2019 and states that the first electricity has been generated by Norther. That is used as the clean verifier-safe public evidence for first power.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.windtech-international.com/projects-and-contracts/norther-offshore-wind-farm-delivers-first-power-to-the-belgian-grid


wind_farm_id: 6510
canonical_id: 12769948-ff60-46c0-9c25-c15316a80088
wind_farm_name: Norther
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2019-06-01
resolved_value: 2019-06-01
research_value: 01/06/2019
resolved_fact_id: 9820.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Eneco states the wind farm “has been operational since June 2019.” The linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata gives commissioning date 01/06/2019. Norther’s May 2020 technical-completion notice clearly refers to transition to operational phase after construction close-out/refinancing rather than first full project commissioning, so for the “full commissioning date” row the best fit is 01/06/2019 using month-level operational evidence normalized to the first day of the month.


wind_farm_id: 6511
canonical_id: 6b7ef2e5-3b3a-44f8-a1b3-7362cbd25a63
wind_farm_name: Seamade (SeaStar)
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Seamade (SeaStar)
research_value: Seamade (SeaStar)
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eneco SeaMade project page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.eneco.nl/en/about-us/what-we-do/sustainable-resources/wind/wind-offshore/seamade-wind-farm/

research_summary:
SeaStar is one of the two SeaMade concession zones, alongside Mermaid. Official owner/operator pages describe SeaMade as the combination of Mermaid (235 MW) and Seastar (252 MW), so the assessed phase here is the built SeaStar concession within the operational SeaMade project.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.eneco.nl/en/about-us/what-we-do/sustainable-resources/wind/wind-offshore/seamade-wind-farm/


wind_farm_id: 6511
canonical_id: 6b7ef2e5-3b3a-44f8-a1b3-7362cbd25a63
wind_farm_name: Seamade (SeaStar)
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 36207.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Otary SeaMade construction press pack
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: SeaMade NV / Otary-led JV; Current owners: Otary RS NV 70%, ENGIE Electrabel 17.5%, Eneco Wind Belgium SA 12.5%; Operator: Otary / SeaMade management

resolved_value:
Developer: SeaMade NV / Otary-led JV; Current owners: Otary RS NV 70%, ENGIE Electrabel 17.5%, Eneco Wind Belgium SA 12.5%; Operator: Otary / SeaMade management

citation_url:
https://www.otary.be/en/downloadcenter/download/start-offshore-construction-activities-of-the-final-and-largest-offshore-wind-farm-ever-built-in-the-belgian-north-sea

research_summary:
Otary’s project materials and Eneco’s project page reconcile the ownership split to 100%. Freshest source date relied on for current ownership is the live Eneco project page crawled today; the Otary project page and Otary project documents support the same structure. Otary states it and its partners manage the wind farm.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.otary.be/en/downloadcenter/download/start-offshore-construction-activities-of-the-final-and-largest-offshore-wind-farm-ever-built-in-the-belgian-north-sea


wind_farm_id: 6511
canonical_id: 6b7ef2e5-3b3a-44f8-a1b3-7362cbd25a63
wind_farm_name: Seamade (SeaStar)
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Otary merger announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
24/03/2010: original SeaStar concession awarded to Seastar consortium; 01/07/2018: Mermaid and Seastar merged into SeaMade NV; current split remains Otary 70%, ENGIE 17.5%, Eneco 12.5%

research_value:
24/03/2010: original SeaStar concession awarded to Seastar consortium; 01/07/2018: Mermaid and Seastar merged into SeaMade NV; current split remains Otary 70%, ENGIE 17.5%, Eneco 12.5%

citation_url:
https://www.otary.be/en/news/detail/ostend-be-mermaid-and-seastar-joint-venture-is-a-fact-seamade-nv-takes-a-head-start

research_summary:
SeaStar started as a standalone concession. Otary’s merger announcement states SeaMade NV became responsible for both Mermaid and Seastar, with the post-merger share split 70/17.5/12.5. Freshest source date relied on for the current split is the live Eneco project page; historical merger structure is from Otary’s 2018 announcement.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.otary.be/en/news/detail/ostend-be-mermaid-and-seastar-joint-venture-is-a-fact-seamade-nv-takes-a-head-start


wind_farm_id: 6511
canonical_id: 6b7ef2e5-3b3a-44f8-a1b3-7362cbd25a63
wind_farm_name: Seamade (SeaStar)
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 36208.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.otary.be/en/projects/seamade
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Otary SeaMade project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.otary.be/en/projects/seamade
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The SeaMade project page says the wind farm, consisting of Seastar and Mermaid, is fully operational since end-2020; Eneco repeats that SeaMade has been fully operational since the end of 2020. For the SeaStar phase specifically, Elia confirmed Seastar’s grid connection on 29/05/2020 and said the farms were then starting up one by one ahead of late-2020 full operation.


wind_farm_id: 6511
canonical_id: 6b7ef2e5-3b3a-44f8-a1b3-7362cbd25a63
wind_farm_name: Seamade (SeaStar)
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 252 MW
resolved_value: 252 MW
research_value: 252 MW
resolved_fact_id: 36209.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Borealis Seastar PPA news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.borealisgroup.com/news/borealis-and-eneco-sign-new-power-purchase-agreement-ppa-for-renewable-electricity-from-offshore-wind-farm-seastar-part-of-the-seamade-complex

research_summary:
Multiple project-specific sources distinguish SeaStar from Mermaid and give SeaStar’s concession capacity as 252 MW. This matches the provided validation context.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.borealisgroup.com/news/borealis-and-eneco-sign-new-power-purchase-agreement-ppa-for-renewable-electricity-from-offshore-wind-farm-seastar-part-of-the-seamade-complex


wind_farm_id: 6511
canonical_id: 6b7ef2e5-3b3a-44f8-a1b3-7362cbd25a63
wind_farm_name: Seamade (SeaStar)
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Otary SeaMade construction press pack
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.otary.be/en/downloadcenter/download/start-offshore-construction-activities-of-the-final-and-largest-offshore-wind-farm-ever-built-in-the-belgian-north-sea

research_summary:
Project-specific open sources clearly state SeaStar’s installed capacity at 252 MW and describe its dedicated offshore substation/export connection, but I did not find an openly accessible project-specific source that explicitly states a separate MEC figure for the SeaStar concession. SeaMade construction materials note two 220-245 kV export cables for the two-wind-farm project, and Otary’s substation note says the SeaStar/Mermaid substations export to Elia’s offshore grid, but no explicit SeaStar MEC value was published on the accessible sources reviewed.


wind_farm_id: 6511
canonical_id: 6b7ef2e5-3b3a-44f8-a1b3-7362cbd25a63
wind_farm_name: Seamade (SeaStar)
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: SG 8.0-167 DD
resolved_value: SG 8.0-167 DD
research_value: SG 8.0-167 DD
resolved_fact_id: 36210.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Otary’s construction release explicitly says Seastar will install 30 Siemens Gamesa turbines of type SG-8.0-167. The linked EuroWindWakes row gives the more specific full model name SG 8.0-167 DD, which is used here because the project-specific web sources are slightly abbreviated while remaining consistent.


wind_farm_id: 6511
canonical_id: 6b7ef2e5-3b3a-44f8-a1b3-7362cbd25a63
wind_farm_name: Seamade (SeaStar)
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens Gamesa
resolved_value: Siemens Gamesa
research_value: Siemens Gamesa
resolved_fact_id: 9046.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Siemens Gamesa SeaMade order release
research_source_type: OEM press release
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Otary’s construction release and Siemens Gamesa’s project order release both tie Siemens Gamesa directly to SeaMade/SeaStar.


wind_farm_id: 6511
canonical_id: 6b7ef2e5-3b3a-44f8-a1b3-7362cbd25a63
wind_farm_name: Seamade (SeaStar)
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 8
resolved_value: 8
research_value: 8 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9356.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Siemens Gamesa SeaMade order release
research_source_type: OEM press release
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific sources confirm Seastar uses SG 8.0-167 turbines. Otary’s construction release says “58 SGRE 8,0 MW offshore wind turbines” and Siemens Gamesa’s SeaMade order release states the SG 8.0-167 DD turbine has a rated capacity of 8.0 MW. Otary also mentions power boost up to 8.4 MW, but the rated power remains 8 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6511
canonical_id: 6b7ef2e5-3b3a-44f8-a1b3-7362cbd25a63
wind_farm_name: Seamade (SeaStar)
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 167
resolved_value: 167
research_value: 167 m
resolved_fact_id: 9511.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Otary SeaMade construction press pack
research_source_type: developer PDF
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Otary’s SeaMade construction release and Eneco’s SeaMade facts page both give a 167 m rotor diameter for the project turbines used at SeaStar.


wind_farm_id: 6511
canonical_id: 6b7ef2e5-3b3a-44f8-a1b3-7362cbd25a63
wind_farm_name: Seamade (SeaStar)
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 109
resolved_value: 109
research_value: 109 m
resolved_fact_id: 9666.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Otary’s project-specific construction release gives “Height wind turbine at hub: 109 mLAT”. This aligns with the linked EuroWindWakes fallback row, which gives 109 m. Because project-specific corroboration is limited, Otary is treated as the primary accessible source and EuroWindWakes as confirming fallback context.


wind_farm_id: 6511
canonical_id: 6b7ef2e5-3b3a-44f8-a1b3-7362cbd25a63
wind_farm_name: Seamade (SeaStar)
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 30
resolved_value: 30
research_value: 30
resolved_fact_id: 48160.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 30 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Otary SeaMade construction press pack
research_source_type: developer PDF
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Otary’s construction release explicitly states 28 turbines in Mermaid and 30 in Seastar. This web-sourced figure aligns with all provided non-web validation signals: the database winner candidate, linked EuroWindWakes count, and EMODnet hint all indicate 30.


wind_farm_id: 6511
canonical_id: 6b7ef2e5-3b3a-44f8-a1b3-7362cbd25a63
wind_farm_name: Seamade (SeaStar)
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile foundations
resolved_value: Monopile foundations
research_value: Monopile foundations
resolved_fact_id: 36216.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.offshorewind.biz/2018/12/03/seamade-completes-financial-close/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Offshore Wind SeaMade financial close report
source_of_record_url: https://www.offshorewind.biz/2018/12/03/seamade-completes-financial-close/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
A project finance/construction summary and secondary project coverage both state SeaMade uses monopile foundations. I did not find a newer dedicated official page explicitly restating the foundation type for SeaStar only, but the value is tied to the SeaMade project being built as Mermaid + SeaStar.


wind_farm_id: 6511
canonical_id: 6b7ef2e5-3b3a-44f8-a1b3-7362cbd25a63
wind_farm_name: Seamade (SeaStar)
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/06/2012
resolved_value: 01/06/2012
research_value: 01/06/2012
resolved_fact_id: 36217.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.eib.org/attachments/registers/88154340.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SeaStar EIA document
source_of_record_url: https://www.eib.org/attachments/registers/88154340.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project EIA document states that on 01/06/2012 the FPS Economy granted a domain concession to THV SeaStar. That is the clearest accessible dated consent-type milestone found for SeaStar. Older sector summaries also record Seastar concession timing, though some refer to the earlier 24/03/2010 concession-rights award before later permitting/regranting steps; I therefore prefer the explicit 01/06/2012 ministerial-decree wording from the project EIA.


wind_farm_id: 6511
canonical_id: 6b7ef2e5-3b3a-44f8-a1b3-7362cbd25a63
wind_farm_name: Seamade (SeaStar)
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 03/12/2018
resolved_value: 03/12/2018
research_value: 03/12/2018
resolved_fact_id: 36218.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.offshorewind.biz/2018/12/03/seamade-completes-financial-close/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Offshore Wind SeaMade financial close report
source_of_record_url: https://www.offshorewind.biz/2018/12/03/seamade-completes-financial-close/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
SeaMade’s financial close was announced on 03/12/2018 and is the clearest accessible FID-equivalent milestone for the merged project that built SeaStar. An openly accessible contemporaneous industry report states SeaMade “reached financial close today, 3 December,” which is used here as the replacement source-of-record.


wind_farm_id: 6511
canonical_id: 6b7ef2e5-3b3a-44f8-a1b3-7362cbd25a63
wind_farm_name: Seamade (SeaStar)
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 02/07/2020
resolved_value: 02/07/2020
research_value: 02/07/2020
resolved_fact_id: 36219.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.offshorewind.biz/2020/07/02/seamade-produces-first-power/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Offshore Wind SeaMade first power report
source_of_record_url: https://www.offshorewind.biz/2020/07/02/seamade-produces-first-power/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The clearest accessible first-power milestone I found is the project-level SeaMade announcement reported on 02/07/2020 that the first turbine had begun producing power. I did not find an open source isolating SeaStar-only first power separate from Mermaid, so the project first-power date is used as the closest relevant milestone for the built merged project.


wind_farm_id: 6511
canonical_id: 6b7ef2e5-3b3a-44f8-a1b3-7362cbd25a63
wind_farm_name: Seamade (SeaStar)
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2020-12-01
resolved_value: 2020-12-01
research_value: 01/12/2020
resolved_fact_id: 9821.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Otary and Eneco both say SeaMade was fully operational by the end of 2020. The linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata gives SeaStar commissioning date 01/12/2020, which is used here as the required fallback because project-specific web sources confirm end-2020 operation but do not provide a sharper SeaStar-only commissioning day.


wind_farm_id: 6512
canonical_id: f324ddba-160a-4855-821e-adc3f683788b
wind_farm_name: Northwester 2
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Northwester 2
research_value: Northwester 2
citation_url: https://parkwind.eu/projects/northwester-2
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Parkwind project page
source_of_record_url: https://parkwind.eu/projects/northwester-2
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific sources consistently identify the asset as Northwester 2 in the Belgian North Sea; no stronger evidence of a materially different current operating name was found.


wind_farm_id: 6512
canonical_id: f324ddba-160a-4855-821e-adc3f683788b
wind_farm_name: Northwester 2
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 36221.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://parkwind.eu/news/northwester-2-completes-turbine-installation-of-first-9.5-mw-platform
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Parkwind news release
source_of_record_url: https://parkwind.eu/news/northwester-2-completes-turbine-installation-of-first-9.5-mw-platform
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Parkwind; Current owners: Parkwind 70%, Sumitomo Corporation group 30%; Operator: Parkwind

resolved_value:
Developer: Parkwind; Current owners: Parkwind 70%, Sumitomo Corporation group 30%; Operator: Parkwind

research_summary:
Parkwind states it developed and manages construction/operations; its project and project-news pages identify shareholders as Parkwind (70%) and Sumitomo/Summit Tailwind Belgium (30%). Freshness note: the live Parkwind project page was crawled recently and still presents Northwester 2 as a Parkwind asset, while Sumitomo’s 2024 sustainability report confirms participation since August 2018.


wind_farm_id: 6512
canonical_id: f324ddba-160a-4855-821e-adc3f683788b
wind_farm_name: Northwester 2
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.offshorewind.biz/2017/10/27/parkwind-schedules-northwester-2-financial-close-for-2018/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: OffshoreWIND.biz article
source_of_record_url: https://www.offshorewind.biz/2017/10/27/parkwind-schedules-northwester-2-financial-close-for-2018/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Initially developed by Parkwind with earlier local shareholders; by 2018 Sumitomo entered and the project reached a 70% Parkwind / 30% Sumitomo-group structure that remains the evidenced operating ownership split

research_value:
Initially developed by Parkwind with earlier local shareholders; by 2018 Sumitomo entered and the project reached a 70% Parkwind / 30% Sumitomo-group structure that remains the evidenced operating ownership split

research_summary:
Ownership evolved during development. A 2017 industry report shows an earlier pre-FID shareholder mix; by financial close / construction-stage sources in 2018-2020 and later Sumitomo reporting, the evidenced structure is Parkwind 70% / Sumitomo-group 30%. Freshest dated source relied on for the continuing Sumitomo participation is Sumitomo Sustainability Report 2024; the percentage split itself is clearly stated on Parkwind’s 15/04/2020 project update.


wind_farm_id: 6512
canonical_id: f324ddba-160a-4855-821e-adc3f683788b
wind_farm_name: Northwester 2
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 36222.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.belgianoffshoreplatform.be/en/projects/northwester-2/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Belgian Offshore Platform project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.belgianoffshoreplatform.be/en/projects/northwester-2/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Parkwind says the project was completed in 2020 and the Belgian Offshore Platform says the turbines are operational and produce green energy since 2020. This provides openly accessible current confirmation of ongoing operational status without relying on the blocked Elia page.


wind_farm_id: 6512
canonical_id: f324ddba-160a-4855-821e-adc3f683788b
wind_farm_name: Northwester 2
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 219 MW
resolved_value: 219 MW
research_value: 219 MW
resolved_fact_id: 36223.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://parkwind.eu/projects/northwester-2
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Parkwind project page
source_of_record_url: https://parkwind.eu/projects/northwester-2
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Parkwind and Belgian Offshore Platform both state 219 MW. This also aligns with the provided validation context and with project-construction news.


wind_farm_id: 6512
canonical_id: f324ddba-160a-4855-821e-adc3f683788b
wind_farm_name: Northwester 2
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eib.org/en/projects/all/20170897
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: European Investment Bank project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.eib.org/en/projects/all/20170897
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Publicly accessible project pages clearly confirm installed capacity, but I did not find an openly accessible authoritative page explicitly stating a site-specific MEC value for Northwester 2. Available sources instead describe concession or installed-capacity ranges, which should not be conflated with MEC.


wind_farm_id: 6512
canonical_id: f324ddba-160a-4855-821e-adc3f683788b
wind_farm_name: Northwester 2
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: V164-9.5 MW
resolved_value: V164-9.5 MW
research_value: V164-9.5 MW
resolved_fact_id: 36224.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://parkwind.eu/news/northwester-2-completes-turbine-installation-of-first-9.5-mw-platform
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Parkwind news release
source_of_record_url: https://parkwind.eu/news/northwester-2-completes-turbine-installation-of-first-9.5-mw-platform
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources explicitly tie Northwester 2 to the V164-9.5 MW turbine; Parkwind and Vestas/MHI Vestas both say it was the first commercial deployment of this rating.


wind_farm_id: 6512
canonical_id: f324ddba-160a-4855-821e-adc3f683788b
wind_farm_name: Northwester 2
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas
resolved_value: Vestas
research_value: Vestas
resolved_fact_id: 9047.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Parkwind project page
research_source_type: developer / operator
research_source_url: https://parkwind.eu/projects/northwester-2
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
The current Parkwind project page uses the Vestas 9.5 MW V164 wording; the project was originally supplied under MHI Vestas, now part of Vestas. For a normalized OEM field, Vestas is the clearest current answer, while older project-period sources refer to MHI Vestas.


wind_farm_id: 6512
canonical_id: f324ddba-160a-4855-821e-adc3f683788b
wind_farm_name: Northwester 2
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 9.5
resolved_value: 9.5
research_value: 9.5 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9357.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Parkwind project page
research_source_type: developer / operator
research_source_url: https://parkwind.eu/projects/northwester-2
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Explicitly confirmed for this project by Parkwind, Vestas/MHI Vestas, and Belgian Offshore Platform.


wind_farm_id: 6512
canonical_id: f324ddba-160a-4855-821e-adc3f683788b
wind_farm_name: Northwester 2
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 164
resolved_value: 164
research_value: 164 m
resolved_fact_id: 9512.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Belgian Offshore Platform project page
research_source_type: industry association
research_source_url: https://www.belgianoffshoreplatform.be/en/projects/northwester-2/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Belgian Offshore Platform explicitly states Rotor diameter: 164 m for Northwester 2. A 2025 open PDF describing Parkwind’s Northwester 2 experience and a North Sea Wind prospectus also match the 164 m project figure.


wind_farm_id: 6512
canonical_id: f324ddba-160a-4855-821e-adc3f683788b
wind_farm_name: Northwester 2
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 105
resolved_value: 105
research_value: 105 m
resolved_fact_id: 9667.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources reviewed did not clearly and explicitly state hub height for Northwester 2. Per the required fallback rule, the linked EuroWindWakes 2025 turbine metadata value is used: 105 m.


wind_farm_id: 6512
canonical_id: f324ddba-160a-4855-821e-adc3f683788b
wind_farm_name: Northwester 2
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 23
resolved_value: 23
research_value: 23
resolved_fact_id: 48161.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 23 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Parkwind project page
research_source_type: developer / operator
research_source_url: https://parkwind.eu/projects/northwester-2
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Parkwind and Belgian Offshore Platform both state 23 turbines. This aligns with all provided non-web validation signals: database winner candidate 23, EuroWindWakes linked-turbine count 23, and EMODnet hint 23.


wind_farm_id: 6512
canonical_id: f324ddba-160a-4855-821e-adc3f683788b
wind_farm_name: Northwester 2
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile
resolved_value: Monopile
research_value: Monopile
resolved_fact_id: 36230.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.belgianoffshoreplatform.be/en/projects/northwester-2/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Belgian Offshore Platform project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.belgianoffshoreplatform.be/en/projects/northwester-2/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Belgian Offshore Platform explicitly lists Foundation: Monopile. Parkwind’s experience PDF says the 23 turbines are installed on monopile foundations; Bladt/CS Wind Offshore also confirms contracts for 23 monopiles and transition pieces.


wind_farm_id: 6512
canonical_id: f324ddba-160a-4855-821e-adc3f683788b
wind_farm_name: Northwester 2
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 06/07/2015
resolved_value: 06/07/2015
research_value: 06/07/2015
resolved_fact_id: 36231.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Oriel EIAR Appendix / Parkwind experience PDF
source_of_record_licence: public document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://orielwindfarm-marineplanning.ie/data/files/Environmental%20Documents/Environmental%20Impact%20Assessment%20Report%20%28EIAR%29/-Volume%202A%3A%20Chapters%201%20-%206%20and%20associated%20technical%20appendices/05-11%20Supporting%20Information%20Demonstrating%20the%20Applicant%27s%20Experience%20on%20Other%20Offshore%20Wind%20Farm%20Projects.pdf

research_summary:
The clearest accessible date found is in Parkwind’s experience appendix for Oriel, which lists Environmental Permit Obtained: 6 July ’15 for Northwester 2. EIB project material also indicates an environmental permit existed before financing, supporting that this is a pre-FID consent milestone.

source_of_record_url:
https://orielwindfarm-marineplanning.ie/data/files/Environmental%20Documents/Environmental%20Impact%20Assessment%20Report%20%28EIAR%29/-Volume%202A%3A%20Chapters%201%20-%206%20and%20associated%20technical%20appendices/05-11%20Supporting%20Information%20Demonstrating%20the%20Applicant%27s%20Experience%20on%20Other%20Offshore%20Wind%20Farm%20Projects.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6512
canonical_id: f324ddba-160a-4855-821e-adc3f683788b
wind_farm_name: Northwester 2
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 05/10/2018
resolved_value: 05/10/2018
research_value: 05/10/2018
resolved_fact_id: 36232.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.offshorewind.biz/2018/11/07/mhi-vestas-and-parkwind-seal-northwester-2-deal/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: OffshoreWIND.biz article
source_of_record_url: https://www.offshorewind.biz/2018/11/07/mhi-vestas-and-parkwind-seal-northwester-2-deal/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Financial close is the clearest public proxy for FID here. OffshoreWIND.biz reports the firm order followed financial close achieved on 05/10/2018, and Parkwind’s Oriel appendix shows construction starting the same day, indicating the investment/construction go-ahead.


wind_farm_id: 6512
canonical_id: f324ddba-160a-4855-821e-adc3f683788b
wind_farm_name: Northwester 2
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 14/01/2020
resolved_value: 14/01/2020
research_value: 14/01/2020
resolved_fact_id: 36233.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Parkwind first power news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://parkwind.eu/news/the-northwester-2-offshore-wind-farm-delivers-its-first-green-energy-to-the-belgian-grid

research_summary:
Parkwind announced that Northwester 2 delivered its first green energy to the Belgian grid on 14 January 2020, and a second contemporaneous industry report matches that date.

source_of_record_url:
https://parkwind.eu/news/the-northwester-2-offshore-wind-farm-delivers-its-first-green-energy-to-the-belgian-grid


wind_farm_id: 6512
canonical_id: f324ddba-160a-4855-821e-adc3f683788b
wind_farm_name: Northwester 2
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2020-05-01
resolved_value: 2020-05-01
research_value: 14/05/2020
resolved_fact_id: 9822.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Oriel EIAR Appendix / Parkwind experience PDF
research_source_type: planning document appendix
research_source_licence: public document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Parkwind’s experience appendix gives Operational phase: 14 May ’20 – in operation. Parkwind’s completion announcement in May 2020 confirms the wind farm was completed at that point.

research_source_url:
https://orielwindfarm-marineplanning.ie/data/files/Environmental%20Documents/Environmental%20Impact%20Assessment%20Report%20%28EIAR%29/-Volume%202A%3A%20Chapters%201%20-%206%20and%20associated%20technical%20appendices/05-11%20Supporting%20Information%20Demonstrating%20the%20Applicant%27s%20Experience%20on%20Other%20Offshore%20Wind%20Farm%20Projects.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6528
canonical_id: 9313024b-00e9-40ee-86a0-df3f23f6e3c3
wind_farm_name: Roches Douvres
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: RD (Roches-Douvres)
research_value: RD (Roches-Douvres)
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-memn
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer – concertation continue MEMN
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-memn
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official/current planning sources identify Roches Douvres (RD) or Roches-Douvres as a priority offshore wind zone in the Manche Est–mer du Nord / cross-façade planning context, associated with future AO11 procedures. This supports the target identity as a development zone rather than a commissioned wind farm.


wind_farm_id: 6528
canonical_id: 9313024b-00e9-40ee-86a0-df3f23f6e3c3
wind_farm_name: Roches Douvres
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 42492.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-memn
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer – concertation continue MEMN
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-memn
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: French State / DGEC-led planning process; Current owner(s): Not confirmed; Equity partners and ownership percentages: Not confirmed; Operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: French State / DGEC-led planning process; Current owner(s): Not confirmed; Equity partners and ownership percentages: Not confirmed; Operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
No project company, awarded developer, operator, or reconciled ownership structure was found. The freshest official planning pages dated 20/03/2025 and updated 22/04/2026 still describe Roches Douvres as a State-planned priority zone for future competitive tendering (AO11), not an awarded project with named equity owners.


wind_farm_id: 6528
canonical_id: 9313024b-00e9-40ee-86a0-df3f23f6e3c3
wind_farm_name: Roches Douvres
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-memn
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer – concertation continue MEMN
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-memn
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No ownership history could be substantiated because no awarded project company or transfer history was identified. Freshest relied-on sources are the official planning pages dated 20/03/2025 and 22/04/2026, which still present Roches Douvres as a future tender zone rather than an owned operating asset.


wind_farm_id: 6528
canonical_id: 9313024b-00e9-40ee-86a0-df3f23f6e3c3
wind_farm_name: Roches Douvres
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Development Zone / lease area
resolved_value: Development Zone / lease area
research_value: Development Zone / lease area
resolved_fact_id: 42493.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-memn
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer – concertation continue MEMN
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-memn
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Best fit is Development Zone / lease area. Accessible official sources say Roches Douvres is a “Zone prioritaire à horizon 10 ans” and is “concernée par la ou les procédures de mise en concurrence AO11”; no project-specific consent application, award, FID, or construction has been evidenced. This is more specific than Concept because the zone has been formally selected in ministerial planning, but it is still pre-award.


wind_farm_id: 6528
canonical_id: 9313024b-00e9-40ee-86a0-df3f23f6e3c3
wind_farm_name: Roches Douvres
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2000–3000 MW planned
resolved_value: 2000–3000 MW planned
research_value: 2000–3000 MW planned
resolved_fact_id: 42494.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/politiques-publiques/eolien-mer
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: French ecology ministry – offshore wind page
source_of_record_url: https://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/politiques-publiques/eolien-mer
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Two official sources support a planning-range rather than a fixed single capacity. The ministry page lists 2 to 3 GW; the Government master report says the 506 km² zone would allow 2 to 3 GW, with up to 3 GW possible by 2040 depending on grid studies. This broadly aligns with the database fallback value of 2000 MW, but web sources show a range, not a fixed 2000 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6528
canonical_id: 9313024b-00e9-40ee-86a0-df3f23f6e3c3
wind_farm_name: Roches Douvres
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE investment outlook webinar PDF
source_of_record_licence: public document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://assets.rte-france.com/prod/public/2025-03/2025-03-03-support-webinaire-perspectives-investissement-dans-le-reseau-edition-2025.pdf

research_summary:
No project-specific MEC for RD (Roches-Douvres) was found. RTE documents discuss future offshore network architecture and generic 320 kV / 1.2 GW and 525 kV / 2 GW building blocks for PPE3 portfolios, but they do not explicitly assign a single MEC value to Roches-Douvres itself, so a project MEC should not be inferred.

source_of_record_url:
https://assets.rte-france.com/prod/public/2025-03/2025-03-03-support-webinaire-perspectives-investissement-dans-le-reseau-edition-2025.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6528
canonical_id: 9313024b-00e9-40ee-86a0-df3f23f6e3c3
wind_farm_name: Roches Douvres
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-memn
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer – concertation continue MEMN
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-memn
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No awarded developer or project-specific turbine selection has been published. Accessible official planning sources still show Roches Douvres only as a priority AO11 zone, so turbine model remains unconfirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6528
canonical_id: 9313024b-00e9-40ee-86a0-df3f23f6e3c3
wind_farm_name: Roches Douvres
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-memn
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer – concertation continue MEMN
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-memn
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Not confirmed for the same reason: this is still a planning/tender zone with no awarded project and no project-specific turbine procurement evidence.


wind_farm_id: 6528
canonical_id: 9313024b-00e9-40ee-86a0-df3f23f6e3c3
wind_farm_name: Roches Douvres
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-memn
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer – concertation continue MEMN
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-memn
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific turbine package has been selected or disclosed; accessible official planning sources still describe only a future AO11 zone, so rated power should remain unconfirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6528
canonical_id: 9313024b-00e9-40ee-86a0-df3f23f6e3c3
wind_farm_name: Roches Douvres
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-memn
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer – concertation continue MEMN
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-memn
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific turbine model is confirmed, so rotor diameter cannot be evidenced without improper inference. Accessible official planning pages still treat RD as a future zone only.


wind_farm_id: 6528
canonical_id: 9313024b-00e9-40ee-86a0-df3f23f6e3c3
wind_farm_name: Roches Douvres
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-memn
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer – concertation continue MEMN
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-memn
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific turbine specification is published, and the prompt explicitly forbids inferring hub height from generic turbine platforms. Accessible official planning pages still show only a future AO11 zone.


wind_farm_id: 6528
canonical_id: 9313024b-00e9-40ee-86a0-df3f23f6e3c3
wind_farm_name: Roches Douvres
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 8672.0
resolved_source_type: emodnet
resolved_source_name: EMODnet Human Activities
resolved_source_detail: EMODnet Jan 2026
citation_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMODnet Human Activities
source_of_record_type: public data portal
source_of_record_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
source_of_record_licence: Free and open public portal
research_source_name: Government rapport des maîtres d’ouvrage
research_source_type: government report
research_source_url: https://www.mer.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/2024-10/rapport_mo_mer_en_debat_compressed.pdf
research_source_licence: public document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
No web source provides an RD (Roches-Douvres)-specific turbine count. This differs from the non-web validation signal of 0, but that database hint is likely a placeholder for an unawarded concept/development zone rather than a confirmed as-planned turbine number.


wind_farm_id: 6528
canonical_id: 9313024b-00e9-40ee-86a0-df3f23f6e3c3
wind_farm_name: Roches Douvres
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Bottom-fixed (posed) planned
resolved_value: Bottom-fixed (posed) planned
research_value: Bottom-fixed (posed) planned
resolved_fact_id: 42495.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/politiques-publiques/eolien-mer
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: French ecology ministry – offshore wind page
source_of_record_url: https://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/politiques-publiques/eolien-mer
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official planning sources classify Roches-Douvres technology as “Posé”, i.e. bottom-fixed, but do not confirm a narrower foundation subtype such as monopile or jacket.


wind_farm_id: 6528
canonical_id: 9313024b-00e9-40ee-86a0-df3f23f6e3c3
wind_farm_name: Roches Douvres
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DREAL Normandie newsletter
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://nouvelle-elettre.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/dreal-normandie-eoliennes-en-mer-au-large-de-la/annee-2024-a-2023/la-lettre-no8-decembre-2024/rubrique263.html?lang=fr

research_summary:
No project-specific consent application or consent decision has been found. The relevant dated milestone is ministerial spatial-planning selection on 17/10/2024, but that is not a project consent.

source_of_record_url:
https://nouvelle-elettre.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/dreal-normandie-eoliennes-en-mer-au-large-de-la/annee-2024-a-2023/la-lettre-no8-decembre-2024/rubrique263.html?lang=fr


wind_farm_id: 6528
canonical_id: 9313024b-00e9-40ee-86a0-df3f23f6e3c3
wind_farm_name: Roches Douvres
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/politiques-publiques/eolien-mer
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: French ecology ministry – offshore wind page
source_of_record_url: https://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/politiques-publiques/eolien-mer
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No first-power milestone exists because the project has not yet been awarded or built. Official sources instead give a long-term service horizon of 2040 for the zone.


wind_farm_id: 6528
canonical_id: 9313024b-00e9-40ee-86a0-df3f23f6e3c3
wind_farm_name: Roches Douvres
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/politiques-publiques/eolien-mer
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: French ecology ministry – offshore wind page
source_of_record_url: https://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/politiques-publiques/eolien-mer
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No commissioning date is confirmed. Official planning sources indicate an horizon de mise en service 2040, which is a planning horizon rather than a firm commissioning date.


wind_farm_id: 6541
canonical_id: 01ec942a-4563-4273-a440-a920dd645ed1
wind_farm_name: Gode Wind 3
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 23
resolved_value: 23
resolved_fact_id: 47078.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: unavailable
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
resolved_source_detail:
Calculated from 23 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations (19 linked turbines also fall within another wind farm geometry)


wind_farm_id: 6546
canonical_id: 3db5e5e4-e3da-4f3c-8b83-6e0236619854
wind_farm_name: Trianel Windpark Borkum Phase 1
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 38
resolved_value: 38
resolved_fact_id: 47080.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: unavailable
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
resolved_source_detail:
Calculated from 38 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations (36 linked turbines also fall within another wind farm geometry)


wind_farm_id: 6547
canonical_id: ba1fa98f-4e28-4a49-a244-c6d626d8e880
wind_farm_name: Trianel Windpark Borkum Phase 2
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 46
resolved_value: 46
resolved_fact_id: 47081.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: unavailable
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
resolved_source_detail:
Calculated from 46 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations (46 linked turbines also fall within another wind farm geometry)


wind_farm_id: 6548
canonical_id: e111b67d-decc-4125-ae69-f3ac28efcd5c
wind_farm_name: Meerwind Sued/Ost
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 80
resolved_value: 80
resolved_fact_id: 47082.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: unavailable
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
resolved_source_detail:
Calculated from 80 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations (67 linked turbines also fall within another wind farm geometry)


wind_farm_id: 6551
canonical_id: fbdccda0-0198-4ddb-8e86-d74a4369cdd1
wind_farm_name: Nordsee Ost
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 48
resolved_value: 48
resolved_fact_id: 47083.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: unavailable
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
resolved_source_detail:
Calculated from 48 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations (48 linked turbines also fall within another wind farm geometry)


wind_farm_id: 6554
canonical_id: 31b6e7d8-0ded-4778-9527-30f0ff4c2908
wind_farm_name: EnBW Hohe See
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 71
resolved_value: 71
resolved_fact_id: 47085.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: unavailable
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
resolved_source_detail:
Calculated from 71 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations (71 linked turbines also fall within another wind farm geometry)


wind_farm_id: 6555
canonical_id: 3f76f489-2cb2-43f4-99fc-01bf53ffe9a4
wind_farm_name: Sandbank
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 72
resolved_value: 72
resolved_fact_id: 47086.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: unavailable
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
resolved_source_detail:
Calculated from 72 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations (71 linked turbines also fall within another wind farm geometry)


wind_farm_id: 6556
canonical_id: fd786e4b-5dda-4946-a7a2-756c819f4b95
wind_farm_name: Gode Wind 01
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 55
resolved_value: 55
resolved_fact_id: 47087.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: unavailable
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
resolved_source_detail:
Calculated from 55 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations (47 linked turbines also fall within another wind farm geometry)


wind_farm_id: 6561
canonical_id: 8841165f-1aef-4f11-97c6-ceb5619ee8dc
wind_farm_name: Merkur Offshore (MEG Offshore I)
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 66
resolved_value: 66
resolved_fact_id: 47089.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: unavailable
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
resolved_source_detail:
Calculated from 66 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations (66 linked turbines also fall within another wind farm geometry)


wind_farm_id: 6562
canonical_id: 16304a6d-7098-4da7-8686-ef5fdda7dc42
wind_farm_name: Nordsee One
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 54
resolved_value: 54
resolved_fact_id: 47090.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: unavailable
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
resolved_source_detail:
Calculated from 54 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations (54 linked turbines also fall within another wind farm geometry)


wind_farm_id: 6563
canonical_id: f996e21b-7f6f-4a99-b672-e390f156b2a5
wind_farm_name: Borkum Riffgrund 2
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 56
resolved_value: 56
resolved_fact_id: 47091.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: unavailable
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
resolved_source_detail:
Calculated from 56 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations (56 linked turbines also fall within another wind farm geometry)


wind_farm_id: 6564
canonical_id: 151d7faf-6ec2-400c-976f-9146c2a82f1f
wind_farm_name: Kaskasi II
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 38
resolved_value: 38
resolved_fact_id: 47092.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: unavailable
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
resolved_source_detail:
Calculated from 38 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations (38 linked turbines also fall within another wind farm geometry)


wind_farm_id: 6565
canonical_id: bcc0505a-3977-46a9-9e17-9a097fa84ec6
wind_farm_name: Gode Wind 02
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 42
resolved_value: 42
resolved_fact_id: 47093.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: unavailable
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
resolved_source_detail:
Calculated from 42 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations (42 linked turbines also fall within another wind farm geometry)


wind_farm_id: 6566
canonical_id: f236c214-2d98-482a-89ac-541924b57bb4
wind_farm_name: Veja Mate
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 67
resolved_value: 67
resolved_fact_id: 47094.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: unavailable
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
resolved_source_detail:
Calculated from 67 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations (67 linked turbines also fall within another wind farm geometry)


wind_farm_id: 6583
canonical_id: 31a2bf90-bba0-4d1f-b1c0-a7474d6fc4dc
wind_farm_name: Moray Offshore Windfarm (East)
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.morayeast.com/project
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Moray East project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.morayeast.com/project
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Moray East Offshore Wind Farm; legal/project company name: Moray Offshore Windfarm (East) Ltd; historic context: formed from the earlier Moray Firth Zone / Stevenson, Telford and MacColl consents before the single Moray East consent

research_value:
Moray East Offshore Wind Farm; legal/project company name: Moray Offshore Windfarm (East) Ltd; historic context: formed from the earlier Moray Firth Zone / Stevenson, Telford and MacColl consents before the single Moray East consent

research_summary:
The live project website and Ocean Winds project page both use Moray East for the operating asset. Historic consenting material shows the project evolved from the earlier Stevenson/Telford/MacColl consent structure into a single Moray East consented/built project, which explains legacy naming ambiguity.


wind_farm_id: 6583
canonical_id: 31a2bf90-bba0-4d1f-b1c0-a7474d6fc4dc
wind_farm_name: Moray Offshore Windfarm (East)
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EDPR investor release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Pre-2020/financial close structure: EDPR 43.3%, Diamond Green Ltd 33.4%, ENGIE 23.3%. After Ocean Winds JV formation, Moray East was held by Ocean Winds 56.6%, Diamond Green 33.4%, CTG 10.0%. In 10/2023 Ocean Winds agreed to sell 16.6% to Equitix; current structure is Ocean Winds 40.0%, Diamond Green 33.4%, Equitix 26.6%

research_value:
Pre-2020/financial close structure: EDPR 43.3%, Diamond Green Ltd 33.4%, ENGIE 23.3%. After Ocean Winds JV formation, Moray East was held by Ocean Winds 56.6%, Diamond Green 33.4%, CTG 10.0%. In 10/2023 Ocean Winds agreed to sell 16.6% to Equitix; current structure is Ocean Winds 40.0%, Diamond Green 33.4%, Equitix 26.6%

citation_url:
https://www.edpr-investors.com/en/media/news/edpr-ocean-winds-sale-minority-stake-its-950-mw-moray-east-offshore-project

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on for current structure is the 2024 Moray East Modern Slavery Statement; ownership transition is corroborated by the 02/10/2023 EDPR investor release and the 22/02/2024 Moray East OFTO transaction news, which still referenced the then-existing JV wording around Ocean Winds, DGL and CTG during the transition period. The current ownership percentages reconcile to 100%.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.edpr-investors.com/en/media/news/edpr-ocean-winds-sale-minority-stake-its-950-mw-moray-east-offshore-project


wind_farm_id: 6583
canonical_id: 31a2bf90-bba0-4d1f-b1c0-a7474d6fc4dc
wind_farm_name: Moray Offshore Windfarm (East)
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 100
resolved_value: 100
resolved_fact_id: 47096.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: unavailable
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
resolved_source_detail:
Calculated from 100 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations (1 linked turbines also fall within another wind farm geometry)


wind_farm_id: 6583
canonical_id: 31a2bf90-bba0-4d1f-b1c0-a7474d6fc4dc
wind_farm_name: Moray Offshore Windfarm (East)
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 19/03/2014
resolved_value: 19/03/2014
resolved_fact_id: 21436.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: unavailable
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.highland.gov.uk/download/meetings/id/73029/item_58_-_applicant_moray_offshore_wind_east_limited_1705856s36


wind_farm_id: 6584
canonical_id: a184f26b-4d52-408f-ba21-2af5b56d4598
wind_farm_name: Wave Hub
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Hexicon acquisition release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Wave Hub (current offshore wind use: TwinHub floating offshore wind demonstrator); historic/alternative names include Wave Hub Floating Wind and TwinHub Floating Offshore Wind Project

research_value:
Wave Hub (current offshore wind use: TwinHub floating offshore wind demonstrator); historic/alternative names include Wave Hub Floating Wind and TwinHub Floating Offshore Wind Project

citation_url:
https://storage.mfn.se/b342b0a9-b6ff-494f-b4ec-9ed5ca4c5226/hexicon-completes-wave-hub-ltd-acquisition-for-offshore-floating-wind-technology-demonstrator.pdf

research_summary:
The underlying asset is the existing Wave Hub offshore test site off Hayle, Cornwall. Current wind-project sources describe the wind demonstrator as TwinHub deployed within the existing Wave Hub site; third-party planning/EIA references also call it “TwinHub (Wave Hub Floating Wind Farm)”, resolving the name ambiguity between the legacy site name and the current wind project name.

source_of_record_url:
https://storage.mfn.se/b342b0a9-b6ff-494f-b4ec-9ed5ca4c5226/hexicon-completes-wave-hub-ltd-acquisition-for-offshore-floating-wind-technology-demonstrator.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6584
canonical_id: a184f26b-4d52-408f-ba21-2af5b56d4598
wind_farm_name: Wave Hub
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 33884.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Hexicon acquisition release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Hexicon via TwinHub Ltd / Wave Hub Ltd. Current owner of Wave Hub Ltd: TwinHub Limited. Operator: Wave Hub Limited / project company under Hexicon group. Ownership split: 100% Hexicon-controlled, no external equity split confirmed.

resolved_value:
Developer: Hexicon via TwinHub Ltd / Wave Hub Ltd. Current owner of Wave Hub Ltd: TwinHub Limited. Operator: Wave Hub Limited / project company under Hexicon group. Ownership split: 100% Hexicon-controlled, no external equity split confirmed.

citation_url:
https://storage.mfn.se/b342b0a9-b6ff-494f-b4ec-9ed5ca4c5226/hexicon-completes-wave-hub-ltd-acquisition-for-offshore-floating-wind-technology-demonstrator.pdf

research_summary:
Hexicon’s 30/07/2021 acquisition release says TwinHub Limited acquired Wave Hub Limited from Cornwall Council. UK Companies House PSC data shows TwinHub Limited as the active person with significant control over Wave Hub Limited. Freshest ownership evidence relied on: Companies House data visible in 2026 plus Hexicon Annual Report 2025 published 16/04/2026 confirming the UK sub-group TwinHub arising from the acquisition of Wave Hub Ltd. No reconciled multi-partner ownership percentages were found, so a 100% Hexicon-controlled structure is the best-supported reading.


wind_farm_id: 6584
canonical_id: a184f26b-4d52-408f-ba21-2af5b56d4598
wind_farm_name: Wave Hub
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Originally public-sector/Cornwall-controlled Wave Hub asset; sold to Hexicon/TwinHub in 2021
research_value: Originally public-sector/Cornwall-controlled Wave Hub asset; sold to Hexicon/TwinHub in 2021
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Hexicon acquisition release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Cornwall Council sold the Wave Hub assets to Hexicon’s UK subsidiary TwinHub in July 2021. Freshest source date relied on for historic ownership context: Hexicon Annual Report 2025 published 16/04/2026, which still describes TwinHub as the UK sub-group arising from the acquisition of Wave Hub Ltd.


wind_farm_id: 6584
canonical_id: a184f26b-4d52-408f-ba21-2af5b56d4598
wind_farm_name: Wave Hub
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Consented
resolved_value: Consented
research_value: Consented
resolved_fact_id: 33885.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Mona Offshore Wind Project ornithology appendix
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010137/EN010137-000366-F2.5_Mona_ES_Offshore%20Ornithology.pdf

research_summary:
The database context says Consented, and current web evidence supports that label most closely. TwinHub’s site states the most recent Environmental Statement was in 2018 to make provision for floating wind and that the MMO public register contains the relevant consents; planning/EIA documents from other offshore projects describe TwinHub/Wave Hub Floating Wind as “Consented” and note a marine licence application granted in January 2022 for anchors, moorings and floaters. Although Hexicon impaired the project in January 2026 and sought divestment, those steps do not by themselves prove formal cancellation of the underlying consented project.

source_of_record_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010137/EN010137-000366-F2.5_Mona_ES_Offshore%20Ornithology.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6584
canonical_id: a184f26b-4d52-408f-ba21-2af5b56d4598
wind_farm_name: Wave Hub
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 32 MW
resolved_value: 32 MW
research_value: 32 MW
resolved_fact_id: 33886.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: AR4 results accessible webpage
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence v3.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/contracts-for-difference-cfd-allocation-round-4-results/contracts-for-difference-cfd-allocation-round-4-results-accessible-webpage

research_summary:
Project-specific accessible sources align on 32 MW for the wind demonstrator. The CfD AR4 results page lists TwinHub Floating Offshore Wind Project at 32.00 MW, and supplier/project materials remain consistent with that rating. This appears to be the planned installed capacity for the TwinHub wind phase within Wave Hub, rather than the original wave test-site export rating.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/contracts-for-difference-cfd-allocation-round-4-results/contracts-for-difference-cfd-allocation-round-4-results-accessible-webpage


wind_farm_id: 6584
canonical_id: a184f26b-4d52-408f-ba21-2af5b56d4598
wind_farm_name: Wave Hub
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 48 MW
resolved_value: 48 MW
research_value: 48 MW
resolved_fact_id: 33887.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://gobeconsultants.com/project/wave-hub-test-site/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GoBe Consultants Wave Hub Test Site page
source_of_record_url: https://gobeconsultants.com/project/wave-hub-test-site/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Wave Hub’s wider site/export infrastructure appears to exceed the planned 32 MW turbine installation. Cornwall/MMO-related material indicates the Wave Hub capacity was varied from 20 MW to 48 MW, and MMO marine plan analysis also refers to Wave Hub with a 48 MW maximum export capacity. This is best treated as site/export MEC, distinct from the 32 MW installed wind project.


wind_farm_id: 6584
canonical_id: a184f26b-4d52-408f-ba21-2af5b56d4598
wind_farm_name: Wave Hub
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: MySE 8.0-180
resolved_value: MySE 8.0-180
research_value: MySE 8.0-180
resolved_fact_id: 33888.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Hexicon supplier selection release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://storage.mfn.se/93750b6f-7f4d-4576-b62f-0ddff3408167/hexicon-appoints-mingyang-smart-energy-as-the-preferred-wind-turbine-generator-wtg-supplier-for-their-stepping-stone-floating-wind-project-in-the-uk.pdf

research_summary:
Project-specific supplier-selection material from Hexicon explicitly ties TwinHub to Mingyang’s MySE 8.0-180 WTGs.

source_of_record_url:
https://storage.mfn.se/93750b6f-7f4d-4576-b62f-0ddff3408167/hexicon-appoints-mingyang-smart-energy-as-the-preferred-wind-turbine-generator-wtg-supplier-for-their-stepping-stone-floating-wind-project-in-the-uk.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6584
canonical_id: a184f26b-4d52-408f-ba21-2af5b56d4598
wind_farm_name: Wave Hub
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Mingyang Smart Energy
resolved_value: Mingyang Smart Energy
research_value: Mingyang Smart Energy
resolved_fact_id: 33889.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Hexicon supplier selection release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://storage.mfn.se/93750b6f-7f4d-4576-b62f-0ddff3408167/hexicon-appoints-mingyang-smart-energy-as-the-preferred-wind-turbine-generator-wtg-supplier-for-their-stepping-stone-floating-wind-project-in-the-uk.pdf

research_summary:
Hexicon named Mingyang Smart Energy as preferred WTG supplier for TwinHub. No later authoritative source was found superseding that project-specific turbine supplier selection.


wind_farm_id: 6584
canonical_id: a184f26b-4d52-408f-ba21-2af5b56d4598
wind_farm_name: Wave Hub
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 8 MW
resolved_value: 8 MW
research_value: 8 MW
resolved_fact_id: 33890.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Hexicon supplier selection release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The selected turbine type is explicitly project-linked as MySE 8.0-180, and project descriptions of TwinHub as four turbines totalling 32 MW imply 8 MW each; the supplier-selection release is the main project-specific evidence.


wind_farm_id: 6584
canonical_id: a184f26b-4d52-408f-ba21-2af5b56d4598
wind_farm_name: Wave Hub
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 180 m
resolved_value: 180 m
research_value: 180 m
resolved_fact_id: 33891.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Hexicon supplier selection release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Rotor diameter is project-supported because the chosen project-specific turbine model is explicitly MySE 8.0-180; the “180” designation is corroborated independently for that model.


wind_farm_id: 6584
canonical_id: a184f26b-4d52-408f-ba21-2af5b56d4598
wind_farm_name: Wave Hub
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.enersynt.com/projects/twinhub
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Enersynt TwinHub page
source_of_record_url: https://www.enersynt.com/projects/twinhub
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific accessible source found that explicitly states a hub height for TwinHub/Wave Hub. Per instruction, this is left as Not confirmed rather than inferred from the generic turbine model.


wind_farm_id: 6584
canonical_id: a184f26b-4d52-408f-ba21-2af5b56d4598
wind_farm_name: Wave Hub
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 4
resolved_value: 4
research_value: 4
resolved_fact_id: 33892.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.enersynt.com/projects/twinhub
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Enersynt TwinHub page
source_of_record_url: https://www.enersynt.com/projects/twinhub
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific accessible sources support four turbines in total. Enersynt describes “two TwinWind floating platforms” with “two 8.0 MW wind turbine generators” on each platform, implying four turbines overall; this is consistent with the 32 MW total and 8 MW turbine rating.


wind_farm_id: 6584
canonical_id: a184f26b-4d52-408f-ba21-2af5b56d4598
wind_farm_name: Wave Hub
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 33893.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.bechtel.com/projects/twinhub/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Bechtel TwinHub page
source_of_record_url: https://www.bechtel.com/projects/twinhub/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Floating twin-turbine platform (Hexicon TwinWind) with single-point mooring / catenary mooring system

resolved_value:
Floating twin-turbine platform (Hexicon TwinWind) with single-point mooring / catenary mooring system

research_summary:
Project and technology sources describe Hexicon’s TwinWind floating foundation/platform and state that the project uses a single mooring point, with other project descriptions referring to catenary mooring for the TwinHub concept. This supports a floating foundation classification; no more granular substructure detail was confirmed from open project documentation reviewed here.


wind_farm_id: 6584
canonical_id: a184f26b-4d52-408f-ba21-2af5b56d4598
wind_farm_name: Wave Hub
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/09/2007
resolved_value: 01/09/2007
research_value: 01/09/2007
resolved_fact_id: 33894.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/project-sites/wave-hub
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Tethys Wave Hub project page
source_of_record_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/project-sites/wave-hub
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Accessible sources state Wave Hub was granted consent in 2007 / September 2007 for the site and infrastructure. The exact day was not confirmed, so the month-normalized date rule is applied. This is the original site consent, later varied to accommodate floating wind.


wind_farm_id: 6584
canonical_id: a184f26b-4d52-408f-ba21-2af5b56d4598
wind_farm_name: Wave Hub
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://attachment.news.eu.nasdaq.com/a9daf75833f809472d2da8eedb169b237
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Hexicon Annual Report 2025
source_of_record_url: https://attachment.news.eu.nasdaq.com/a9daf75833f809472d2da8eedb169b237
source_of_record_licence: public document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No authoritative accessible source found confirming that TwinHub/Wave Hub reached FID. Hexicon’s Annual Report 2025 instead notes contingent consideration payable only if the project reaches FID, which suggests FID had not been achieved by 31/12/2025.


wind_farm_id: 6584
canonical_id: a184f26b-4d52-408f-ba21-2af5b56d4598
wind_farm_name: Wave Hub
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Hexicon impairment release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://storage.mfn.se/d4cb2a1b-11b9-420c-9b2f-0f9acf0eb3fc/hexicon-announces-impairment-related-to-the-uk-based-twinhub-project-of-sek-115-million.pdf

research_summary:
No evidence of first power was found; the project remained pre-construction/consented and was impaired in early 2026.

source_of_record_url:
https://storage.mfn.se/d4cb2a1b-11b9-420c-9b2f-0f9acf0eb3fc/hexicon-announces-impairment-related-to-the-uk-based-twinhub-project-of-sek-115-million.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6584
canonical_id: a184f26b-4d52-408f-ba21-2af5b56d4598
wind_farm_name: Wave Hub
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: AR4 results accessible webpage
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence v3.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/contracts-for-difference-cfd-allocation-round-4-results/contracts-for-difference-cfd-allocation-round-4-results-accessible-webpage

research_summary:
No commissioning date was found in authoritative accessible sources, and no evidence indicates the project entered operation.


wind_farm_id: 6595
canonical_id: 21c365e0-703b-4900-a9a2-8c836b0b439b
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Vanguard West
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Norfolk Vanguard West; historic wider-project name: Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm
research_value: Norfolk Vanguard West; historic wider-project name: Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm
citation_url: https://norfolkzone.rwe.com/about-norfolk
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE Norfolk project page
source_of_record_url: https://norfolkzone.rwe.com/about-norfolk
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
RWE’s current project page separates Vanguard West from Vanguard East and Boreas. The original DCO and earlier planning documents were issued for the broader Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm, which was later split in delivery terms into West and East phases.


wind_farm_id: 6595
canonical_id: 21c365e0-703b-4900-a9a2-8c836b0b439b
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Vanguard West
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 33895.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE 14/01/2026 KKR partnership announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: RWE. Current owner(s): RWE 100% on available project pages; announced future partnership: RWE / KKR 50% / 50% subject to closing. Operator: RWE currently; future joint develop/construct/operate arrangement announced with KKR.

resolved_value:
Developer: RWE. Current owner(s): RWE 100% on available project pages; announced future partnership: RWE / KKR 50% / 50% subject to closing. Operator: RWE currently; future joint develop/construct/operate arrangement announced with KKR.

citation_url:
https://www.rwe.com/en/investor-relations/financial-calendar-and-publications/news-and-ad-hoc-announcements/news/news-2026-01-14/

research_summary:
RWE’s Norfolk project page (no visible publication date shown) says Vanguard West is “fully owned” by RWE. The freshest dated ownership source is RWE news dated 14/01/2026, which says KKR will acquire a 50% equity stake and both partners will jointly develop, construct and operate, but that closing is expected in summer 2026. So the best-supported current ownership remains RWE 100% pending close.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.rwe.com/en/investor-relations/financial-calendar-and-publications/news-and-ad-hoc-announcements/news/news-2026-01-14/


wind_farm_id: 6595
canonical_id: 21c365e0-703b-4900-a9a2-8c836b0b439b
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Vanguard West
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall sale completion announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developed by Vattenfall originally; acquired by RWE in 03/2024; KKR agreed in 01/2026 to buy 50% subject to approvals/closing.

research_value:
Developed by Vattenfall originally; acquired by RWE in 03/2024; KKR agreed in 01/2026 to buy 50% subject to approvals/closing.

citation_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/press-and-media/pressreleases/2024/vattenfall-and-rwe-conclude-sale-of-norfolk-offshore-wind-zone

research_summary:
Vattenfall’s 27/03/2024 release confirms sale completion of the Norfolk Offshore Wind Zone to RWE. RWE’s 14/01/2026 announcement is the freshest dated source and confirms a planned 50% / 50% partnership for Vanguard West, but not yet closed at publication.

source_of_record_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/press-and-media/pressreleases/2024/vattenfall-and-rwe-conclude-sale-of-norfolk-offshore-wind-zone


wind_farm_id: 6595
canonical_id: 21c365e0-703b-4900-a9a2-8c836b0b439b
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Vanguard West
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: FID Taken, Pre-Construction
resolved_value: FID Taken, Pre-Construction
research_value: FID Taken, Pre-Construction
resolved_fact_id: 33896.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE 20/02/2026 Vestas agreement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.rwe.com/en/press/rwe-offshore-wind-gmbh/2026-02-20-rwe-and-vestas-agree-turbine-supply-agreement-for-vanguard-west-offshore-wind-farm/

research_summary:
The project is fully consented, won AR7 CfD capacity in January 2026, and RWE signed turbine and transition-piece supply agreements; however RWE’s 20/02/2026 release says it is still targeting FID in summer 2026, so FID has not yet been taken. Among the allowed labels, the closest exact Boundary Layer status is FID Taken, Pre-Construction, but this is a nuance case: in plain-language project status it is better described as a late-stage consented pre-construction project.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.rwe.com/en/press/rwe-offshore-wind-gmbh/2026-02-20-rwe-and-vestas-agree-turbine-supply-agreement-for-vanguard-west-offshore-wind-farm/


wind_farm_id: 6595
canonical_id: 21c365e0-703b-4900-a9a2-8c836b0b439b
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Vanguard West
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1,545 MW
resolved_value: 1,545 MW
research_value: 1,545 MW
resolved_fact_id: 33897.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK AR7 results
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence v3.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/contracts-for-difference-cfd-allocation-round-7-results/contracts-for-difference-allocation-round-7-results-accessible-webpage

research_summary:
There is a material phase-specific difference between the older planning envelope and the current project. Older sources and the cluster page describe Vanguard West as 1.4 GW, but the dated AR7 government results and RWE’s 2026 turbine contract both support 92 × 15 MW = 1,380 MW plus 90 MW plus 75 MW CfD units = 1,545 MW for Norfolk Vanguard West.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/contracts-for-difference-cfd-allocation-round-7-results/contracts-for-difference-allocation-round-7-results-accessible-webpage


wind_farm_id: 6595
canonical_id: 21c365e0-703b-4900-a9a2-8c836b0b439b
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Vanguard West
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Norfolk Vanguard capacity non-material change statement
source_of_record_licence: public document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/657c4b4a95bf65000d719087/01_-_Supporting_Statement_-_Norfolk_Vanguard_Capacity_NMC.pdf

research_summary:
I found no openly accessible authoritative source that clearly states a phase-specific MEC/export capacity for Norfolk Vanguard West alone. The 2022 non-material change material concerns removing a cap for the wider Norfolk Vanguard project rather than giving a clean, current West-only MEC value; AR7 data show CfD-awarded generation capacity, not export capacity.

source_of_record_url:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/657c4b4a95bf65000d719087/01_-_Supporting_Statement_-_Norfolk_Vanguard_Capacity_NMC.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6595
canonical_id: 21c365e0-703b-4900-a9a2-8c836b0b439b
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Vanguard West
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: V236-15.0 MW
resolved_value: V236-15.0 MW
research_value: V236-15.0 MW
resolved_fact_id: 33898.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE 20/02/2026 Vestas agreement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.rwe.com/en/press/rwe-offshore-wind-gmbh/2026-02-20-rwe-and-vestas-agree-turbine-supply-agreement-for-vanguard-west-offshore-wind-farm/

research_summary:
RWE’s dated 20/02/2026 contract award explicitly ties the turbine model to Vanguard West: 92 Vestas V236-15.0 MW turbines. Vattenfall’s earlier 2023 reservation agreement confirms Vestas as preferred supplier for this specific project, supporting continuity.


wind_farm_id: 6595
canonical_id: 21c365e0-703b-4900-a9a2-8c836b0b439b
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Vanguard West
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas
resolved_value: Vestas
research_value: Vestas
resolved_fact_id: 33899.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE 20/02/2026 Vestas agreement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific sourcing is clear: Vattenfall named Vestas as preferred supplier in 2023, and RWE’s 2026 turbine supply agreement confirms Vestas for Vanguard West.


wind_farm_id: 6595
canonical_id: 21c365e0-703b-4900-a9a2-8c836b0b439b
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Vanguard West
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 15 MW
resolved_value: 15 MW
research_value: 15 MW
resolved_fact_id: 33900.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE 20/02/2026 Vestas agreement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
RWE’s 2026 release explicitly says V236-15.0 MW turbines for Vanguard West. This is also consistent with the AR7 awarded capacity structure and 92-turbine count.


wind_farm_id: 6595
canonical_id: 21c365e0-703b-4900-a9a2-8c836b0b439b
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Vanguard West
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Order 2022
source_of_record_licence: public legislation / public document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://norfolkzone.rwe.com/-/media/Project/Team/Norfolk/resources/development-consent-orders/norfolk-vanguard-offshore-wind-farm-order-2022.pdf?hash=A7A93BEA402C5C07BFA9F5F0543C6D65&rev=58e1e3839fb8482b96e8a9bdab868e3c

research_summary:
Although the turbine model is confirmed, I did not find a project-specific authoritative source explicitly stating the rotor diameter for Norfolk Vanguard West itself. The DCO only gives a consented maximum turbine envelope, and the instructions prohibit inferring site-specific rotor diameter from a generic turbine product page.

source_of_record_url:
https://norfolkzone.rwe.com/-/media/Project/Team/Norfolk/resources/development-consent-orders/norfolk-vanguard-offshore-wind-farm-order-2022.pdf?hash=A7A93BEA402C5C07BFA9F5F0543C6D65&rev=58e1e3839fb8482b96e8a9bdab868e3c


wind_farm_id: 6595
canonical_id: 21c365e0-703b-4900-a9a2-8c836b0b439b
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Vanguard West
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Order 2022
source_of_record_licence: public legislation / public document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://norfolkzone.rwe.com/-/media/Project/Team/Norfolk/resources/development-consent-orders/norfolk-vanguard-offshore-wind-farm-order-2022.pdf?hash=A7A93BEA402C5C07BFA9F5F0543C6D65&rev=58e1e3839fb8482b96e8a9bdab868e3c

research_summary:
I found only the DCO/project-envelope maximum and minimum hub-height parameters for the broader Norfolk Vanguard consent, not a project-specific as-selected hub height for Vanguard West. Per the instructions, this should remain Not confirmed rather than inferred from the turbine model.


wind_farm_id: 6595
canonical_id: 21c365e0-703b-4900-a9a2-8c836b0b439b
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Vanguard West
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 92
resolved_value: 92
research_value: 92
resolved_fact_id: 33901.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE 20/02/2026 Vestas agreement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
RWE’s 2026 turbine contract and its 2024 transition-piece contract both support 92 for Vanguard West. This differs from the provided database validation signals of 90; the likely reason is that 90 reflects an older project-envelope or dataset value, while current phase-specific execution plans now use 92 turbines at 15 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6595
canonical_id: 21c365e0-703b-4900-a9a2-8c836b0b439b
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Vanguard West
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopiles; transition pieces
resolved_value: Monopiles; transition pieces
research_value: Monopiles; transition pieces
resolved_fact_id: 33902.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.seahwind.com/latest/seah-wind-and-vattenfall-sign-contract
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SeAH Wind monopile contract announcement
source_of_record_url: https://www.seahwind.com/latest/seah-wind-and-vattenfall-sign-contract
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific supply-chain sources support monopile-based foundations for Vanguard West: SeAH Wind’s 2023 contract is for monopiles for Vanguard East and West, and RWE’s 2024 contract covers 92 transition pieces for Vanguard West. The original DCO allowed several foundation types in the consent envelope, but current procurement points to monopiles for execution.


wind_farm_id: 6595
canonical_id: 21c365e0-703b-4900-a9a2-8c836b0b439b
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Vanguard West
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 11/02/2022
resolved_value: 11/02/2022
research_value: 11/02/2022
resolved_fact_id: 33903.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/norfolk-vanguard-development-consent-decision-announced
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK DCO decision
source_of_record_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/norfolk-vanguard-development-consent-decision-announced
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence v3.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The Secretary of State re-determined and granted the Norfolk Vanguard DCO on 11/02/2022. RWE’s current project page repeats that date for the project cluster.


wind_farm_id: 6595
canonical_id: 21c365e0-703b-4900-a9a2-8c836b0b439b
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Vanguard West
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE 20/02/2026 Vestas agreement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No FID has yet been confirmed. RWE’s 20/02/2026 release says it is targeting FID in summer 2026, so the milestone has not been reached as of that source date.


wind_farm_id: 6595
canonical_id: 21c365e0-703b-4900-a9a2-8c836b0b439b
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Vanguard West
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE 20/02/2026 Vestas agreement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No first-power milestone has been announced. RWE says commissioning of the project expected in 2029 and turbine commissioning at Vanguard West is expected to take place in 2029, but that is not first-power confirmation.


wind_farm_id: 6595
canonical_id: 21c365e0-703b-4900-a9a2-8c836b0b439b
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Vanguard West
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE 20/02/2026 Vestas agreement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Full commissioning has not yet occurred. RWE’s dated source says commissioning is expected in 2029, which is forecast timing rather than a completed milestone.


wind_farm_id: 6597
canonical_id: fb7e4713-56e0-48b7-87de-0c899e97c53b
wind_farm_name: Borssele Kavel II
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 47
resolved_value: 47
resolved_fact_id: 47097.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: unavailable
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
resolved_source_detail:
Calculated from 47 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations (47 linked turbines also fall within another wind farm geometry)


wind_farm_id: 6599
canonical_id: 62075a95-f53d-44d0-889d-37f50c91819e
wind_farm_name: ZeeEnergie / Gemini II
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 75
resolved_value: 75
resolved_fact_id: 47098.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: unavailable
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
resolved_source_detail:
Calculated from 75 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations (75 linked turbines also fall within another wind farm geometry)


wind_farm_id: 6602
canonical_id: e2a3ac97-37ec-413a-8bd5-053fe0ea68fe
wind_farm_name: Borssele Kavel IV
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 40
resolved_value: 40
resolved_fact_id: 47099.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: unavailable
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
resolved_source_detail:
Calculated from 40 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations (40 linked turbines also fall within another wind farm geometry)


wind_farm_id: 6603
canonical_id: 935cb730-aa22-4162-8279-c348eb5c6550
wind_farm_name: WP Q10 / Eneco Luchterduinen
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 43
resolved_value: 43
resolved_fact_id: 47100.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: unavailable
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
resolved_source_detail:
Calculated from 43 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations (43 linked turbines also fall within another wind farm geometry)


wind_farm_id: 6607
canonical_id: 7a13b3fb-b1f8-4c41-96c7-f8f86267358f
wind_farm_name: Buchan Deep Demo
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.equinor.com/sustainability/impact-assessments-hywind-scotland-pilot-park
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Equinor impact assessment page
source_of_record_url: https://www.equinor.com/sustainability/impact-assessments-hywind-scotland-pilot-park
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Buchan Deep Demo (public/project name: Hywind Scotland; also referred to as Hywind Scotland Pilot Park / Buchan Deep)

research_value:
Buchan Deep Demo (public/project name: Hywind Scotland; also referred to as Hywind Scotland Pilot Park / Buchan Deep)

research_summary:
Phase/name ambiguity resolved: the Buchan Deep demo site corresponds to the operational Hywind Scotland floating pilot park at Buchan Deep off Peterhead. Equinor’s impact-assessment landing page explicitly states “Hywind Scotland Pilot Park” and describes Hywind as a floating offshore pilot wind farm at Buchan Deep. Equinor and Masdar use the public project name Hywind Scotland.


wind_farm_id: 6607
canonical_id: 7a13b3fb-b1f8-4c41-96c7-f8f86267358f
wind_farm_name: Buchan Deep Demo
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 33904.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://masdar.ae/en/renewables/our-projects/hywind-scotland
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Masdar Hywind Scotland
source_of_record_url: https://masdar.ae/en/renewables/our-projects/hywind-scotland
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Statoil ASA (now Equinor). Current owners: Equinor 75%, Masdar 25%. Operator: Equinor / Hywind (Scotland) Ltd.

resolved_value:
Developer: Statoil ASA (now Equinor). Current owners: Equinor 75%, Masdar 25%. Operator: Equinor / Hywind (Scotland) Ltd.

research_summary:
Equinor states the project is “Hywind Scotland”; Masdar’s project page states Masdar 25% and Equinor 75%. Freshness note: the newest dated ownership confirmation found is Equinor’s 2025 annual report listing Hywind Scotland 75%; Masdar’s live project page also confirms the 25/75 split.


wind_farm_id: 6607
canonical_id: 7a13b3fb-b1f8-4c41-96c7-f8f86267358f
wind_farm_name: Buchan Deep Demo
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Masdar July 2017 release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developed by Statoil/Equinor; Masdar acquired a 25% stake before construction completion; current split remains Equinor 75% / Masdar 25%.

research_value:
Developed by Statoil/Equinor; Masdar acquired a 25% stake before construction completion; current split remains Equinor 75% / Masdar 25%.

citation_url:
https://masdar.ae/en/news/newsroom/worlds-first-commercial-scale-floating-offshore-wind-farm-on-its-way-to-scotland-23

research_summary:
Ownership history is straightforward: Statoil developed the project, then Masdar acquired 25%. Masdar’s 2017 releases describe the stake acquisition; current ownership is still shown as 75/25 on current Equinor/Masdar materials. Freshness note: current split corroborated by Equinor 2025 annual report and Masdar live project page.

source_of_record_url:
https://masdar.ae/en/news/newsroom/worlds-first-commercial-scale-floating-offshore-wind-farm-on-its-way-to-scotland-23


wind_farm_id: 6607
canonical_id: 7a13b3fb-b1f8-4c41-96c7-f8f86267358f
wind_farm_name: Buchan Deep Demo
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 33905.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Scotland O&M programme PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/operational_and_maintenance_programme_-_april_2023_redacted.pdf

research_summary:
Equinor says the wind farm “has been in operation since 2017”; Marine Scotland’s 2023 O&M programme says Hywind Scotland “first became operational in October 2017.” This fits the Boundary Layer label Operational.

source_of_record_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/operational_and_maintenance_programme_-_april_2023_redacted.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6607
canonical_id: 7a13b3fb-b1f8-4c41-96c7-f8f86267358f
wind_farm_name: Buchan Deep Demo
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 30 MW
resolved_value: 30 MW
research_value: 30 MW
resolved_fact_id: 33906.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.equinor.com/energy/hywind-scotland
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Equinor Hywind Scotland
source_of_record_url: https://www.equinor.com/energy/hywind-scotland
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Equinor, Masdar and Marine Scotland all state 30 MW total installed capacity. This aligns with the validation context.


wind_farm_id: 6607
canonical_id: 7a13b3fb-b1f8-4c41-96c7-f8f86267358f
wind_farm_name: Buchan Deep Demo
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 30 MW
resolved_value: 30 MW
research_value: 30 MW
resolved_fact_id: 33907.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Scotland O&M programme PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/operational_and_maintenance_programme_-_april_2023_redacted.pdf

research_summary:
No clearly labelled public source was found using the exact term MEC for this demo project. The project’s installed/exported generating capacity is consistently described as 30 MW, so 30 MW is the best-supported practical MEC proxy; treat as inferred from project capacity/export arrangement rather than an explicitly labelled MEC line.


wind_farm_id: 6607
canonical_id: 7a13b3fb-b1f8-4c41-96c7-f8f86267358f
wind_farm_name: Buchan Deep Demo
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: SWT-6.0-154
resolved_value: SWT-6.0-154
research_value: SWT-6.0-154
resolved_fact_id: 33908.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web pages confirm five 6 MW turbines and Equinor confirms 154 m diameter, but they do not clearly name the exact model on the live page. Per the required fallback rule, the linked EuroWindWakes turbine row is used for the exact project-specific model value SWT-6.0-154.


wind_farm_id: 6607
canonical_id: 7a13b3fb-b1f8-4c41-96c7-f8f86267358f
wind_farm_name: Buchan Deep Demo
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens
resolved_value: Siemens
research_value: Siemens
resolved_fact_id: 9095.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific public pages confirm five 6 MW turbines but do not always name the OEM on the live page. Per the required fallback rule, the linked EuroWindWakes project-turbine metadata is used for Siemens. This is also consistent with secondary public references, but the chosen value is dataset-backed.


wind_farm_id: 6607
canonical_id: 7a13b3fb-b1f8-4c41-96c7-f8f86267358f
wind_farm_name: Buchan Deep Demo
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 6
resolved_value: 6
research_value: 6 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9405.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Masdar Hywind Scotland
research_source_type: owner page
research_source_url: https://masdar.ae/en/renewables/our-projects/hywind-scotland
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Masdar and Marine Scotland both state the project consists of five 6 MW turbines. This also matches the linked turbine dataset.


wind_farm_id: 6607
canonical_id: 7a13b3fb-b1f8-4c41-96c7-f8f86267358f
wind_farm_name: Buchan Deep Demo
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 154
resolved_value: 154
research_value: 154 m
resolved_fact_id: 9560.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Equinor Hywind Scotland
research_source_type: official project page
research_source_url: https://www.equinor.com/energy/hywind-scotland
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Equinor’s live project page explicitly states Diameter 154 m. The linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata also gives 154 m; value treated as strongly confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6607
canonical_id: 7a13b3fb-b1f8-4c41-96c7-f8f86267358f
wind_farm_name: Buchan Deep Demo
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 98
resolved_value: 98
research_value: 98 m
resolved_fact_id: 9715.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web research did not produce an accessible authoritative page explicitly stating hub height for this specific project. Per the required fallback rule, the linked EuroWindWakes project-turbine metadata value 98 m is used.


wind_farm_id: 6607
canonical_id: 7a13b3fb-b1f8-4c41-96c7-f8f86267358f
wind_farm_name: Buchan Deep Demo
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 5
resolved_value: 5
research_value: 5
resolved_fact_id: 47102.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 5 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Equinor Hywind Scotland
research_source_type: official project page
research_source_url: https://www.equinor.com/energy/hywind-scotland
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Equinor, Masdar and Marine Scotland all state 5 turbines / five 6 MW turbines. This aligns exactly with the non-web validation signals: database winner 5, EuroWindWakes linked-turbine count 5, and EMODnet hint 5.


wind_farm_id: 6607
canonical_id: 7a13b3fb-b1f8-4c41-96c7-f8f86267358f
wind_farm_name: Buchan Deep Demo
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 33914.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.equinor.com/energy/hywind-scotland
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Equinor Hywind Scotland
source_of_record_url: https://www.equinor.com/energy/hywind-scotland
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Floating spar-type substructures (spar-buoy), moored by three-point mooring spread with suction anchors

resolved_value:
Floating spar-type substructures (spar-buoy), moored by three-point mooring spread with suction anchors

research_summary:
Equinor explicitly states spar-type substructure. Marine Scotland’s O&M programme confirms each turbine is anchored by a three-point mooring spread; Equinor’s live page says they are anchored with three suction anchors each.


wind_farm_id: 6607
canonical_id: 7a13b3fb-b1f8-4c41-96c7-f8f86267358f
wind_farm_name: Buchan Deep Demo
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 30/10/2015
resolved_value: 30/10/2015
research_value: 30/10/2015
resolved_fact_id: 33915.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Scotland O&M programme PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Marine Scotland’s 2023 O&M programme states Equinor “received a Marine Licence on the 30th October 2015” to develop Hywind Scotland. A related Marine Scotland consent document is dated 23/10/2015; because the clearest project-level operational document states the licence date as 30/10/2015, that is the chosen consent date.


wind_farm_id: 6607
canonical_id: 7a13b3fb-b1f8-4c41-96c7-f8f86267358f
wind_farm_name: Buchan Deep Demo
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/11/2015
resolved_value: 01/11/2015
research_value: 01/11/2015
resolved_fact_id: 33916.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://blog.geogarage.com/2015/11/statoil-to-build-worlds-first-floating.html
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GeoGarage summary citing November 2015 FID
source_of_record_url: https://blog.geogarage.com/2015/11/statoil-to-build-worlds-first-floating.html
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Public authoritative pages do not surface a clean dated FID line on the current live project pages. However, project materials and contemporaneous coverage describe the project as unveiled / approved in late 2015. To normalize the month-level evidence, 01/11/2015 is used as the month-normalized FID date, with the caveat that the evidence is month-level rather than a day-specific official FID notice.


wind_farm_id: 6607
canonical_id: 7a13b3fb-b1f8-4c41-96c7-f8f86267358f
wind_farm_name: Buchan Deep Demo
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 18/10/2017
resolved_value: 18/10/2017
research_value: 18/10/2017
resolved_fact_id: 33917.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.equinor.com/news/archive/worlds-first-floating-wind-farm-started-production
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Equinor 18 Oct 2017 release
source_of_record_url: https://www.equinor.com/news/archive/worlds-first-floating-wind-farm-started-production
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Equinor’s dated news release says the world’s first floating wind farm started production on 18/10/2017. This is the strongest accessible first-power evidence. Marine Scotland’s later O&M programme confirms first operation in October 2017.


wind_farm_id: 6607
canonical_id: 7a13b3fb-b1f8-4c41-96c7-f8f86267358f
wind_farm_name: Buchan Deep Demo
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2017-10-01
resolved_value: 2017-10-01
research_value: 01/10/2017
resolved_fact_id: 9870.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Marine Scotland O&M programme PDF
research_source_type: regulator document
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Public sources generally describe Hywind Scotland as operational / commissioned in October 2017 rather than giving a separate later COD date. Equinor’s project page says it started producing electricity in October 2017, and Marine Scotland says it first became operational in October 2017. Using the normalization rule for month-only evidence, full commissioning is recorded as 01/10/2017.


wind_farm_id: 6608
canonical_id: 850c8052-cd9b-4394-8ece-40d51d5af4bb
wind_farm_name: Ossian Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.ossianwindfarm.com/partnership
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ossian project website
source_of_record_url: https://www.ossianwindfarm.com/partnership
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Ossian Offshore Wind Farm (array project); historic ScotWind plan option reference E1 East / East Floating Offshore Wind Farm

research_value:
Ossian Offshore Wind Farm (array project); historic ScotWind plan option reference E1 East / East Floating Offshore Wind Farm

research_summary:
Official project pages use Ossian. Crown Estate Scotland’s SCDS outlook shows the project as the E1 East Floating Offshore Wind Farm post-award, while RPS notes the project “has since been named Ossian,” resolving the name ambiguity.


wind_farm_id: 6608
canonical_id: 850c8052-cd9b-4394-8ece-40d51d5af4bb
wind_farm_name: Ossian Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 33959.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.ossianwindfarm.com/partnership
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ossian project website
source_of_record_url: https://www.ossianwindfarm.com/partnership
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Joint venture between SSE Renewables, Marubeni Corporation, and Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners (CIP); operator not separately confirmed

resolved_value:
Joint venture between SSE Renewables, Marubeni Corporation, and Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners (CIP); operator not separately confirmed

research_summary:
Freshest owner/developer confirmation located was the Ossian project website copyright 2025 / live 2025 page, which states the JV partners as SSE Renewables, Marubeni and CIP. SSE’s live floating-wind portfolio page also confirms those three partners. No project-specific source found that separates an operator from the JV developer.


wind_farm_id: 6608
canonical_id: 850c8052-cd9b-4394-8ece-40d51d5af4bb
wind_farm_name: Ossian Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/non-technical_summary_2.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate Non-Technical Summary
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/non-technical_summary_2.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public sector information / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Same three-party JV confirmed from award stage through current project pages; ownership percentages Not confirmed

research_value:
Same three-party JV confirmed from award stage through current project pages; ownership percentages Not confirmed

research_summary:
Ownership history appears stable: the March 2023 scoping materials and June 2024 planning statement both describe the applicant as a JV of SSE Renewables, CIP and Marubeni, and the live 2025 project pages still show the same partnership. Freshest source date relied on: live Ossian project page, 2025 copyright / current page. No open authoritative source found that reconciles percentage shares to 100%, so percentages remain Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6608
canonical_id: 850c8052-cd9b-4394-8ece-40d51d5af4bb
wind_farm_name: Ossian Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
research_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_fact_id: 33960.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=node%2F23264
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate project page
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=node%2F23264
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The offshore array has a Section 36 consent application and marine licence applications submitted on 10/07/2024 and remains in application, with additional information submitted in 2025 and early 2026. That best fits the Boundary Layer label In Planning / Consent Application Submitted rather than Consented.


wind_farm_id: 6608
canonical_id: 850c8052-cd9b-4394-8ece-40d51d5af4bb
wind_farm_name: Ossian Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 3528 MW
resolved_value: 3528 MW
research_value: 3528 MW
resolved_fact_id: 33961.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Crown Estate Scotland SCDS Outlook
source_of_record_licence: public PDF / website terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.crownestatescotland.com/sites/default/files/2023-07/ossian-offshore-wind-farm-scds-outlook-july-2023-update.pdf

research_summary:
Crown Estate Scotland’s post-award SCDS outlook states NGESO confirmed up to 3,528 MW for Ossian. SSE and Ossian project pages still describe the project more broadly as up to 3.6 GW; for database-style profiling, 3,528 MW is the more specific current figure tied to network planning.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.crownestatescotland.com/sites/default/files/2023-07/ossian-offshore-wind-farm-scds-outlook-july-2023-update.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6608
canonical_id: 850c8052-cd9b-4394-8ece-40d51d5af4bb
wind_farm_name: Ossian Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/planning_and_need_statement.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Planning & Need Statement
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/planning_and_need_statement.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public PDF / website terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Public sources reviewed clearly confirm project capacity, but none of the open accessible project/regulatory pages reviewed gave a clean project-level MEC/export capacity value distinct from installed/planned capacity. The transmission design is also evolving, which increases risk of confusing gross capacity with grid connection arrangements.


wind_farm_id: 6608
canonical_id: 850c8052-cd9b-4394-8ece-40d51d5af4bb
wind_farm_name: Ossian Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/planning_and_need_statement.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Planning & Need Statement
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/planning_and_need_statement.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public PDF / website terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific web source explicitly names a selected turbine model for Ossian. The June 2024 application uses a parameter envelope rather than a chosen OEM/model, so model should not be inferred.


wind_farm_id: 6608
canonical_id: 850c8052-cd9b-4394-8ece-40d51d5af4bb
wind_farm_name: Ossian Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/planning_and_need_statement.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Planning & Need Statement
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/planning_and_need_statement.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public PDF / website terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific web source explicitly confirms an OEM. The application documents remain technology-envelope based.


wind_farm_id: 6608
canonical_id: 850c8052-cd9b-4394-8ece-40d51d5af4bb
wind_farm_name: Ossian Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/planning_and_need_statement.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Planning & Need Statement
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/planning_and_need_statement.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public PDF / website terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No chosen turbine platform or per-turbine rating was confirmed in project-specific sources. The project is still at consent-application stage and retains a flexible design envelope.


wind_farm_id: 6608
canonical_id: 850c8052-cd9b-4394-8ece-40d51d5af4bb
wind_farm_name: Ossian Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/planning_and_need_statement.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Planning & Need Statement
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/planning_and_need_statement.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public PDF / website terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The application confirms only a maximum design envelope rotor diameter range, not a selected project turbine rotor diameter. Per the sourcing rules, site-specific rotor diameter is therefore Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6608
canonical_id: 850c8052-cd9b-4394-8ece-40d51d5af4bb
wind_farm_name: Ossian Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/planning_and_need_statement.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Planning & Need Statement
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/planning_and_need_statement.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public PDF / website terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The application confirms only a maximum hub height above LAT of 224 m within the design envelope, not a selected site-specific hub height for an adopted turbine. Hub height therefore remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6608
canonical_id: 850c8052-cd9b-4394-8ece-40d51d5af4bb
wind_farm_name: Ossian Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 265
resolved_value: 265
research_value: 265
resolved_fact_id: 33962.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/non-technical_summary_2.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate Non-Technical Summary
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/non-technical_summary_2.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public sector information / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The June 2024 application/NTS both state a maximum of 265 floating wind turbines. This differs from the non-web validation signal of 0 and likely reflects that the dataset hint has not yet been populated for a project still in planning; the web-sourced figure is the active consent envelope for the array.


wind_farm_id: 6608
canonical_id: 850c8052-cd9b-4394-8ece-40d51d5af4bb
wind_farm_name: Ossian Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 33963.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/planning_and_need_statement.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Planning & Need Statement
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/planning_and_need_statement.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public PDF / website terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Floating foundations; project design envelope considers semi-submersible and tension leg platform (TLP) solutions

resolved_value:
Floating foundations; project design envelope considers semi-submersible and tension leg platform (TLP) solutions

research_summary:
Project-specific planning documents confirm the wind turbines are floating and that the design envelope considers semi-submersible and TLP solutions, with mooring and anchoring systems. No final selected foundation subtype is confirmed yet.


wind_farm_id: 6608
canonical_id: 850c8052-cd9b-4394-8ece-40d51d5af4bb
wind_farm_name: Ossian Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=node%2F23264
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate project page
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=node%2F23264
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Consent has not been granted. The project is still at application stage, so there is no consent date to report.


wind_farm_id: 6608
canonical_id: 850c8052-cd9b-4394-8ece-40d51d5af4bb
wind_farm_name: Ossian Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.sserenewables.com/offshore-wind/floating-wind/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SSE Renewables floating wind page
source_of_record_url: https://www.sserenewables.com/offshore-wind/floating-wind/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific authoritative source found that states FID has been taken. The project remains in planning / consent application stage.


wind_farm_id: 6609
canonical_id: e108b075-ddcb-4f2b-9346-fde29f80febb
wind_farm_name: Bellrock
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/SC719449
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: UK Companies House
source_of_record_url: https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/SC719449
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Bellrock Offshore Wind Farm; historic name: Gemini Offshore Wind Farm Ltd / Bellrock Wind Farm Limited

research_value:
Bellrock Offshore Wind Farm; historic name: Gemini Offshore Wind Farm Ltd / Bellrock Wind Farm Limited

research_summary:
The project website and Companies House confirm the current project identity as Bellrock Offshore Wind Farm. Companies House shows historic company names GEMINI OFFSHORE WIND FARM LTD and BELLROCK WIND FARM LIMITED, resolving the Bellrock/Gemini naming ambiguity.


wind_farm_id: 6609
canonical_id: e108b075-ddcb-4f2b-9346-fde29f80febb
wind_farm_name: Bellrock
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 33991.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Bellrock Wind project news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Nadara via Bellrock Offshore Wind Farm Limited. Current owner of project SPV: Nadara (100%). Operator: Not confirmed separately.

resolved_value:
Developer: Nadara via Bellrock Offshore Wind Farm Limited. Current owner of project SPV: Nadara (100%). Operator: Not confirmed separately.

citation_url:
https://bellrockwind.co.uk/consent-applications-submitted-for-1-8-gw-bellrock-floating-offshore-wind-project/

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on: Bellrock/Nadara project news published 21/04/2026 states Bellrock Offshore Wind Farm Limited, wholly owned by Nadara. Older project material and the 2023 Crown Estate Scotland SCDS update show the project was originally developed by the BlueFloat Energy / Renantis partnership on a 50:50 basis before Nadara became sole owner. No separate operator was clearly disclosed in current sources.

source_of_record_url:
https://bellrockwind.co.uk/consent-applications-submitted-for-1-8-gw-bellrock-floating-offshore-wind-project/


wind_farm_id: 6609
canonical_id: e108b075-ddcb-4f2b-9346-fde29f80febb
wind_farm_name: Bellrock
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Crown Estate Scotland SCDS update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
11/01/2022 to 2023: BlueFloat Energy / Renantis partnership via project SPV; by 21/04/2026: Nadara sole owner of Bellrock Offshore Wind Farm Limited

research_value:
11/01/2022 to 2023: BlueFloat Energy / Renantis partnership via project SPV; by 21/04/2026: Nadara sole owner of Bellrock Offshore Wind Farm Limited

citation_url:
https://www.crownestatescotland.com/sites/default/files/2023-07/bellrock-offshore-wind-farm-scds-outlook-july-2023-update.pdf

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on: 21/04/2026 Bellrock news confirms Nadara sole ownership. Companies House confirms the same legal entity was first incorporated on 11/01/2022 as Gemini Offshore Wind Farm Ltd and later renamed. Crown Estate Scotland’s July 2023 SCDS update states the SPV was then owned equally by BlueFloat Energy and Renantis.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.crownestatescotland.com/sites/default/files/2023-07/bellrock-offshore-wind-farm-scds-outlook-july-2023-update.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6609
canonical_id: e108b075-ddcb-4f2b-9346-fde29f80febb
wind_farm_name: Bellrock
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
research_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_fact_id: 33992.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Bellrock Wind project news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://bellrockwind.co.uk/consent-applications-submitted-for-1-8-gw-bellrock-floating-offshore-wind-project/

research_summary:
The project had been at pre-application/scoping stage in 2024, but Bellrock’s published update dated 21/04/2026 says Section 36 and Marine Licence applications were submitted to Scottish Ministers for the Wind Farm Development Area. That moves it from lease-awarded/pre-planning into the exact Boundary Layer label In Planning / Consent Application Submitted.


wind_farm_id: 6609
canonical_id: e108b075-ddcb-4f2b-9346-fde29f80febb
wind_farm_name: Bellrock
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 1,800 MW
resolved_value: Up to 1,800 MW
research_value: Up to 1,800 MW
resolved_fact_id: 33993.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://bellrockwind.co.uk/the-project/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Bellrock Wind project page
source_of_record_url: https://bellrockwind.co.uk/the-project/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current project sources consistently describe Bellrock as up to 1.8 GW. This is newer than the older 1,200 MW ScotWind-era figure seen in BlueFloat and Crown Estate Scotland 2023 material, so the current planned capacity appears to have been increased during project maturation.


wind_farm_id: 6609
canonical_id: e108b075-ddcb-4f2b-9346-fde29f80febb
wind_farm_name: Bellrock
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://bellrockwind.co.uk/the-project/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Bellrock Wind project page
source_of_record_url: https://bellrockwind.co.uk/the-project/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Publicly accessible current pages confirm gross planned capacity, but I did not find an authoritative open source that explicitly states a separate MEC value for Bellrock. To avoid confusing gross capacity with export capacity, MEC is left as Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6609
canonical_id: e108b075-ddcb-4f2b-9346-fde29f80febb
wind_farm_name: Bellrock
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Bellrock scoping report
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/240326_-_bellrock_offshore_windfarm_-_scoping_-_scoping_report.pdf

research_summary:
The scoping report explicitly says the final WTG model will be selected post-consent. Current project pages give only an envelope and maximum turbine count, not a committed turbine model. No linked EuroWindWakes turbine row was provided in the prompt, so the field remains Not confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/240326_-_bellrock_offshore_windfarm_-_scoping_-_scoping_report.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6609
canonical_id: e108b075-ddcb-4f2b-9346-fde29f80febb
wind_farm_name: Bellrock
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Bellrock scoping report
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/240326_-_bellrock_offshore_windfarm_-_scoping_-_scoping_report.pdf

research_summary:
No project-specific current source names an OEM, and the scoping-stage documentation indicates final turbine selection is post-consent. Not inferred from generic turbine platforms.


wind_farm_id: 6609
canonical_id: e108b075-ddcb-4f2b-9346-fde29f80febb
wind_farm_name: Bellrock
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://bellrockwind.co.uk/the-project/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Bellrock Wind project page
source_of_record_url: https://bellrockwind.co.uk/the-project/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Bellrock public materials describe only the project-level capacity and a maximum of up to 120 WTGs on the project page / up to 132 WTGs in the April 2026 application news for the WFDA. No project-specific committed turbine rating was confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6609
canonical_id: e108b075-ddcb-4f2b-9346-fde29f80febb
wind_farm_name: Bellrock
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Bellrock scoping report
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project is still at consent-application stage and no authoritative open source explicitly ties a rotor diameter to Bellrock. Not inferred from generic turbine brochures.


wind_farm_id: 6609
canonical_id: e108b075-ddcb-4f2b-9346-fde29f80febb
wind_farm_name: Bellrock
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Bellrock scoping report
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No Bellrock-specific hub height was confirmed in accessible current web sources, and hub height must not be inferred from turbine platform alone.


wind_farm_id: 6609
canonical_id: e108b075-ddcb-4f2b-9346-fde29f80febb
wind_farm_name: Bellrock
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 132
resolved_value: Up to 132
research_value: Up to 132
resolved_fact_id: 33994.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Bellrock Wind project news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current project application news published 21/04/2026 says the consent applications cover Up to 132 floating wind turbine generators. This is newer and more specific than the project page wording up to 120 WTGs, and it differs materially from the database validation hint of 0 turbines, which likely reflects an older pre-planning dataset placeholder rather than an application-stage design envelope.


wind_farm_id: 6609
canonical_id: e108b075-ddcb-4f2b-9346-fde29f80febb
wind_farm_name: Bellrock
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Floating substructures with mooring lines and anchors
resolved_value: Floating substructures with mooring lines and anchors
research_value: Floating substructures with mooring lines and anchors
resolved_fact_id: 33995.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Bellrock Wind project news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The Bellrock project is explicitly described as floating. Current application news states the consent covers Floating substructures with mooring lines, anchors and associated scour protection; the project page similarly refers to floating substructures and station-keeping systems. Specific floater subtype was not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6609
canonical_id: e108b075-ddcb-4f2b-9346-fde29f80febb
wind_farm_name: Bellrock
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://bellrockwind.co.uk/the-project/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Bellrock Wind project page
source_of_record_url: https://bellrockwind.co.uk/the-project/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
As of the latest identified sources, applications have been submitted but no Section 36 consent grant date was confirmed. The project page indicates consent is expected in 2027 to 2028, which is indicative only, not an award date.


wind_farm_id: 6609
canonical_id: e108b075-ddcb-4f2b-9346-fde29f80febb
wind_farm_name: Bellrock
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Bellrock Wind project news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No authoritative current source located in this research states that FID has been taken. The project remains in consent application stage.


wind_farm_id: 6609
canonical_id: e108b075-ddcb-4f2b-9346-fde29f80febb
wind_farm_name: Bellrock
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://bellrockwind.co.uk/the-project/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Bellrock Wind project page
source_of_record_url: https://bellrockwind.co.uk/the-project/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No commissioning date has been confirmed; current sources indicate construction is expected to commence in the early 2030s, not that commissioning has been scheduled definitively.


wind_farm_id: 6610
canonical_id: 4ec007d7-632f-4c70-a3dc-79ce3762b48f
wind_farm_name: Bowdun Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Bowdun Offshore Wind Farm; alternative / historic name: Cluaran Deas Ear
research_value: Bowdun Offshore Wind Farm; alternative / historic name: Cluaran Deas Ear
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Thistle Wind Partners naming announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.thistlewindpartners.scot/news/twp-settles-on-final-names-for-its-scotwind-offshore-wind-farms/

research_summary:
TWP announced the final project name on 20/03/2023 and stated Bowdun is the 1 GW fixed-foundation project in the E3 leasing zone off Stonehaven. Corporate records and later official documents show the SPV was previously named Thistle Wind Partners Cluaran Deas Ear Ltd before being renamed Bowdun Offshore Wind Farm Ltd.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.thistlewindpartners.scot/news/twp-settles-on-final-names-for-its-scotwind-offshore-wind-farms/


wind_farm_id: 6610
canonical_id: 4ec007d7-632f-4c70-a3dc-79ce3762b48f
wind_farm_name: Bowdun Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 33964.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.deme-group.com/news/deme-aspiravi-and-qair-realign-ownership-scotwind-project
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEME ownership realignment press release
source_of_record_url: https://www.deme-group.com/news/deme-aspiravi-and-qair-realign-ownership-scotwind-project
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Thistle Wind Partners; current owners: DEME Concessions 70%, Aspiravi International 30%; operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: Thistle Wind Partners; current owners: DEME Concessions 70%, Aspiravi International 30%; operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
Freshest ownership evidence relied on is DEME’s 03/11/2025 press release, which says DEME Concessions and Aspiravi International are joint owners of Bowdun with 70% / 30% after a ScotWind ownership realignment. Earlier 2024 official project sources describe TWP as the JV developer of DEME, Qair and Aspiravi. No separate named project operator was clearly confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6610
canonical_id: 4ec007d7-632f-4c70-a3dc-79ce3762b48f
wind_farm_name: Bowdun Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.deme-group.com/news/deme-aspiravi-and-qair-realign-ownership-scotwind-project
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEME ownership realignment press release
source_of_record_url: https://www.deme-group.com/news/deme-aspiravi-and-qair-realign-ownership-scotwind-project
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Initially developed by TWP consortium (DEME, Qair, Aspiravi); from 03/11/2025 Bowdun ownership realigned to DEME Concessions 70% and Aspiravi International 30%, with Qair exiting Bowdun

research_value:
Initially developed by TWP consortium (DEME, Qair, Aspiravi); from 03/11/2025 Bowdun ownership realigned to DEME Concessions 70% and Aspiravi International 30%, with Qair exiting Bowdun

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on is 03/11/2025. TWP’s March 2023 naming release and 2024 project/scoping documents show Bowdun under the three-party TWP consortium. DEME’s November 2025 release states Qair exited Bowdun and DEME/Aspiravi became sole equity owners at 70/30.


wind_farm_id: 6610
canonical_id: 4ec007d7-632f-4c70-a3dc-79ce3762b48f
wind_farm_name: Bowdun Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
research_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_fact_id: 33965.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: TWP onshore application press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.thistlewindpartners.scot/thistle-news-events/news//twp-submits-onshore-plans-bowdun-offshore-windfarm/

research_summary:
Bowdun moved beyond lease-awarded / pre-planning once TWP submitted onshore planning permission in principle to Aberdeenshire Council on 10/12/2025. TWP also states the offshore consent submission will follow in 2026, so the closest Boundary Layer label is In Planning / Consent Application Submitted rather than lease-awarded.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.thistlewindpartners.scot/thistle-news-events/news//twp-submits-onshore-plans-bowdun-offshore-windfarm/


wind_farm_id: 6610
canonical_id: 4ec007d7-632f-4c70-a3dc-79ce3762b48f
wind_farm_name: Bowdun Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1008 MW
resolved_value: 1008 MW
research_value: 1008 MW
resolved_fact_id: 33966.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://thistlewindpartners.scot/assets/uploads/Bowdun-Onshore-Scoping-Report_04.09.2024.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Bowdun Onshore Scoping Report
source_of_record_url: https://thistlewindpartners.scot/assets/uploads/Bowdun-Onshore-Scoping-Report_04.09.2024.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Multiple project-specific official sources state Bowdun’s anticipated / practical maximum installed capacity is about 1008 MW. This matches the validation context.


wind_farm_id: 6610
canonical_id: 4ec007d7-632f-4c70-a3dc-79ce3762b48f
wind_farm_name: Bowdun Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://thistlewindpartners.scot/assets/uploads/Bowdun-Onshore-Scoping-Report_04.09.2024.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Bowdun Onshore Scoping Report
source_of_record_url: https://thistlewindpartners.scot/assets/uploads/Bowdun-Onshore-Scoping-Report_04.09.2024.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I found evidence for planned installed capacity and the 400 kV grid connection corridor, but no accessible official source clearly stated a project MEC / export capacity figure distinct from gross capacity. To avoid conflating installed capacity with MEC, this remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6610
canonical_id: 4ec007d7-632f-4c70-a3dc-79ce3762b48f
wind_farm_name: Bowdun Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.thistlewindpartners.scot/bowdun/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Bowdun project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.thistlewindpartners.scot/bowdun/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific web source located during this review named a final selected turbine model for Bowdun. The project is still pre-consent / pre-FID, and no linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided in the prompt, so the field remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6610
canonical_id: 4ec007d7-632f-4c70-a3dc-79ce3762b48f
wind_farm_name: Bowdun Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.thistlewindpartners.scot/bowdun/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Bowdun project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.thistlewindpartners.scot/bowdun/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific web source located during this review confirmed an OEM for Bowdun, and no linked EuroWindWakes fallback was available.


wind_farm_id: 6610
canonical_id: 4ec007d7-632f-4c70-a3dc-79ce3762b48f
wind_farm_name: Bowdun Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 18–25 MW
resolved_value: 18–25 MW
research_value: 18–25 MW
resolved_fact_id: 33967.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Thistle Wind Partners naming announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.thistlewindpartners.scot/news/twp-settles-on-final-names-for-its-scotwind-offshore-wind-farms/

research_summary:
TWP’s official naming announcement on 20/03/2023 stated Bowdun would number between 50 and 60 jacket-foundation turbines with individual capacity of 18-25 MW each. This appears to be an early project design range rather than a final as-built selection, but it is project-specific and explicit.


wind_farm_id: 6610
canonical_id: 4ec007d7-632f-4c70-a3dc-79ce3762b48f
wind_farm_name: Bowdun Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.thistlewindpartners.scot/bowdun/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Bowdun project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.thistlewindpartners.scot/bowdun/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific source found a Bowdun-specific rotor diameter, and no linked EuroWindWakes fallback was available.


wind_farm_id: 6610
canonical_id: 4ec007d7-632f-4c70-a3dc-79ce3762b48f
wind_farm_name: Bowdun Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.thistlewindpartners.scot/bowdun/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Bowdun project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.thistlewindpartners.scot/bowdun/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific source found a Bowdun-specific hub height, and the prompt states no linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata exists for this project.


wind_farm_id: 6610
canonical_id: 4ec007d7-632f-4c70-a3dc-79ce3762b48f
wind_farm_name: Bowdun Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 50–60 planned; 0 installed today
resolved_value: 50–60 planned; 0 installed today
research_value: 50–60 planned; 0 installed today
resolved_fact_id: 33968.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Thistle Wind Partners naming announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
TWP’s 20/03/2023 official naming release gave a project-specific planned range of 50 to 60 turbines. The project is not yet built, so installed turbines are effectively 0 at present. This partially aligns with the database validation signal of 0, which appears to reflect installed/current turbines rather than planned build-out; the difference is due to project phase.


wind_farm_id: 6610
canonical_id: 4ec007d7-632f-4c70-a3dc-79ce3762b48f
wind_farm_name: Bowdun Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 33969.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: TWP offshore scoping submission press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Fixed foundations; project design envelope considers monopile, piled/drilled jacket, and suction bucket jacket; early public TWP description said jacket-foundation turbines

resolved_value:
Fixed foundations; project design envelope considers monopile, piled/drilled jacket, and suction bucket jacket; early public TWP description said jacket-foundation turbines

citation_url:
https://www.thistlewindpartners.scot/news/thistle-wind-partners-submits-offshore-scoping-report-for-bowdun-offshore-wind-farm/

research_summary:
The most robust current project-specific wording is that Bowdun is a fixed-foundation project. The offshore scoping material says the design envelope considers monopile, piled/drilled jacket, and suction bucket jacket. An earlier TWP release in March 2023 described the project as 50–60 jacket-foundation turbines, but that appears to be an earlier concept statement rather than a locked final selection.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.thistlewindpartners.scot/news/thistle-wind-partners-submits-offshore-scoping-report-for-bowdun-offshore-wind-farm/


wind_farm_id: 6610
canonical_id: 4ec007d7-632f-4c70-a3dc-79ce3762b48f
wind_farm_name: Bowdun Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: TWP onshore application press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.thistlewindpartners.scot/thistle-news-events/news//twp-submits-onshore-plans-bowdun-offshore-windfarm/

research_summary:
No Section 36 / marine licence consent decision has been found for Bowdun. TWP stated on 10/12/2025 that the offshore consent submission would follow in 2026, indicating consent had not yet been granted.


wind_farm_id: 6610
canonical_id: 4ec007d7-632f-4c70-a3dc-79ce3762b48f
wind_farm_name: Bowdun Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Thistle Wind Partners naming announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
TWP’s March 2023 release said commissioning by 2033, but later dated sources reviewed here do not restate a firm commissioning date and the project is still pre-consent. To avoid overstating an early indicative schedule as a confirmed milestone, this remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6611
canonical_id: 4c4e4bf3-38e3-4eff-a297-63a4502a3c60
wind_farm_name: Ayre Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Ayre Offshore Wind Farm
research_value: Ayre Offshore Wind Farm
citation_url: https://www.qair.energy/realisations/ayre/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Qair project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.qair.energy/realisations/ayre/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official project name is consistently presented as Ayre Offshore Wind Farm by Qair, Thistle Wind Partners and Scottish planning materials. No robust alternative historic project name was found beyond shorthand such as “Ayre” or “Ayre OWF”.


wind_farm_id: 6611
canonical_id: 4c4e4bf3-38e3-4eff-a297-63a4502a3c60
wind_farm_name: Ayre Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 33970.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.qair.energy/realisations/ayre/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Qair project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.qair.energy/realisations/ayre/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: originally Thistle Wind Partners; current owner/developer: Qair (100%); Operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: originally Thistle Wind Partners; current owner/developer: Qair (100%); Operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
Freshest ownership evidence used is Qair’s project page crawled in 2026 stating it has acquired full ownership. Thistle Wind Partners’ site still describes Ayre as one of the two projects it was founded to deliver, so TWP is best treated as the original development consortium and Qair as the current sole owner/developer. No separate operator was confirmed from accessible sources.


wind_farm_id: 6611
canonical_id: 4c4e4bf3-38e3-4eff-a297-63a4502a3c60
wind_farm_name: Ayre Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Initially developed within Thistle Wind Partners; now wholly owned by Qair
research_value: Initially developed within Thistle Wind Partners; now wholly owned by Qair
citation_url: https://www.qair.energy/realisations/ayre/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Qair project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.qair.energy/realisations/ayre/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on is the Scottish Government publication dated 28/01/2026, which lists Ayre, Qair, 1008MW in planning. Qair’s own project page says it has “acquired full ownership”, indicating a transition from TWP consortium development to sole ownership by Qair. Accessible sources reviewed did not provide a dated full percentage breakdown for the earlier TWP partnership specific to Ayre, so earlier equity splits are not confirmed here.


wind_farm_id: 6611
canonical_id: 4c4e4bf3-38e3-4eff-a297-63a4502a3c60
wind_farm_name: Ayre Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
research_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_fact_id: 33971.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Highland Council committee report
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.highland.gov.uk/download/meetings/id/86534/6.%2520Pre%2520Determination%2520Hearing%2520and%2520Determination%2520of%2520Planning%2520Application

research_summary:
This best matches the Boundary Layer label because offshore consent has been submitted to the Marine Directorate, while Highland Council material says the offshore application is pending consideration by Scottish Ministers. Onshore planning consent was granted in March 2026, but the offshore generation asset is not yet consented.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.highland.gov.uk/download/meetings/id/86534/6.%2520Pre%2520Determination%2520Hearing%2520and%2520Determination%2520of%2520Planning%2520Application


wind_farm_id: 6611
canonical_id: 4c4e4bf3-38e3-4eff-a297-63a4502a3c60
wind_farm_name: Ayre Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1008 MW
resolved_value: 1008 MW
research_value: 1008 MW
resolved_fact_id: 33972.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Scottish Government offshore wind ambition update
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence v3.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Capacity is supported by the Scottish Government’s January 2026 offshore wind ambition update and by current project/developer reporting that describes Ayre as a 1 GW / 1,008 MW project. This aligns with the validation context.


wind_farm_id: 6611
canonical_id: 4c4e4bf3-38e3-4eff-a297-63a4502a3c60
wind_farm_name: Ayre Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Qair onshore consent announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.qair.energy/qair-gains-onshore-consent-for-1-gw-ayre-offshore-wind-farm-pioneering-floating-wind-innovation-from-france-to-the-uk/

research_summary:
Accessible sources reviewed clearly confirm installed/planned capacity, but did not clearly state a separate grid export limit / MEC for the offshore project. To avoid conflating installed capacity with export capacity, MEC is left Not confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.qair.energy/qair-gains-onshore-consent-for-1-gw-ayre-offshore-wind-farm-pioneering-floating-wind-innovation-from-france-to-the-uk/


wind_farm_id: 6611
canonical_id: 4c4e4bf3-38e3-4eff-a297-63a4502a3c60
wind_farm_name: Ayre Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/twp-ayr-rps-ofc-rpt-00014.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ayre HRA screening report
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/twp-ayr-rps-ofc-rpt-00014.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific accessible sources confirm only an envelope of up to 67 turbines and large turbine dimensions in planning documents/news coverage; no specific OEM model was explicitly tied to Ayre. Per instruction, no turbine model is inferred from generic OEM product pages or other wind farms.


wind_farm_id: 6611
canonical_id: 4c4e4bf3-38e3-4eff-a297-63a4502a3c60
wind_farm_name: Ayre Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/twp-ayr-rps-ofc-rpt-00014.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ayre HRA screening report
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/twp-ayr-rps-ofc-rpt-00014.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible project-specific source explicitly names the turbine OEM for Ayre. Left Not confirmed rather than inferred.


wind_farm_id: 6611
canonical_id: 4c4e4bf3-38e3-4eff-a297-63a4502a3c60
wind_farm_name: Ayre Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/twp-ayr-rps-ofc-rpt-00014.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ayre HRA screening report
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/twp-ayr-rps-ofc-rpt-00014.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project envelope implies roughly 15 MW class or higher if 1,008 MW is achieved with up to 67 turbines, but no source explicitly confirms a chosen turbine rating for Ayre. Left Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6611
canonical_id: 4c4e4bf3-38e3-4eff-a297-63a4502a3c60
wind_farm_name: Ayre Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/twp-ayr-rps-ofc-rpt-00014.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ayre HRA screening report
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/twp-ayr-rps-ofc-rpt-00014.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
A secondary 2026 article mentions a maximum rotor diameter of 326 m, but I did not find an accessible official project or regulator source directly confirming that value in a machine-checkable primary document. To stay conservative, rotor diameter is left Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6611
canonical_id: 4c4e4bf3-38e3-4eff-a297-63a4502a3c60
wind_farm_name: Ayre Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/twp-ayr-rps-ofc-rpt-00014.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ayre HRA screening report
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/twp-ayr-rps-ofc-rpt-00014.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible project-specific source reviewed explicitly states hub height for Ayre. Per instruction, hub height is not inferred from tip height, rotor diameter, or a generic turbine platform.


wind_farm_id: 6611
canonical_id: 4c4e4bf3-38e3-4eff-a297-63a4502a3c60
wind_farm_name: Ayre Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 67
resolved_value: Up to 67
research_value: Up to 67
resolved_fact_id: 33973.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/twp-ayr-rps-ofc-rpt-00014.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ayre HRA screening report
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/twp-ayr-rps-ofc-rpt-00014.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Multiple project-specific sources say the proposal comprises up to 67 turbines. This differs from the database validation hint of 0, which likely reflects the project’s pre-construction status and/or a dataset placeholder rather than a web-confirmed design envelope.


wind_farm_id: 6611
canonical_id: 4c4e4bf3-38e3-4eff-a297-63a4502a3c60
wind_farm_name: Ayre Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Floating foundations preferred; planning envelope also retains fixed-foundation options
resolved_value: Floating foundations preferred; planning envelope also retains fixed-foundation options
research_value: Floating foundations preferred; planning envelope also retains fixed-foundation options
resolved_fact_id: 33974.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/twp-ayr-rps-ofc-rpt-00014.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ayre HRA screening report
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/twp-ayr-rps-ofc-rpt-00014.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Ayre is described by Qair and government/project summaries as a floating project. However, the 25/07/2024 HRA screening report says the project design envelope still includes both floating and fixed options, with preferred floating options of semi-submersible and tension leg platforms. Because detailed design is not fixed, this row reflects the current planning envelope rather than an as-selected as-built foundation.


wind_farm_id: 6611
canonical_id: 4c4e4bf3-38e3-4eff-a297-63a4502a3c60
wind_farm_name: Ayre Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Windtech offshore consent submission report
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.windtech-international.com/projects-and-contracts/qair-submits-offshore-consent-application-for-ayre-offshore-wind-farm

research_summary:
Offshore consent has not yet been granted. Onshore planning permission appears to have been approved in March 2026, but the requested project-level consent date is best understood as the offshore generation consent milestone, which remains pending.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.windtech-international.com/projects-and-contracts/qair-submits-offshore-consent-application-for-ayre-offshore-wind-farm


wind_farm_id: 6611
canonical_id: 4c4e4bf3-38e3-4eff-a297-63a4502a3c60
wind_farm_name: Ayre Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Qair onshore consent announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.qair.energy/qair-gains-onshore-consent-for-1-gw-ayre-offshore-wind-farm-pioneering-floating-wind-innovation-from-france-to-the-uk/

research_summary:
No accessible source reviewed confirms FID. Given the project is still in consenting, FID likely has not been taken, but it is safer to record Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6611
canonical_id: 4c4e4bf3-38e3-4eff-a297-63a4502a3c60
wind_farm_name: Ayre Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Scottish Government offshore wind ambition update
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence v3.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No commissioning date is confirmed in accessible sources because the project remains pre-consent offshore.


wind_farm_id: 6612
canonical_id: 811a6595-28c6-4cee-9e15-6e2d07a60da7
wind_farm_name: Stromar
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Stromar Offshore Wind Farm
research_value: Stromar Offshore Wind Farm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Crown Estate Scotland SCDS Outlook PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.crownestatescotland.com/sites/default/files/2023-07/stromar-offshore-wind-farm-scds-outlook-july-2023-update.pdf

research_summary:
Official project branding is “Stromar” / “Stromar Offshore Wind Farm”. Crown Estate Scotland’s ScotWind material and the project website both identify Stromar as the awarded ScotWind project; Crown Estate’s 04/04/2023 SCDS says the project was previously called “Cygnus”.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.crownestatescotland.com/sites/default/files/2023-07/stromar-offshore-wind-farm-scds-outlook-july-2023-update.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6612
canonical_id: 811a6595-28c6-4cee-9e15-6e2d07a60da7
wind_farm_name: Stromar
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 33975.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://stromarwind.co.uk/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Stromar home page
source_of_record_url: https://stromarwind.co.uk/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Stromar Offshore Wind Farm Limited / Stromar JV. Current owners: Nadara, Ørsted, BlueFloat Energy. Ownership percentages: Not confirmed. Operator: Not confirmed.

resolved_value:
Developer: Stromar Offshore Wind Farm Limited / Stromar JV. Current owners: Nadara, Ørsted, BlueFloat Energy. Ownership percentages: Not confirmed. Operator: Not confirmed.

research_summary:
Repaired using accessible project-site pages rather than the previously failed BlueFloat page evidence. The Stromar home page says the project “is led by Nadara”; the project page says “The Joint Venture partners signed an Option Agreement”; and Stromar’s 29/01/2024 release states the JV is Ørsted, BlueFloat Energy and Renantis. Because Nadara is identified on the live site as “formerly Renantis”, the current owner set is Nadara, Ørsted and BlueFloat Energy. No official page found that reconciles percentage shares or identifies a distinct operator, so percentages and operator remain Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6612
canonical_id: 811a6595-28c6-4cee-9e15-6e2d07a60da7
wind_farm_name: Stromar
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://stromarwind.co.uk/793/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Stromar JV announcement
source_of_record_url: https://stromarwind.co.uk/793/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Ørsted + Falck Renewables + BlueFloat Energy JV announced 08/07/2021; Falck Renewables rebranded to Renantis in 11/2022; current project pages show Nadara (formerly Renantis), Ørsted and BlueFloat Energy.

research_value:
Ørsted + Falck Renewables + BlueFloat Energy JV announced 08/07/2021; Falck Renewables rebranded to Renantis in 11/2022; current project pages show Nadara (formerly Renantis), Ørsted and BlueFloat Energy.

research_summary:
The 08/07/2021 project announcement created the original three-way JV. Crown Estate Scotland’s 04/04/2023 SCDS records “Falck Renewables becomes Renantis”. Freshest accessible official owner evidence is the live Stromar/BlueFloat pages, which show Nadara branding rather than Renantis and still indicate a three-party structure, but without percentages.


wind_farm_id: 6612
canonical_id: 811a6595-28c6-4cee-9e15-6e2d07a60da7
wind_farm_name: Stromar
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
research_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_fact_id: 33976.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate scoping opinion PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/stromar_offshore_wind_farm_-_scop_0039_-_scoping_opinion_-_april_2024.pdf

research_summary:
This is beyond simple lease award / pre-planning because Stromar submitted offshore and onshore scoping reports in January 2024 and the Marine Directorate issued a scoping opinion on 29/04/2024. However, no section 36 consent or marine licence application decision was found, so the closest Boundary Layer label is In Planning / Consent Application Submitted; nuance: it is still pre-application/scoping rather than a full consent application determination.

source_of_record_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/stromar_offshore_wind_farm_-_scop_0039_-_scoping_opinion_-_april_2024.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6612
canonical_id: 811a6595-28c6-4cee-9e15-6e2d07a60da7
wind_farm_name: Stromar
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1500 MW
resolved_value: 1500 MW
research_value: 1500 MW
resolved_fact_id: 33977.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.bluefloat.com/project/stromar/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: BlueFloat Energy Stromar project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.bluefloat.com/project/stromar/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
There is a live capacity conflict. Older authoritative/project-specific sources from 2023 and 29/01/2024 describe Stromar as a 1 GW project, while fresher live official project pages now state “up to 1.5GW” and BlueFloat’s project page lists “1,500 MW”. Using the freshest official project pages, 1,500 MW is the best current planned capacity; this differs from the database context 1,000 MW because the project appears to have been upsized during development.


wind_farm_id: 6612
canonical_id: 811a6595-28c6-4cee-9e15-6e2d07a60da7
wind_farm_name: Stromar
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate scoping opinion PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/stromar_offshore_wind_farm_-_scop_0039_-_scoping_opinion_-_april_2024.pdf

research_summary:
No accessible official source found that explicitly states a contracted/export MEC in MW. Available documents confirm up to three export cables and an intended grid connection at New Deer 2, but they do not clearly give a final MEC figure.


wind_farm_id: 6612
canonical_id: 811a6595-28c6-4cee-9e15-6e2d07a60da7
wind_farm_name: Stromar
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate HRA screening report PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/240110_-_scotwind_ne3_-_stromar_-_scoping_-_scoping_opinion_-_hra_screening_report.pdf

research_summary:
Project-specific sources only provide design-envelope maxima rather than a selected turbine model. No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided in the prompt, so no dataset fallback is available here.

source_of_record_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/240110_-_scotwind_ne3_-_stromar_-_scoping_-_scoping_opinion_-_hra_screening_report.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6612
canonical_id: 811a6595-28c6-4cee-9e15-6e2d07a60da7
wind_farm_name: Stromar
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate HRA screening report PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/240110_-_scotwind_ne3_-_stromar_-_scoping_-_scoping_opinion_-_hra_screening_report.pdf

research_summary:
No project-specific official source identified a selected OEM. Sources remain at design-envelope stage only.


wind_farm_id: 6612
canonical_id: 811a6595-28c6-4cee-9e15-6e2d07a60da7
wind_farm_name: Stromar
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate HRA screening report PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No selected turbine rating is confirmed. Project-specific regulatory documents only give a design envelope of turbine power rating up to 30 MW, which is not the same as a chosen turbine rating.


wind_farm_id: 6612
canonical_id: 811a6595-28c6-4cee-9e15-6e2d07a60da7
wind_farm_name: Stromar
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate HRA screening report PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No selected rotor diameter is confirmed for Stromar. Regulatory documents only state a maximum rotor diameter of 320 m within the design envelope.


wind_farm_id: 6612
canonical_id: 811a6595-28c6-4cee-9e15-6e2d07a60da7
wind_farm_name: Stromar
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate HRA screening report PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No selected hub height is confirmed for Stromar. Regulatory documents only state a maximum hub height of 225 m within the design envelope. The prompt says no linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata exists, so the correct output is Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6612
canonical_id: 811a6595-28c6-4cee-9e15-6e2d07a60da7
wind_farm_name: Stromar
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 71
resolved_value: 71
research_value: 71
resolved_fact_id: 33978.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate scoping opinion PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific regulatory sources state a maximum of 71 WTGs / number of WTGs ≤ 71 in the design envelope. This does not align with the database validation hint of 0; the likely reason is that the non-web signal reflects an undeveloped/pre-build dataset count rather than a project planning envelope. A later 2024 consultation notice also says “up to 100 wind turbines”, so there is an internal planning-stage conflict; the Marine Directorate scoping documents are more project-specific and technically detailed for the main offshore design envelope, so 71 is the best-supported current figure.


wind_farm_id: 6612
canonical_id: 811a6595-28c6-4cee-9e15-6e2d07a60da7
wind_farm_name: Stromar
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Floating foundations
resolved_value: Floating foundations
research_value: Floating foundations
resolved_fact_id: 33979.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate scoping opinion PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Multiple official/project-specific sources describe Stromar as a floating offshore wind farm. The Marine Directorate scoping opinion says WTG foundations will consist of floating substructures, while the pre-application consultation notice says “wind turbines with floating foundations”. The scoping opinion adds that fixed-bottom foundations will also be considered, but the core project concept remains floating.


wind_farm_id: 6612
canonical_id: 811a6595-28c6-4cee-9e15-6e2d07a60da7
wind_farm_name: Stromar
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/marine-licence-applications
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate applications listing
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/marine-licence-applications
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No consent decision date was found. Available regulatory sources only cover scoping / pre-application steps.


wind_farm_id: 6612
canonical_id: 811a6595-28c6-4cee-9e15-6e2d07a60da7
wind_farm_name: Stromar
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://stromarwind.co.uk/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Stromar home page
source_of_record_url: https://stromarwind.co.uk/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No FID announcement was found in official project, owner, or regulator sources. Development remains at scoping / consultation stage.


wind_farm_id: 6612
canonical_id: 811a6595-28c6-4cee-9e15-6e2d07a60da7
wind_farm_name: Stromar
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://stromarwind.co.uk/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Stromar home page
source_of_record_url: https://stromarwind.co.uk/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No full commissioning date is confirmed. The planning-stage documents reviewed do not provide a definitive commissioning milestone.


wind_farm_id: 6613
canonical_id: 5a18ba7a-1808-402f-9703-7a0d3cef8515
wind_farm_name: Caledonia Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Caledonia Offshore Wind Farm
research_value: Caledonia Offshore Wind Farm
citation_url: https://www.caledoniaoffshorewind.com/the-project/about-caledonia/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Caledonia Offshore Wind Farm project website
source_of_record_url: https://www.caledoniaoffshorewind.com/the-project/about-caledonia/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official project site and Ocean Winds both identify the project as Caledonia Offshore Wind Farm / Caledonia in the Moray Firth. The 18/10/2024 EIAR guide confirms the offshore consenting structure is split into Caledonia North and Caledonia South as standalone application areas, which resolves the phase/name ambiguity.


wind_farm_id: 6613
canonical_id: 5a18ba7a-1808-402f-9703-7a0d3cef8515
wind_farm_name: Caledonia Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 33996.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Caledonia Offshore Wind Farm project news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Ocean Winds; Current owner(s): Not confirmed beyond Ocean Winds project company; Equity partners: Not confirmed at project level; Operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: Ocean Winds; Current owner(s): Not confirmed beyond Ocean Winds project company; Equity partners: Not confirmed at project level; Operator: Not confirmed

citation_url:
https://www.caledoniaoffshorewind.com/caledonia-offshore-wind-farm-submits-application-for-offshore-planning-consent/

research_summary:
Freshest owner/developer evidence used: the project website footer and Ocean Winds project page crawled recently, plus the 20/11/2024 project news page, all confirm Ocean Winds is developing Caledonia. Ocean Winds itself is described in recent coverage as a 50:50 JV of EDP Renewables and ENGIE, but I did not find a project-specific official page reconciling the full current equity ownership of Caledonia Offshore Wind Farm Ltd; per instruction, project-level ownership percentages are therefore Not confirmed rather than inferred.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.caledoniaoffshorewind.com/caledonia-offshore-wind-farm-submits-application-for-offshore-planning-consent/


wind_farm_id: 6613
canonical_id: 5a18ba7a-1808-402f-9703-7a0d3cef8515
wind_farm_name: Caledonia Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.caledoniaoffshorewind.com/the-project/faq/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Caledonia Offshore Wind Farm FAQ
source_of_record_url: https://www.caledoniaoffshorewind.com/the-project/faq/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
01/01/2022: development rights awarded to Ocean Winds under ScotWind; no later project-level equity transfer confirmed

research_value:
01/01/2022: development rights awarded to Ocean Winds under ScotWind; no later project-level equity transfer confirmed

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on for ownership history is 20/11/2024, where the project states Caledonia “was awarded the site in 2022 as part of the Scottish Government’s ScotWind process.” The FAQ also states 2022: Ocean Winds awarded the rights to develop Caledonia Offshore Wind Farm. No newer dated authoritative project source found that evidences a changed project ownership split.


wind_farm_id: 6613
canonical_id: 5a18ba7a-1808-402f-9703-7a0d3cef8515
wind_farm_name: Caledonia Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
research_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_fact_id: 33997.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Caledonia Offshore Wind Farm project news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.caledoniaoffshorewind.com/caledonia-offshore-wind-farm-submits-application-for-offshore-planning-consent/

research_summary:
This exact Boundary Layer status fits best. The project announced on 20/11/2024 that it had submitted applications for planning consent to the Scottish Government’s Marine Directorate, and Marine Directorate materials show live Section 36 and marine licence applications for Caledonia North and Caledonia South. Aberdeenshire Council’s 03/02/2026 notice on a pre-determination hearing for related onshore transmission infrastructure confirms the planning process remains active rather than consented.


wind_farm_id: 6613
canonical_id: 5a18ba7a-1808-402f-9703-7a0d3cef8515
wind_farm_name: Caledonia Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Caledonia Offshore Wind Farm project news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I found repeated confirmation of 2000 MW generation capacity and evidence of up to four 400 kV cable circuits, but no openly accessible authoritative source reviewed here explicitly labels a separate Maximum Export Capacity (MEC) value for Caledonia. To avoid conflating installed capacity with export capacity, MEC is left Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6613
canonical_id: 5a18ba7a-1808-402f-9703-7a0d3cef8515
wind_farm_name: Caledonia Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Caledonia Offshore Wind Farm project news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The 20/11/2024 application summary confirms only maximum turbine capacity 25 MW. No project-specific accessible source reviewed here names a turbine model for Caledonia North/South, and no linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided in context, so the correct output is Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6613
canonical_id: 5a18ba7a-1808-402f-9703-7a0d3cef8515
wind_farm_name: Caledonia Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 9.5
resolved_value: 9.5
research_value: Up to 25 MW
resolved_fact_id: 41483.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Caledonia Offshore Wind Farm project news
research_source_type: official project website
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
The clearest project-specific figure found is the project’s own 20/11/2024 application summary, which lists “Maximum turbine capacity 25MW.” This is a design-envelope cap, not a selected as-built turbine rating.


wind_farm_id: 6613
canonical_id: 5a18ba7a-1808-402f-9703-7a0d3cef8515
wind_farm_name: Caledonia Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 105
resolved_value: 105
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 41785.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Caledonia EIAR Guide
research_source_type: official project document
research_source_url: https://www.caledoniaoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/EIAR-Guide.pdf
research_source_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific accessible source reviewed here explicitly confirms a Caledonia hub height, and no linked EuroWindWakes turbine fallback was provided.


wind_farm_id: 6613
canonical_id: 5a18ba7a-1808-402f-9703-7a0d3cef8515
wind_farm_name: Caledonia Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 140
resolved_value: Up to 140
research_value: Up to 140
resolved_fact_id: 34000.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.caledoniaoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/EIAR-Guide.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Caledonia EIAR Guide
source_of_record_url: https://www.caledoniaoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/EIAR-Guide.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The strongest project-specific evidence is the 18/10/2024 EIAR Guide, which states the assessment considers up to 77 WTGs in Caledonia North and up to 78 WTG in Caledonia South, but the total will not exceed 140 WTGs. This differs from the database validation signal of 0, which likely reflects that the project is still pre-construction and the dataset has not yet populated a planned turbine count.


wind_farm_id: 6613
canonical_id: 5a18ba7a-1808-402f-9703-7a0d3cef8515
wind_farm_name: Caledonia Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Primarily jacket foundations; floating structures possible in southern part of site
resolved_value: Primarily jacket foundations; floating structures possible in southern part of site
research_value: Primarily jacket foundations; floating structures possible in southern part of site
resolved_fact_id: 34001.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.caledoniaoffshorewind.com/the-project/about-caledonia/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Caledonia Offshore Wind Farm project website
source_of_record_url: https://www.caledoniaoffshorewind.com/the-project/about-caledonia/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project’s “About Caledonia” page says three-quarters of the site allows for fixed foundations and that most of the site can use jacket foundations; the 20/11/2024 submission page adds that there is also an opportunity to deploy floating structures in the south. This supports a mixed design-envelope, with jackets as the main confirmed foundation concept.


wind_farm_id: 6613
canonical_id: 5a18ba7a-1808-402f-9703-7a0d3cef8515
wind_farm_name: Caledonia Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Caledonia timeline PDF
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.caledoniaoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Caledonias-Journey-to-First-Power.pdf

research_summary:
As of the reviewed sources, applications have been submitted but no final offshore Section 36 / marine licence consent date for the wind farm itself was confirmed. The project timeline PDF indicates a 2027 decision expectation, not a granted consent.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.caledoniaoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Caledonias-Journey-to-First-Power.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6613
canonical_id: 5a18ba7a-1808-402f-9703-7a0d3cef8515
wind_farm_name: Caledonia Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.oceanwinds.com/projects/caledonia/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ocean Winds project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.oceanwinds.com/projects/caledonia/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible authoritative source reviewed here confirms that FID has been taken. The project remains in planning/consenting.


wind_farm_id: 6613
canonical_id: 5a18ba7a-1808-402f-9703-7a0d3cef8515
wind_farm_name: Caledonia Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Caledonia timeline PDF
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.caledoniaoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Caledonias-Journey-to-First-Power.pdf

research_summary:
No first power date is confirmed. The project timeline material indicates a planned operational horizon around 2030, but not first power.


wind_farm_id: 6613
canonical_id: 5a18ba7a-1808-402f-9703-7a0d3cef8515
wind_farm_name: Caledonia Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2022-04-01
resolved_value: 2022-04-01
research_value: 01/01/2030
resolved_fact_id: 41936.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Caledonia timeline PDF
research_source_type: official project document
research_source_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
This is a planned operational date, not a commissioned fact. The project timeline PDF says “Caledonia is planned to be operational” by 2030, and third-party reporting on the Wood Thilsted award also states the project is scheduled to be operational by 2030. Year-only evidence normalized to 01/01/2030.


wind_farm_id: 6614
canonical_id: f881ab5f-4cb6-4125-9ffb-765fb8f3b35b
wind_farm_name: Broadshore
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Broadshore Offshore Wind Farm; historic name: Orion
research_value: Broadshore Offshore Wind Farm; historic name: Orion
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Crown Estate Scotland SCDS update PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.crownestatescotland.com/sites/default/files/2023-07/broadshore-offshore-wind-farm-scds-outlook-july-2023-update.pdf

research_summary:
The project SPV’s 2023 SCDS states “Broadshore Offshore Wind Farm (previously ‘Orion’)”. The live project website presents the current name as Broadshore Offshore Wind Farm.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.crownestatescotland.com/sites/default/files/2023-07/broadshore-offshore-wind-farm-scds-outlook-july-2023-update.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6614
canonical_id: f881ab5f-4cb6-4125-9ffb-765fb8f3b35b
wind_farm_name: Broadshore
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34003.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Crown Estate Scotland SCDS update PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Broadshore Offshore Wind Farm Limited; current owners: BlueFloat Energy and Nadara (formerly Renantis), 50% / 50%; operator: Not confirmed separately

resolved_value:
Developer: Broadshore Offshore Wind Farm Limited; current owners: BlueFloat Energy and Nadara (formerly Renantis), 50% / 50%; operator: Not confirmed separately

citation_url:
https://www.crownestatescotland.com/sites/default/files/2023-07/broadshore-offshore-wind-farm-scds-outlook-july-2023-update.pdf

research_summary:
The clearest project-specific ownership evidence is the 2023 Crown Estate Scotland SCDS update: the SPV is “owned equally by BlueFloat Energy and Renantis”. Freshness check: Nadara’s live portfolio page for Broadshore and Nadara’s 03/07/2024 brand-launch announcement confirm Renantis became part of Nadara in 2024. No separate operating company was clearly confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6614
canonical_id: f881ab5f-4cb6-4125-9ffb-765fb8f3b35b
wind_farm_name: Broadshore
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Nadara brand launch
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Initially developed by the BlueFloat Energy / Renantis partnership; Renantis rebranded into Nadara in 2024; current economic ownership remains 50% / 50% on available evidence

research_value:
Initially developed by the BlueFloat Energy / Renantis partnership; Renantis rebranded into Nadara in 2024; current economic ownership remains 50% / 50% on available evidence

citation_url:
https://nadara.com/news/international-renewable-energy-ipp-nadara-announces-strategy-to-scale-business-as-it-launches-new-brand

research_summary:
Crown Estate Scotland’s 2023 SCDS update says Broadshore was previously named Orion and was owned equally by BlueFloat Energy and Renantis; the same document notes “In November 2022, Falck Renewables began its evolution into Renantis.” Freshest ownership-related source relied on is Nadara’s 03/07/2024 corporate announcement confirming the Renantis-to-Nadara transition. No later source found showing a stake sale or changed percentages.

source_of_record_url:
https://nadara.com/news/international-renewable-energy-ipp-nadara-announces-strategy-to-scale-business-as-it-launches-new-brand


wind_farm_id: 6614
canonical_id: f881ab5f-4cb6-4125-9ffb-765fb8f3b35b
wind_farm_name: Broadshore
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
research_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_fact_id: 34004.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate scoping opinion PDF
source_of_record_licence: public sector information / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project has moved beyond mere lease award: the Marine Directorate scoping opinion records receipt of the scoping report on 08/01/2024, and the project site says scoping requests were submitted in 2024 with consent applications expected later. Because a scoping request is part of the consent pathway but no full consent application decision is evidenced yet, the closest exact Boundary Layer label is In Planning / Consent Application Submitted.


wind_farm_id: 6614
canonical_id: f881ab5f-4cb6-4125-9ffb-765fb8f3b35b
wind_farm_name: Broadshore
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 900 MW
resolved_value: 900 MW
research_value: 900 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34005.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://broadshorewind.co.uk/the-project/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Broadshore project page
source_of_record_url: https://broadshorewind.co.uk/the-project/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The live project page states “proposed installed capacity of 900 MW”. Nadara’s current portfolio page also lists Broadshore at 900 MW. This differs from the supplied database context of 500 MW and appears to reflect project evolution after earlier lease-stage assumptions.


wind_farm_id: 6614
canonical_id: f881ab5f-4cb6-4125-9ffb-765fb8f3b35b
wind_farm_name: Broadshore
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://broadshorewind.co.uk/the-project/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Broadshore project page
source_of_record_url: https://broadshorewind.co.uk/the-project/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I found no openly accessible project-specific or regulator source that explicitly states Broadshore’s MEC/export capacity as a distinct figure from installed capacity. The website only gives installed capacity and a possible Peterhead grid vicinity assumption.


