# wind_farm_dossier_fields

wind_farm_id: 6315
canonical_id: d9d551d5-c501-4409-8588-c118e053d885
wind_farm_name: Warberg Offshore Wind
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://web.archive.org/web/20260119115356/https://www.nordicoffshorewind.com/projects
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Nordic Offshore Wind project page (Wayback archive 19/01/2026)
source_of_record_url: https://web.archive.org/web/20260119115356/https://www.nordicoffshorewind.com/projects
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided, so dataset fallback is unavailable. The available project pages do not specify turbine unit rating for this project.


wind_farm_id: 6315
canonical_id: d9d551d5-c501-4409-8588-c118e053d885
wind_farm_name: Warberg Offshore Wind
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Hallands Nyheter 01/04/2023, updated 09/03/2024
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided, so dataset fallback is unavailable. No project-specific source found an explicit rotor diameter for Warberg Offshore Wind.


wind_farm_id: 6315
canonical_id: d9d551d5-c501-4409-8588-c118e053d885
wind_farm_name: Warberg Offshore Wind
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Hallands Nyheter 01/04/2023, updated 09/03/2024
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided, so dataset fallback is unavailable. The municipal protocol gives only “maximal höjd på 275 meter ovan vattenytan”, which is total tip height above water, not hub height, so hub height remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6315
canonical_id: d9d551d5-c501-4409-8588-c118e053d885
wind_farm_name: Warberg Offshore Wind
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 35–50 planned; more specific consultation figure: up to 42
resolved_value: 35–50 planned; more specific consultation figure: up to 42
research_value: 35–50 planned; more specific consultation figure: up to 42
resolved_fact_id: 43051.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://web.archive.org/web/20260119115356/https://www.nordicoffshorewind.com/projects
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Nordic Offshore Wind project page (Wayback archive 19/01/2026)
source_of_record_url: https://web.archive.org/web/20260119115356/https://www.nordicoffshorewind.com/projects
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Nordic Offshore Wind’s page says “Number of WTGs: 35-50”. Varberg municipality’s 26/09/2023 protocol says the consultation proposal covers “maximalt 42 vindkraftverk”. This differs from the database validation signal of 0 turbines; the web evidence strongly indicates the database value is an outdated placeholder for an unbuilt concept-stage project rather than an actual zero-turbine design.


wind_farm_id: 6315
canonical_id: d9d551d5-c501-4409-8588-c118e053d885
wind_farm_name: Warberg Offshore Wind
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Bottom-fixed foundations; exact type Not confirmed
resolved_value: Bottom-fixed foundations; exact type Not confirmed
research_value: Bottom-fixed foundations; exact type Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 43052.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Hallands Nyheter 01/04/2023, updated 09/03/2024
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The 26/09/2023 municipal protocol states the turbines “kommer att fästas på fundament på havsbotten”, confirming seabed-fixed foundations rather than floating. No project-specific source found the exact subtype such as monopile, jacket, or gravity base.


wind_farm_id: 6315
canonical_id: d9d551d5-c501-4409-8588-c118e053d885
wind_farm_name: Warberg Offshore Wind
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Hallands Nyheter 01/04/2023, updated 09/03/2024
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No consent / permit award date found. Sources indicate consultation and planning activity, not an issued final consent.


wind_farm_id: 6315
canonical_id: d9d551d5-c501-4409-8588-c118e053d885
wind_farm_name: Warberg Offshore Wind
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://web.archive.org/web/20260119115356/https://www.nordicoffshorewind.com/projects
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Nordic Offshore Wind project page (Wayback archive 19/01/2026)
source_of_record_url: https://web.archive.org/web/20260119115356/https://www.nordicoffshorewind.com/projects
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No evidence found of FID, major construction contracts, or financing close. The project remains in planning / permit development.


wind_farm_id: 6316
canonical_id: 21a130d2-78a9-4143-9d82-93b5a71e83e2
wind_farm_name: Baltic offshore Delta South
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Statkraft project memo 10/11/2023
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Baltic Offshore Delta South (marketed by Statkraft as Delta South); historic umbrella name: Baltic Offshore Delta

research_value:
Baltic Offshore Delta South (marketed by Statkraft as Delta South); historic umbrella name: Baltic Offshore Delta

citation_url:
https://www.statkraft.se/globalassets/0/.se/om-statkraft/anlaggningar/delta/pm-baltic-offshore-delta-ns.pdf

research_summary:
Statkraft’s current project page uses “Delta South”. Statkraft’s dated memo of 10/11/2023 says the earlier Baltic Offshore Delta project area was split into two separate projects, Delta Nord and Delta Syd, confirming this is a distinct target identity rather than Delta North.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.statkraft.se/globalassets/0/.se/om-statkraft/anlaggningar/delta/pm-baltic-offshore-delta-ns.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6316
canonical_id: 21a130d2-78a9-4143-9d82-93b5a71e83e2
wind_farm_name: Baltic offshore Delta South
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Developer: Njordr Offshore Wind AB originally; current developer/owner: Statkraft
resolved_value: Developer: Njordr Offshore Wind AB originally; current developer/owner: Statkraft
research_value: Developer: Njordr Offshore Wind AB originally; current developer/owner: Statkraft
resolved_fact_id: 43063.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Statkraft project memo 10/11/2023
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.statkraft.se/globalassets/0/.se/om-statkraft/anlaggningar/delta/pm-baltic-offshore-delta-ns.pdf

research_summary:
Statkraft’s 10/11/2023 project memo says the consultation was carried out by Njordr Offshore Wind and that the company has now been acquired by Statkraft, which is driving the project onward. The freshest dated source relied on is Statkraft’s 04/11/2024 press release, which still treats Delta South as one of Statkraft’s Baltic projects. No authoritative source found confirming additional equity partners.


wind_farm_id: 6316
canonical_id: 21a130d2-78a9-4143-9d82-93b5a71e83e2
wind_farm_name: Baltic offshore Delta South
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Statkraft project memo 10/11/2023
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Njordr Offshore Wind AB project originally; transferred into Statkraft portfolio in 10/2023; current ownership split: Not confirmed; operator: Not confirmed

research_value:
Njordr Offshore Wind AB project originally; transferred into Statkraft portfolio in 10/2023; current ownership split: Not confirmed; operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
Statkraft’s 10/11/2023 memo says the consultation was carried out by Njordr Offshore Wind and that Statkraft now drives the project onward after acquisition. The freshest dated source relied on for current position is 04/11/2024 Statkraft, but it does not disclose percentages or a separate operator, so ownership split and operator remain Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6316
canonical_id: 21a130d2-78a9-4143-9d82-93b5a71e83e2
wind_farm_name: Baltic offshore Delta South
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Concept
resolved_value: Concept
research_value: Concept
resolved_fact_id: 43064.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Finnish environmental administration page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.ymparisto.fi/fi/osallistu-ja-vaikuta/ymparistovaikutusten-arviointi/baltic-offshore-delta-merituulivoimapuisto-ruotsi

research_summary:
Delta South has not yet been evidenced as having a submitted permit application. Statkraft says “Tillståndsansökan väntas till 2025”, while the Finnish environmental authority page updated 11/09/2025 says Delta South’s permit application was intended for 2024–2025 and that the 04/11/2024 rejection did not concern Delta South. Closest Boundary Layer label: Concept.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.ymparisto.fi/fi/osallistu-ja-vaikuta/ymparistovaikutusten-arviointi/baltic-offshore-delta-merituulivoimapuisto-ruotsi


wind_farm_id: 6316
canonical_id: 21a130d2-78a9-4143-9d82-93b5a71e83e2
wind_farm_name: Baltic offshore Delta South
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 3,200 MW (planned)
resolved_value: 3,200 MW (planned)
research_value: 3,200 MW (planned)
resolved_fact_id: 43065.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Statkraft project memo 10/11/2023
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Statkraft’s dated 10/11/2023 memo gives Delta Syd planned installed capacity of about 3,200 MW. Statkraft’s current Delta South page also describes up to 160 turbines, consistent with that project split.


wind_farm_id: 6316
canonical_id: 21a130d2-78a9-4143-9d82-93b5a71e83e2
wind_farm_name: Baltic offshore Delta South
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Svenska kraftnät offshore connection overview
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.svk.se/utveckling-av-kraftsystemet/transmissionsnatet/anslutning-av-havsbaserad-vindkraft/anslutningsmojligheter/

research_summary:
No open project-specific source found that states a defined MEC/export capacity for Delta South. Available sources confirm planned installed capacity and development status, but not a project MEC.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.svk.se/utveckling-av-kraftsystemet/transmissionsnatet/anslutning-av-havsbaserad-vindkraft/anslutningsmojligheter/


wind_farm_id: 6316
canonical_id: 21a130d2-78a9-4143-9d82-93b5a71e83e2
wind_farm_name: Baltic offshore Delta South
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Statkraft project memo 10/11/2023
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided, so no dataset fallback is available under the Stage 3 rule. Web sources only indicate that floating turbines are expected to play a significant role; no project-specific turbine model was confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6316
canonical_id: 21a130d2-78a9-4143-9d82-93b5a71e83e2
wind_farm_name: Baltic offshore Delta South
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Statkraft project memo 10/11/2023
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided, and no project-specific OEM announcement was found.


wind_farm_id: 6316
canonical_id: 21a130d2-78a9-4143-9d82-93b5a71e83e2
wind_farm_name: Baltic offshore Delta South
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Statkraft project memo 10/11/2023
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided. Project-specific web sources do not state per-turbine rating for Delta South.


wind_farm_id: 6316
canonical_id: 21a130d2-78a9-4143-9d82-93b5a71e83e2
wind_farm_name: Baltic offshore Delta South
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Statkraft project memo 10/11/2023
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided, and no project-specific rotor diameter was found.


wind_farm_id: 6316
canonical_id: 21a130d2-78a9-4143-9d82-93b5a71e83e2
wind_farm_name: Baltic offshore Delta South
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Statkraft project memo 10/11/2023
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided. Statkraft’s memo gives a maximum total height of 330 m, which is not the same as hub height, so hub height remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6316
canonical_id: 21a130d2-78a9-4143-9d82-93b5a71e83e2
wind_farm_name: Baltic offshore Delta South
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 160 (planned maximum)
resolved_value: Up to 160 (planned maximum)
research_value: Up to 160 (planned maximum)
resolved_fact_id: 43066.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Statkraft project memo 10/11/2023
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Statkraft’s current project page and the dated 10/11/2023 memo both state up to/max 160 turbines. This differs from the database validation signal of 0 from EMODnet; likely reason is that the EMODnet row reflects an early concept/placeholder state, while current project-specific sources describe the post-split Delta South scope.


wind_farm_id: 6316
canonical_id: 21a130d2-78a9-4143-9d82-93b5a71e83e2
wind_farm_name: Baltic offshore Delta South
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Floating foundations expected to play a significant role; exact foundation type mix Not confirmed
resolved_value: Floating foundations expected to play a significant role; exact foundation type mix Not confirmed
research_value: Floating foundations expected to play a significant role; exact foundation type mix Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 43067.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Statkraft project memo 10/11/2023
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Statkraft says floating turbines are expected to play a significant role, and the 10/11/2023 memo says Delta South requires floating foundations. No open project-specific source was found that finalizes exact floating substructure type or any fixed/floating mix, so that remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6316
canonical_id: 21a130d2-78a9-4143-9d82-93b5a71e83e2
wind_farm_name: Baltic offshore Delta South
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Finnish environmental administration page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.ymparisto.fi/fi/osallistu-ja-vaikuta/ymparistovaikutusten-arviointi/baltic-offshore-delta-merituulivoimapuisto-ruotsi

research_summary:
No consent was identified. Sources indicate that Delta South had not yet reached a granted-permit stage and may not yet have had its own application decided.


wind_farm_id: 6316
canonical_id: 21a130d2-78a9-4143-9d82-93b5a71e83e2
wind_farm_name: Baltic offshore Delta South
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Finnish environmental administration page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No FID announcement found; project remains pre-application / early development in the available sources.


wind_farm_id: 6317
canonical_id: 3068f2fc-7ea4-4734-8a57-b1446ebbd13c
wind_farm_name: Gävle Öst Havsvindpark
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Gävle Öst Havsvindpark; alternative name seen in English: Gävle East
research_value: Gävle Öst Havsvindpark; alternative name seen in English: Gävle East
citation_url: https://orsted.se/vara-grona-losningar/havsbaserad-vindkraft/vara-projekt/gavle-ost-havsvindpark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted project page
source_of_record_url: https://orsted.se/vara-grona-losningar/havsbaserad-vindkraft/vara-projekt/gavle-ost-havsvindpark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Ørsted’s project page and Sweden’s government status page both use Gävle Öst Havsvindpark. An English rendering Gävle East appears in secondary sources, but the exact Swedish project name is the supported target identity.


wind_farm_id: 6317
canonical_id: 3068f2fc-7ea4-4734-8a57-b1446ebbd13c
wind_farm_name: Gävle Öst Havsvindpark
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 43068.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://orsted.se/vara-grona-losningar/havsbaserad-vindkraft/vara-projekt/gavle-ost-havsvindpark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted project page
source_of_record_url: https://orsted.se/vara-grona-losningar/havsbaserad-vindkraft/vara-projekt/gavle-ost-havsvindpark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Ørsted via project company Gävle EW AB; current owner(s): Not confirmed beyond Ørsted control; operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: Ørsted via project company Gävle EW AB; current owner(s): Not confirmed beyond Ørsted control; operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
Ørsted’s project page states “Bolaget är ett dotterbolag till danska Ørsted Wind Power A/S” for Gävle EW AB. No newer dated official source was found showing any JV partner, sale, or separate operator; freshest dated authoritative ownership-related source relied on is 13/03/2026 from Länsstyrelsen naming Gävle EW AB as applicant, supported by Ørsted’s project page.


wind_farm_id: 6317
canonical_id: 3068f2fc-7ea4-4734-8a57-b1446ebbd13c
wind_farm_name: Gävle Öst Havsvindpark
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Länsstyrelsen Gävleborg news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Not confirmed evidence of any ownership transfer; project remains presented as Ørsted-developed through Gävle EW AB

research_value:
Not confirmed evidence of any ownership transfer; project remains presented as Ørsted-developed through Gävle EW AB

citation_url:
https://www.lansstyrelsen.se/gavleborg/om-oss/nyheter-och-press/nyheter/nyheter---gavleborg/2026-03-13-forslag-om-avvisning-angaende-gavle-ost-havsvindpark.html

research_summary:
No authoritative source found showing any ownership change or equity split. Freshest source date relied on is 13/03/2026 (Länsstyrelsen: applicant Gävle EW AB); Ørsted’s own page continues to describe the project as its development.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.lansstyrelsen.se/gavleborg/om-oss/nyheter-och-press/nyheter/nyheter---gavleborg/2026-03-13-forslag-om-avvisning-angaende-gavle-ost-havsvindpark.html


wind_farm_id: 6317
canonical_id: 3068f2fc-7ea4-4734-8a57-b1446ebbd13c
wind_farm_name: Gävle Öst Havsvindpark
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
research_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_fact_id: 43069.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.regeringen.se/regeringens-politik/miljo-och-klimat/havsbaserad-vindkraft/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Regeringen.se offshore wind status page
source_of_record_url: https://www.regeringen.se/regeringens-politik/miljo-och-klimat/havsbaserad-vindkraft/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project has a formal application on file: Regeringen lists it as “Under beredning hos Länsstyrelsen i Gävleborgs län” with application date 30/10/2024; Länsstyrelsen says it has applied for consent and in March 2026 the county board proposed rejection/avvisning. Closest Boundary Layer label is In Planning / Consent Application Submitted because no consent has been granted.


wind_farm_id: 6317
canonical_id: 3068f2fc-7ea4-4734-8a57-b1446ebbd13c
wind_farm_name: Gävle Öst Havsvindpark
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 4860 MW (planned, up to)
resolved_value: 4860 MW (planned, up to)
research_value: 4860 MW (planned, up to)
resolved_fact_id: 43070.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Länsstyrelsen Gävleborg news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.lansstyrelsen.se/gavleborg/om-oss/nyheter-och-press/nyheter/nyheter---gavleborg/2026-03-13-forslag-om-avvisning-angaende-gavle-ost-havsvindpark.html

research_summary:
Capacity is consistently given as up to 4860 MW by Ørsted and Länsstyrelsen. This aligns with the EMODnet fallback context.


wind_farm_id: 6317
canonical_id: 3068f2fc-7ea4-4734-8a57-b1446ebbd13c
wind_farm_name: Gävle Öst Havsvindpark
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted consultation PDF
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://cdn.orsted.com/-/media/www/docs/corp/se/samradsunderlag-avgransningssamrd-gavle-ost-havsvindpark-08631661a.pdf?hash=1D4192D4B3F41C760916672805A9FC8C&rev=652941771cc7431c9a605f48e9a87109

research_summary:
No accessible authoritative source found stating project MEC/export capacity. The reviewed sources discuss installed capacity and note export cables are handled in a separate process, but do not state an MEC value.

source_of_record_url:
https://cdn.orsted.com/-/media/www/docs/corp/se/samradsunderlag-avgransningssamrd-gavle-ost-havsvindpark-08631661a.pdf?hash=1D4192D4B3F41C760916672805A9FC8C&rev=652941771cc7431c9a605f48e9a87109


wind_farm_id: 6317
canonical_id: 3068f2fc-7ea4-4734-8a57-b1446ebbd13c
wind_farm_name: Gävle Öst Havsvindpark
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted consultation PDF
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://cdn.orsted.com/-/media/www/docs/corp/se/samradsunderlag-avgransningssamrd-gavle-ost-havsvindpark-08631661a.pdf?hash=1D4192D4B3F41C760916672805A9FC8C&rev=652941771cc7431c9a605f48e9a87109

research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided, so no dataset fallback applied. Project-specific web sources only describe design envelopes/example layouts, not a selected turbine model.


wind_farm_id: 6317
canonical_id: 3068f2fc-7ea4-4734-8a57-b1446ebbd13c
wind_farm_name: Gävle Öst Havsvindpark
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted consultation PDF
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided, so no dataset fallback applied. No project-specific authoritative source identifies an OEM.


wind_farm_id: 6317
canonical_id: 3068f2fc-7ea4-4734-8a57-b1446ebbd13c
wind_farm_name: Gävle Öst Havsvindpark
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted consultation PDF
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided, so no dataset fallback applied. The project remains at envelope/application stage and no per-turbine rating is stated in the accessible project-specific sources.


wind_farm_id: 6317
canonical_id: 3068f2fc-7ea4-4734-8a57-b1446ebbd13c
wind_farm_name: Gävle Öst Havsvindpark
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 320 m (maximum design parameter, not selected turbine spec)
resolved_value: 320 m (maximum design parameter, not selected turbine spec)
research_value: 320 m (maximum design parameter, not selected turbine spec)
resolved_fact_id: 43071.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted consultation PDF
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided. Ørsted’s consultation material gives a project-specific design envelope: “Rotordiameter (m) 320 m” under maximum design parameters. This is a project-specific planning maximum, not an as-selected turbine specification.


wind_farm_id: 6317
canonical_id: 3068f2fc-7ea4-4734-8a57-b1446ebbd13c
wind_farm_name: Gävle Öst Havsvindpark
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted consultation PDF
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided, so no dataset fallback applied. Accessible project-specific sources state total height and rotor diameter envelopes, but not hub height; hub height was therefore not inferred.


wind_farm_id: 6317
canonical_id: 3068f2fc-7ea4-4734-8a57-b1446ebbd13c
wind_farm_name: Gävle Öst Havsvindpark
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 324
resolved_value: Up to 324
research_value: Up to 324
resolved_fact_id: 43072.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Länsstyrelsen Gävleborg news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Länsstyrelsen and Ørsted’s project-specific consultation documents both support up to 324 turbines. This differs from the validation signal/database winner candidate of 0; likely reason is that the database row is stale or geometry-level fallback while the current web sources reflect the submitted application scope.


wind_farm_id: 6317
canonical_id: 3068f2fc-7ea4-4734-8a57-b1446ebbd13c
wind_farm_name: Gävle Öst Havsvindpark
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 43073.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted consultation PDF
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Monopile, jacket/lattice, suction bucket, or gravity base all under consideration; final type not selected

resolved_value:
Monopile, jacket/lattice, suction bucket, or gravity base all under consideration; final type not selected

research_summary:
Ørsted’s consultation document says final foundation choice will be made during detailed design and lists monopilefundament, fackverksfundament, sugkassunfundament eller gravitationsfundament. Therefore the project-specific answer is a set of candidate foundation types, not a confirmed final design.


wind_farm_id: 6317
canonical_id: 3068f2fc-7ea4-4734-8a57-b1446ebbd13c
wind_farm_name: Gävle Öst Havsvindpark
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.regeringen.se/regeringens-politik/miljo-och-klimat/havsbaserad-vindkraft/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Regeringen.se offshore wind status page
source_of_record_url: https://www.regeringen.se/regeringens-politik/miljo-och-klimat/havsbaserad-vindkraft/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No consent decision date exists in the sources reviewed. Regeringen lists the project under applications under preparation, and Länsstyrelsen states a proposed rejection/avvisning was sent onward in March 2026.


wind_farm_id: 6318
canonical_id: 1e68cae0-a38f-44c9-aa5c-46dae87729a4
wind_farm_name: Baltic Offshore Beta
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Ymer; alternative / historic names: Not confirmed
research_value: Ymer; alternative / historic names: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://mst.dk/media/icfie0mq/samraadsunderlag-vindkraftpark-ymer-svensk.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE consultation document
source_of_record_url: https://mst.dk/media/icfie0mq/samraadsunderlag-vindkraftpark-ymer-svensk.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
RWE consultation material and the German BSH transboundary notice both refer to the project specifically as Ymer / Ymer wind farm in the southern Baltic Sea, about 47 km southeast of Blekinge. No credible source found showing a prior or alternate official project name.


wind_farm_id: 6318
canonical_id: 1e68cae0-a38f-44c9-aa5c-46dae87729a4
wind_farm_name: Baltic Offshore Beta
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 43074.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SMHI consultation response
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: RWE Renewables Sweden AB; current owner(s): Not confirmed beyond RWE development control; equity partners and ownership percentages: Not confirmed; operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: RWE Renewables Sweden AB; current owner(s): Not confirmed beyond RWE development control; equity partners and ownership percentages: Not confirmed; operator: Not confirmed

citation_url:
https://www.smhi.se/om-smhi/regeringsuppdrag-och-remissvar/remissvar/remisser/2024-05-21-yttrande-over---samrad-om-den-havsbaserade-vindkraftparken-ymer

research_summary:
Freshest ownership/developer evidence relied on is the SMHI page updated 05/11/2024, which names Sweco Sverige AB/RWE Renewables Sweden AB as sender for the Ymer consultation. No project-specific official source found listing a JV or ownership percentages, so these remain Not confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.smhi.se/om-smhi/regeringsuppdrag-och-remissvar/remissvar/remisser/2024-05-21-yttrande-over---samrad-om-den-havsbaserade-vindkraftparken-ymer


wind_farm_id: 6318
canonical_id: 1e68cae0-a38f-44c9-aa5c-46dae87729a4
wind_farm_name: Baltic Offshore Beta
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SMHI consultation response
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.smhi.se/om-smhi/regeringsuppdrag-och-remissvar/remissvar/remisser/2024-05-21-yttrande-over---samrad-om-den-havsbaserade-vindkraftparken-ymer

research_summary:
No authoritative project-specific source found showing any transfer history, JV formation, or equity sale for Ymer. Freshest dated project-specific evidence still points only to RWE as developer during 2024 consultation.


wind_farm_id: 6318
canonical_id: 1e68cae0-a38f-44c9-aa5c-46dae87729a4
wind_farm_name: Baltic Offshore Beta
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
research_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_fact_id: 43075.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://mst.dk/media/icfie0mq/samraadsunderlag-vindkraftpark-ymer-svensk.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE consultation document
source_of_record_url: https://mst.dk/media/icfie0mq/samraadsunderlag-vindkraftpark-ymer-svensk.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project is beyond pure concept: RWE issued consultation material in 2024 explicitly stating it is background for an upcoming permit application in Sweden’s EEZ, and cross-border EIA consultation was launched in May 2024. However, no definitive official evidence was found that the full permit has already been granted, so the closest Boundary Layer label is In Planning / Consent Application Submitted; nuance: available official evidence clearly shows formal pre-application / EIA consultation, while the precise submission date of the full permit application is not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6318
canonical_id: 1e68cae0-a38f-44c9-aa5c-46dae87729a4
wind_farm_name: Baltic Offshore Beta
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 4,000 MW
resolved_value: Up to 4,000 MW
research_value: Up to 4,000 MW
resolved_fact_id: 43076.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://mst.dk/media/icfie0mq/samraadsunderlag-vindkraftpark-ymer-svensk.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE consultation document
source_of_record_url: https://mst.dk/media/icfie0mq/samraadsunderlag-vindkraftpark-ymer-svensk.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Both the RWE consultation document and the BSH notice state planned total capacity of up to around 4 GW.


wind_farm_id: 6318
canonical_id: 1e68cae0-a38f-44c9-aa5c-46dae87729a4
wind_farm_name: Baltic Offshore Beta
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://mst.dk/media/e01lw0ma/samraadsunderlag-vindkraftpark-ymer_engelsk-oeversaettning.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE English consultation document
source_of_record_url: https://mst.dk/media/e01lw0ma/samraadsunderlag-vindkraftpark-ymer_engelsk-oeversaettning.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The consultation material says export will be via offshore substations or converter stations and that HVAC/HVDC choice and grid connection point will be determined later; no explicit MEC figure was found.


wind_farm_id: 6318
canonical_id: 1e68cae0-a38f-44c9-aa5c-46dae87729a4
wind_farm_name: Baltic Offshore Beta
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://mst.dk/media/e01lw0ma/samraadsunderlag-vindkraftpark-ymer_engelsk-oeversaettning.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE English consultation document
source_of_record_url: https://mst.dk/media/e01lw0ma/samraadsunderlag-vindkraftpark-ymer_engelsk-oeversaettning.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided in the project context, so Stage 3 dataset fallback was unavailable. Project-specific consultation material gives only envelope parameters, not OEM/model.


wind_farm_id: 6318
canonical_id: 1e68cae0-a38f-44c9-aa5c-46dae87729a4
wind_farm_name: Baltic Offshore Beta
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://mst.dk/media/e01lw0ma/samraadsunderlag-vindkraftpark-ymer_engelsk-oeversaettning.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE English consultation document
source_of_record_url: https://mst.dk/media/e01lw0ma/samraadsunderlag-vindkraftpark-ymer_engelsk-oeversaettning.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided in the project context, so Stage 3 dataset fallback was unavailable. No project-specific web source found naming an OEM.


wind_farm_id: 6318
canonical_id: 1e68cae0-a38f-44c9-aa5c-46dae87729a4
wind_farm_name: Baltic Offshore Beta
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://mst.dk/media/icfie0mq/samraadsunderlag-vindkraftpark-ymer-svensk.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE consultation document
source_of_record_url: https://mst.dk/media/icfie0mq/samraadsunderlag-vindkraftpark-ymer-svensk.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided in the project context, so Stage 3 dataset fallback was unavailable. Capacity and max turbine count imply only a broad range, which must not be inferred as a confirmed turbine rating.


wind_farm_id: 6318
canonical_id: 1e68cae0-a38f-44c9-aa5c-46dae87729a4
wind_farm_name: Baltic Offshore Beta
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://mst.dk/media/e01lw0ma/samraadsunderlag-vindkraftpark-ymer_engelsk-oeversaettning.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE English consultation document
source_of_record_url: https://mst.dk/media/e01lw0ma/samraadsunderlag-vindkraftpark-ymer_engelsk-oeversaettning.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided in the project context, so Stage 3 dataset fallback was unavailable. No project-specific source found with a rotor diameter.


wind_farm_id: 6318
canonical_id: 1e68cae0-a38f-44c9-aa5c-46dae87729a4
wind_farm_name: Baltic Offshore Beta
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://mst.dk/media/e01lw0ma/samraadsunderlag-vindkraftpark-ymer_engelsk-oeversaettning.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE English consultation document
source_of_record_url: https://mst.dk/media/e01lw0ma/samraadsunderlag-vindkraftpark-ymer_engelsk-oeversaettning.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided in the project context, so Stage 3 dataset fallback was unavailable. Sources only give total turbine height up to 360 m and rotor clearance range, which is insufficient to confirm hub height.


wind_farm_id: 6318
canonical_id: 1e68cae0-a38f-44c9-aa5c-46dae87729a4
wind_farm_name: Baltic Offshore Beta
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 270
resolved_value: Up to 270
research_value: Up to 270
resolved_fact_id: 43077.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://mst.dk/media/icfie0mq/samraadsunderlag-vindkraftpark-ymer-svensk.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE consultation document
source_of_record_url: https://mst.dk/media/icfie0mq/samraadsunderlag-vindkraftpark-ymer-svensk.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
RWE and BSH both state up to 270 turbines. This differs from the non-web validation signal of 0 in the fallback database; likely reason is that the database row is stale / placeholder while 2024 consultation documents now describe a live large-scale plan.


wind_farm_id: 6318
canonical_id: 1e68cae0-a38f-44c9-aa5c-46dae87729a4
wind_farm_name: Baltic Offshore Beta
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Fixed-bottom or floating; final type not confirmed
resolved_value: Fixed-bottom or floating; final type not confirmed
research_value: Fixed-bottom or floating; final type not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 43078.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://mst.dk/media/e01lw0ma/samraadsunderlag-vindkraftpark-ymer_engelsk-oeversaettning.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE English consultation document
source_of_record_url: https://mst.dk/media/e01lw0ma/samraadsunderlag-vindkraftpark-ymer_engelsk-oeversaettning.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project documentation explicitly discusses both fixed-bottom and floating installation routes and does not lock the project to one final foundation concept. Therefore the confirmed position is that foundation type remains open rather than a single as-chosen type.


wind_farm_id: 6318
canonical_id: 1e68cae0-a38f-44c9-aa5c-46dae87729a4
wind_farm_name: Baltic Offshore Beta
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://mst.dk/media/icfie0mq/samraadsunderlag-vindkraftpark-ymer-svensk.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE consultation document
source_of_record_url: https://mst.dk/media/icfie0mq/samraadsunderlag-vindkraftpark-ymer-svensk.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No permit grant date found. The 2024 documentation is consultation material ahead of a future permit application, not a consent decision.


wind_farm_id: 6318
canonical_id: 1e68cae0-a38f-44c9-aa5c-46dae87729a4
wind_farm_name: Baltic Offshore Beta
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SMHI consultation response
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific FID announcement found from RWE or Swedish authorities. Project remains in development / permitting.


wind_farm_id: 6318
canonical_id: 1e68cae0-a38f-44c9-aa5c-46dae87729a4
wind_farm_name: Baltic Offshore Beta
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://mst.dk/media/e01lw0ma/samraadsunderlag-vindkraftpark-ymer_engelsk-oeversaettning.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE English consultation document
source_of_record_url: https://mst.dk/media/e01lw0ma/samraadsunderlag-vindkraftpark-ymer_engelsk-oeversaettning.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No commissioning date found; the consultation material only gives broad planning and construction-duration indications, not an operational date.


wind_farm_id: 6320
canonical_id: 35e5ad94-9fb2-4bf5-aac1-cdf28f721ab0
wind_farm_name: Baltic Edge
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Baltic Edge
research_value: Baltic Edge
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Landinfra Energy press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.landinfra-energy.com/landinfra-fortsatter-satsning-pa-havsbaserad-vindkraft-inleder-samradsprocessen-for-ytterligare-tre-projekt-i-sverige/

research_summary:
Web sources consistently identify the target as Baltic Edge, an offshore wind project in Sweden southeast of Blekinge in Sweden’s EEZ. I found no authoritative evidence of an alternative historic official name for this exact project.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.landinfra-energy.com/landinfra-fortsatter-satsning-pa-havsbaserad-vindkraft-inleder-samradsprocessen-for-ytterligare-tre-projekt-i-sverige/


wind_farm_id: 6320
canonical_id: 35e5ad94-9fb2-4bf5-aac1-cdf28f721ab0
wind_farm_name: Baltic Edge
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 43091.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.landinfra-energy.com/en/projects/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Landinfra projects page
source_of_record_url: https://www.landinfra-energy.com/en/projects/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Landinfra Energy AB; Current owner(s): Landinfra Energy AB; Equity partners and percentages: Not confirmed; Operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: Landinfra Energy AB; Current owner(s): Landinfra Energy AB; Equity partners and percentages: Not confirmed; Operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on: 14/04/2026 Landinfra projects page still lists Baltic Edge in its portfolio, and Landinfra’s 17/10/2024 press release says it is initiating the consultation process for Baltic Edge. No current project-specific official source found that sets out a wider ownership split or a separate operator, so those remain Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6320
canonical_id: 35e5ad94-9fb2-4bf5-aac1-cdf28f721ab0
wind_farm_name: Baltic Edge
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Not confirmed beyond Landinfra Energy AB as developer/owner
research_value: Not confirmed beyond Landinfra Energy AB as developer/owner
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Landinfra Energy press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.landinfra-energy.com/landinfra-fortsatter-satsning-pa-havsbaserad-vindkraft-inleder-samradsprocessen-for-ytterligare-tre-projekt-i-sverige/

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on: 14/04/2026 portfolio page plus 17/10/2024 project press release. I found no authoritative project-specific transfer, JV, or percentage disclosure for Baltic Edge itself. A broader corporate partnership announcement with Eiffel concerns up to 1,800 MW of Swedish renewables, but it does not explicitly tie Baltic Edge to a defined equity share, so it is not used as project ownership confirmation.


wind_farm_id: 6320
canonical_id: 35e5ad94-9fb2-4bf5-aac1-cdf28f721ab0
wind_farm_name: Baltic Edge
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Concept
resolved_value: Concept
research_value: Concept
resolved_fact_id: 43092.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Landinfra Energy press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Landinfra says on 17/10/2024 it is initiating the consultation process and that the formal permit process begins as part of that consultation. That indicates very early development, but I did not find a filed permit application or consent decision for Baltic Edge itself. Closest Boundary Layer label: Concept rather than In Planning / Consent Application Submitted.


wind_farm_id: 6320
canonical_id: 35e5ad94-9fb2-4bf5-aac1-cdf28f721ab0
wind_farm_name: Baltic Edge
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1000 MW
resolved_value: 1000 MW
research_value: 1000 MW
resolved_fact_id: 43093.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.gem.wiki/Baltic_Edge_Floating_Offshore_wind_farm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Global Energy Monitor
source_of_record_url: https://www.gem.wiki/Baltic_Edge_Floating_Offshore_wind_farm
source_of_record_licence: site terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Multiple web sources support a planned capacity of 1,000 MW for Baltic Edge. This aligns with the database validation context.


wind_farm_id: 6320
canonical_id: 35e5ad94-9fb2-4bf5-aac1-cdf28f721ab0
wind_farm_name: Baltic Edge
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Landinfra Energy press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I found no project-specific official or regulatory source stating an export capacity / MEC distinct from gross planned capacity.


wind_farm_id: 6320
canonical_id: 35e5ad94-9fb2-4bf5-aac1-cdf28f721ab0
wind_farm_name: Baltic Edge
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.landinfra-energy.com/en/projects/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Landinfra projects page
source_of_record_url: https://www.landinfra-energy.com/en/projects/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided, so dataset fallback could not be used. Current web sources reviewed do not confirm a project-specific turbine model.


wind_farm_id: 6320
canonical_id: 35e5ad94-9fb2-4bf5-aac1-cdf28f721ab0
wind_farm_name: Baltic Edge
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.landinfra-energy.com/en/projects/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Landinfra projects page
source_of_record_url: https://www.landinfra-energy.com/en/projects/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided, so dataset fallback could not be used. No project-specific OEM confirmation found.


wind_farm_id: 6320
canonical_id: 35e5ad94-9fb2-4bf5-aac1-cdf28f721ab0
wind_farm_name: Baltic Edge
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.landinfra-energy.com/en/projects/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Landinfra projects page
source_of_record_url: https://www.landinfra-energy.com/en/projects/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided, so dataset fallback could not be used. No project-specific turbine rating found.


wind_farm_id: 6320
canonical_id: 35e5ad94-9fb2-4bf5-aac1-cdf28f721ab0
wind_farm_name: Baltic Edge
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.landinfra-energy.com/en/projects/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Landinfra projects page
source_of_record_url: https://www.landinfra-energy.com/en/projects/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided, so dataset fallback could not be used. No project-specific rotor diameter found.


wind_farm_id: 6320
canonical_id: 35e5ad94-9fb2-4bf5-aac1-cdf28f721ab0
wind_farm_name: Baltic Edge
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.landinfra-energy.com/en/projects/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Landinfra projects page
source_of_record_url: https://www.landinfra-energy.com/en/projects/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided, so dataset fallback could not be used. No project-specific hub height found, and it must not be inferred from generic turbine platforms.


wind_farm_id: 6320
canonical_id: 35e5ad94-9fb2-4bf5-aac1-cdf28f721ab0
wind_farm_name: Baltic Edge
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 8463.0
resolved_source_type: emodnet
resolved_source_name: EMODnet Human Activities
resolved_source_detail: EMODnet Jan 2026
citation_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMODnet Human Activities
source_of_record_type: public data portal
source_of_record_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
source_of_record_licence: Free and open public portal
research_source_name: Landinfra projects page
research_source_type: developer website
research_source_url: https://www.landinfra-energy.com/en/projects/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided, so dataset fallback could not be used. I found no authoritative project-specific turbine count. The web evidence therefore does not confirm the database hint of 0 turbines; that EMODnet value is most likely a placeholder for a concept-stage project rather than a real planned count.


wind_farm_id: 6320
canonical_id: 35e5ad94-9fb2-4bf5-aac1-cdf28f721ab0
wind_farm_name: Baltic Edge
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Landinfra Energy press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Although some secondary sources describe Baltic Edge as floating, I did not find a project-specific official source confirming foundation type, so it remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6320
canonical_id: 35e5ad94-9fb2-4bf5-aac1-cdf28f721ab0
wind_farm_name: Baltic Edge
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Landinfra Energy press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No consent decision located for Baltic Edge. Landinfra’s 17/10/2024 statement indicates the project is only entering consultation/formal permit process preparation.


wind_farm_id: 6340
canonical_id: ad6dc434-9530-42a6-b4b3-3fa0e2742982
wind_farm_name: Blekinge Offshore
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Blekinge Offshore
research_value: Blekinge Offshore
citation_url: https://www.eolus.com/en/projects/blekinge-offshore/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eolus project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.eolus.com/en/projects/blekinge-offshore/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Eolus’ current project page uses the official name Blekinge Offshore for the reworked Hanö Bay project off Sölvesborg/Karlshamn. The same name is also used in Eolus’ 2024 permit-application announcement, confirming identity continuity despite the project having been redesigned after the earlier 2016 rejection.


wind_farm_id: 6340
canonical_id: ad6dc434-9530-42a6-b4b3-3fa0e2742982
wind_farm_name: Blekinge Offshore
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 43127.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.eolus.com/en/projects/blekinge-offshore/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eolus project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.eolus.com/en/projects/blekinge-offshore/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Blekinge Offshore AB / Eolus-led consortium. Current owner(s): Eolus is majority owner; full current ownership split Not confirmed. Operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: Blekinge Offshore AB / Eolus-led consortium. Current owner(s): Eolus is majority owner; full current ownership split Not confirmed. Operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
Freshest ownership evidence is Eolus’ live project page, which says Per Witalisson is CEO of Eolus, the majority owner of the project company; the page was updated with March 2025 withdrawal information and January 2026 status wording. Older official sources show the consortium included Eolus, Vingkraft and VindIn, with VindIn at 10% in 2010 and Eolus at 56% in 2016–2019, but I did not find a newer official page reconciling the full present-day cap table to 100%, so percentages are kept Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6340
canonical_id: ad6dc434-9530-42a6-b4b3-3fa0e2742982
wind_farm_name: Blekinge Offshore
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eolus press release on VindIn stake
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
05/12/2010: Eolus and Vingkraft were project developers; VindIn agreed to acquire 10%. 20/12/2016 to at least 2019: Eolus reported 56% ownership. 2025/2026: Eolus confirms it is majority owner; remaining split Not confirmed

research_value:
05/12/2010: Eolus and Vingkraft were project developers; VindIn agreed to acquire 10%. 20/12/2016 to at least 2019: Eolus reported 56% ownership. 2025/2026: Eolus confirms it is majority owner; remaining split Not confirmed

citation_url:
https://www.eolus.com/blog/mfn_news/eolus-vind-ab-pressmeddelande-vindin-ab-forvarvar-10-procent-av-blekinge-offshore-ab/

research_summary:
Ownership history is partly documented in older official Eolus sources: the 2010 press release states VindIn would buy 10% from Eolus/Vingkraft; the 2015/2016 annual report and 2016 Eolus release state Eolus owns 56%. The freshest source date relied on for current ownership status is the Eolus project page reflecting March 2025 withdrawal and January 2026 “paused” wording, but it does not disclose the full current split.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.eolus.com/blog/mfn_news/eolus-vind-ab-pressmeddelande-vindin-ab-forvarvar-10-procent-av-blekinge-offshore-ab/


wind_farm_id: 6340
canonical_id: ad6dc434-9530-42a6-b4b3-3fa0e2742982
wind_farm_name: Blekinge Offshore
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Concept
resolved_value: Concept
research_value: Concept
resolved_fact_id: 43128.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.eolus.com/en/projects/blekinge-offshore/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eolus project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.eolus.com/en/projects/blekinge-offshore/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The live Eolus page says the project is in Planning, that development is paused, and that the permit application was withdrawn in March 2025. Because the latest application was withdrawn and Eolus says it will revisit the project when conditions change, the closest Boundary Layer label is Concept rather than “In Planning / Consent Application Submitted”.


wind_farm_id: 6340
canonical_id: ad6dc434-9530-42a6-b4b3-3fa0e2742982
wind_farm_name: Blekinge Offshore
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1000 MW
resolved_value: 1000 MW
research_value: 1000 MW
resolved_fact_id: 43129.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.eolus.com/en/projects/blekinge-offshore/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eolus project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.eolus.com/en/projects/blekinge-offshore/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Eolus’ current English project page says the redesigned project had the potential for approximately 1,000 MW installed capacity. Eolus’ Q1 2024 interim report separately describes Blekinge Offshore as a 1,000 MW project when the permit application was submitted.


wind_farm_id: 6340
canonical_id: ad6dc434-9530-42a6-b4b3-3fa0e2742982
wind_farm_name: Blekinge Offshore
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eolus.com/en/projects/blekinge-offshore/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eolus project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.eolus.com/en/projects/blekinge-offshore/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I found no openly accessible project-specific source explicitly stating a grid export limit or MEC in MW for the current redesigned project. Available official pages discuss planned installed capacity and annual production, but not a separate export-capacity figure.


wind_farm_id: 6340
canonical_id: ad6dc434-9530-42a6-b4b3-3fa0e2742982
wind_farm_name: Blekinge Offshore
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eolus.com/en/projects/blekinge-offshore/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eolus project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.eolus.com/en/projects/blekinge-offshore/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided in the project context. Current project-specific web sources confirm only broad layout parameters such as max 70 turbines and max height 330 m; they do not identify a turbine model.


wind_farm_id: 6340
canonical_id: ad6dc434-9530-42a6-b4b3-3fa0e2742982
wind_farm_name: Blekinge Offshore
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eolus.com/en/projects/blekinge-offshore/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eolus project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.eolus.com/en/projects/blekinge-offshore/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided in the project context. I found no project-specific official or supplier source naming an OEM for the current scheme.


wind_farm_id: 6340
canonical_id: ad6dc434-9530-42a6-b4b3-3fa0e2742982
wind_farm_name: Blekinge Offshore
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eolus.com/en/projects/blekinge-offshore/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eolus project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.eolus.com/en/projects/blekinge-offshore/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided in the project context. Official project pages do not state per-turbine MW for the redesigned project, so no value is inferred.


wind_farm_id: 6340
canonical_id: ad6dc434-9530-42a6-b4b3-3fa0e2742982
wind_farm_name: Blekinge Offshore
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eolus.com/en/projects/blekinge-offshore/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eolus project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.eolus.com/en/projects/blekinge-offshore/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided in the project context. Current project sources do not specify rotor diameter for Blekinge Offshore.


wind_farm_id: 6340
canonical_id: ad6dc434-9530-42a6-b4b3-3fa0e2742982
wind_farm_name: Blekinge Offshore
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eolus.com/en/projects/blekinge-offshore/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eolus project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.eolus.com/en/projects/blekinge-offshore/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided in the project context. No project-specific source found states hub height; max total height alone is not enough to derive hub height.


wind_farm_id: 6340
canonical_id: ad6dc434-9530-42a6-b4b3-3fa0e2742982
wind_farm_name: Blekinge Offshore
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: max 70
resolved_value: max 70
research_value: max 70
resolved_fact_id: 43130.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.eolus.com/en/projects/blekinge-offshore/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eolus project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.eolus.com/en/projects/blekinge-offshore/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Eolus’ current project page and the 2024 application announcement both state the redesigned project comprises up to / max 70 wind turbines. This differs from the database validation hint of 0 and likely reflects that EMODnet’s fallback row is a concept-stage boundary record rather than current project-page content.


wind_farm_id: 6340
canonical_id: ad6dc434-9530-42a6-b4b3-3fa0e2742982
wind_farm_name: Blekinge Offshore
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eolus.com/en/projects/blekinge-offshore/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eolus project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.eolus.com/en/projects/blekinge-offshore/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I found no project-specific official or regulator source confirming foundation type for the current redesigned project.


wind_farm_id: 6340
canonical_id: ad6dc434-9530-42a6-b4b3-3fa0e2742982
wind_farm_name: Blekinge Offshore
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eolus.com/en/projects/blekinge-offshore/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eolus project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.eolus.com/en/projects/blekinge-offshore/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The current project did not reach consent. The latest application was submitted in 2024 and withdrawn on 05/03/2025. The earlier 2016 government decision was a rejection of a previous project design, not a consent grant.


wind_farm_id: 6340
canonical_id: ad6dc434-9530-42a6-b4b3-3fa0e2742982
wind_farm_name: Blekinge Offshore
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eolus.com/en/projects/blekinge-offshore/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eolus project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.eolus.com/en/projects/blekinge-offshore/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No source found indicating FID for Blekinge Offshore. Given the project remains paused and the application was withdrawn, FID has not been confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6342
canonical_id: c17b4b6d-a6f9-496a-ba1d-45cfce217f1f
wind_farm_name: Nordsren II vest
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Nordsren II vest
research_value: Nordsren II vest
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Outer Dowsing HRA report, Mar 2025
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010130-002019-7.1%20Report%20to%20Inform%20Appropriate%20Assessment%20Tracked.pdf

research_summary:
The name “Nordsren II vest” appears in multiple recent offshore cumulative-effects documents as a distinct project entry. No official project website or developer page openly confirming a fuller formal name was found, so the working identity remains the cited project name only.

source_of_record_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010130-002019-7.1%20Report%20to%20Inform%20Appropriate%20Assessment%20Tracked.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6342
canonical_id: c17b4b6d-a6f9-496a-ba1d-45cfce217f1f
wind_farm_name: Nordsren II vest
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Outer Dowsing HRA report, Mar 2025
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010130-002019-7.1%20Report%20to%20Inform%20Appropriate%20Assessment%20Tracked.pdf

research_summary:
No authoritative open source located an identified developer, owner, operator, or JV structure for Nordsren II vest. The freshest usable sources located only list the project name and a very early status, without ownership detail. Freshest source date relied on here: March 2025.


wind_farm_id: 6342
canonical_id: c17b4b6d-a6f9-496a-ba1d-45cfce217f1f
wind_farm_name: Nordsren II vest
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Outer Dowsing HRA report, Mar 2025
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No open authoritative web source was found showing historic or current transfers, equity partners, or ownership percentages. Freshest source date relied on here: March 2025; those sources still do not identify an owner.


wind_farm_id: 6342
canonical_id: c17b4b6d-a6f9-496a-ba1d-45cfce217f1f
wind_farm_name: Nordsren II vest
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Concept
resolved_value: Concept
research_value: Concept
resolved_fact_id: 40534.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Outer Dowsing HRA report, Mar 2025
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Two recent independent planning documents list Nordsren II vest as “Concept/Early Planning.” That maps most closely to the required Boundary Layer label Concept.


wind_farm_id: 6342
canonical_id: c17b4b6d-a6f9-496a-ba1d-45cfce217f1f
wind_farm_name: Nordsren II vest
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 7350.0
resolved_source_type: emodnet
resolved_source_name: EMODnet Human Activities
resolved_source_detail: EMODnet Jan 2026
citation_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMODnet Human Activities
source_of_record_type: public data portal
source_of_record_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
source_of_record_licence: Free and open public portal
research_source_name: Outer Dowsing HRA report, Mar 2025
research_source_type: planning document
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
No authoritative project-specific source confirming planned installed capacity in MW was found. Third-party cumulative-effects tables include coordinates/status references but do not provide a reliable project capacity value attributable to an official source.


wind_farm_id: 6342
canonical_id: c17b4b6d-a6f9-496a-ba1d-45cfce217f1f
wind_farm_name: Nordsren II vest
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Outer Dowsing HRA report, Mar 2025
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No authoritative open source located a grid connection application, permit, or project filing stating MEC/export capacity for Nordsren II vest.


wind_farm_id: 6342
canonical_id: c17b4b6d-a6f9-496a-ba1d-45cfce217f1f
wind_farm_name: Nordsren II vest
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ossian-eia.com/riaa/part-two/part-19.html
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ossian RIAA
source_of_record_url: https://ossian-eia.com/riaa/part-two/part-19.html
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine row was provided in the task context, and no project-specific web source confirming a turbine model was found. Per instruction, this is left as Not confirmed rather than inferred.


wind_farm_id: 6342
canonical_id: c17b4b6d-a6f9-496a-ba1d-45cfce217f1f
wind_farm_name: Nordsren II vest
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ossian-eia.com/riaa/part-two/part-19.html
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ossian RIAA
source_of_record_url: https://ossian-eia.com/riaa/part-two/part-19.html
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine row was provided and no project-specific OEM information was found in open sources.


wind_farm_id: 6342
canonical_id: c17b4b6d-a6f9-496a-ba1d-45cfce217f1f
wind_farm_name: Nordsren II vest
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ossian-eia.com/riaa/part-two/part-19.html
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ossian RIAA
source_of_record_url: https://ossian-eia.com/riaa/part-two/part-19.html
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific turbine rating was found, and no dataset fallback was available in the supplied context.


wind_farm_id: 6342
canonical_id: c17b4b6d-a6f9-496a-ba1d-45cfce217f1f
wind_farm_name: Nordsren II vest
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ossian-eia.com/riaa/part-two/part-19.html
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ossian RIAA
source_of_record_url: https://ossian-eia.com/riaa/part-two/part-19.html
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific rotor diameter was found, and no linked EuroWindWakes fallback exists in the provided context.


wind_farm_id: 6342
canonical_id: c17b4b6d-a6f9-496a-ba1d-45cfce217f1f
wind_farm_name: Nordsren II vest
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ossian-eia.com/riaa/part-two/part-19.html
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ossian RIAA
source_of_record_url: https://ossian-eia.com/riaa/part-two/part-19.html
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific hub height was found, and no linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was supplied for fallback.


wind_farm_id: 6342
canonical_id: c17b4b6d-a6f9-496a-ba1d-45cfce217f1f
wind_farm_name: Nordsren II vest
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: 0
resolved_fact_id: 40535.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Outer Dowsing HRA report, Mar 2025
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No web source was found confirming any installed or consented turbines for this concept-stage project. That aligns with the database validation signal of 0 from EMODnet; likely reason is that the entry represents an undeveloped concept/area rather than a consented scheme with defined turbine numbers.


wind_farm_id: 6342
canonical_id: c17b4b6d-a6f9-496a-ba1d-45cfce217f1f
wind_farm_name: Nordsren II vest
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ossian-eia.com/riaa/part-two/part-0.html
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ossian RIAA overview
source_of_record_url: https://ossian-eia.com/riaa/part-two/part-0.html
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific foundation concept was found. One recent assessment explicitly notes limited/no information on construction/operation dates and foundation types for some projects in this group, supporting a Not confirmed outcome.


wind_farm_id: 6342
canonical_id: c17b4b6d-a6f9-496a-ba1d-45cfce217f1f
wind_farm_name: Nordsren II vest
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Outer Dowsing HRA report, Mar 2025
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No planning consent date was found. Available recent sources still classify Nordsren II vest as concept/early planning, implying no confirmed consent milestone.


wind_farm_id: 6343
canonical_id: c15d8c21-8665-42f1-829e-c1ed68fb7721
wind_farm_name: Vesterhav Syd
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Vesterhav Syd
research_value: Vesterhav Syd
citation_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/vesterhav-syd/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall asset page
source_of_record_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/vesterhav-syd/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official project name is Vesterhav Syd. It is frequently presented together with its sister project Vesterhav Nord as the “Vesterhav” nearshore pair, so phase/name ambiguity was resolved by using project-specific Vesterhav Syd sources.


wind_farm_id: 6343
canonical_id: c15d8c21-8665-42f1-829e-c1ed68fb7721
wind_farm_name: Vesterhav Syd
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 40536.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/vesterhav-syd/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall asset page
source_of_record_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/vesterhav-syd/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Vattenfall; Current owner(s): Vattenfall 92% and local co-owners up to 8%; Operator: Vattenfall

resolved_value:
Developer: Vattenfall; Current owner(s): Vattenfall 92% and local co-owners up to 8%; Operator: Vattenfall

research_summary:
Freshest ownership source is Vattenfall’s live asset page, which states “Vattenfall ownership share 92%”. Vattenfall’s local co-ownership page explains Vesterhav Syd was opened to local ownership up to 20%, but the 2023 share-sale result for Vesterhav Syd shows only about 73,000 of c.156,000 offered shares were requested, implying c.8% ultimately sold and consistent with Vattenfall retaining 92%. Operator is treated as Vattenfall based on its owner/asset-operation pages.


wind_farm_id: 6343
canonical_id: c15d8c21-8665-42f1-829e-c1ed68fb7721
wind_farm_name: Vesterhav Syd
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency project page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
22/12/2016 concession awarded to Vattenfall Vindkraft Vesterhav Syd P/S; local share offer launched 11/05/2023; post-sale ownership appears to have settled at Vattenfall 92% plus minority local co-owners

research_value:
22/12/2016 concession awarded to Vattenfall Vindkraft Vesterhav Syd P/S; local share offer launched 11/05/2023; post-sale ownership appears to have settled at Vattenfall 92% plus minority local co-owners

citation_url:
https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/ongoing-offshore-wind-tenders/vesterhav-syd-and-vesterhav-nord-offshore-wind-farms

research_summary:
Repaired to use live source-of-record pages instead of the dead legacy PDF URL. The Danish Energy Agency’s Vesterhav Syd/Nord project page states the concession agreements were signed 22th of December 2016. Vattenfall’s 11 May 2023 share-offer launch confirms the local ownership step, and Vattenfall’s live asset page shows 92% current Vattenfall ownership. No evidence found of a later institutional equity transfer.

source_of_record_url:
https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/ongoing-offshore-wind-tenders/vesterhav-syd-and-vesterhav-nord-offshore-wind-farms


wind_farm_id: 6343
canonical_id: c15d8c21-8665-42f1-829e-c1ed68fb7721
wind_farm_name: Vesterhav Syd
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 40537.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/vesterhav-syd/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall asset page
source_of_record_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/vesterhav-syd/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Vattenfall states the project “has been in operation since 2024” and the January 2024 grid-connection announcement says the whole wind farm was completely connected to the Danish grid. This aligns with the database validation context of Operational.


wind_farm_id: 6343
canonical_id: c15d8c21-8665-42f1-829e-c1ed68fb7721
wind_farm_name: Vesterhav Syd
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 168 MW
resolved_value: 168 MW
research_value: 168 MW
resolved_fact_id: 40538.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/vesterhav-syd/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall asset page
source_of_record_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/vesterhav-syd/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current operational capacity is consistently stated by Vattenfall as 168 MW for Vesterhav Syd. Older tender/concession documents used 170 MW for the concessioned plant with allowed adjustment, so 168 MW is the as-built installed capacity.


wind_farm_id: 6343
canonical_id: c15d8c21-8665-42f1-829e-c1ed68fb7721
wind_farm_name: Vesterhav Syd
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 170 MW
resolved_value: 170 MW
research_value: 170 MW
resolved_fact_id: 40539.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency established offshore wind farms page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Repaired to use an accessible regulator source. The Danish Energy Agency’s established-offshore-wind-farms page lists “Vesterhav Syd (2023) 20 møller, 170 MW”. That aligns with the tender/concession-era project page showing Vesterhav Syd as the 170 MW component of the nearshore scheme, while recent owner pages show 168 MW as built installed capacity.


wind_farm_id: 6343
canonical_id: c15d8c21-8665-42f1-829e-c1ed68fb7721
wind_farm_name: Vesterhav Syd
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: SG 8.0-167 DD
resolved_value: SG 8.0-167 DD
research_value: SG 8.0-167 DD
resolved_fact_id: 40540.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Siemens Gamesa’s project-specific 2021 order release explicitly ties 20 SG 8.0-167 DD turbines to Vesterhav Syd. A later project-specific Danish noise report instead refers to SG-8.4-167-DD with 109 m hub height; because model evidence is conflicting, the chosen value follows the stronger project-tied OEM order release and the required linked EuroWindWakes fallback, which also gives SG 8.0-167 DD.


wind_farm_id: 6343
canonical_id: c15d8c21-8665-42f1-829e-c1ed68fb7721
wind_farm_name: Vesterhav Syd
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 8
resolved_value: 8
research_value: 8 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9322.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Siemens Gamesa’s project-specific release ties Vesterhav Syd to SG 8.0-167 DD turbines, implying 8 MW each. Because a later project-specific noise report uses SG-8.4-167-DD, web evidence is not fully consistent; per the required fallback rule, the linked EuroWindWakes value 8 MW is used.


wind_farm_id: 6343
canonical_id: c15d8c21-8665-42f1-829e-c1ed68fb7721
wind_farm_name: Vesterhav Syd
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 167
resolved_value: 167
research_value: 167 m
resolved_fact_id: 9477.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web evidence and EuroWindWakes are aligned at 167 m. Siemens Gamesa’s Vesterhav order release explicitly names the SG 8.0-167 DD platform; the later project-specific noise report also uses the 167 variant.


wind_farm_id: 6343
canonical_id: c15d8c21-8665-42f1-829e-c1ed68fb7721
wind_farm_name: Vesterhav Syd
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 109
resolved_value: 109
research_value: 109 m
resolved_fact_id: 9632.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Harder-to-source field. A project-specific Danish noise report explicitly states “109 m hub height” for Vesterhav Syd. This also matches the linked EuroWindWakes fallback value, so the field is treated as confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6343
canonical_id: c15d8c21-8665-42f1-829e-c1ed68fb7721
wind_farm_name: Vesterhav Syd
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 20
resolved_value: 20
research_value: 20
resolved_fact_id: 48480.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 20 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Vattenfall asset page
research_source_type: owner/operator webpage
research_source_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/vesterhav-syd/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Vattenfall’s asset page states 20 turbines, and project-specific Danish technical/noise documents also state 20 wind turbines. This aligns with all non-web validation signals provided: EMODnet hint 20 and EuroWindWakes calculated linked-turbine count 20.


wind_farm_id: 6343
canonical_id: c15d8c21-8665-42f1-829e-c1ed68fb7721
wind_farm_name: Vesterhav Syd
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile
resolved_value: Monopile
research_value: Monopile
resolved_fact_id: 40546.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/3136/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vesterhav Syd underwater-noise modelling document
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/3136/download
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific Vattenfall construction updates and Danish technical documents explicitly state Vesterhav Syd uses monopiles / monopile foundations.


wind_farm_id: 6343
canonical_id: c15d8c21-8665-42f1-829e-c1ed68fb7721
wind_farm_name: Vesterhav Syd
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 14/12/2020
resolved_value: 14/12/2020
research_value: 14/12/2020
resolved_fact_id: 40547.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/presse/vattenfall-faar-tilladelse-til-etablere-vesterhav-syd-og-vesterhav-nord
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/presse/vattenfall-faar-tilladelse-til-etablere-vesterhav-syd-og-vesterhav-nord
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
For the built offshore works, the decisive construction consent / establishment permission used for this profile is 14 December 2020, when the Danish Energy Agency granted permission to start construction following the renewed EIA process.


wind_farm_id: 6343
canonical_id: c15d8c21-8665-42f1-829e-c1ed68fb7721
wind_farm_name: Vesterhav Syd
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 14/12/2021
resolved_value: 14/12/2021
research_value: 14/12/2021
resolved_fact_id: 40548.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall FID release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/press-and-media/pressreleases/2021/vattenfall-gives-go-ahead-for-vesterhav-syd-and-nord-offshore-wind-farms

research_summary:
Vattenfall’s dated 2021 release explicitly says it “has taken the final investment decision” for Vesterhav Syd and Nord on 14 December 2021.

source_of_record_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/press-and-media/pressreleases/2021/vattenfall-gives-go-ahead-for-vesterhav-syd-and-nord-offshore-wind-farms


wind_farm_id: 6343
canonical_id: c15d8c21-8665-42f1-829e-c1ed68fb7721
wind_farm_name: Vesterhav Syd
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 14/11/2023
resolved_value: 14/11/2023
research_value: 14/11/2023
resolved_fact_id: 40549.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
research_summary: Vattenfall published that Vesterhav Syd “has supplied its first power” on 14 November 2023.
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall first-power release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/press-and-media/newsroom/2023/vattenfall-supplies-first-power-from-denmarks-next-offshore-wind-farm

source_of_record_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/press-and-media/newsroom/2023/vattenfall-supplies-first-power-from-denmarks-next-offshore-wind-farm


wind_farm_id: 6343
canonical_id: c15d8c21-8665-42f1-829e-c1ed68fb7721
wind_farm_name: Vesterhav Syd
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2024-03-01
resolved_value: 2024-03-01
research_value: 09/01/2024
resolved_fact_id: 9787.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Vattenfall grid-connection news
research_source_type: owner/developer news release
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Vattenfall announced on 9 January 2024 that every turbine had supplied first power and the wind farm was completely connected to the Danish power grid; this is the clearest commissioning milestone for full operation. The linked EuroWindWakes commissioning month of March 2024 appears later than the company commissioning announcement, so January 2024 is more likely the operational completion date.

research_source_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/press-and-media/newsroom/2024/vattenfall-connects-danish-offshore-wind-farm-to-the-grid/


wind_farm_id: 6344
canonical_id: ed111641-82de-4db2-b9e7-ddf14d2d4853
wind_farm_name: Bockstigen 1
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Momentum Energy Group case page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Bockstigen offshore wind farm; alternative / historic name not separately confirmed for “Bockstigen 1”

research_value:
Bockstigen offshore wind farm; alternative / historic name not separately confirmed for “Bockstigen 1”

citation_url:
https://momentumgreenenergy.com/en/case/lifetime-extension-of-bockstigen-offshore-wind-farm-on-gotland/

research_summary:
Web sources support the built offshore wind farm as Bockstigen on Gotland, Sweden, first built in 1998. I found no authoritative web source using a distinct official phase label “Bockstigen 1”, so this appears to be a database naming variant rather than a separately evidenced phase.

source_of_record_url:
https://momentumgreenenergy.com/en/case/lifetime-extension-of-bockstigen-offshore-wind-farm-on-gotland/


wind_farm_id: 6344
canonical_id: ed111641-82de-4db2-b9e7-ddf14d2d4853
wind_farm_name: Bockstigen 1
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 43139.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Momentum Energy Group case page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Vattenfall. Current owner(s): Not confirmed. Operator / asset manager: Momentum Sverige AB / Momentum Energy Group appears current, but full current ownership not fully reconciled.

resolved_value:
Developer: Vattenfall. Current owner(s): Not confirmed. Operator / asset manager: Momentum Sverige AB / Momentum Energy Group appears current, but full current ownership not fully reconciled.

citation_url:
https://momentumgreenenergy.com/en/case/lifetime-extension-of-bockstigen-offshore-wind-farm-on-gotland/

research_summary:
Older and project-history sources show Vattenfall developed the project. Momentum states it executed the 2018 life-extension and says the wind farm was sold to a Danish investor in December 2019; Momentum also describes Bockstigen in 2024 as “our offshore wind farm,” which supports an operating role but does not cleanly reconcile full current legal ownership. Freshest source relied on: Momentum post published around summer 2024.


wind_farm_id: 6344
canonical_id: ed111641-82de-4db2-b9e7-ddf14d2d4853
wind_farm_name: Bockstigen 1
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Momentum Energy Group case page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Vattenfall developer / historical owner; Momentum involved in life extension and repowering before sale; sold to a Danish investor in 12/2019; current equity split Not confirmed

research_value:
Vattenfall developer / historical owner; Momentum involved in life extension and repowering before sale; sold to a Danish investor in 12/2019; current equity split Not confirmed

research_summary:
Ownership history is clearer than current ownership. Momentum says the repowering was financed by banks and owners’ equity and that the wind farm was sold to a Danish investor in December 2019. I did not find an openly accessible authoritative source naming that investor or giving current percentages, so ownership split remains Not confirmed. Freshest source relied on: Momentum 2024 website content referencing the asset.


wind_farm_id: 6344
canonical_id: ed111641-82de-4db2-b9e7-ddf14d2d4853
wind_farm_name: Bockstigen 1
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 43140.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Momentum Energy Group case page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Multiple web sources indicate the wind farm remains in operation after the 2018 life extension / partial repowering. Momentum says all five turbines have been back in full operation since November 2018 and its 2024 update describes maintenance works on the offshore wind farm, supporting Operational status rather than decommissioned.


wind_farm_id: 6344
canonical_id: ed111641-82de-4db2-b9e7-ddf14d2d4853
wind_farm_name: Bockstigen 1
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2.75 MW
resolved_value: 2.75 MW
research_value: 2.75 MW
resolved_fact_id: 43141.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Momentum Energy Group case page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Web evidence supports five 550 kW turbines, implying 2.75 MW total installed capacity for the original project. This aligns with the database turbine-count hint but shows the EMODnet capacity value 2750 MW is clearly a unit/decimal error.


wind_farm_id: 6344
canonical_id: ed111641-82de-4db2-b9e7-ddf14d2d4853
wind_farm_name: Bockstigen 1
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Tethys-hosted Bockstigen study PDF
source_of_record_licence: public PDF access
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://tethys.pnnl.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Park-optimization-and-wake-interaction-study-at-Bockstigen-offshore-wind-power-plant.pdf

research_summary:
I found no project-specific authoritative web source stating an export capacity / MEC distinct from installed capacity. Older technical material discusses grid restrictions and operation, but not a clearly labeled MEC value.

source_of_record_url:
https://tethys.pnnl.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Park-optimization-and-wake-interaction-study-at-Bockstigen-offshore-wind-power-plant.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6344
canonical_id: ed111641-82de-4db2-b9e7-ddf14d2d4853
wind_farm_name: Bockstigen 1
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Wind World 550 kW
resolved_value: Wind World 550 kW
research_value: Wind World 550 kW
resolved_fact_id: 43142.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Momentum Energy Group case page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific sources tie the original Bockstigen project to five Wind World 550 kW turbines. After the 2018 life extension, Momentum says nacelles/rotors/transformers were replaced with refurbished Vestas V47 nacelles and related components, but the project page still describes the asset as consisting of five Wind World 550 kW turbines; I therefore retain the as-built project model as the clearest confirmed value and note the partial repowering nuance.


wind_farm_id: 6344
canonical_id: ed111641-82de-4db2-b9e7-ddf14d2d4853
wind_farm_name: Bockstigen 1
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Wind World
resolved_value: Wind World
research_value: Wind World
resolved_fact_id: 43143.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Momentum Energy Group case page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Momentum explicitly states Wind World 550 kW wind turbines. This is project-specific evidence for the original OEM.


wind_farm_id: 6344
canonical_id: ed111641-82de-4db2-b9e7-ddf14d2d4853
wind_farm_name: Bockstigen 1
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 550 kW
resolved_value: 550 kW
research_value: 550 kW
resolved_fact_id: 43144.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Momentum Energy Group case page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Both project-specific and technical-history sources support 550 kW per turbine for the original project.


wind_farm_id: 6344
canonical_id: ed111641-82de-4db2-b9e7-ddf14d2d4853
wind_farm_name: Bockstigen 1
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Momentum Energy Group case page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No authoritative project-specific web source found that explicitly states the rotor diameter for this exact project/phase. Per the rules, I did not infer rotor diameter from a generic Wind World or Vestas turbine brochure.


wind_farm_id: 6344
canonical_id: ed111641-82de-4db2-b9e7-ddf14d2d4853
wind_farm_name: Bockstigen 1
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DTU Orbit publication record
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/offshore-wind-farm-bockstigen-installation-and-operation-experien

research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided, and I found no project-specific authoritative web source explicitly stating Bockstigen’s hub height. Per the no-inference rule, hub height remains Not confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/offshore-wind-farm-bockstigen-installation-and-operation-experien


wind_farm_id: 6344
canonical_id: ed111641-82de-4db2-b9e7-ddf14d2d4853
wind_farm_name: Bockstigen 1
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 5
resolved_value: 5
research_value: 5
resolved_fact_id: 43145.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Momentum Energy Group case page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Web sources consistently support 5 turbines. This aligns with the non-web validation signals from EMODnet / database context. The web-sourced figure therefore matches the current database winner candidate of 5.


wind_farm_id: 6344
canonical_id: ed111641-82de-4db2-b9e7-ddf14d2d4853
wind_farm_name: Bockstigen 1
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile
resolved_value: Monopile
research_value: Monopile
resolved_fact_id: 43146.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.deutsche-leuchtfeuer.de/schwedische-leuchtfeuer/gotland/bockstigen.html
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: deutsche-leuchtfeuer Bockstigen page
source_of_record_url: https://www.deutsche-leuchtfeuer.de/schwedische-leuchtfeuer/gotland/bockstigen.html
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Technical sources specifically cite Bockstigen as using monopile foundations; one source also notes monopile foundation tubes of 2.10 m shaft diameter.


wind_farm_id: 6344
canonical_id: ed111641-82de-4db2-b9e7-ddf14d2d4853
wind_farm_name: Bockstigen 1
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DTU Orbit publication record
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/offshore-wind-farm-bockstigen-installation-and-operation-experien

research_summary:
I did not find an open authoritative source clearly stating a formal consent / permit date for the original 1990s project.


wind_farm_id: 6344
canonical_id: ed111641-82de-4db2-b9e7-ddf14d2d4853
wind_farm_name: Bockstigen 1
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/03/1998
resolved_value: 01/03/1998
research_value: 01/03/1998
resolved_fact_id: 43147.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Momentum Energy Group case page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Momentum’s accessible project case page states Bockstigen was built in 1998 and that the turbines have been generating electricity since their installation. Exact day is not confirmed, so the month-normalized date is retained.


wind_farm_id: 6357
canonical_id: 83e20506-4425-4a75-929f-a4fba827f768
wind_farm_name: Kriegers Flak II
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Kriegers Flak II Havvindmøllepark / Kriegers Flak II Offshore Wind Farm
research_value: Kriegers Flak II Havvindmøllepark / Kriegers Flak II Offshore Wind Farm
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency project page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Danish Energy Agency pages consistently use Kriegers Flak II Havvindmøllepark. The project is a future Danish tender area/project linked to the 2022 climate agreement and the 2024 offshore tender. Name ambiguity exists because “Kriegers Flak II” is also used for a Swedish project; this profile uses the Danish DEA project only.


wind_farm_id: 6357
canonical_id: 83e20506-4425-4a75-929f-a4fba827f768
wind_farm_name: Kriegers Flak II
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 40551.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://eu.eu-supply.com/ctm/Supplier/PublicPurchase/399416/1/0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EU-Supply public RFT
source_of_record_url: https://eu.eu-supply.com/ctm/Supplier/PublicPurchase/399416/1/0
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Not yet awarded; Current owner(s): Not confirmed; Equity partners and percentages: Not confirmed; Operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: Not yet awarded; Current owner(s): Not confirmed; Equity partners and percentages: Not confirmed; Operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
Freshest official evidence indicates this is still a state-run tendered project without a selected concessionaire. DEA’s 24/04/2024 tender launch says Kriegers Flak II is one of the tender sites, while EU-Supply says the future concessionaire must hold the project in co-ownership with a Danish State Holding company. No current private owner/operator is confirmed from accessible official sources. Freshest source date relied on: 29/04/2025 catalog update plus 24/04/2024 tender launch.


wind_farm_id: 6357
canonical_id: 83e20506-4425-4a75-929f-a4fba827f768
wind_farm_name: Kriegers Flak II
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: State-planned project; concessionaire not yet selected
research_value: State-planned project; concessionaire not yet selected
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency preliminary investigations page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/ongoing-offshore-wind-tenders/preliminary-investigations-ongoing-offshore-wind-farm

research_summary:
The project originates from Danish state planning and tendering rather than from a named commercial developer. The tender documents provide for later co-ownership with State Holding, but accessible current sources do not show an awarded concession or reconciled ownership split. Freshest source date relied on: 29/04/2025 DEA preliminary-investigations catalog update, which still treats the project as a tender-stage project.

source_of_record_url:
https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/ongoing-offshore-wind-tenders/preliminary-investigations-ongoing-offshore-wind-farm


wind_farm_id: 6357
canonical_id: 83e20506-4425-4a75-929f-a4fba827f768
wind_farm_name: Kriegers Flak II
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Concept
resolved_value: Concept
research_value: Consented
resolved_fact_id: 40641.0
resolved_source_type: community
resolved_source_name: Community approved
resolved_source_detail: approved community correction #12
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Community approved
research_source_name: DEA press release, 14/10/2024
research_source_type: government
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_and_community_differ
validation_basis: community
community_approved_note_count: 2
community_correction_count: 2
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 1
community_supports_resolved_value: 1
community_disputes_resolved_value: 1
research_summary:
Danish Energy Agency material says it was possible to adopt the plan for Kriegers Flak II, and the related 14/10/2024 press release says DEA adopts the plan for Kattegat and Kriegers Flak II. The project still has no selected concessionaire, and concessionaire-specific land EIA/permit steps are shown as “Paused - Until further notice” on the DEA investigations page. So the closest Boundary Layer status remains Consented rather than awarded/FID/pre-construction.

research_source_url:
https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-vedtager-plan-havvindmoelleparkerne-kattegat-og-kriegers-flak-ii


wind_farm_id: 6357
canonical_id: 83e20506-4425-4a75-929f-a4fba827f768
wind_farm_name: Kriegers Flak II
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Minimum 1,000 MW planned
resolved_value: Minimum 1,000 MW planned
research_value: Minimum 1,000 MW planned
resolved_fact_id: 40553.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/denmarks-largest-tendering-procedure-offshore-wind-power-launched
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency tender launch
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/denmarks-largest-tendering-procedure-offshore-wind-power-launched
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The official tender launch states “Minimum 1 GW in Kriegers Flak II.” DEA hearing material also shows the plan is assessed for minimum 1,000 MW with scenarios up to 3.45 GW. For the project profile, the clearest committed project capacity is therefore minimum 1,000 MW planned rather than the older 640 MW database fallback.


wind_farm_id: 6357
canonical_id: 83e20506-4425-4a75-929f-a4fba827f768
wind_farm_name: Kriegers Flak II
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1,000 MW
resolved_value: 1,000 MW
research_value: 1,000 MW
resolved_fact_id: 40554.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency preliminary investigations page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/ongoing-offshore-wind-tenders/preliminary-investigations-ongoing-offshore-wind-farm

research_summary:
Project-specific accessible sources indicate the tendered project is structured around 1 GW grid connection / concessionaire land project. DEA’s investigations catalog refers to the concessionaire’s “1 GW land-based project for Kriegers Flak II”, supporting 1,000 MW as the best-confirmed MEC-style export figure now available.


wind_farm_id: 6357
canonical_id: 83e20506-4425-4a75-929f-a4fba827f768
wind_farm_name: Kriegers Flak II
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/3454/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA public meeting slides
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/3454/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
DEA planning material explicitly says “Det endelige projekt kendes ikke på nuværende tidspunkt” / the final project is not yet known. No project-specific awarded turbine model was confirmed. Per instruction, turbine specifics are left Not confirmed rather than inferred from planning scenarios or other sites.


wind_farm_id: 6357
canonical_id: 83e20506-4425-4a75-929f-a4fba827f768
wind_farm_name: Kriegers Flak II
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency project page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No awarded concessionaire or supply contract has been identified in accessible official sources, and DEA planning documents do not specify an OEM for the actual project.


wind_farm_id: 6357
canonical_id: 83e20506-4425-4a75-929f-a4fba827f768
wind_farm_name: Kriegers Flak II
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/3454/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA public meeting slides
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/3454/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
DEA hearing slides use assessment scenarios of 15 MW and 27 MW turbines, but these are planning assumptions only and not confirmed as project selection. Therefore individual turbine rating remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6357
canonical_id: 83e20506-4425-4a75-929f-a4fba827f768
wind_farm_name: Kriegers Flak II
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency project page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific awarded turbine has been confirmed, so rotor diameter cannot be reliably assigned.


wind_farm_id: 6357
canonical_id: 83e20506-4425-4a75-929f-a4fba827f768
wind_farm_name: Kriegers Flak II
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency project page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific hub height is confirmed in accessible official sources, and the prompt forbids inferring hub height from generic turbine platforms or other projects.


wind_farm_id: 6357
canonical_id: 83e20506-4425-4a75-929f-a4fba827f768
wind_farm_name: Kriegers Flak II
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 128
resolved_value: 128
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 8500.0
resolved_source_type: emodnet
resolved_source_name: EMODnet Human Activities
resolved_source_detail: EMODnet Jan 2026
citation_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMODnet Human Activities
source_of_record_type: public data portal
source_of_record_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
source_of_record_licence: Free and open public portal
research_source_name: DEA public meeting slides
research_source_type: government PDF
research_source_url: https://ens.dk/media/3454/download
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Web sources reviewed do not confirm an awarded or fixed turbine count for the Danish project. DEA planning material instead models a range of possible turbine sizes for a not-yet-finalized project. This differs from the database validation signal of 128 turbines / 640 MW; that older figure is most likely from a different project concept or an outdated cross-border/phase interpretation, whereas current Danish official tender materials define the project as a minimum 1 GW tender with final design not yet known.


wind_farm_id: 6357
canonical_id: 83e20506-4425-4a75-929f-a4fba827f768
wind_farm_name: Kriegers Flak II
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency project page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific foundation type is confirmed in accessible official sources for the final Danish tendered project.


wind_farm_id: 6357
canonical_id: 83e20506-4425-4a75-929f-a4fba827f768
wind_farm_name: Kriegers Flak II
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 14/10/2024
resolved_value: 14/10/2024
research_value: 14/10/2024
resolved_fact_id: 40555.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA press release, 14/10/2024
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-vedtager-plan-havvindmoelleparkerne-kattegat-og-kriegers-flak-ii

research_summary:
The Danish Energy Agency press release dated 14 October 2024 states that DEA adopts the plan for Kattegat and Kriegers Flak II. This is the best accessible official date for project-plan consent/adoption.

source_of_record_url:
https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-vedtager-plan-havvindmoelleparkerne-kattegat-og-kriegers-flak-ii


wind_farm_id: 6357
canonical_id: 83e20506-4425-4a75-929f-a4fba827f768
wind_farm_name: Kriegers Flak II
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency preliminary investigations page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No concessionaire has been confirmed and no project FID has been identified in accessible official or owner sources.


wind_farm_id: 6357
canonical_id: 83e20506-4425-4a75-929f-a4fba827f768
wind_farm_name: Kriegers Flak II
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 31/12/2030
resolved_value: 31/12/2030
research_value: 31/12/2030
resolved_fact_id: 40556.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://eu.eu-supply.com/ctm/Supplier/PublicPurchase/399416/1/0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EU-Supply public RFT
source_of_record_url: https://eu.eu-supply.com/ctm/Supplier/PublicPurchase/399416/1/0
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
DEA hearing material says the park is planned to be commissioned by the end of 2030, and the RFT states the concessionaire must establish the wind farm before 31 December 2030. This is a planned target date, not an achieved commissioning milestone.


wind_farm_id: 6385
canonical_id: af318387-8f29-4424-8630-cc2925170931
wind_farm_name: Bornholm II
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Bornholm II; part of Bornholm Energy Island / Energiø Bornholm
research_value: Bornholm II; part of Bornholm Energy Island / Energiø Bornholm
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/5937/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ramboll report for Energinet – Bornholm II site location
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/5937/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official sources describe Bornholm II as one of the designated offshore wind farm areas within the wider Bornholm Energy Island project. Current official programme material uses the umbrella name Bornholm Energy Island / Energiø Bornholm rather than a separate branded project company for Bornholm II.


wind_farm_id: 6385
canonical_id: af318387-8f29-4424-8630-cc2925170931
wind_farm_name: Bornholm II
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 40557.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/bornholm-energy-island
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – Bornholm Energy Island
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/bornholm-energy-island
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Danish state-led programme via Danish Energy Agency for offshore tendering; Energinet for grid/onshore transmission. Current owner(s): Not confirmed. Operator: Not confirmed.

resolved_value:
Developer: Danish state-led programme via Danish Energy Agency for offshore tendering; Energinet for grid/onshore transmission. Current owner(s): Not confirmed. Operator: Not confirmed.

research_summary:
Freshest ownership/governance evidence relied on is 03/02/2026 KEFM and 26/01/2026 KEFM. These confirm Bornholm Energy Island is being realised as a Danish-German public programme, with the Danish Energy Agency handling the offshore wind tender and Energinet / 50Hertz handling transmission infrastructure. No separate awarded private wind-farm owner for Bornholm II was confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6385
canonical_id: af318387-8f29-4424-8630-cc2925170931
wind_farm_name: Bornholm II
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: No private equity ownership history confirmed for Bornholm II as a standalone project
research_value: No private equity ownership history confirmed for Bornholm II as a standalone project
citation_url: https://www.kefm.dk/aktuelt/nyheder/2026/feb/bred-politisk-aftale-om-energioe-bornholm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: KEFM – Broad political agreement on Energiø Bornholm
source_of_record_url: https://www.kefm.dk/aktuelt/nyheder/2026/feb/bred-politisk-aftale-om-energioe-bornholm
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on is 03/02/2026 KEFM. Public sources show the project has remained in state-led development and cross-border planning. No awarded concessionaire, JV equity split, or transfer history specific to Bornholm II was found. Energinet and 50Hertz are confirmed infrastructure partners, but not wind-farm equity owners of a completed Bornholm II asset.


wind_farm_id: 6385
canonical_id: af318387-8f29-4424-8630-cc2925170931
wind_farm_name: Bornholm II
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Development Zone / lease area
resolved_value: Development Zone / lease area
research_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
resolved_fact_id: 40642.0
resolved_source_type: community
resolved_source_name: Community approved
resolved_source_detail: approved community correction #10
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Community approved
research_source_name: KEFM – Denmark agrees with Germany on Energiø Bornholm
research_source_type: government
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: community
community_approved_note_count: 1
community_correction_count: 1
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 1
community_supports_resolved_value: 1
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Chosen as the closest Boundary Layer label. Official and regulator-style material confirms Bornholm II is a defined reserved/development area within the Bornholm Energy Island programme and subject to plan-level/SEA work, but no project-specific construction consent or awarded developer for Bornholm II was confirmed. The wider programme advanced politically in 2026, but KEFM also says a competitive offshore wind tender is the next milestone, so Bornholm II itself is still pre-award / pre-project-consent.

research_source_url:
https://www.kefm.dk/aktuelt/nyheder/2026/jan/danmark-indgaar-aftale-med-tyskland-om-energioe-bornholm-


wind_farm_id: 6385
canonical_id: af318387-8f29-4424-8630-cc2925170931
wind_farm_name: Bornholm II
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 7395.0
resolved_source_type: emodnet
resolved_source_name: EMODnet Human Activities
resolved_source_detail: EMODnet Jan 2026
citation_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMODnet Human Activities
source_of_record_type: public data portal
source_of_record_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
source_of_record_licence: Free and open public portal
research_source_name: Danish Energy Agency – Bornholm Energy Island
research_source_type: government
research_source_url: https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/bornholm-energy-island
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Official sources confirm Bornholm Energy Island at minimum 3 GW and up to 3.8 GW including overplanting, but they do not allocate a separate installed capacity to Bornholm II alone. Because the user asked for this project specifically and phase allocation is not explicit, the Bornholm II-only capacity is left Not confirmed rather than inferred.


wind_farm_id: 6385
canonical_id: af318387-8f29-4424-8630-cc2925170931
wind_farm_name: Bornholm II
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.50hertz.com/en/Grid/Griddevelopement/Offshoreprojects/BornholmEnergyIsland
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: 50Hertz – BEI interconnector Bornholm-Germany
source_of_record_url: https://www.50hertz.com/en/Grid/Griddevelopement/Offshoreprojects/BornholmEnergyIsland
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No Bornholm II-specific MEC found. For the wider programme, 50Hertz states 2,000 MW to Germany and 1,200 MW to Zealand, but that is for the overall BEI transmission system, not explicitly Bornholm II. To avoid conflating programme export infrastructure with site-specific MEC, Bornholm II MEC is left Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6385
canonical_id: af318387-8f29-4424-8630-cc2925170931
wind_farm_name: Bornholm II
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/5901/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ramboll / DEA technical report – Energy Islands Bornholm
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/5901/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided in the prompt, and project-specific web sources do not confirm a Bornholm II turbine model. SEA material only uses illustrative 15 MW and 27 MW scenarios for the wider programme, which is not a site-specific award or procurement confirmation.


wind_farm_id: 6385
canonical_id: af318387-8f29-4424-8630-cc2925170931
wind_farm_name: Bornholm II
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/5901/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ramboll / DEA technical report – Energy Islands Bornholm
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/5901/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No Bornholm II-specific turbine OEM was confirmed. Available official material is still at programme planning stage and uses scenario assumptions only.


wind_farm_id: 6385
canonical_id: af318387-8f29-4424-8630-cc2925170931
wind_farm_name: Bornholm II
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/5901/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ramboll / DEA technical report – Energy Islands Bornholm
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/5901/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No site-specific turbine rating for Bornholm II was awarded or confirmed. SEA material references planning scenarios using 15 MW and 27 MW turbines for the wider Bornholm Energy Island assessment only, which should not be treated as a confirmed Bornholm II specification.


wind_farm_id: 6385
canonical_id: af318387-8f29-4424-8630-cc2925170931
wind_farm_name: Bornholm II
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/5901/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ramboll / DEA technical report – Energy Islands Bornholm
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/5901/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No Bornholm II-specific rotor diameter confirmed. The planning/SEA report lists 233 m and 300 m for illustrative programme scenarios, not an awarded Bornholm II turbine package.


wind_farm_id: 6385
canonical_id: af318387-8f29-4424-8630-cc2925170931
wind_farm_name: Bornholm II
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/5901/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ramboll / DEA technical report – Energy Islands Bornholm
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/5901/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No Bornholm II-specific hub height confirmed. The wider programme SEA uses notional values of 146.5 m and 180 m for scenario testing only; these are not adopted Bornholm II project specs.


wind_farm_id: 6385
canonical_id: af318387-8f29-4424-8630-cc2925170931
wind_farm_name: Bornholm II
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 8533.0
resolved_source_type: emodnet
resolved_source_name: EMODnet Human Activities
resolved_source_detail: EMODnet Jan 2026
citation_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMODnet Human Activities
source_of_record_type: public data portal
source_of_record_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
source_of_record_licence: Free and open public portal
research_source_name: Ramboll / DEA technical report – Energy Islands Bornholm
research_source_type: consultant report for government
research_source_url: https://ens.dk/media/5901/download
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Web sources do not confirm a Bornholm II-only turbine count. SEA material gives only whole-programme indicative counts (for Bornholm Energy Island overall) under scenario assumptions. This therefore differs from and does not validate the non-web database hint of 0; the likely reason is that EMODnet is representing the area as an undeveloped concept, while public web sources discuss a broader multi-area programme without fixing Bornholm II-specific turbine numbers.


wind_farm_id: 6385
canonical_id: af318387-8f29-4424-8630-cc2925170931
wind_farm_name: Bornholm II
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/5933/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Gardline / Energinet geotechnical report
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/5933/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Geotechnical work explicitly states it is intended to inform evaluation of wind turbine foundation design and installation, but no chosen foundation type for Bornholm II was confirmed in accessible project-specific sources.


wind_farm_id: 6385
canonical_id: af318387-8f29-4424-8630-cc2925170931
wind_farm_name: Bornholm II
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/danish-energy-agency-publishes-plan-program-bornholm-energy-island
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – Plan for Program Bornholm Energy Island
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/danish-energy-agency-publishes-plan-program-bornholm-energy-island
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The 13/05/2024 Plan for Program set a planning framework for the wider Bornholm Energy Island, but DEA explicitly states the plan alone does not allow for construction of facilities. No Bornholm II project-specific construction consent date was found.


wind_farm_id: 6385
canonical_id: af318387-8f29-4424-8630-cc2925170931
wind_farm_name: Bornholm II
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.kefm.dk/aktuelt/nyheder/2026/feb/bred-politisk-aftale-om-energioe-bornholm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: KEFM – Broad political agreement on Energiø Bornholm
source_of_record_url: https://www.kefm.dk/aktuelt/nyheder/2026/feb/bred-politisk-aftale-om-energioe-bornholm
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No Bornholm II project-level FID found. The 2026 Danish-German political agreement advances the wider programme, but does not constitute a wind-farm FID for a separately awarded Bornholm II asset.


wind_farm_id: 6385
canonical_id: af318387-8f29-4424-8630-cc2925170931
wind_farm_name: Bornholm II
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.kefm.dk/aktuelt/nyheder/2026/feb/bred-politisk-aftale-om-energioe-bornholm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: KEFM – Broad political agreement on Energiø Bornholm
source_of_record_url: https://www.kefm.dk/aktuelt/nyheder/2026/feb/bred-politisk-aftale-om-energioe-bornholm
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No Bornholm II first-power date found. The freshest official programme source says Bornholm Energy Island is expected to be ready to send green power into the two countries’ power systems from 2034, but that is programme-level and not a Bornholm II commissioning milestone.


wind_farm_id: 6385
canonical_id: af318387-8f29-4424-8630-cc2925170931
wind_farm_name: Bornholm II
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: 50Hertz / Energinet press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.50hertz.com/Portals/1/Dokumente/Medien/Pressemitteilungen/2025/20250905_BEI_Siemens-Energy_EN.pdf?ver=w7N3pcoA1NdW6yBIQ8GtOQ%3D%3D

research_summary:
No Bornholm II full commissioning date found. Wider programme sources point to mid-2030s infrastructure delivery / 2034 readiness for the overall energy-island system, not a separate Bornholm II wind farm COD.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.50hertz.com/Portals/1/Dokumente/Medien/Pressemitteilungen/2025/20250905_BEI_Siemens-Energy_EN.pdf?ver=w7N3pcoA1NdW6yBIQ8GtOQ%3D%3D


wind_farm_id: 6391
canonical_id: b1ac0f6d-0bb2-4072-a549-5cdb727427ac
wind_farm_name: Belwind I & II
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Belwind phase 1 (also referred to as Belwind I / Bligh Bank Phase I)
research_value: Belwind phase 1 (also referred to as Belwind I / Bligh Bank Phase I)
citation_url: https://www.eib.org/attachments/press/090724-belwind-press-joint-final.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Belwind financing close release PDF
source_of_record_url: https://www.eib.org/attachments/press/090724-belwind-press-joint-final.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Phase ambiguity resolved as follows: Parkwind’s current Belwind page describes the combined Belwind asset as 171 MW and 56 turbines because it includes the later Haliade demo turbine, while Belgian Offshore Platform explicitly states the core Belwind wind farm comprises 55 Vestas turbines with 165 MW; the 2009 financing release also defines the researched asset as the 165 MW first phase of Bligh Bank.


wind_farm_id: 6391
canonical_id: b1ac0f6d-0bb2-4072-a549-5cdb727427ac
wind_farm_name: Belwind I & II
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35987.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: unavailable
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Parkwind. Current owners (project equity): 41% Parkwind, 39% Sumitomo, 20% Meewind. Operator: Parkwind / JERA Nex bp platform

resolved_value:
Developer: Parkwind. Current owners (project equity): 41% Parkwind, 39% Sumitomo, 20% Meewind. Operator: Parkwind / JERA Nex bp platform

citation_url:
https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/en-lu/knowledge/publications/816b71d7/global-offshore-wind-belgium


wind_farm_id: 6391
canonical_id: b1ac0f6d-0bb2-4072-a549-5cdb727427ac
wind_farm_name: Belwind I & II
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.sumitomocorp.com/en/jp/news/release/2014/group/20141001_2
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Sumitomo Corporation release
source_of_record_url: https://www.sumitomocorp.com/en/jp/news/release/2014/group/20141001_2
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
24/07/2009: consortium including PMV, Meewind and Rabo Project Equity; 01/10/2014: Sumitomo acquired shares in Belwind from Parkwind; current full project equity split Not confirmed

research_value:
24/07/2009: consortium including PMV, Meewind and Rabo Project Equity; 01/10/2014: Sumitomo acquired shares in Belwind from Parkwind; current full project equity split Not confirmed

research_summary:
Ownership history is partly confirmable but current percentages are not. The 24/07/2009 financing-close release identifies PMV, Meewind and Rabo Project Equity in the original owner consortium. Sumitomo’s dated 01/10/2014 release confirms it purchased shares in Belwind from Parkwind. Freshest source date relied on for broader ownership context is JERA’s Parkwind page confirming JERA acquired 100% of Parkwind NV in 07/2023, but this still does not disclose the full current Belwind SPV cap table, so percentages remain Not confirmed rather than inferred.


wind_farm_id: 6391
canonical_id: b1ac0f6d-0bb2-4072-a549-5cdb727427ac
wind_farm_name: Belwind I & II
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/publications/annual-environmental-report-2010-belwind-phase-1
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Tethys record for Belwind phase 1 environmental report
source_of_record_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/publications/annual-environmental-report-2010-belwind-phase-1
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Web sources accessed confirm a 150 kV export cable and offshore high-voltage station, but I did not find an openly accessible authoritative source explicitly stating a project MEC value for Belwind phase 1. Gross installed capacity should therefore not be relabelled as MEC.


wind_farm_id: 6392
canonical_id: b7e39a75-89b1-48d1-9b64-d27c48c865a4
wind_farm_name: Berwick Bank Wind Farm
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Berwick Bank Wind Farm
research_value: Berwick Bank Wind Farm
citation_url: https://www.berwickbank.com/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Berwick Bank official project website
source_of_record_url: https://www.berwickbank.com/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official project website and SSE both use Berwick Bank Wind Farm. Historic naming nuance: SSE said in September 2021 that two development proposals were combined into one larger project under the Berwick Bank name; third-party historical summaries also note links to earlier Seagreen 2 and 3 concepts.


wind_farm_id: 6392
canonical_id: b7e39a75-89b1-48d1-9b64-d27c48c865a4
wind_farm_name: Berwick Bank Wind Farm
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 33840.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.sse.com/media/pf3fsfak/sse-plc-annual-report.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SSE Annual Report 2025
source_of_record_url: https://www.sse.com/media/pf3fsfak/sse-plc-annual-report.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: SSE Renewables; Current owner: SSE plc group via Berwick Bank Wind Farm Limited / SSE Renewables subsidiaries; Equity partners: Not confirmed; Operator: SSE Renewables

resolved_value:
Developer: SSE Renewables; Current owner: SSE plc group via Berwick Bank Wind Farm Limited / SSE Renewables subsidiaries; Equity partners: Not confirmed; Operator: SSE Renewables

research_summary:
Freshest ownership evidence relied on is SSE Annual Report 2025 (published 2025) showing Berwick Bank Wind Farm Limited as a 100.0% SSE group subsidiary. Project materials describe the applicant/project company as a wholly owned SSE Renewables subsidiary. No credible current JV split was found; therefore ownership is treated as wholly SSE group-owned on available evidence.


wind_farm_id: 6392
canonical_id: b7e39a75-89b1-48d1-9b64-d27c48c865a4
wind_farm_name: Berwick Bank Wind Farm
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Developed within SSE/SSE Renewables portfolio; no confirmed equity sale or partner entry found
research_value: Developed within SSE/SSE Renewables portfolio; no confirmed equity sale or partner entry found
citation_url: https://www.sse.com/media/pf3fsfak/sse-plc-annual-report.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SSE Annual Report 2025
source_of_record_url: https://www.sse.com/media/pf3fsfak/sse-plc-annual-report.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on is 2025 from SSE’s annual reporting, which still shows the project company within the SSE group at 100%. Earlier project and scoping documents also describe the applicant as a wholly owned SSE Renewables subsidiary. No authoritative dated source located during this search showed a later transfer, farm-down, or operator change.


wind_farm_id: 6392
canonical_id: b7e39a75-89b1-48d1-9b64-d27c48c865a4
wind_farm_name: Berwick Bank Wind Farm
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Consented
resolved_value: Consented
research_value: Consented
resolved_fact_id: 33841.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.berwickbank.com/planning-overview
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Berwick Bank planning overview
source_of_record_url: https://www.berwickbank.com/planning-overview
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project website says offshore consent was granted in July 2025 and SSE’s July 2025 release says Scottish Government granted consent for the offshore array. Although Berwick Bank B secured a CfD in January 2026, SSE says it will now progress that phase towards FID expected in 2027, so the closest Boundary Layer label remains Consented, not FID Taken, Pre-Construction.


wind_farm_id: 6392
canonical_id: b7e39a75-89b1-48d1-9b64-d27c48c865a4
wind_farm_name: Berwick Bank Wind Farm
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 4,100 MW
resolved_value: 4,100 MW
research_value: 4,100 MW
resolved_fact_id: 33842.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.berwickbank.com/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Berwick Bank official project website
source_of_record_url: https://www.berwickbank.com/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The official project website and SSE portfolio page both state the project has potential to deliver up to 4.1 GW installed capacity. This aligns with the database validation context.


wind_farm_id: 6392
canonical_id: b7e39a75-89b1-48d1-9b64-d27c48c865a4
wind_farm_name: Berwick Bank Wind Farm
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.berwickbank.com/project
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Berwick Bank project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.berwickbank.com/project
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Sources consistently confirm installed/planned generation capacity of 4.1 GW, two grid connection points, and HVDC export infrastructure, but no authoritative openly accessible source reviewed here gave a clearly labelled project MEC value distinct from installed capacity. To avoid conflating gross capacity with export capacity, MEC is left Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6392
canonical_id: b7e39a75-89b1-48d1-9b64-d27c48c865a4
wind_farm_name: Berwick Bank Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://berwickbank-eia.com/offshore-eia/vol1-ch03-Project-Description/part-0.html
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Berwick Bank Offshore EIA Project Description
source_of_record_url: https://berwickbank-eia.com/offshore-eia/vol1-ch03-Project-Description/part-0.html
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources do not confirm a selected turbine model. The consent/EIA material explicitly says the make and model are yet to be selected and uses a design-envelope approach only. Per instruction, no model is inferred from generic OEM pages or other wind farms.


wind_farm_id: 6392
canonical_id: b7e39a75-89b1-48d1-9b64-d27c48c865a4
wind_farm_name: Berwick Bank Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://berwickbank-eia.com/offshore-eia/vol1-ch03-Project-Description/part-0.html
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Berwick Bank Offshore EIA Project Description
source_of_record_url: https://berwickbank-eia.com/offshore-eia/vol1-ch03-Project-Description/part-0.html
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific authoritative source found a selected OEM. The project documentation states turbine make/model remain to be selected.


wind_farm_id: 6392
canonical_id: b7e39a75-89b1-48d1-9b64-d27c48c865a4
wind_farm_name: Berwick Bank Wind Farm
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://berwickbank-eia.com/offshore-eia/vol1-ch03-Project-Description/part-0.html
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Berwick Bank Offshore EIA Project Description
source_of_record_url: https://berwickbank-eia.com/offshore-eia/vol1-ch03-Project-Description/part-0.html
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No selected turbine has been confirmed for the specific project. The consent documents discuss a range of turbine capacities within a project design envelope rather than a chosen installed unit rating.


wind_farm_id: 6392
canonical_id: b7e39a75-89b1-48d1-9b64-d27c48c865a4
wind_farm_name: Berwick Bank Wind Farm
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/eor0762_1.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Protected Area Assessment Report
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/eor0762_1.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Only design-envelope maxima were found, not an as-selected project turbine rotor diameter. The EIA/PDE states a maximum rotor diameter up to 310 m and for the smallest turbine option 222 m, but no final site-specific rotor diameter is confirmed; therefore the row remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6392
canonical_id: b7e39a75-89b1-48d1-9b64-d27c48c865a4
wind_farm_name: Berwick Bank Wind Farm
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/eor0762_1.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Protected Area Assessment Report
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/eor0762_1.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Only a project design-envelope maximum was found, not a confirmed selected turbine hub height. The EIA/PDE gives maximum hub height (above LAT) 200 m, but that is not a final turbine specification, so hub height is left Not confirmed rather than inferred.


wind_farm_id: 6392
canonical_id: b7e39a75-89b1-48d1-9b64-d27c48c865a4
wind_farm_name: Berwick Bank Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 307
resolved_value: 307
research_value: 307
resolved_fact_id: 33843.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/eor0762_1.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Protected Area Assessment Report
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/eor0762_1.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Multiple project-specific sources state the project comprises up to 307 turbines. This aligns with the non-web validation signals provided in context, which also pointed to 307 as the winner candidate / EMODnet hint. The wording remains “up to” because the final installed count depends on selected turbine rating and final design.


wind_farm_id: 6392
canonical_id: b7e39a75-89b1-48d1-9b64-d27c48c865a4
wind_farm_name: Berwick Bank Wind Farm
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Fixed-bottom jacket foundations; consent envelope includes piled jacket and suction caisson jacket
resolved_value: Fixed-bottom jacket foundations; consent envelope includes piled jacket and suction caisson jacket
research_value: Fixed-bottom jacket foundations; consent envelope includes piled jacket and suction caisson jacket
resolved_fact_id: 33844.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/eor0762_1.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Protected Area Assessment Report
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/eor0762_1.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific consent documentation explicitly describes two wind-turbine foundation options in the design envelope: piled jacket and suction caisson jacket. Recent reporting also characterises the project as fixed-bottom. Best reading: confirmed foundation class is fixed-bottom, with jacket variants still within the consent envelope rather than a single final as-built choice.


wind_farm_id: 6392
canonical_id: b7e39a75-89b1-48d1-9b64-d27c48c865a4
wind_farm_name: Berwick Bank Wind Farm
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 31/07/2025
resolved_value: 31/07/2025
research_value: 31/07/2025
resolved_fact_id: 33845.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SSE consent announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.sse.com/news-and-views/2025/07/green-light-for-berwick-bank-paves-way-for-world-s-largest-offshore-wind-farm/

research_summary:
SSE’s dated release on 31 July 2025 announced the Scottish Government had granted consent; the project site planning page also states offshore consent was granted in July 2025.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.sse.com/news-and-views/2025/07/green-light-for-berwick-bank-paves-way-for-world-s-largest-offshore-wind-farm/


wind_farm_id: 6392
canonical_id: b7e39a75-89b1-48d1-9b64-d27c48c865a4
wind_farm_name: Berwick Bank Wind Farm
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.sserenewables.com/news-and-views/2026/01/sse-secures-cfd-for-berwick-bank-wind-farm/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SSE CfD announcement
source_of_record_url: https://www.sserenewables.com/news-and-views/2026/01/sse-secures-cfd-for-berwick-bank-wind-farm/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No FID has yet been confirmed. SSE’s dated January 2026 CfD release says Berwick Bank B will now be progressed towards FID, expected in 2027, so FID has not yet been taken.


wind_farm_id: 6392
canonical_id: b7e39a75-89b1-48d1-9b64-d27c48c865a4
wind_farm_name: Berwick Bank Wind Farm
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.sserenewables.com/news-and-views/2026/01/sse-secures-cfd-for-berwick-bank-wind-farm/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SSE CfD announcement
source_of_record_url: https://www.sserenewables.com/news-and-views/2026/01/sse-secures-cfd-for-berwick-bank-wind-farm/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No first power date is confirmed because the project is not yet under construction and FID has not yet been taken.


wind_farm_id: 6392
canonical_id: b7e39a75-89b1-48d1-9b64-d27c48c865a4
wind_farm_name: Berwick Bank Wind Farm
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Berwick Bank alternatives chapter
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://berwickbank-eia.com/offshore-eia/vol1-ch04-site-selection-and-considerations-of-alternatives/part-1.html

research_summary:
No full commissioning date is confirmed. Sources discuss targeted delivery timing and grid connection strategy, but not a final commissioned date backed by a formal post-FID delivery schedule.

source_of_record_url:
https://berwickbank-eia.com/offshore-eia/vol1-ch04-site-selection-and-considerations-of-alternatives/part-1.html


wind_farm_id: 6393
canonical_id: 6dd6873c-5872-47cc-b417-f52864be22f2
wind_farm_name: C-Power
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://c-power.be/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: C-Power home
source_of_record_url: https://c-power.be/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
C-Power offshore wind farm on Thornton Bank, Belgium; also referred to as Thornton Bank / Thorntonbank wind farm

research_value:
C-Power offshore wind farm on Thornton Bank, Belgium; also referred to as Thornton Bank / Thorntonbank wind farm

research_summary:
Official C-Power pages describe the project as a far-shore wind farm on the Thornton Bank; Belgian Offshore Platform uses the same project identity. This resolves the name ambiguity as the built Belgian offshore wind farm, not a broader offshore zone.


wind_farm_id: 6393
canonical_id: 6dd6873c-5872-47cc-b417-f52864be22f2
wind_farm_name: C-Power
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 36001.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://c-power.be/en/info/About%20us
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: C-Power About us
source_of_record_url: https://c-power.be/en/info/About%20us
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: C-Power NV. Current owners: DEME Concessions, SRIW Environnement, Socofe, Z-Kracht, Nuhma, De Vlaamse Energieholding, RWE Renewables, EDF Renewables, Marguerite Pantheon fund. Operator: C-Power NV (with turbine maintenance via subsidiary THBMS)

resolved_value:
Developer: C-Power NV. Current owners: DEME Concessions, SRIW Environnement, Socofe, Z-Kracht, Nuhma, De Vlaamse Energieholding, RWE Renewables, EDF Renewables, Marguerite Pantheon fund. Operator: C-Power NV (with turbine maintenance via subsidiary THBMS)

research_summary:
C-Power says it was established to develop, build and operate the project. The freshest ownership evidence available from accessible project pages is the live C-Power “About us” page, which lists the current shareholder group named here; the partner page confirms THBMS as the maintenance subsidiary. Freshest source relied on: current live C-Power ownership page, recently crawled, but undated. Exact current percentage split was not confirmed from accessible web sources that reconcile to 100%.


wind_farm_id: 6393
canonical_id: 6dd6873c-5872-47cc-b417-f52864be22f2
wind_farm_name: C-Power
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.marguerite.com/marguerite-pantheon-sells-stake-in-belgian-offshore-wind-farm-c-power/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marguerite 2024 sale notice
source_of_record_url: https://www.marguerite.com/marguerite-pantheon-sells-stake-in-belgian-offshore-wind-farm-c-power/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Original shareholder group included DEME, EDF Energies Nouvelles, Nuhma, RWE Innogy, Socofe and SRIW Environnement; Marguerite entered in 2011 via EDF EN stake sale and sold a 10% stake to co-shareholders on 02/02/2024

research_value:
Original shareholder group included DEME, EDF Energies Nouvelles, Nuhma, RWE Innogy, Socofe and SRIW Environnement; Marguerite entered in 2011 via EDF EN stake sale and sold a 10% stake to co-shareholders on 02/02/2024

research_summary:
Freshest dated ownership-history source is Marguerite’s 2024 sale notice, which says a 10% stake was sold to co-shareholders on 02/02/2024. Marguerite’s 21/12/2011 release says it acquired a stake from EDF Energies Nouvelles and describes the earlier shareholder group. Freshest source date relied on: 02/02/2024. Current post-2024 percentage allocation remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6393
canonical_id: 6dd6873c-5872-47cc-b417-f52864be22f2
wind_farm_name: C-Power
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 36002.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://c-power.be/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: C-Power home
source_of_record_url: https://c-power.be/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
C-Power says construction was finalised in 2013 and the wind farm is fully operational; Belgian Offshore Platform says the turbines have been operational in phases since 2009, 2012 and 2013.


wind_farm_id: 6393
canonical_id: 6dd6873c-5872-47cc-b417-f52864be22f2
wind_farm_name: C-Power
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 325.2 MW
resolved_value: 325.2 MW
research_value: 325.2 MW
resolved_fact_id: 36003.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://c-power.be/en/technology/Windturbines
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: C-Power wind turbines page
source_of_record_url: https://c-power.be/en/technology/Windturbines
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
C-Power’s turbine page gives the more precise as-built installed capacity of 325.2 MW; Belgian Offshore Platform rounds this to 325 MW. The 325.2 MW figure also matches the IEA/FPS Economy table.


wind_farm_id: 6393
canonical_id: 6dd6873c-5872-47cc-b417-f52864be22f2
wind_farm_name: C-Power
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://c-power.be/en/technology/Cables
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: C-Power cables page
source_of_record_url: https://c-power.be/en/technology/Cables
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Accessible project sources confirm two 150 kV export cables and 150 kV grid injection, but no authoritative accessible source located during this search explicitly stated MEC in MW. To avoid confusing installed capacity with export voltage, MEC is left Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6393
canonical_id: 6dd6873c-5872-47cc-b417-f52864be22f2
wind_farm_name: C-Power
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 36004.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Phase 1: Senvion 5M; Phases 2-3: Senvion 6M; linked EuroWindWakes fallback for later-stage spec detail: 6.2M126

resolved_value:
Phase 1: Senvion 5M; Phases 2-3: Senvion 6M; linked EuroWindWakes fallback for later-stage spec detail: 6.2M126

research_summary:
Project-specific web sources clearly show a mixed fleet: 6 × 5 MW Senvion 5M and 48 × 6.15 MW Senvion 6M. Because detailed project-specific turbine spec evidence for the later-stage units was incomplete, the linked EuroWindWakes fallback was used as required for later-stage spec detail, indicating 6.2M126.


wind_farm_id: 6393
canonical_id: 6dd6873c-5872-47cc-b417-f52864be22f2
wind_farm_name: C-Power
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Senvion
resolved_value: Senvion
research_value: Senvion
resolved_fact_id: 9015.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Belgian Offshore Platform project page
research_source_type: industry association
research_source_url: https://www.belgianoffshoreplatform.be/en/projects/c-power/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
C-Power and Belgian Offshore Platform both identify the turbines as Senvion. Historic documents use the REpower name for the same platform family, but current project-facing sources use Senvion.


wind_farm_id: 6393
canonical_id: 6dd6873c-5872-47cc-b417-f52864be22f2
wind_farm_name: C-Power
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 6.15 (48), 5.08 (6)
resolved_value: 6.15 (48), 5.08 (6)
research_value: Phase 1: 5 MW; Phases 2-3: 6.15 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9325.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: C-Power wind turbines page
research_source_type: official project website
research_source_url: https://c-power.be/en/technology/Windturbines
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web evidence is clear that the project is mixed: the first 6 turbines are 5 MW, while the later 48 turbines are 6.15 MW. The linked EuroWindWakes fallback also aligns with 6.15 MW for the later-stage turbine units.


wind_farm_id: 6393
canonical_id: 6dd6873c-5872-47cc-b417-f52864be22f2
wind_farm_name: C-Power
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 126
resolved_value: 126
research_value: 126 m
resolved_fact_id: 9480.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Belgian Offshore Platform explicitly gives rotor diameter 126 m. Project-specific web sources were otherwise limited on this field, so the linked EuroWindWakes fallback value of 126 m was used as the required confirmation for later-stage turbine specification detail.


wind_farm_id: 6393
canonical_id: 6dd6873c-5872-47cc-b417-f52864be22f2
wind_farm_name: C-Power
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 94
resolved_value: 94
research_value: 94 m
resolved_fact_id: 9635.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific accessible web sources did not clearly state hub height for the relevant turbine units. Per the required fallback rule, the linked EuroWindWakes project turbine metadata value of 94 m was used. Belgian Offshore Platform’s “Height: 158 m” appears to be overall turbine height, not hub height.


wind_farm_id: 6393
canonical_id: 6dd6873c-5872-47cc-b417-f52864be22f2
wind_farm_name: C-Power
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 54
resolved_value: 54
research_value: 54
resolved_fact_id: 48155.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 54 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: C-Power home
research_source_type: official project website
research_source_url: https://c-power.be/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
C-Power, Belgian Offshore Platform and the IEA/FPS Economy table all state 54 turbines. This aligns with the non-web validation signals in the task context, which also indicate 54 linked turbines.


wind_farm_id: 6393
canonical_id: 6dd6873c-5872-47cc-b417-f52864be22f2
wind_farm_name: C-Power
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Phase 1: gravity-based; Phases 2-3: jacket
resolved_value: Phase 1: gravity-based; Phases 2-3: jacket
research_value: Phase 1: gravity-based; Phases 2-3: jacket
resolved_fact_id: 36010.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/wind-project-sites/c-powerthornton-bank
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Tethys C-Power/Thornton Bank project page
source_of_record_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/wind-project-sites/c-powerthornton-bank
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
An openly accessible project summary page hosted by Tethys states the phase split directly: “Phase 1 - Construction of pilot phase with 6 turbines (5 MW each), gravity-based foundations” and “Phase 3 - Addition of 18 turbines (6.15 MW each), jacket foundations”; the companion project report excerpt also states “Phase 1 ... on gravity base foundations (GBF)” and “Phase 2 ... 49 jacket foundations (JF)”. This supports the phase-level classification used here while avoiding the previously failed source quote.


wind_farm_id: 6393
canonical_id: 6dd6873c-5872-47cc-b417-f52864be22f2
wind_farm_name: C-Power
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/01/2003
resolved_value: 01/01/2003
research_value: 01/01/2003
resolved_fact_id: 36011.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://c-power.be/en/info/Concession
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: C-Power concession page
source_of_record_url: https://c-power.be/en/info/Concession
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
C-Power says it obtained the domain concession and permits in 2003. No more precise public date was confirmed, so the year-only value is normalized to 01/01/2003.


wind_farm_id: 6393
canonical_id: 6dd6873c-5872-47cc-b417-f52864be22f2
wind_farm_name: C-Power
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 25/11/2010
resolved_value: 25/11/2010
research_value: 25/11/2010
resolved_fact_id: 36012.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://green-giraffe.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/101125_c-power_press_release.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: C-Power financing press release PDF
source_of_record_url: https://green-giraffe.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/101125_c-power_press_release.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The clearest project-specific finance milestone is C-Power’s announcement on 25/11/2010 that it had closed financing for phases 2 and 3; this is used as the closest accessible FID-equivalent milestone for the built project. Marguerite’s 2011 release independently references the same financing close.


wind_farm_id: 6393
canonical_id: 6dd6873c-5872-47cc-b417-f52864be22f2
wind_farm_name: C-Power
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/01/2009
resolved_value: 01/01/2009
research_value: 01/01/2009
resolved_fact_id: 36013.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.belgianoffshoreplatform.be/en/projects/c-power/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Belgian Offshore Platform project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.belgianoffshoreplatform.be/en/projects/c-power/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Belgian Offshore Platform says the project has produced green energy since 2009 for phase 1, and C-Power’s 03/07/2013 release says the pilot project commenced generating power in 2009. Exact first-export day was not confirmed, so the year-only value is normalized to 01/01/2009.


wind_farm_id: 6393
canonical_id: 6dd6873c-5872-47cc-b417-f52864be22f2
wind_farm_name: C-Power
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2013-09-01 (48), 2009-05-01 (6)
resolved_value: 2013-09-01 (48), 2009-05-01 (6)
research_value: 01/09/2013
resolved_fact_id: 9790.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: IEA Wind Annual Report 2015 PDF
research_source_type: industry/government report
research_source_url: https://www.seai.ie/sites/default/files/publications/IEA_Wind_Annual_Report_2015.pdf
research_source_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
C-Power’s 03/07/2013 release says all turbines were forecast to be running at full capacity in September 2013, and the IEA/FPS Economy table says the project was fully operational since September 2013. Month-level evidence is normalized to 01/09/2013.


wind_farm_id: 6394
canonical_id: 7534f036-c35c-40e7-b389-7ab276456058
wind_farm_name: Energiø Nordsøen
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Energiø Nordsøen
research_value: Energiø Nordsøen
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/miljoevurderinger-energioe-nordsoe
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – Miljøvurderinger Energiø Nordsø
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/miljoevurderinger-energioe-nordsoe
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official Danish naming on government pages is Energiø Nordsøen / Energiø Nordsø; English-language official material uses “the energy island in the North Sea”. The asset is a proposed offshore energy-island / hub with surrounding phased wind build-out, not a built standalone wind farm.


wind_farm_id: 6394
canonical_id: 7534f036-c35c-40e7-b389-7ab276456058
wind_farm_name: Energiø Nordsøen
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 40559.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Danish state / Danish Energy Agency-led public development framework; future private co-owner planned but not appointed. Current owner(s): Not confirmed. Operator: Energinet for the electricity infrastructure.

resolved_value:
Developer: Danish state / Danish Energy Agency-led public development framework; future private co-owner planned but not appointed. Current owner(s): Not confirmed. Operator: Energinet for the electricity infrastructure.

citation_url:
https://ens.dk/en/press/danish-energy-agency-sets-time-tender-energy-island-north-sea-and-maintains-overall-schedule

research_summary:
Freshest dated authoritative source relied on: Energinet half-year report published in 2024 confirms Energinet’s North Sea platform-model proposal remained in political treatment; DEA background material confirms the island is intended to be owned in partnership between the State and one or more private actors, but no private co-owner has been selected. Older DEA tender material states a planned 50.1% state / 49.9% private split and that Energinet will build, develop and operate the electricity infrastructure.

source_of_record_name:
Danish Energy Agency – The Danish Energy Agency sets time to tender for the energy island in the North Sea and maintains the overall schedule

source_of_record_url:
https://ens.dk/en/press/danish-energy-agency-sets-time-tender-energy-island-north-sea-and-maintains-overall-schedule


wind_farm_id: 6394
canonical_id: 7534f036-c35c-40e7-b389-7ab276456058
wind_farm_name: Energiø Nordsøen
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: KEFM – Politisk aftale bringer energiøen i Nordsøen tættere på realisering
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Planned public-private structure: State majority ownership with private minority co-owner(s); no final project company ownership split confirmed.

research_value:
Planned public-private structure: State majority ownership with private minority co-owner(s); no final project company ownership split confirmed.

citation_url:
https://www.kefm.dk/aktuelt/nyheder/2021/sep/politisk-aftale-bringer-energioeen-i-nordsoeen-taettere-paa-realisering

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on: DEA background page summarising decisions through 2023, plus Energinet 2024 reporting. The 02/09/2021 political agreement and DEA tender page specify state at least 50.1% / private owner 49.9%, but this remains a planned future structure, not an executed current ownership partnership. Earlier Ørsted/ATP consortium activity was bid positioning only, not confirmed ownership.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.kefm.dk/aktuelt/nyheder/2021/sep/politisk-aftale-bringer-energioeen-i-nordsoeen-taettere-paa-realisering


wind_farm_id: 6394
canonical_id: 7534f036-c35c-40e7-b389-7ab276456058
wind_farm_name: Energiø Nordsøen
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Concept
resolved_value: Concept
research_value: Concept
resolved_fact_id: 40560.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/miljoevurderinger-energioe-nordsoe
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – Miljøvurderinger Energiø Nordsø
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/miljoevurderinger-energioe-nordsoe
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Closest exact Boundary Layer status is Concept. Official DEA material says the government decided on 28/06/2023 to postpone the tender and pause plan/environmental-assessment work while alternative models were analysed. Later Energinet material says the North Sea Energy Island remains under political and technical discussion.


wind_farm_id: 6394
canonical_id: 7534f036-c35c-40e7-b389-7ab276456058
wind_farm_name: Energiø Nordsøen
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 3,000 MW initial phase; 10,000 MW long-term target
resolved_value: 3,000 MW initial phase; 10,000 MW long-term target
research_value: 3,000 MW initial phase; 10,000 MW long-term target
resolved_fact_id: 40561.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/bagom-energioeerne
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – Bag om energiøerne
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/bagom-energioeerne
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Multiple official sources align that first phase is 3 GW and long-term target is 10 GW. Because the project is unbuilt, this is planned capacity, not installed capacity.


wind_farm_id: 6394
canonical_id: 7534f036-c35c-40e7-b389-7ab276456058
wind_farm_name: Energiø Nordsøen
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/bagom-energioeerne
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – Bag om energiøerne
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/bagom-energioeerne
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Accessible official sources confirm planned wind capacity but do not clearly state a separate project-specific MEC distinct from planned generation / hub capacity. Because the concept includes interconnectors and transmission infrastructure still under redesign, a separate MEC could not be confirmed from open authoritative sources.


wind_farm_id: 6394
canonical_id: 7534f036-c35c-40e7-b389-7ab276456058
wind_farm_name: Energiø Nordsøen
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/miljoevurderinger-energioe-nordsoe
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – Miljøvurderinger Energiø Nordsø
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/miljoevurderinger-energioe-nordsoe
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific turbine model is confirmed in accessible official or developer/regulator sources. No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided in the prompt, so required fallback does not apply.


wind_farm_id: 6394
canonical_id: 7534f036-c35c-40e7-b389-7ab276456058
wind_farm_name: Energiø Nordsøen
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/miljoevurderinger-energioe-nordsoe
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – Miljøvurderinger Energiø Nordsø
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/miljoevurderinger-energioe-nordsoe
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific OEM has been confirmed; the project has not selected turbines in accessible authoritative sources.


wind_farm_id: 6394
canonical_id: 7534f036-c35c-40e7-b389-7ab276456058
wind_farm_name: Energiø Nordsøen
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/miljoevurderinger-energioe-nordsoe
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – Miljøvurderinger Energiø Nordsø
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/miljoevurderinger-energioe-nordsoe
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific turbine rating confirmed, and no linked EuroWindWakes fallback exists in the prompt.


wind_farm_id: 6394
canonical_id: 7534f036-c35c-40e7-b389-7ab276456058
wind_farm_name: Energiø Nordsøen
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/miljoevurderinger-energioe-nordsoe
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – Miljøvurderinger Energiø Nordsø
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/miljoevurderinger-energioe-nordsoe
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific rotor diameter confirmed, and it would be improper to infer from generic turbine platforms or other sites.


wind_farm_id: 6394
canonical_id: 7534f036-c35c-40e7-b389-7ab276456058
wind_farm_name: Energiø Nordsøen
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/miljoevurderinger-energioe-nordsoe
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – Miljøvurderinger Energiø Nordsø
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/miljoevurderinger-energioe-nordsoe
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific hub height confirmed, and no linked EuroWindWakes row is available to use as fallback.


wind_farm_id: 6394
canonical_id: 7534f036-c35c-40e7-b389-7ab276456058
wind_farm_name: Energiø Nordsøen
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: 0
resolved_fact_id: 40562.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.kefm.dk/aktuelt/nyheder/2023/jun/nye-modeller-for-energioe-nordsoeen-skal-analyseres-
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: KEFM – Nye modeller for Energiø Nordsøen skal analyseres
source_of_record_url: https://www.kefm.dk/aktuelt/nyheder/2023/jun/nye-modeller-for-energioe-nordsoeen-skal-analyseres-
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No turbines are installed and no turbine procurement is confirmed. This aligns with the non-web validation signal of 0 from the database context; likely reason is that Energiø Nordsøen remains conceptual and surrounding wind-farm packages have not been built.


wind_farm_id: 6394
canonical_id: 7534f036-c35c-40e7-b389-7ab276456058
wind_farm_name: Energiø Nordsøen
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Fixed-bottom expected; gravity-base or jacket with piles or suction buckets
resolved_value: Fixed-bottom expected; gravity-base or jacket with piles or suction buckets
research_value: Fixed-bottom expected; gravity-base or jacket with piles or suction buckets
resolved_fact_id: 40620.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/6852/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – ENERGIØ NORDSØEN
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/6852/download
source_of_record_licence: public sector information terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
A currently accessible official Danish Energy Agency source for Energiø Nordsøen states the surrounding offshore wind turbines are expected to be established as fixed-bottom turbines at the water depths considered, with foundation concepts including gravity foundations or jacket foundations with either piles or suction buckets. As the project is still conceptual, this is an expected/planned foundation configuration rather than a final awarded design.


wind_farm_id: 6394
canonical_id: 7534f036-c35c-40e7-b389-7ab276456058
wind_farm_name: Energiø Nordsøen
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/miljoevurderinger-energioe-nordsoe
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – Miljøvurderinger Energiø Nordsø
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/miljoevurderinger-energioe-nordsoe
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project consent date could be confirmed. Planning and environmental-assessment work was paused after the political decision of 28/06/2023.


wind_farm_id: 6394
canonical_id: 7534f036-c35c-40e7-b389-7ab276456058
wind_farm_name: Energiø Nordsøen
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.kefm.dk/aktuelt/nyheder/2023/jun/nye-modeller-for-energioe-nordsoeen-skal-analyseres-
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: KEFM – Nye modeller for Energiø Nordsøen skal analyseres
source_of_record_url: https://www.kefm.dk/aktuelt/nyheder/2023/jun/nye-modeller-for-energioe-nordsoeen-skal-analyseres-
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No first-power date is confirmed because the project remains conceptual and unconsented. Targets such as 2033 are planning ambitions, not achieved milestones.


wind_farm_id: 6394
canonical_id: 7534f036-c35c-40e7-b389-7ab276456058
wind_farm_name: Energiø Nordsøen
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/presse/offentlig-idehoering-af-danmarks-energioe-i-nordsoeen-skydes-i-gang
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – Offentlig idéhøring af Danmarks energiø i Nordsøen skydes i gang
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/presse/offentlig-idehoering-af-danmarks-energioe-i-nordsoeen-skydes-i-gang
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No full commissioning date is confirmed. Official Danish Energy Agency sources only state a planning target for total North Sea build-out of minimum 10 GW by 2040, which is not the same as a confirmed commissioning date for this project.


wind_farm_id: 6396
canonical_id: 48c23390-73e9-4ceb-8731-417400899f9a
wind_farm_name: Hesselø
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Hesselø Offshore Wind Farm (Danish: Hesselø Havvindmøllepark)
research_value: Hesselø Offshore Wind Farm (Danish: Hesselø Havvindmøllepark)
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/hesseloe-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency Danish project page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/hesseloe-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Danish Energy Agency pages use the Danish project title Hesselø Havvindmøllepark and the English title Hesselø Offshore Wind Farm (OWF) for the same tendered project. The project area was moved south from the original Hesselø area in 2022, but the project name remained Hesselø.


wind_farm_id: 6396
canonical_id: 48c23390-73e9-4ceb-8731-417400899f9a
wind_farm_name: Hesselø
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 40563.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/hesseloe-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency Danish project page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/hesseloe-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: to be selected via state tender; Current owner(s): Not confirmed; Equity partners and ownership percentages: Not confirmed; Operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: to be selected via state tender; Current owner(s): Not confirmed; Equity partners and ownership percentages: Not confirmed; Operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
This is still a state-tendered development area, not an awarded privately owned project. Freshest ownership/developer source date relied on: the Danish Energy Agency project page updated 18/11/2025 states DEA is tendering Hesselø; the 20/11/2025 DEA tender opening confirms the project is open for bids, so no current private owner/operator can yet be confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6396
canonical_id: 48c23390-73e9-4ceb-8731-417400899f9a
wind_farm_name: Hesselø
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency Hesselø news page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
State-led development area under Danish Energy Agency / Energinet preparatory process; no concession winner confirmed

research_value:
State-led development area under Danish Energy Agency / Energinet preparatory process; no concession winner confirmed

citation_url:
https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/ongoing-offshore-wind-tenders/hesselo-offshore-wind-farm/news-about-hesselo-owf

research_summary:
Ownership history is effectively pre-award only: DEA/Energinet progressed plan, environmental work and tender preparation; no concession award was found. Freshest source date relied on: DEA project page updated 18/11/2025 and DEA tender opening 20/11/2025.

source_of_record_url:
https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/ongoing-offshore-wind-tenders/hesselo-offshore-wind-farm/news-about-hesselo-owf


wind_farm_id: 6396
canonical_id: 48c23390-73e9-4ceb-8731-417400899f9a
wind_farm_name: Hesselø
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Development Zone / lease area
resolved_value: Development Zone / lease area
research_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_fact_id: 40640.0
resolved_source_type: community
resolved_source_name: Community approved
resolved_source_detail: approved community correction #8
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Community approved
research_source_name: Danish Energy Agency Hesselø news page
research_source_type: government
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: community
community_approved_note_count: 1
community_correction_count: 1
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 1
community_supports_resolved_value: 1
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project has an approved plan/SEA framework from 19/07/2024, but that approval “alone does not allow the construction of facilities”; the concession is still being tendered and the winner must later prepare the project-specific EIA. This is beyond pure concept/lease stage but not yet consented for construction, so the closest Boundary Layer label is In Planning / Consent Application Submitted.

research_source_url:
https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/ongoing-offshore-wind-tenders/hesselo-offshore-wind-farm/news-about-hesselo-owf


wind_farm_id: 6396
canonical_id: 48c23390-73e9-4ceb-8731-417400899f9a
wind_farm_name: Hesselø
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 800–1,200 MW planned
resolved_value: 800–1,200 MW planned
research_value: 800–1,200 MW planned
resolved_fact_id: 40565.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/hesseloe-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency Danish project page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/hesseloe-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Multiple DEA sources state Hesselø is being tendered with flexible installed capacity. The latest live project page says 0.8–1.2 GW; earlier SEA and July 2024 plan approval also state 800–1,200 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6396
canonical_id: 48c23390-73e9-4ceb-8731-417400899f9a
wind_farm_name: Hesselø
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/hesseloe-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency Danish project page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/hesseloe-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project capacity range is well evidenced, but I did not find an authoritative page explicitly giving a separate MEC/export-capacity figure for Hesselø. Some older background material discusses grid delivery assumptions, but not a clearly current project MEC value suitable for this table.


wind_farm_id: 6396
canonical_id: 48c23390-73e9-4ceb-8731-417400899f9a
wind_farm_name: Hesselø
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/hesseloe-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency Danish project page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/hesseloe-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No concession winner has been selected and the current Danish Energy Agency project page states that the tender winner will begin design of the concrete offshore wind project after award and contract signing. No project-specific turbine model is named in the live DEA project material.


wind_farm_id: 6396
canonical_id: 48c23390-73e9-4ceb-8731-417400899f9a
wind_farm_name: Hesselø
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/hesseloe-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency Danish project page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/hesseloe-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific turbine OEM is confirmed pre-award. Current DEA material describes the project as a tender area whose winner will subsequently project-design the concrete wind farm and prepare the project EIA.


wind_farm_id: 6396
canonical_id: 48c23390-73e9-4ceb-8731-417400899f9a
wind_farm_name: Hesselø
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/hesseloe-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency Danish project page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/hesseloe-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No awarded developer/project design was found. DEA documents leave the concrete turbine selection to the future tender winner, so no project-specific individual turbine rating can yet be confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6396
canonical_id: 48c23390-73e9-4ceb-8731-417400899f9a
wind_farm_name: Hesselø
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/hesseloe-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency Danish project page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/hesseloe-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific turbine has been selected and no authoritative project source names a rotor diameter. The current DEA project page indicates the future tender winner will design the concrete project after award.


wind_farm_id: 6396
canonical_id: 48c23390-73e9-4ceb-8731-417400899f9a
wind_farm_name: Hesselø
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/hesseloe-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency Danish project page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/hesseloe-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Hub height is not confirmed in current project-specific sources, and the prompt forbids inferring from generic turbine platforms or other sites. DEA material does not provide a project-specific hub height.


wind_farm_id: 6396
canonical_id: 48c23390-73e9-4ceb-8731-417400899f9a
wind_farm_name: Hesselø
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 8532.0
resolved_source_type: emodnet
resolved_source_name: EMODnet Human Activities
resolved_source_detail: EMODnet Jan 2026
citation_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMODnet Human Activities
source_of_record_type: public data portal
source_of_record_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
source_of_record_licence: Free and open public portal
research_source_name: Danish Energy Agency Danish project page
research_source_type: government
research_source_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/hesseloe-havvindmoellepark
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
DEA planning material confirms only a project capacity range and states that the tender winner will later project-design the concrete offshore wind farm. No authoritative current source confirms a final turbine count.


wind_farm_id: 6396
canonical_id: 48c23390-73e9-4ceb-8731-417400899f9a
wind_farm_name: Hesselø
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/new-agreement-alternative-location-hesselo-offshore-wind-farm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA alternative location press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/new-agreement-alternative-location-hesselo-offshore-wind-farm
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The site was moved because preliminary studies showed soft seabed in the original area, but no authoritative source found here confirms the final project foundation type for the tendered southern area.


wind_farm_id: 6396
canonical_id: 48c23390-73e9-4ceb-8731-417400899f9a
wind_farm_name: Hesselø
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 19/07/2024
resolved_value: 19/07/2024
research_value: 19/07/2024
resolved_fact_id: 40566.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-vedtager-plan-hesseloe-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA press release 19/07/2024
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-vedtager-plan-hesseloe-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The Danish Energy Agency approved the plan for Hesselø OWF on 19/07/2024. This is a plan/SEA approval rather than a full construction consent, but it is the clearest dated regulatory milestone currently evidenced.


wind_farm_id: 6396
canonical_id: 48c23390-73e9-4ceb-8731-417400899f9a
wind_farm_name: Hesselø
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/danish-energy-agency-opens-tenders-three-new-danish-offshore-wind-farms
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA tender opening press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/danish-energy-agency-opens-tenders-three-new-danish-offshore-wind-farms
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No awarded concessionaire or privately sponsored project company was identified, so no FID is possible to confirm at this stage.


wind_farm_id: 6396
canonical_id: 48c23390-73e9-4ceb-8731-417400899f9a
wind_farm_name: Hesselø
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/hesseloe-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency Danish project page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/hesseloe-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No first power date is available because the project is still in tender/planning. Older timelines for 2027 were superseded; the current live schedule is only for possible final commissioning by end-2032.


wind_farm_id: 6396
canonical_id: 48c23390-73e9-4ceb-8731-417400899f9a
wind_farm_name: Hesselø
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 31/12/2032
resolved_value: 31/12/2032
research_value: 31/12/2032
resolved_fact_id: 40567.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/danish-energy-agency-opens-tenders-three-new-danish-offshore-wind-farms
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA tender opening press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/danish-energy-agency-opens-tenders-three-new-danish-offshore-wind-farms
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The freshest DEA tender sources say Hesselø must be completed by the end of 2032. This is a planned completion deadline, not an achieved commissioning date.


wind_farm_id: 6397
canonical_id: 34445399-8d05-4396-87d0-06e55d6d670c
wind_farm_name: Mermaid
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Mermaid offshore wind farm; built as the Mermaid concession within SeaMade
research_value: Mermaid offshore wind farm; built as the Mermaid concession within SeaMade
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa SeaMade order release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/press-releases/contract-offshore-belgium-seamade-8mw-turbines.html

research_summary:
Project-specific sources agree that Mermaid is one of the two SeaMade concession zones, formerly a standalone project and later combined with Seastar under the SeaMade name.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/press-releases/contract-offshore-belgium-seamade-8mw-turbines.html


wind_farm_id: 6397
canonical_id: 34445399-8d05-4396-87d0-06e55d6d670c
wind_farm_name: Mermaid
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 36015.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa SeaMade order release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: SeaMade NV / Otary-led partnership. Current owners of SeaMade partnership: Otary RS NV 70%, ENGIE Electrabel NV 17.5%, Eneco Wind Belgium SA 12.5%. Operator: Otary / SeaMade management (operator not separately and freshly percentage-listed on a newer operator page for Mermaid-only scope)

resolved_value:
Developer: SeaMade NV / Otary-led partnership. Current owners of SeaMade partnership: Otary RS NV 70%, ENGIE Electrabel NV 17.5%, Eneco Wind Belgium SA 12.5%. Operator: Otary / SeaMade management (operator not separately and freshly percentage-listed on a newer operator page for Mermaid-only scope)

citation_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/press-releases/contract-offshore-belgium-seamade-8mw-turbines.html

research_summary:
Freshest dated ownership source relied on is 12/09/2024 Elia confirming Mermaid remains one of the operational MOG-connected wind farms; ownership split itself is confirmed by accessible official project-owner pages from Eneco and Siemens Gamesa stating the SeaMade partnership percentages. Mermaid is a concession inside SeaMade, so current ownership is evidenced at SeaMade level rather than on a separate Mermaid-only owner page.


wind_farm_id: 6397
canonical_id: 34445399-8d05-4396-87d0-06e55d6d670c
wind_farm_name: Mermaid
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eneco financial close release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Originally developed as THV Mermaid / standalone Mermaid project; later merged with Seastar into SeaMade. Current reconciled ownership of the combined built project: Otary RS NV 70%, ENGIE Electrabel NV 17.5%, Eneco Wind Belgium SA 12.5%

research_value:
Originally developed as THV Mermaid / standalone Mermaid project; later merged with Seastar into SeaMade. Current reconciled ownership of the combined built project: Otary RS NV 70%, ENGIE Electrabel NV 17.5%, Eneco Wind Belgium SA 12.5%

citation_url:
https://news.eneco.be/seamade-reaches-financial-close-for-its-487-mw-offshore-wind-farm-in-the-belgian-north-sea

research_summary:
Freshest dated source relied on for current operational context is 12/09/2024 Elia. Historical merger/restructuring is supported by SeaMade/Siemens/Eneco pages stating SeaMade combines the formerly separate Mermaid and Seastar projects. The current percentages reconcile to 100% and are stated on official pages; no newer official source found indicating a changed split.

source_of_record_url:
https://news.eneco.be/seamade-reaches-financial-close-for-its-487-mw-offshore-wind-farm-in-the-belgian-north-sea


wind_farm_id: 6397
canonical_id: 34445399-8d05-4396-87d0-06e55d6d670c
wind_farm_name: Mermaid
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 36016.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.otary.be/en/projects/seamade
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Otary SeaMade project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.otary.be/en/projects/seamade
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Mermaid is part of SeaMade, which official owner pages say has been fully operational since end-2020. Elia’s 12/09/2024 MOG update still lists Mermaid as an operating wind farm connected to the offshore grid.


wind_farm_id: 6397
canonical_id: 34445399-8d05-4396-87d0-06e55d6d670c
wind_farm_name: Mermaid
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 235.2 MW
resolved_value: 235.2 MW
research_value: 235.2 MW
resolved_fact_id: 36017.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset / project context
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Siemens Gamesa’s project-specific contract release explicitly gives Mermaid as 28 x 8.0 MW = 235 MW-class, and the project context/database value of 235.2 MW is consistent with 28 turbines at 8.4? No: here the project-specific official source states 28 SG 8.0-167 units, which mathematically yields 224 MW, yet the same release explicitly labels Mermaid 235 MW. Given this project-specific official wording and the database cross-check of 235.2 MW, the most likely correct installed capacity is 235.2 MW, reflecting the concession’s official capacity figure rather than a simple turbine-count multiplication.


wind_farm_id: 6397
canonical_id: 34445399-8d05-4396-87d0-06e55d6d670c
wind_farm_name: Mermaid
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eneco financial close release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://news.eneco.be/seamade-reaches-financial-close-for-its-487-mw-offshore-wind-farm-in-the-belgian-north-sea

research_summary:
Accessible project-owner and lender sources confirm that Mermaid/Seastar connect to Elia’s Modular Offshore Grid via offshore substations and export cables, but I did not find a Mermaid-specific MEC value stated as a standalone figure on an openly accessible source. I therefore leave MEC as Not confirmed rather than relabelling shared-grid information as a project MEC.


wind_farm_id: 6397
canonical_id: 34445399-8d05-4396-87d0-06e55d6d670c
wind_farm_name: Mermaid
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: SG 8.0-167 DD
resolved_value: SG 8.0-167 DD
research_value: SG 8.0-167 DD
resolved_fact_id: 36018.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa SeaMade order release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific official source ties this exact model to SeaMade and states Mermaid specifically has 28 SG 8.0-167 turbines.


wind_farm_id: 6397
canonical_id: 34445399-8d05-4396-87d0-06e55d6d670c
wind_farm_name: Mermaid
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens Gamesa
resolved_value: Siemens Gamesa
research_value: Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy
resolved_fact_id: 9016.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Siemens Gamesa SeaMade order release
research_source_type: OEM press release
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Official project sources identify SGRE / Siemens Gamesa as turbine supplier for SeaMade, including Mermaid.


wind_farm_id: 6397
canonical_id: 34445399-8d05-4396-87d0-06e55d6d670c
wind_farm_name: Mermaid
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 8
resolved_value: 8
research_value: 8 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9326.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Siemens Gamesa SeaMade order release
research_source_type: OEM press release
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific official Siemens Gamesa release states 58 units of the SG 8.0-167 DD; Mermaid has 28 of those turbines.


wind_farm_id: 6397
canonical_id: 34445399-8d05-4396-87d0-06e55d6d670c
wind_farm_name: Mermaid
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 167
resolved_value: 167
research_value: 167 m
resolved_fact_id: 9481.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Eneco SeaMade page
research_source_type: owner project page
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Official project sources explicitly tie the 167 m rotor to SeaMade turbines; this applies to Mermaid as one SeaMade concession.

research_source_url:
https://www.eneco.nl/en/about-us/what-we-do/sustainable-resources/wind/wind-offshore/seamade-wind-farm/


wind_farm_id: 6397
canonical_id: 34445399-8d05-4396-87d0-06e55d6d670c
wind_farm_name: Mermaid
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 109
resolved_value: 109
research_value: 109 m
resolved_fact_id: 9636.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Eneco financial close release
research_source_type: owner press release
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web evidence is available: Eneco’s financial close release states SeaMade turbines have a hub height of 109 meters. This matches the linked EuroWindWakes fallback, so no generic turbine-page inference was needed.


wind_farm_id: 6397
canonical_id: 34445399-8d05-4396-87d0-06e55d6d670c
wind_farm_name: Mermaid
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 28
resolved_value: 28
research_value: 28
resolved_fact_id: 48156.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 28 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Siemens Gamesa SeaMade order release
research_source_type: OEM press release
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Siemens Gamesa explicitly states Mermaid has 28 SG 8.0-167 turbines. This aligns with the non-web validation signals supplied in context: EuroWindWakes linked-turbine count 28 and EMODnet hint 28.


wind_farm_id: 6397
canonical_id: 34445399-8d05-4396-87d0-06e55d6d670c
wind_farm_name: Mermaid
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile
resolved_value: Monopile
research_value: Monopile
resolved_fact_id: 36024.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa SeaMade order release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Siemens Gamesa’s project-specific release explicitly states Mermaid turbines “will also be installed on monopiles.”


wind_farm_id: 6397
canonical_id: 34445399-8d05-4396-87d0-06e55d6d670c
wind_farm_name: Mermaid
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eib.org/en/projects/all/20170917
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EIB SeaMade project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.eib.org/en/projects/all/20170917
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Accessible official project-finance sources confirm SeaMade was fully consented before financing and construction, but I did not find a verifier-safe openly accessible Mermaid-only consent date after the prior federal annex PDF stopped verifying reliably. To avoid keeping a day-level date on an unstable source, this is left Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6397
canonical_id: 34445399-8d05-4396-87d0-06e55d6d670c
wind_farm_name: Mermaid
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 03/12/2018
resolved_value: 03/12/2018
research_value: 03/12/2018
resolved_fact_id: 36026.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eneco financial close release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official SeaMade financial close announcement dated 03/12/2018 is the strongest accessible proxy for FID and indicates construction would start in summer 2019.


wind_farm_id: 6397
canonical_id: 34445399-8d05-4396-87d0-06e55d6d670c
wind_farm_name: Mermaid
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/05/2020
resolved_value: 01/05/2020
research_value: 01/05/2020
resolved_fact_id: 36027.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Windtech report on export cable energisation
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://windtech-international.com/projects-and-contracts/seamade-announces-export-cables-energisation-of-seastar-and-mermaid-offshore-wind-farms

research_summary:
Project-specific evidence indicates the export cables for Seastar and Mermaid were energised in May 2020 and Elia stated Mermaid and the other MOG-connected farms were “starting up one by one” by 29/05/2020. Day-level first export for Mermaid alone was not found, so month-level evidence is normalized to 01/05/2020.

source_of_record_url:
https://windtech-international.com/projects-and-contracts/seamade-announces-export-cables-energisation-of-seastar-and-mermaid-offshore-wind-farms


wind_farm_id: 6397
canonical_id: 34445399-8d05-4396-87d0-06e55d6d670c
wind_farm_name: Mermaid
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2020-12-01
resolved_value: 2020-12-01
research_value: 01/12/2020
resolved_fact_id: 9791.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Official owner pages state SeaMade has been fully operational since the end of 2020; project databases and linked dataset context also point to December 2020 commissioning. With month-level confirmation, normalized date is 01/12/2020.


wind_farm_id: 6398
canonical_id: 414b4af6-7c63-49e1-ba9a-25dd3be0f1de
wind_farm_name: Morven
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.morvenoffshorewind.com/morven-offshore-wind-farm/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Morven Offshore Wind Farm Array Project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.morvenoffshorewind.com/morven-offshore-wind-farm/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Morven Offshore Wind Farm; later defined as Morven North Offshore Wind Array Project and Morven South Offshore Wind Array Project

research_value:
Morven Offshore Wind Farm; later defined as Morven North Offshore Wind Array Project and Morven South Offshore Wind Array Project

research_summary:
Official project materials show the project was awarded as Morven in ScotWind and has since been split for development purposes into Morven North and Morven South. EnBW’s 2022 award notice names the project “Morven”; the project website and 2025 brochure explain the later subdivision.


wind_farm_id: 6398
canonical_id: 414b4af6-7c63-49e1-ba9a-25dd3be0f1de
wind_farm_name: Morven
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 33864.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.morvenoffshorewind.com/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Morven Offshore Wind Farm home page
source_of_record_url: https://www.morvenoffshorewind.com/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Morven Offshore Wind Limited; current project developers/owners presented publicly as EnBW and JERA Nex bp

resolved_value:
Developer: Morven Offshore Wind Limited; current project developers/owners presented publicly as EnBW and JERA Nex bp

research_summary:
The official Morven website says Morven Offshore Wind Limited is a JV between EnBW and JERA Nex bp. Freshness nuance: the Morven site as crawled in 2026 and JERA Nex bp’s project page are the freshest public-facing ownership/developer pages relied on; Scottish Government FOI background issued in 2025 still described the project as a 50/50 bp/EnBW JV before/around the bp-JERA offshore wind combination, so the branding/holding structure has evolved.


wind_farm_id: 6398
canonical_id: 414b4af6-7c63-49e1-ba9a-25dd3be0f1de
wind_farm_name: Morven
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: 2022 award to bp and EnBW JV; current public project branding shows EnBW and JERA Nex bp
research_value: 2022 award to bp and EnBW JV; current public project branding shows EnBW and JERA Nex bp
citation_url: https://www.enbw.com/press/enbw-and-bp-scot-auction-site-allocation-for-offshore-wind-farm.html
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EnBW ScotWind award release
source_of_record_url: https://www.enbw.com/press/enbw-and-bp-scot-auction-site-allocation-for-offshore-wind-farm.html
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
EnBW’s 2022 release says bp and EnBW were awarded the lease option for Morven. Newer official Morven/JERA Nex bp pages show the project now being presented as jointly developed by EnBW and JERA Nex bp. Freshest dated source relied on for current presentation is the Morven project website content available in 2025/2026; the 2025 Scottish Government FOI note also records that in December 2024 bp and JERA agreed to combine offshore wind businesses, which helps explain the naming shift. Exact reconciled project equity percentages under the new branding were not confirmed on an explicit project-specific official page.


wind_farm_id: 6398
canonical_id: 414b4af6-7c63-49e1-ba9a-25dd3be0f1de
wind_farm_name: Morven
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
resolved_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
research_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
resolved_fact_id: 33865.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Scottish Government FOI background PDF
source_of_record_licence: public sector webpage/PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.gov.scot/binaries/content/documents/govscot/publications/foi-eir-release/2025/12/foi-202500482260/documents/eir-202500482260---information-released---documents/eir-202500482260---information-released---documents/govscot%3Adocument/EIR%2B202500482260%2B-%2BInformation%2Breleased%2B-%2BDocuments.pdf

research_summary:
Morven has advanced beyond lease award into scoping and pre-application work, but the project is still clearly pre-application / pre-consent. The closest exact Boundary Layer label is therefore Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning, because none of the allowed labels capture “active pre-application scoping but no submitted consent application for the full array yet” perfectly. Scottish Government FOI background says Morven was “currently at the pre-application stage”, and the project website shows array scoping materials and grid-connection consultation rather than a granted consent.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.gov.scot/binaries/content/documents/govscot/publications/foi-eir-release/2025/12/foi-202500482260/documents/eir-202500482260---information-released---documents/eir-202500482260---information-released---documents/govscot%3Adocument/EIR%2B202500482260%2B-%2BInformation%2Breleased%2B-%2BDocuments.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6398
canonical_id: 414b4af6-7c63-49e1-ba9a-25dd3be0f1de
wind_farm_name: Morven
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2907 MW
resolved_value: 2907 MW
research_value: 2907 MW
resolved_fact_id: 33866.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.enbw.com/press/enbw-and-bp-scot-auction-site-allocation-for-offshore-wind-farm.html
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EnBW ScotWind award release
source_of_record_url: https://www.enbw.com/press/enbw-and-bp-scot-auction-site-allocation-for-offshore-wind-farm.html
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Capacity is consistently presented as about 2.9 GW / 3 GW. The database context value 2907 MW aligns with authoritative public sources rounding to 2.9 GW and project pages rounding to 3 GW.


wind_farm_id: 6398
canonical_id: 414b4af6-7c63-49e1-ba9a-25dd3be0f1de
wind_farm_name: Morven
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.morvenoffshorewind.com/morven-hawthorn-pit-grid-connection/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Morven Hawthorn Pit grid connection page
source_of_record_url: https://www.morvenoffshorewind.com/morven-hawthorn-pit-grid-connection/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Publicly accessible project pages confirm overall generation potential and grid-connection locations, but I did not find an openly accessible authoritative source that explicitly states a project MEC in MW. The Hawthorn Pit material indicates one connection serving either Morven North or Morven South and notes a second connection will also be required, but it does not provide a clearly stated total MEC figure.


wind_farm_id: 6398
canonical_id: 414b4af6-7c63-49e1-ba9a-25dd3be0f1de
wind_farm_name: Morven
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Morven array scoping report PDF
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.morvenoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/230728_-_230717_-_morven_-_scop-0028_-_scoping_-_scoping_submission_scoping_report_-_developer_to_md-lot_redacted.pdf

research_summary:
No project-specific authoritative source reviewed explicitly names a selected turbine model for Morven. The project remains pre-application / pre-consent and turbine choice appears unfinalised. Per instruction, no inference is made from generic OEM platforms.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.morvenoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/230728_-_230717_-_morven_-_scop-0028_-_scoping_-_scoping_submission_scoping_report_-_developer_to_md-lot_redacted.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6398
canonical_id: 414b4af6-7c63-49e1-ba9a-25dd3be0f1de
wind_farm_name: Morven
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Morven array scoping report PDF
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.morvenoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/230728_-_230717_-_morven_-_scop-0028_-_scoping_-_scoping_submission_scoping_report_-_developer_to_md-lot_redacted.pdf

research_summary:
No project-specific authoritative source reviewed explicitly confirms an OEM for Morven. The scoping-stage documents describe turbines generically only.


wind_farm_id: 6398
canonical_id: 414b4af6-7c63-49e1-ba9a-25dd3be0f1de
wind_farm_name: Morven
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Morven array scoping report PDF
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific web source reviewed explicitly states the selected turbine rating for Morven. No linked EuroWindWakes turbine fallback was provided in the prompt, so this remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6398
canonical_id: 414b4af6-7c63-49e1-ba9a-25dd3be0f1de
wind_farm_name: Morven
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Morven array scoping report PDF
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific authoritative source reviewed explicitly confirms hub height for Morven. Per instruction, this is not inferred from turbine model families used elsewhere.


wind_farm_id: 6398
canonical_id: 414b4af6-7c63-49e1-ba9a-25dd3be0f1de
wind_farm_name: Morven
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 191
resolved_value: 191
research_value: 191
resolved_fact_id: 33867.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Morven infrastructure in Scottish waters brochure
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.morvenoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Infrastructure-in-Scottish-waters-public-information-day-brochure-2.pdf

research_summary:
The clearest recent project-specific figure comes from current official Morven materials: the Scottish-waters public information brochure states “up to 96 turbines” for Morven North and “up to 95 turbines” for Morven South, implying up to 191 turbines in total. A 2025 Scottish Government FOI background note instead says “approx 160 wind turbines”; that likely reflects an earlier high-level estimate. This web-sourced figure differs from the non-web validation signal of 0, which appears to reflect the project’s unbuilt status rather than a design-envelope turbine count.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.morvenoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Infrastructure-in-Scottish-waters-public-information-day-brochure-2.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6398
canonical_id: 414b4af6-7c63-49e1-ba9a-25dd3be0f1de
wind_farm_name: Morven
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Fixed-bottom foundations
resolved_value: Fixed-bottom foundations
research_value: Fixed-bottom foundations
resolved_fact_id: 33868.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.enbw.com/press/enbw-and-bp-scot-auction-site-allocation-for-offshore-wind-farm.html
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EnBW ScotWind award release
source_of_record_url: https://www.enbw.com/press/enbw-and-bp-scot-auction-site-allocation-for-offshore-wind-farm.html
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Morven is consistently described as a fixed-bottom / fixed-foundation offshore wind project. More specific installed foundation type is not yet confirmed because the project remains at an early stage and the design envelope allows flexibility.


wind_farm_id: 6398
canonical_id: 414b4af6-7c63-49e1-ba9a-25dd3be0f1de
wind_farm_name: Morven
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.jnbp.com/project/morven/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: JERA Nex bp Morven page
source_of_record_url: https://www.jnbp.com/project/morven/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No authoritative project-specific source reviewed indicates that FID has been taken. The project is still described as developing / pre-application.


wind_farm_id: 6398
canonical_id: 414b4af6-7c63-49e1-ba9a-25dd3be0f1de
wind_farm_name: Morven
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.jnbp.com/project/morven/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: JERA Nex bp Morven page
source_of_record_url: https://www.jnbp.com/project/morven/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No authoritative source reviewed indicates a commissioning date; the project has not reached construction.


wind_farm_id: 6404
canonical_id: 18ad07e5-b299-44c4-9cd7-826a5dcff94b
wind_farm_name: Krigers Flak Nord
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Kriegers Flak II (north sub-area historically: Kriegers Flak II North / Kriegers Flak Nord)
research_value: Kriegers Flak II (north sub-area historically: Kriegers Flak II North / Kriegers Flak Nord)
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency project page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The web evidence indicates that “Krigers Flak Nord” is not a standalone consented wind farm with its own identified developer; it is the northern part of the broader Kriegers Flak II tender/planning area in Denmark. DEA pages and procurement documents use the official project name Kriegers Flak II; Energinet’s survey tender explicitly splits it into Kriegers Flak II North and Kriegers Flak II South.


wind_farm_id: 6404
canonical_id: 18ad07e5-b299-44c4-9cd7-826a5dcff94b
wind_farm_name: Krigers Flak Nord
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 40577.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency project page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Not confirmed; Current owner(s): Danish state planning/tender area, no project owner selected; Equity partners: Not confirmed; Operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: Not confirmed; Current owner(s): Danish state planning/tender area, no project owner selected; Equity partners: Not confirmed; Operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on: 19/05/2025 from the DEA project page. DEA says it is planning an offshore wind farm in the Kriegers Flak II area and that the 22/04/2024 tender was cancelled on 31/01/2025; no concessionaire is named. The procurement documents describe future 20% state co-ownership, but that would apply only after award, which has not occurred.


wind_farm_id: 6404
canonical_id: 18ad07e5-b299-44c4-9cd7-826a5dcff94b
wind_farm_name: Krigers Flak Nord
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://eu.eu-supply.com/ctm/Supplier/PublicPurchase/399416/1/0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Kriegers Flak II public procurement page
source_of_record_url: https://eu.eu-supply.com/ctm/Supplier/PublicPurchase/399416/1/0
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
No project company or awarded ownership confirmed; tender envisaged 20% state co-ownership after award, but tender was cancelled before award

research_value:
No project company or awarded ownership confirmed; tender envisaged 20% state co-ownership after award, but tender was cancelled before award

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on: 19/05/2025 from DEA. The project remains in state-led planning only. The procurement material said the concessionaire would hold the project in co-ownership with State Holding and the broader 6 GW framework described 20% state co-ownership, but because the Kriegers Flak II tender was cancelled on 31/01/2025, no ownership split was crystallised.


wind_farm_id: 6404
canonical_id: 18ad07e5-b299-44c4-9cd7-826a5dcff94b
wind_farm_name: Krigers Flak Nord
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
research_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_fact_id: 40578.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA SEA hearing notice
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://ens.dk/en/press/public-hearing-concerning-strategic-environmental-assessment-plan-offshore-wind-farms

research_summary:
Best fit Boundary Layer status is In Planning / Consent Application Submitted. It is beyond “Concept” because DEA has completed plan-level SEA work, adopted the plan, run tender preparation, and advanced onshore/offshore environmental work; but it is not consented and has no selected developer. For the specific north sub-area, evidence points to a planning/tender sub-area within Kriegers Flak II rather than a standalone project.

source_of_record_url:
https://ens.dk/en/press/public-hearing-concerning-strategic-environmental-assessment-plan-offshore-wind-farms


wind_farm_id: 6404
canonical_id: 18ad07e5-b299-44c4-9cd7-826a5dcff94b
wind_farm_name: Krigers Flak Nord
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 40579.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/denmarks-largest-tendering-procedure-offshore-wind-power-launched
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA tender launch
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/denmarks-largest-tendering-procedure-offshore-wind-power-launched
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Minimum 1,000 MW for Kriegers Flak II as a whole; standalone “Krigers Flak Nord” capacity not confirmed

resolved_value:
Minimum 1,000 MW for Kriegers Flak II as a whole; standalone “Krigers Flak Nord” capacity not confirmed

research_summary:
Official sources consistently give minimum 1 GW for Kriegers Flak II overall, covering both north and south. A COWI/DEA screening document indicates an internal layout assumption of 510 MW for Kriegers Flak 2 North, but this appears to be planning-screening context rather than a project award or final capacity, so the standalone north value is treated as Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6404
canonical_id: 18ad07e5-b299-44c4-9cd7-826a5dcff94b
wind_farm_name: Krigers Flak Nord
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://eu.eu-supply.com/ctm/Supplier/PublicPurchase/399416/1/0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Kriegers Flak II public procurement page
source_of_record_url: https://eu.eu-supply.com/ctm/Supplier/PublicPurchase/399416/1/0
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible source reviewed gives a project-specific MEC for the north sub-area or for Kriegers Flak II as a whole. Official pages discuss minimum generation capacity and grid connection concepts, but not a confirmed MEC value.


wind_farm_id: 6404
canonical_id: 18ad07e5-b299-44c4-9cd7-826a5dcff94b
wind_farm_name: Krigers Flak Nord
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency project page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific web source reviewed confirms a turbine model for Kriegers Flak II North / “Krigers Flak Nord”. No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided in the prompt, so the required result is Not confirmed rather than inference from generic 15 MW assumptions used in environmental scenarios.


wind_farm_id: 6404
canonical_id: 18ad07e5-b299-44c4-9cd7-826a5dcff94b
wind_farm_name: Krigers Flak Nord
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency project page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific source confirms an OEM. Planning documents mention generic scenario assumptions only, which are insufficient for a site-specific turbine specification.


wind_farm_id: 6404
canonical_id: 18ad07e5-b299-44c4-9cd7-826a5dcff94b
wind_farm_name: Krigers Flak Nord
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/6392/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Scenario document
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/6392/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Some environmental/scenario documents assume 15 MW turbines for modelling, but this is not an awarded or confirmed site-specific turbine selection. Therefore individual rated power remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6404
canonical_id: 18ad07e5-b299-44c4-9cd7-826a5dcff94b
wind_farm_name: Krigers Flak Nord
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://eu.eu-supply.com/ctm/Supplier/PublicPurchase/399416/1/0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Kriegers Flak II public procurement page
source_of_record_url: https://eu.eu-supply.com/ctm/Supplier/PublicPurchase/399416/1/0
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible project-specific source explicitly ties a rotor diameter to Kriegers Flak II North / “Krigers Flak Nord”.


wind_farm_id: 6404
canonical_id: 18ad07e5-b299-44c4-9cd7-826a5dcff94b
wind_farm_name: Krigers Flak Nord
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://eu.eu-supply.com/ctm/Supplier/PublicPurchase/399416/1/0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Kriegers Flak II public procurement page
source_of_record_url: https://eu.eu-supply.com/ctm/Supplier/PublicPurchase/399416/1/0
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible project-specific source confirms hub height for this project/sub-area, and hub height must not be inferred from generic turbine platforms.


wind_farm_id: 6404
canonical_id: 18ad07e5-b299-44c4-9cd7-826a5dcff94b
wind_farm_name: Krigers Flak Nord
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 8548.0
resolved_source_type: emodnet
resolved_source_name: EMODnet Human Activities
resolved_source_detail: EMODnet Jan 2026
citation_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMODnet Human Activities
source_of_record_type: public data portal
source_of_record_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
source_of_record_licence: Free and open public portal
research_source_name: DEA adopted plan page
research_source_type: government
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
No confirmed turbine count is available for the standalone north sub-area. For Kriegers Flak II overall, official sources describe capacity-based planning rather than a fixed turbine count. This differs from the database validation signal of 0, which most likely reflects an unbuilt planning area rather than a literal final turbine count.


wind_farm_id: 6404
canonical_id: 18ad07e5-b299-44c4-9cd7-826a5dcff94b
wind_farm_name: Krigers Flak Nord
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://eu.eu-supply.com/ctm/Supplier/PublicPurchase/399416/1/0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Kriegers Flak II public procurement page
source_of_record_url: https://eu.eu-supply.com/ctm/Supplier/PublicPurchase/399416/1/0
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific foundation type has been confirmed in the accessible official material reviewed.


wind_farm_id: 6404
canonical_id: 18ad07e5-b299-44c4-9cd7-826a5dcff94b
wind_farm_name: Krigers Flak Nord
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA SEA hearing notice
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://ens.dk/en/press/public-hearing-concerning-strategic-environmental-assessment-plan-offshore-wind-farms

research_summary:
No project-specific construction consent/licence date was confirmed for the project or the north sub-area. DEA and EPA material show planning, SEA, and EIA-scoping activity, not a final construction consent.


wind_farm_id: 6404
canonical_id: 18ad07e5-b299-44c4-9cd7-826a5dcff94b
wind_farm_name: Krigers Flak Nord
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency project page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official sources previously stated an expectation that Kriegers Flak II could be fully operational by end-2030, but after the tender cancellation DEA says a new timetable has not yet been published. Therefore a commissioning date is Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6406
canonical_id: 07cfd334-276a-4cc0-9166-aa86ce78b64c
wind_farm_name: Kattegat II
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Kattegat II / Kattegat Havvindmøllepark
research_value: Kattegat II / Kattegat Havvindmøllepark
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kattegat-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency Kattegat project page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kattegat-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Danish Energy Agency materials use both “Kattegat II” and “Kattegat Havvindmøllepark” for the same planned offshore wind area. The English 2023 hearing notice refers to Kattegat II; the current DEA project page uses Kattegat Havvindmøllepark.


wind_farm_id: 6406
canonical_id: 07cfd334-276a-4cc0-9166-aa86ce78b64c
wind_farm_name: Kattegat II
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 40709.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://grenaahavn.dk/en/forretningsomraader/offshore-wind/kattegat-2-offshore-windfarm/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Port of Grenaa Kattegat II page
source_of_record_url: https://grenaahavn.dk/en/forretningsomraader/offshore-wind/kattegat-2-offshore-windfarm/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
No project-specific developer or owners appointed; Danish state tender managed by the Danish Energy Agency, with Energinet conducting preliminary studies/grid preparation

resolved_value:
No project-specific developer or owners appointed; Danish state tender managed by the Danish Energy Agency, with Energinet conducting preliminary studies/grid preparation

research_summary:
No concessionaire has been selected. The freshest source relied on is the DEA project page, which states on 31/01/2025 that the tender was cancelled and no new tender date had yet been published; Port of Grenaa and DEA tender pages confirm the eventual winner would build and operate the project, implying no current private owner yet.


wind_farm_id: 6406
canonical_id: 07cfd334-276a-4cc0-9166-aa86ce78b64c
wind_farm_name: Kattegat II
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kattegat-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency Kattegat project page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kattegat-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
No ownership transfers confirmed; remained a state-planned tender area without awarded private ownership

research_value:
No ownership transfers confirmed; remained a state-planned tender area without awarded private ownership

research_summary:
No evidence of any awarded concession, equity partnership, or ownership split was found. The freshest dated source used is the DEA page stating the 22/04/2024 tender was cancelled on 31/01/2025; therefore there is no ownership history beyond state planning.


wind_farm_id: 6406
canonical_id: 07cfd334-276a-4cc0-9166-aa86ce78b64c
wind_farm_name: Kattegat II
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Concept
resolved_value: Concept
research_value: Concept
resolved_fact_id: 40710.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kattegat-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency Kattegat project page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kattegat-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project has a defined plan area and had a tender, but the 31/01/2025 cancellation left it without an awarded concessionaire or project-specific EIA/construction path. Under the Boundary Layer taxonomy, Concept is the closest fit because no live awarded project entity is progressing construction.


wind_farm_id: 6406
canonical_id: 07cfd334-276a-4cc0-9166-aa86ce78b64c
wind_farm_name: Kattegat II
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Minimum 1,000 MW planned; environmental assessment envelope 1,000–2,460 MW
resolved_value: Minimum 1,000 MW planned; environmental assessment envelope 1,000–2,460 MW
research_value: Minimum 1,000 MW planned; environmental assessment envelope 1,000–2,460 MW
resolved_fact_id: 40711.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency hearing notice
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
DEA tender and planning sources consistently state minimum 1 GW for Kattegat. SEA material also states the assessed envelope corresponds to 1,000 and 2,460 MW, so 1,000 MW is the firm planned minimum rather than a fixed final installed capacity.


wind_farm_id: 6406
canonical_id: 07cfd334-276a-4cc0-9166-aa86ce78b64c
wind_farm_name: Kattegat II
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency hearing notice
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible source found an explicit Kattegat II MEC value. Sources confirm a minimum 1 GW project scale and overplanting possibility, but do not clearly separate export capacity from gross capacity for Kattegat II.


wind_farm_id: 6406
canonical_id: 07cfd334-276a-4cc0-9166-aa86ce78b64c
wind_farm_name: Kattegat II
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kattegat-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency Kattegat project page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kattegat-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No concessionaire has been awarded and no project-specific turbine selection was found. Per instruction, no turbine platform is inferred from generic market context.


wind_farm_id: 6406
canonical_id: 07cfd334-276a-4cc0-9166-aa86ce78b64c
wind_farm_name: Kattegat II
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kattegat-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency Kattegat project page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kattegat-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific OEM appointment was found, and there is no linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata in the prompt to use as fallback.


wind_farm_id: 6406
canonical_id: 07cfd334-276a-4cc0-9166-aa86ce78b64c
wind_farm_name: Kattegat II
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency hearing notice
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific turbine rating was confirmed. DEA planning sources discuss only total project capacity ranges and tender structure.


wind_farm_id: 6406
canonical_id: 07cfd334-276a-4cc0-9166-aa86ce78b64c
wind_farm_name: Kattegat II
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kattegat-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency Kattegat project page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kattegat-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific turbine specification was found, and no linked turbine dataset value was provided for fallback.


wind_farm_id: 6406
canonical_id: 07cfd334-276a-4cc0-9166-aa86ce78b64c
wind_farm_name: Kattegat II
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency hearing notice
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific hub height was found, and no linked EuroWindWakes row exists in the prompt. Per instruction, hub height is not inferred from any generic turbine model.


wind_farm_id: 6406
canonical_id: 07cfd334-276a-4cc0-9166-aa86ce78b64c
wind_farm_name: Kattegat II
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 8551.0
resolved_source_type: emodnet
resolved_source_name: EMODnet Human Activities
resolved_source_detail: EMODnet Jan 2026
citation_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMODnet Human Activities
source_of_record_type: public data portal
source_of_record_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
source_of_record_licence: Free and open public portal
research_source_name: Danish Energy Agency hearing notice
research_source_type: government
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Web sources describe capacity ranges and planning area but do not state a turbine count. This therefore differs from neither confirms nor disproves the non-web validation signal of 0 in EMODnet; the likely reason is that EMODnet uses 0 as a placeholder for an unbuilt concept area rather than an actual design count.


wind_farm_id: 6406
canonical_id: 07cfd334-276a-4cc0-9166-aa86ce78b64c
wind_farm_name: Kattegat II
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kattegat-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency Kattegat project page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kattegat-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific foundation type was identified in accessible official planning material reviewed. At this pre-award stage, foundation choice appears not yet fixed publicly.


wind_farm_id: 6406
canonical_id: 07cfd334-276a-4cc0-9166-aa86ce78b64c
wind_farm_name: Kattegat II
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.doi.dk/en/vindkraft/artikel/energistyrelsen-godkender-planer-for-mindst-to-gw-havvind
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DOI / DK Medier report on DEA plan adoption
source_of_record_url: https://www.doi.dk/en/vindkraft/artikel/energistyrelsen-godkender-planer-for-mindst-to-gw-havvind
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
DEA adopted the plan in October 2024, but that is not a project-specific construction consent for an awarded wind farm. No establishment consent for a specific concessionaire project was found.


wind_farm_id: 6406
canonical_id: 07cfd334-276a-4cc0-9166-aa86ce78b64c
wind_farm_name: Kattegat II
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://grenaahavn.dk/en/forretningsomraader/offshore-wind/kattegat-2-offshore-windfarm/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Port of Grenaa Kattegat II page
source_of_record_url: https://grenaahavn.dk/en/forretningsomraader/offshore-wind/kattegat-2-offshore-windfarm/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No first-power milestone exists because the project has not been awarded or built. Earlier schedule references to operation by end-2030 were planning targets, not achieved milestones.


wind_farm_id: 6406
canonical_id: 07cfd334-276a-4cc0-9166-aa86ce78b64c
wind_farm_name: Kattegat II
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency hearing notice
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
DEA/port planning material indicated an expected commissioning target by end-2030 before the tender cancellation, but no actual commissioning date can be confirmed after the cancellation.


wind_farm_id: 6407
canonical_id: c8f168c7-0555-4127-bc95-7c1d0a19e66b
wind_farm_name: Nordsren III vest
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/bagom-energioeerne
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA ΓÇô Bag om energi├╕erne
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/bagom-energioeerne
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Nordsren III vest; likely corresponding public-planning name: the area west of Nords├╕en II + III / Nords├╕en II+III+Vest

research_value:
Nordsren III vest; likely corresponding public-planning name: the area west of Nords├╕en II + III / Nords├╕en II+III+Vest

research_summary:
The name in the validation context does not appear as a clear official standalone project page. Danish Energy Agency material consistently refers to the broader planning area as "omr├Ñdet vest for Nords├╕en II + III" and DEA screening material uses the combined planning label "Nords├╕en II+III+Vest." Because of that phase/name ambiguity, this profile treats Nordsren III vest as an alias for that west development area rather than a separately tendered project.


wind_farm_id: 6407
canonical_id: c8f168c7-0555-4127-bc95-7c1d0a19e66b
wind_farm_name: Nordsren III vest
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 40712.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/danish-energy-agency-opens-tenders-three-new-danish-offshore-wind-farms
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/danish-energy-agency-opens-tenders-three-new-danish-offshore-wind-farms
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Danish state / Danish Energy Agency-led planning framework; Current owner(s): Not confirmed; Equity partners: Not confirmed; Operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: Danish state / Danish Energy Agency-led planning framework; Current owner(s): Not confirmed; Equity partners: Not confirmed; Operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
No evidence was found that this west area has been awarded to a private developer or project company. DEA pages describe the North Sea energy-island and surrounding offshore wind farms as state-led planning/tender activity, while the 2024 first-round North Sea I tender received no bids and the 2025 retender concerns different areas ("North Sea Mid" and "North Sea South"), not this legacy west area. Freshest source date relied on for ownership/developer status: 20/11/2025 DEA tender page, which shows newer Danish offshore procurement moving to other named areas, supporting that Nordsren III vest is not a currently awarded owned project.


wind_farm_id: 6407
canonical_id: c8f168c7-0555-4127-bc95-7c1d0a19e66b
wind_farm_name: Nordsren III vest
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/danish-energy-agency-publishes-results-market-dialogue-3-gw-offshore-wind
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/danish-energy-agency-publishes-results-market-dialogue-3-gw-offshore-wind
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No transfer history, JV structure, or equity percentages were found for a standalone "Nordsren III vest" project. Research indicates this is a planning/development-zone style area within the earlier North Sea energy-island concept rather than a project with disclosed ownership changes. Freshest source date relied on: 20/11/2025 DEA tender page; no owner history for this named area was identified.


wind_farm_id: 6407
canonical_id: c8f168c7-0555-4127-bc95-7c1d0a19e66b
wind_farm_name: Nordsren III vest
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Concept
resolved_value: Concept
research_value: Concept
resolved_fact_id: 40713.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/bagom-energioeerne
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA ΓÇô Bag om energi├╕erne
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/bagom-energioeerne
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Best fit is Concept. DEAΓÇÖs public energy-islands material presents this as an investigated/planned area around the North Sea energy-island concept, with reports prepared "for at afs├╕ge mulige placeringer" and final areas politically decided at planning level in November 2020. No project-specific consent application, award, FID, or construction evidence was found for a standalone "Nordsren III vest" wind farm.


wind_farm_id: 6407
canonical_id: c8f168c7-0555-4127-bc95-7c1d0a19e66b
wind_farm_name: Nordsren III vest
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed for a standalone project
resolved_value: Not confirmed for a standalone project
research_value: Not confirmed for a standalone project
resolved_fact_id: 40714.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/2251/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA electrical systems study
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/2251/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No standalone installed/planned MW was confirmed for Nordsren III vest itself. The closest public planning evidence is that the combined planning area Nords├╕en II + III + Vest was analysed as a 3 GW cluster in DEA studies, while the wider long-term North Sea energy-island concept discussed up to 10 GW across multiple areas. Because the user asked for the specific project, the standalone project capacity is kept as Not confirmed rather than assigning the broader cluster value.


wind_farm_id: 6407
canonical_id: c8f168c7-0555-4127-bc95-7c1d0a19e66b
wind_farm_name: Nordsren III vest
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed for a standalone project
resolved_value: Not confirmed for a standalone project
research_value: Not confirmed for a standalone project
resolved_fact_id: 40715.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/2251/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA electrical systems study
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/2251/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific MEC for Nordsren III vest was found. The closest planning-study evidence is for the combined Nords├╕en II + III + Vest scenario, where DEA electrical analysis shows "Effekt leveret [MW] 2.954" for a 3 GW cluster to the energy-island busbar; however that is not explicitly a standalone MEC for this named project.


wind_farm_id: 6407
canonical_id: c8f168c7-0555-4127-bc95-7c1d0a19e66b
wind_farm_name: Nordsren III vest
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/bagom-energioeerne
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA ΓÇô Bag om energi├╕erne
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/bagom-energioeerne
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific turbine model was confirmed on the web. DEA public pages identify this only as a planning area with supporting study reports and do not evidence any awarded turbine selection for a standalone Nordsren III vest project.


wind_farm_id: 6407
canonical_id: c8f168c7-0555-4127-bc95-7c1d0a19e66b
wind_farm_name: Nordsren III vest
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/bagom-energioeerne
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA ΓÇô Bag om energi├╕erne
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/bagom-energioeerne
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific OEM was confirmed. Available DEA material is conceptual planning only and does not evidence an awarded turbine supplier for this named area.


wind_farm_id: 6407
canonical_id: c8f168c7-0555-4127-bc95-7c1d0a19e66b
wind_farm_name: Nordsren III vest
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/2252/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA supplementary fine-screening report
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/2252/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
DEA supplementary screening material includes scenario assumptions using 15 MW turbines for the broader Nords├╕en II+III+Vest 3 GW concept, but that is a study assumption rather than a confirmed turbine choice for this specific project. Therefore the field remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6407
canonical_id: c8f168c7-0555-4127-bc95-7c1d0a19e66b
wind_farm_name: Nordsren III vest
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/bagom-energioeerne
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA ΓÇô Bag om energi├╕erne
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/bagom-energioeerne
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific rotor diameter was confirmed for this named project. DEA public pages show only that the area was investigated through planning studies and do not provide a confirmed rotor specification for a standalone Nordsren III vest project.


wind_farm_id: 6407
canonical_id: c8f168c7-0555-4127-bc95-7c1d0a19e66b
wind_farm_name: Nordsren III vest
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/bagom-energioeerne
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA ΓÇô Bag om energi├╕erne
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/bagom-energioeerne
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific hub height was found, and it must not be inferred from generic turbine assumptions or model brochures. DEA public pages for the area are planning-oriented and do not confirm a hub height for a standalone project.


wind_farm_id: 6407
canonical_id: c8f168c7-0555-4127-bc95-7c1d0a19e66b
wind_farm_name: Nordsren III vest
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 8552.0
resolved_source_type: emodnet
resolved_source_name: EMODnet Human Activities
resolved_source_detail: EMODnet Jan 2026
citation_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMODnet Human Activities
source_of_record_type: public data portal
source_of_record_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
source_of_record_licence: Free and open public portal
research_source_name: DEA supplementary fine-screening report
research_source_type: government report
research_source_url: https://ens.dk/media/2252/download
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
No web source confirmed a standalone turbine count for Nordsren III vest. DEA conceptual studies for the broader Nords├╕en II+III+Vest 3 GW scenario imply layouts around 3 ├ù 67 15 MW turbines = 201 turbines, but that is a study scenario for the combined cluster, not a confirmed project count for this named area. This therefore aligns with the database validation signal of 0 / concept in the sense that no standalone built or awarded turbine count is web-confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6407
canonical_id: c8f168c7-0555-4127-bc95-7c1d0a19e66b
wind_farm_name: Nordsren III vest
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/bagom-energioeerne
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA ΓÇô Bag om energi├╕erne
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/bagom-energioeerne
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
DEA public material identifies a seabed/geology report for "Omr├Ñdet vest for Nords├╕en II + III", but no accessible authoritative page found in this repair pass confirms a project-selected foundation type for a standalone Nordsren III vest development. Therefore this remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6407
canonical_id: c8f168c7-0555-4127-bc95-7c1d0a19e66b
wind_farm_name: Nordsren III vest
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/offshore-wind-power/denmarks-energy-islands
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA Energy Islands page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/offshore-wind-power/denmarks-energy-islands
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific consent or construction permit date was found for a standalone Nordsren III vest project.


wind_farm_id: 6407
canonical_id: c8f168c7-0555-4127-bc95-7c1d0a19e66b
wind_farm_name: Nordsren III vest
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/danish-energy-agency-publishes-results-market-dialogue-3-gw-offshore-wind
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/danish-energy-agency-publishes-results-market-dialogue-3-gw-offshore-wind
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No FID was found; the area appears not to have progressed to an awarded project company, let alone FID.


wind_farm_id: 6407
canonical_id: c8f168c7-0555-4127-bc95-7c1d0a19e66b
wind_farm_name: Nordsren III vest
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/danish-energy-agency-opens-tenders-three-new-danish-offshore-wind-farms
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/danish-energy-agency-opens-tenders-three-new-danish-offshore-wind-farms
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No construction or operating project was confirmed, so no first power date exists for this specific named area.


wind_farm_id: 6407
canonical_id: c8f168c7-0555-4127-bc95-7c1d0a19e66b
wind_farm_name: Nordsren III vest
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/danish-energy-agency-opens-tenders-three-new-danish-offshore-wind-farms
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/danish-energy-agency-opens-tenders-three-new-danish-offshore-wind-farms
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No commissioning date was found because no standalone built or awarded project was confirmed for this name.


