# wind_farm_dossier_fields

wind_farm_id: 6614
canonical_id: f881ab5f-4cb6-4125-9ffb-765fb8f3b35b
wind_farm_name: Broadshore
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://broadshorewind.co.uk/the-project/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Broadshore project page
source_of_record_url: https://broadshorewind.co.uk/the-project/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources reviewed describe the project as considering 32 to 60 wind turbine generators but do not name a turbine model. No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided in the prompt, so the required result is Not confirmed rather than inference.


wind_farm_id: 6614
canonical_id: f881ab5f-4cb6-4125-9ffb-765fb8f3b35b
wind_farm_name: Broadshore
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Crown Estate Scotland SCDS update PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific accessible source located names an OEM for Broadshore. The project remains in design refinement and consent-stage work.


wind_farm_id: 6614
canonical_id: f881ab5f-4cb6-4125-9ffb-765fb8f3b35b
wind_farm_name: Broadshore
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://broadshorewind.co.uk/the-project/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Broadshore project page
source_of_record_url: https://broadshorewind.co.uk/the-project/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible project-specific source explicitly states turbine rating per unit for Broadshore. The published range of 32 to 60 turbines for 900 MW implies multiple design options, so unit rating should not be inferred.


wind_farm_id: 6614
canonical_id: f881ab5f-4cb6-4125-9ffb-765fb8f3b35b
wind_farm_name: Broadshore
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://broadshorewind.co.uk/the-project/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Broadshore project page
source_of_record_url: https://broadshorewind.co.uk/the-project/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible project-specific source explicitly confirms hub height for Broadshore, and no linked EuroWindWakes fallback value was supplied in the prompt.


wind_farm_id: 6614
canonical_id: f881ab5f-4cb6-4125-9ffb-765fb8f3b35b
wind_farm_name: Broadshore
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 32 to 60 planned
resolved_value: 32 to 60 planned
research_value: 32 to 60 planned
resolved_fact_id: 34006.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://broadshorewind.co.uk/the-project/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Broadshore project page
source_of_record_url: https://broadshorewind.co.uk/the-project/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The live project page explicitly says Broadshore is proposed to have “between 32 and 60 wind turbine generators” depending on turbine capacity. This does not align with the supplied non-web validation signal of 0, which is most likely a lease-stage / dataset placeholder rather than a project design count. As the project is pre-consent, a range is the best-supported web value.


wind_farm_id: 6614
canonical_id: f881ab5f-4cb6-4125-9ffb-765fb8f3b35b
wind_farm_name: Broadshore
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34007.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://broadshorewind.co.uk/the-project/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Broadshore project page
source_of_record_url: https://broadshorewind.co.uk/the-project/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Floating and/or fixed-bottom under consideration; station-keeping systems including mooring lines and anchors

resolved_value:
Floating and/or fixed-bottom under consideration; station-keeping systems including mooring lines and anchors

research_summary:
The project website explicitly says design options under consideration include “floating substructures and/or fixed bottom substructures” plus station-keeping systems. Because no final foundation concept is confirmed for Broadshore alone, the field should reflect the options under consideration rather than a single inferred as-built type.


wind_farm_id: 6614
canonical_id: f881ab5f-4cb6-4125-9ffb-765fb8f3b35b
wind_farm_name: Broadshore
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://broadshorewind.co.uk/the-project/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Broadshore project page
source_of_record_url: https://broadshorewind.co.uk/the-project/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No consent grant date was found. The project website says consent decisions expected mid-2026 to mid-2027, indicating consent has not yet been granted.


wind_farm_id: 6614
canonical_id: f881ab5f-4cb6-4125-9ffb-765fb8f3b35b
wind_farm_name: Broadshore
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://nadara.com/projects/p2
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Nadara Broadshore portfolio page
source_of_record_url: https://nadara.com/projects/p2
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific evidence of FID was found; timeline sources show Broadshore remains in pre-consent / design development.


wind_farm_id: 6614
canonical_id: f881ab5f-4cb6-4125-9ffb-765fb8f3b35b
wind_farm_name: Broadshore
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://broadshorewind.co.uk/the-project/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Broadshore project page
source_of_record_url: https://broadshorewind.co.uk/the-project/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No first power date is published in accessible project-specific sources. The indicative timeline only points to commercial operation in the early 2030s.


wind_farm_id: 6614
canonical_id: f881ab5f-4cb6-4125-9ffb-765fb8f3b35b
wind_farm_name: Broadshore
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://broadshorewind.co.uk/the-project/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Broadshore project page
source_of_record_url: https://broadshorewind.co.uk/the-project/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No full commissioning date is published in accessible project-specific sources. The website only gives “Early 2030s” for commercial operation.


wind_farm_id: 6615
canonical_id: 93b96cfb-c1ce-4251-a851-70f1369ba57b
wind_farm_name: Buchan Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Buchan Offshore Wind; formerly Floating Energy Allyance
research_value: Buchan Offshore Wind; formerly Floating Energy Allyance
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Crown Estate Scotland SCDS Outlook Update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.crownestatescotland.com/sites/default/files/2023-07/buchan-offshore-wind-farm-scds-outlook-july-2023-update.pdf

research_summary:
Official project company and Crown Estate Scotland materials identify the project as Buchan Offshore Wind and note it was formerly known as Floating Energy Allyance. The project website places it about 75 km northeast of Fraserburgh / Aberdeenshire coast.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.crownestatescotland.com/sites/default/files/2023-07/buchan-offshore-wind-farm-scds-outlook-july-2023-update.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6615
canonical_id: 93b96cfb-c1ce-4251-a851-70f1369ba57b
wind_farm_name: Buchan Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Joint venture developer: BayWa r.e., Elicio, BW Ideol; current owner split not confirmed
resolved_value: Joint venture developer: BayWa r.e., Elicio, BW Ideol; current owner split not confirmed
research_value: Joint venture developer: BayWa r.e., Elicio, BW Ideol; current owner split not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 34008.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Buchan Onshore Scoping Report
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://buchan-eia.com/wp-content/uploads/Buchan-Onshore-EIAR_Appendix-1.1-Onshore-Scoping-Report.pdf

research_summary:
Freshest ownership evidence relied on: Buchan onshore scoping material published in 2025 says the applicant is a joint venture between BayWa r.e., Elicio, and BW Ideol. Recent official partner pages still describe Buchan as being developed by those three parties. I did not find a newer official source that explicitly states the current equity percentages, so percentages remain Not confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://buchan-eia.com/wp-content/uploads/Buchan-Onshore-EIAR_Appendix-1.1-Onshore-Scoping-Report.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6615
canonical_id: 93b96cfb-c1ce-4251-a851-70f1369ba57b
wind_farm_name: Buchan Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Crown Estate Scotland SCDS Outlook Update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Initially bid as Floating Energy Allyance; now Buchan Offshore Wind; three-party JV of BayWa r.e., Elicio and BW Ideol

research_value:
Initially bid as Floating Energy Allyance; now Buchan Offshore Wind; three-party JV of BayWa r.e., Elicio and BW Ideol

citation_url:
https://www.crownestatescotland.com/sites/default/files/2023-07/buchan-offshore-wind-farm-scds-outlook-july-2023-update.pdf

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on for the current partnership is 2025. Crown Estate Scotland’s SCDS update says “Buchan Offshore Wind Limited (formerly known as Floating Energy Allyance)” and lists BayWa r.e. UK Ltd, Elicio NV and BW Ideol SA. BW Ideol’s project page also says the consortium bid in ScotWind as Floating Energy Allyance, today known as Buchan Offshore Wind. No later authoritative source found showing a changed shareholding or operator.


wind_farm_id: 6615
canonical_id: 93b96cfb-c1ce-4251-a851-70f1369ba57b
wind_farm_name: Buchan Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
research_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_fact_id: 34009.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://buchanoffshorewind.com/planning-consent/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Buchan Planning & Consent page
source_of_record_url: https://buchanoffshorewind.com/planning-consent/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project website states offshore consent was submitted in 08/2025 and onshore planning in 10/2025, and both are under consideration. Scottish Government’s offshore wind ambition update also lists Buchan as Status: In Planning. This matches the Boundary Layer label In Planning / Consent Application Submitted.


wind_farm_id: 6615
canonical_id: 93b96cfb-c1ce-4251-a851-70f1369ba57b
wind_farm_name: Buchan Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 960 MW planned
resolved_value: 960 MW planned
research_value: 960 MW planned
resolved_fact_id: 34010.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Crown Estate Scotland SCDS Outlook Update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Multiple current sources support 960 MW. The project site describes a near-1 GW floating project, while Crown Estate Scotland’s SCDS update gives the clearer planned value of 960 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6615
canonical_id: 93b96cfb-c1ce-4251-a851-70f1369ba57b
wind_farm_name: Buchan Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://buchanoffshorewind.com/planning-consent/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Buchan Planning & Consent page
source_of_record_url: https://buchanoffshorewind.com/planning-consent/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I found project and regulator sources for overall project capacity, grid connection route, and consent submissions, but no openly accessible source clearly stating a project-specific MEC/export capacity figure distinct from installed/planned generation capacity.


wind_farm_id: 6615
canonical_id: 93b96cfb-c1ce-4251-a851-70f1369ba57b
wind_farm_name: Buchan Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://buchanoffshorewind.com/project/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Buchan project page
source_of_record_url: https://buchanoffshorewind.com/project/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific sources confirm only up to 70 floating turbines and that the foundation is BW Ideol Damping Pool®. No authoritative project source found naming a turbine model for this project, and no linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided, so I have not inferred one.


wind_farm_id: 6615
canonical_id: 93b96cfb-c1ce-4251-a851-70f1369ba57b
wind_farm_name: Buchan Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.bw-ideol.com/en/buchan-offshore-wind-scotwind
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: BW Ideol Buchan project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.bw-ideol.com/en/buchan-offshore-wind-scotwind
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific authoritative source located that explicitly names the wind turbine OEM for Buchan Offshore Wind. Foundation supplier information does not confirm the turbine OEM.


wind_farm_id: 6615
canonical_id: 93b96cfb-c1ce-4251-a851-70f1369ba57b
wind_farm_name: Buchan Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Crown Estate Scotland SCDS Outlook Update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Source conflict/ambiguity exists between older and newer project materials: Crown Estate Scotland’s 2023 SCDS update says “some 60 16MW turbines”, while the current project website says “up to 70 turbines” without naming unit rating. Because no current project-specific source explicitly confirms the final turbine rating, this field remains Not confirmed rather than inferred.


wind_farm_id: 6615
canonical_id: 93b96cfb-c1ce-4251-a851-70f1369ba57b
wind_farm_name: Buchan Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://buchanoffshorewind.com/project/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Buchan project page
source_of_record_url: https://buchanoffshorewind.com/project/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific authoritative source found that ties a rotor diameter to Buchan Offshore Wind. Per instruction, I have not inferred it from generic turbine platforms or other projects.


wind_farm_id: 6615
canonical_id: 93b96cfb-c1ce-4251-a851-70f1369ba57b
wind_farm_name: Buchan Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://buchanoffshorewind.com/project/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Buchan project page
source_of_record_url: https://buchanoffshorewind.com/project/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific authoritative source found that states hub height for Buchan Offshore Wind. Per instruction, I have not inferred hub height from turbine platform assumptions.


wind_farm_id: 6615
canonical_id: 93b96cfb-c1ce-4251-a851-70f1369ba57b
wind_farm_name: Buchan Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 70 turbines
resolved_value: Up to 70 turbines
research_value: Up to 70 turbines
resolved_fact_id: 34011.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://buchanoffshorewind.com/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Buchan homepage
source_of_record_url: https://buchanoffshorewind.com/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The current project website repeatedly states up to 70 turbines, while the 2023 Crown Estate Scotland SCDS update described some 60 16MW turbines at an earlier design stage. I therefore treat up to 70 as the better current web-backed figure, while noting it differs from the non-web validation signal of 0 turbines, which likely reflects that the project is still unbuilt / planning-stage rather than a final design count.


wind_farm_id: 6615
canonical_id: 93b96cfb-c1ce-4251-a851-70f1369ba57b
wind_farm_name: Buchan Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Floating concrete foundation; BW Ideol Damping Pool®
resolved_value: Floating concrete foundation; BW Ideol Damping Pool®
research_value: Floating concrete foundation; BW Ideol Damping Pool®
resolved_fact_id: 34012.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://buchanoffshorewind.com/technology/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Buchan technology page
source_of_record_url: https://buchanoffshorewind.com/technology/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project website explicitly says Buchan has selected BW Ideol’s Damping Pool® floating foundation and describes concrete floating substructures. This is project-specific and authoritative.


wind_farm_id: 6615
canonical_id: 93b96cfb-c1ce-4251-a851-70f1369ba57b
wind_farm_name: Buchan Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://buchanoffshorewind.com/planning-consent/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Buchan Planning & Consent page
source_of_record_url: https://buchanoffshorewind.com/planning-consent/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Offshore and onshore applications were submitted in 08/2025 and 10/2025 respectively, but I found no evidence that consent has yet been granted. Therefore there is no consent date to report.


wind_farm_id: 6615
canonical_id: 93b96cfb-c1ce-4251-a851-70f1369ba57b
wind_farm_name: Buchan Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://buchanoffshorewind.com/planning-consent/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Buchan Planning & Consent page
source_of_record_url: https://buchanoffshorewind.com/planning-consent/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No authoritative source found showing FID taken. The project website instead says the next steps after consents are to compete in a future CfD round, indicating pre-FID status.


wind_farm_id: 6615
canonical_id: 93b96cfb-c1ce-4251-a851-70f1369ba57b
wind_farm_name: Buchan Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://buchanoffshorewind.com/planning-consent/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Buchan Planning & Consent page
source_of_record_url: https://buchanoffshorewind.com/planning-consent/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No first power date is available because the project is still in planning. The project website only indicates first power is expected in the 2030s after consent and later construction.


wind_farm_id: 6615
canonical_id: 93b96cfb-c1ce-4251-a851-70f1369ba57b
wind_farm_name: Buchan Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Scottish Government Offshore Wind Ambition Annex A
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No full commissioning date has been confirmed in current project-specific sources. The project remains in planning / consent application stage.


wind_farm_id: 6616
canonical_id: 52a843d9-e6b8-4915-b43d-4096475a3244
wind_farm_name: West of Orkney Wind Farm
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: West of Orkney Windfarm
research_value: West of Orkney Windfarm
citation_url: https://www.westoforkney.com/project
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: West of Orkney project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.westoforkney.com/project
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official project name is consistently presented as West of Orkney Windfarm by the project website and developer pages. It sits in the ScotWind N1 Plan Option west of Orkney. No later rebranding found.


wind_farm_id: 6616
canonical_id: 52a843d9-e6b8-4915-b43d-4096475a3244
wind_farm_name: West of Orkney Wind Farm
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34013.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.westoforkney.com/news/west-orkney-windfarm-secures-offshore-consent
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: West of Orkney consent news
source_of_record_url: https://www.westoforkney.com/news/west-orkney-windfarm-secures-offshore-consent
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Offshore Wind Power Ltd (JV of Corio Generation, TotalEnergies and Renewable Infrastructure Development Group (RIDG)); current owner(s): Corio Generation, TotalEnergies and RIDG; equity partners and ownership percentages: Not confirmed; operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: Offshore Wind Power Ltd (JV of Corio Generation, TotalEnergies and Renewable Infrastructure Development Group (RIDG)); current owner(s): Corio Generation, TotalEnergies and RIDG; equity partners and ownership percentages: Not confirmed; operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
Freshest dated ownership evidence relied on is Corio's 12/03/2025 update confirming the joint venture parties, plus the project's 27/06/2025 consent announcement confirming the same partnership. I did not find an official current percentage split that reconciles to 100%, so percentages remain Not confirmed rather than inferred.


wind_farm_id: 6616
canonical_id: 52a843d9-e6b8-4915-b43d-4096475a3244
wind_farm_name: West of Orkney Wind Farm
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.westoforkney.com/news/totalenergies-green-investment-group-ridg-join-forces
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Historic consortium announcement
source_of_record_url: https://www.westoforkney.com/news/totalenergies-green-investment-group-ridg-join-forces
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
JV established by TotalEnergies, GIG and RIDG before ScotWind; Macquarie’s participation is now led by Corio Generation; current JV parties publicly stated as Corio Generation, TotalEnergies and RIDG

research_value:
JV established by TotalEnergies, GIG and RIDG before ScotWind; Macquarie’s participation is now led by Corio Generation; current JV parties publicly stated as Corio Generation, TotalEnergies and RIDG

research_summary:
The historic consortium announcement shows TotalEnergies + GIG + RIDG. Corio states the option-to-lease signing was its first since Corio became operational on 01/04/2022, indicating Macquarie’s position is now represented through Corio. Freshest source date relied on for current partnership is 27/06/2025. No dated official source found with post-2025 percentage changes.


wind_farm_id: 6616
canonical_id: 52a843d9-e6b8-4915-b43d-4096475a3244
wind_farm_name: West of Orkney Wind Farm
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Consented
resolved_value: Consented
research_value: Consented
resolved_fact_id: 34014.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.westoforkney.com/project
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: West of Orkney project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.westoforkney.com/project
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Scottish Ministers granted offshore consent on 27/06/2025, and The Highland Council had already granted planning permission in principle for the onshore works in June 2024. No FID found, so the closest exact Boundary Layer label is Consented rather than FID Taken, Pre-Construction.


wind_farm_id: 6616
canonical_id: 52a843d9-e6b8-4915-b43d-4096475a3244
wind_farm_name: West of Orkney Wind Farm
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2000 MW
resolved_value: 2000 MW
research_value: 2000 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34015.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.westoforkney.com/project
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: West of Orkney project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.westoforkney.com/project
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Multiple project-specific sources describe the project as around/maximum 2 GW. This aligns with the database context value of 2000 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6616
canonical_id: 52a843d9-e6b8-4915-b43d-4096475a3244
wind_farm_name: West of Orkney Wind Farm
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Design and Access Statement
source_of_record_licence: public document download
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.westoforkney.com/application/files/5916/9878/0090/West_of_Orkney_Windfarm_-_Design_and_Access_Statement.pdf

research_summary:
I found onshore design evidence for up to five export circuits at up to 420 kV, but no project-specific source explicitly stating a single MW MEC value. To avoid confusing gross capacity with export capability, MEC is left Not confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.westoforkney.com/application/files/5916/9878/0090/West_of_Orkney_Windfarm_-_Design_and_Access_Statement.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6616
canonical_id: 52a843d9-e6b8-4915-b43d-4096475a3244
wind_farm_name: West of Orkney Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.westoforkney.com/download_file/151/268
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: PAC consultation text
source_of_record_url: https://www.westoforkney.com/download_file/151/268
source_of_record_licence: public document download
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific documents define an envelope only; no authoritative project source found naming a turbine model. Per instruction, not inferred from generic OEM platforms.


wind_farm_id: 6616
canonical_id: 52a843d9-e6b8-4915-b43d-4096475a3244
wind_farm_name: West of Orkney Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.westoforkney.com/project
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: West of Orkney project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.westoforkney.com/project
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific source identified an OEM. No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided, so field remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6616
canonical_id: 52a843d9-e6b8-4915-b43d-4096475a3244
wind_farm_name: West of Orkney Wind Farm
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.westoforkney.com/project
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: West of Orkney project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.westoforkney.com/project
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
With 2,000 MW and up to 125 turbines, implied unit ratings could vary by final layout; no source explicitly states a selected turbine rating. Not inferred.


wind_farm_id: 6616
canonical_id: 52a843d9-e6b8-4915-b43d-4096475a3244
wind_farm_name: West of Orkney Wind Farm
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 236 m to 330 m
resolved_value: 236 m to 330 m
research_value: 236 m to 330 m
resolved_fact_id: 34016.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.westoforkney.com/download_file/151/268
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: PAC consultation text
source_of_record_url: https://www.westoforkney.com/download_file/151/268
source_of_record_licence: public document download
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project consultation/reporting documents explicitly state a rotor diameter envelope of between 236 m and 330 m for this project. This is a project design envelope, not an as-built selection.


wind_farm_id: 6616
canonical_id: 52a843d9-e6b8-4915-b43d-4096475a3244
wind_farm_name: West of Orkney Wind Farm
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.westoforkney.com/download_file/151/268
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: PAC consultation text
source_of_record_url: https://www.westoforkney.com/download_file/151/268
source_of_record_licence: public document download
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific source found an explicit hub height, and there is no linked EuroWindWakes fallback in the provided context. Not inferred from tip height or generic turbine products.


wind_farm_id: 6616
canonical_id: 52a843d9-e6b8-4915-b43d-4096475a3244
wind_farm_name: West of Orkney Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 125
resolved_value: Up to 125
research_value: Up to 125
resolved_fact_id: 34017.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.westoforkney.com/news/west-orkney-windfarm-secures-offshore-consent
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: West of Orkney consent news
source_of_record_url: https://www.westoforkney.com/news/west-orkney-windfarm-secures-offshore-consent
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current web sources consistently describe the consented project as up to 125 turbines on fixed foundations. This differs from the database validation signals of 0 turbines, which likely reflect the project not being built yet or a dataset placeholder rather than the consent envelope.


wind_farm_id: 6616
canonical_id: 52a843d9-e6b8-4915-b43d-4096475a3244
wind_farm_name: West of Orkney Wind Farm
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34018.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Offshore EIA summary chapter
source_of_record_licence: public document download
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Fixed-bottom foundations; consent materials reference monopile, piled jacket or suction bucket jacket options

resolved_value:
Fixed-bottom foundations; consent materials reference monopile, piled jacket or suction bucket jacket options

citation_url:
https://www.westoforkney.com/application/files/7816/9822/6718/West_of_Orkney_Windfarm_Onshore_EIA_Report_-_Chapter_18_-_Offshore_EIA_Summary.pdf

research_summary:
Earlier scoping considered fixed and/or floating concepts, but the consented/offshore EIA summary and 2025 consent news describe up to 125 turbines on fixed foundations. The project-specific EIA summary lists monopile, piled jacket or suction bucket jacket as the fixed-bottom options.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.westoforkney.com/application/files/7816/9822/6718/West_of_Orkney_Windfarm_Onshore_EIA_Report_-_Chapter_18_-_Offshore_EIA_Summary.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6616
canonical_id: 52a843d9-e6b8-4915-b43d-4096475a3244
wind_farm_name: West of Orkney Wind Farm
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 27/06/2025
resolved_value: 27/06/2025
research_value: 27/06/2025
resolved_fact_id: 34019.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.westoforkney.com/news/west-orkney-windfarm-secures-offshore-consent
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: West of Orkney consent news
source_of_record_url: https://www.westoforkney.com/news/west-orkney-windfarm-secures-offshore-consent
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Offshore consent was granted by Scottish Ministers on 27/06/2025. Onshore planning permission in principle had already been granted separately on 18/06/2024, but the principal offshore project consent date is 27/06/2025.


wind_farm_id: 6616
canonical_id: 52a843d9-e6b8-4915-b43d-4096475a3244
wind_farm_name: West of Orkney Wind Farm
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Offshore EIA report chapter 2
source_of_record_licence: public document download
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/west_of_orkney_windfarm_offshore_eia_report_-_chapter_2_-_need_for_the_project__1.pdf

research_summary:
No evidence found that FID has been taken. A project EIA chapter references investment activity “in advance of a final investment decision in 2026”, which indicates FID had not yet occurred at the time of that document.

source_of_record_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/west_of_orkney_windfarm_offshore_eia_report_-_chapter_2_-_need_for_the_project__1.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6616
canonical_id: 52a843d9-e6b8-4915-b43d-4096475a3244
wind_farm_name: West of Orkney Wind Farm
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/01/2030
resolved_value: 01/01/2030
research_value: 01/01/2030
resolved_fact_id: 34020.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.westoforkney.com/project
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: West of Orkney project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.westoforkney.com/project
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project page says first power is scheduled by 2030, while the homepage tile still shows “2029” target first generation. I use 01/01/2030 because it is the clearer current project-page wording and is also echoed by a 2025 trade report targeting first power by 2030.


wind_farm_id: 6617
canonical_id: d18fd707-05b9-4fc6-b1eb-4082a64c6ecf
wind_farm_name: Havbredey
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Havbredey
research_value: Havbredey
citation_url: https://northlandpowerscotwind.co.uk/havbredey/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Havbredey project website
source_of_record_url: https://northlandpowerscotwind.co.uk/havbredey/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Northland’s project page says Havbredey is the floating ScotWind project and confirms it was previously the N2 site; the dedicated project site also presents Havbredey as the official project name.


wind_farm_id: 6617
canonical_id: d18fd707-05b9-4fc6-b1eb-4082a64c6ecf
wind_farm_name: Havbredey
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34021.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://northlandpowerscotwind.co.uk/havbredey/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Havbredey project website
source_of_record_url: https://northlandpowerscotwind.co.uk/havbredey/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Northland Power and ESB. Current owners: Northland Power 75.5%, ESB 24.5%. Operator: Northland Power.

resolved_value:
Developer: Northland Power and ESB. Current owners: Northland Power 75.5%, ESB 24.5%. Operator: Northland Power.

research_summary:
The freshest ownership evidence used is Northland’s ScotWind portfolio page (live page crawled 2026; states May 2023 ESB transaction and current 75.5%/24.5% split) and UK Parliament written evidence published in 04/2026, which repeats the same ownership split. Northland is explicitly stated to lead development, construction, and operation.


wind_farm_id: 6617
canonical_id: d18fd707-05b9-4fc6-b1eb-4082a64c6ecf
wind_farm_name: Havbredey
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ESB annual report
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Initially 100% Northland Power at ScotWind award; ESB acquired 24.5% in 05/2023; current split Northland 75.5% / ESB 24.5%.

research_value:
Initially 100% Northland Power at ScotWind award; ESB acquired 24.5% in 05/2023; current split Northland 75.5% / ESB 24.5%.

citation_url:
https://cdn.esb.ie/media/docs/default-source/investor-relations-documents/2023-annual-report-and-financial-statements-march-13.pdf?sfvrsn=5519b7d0_3

research_summary:
The freshest dated ownership-history evidence relied on is ESB’s annual report published in 03/2026, which says ESB purchased the two 24.5% stakes in May 2023. Northland’s portfolio page confirms Northland had the original award rights and retained 75.5%.

source_of_record_url:
https://cdn.esb.ie/media/docs/default-source/investor-relations-documents/2023-annual-report-and-financial-statements-march-13.pdf?sfvrsn=5519b7d0_3


wind_farm_id: 6617
canonical_id: d18fd707-05b9-4fc6-b1eb-4082a64c6ecf
wind_farm_name: Havbredey
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
resolved_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
research_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
resolved_fact_id: 34022.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.crownestatescotland.com/news/foi-310scotwind-offer-agreements
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Crown Estate Scotland FOI 310 ScotWind Offer Agreements
source_of_record_url: https://www.crownestatescotland.com/news/foi-310scotwind-offer-agreements
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Crown Estate Scotland confirms ScotWind option agreements were signed in 04/2022. Havbredey’s own site shows a 2025 request for offshore scoping opinion and 2028/29 consent submissions, while Marine Scotland search results show a published Havbredey scoping report in 2025. Because no project-specific consent application is evidenced yet, the closest Boundary Layer label remains Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning; nuance: the project has moved into scoping work but is still pre-application rather than consent-submitted.


wind_farm_id: 6617
canonical_id: d18fd707-05b9-4fc6-b1eb-4082a64c6ecf
wind_farm_name: Havbredey
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1500 MW
resolved_value: 1500 MW
research_value: 1500 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34023.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://northlandpowerscotwind.co.uk/havbredey/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Havbredey project website
source_of_record_url: https://northlandpowerscotwind.co.uk/havbredey/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Havbredey’s project facts state 1.5GW projected generating capacity; Parliament written evidence from 2026 describes Havbredey as up to 1,500MW. This aligns with the validation context.


wind_farm_id: 6617
canonical_id: d18fd707-05b9-4fc6-b1eb-4082a64c6ecf
wind_farm_name: Havbredey
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://northlandpowerscotwind.co.uk/havbredey/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Havbredey project website
source_of_record_url: https://northlandpowerscotwind.co.uk/havbredey/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible official or regulator source found in this research set explicitly states a Havbredey grid MEC distinct from planned installed capacity. I have therefore not inferred MEC from gross capacity.


wind_farm_id: 6617
canonical_id: d18fd707-05b9-4fc6-b1eb-4082a64c6ecf
wind_farm_name: Havbredey
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://northlandpowerscotwind.co.uk/havbredey/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Havbredey project website
source_of_record_url: https://northlandpowerscotwind.co.uk/havbredey/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Havbredey project materials reviewed here describe only project-scale parameters such as capacity, tip height, floating technology, and turbine count range. No project-specific turbine model was explicitly confirmed, and no linked EuroWindWakes turbine fallback row was provided in the prompt.


wind_farm_id: 6617
canonical_id: d18fd707-05b9-4fc6-b1eb-4082a64c6ecf
wind_farm_name: Havbredey
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://northlandpowerscotwind.co.uk/havbredey/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Havbredey project website
source_of_record_url: https://northlandpowerscotwind.co.uk/havbredey/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific web source in the reviewed material names the OEM for Havbredey. Per instructions, this is left unconfirmed rather than inferred from generic floating-wind market assumptions.


wind_farm_id: 6617
canonical_id: d18fd707-05b9-4fc6-b1eb-4082a64c6ecf
wind_farm_name: Havbredey
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://northlandpowerscotwind.co.uk/havbredey/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Havbredey project website
source_of_record_url: https://northlandpowerscotwind.co.uk/havbredey/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific source explicitly states turbine nameplate rating for Havbredey. The available official/public sources only support total capacity and an upper-bound turbine count.


wind_farm_id: 6617
canonical_id: d18fd707-05b9-4fc6-b1eb-4082a64c6ecf
wind_farm_name: Havbredey
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://northlandpowerscotwind.co.uk/havbredey/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Havbredey project website
source_of_record_url: https://northlandpowerscotwind.co.uk/havbredey/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific source reviewed here explicitly states rotor diameter. The published project facts include maximum blade-tip height, but that does not confirm rotor diameter.


wind_farm_id: 6617
canonical_id: d18fd707-05b9-4fc6-b1eb-4082a64c6ecf
wind_farm_name: Havbredey
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://northlandpowerscotwind.co.uk/havbredey/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Havbredey project website
source_of_record_url: https://northlandpowerscotwind.co.uk/havbredey/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project site gives mean wind speed at hub height and maximum blade tip height, but no explicit hub-height dimension. Per instruction, hub height is not inferred from tip height or assumed turbine platform.


wind_farm_id: 6617
canonical_id: d18fd707-05b9-4fc6-b1eb-4082a64c6ecf
wind_farm_name: Havbredey
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 110
resolved_value: Up to 110
research_value: Up to 110
resolved_fact_id: 34024.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://northlandpowerscotwind.co.uk/havbredey/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Havbredey project website
source_of_record_url: https://northlandpowerscotwind.co.uk/havbredey/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Havbredey’s own project page states up to 110 wind turbines. Another recent public PDF from a planning context references Havbredey as up to 108 turbines, indicating design refinement may still be occurring at scoping stage; I therefore retain the project-specific official website figure up to 110 as the best current public value and note the conflict. This differs from the database validation signal of 0, which likely reflects the project being unbuilt / dataset placeholder logic rather than a web-confirmed design count.


wind_farm_id: 6617
canonical_id: d18fd707-05b9-4fc6-b1eb-4082a64c6ecf
wind_farm_name: Havbredey
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Floating substructures with mooring system and anchors
resolved_value: Floating substructures with mooring system and anchors
research_value: Floating substructures with mooring system and anchors
resolved_fact_id: 34025.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://northlandpowerscotwind.co.uk/havbredey/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Havbredey project website
source_of_record_url: https://northlandpowerscotwind.co.uk/havbredey/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The dedicated project page explicitly says each turbine would comprise a floating substructure, and associated mooring system and anchors; Northland’s portfolio page also distinguishes Havbredey as the floating site.


wind_farm_id: 6617
canonical_id: d18fd707-05b9-4fc6-b1eb-4082a64c6ecf
wind_farm_name: Havbredey
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://northlandpowerscotwind.co.uk/havbredey/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Havbredey project website
source_of_record_url: https://northlandpowerscotwind.co.uk/havbredey/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project timeline shows consent submissions are planned for 2028/29, so no consent date is yet evidenced.


wind_farm_id: 6617
canonical_id: d18fd707-05b9-4fc6-b1eb-4082a64c6ecf
wind_farm_name: Havbredey
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.northlandpower.com/en/projects-and-updates/scotwind-scottish-offshore-wind.aspx
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Northland Power ScotWind project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.northlandpower.com/en/projects-and-updates/scotwind-scottish-offshore-wind.aspx
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No source reviewed here indicates FID has been taken. The project remains early-stage / pre-application.


wind_farm_id: 6617
canonical_id: d18fd707-05b9-4fc6-b1eb-4082a64c6ecf
wind_farm_name: Havbredey
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/01/2036
resolved_value: 01/01/2036
research_value: 01/01/2036
resolved_fact_id: 34026.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://northlandpowerscotwind.co.uk/havbredey/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Havbredey project website
source_of_record_url: https://northlandpowerscotwind.co.uk/havbredey/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Havbredey’s own indicative timeline says 2036 Fully operational. Northland’s broader ScotWind page describes Havbredey COD only as mid 2030s; the project-specific site therefore provides the more precise date normalization basis, converted to 01/01/2036 because only the year is stated.


wind_farm_id: 6618
canonical_id: 0517438b-7f3b-4619-a30b-c02e77c21679
wind_farm_name: Spiorad na Mara
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Spiorad na Mara; historic / alternative name: N4
research_value: Spiorad na Mara; historic / alternative name: N4
citation_url: https://www.offshorewind.biz/2023/03/23/northland-power-names-wind-projects-offshore-scotland/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: OffshoreWIND.biz article quoting Northland project naming
source_of_record_url: https://www.offshorewind.biz/2023/03/23/northland-power-names-wind-projects-offshore-scotland/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Crown Estate Scotland lists Spiorad na Mara as a ScotWind project, while project communications state it was previously known as N4.


wind_farm_id: 6618
canonical_id: 0517438b-7f3b-4619-a30b-c02e77c21679
wind_farm_name: Spiorad na Mara
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34041.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Northland Power ScotWind press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Northland Power and ESB; current owners: Northland Power 75.5%, ESB 24.5%; operator: Northland Power

resolved_value:
Developer: Northland Power and ESB; current owners: Northland Power 75.5%, ESB 24.5%; operator: Northland Power

citation_url:
https://northlandpowerscotwind.co.uk/press-release-scoping-report-issued-and-capacity-update-at-spiorad-na-mara-offshore-wind-farm/

research_summary:
The freshest dated ownership evidence found is Northland/Spiorad na Mara project material dated 20/10/2023, which states Northland Power (75.5%) and ESB (24.5%), with Northland leading development, construction and operation. The September 2024 consultation booklet repeats the same split.

source_of_record_url:
https://northlandpowerscotwind.co.uk/press-release-scoping-report-issued-and-capacity-update-at-spiorad-na-mara-offshore-wind-farm/


wind_farm_id: 6618
canonical_id: 0517438b-7f3b-4619-a30b-c02e77c21679
wind_farm_name: Spiorad na Mara
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Northland Power Q1 2023 results
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Awarded to Northland Power in ScotWind in 2022; ESB acquired a 24.5% interest in 2023; current split Northland 75.5% / ESB 24.5%

research_value:
Awarded to Northland Power in ScotWind in 2022; ESB acquired a 24.5% interest in 2023; current split Northland 75.5% / ESB 24.5%

citation_url:
https://www.northlandpower.com/en/news/northland-power-reports-first-quarter-2023-results-and-releases-its-annual-sustainability-report.aspx

research_summary:
Freshest ownership-history evidence used is Northland’s Q1 2023 results release stating ESB signed for 24.5% interest in both projects on 09/05/2023; later project materials dated 20/10/2023 and Sept 2024 confirm the resulting current split.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.northlandpower.com/en/news/northland-power-reports-first-quarter-2023-results-and-releases-its-annual-sustainability-report.aspx


wind_farm_id: 6618
canonical_id: 0517438b-7f3b-4619-a30b-c02e77c21679
wind_farm_name: Spiorad na Mara
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
research_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_fact_id: 34042.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=ml%2Fspiorad-na-mara
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate project page
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=ml%2Fspiorad-na-mara
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
This is no longer just lease-awarded pre-planning: Marine Directorate now shows Project stage: Application and lists Section 36 and marine licence applications submitted 11/03/2026. That fits the Boundary Layer label In Planning / Consent Application Submitted.


wind_farm_id: 6618
canonical_id: 0517438b-7f3b-4619-a30b-c02e77c21679
wind_farm_name: Spiorad na Mara
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 900 MW planned
resolved_value: 900 MW planned
research_value: 900 MW planned
resolved_fact_id: 34043.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Spiorad na Mara public consultation booklet
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://spioradnamara.scot/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Public-Consultation-Booklet-Digital-Version-FINAL.pdf

research_summary:
The original lease context was 840 MW, but project-led sources from October 2023 onward say the expected installed capacity changed to around 900 MW; the 2024 consultation booklet also presents 900 MW potential generating capacity.

source_of_record_url:
https://spioradnamara.scot/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Public-Consultation-Booklet-Digital-Version-FINAL.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6618
canonical_id: 0517438b-7f3b-4619-a30b-c02e77c21679
wind_farm_name: Spiorad na Mara
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=ml%2Fspiorad-na-mara
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate project page
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=ml%2Fspiorad-na-mara
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I found project sources confirming planned installed capacity, but no openly accessible source clearly states a separate MEC/export-capacity value. The sources reviewed discuss grid connection and installed capacity rather than a labelled MEC.


wind_farm_id: 6618
canonical_id: 0517438b-7f3b-4619-a30b-c02e77c21679
wind_farm_name: Spiorad na Mara
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Spiorad na Mara public consultation booklet
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://spioradnamara.scot/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Public-Consultation-Booklet-Digital-Version-FINAL.pdf

research_summary:
Project-specific sources discuss indicative layouts and turbine numbers, but do not identify a selected turbine model. No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided in the prompt, so the required outcome is Not confirmed rather than inferring from generic OEM platforms.


wind_farm_id: 6618
canonical_id: 0517438b-7f3b-4619-a30b-c02e77c21679
wind_farm_name: Spiorad na Mara
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Spiorad na Mara public consultation booklet
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific source found names the turbine supplier/OEM. Consultation material explicitly says turbine model availability is still changing, so OEM is not yet confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6618
canonical_id: 0517438b-7f3b-4619-a30b-c02e77c21679
wind_farm_name: Spiorad na Mara
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/appendix_i_-_consultation_representations.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate consultation representations appendix
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/appendix_i_-_consultation_representations.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The scoping-stage design envelope referenced in consultation responses mentions a range rather than a selected turbine rating, and the consultation booklet says final turbine technology remains open. No project-specific confirmed unit rating was found.


wind_farm_id: 6618
canonical_id: 0517438b-7f3b-4619-a30b-c02e77c21679
wind_farm_name: Spiorad na Mara
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/appendix_i_-_consultation_representations.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate consultation representations appendix
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/appendix_i_-_consultation_representations.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
A rotor-diameter range appears in scoping consultation material, but not a selected project turbine specification. Per the prompt rules, that is insufficient to confirm a final site-specific rotor diameter.


wind_farm_id: 6618
canonical_id: 0517438b-7f3b-4619-a30b-c02e77c21679
wind_farm_name: Spiorad na Mara
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Spiorad na Mara public consultation booklet
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The booklet gives mean wind speed at hub height but not the hub height itself, and no project-specific source found states a confirmed hub height. No EuroWindWakes fallback value was available in the prompt, so this remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6618
canonical_id: 0517438b-7f3b-4619-a30b-c02e77c21679
wind_farm_name: Spiorad na Mara
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 65 turbines
resolved_value: Up to 65 turbines
research_value: Up to 65 turbines
resolved_fact_id: 34044.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Spiorad na Mara public consultation booklet
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The latest project consultation booklet presents the current design basis as up to 65 fixed-bottom wind turbines; earlier 2023 scoping material referenced up to 66. The web-sourced figure therefore differs from the non-web validation hint of 0 and likely reflects dataset lag and early-phase status rather than a built asset count.


wind_farm_id: 6618
canonical_id: 0517438b-7f3b-4619-a30b-c02e77c21679
wind_farm_name: Spiorad na Mara
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34045.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Spiorad na Mara public consultation booklet
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Fixed-bottom; current preferred options are 3- or 4-legged jacket foundations, including piled jackets or jackets on gravity-based structures

resolved_value:
Fixed-bottom; current preferred options are 3- or 4-legged jacket foundations, including piled jackets or jackets on gravity-based structures

research_summary:
The project is explicitly described as fixed-bottom. The more specific, fresher 2024 consultation booklet says the current preferred foundation options are 3- or 4-legged jackets, either piled or on gravity bases; this is more current than the broader 2023 scoping-stage envelope.


wind_farm_id: 6618
canonical_id: 0517438b-7f3b-4619-a30b-c02e77c21679
wind_farm_name: Spiorad na Mara
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=ml%2Fspiorad-na-mara
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate project page
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=ml%2Fspiorad-na-mara
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Applications were submitted on 11/03/2026, but no grant/consent decision date was found because the project remains at application stage.


wind_farm_id: 6618
canonical_id: 0517438b-7f3b-4619-a30b-c02e77c21679
wind_farm_name: Spiorad na Mara
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Northland Power Q3 2025 results
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.northlandpower.com/en/news/press-release/northland-power-reports-third-quarter-2025-results.aspx

research_summary:
No authoritative source found states that FID has been taken. Recent company/project updates still describe development and consent-submission activity, which is pre-FID language.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.northlandpower.com/en/news/press-release/northland-power-reports-third-quarter-2025-results.aspx


wind_farm_id: 6618
canonical_id: 0517438b-7f3b-4619-a30b-c02e77c21679
wind_farm_name: Spiorad na Mara
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://spioradnamara.scot/second-phase-of-public-consultation-to-get-underway-at-spiorad-na-mara/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Spiorad na Mara second consultation announcement
source_of_record_url: https://spioradnamara.scot/second-phase-of-public-consultation-to-get-underway-at-spiorad-na-mara/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No first-power milestone exists yet in the sources reviewed; project materials still indicate future development and possible operation in 2031.


wind_farm_id: 6618
canonical_id: 0517438b-7f3b-4619-a30b-c02e77c21679
wind_farm_name: Spiorad na Mara
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Spiorad na Mara public consultation booklet
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No commissioning date is confirmed. Project materials refer only to a possible operational date around 2031, which is indicative rather than a commissioning milestone.


wind_farm_id: 6619
canonical_id: f5380b55-a612-4482-9939-d83fbac44584
wind_farm_name: MachairWind
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: MachairWind
research_value: MachairWind
citation_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/machairwind
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower Renewables project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/machairwind
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official project branding is MachairWind. ScottishPower Renewables describes it as its west-coast Scotland offshore windfarm, while Marine Directorate records the pre-application as “MachairWind Offshore Windfarm” and ties it to ScotWind W1. No clear evidence of an earlier different public project name was found.


wind_farm_id: 6619
canonical_id: f5380b55-a612-4482-9939-d83fbac44584
wind_farm_name: MachairWind
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34046.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower Summer 2025 booklet
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: ScottishPower Renewables / MachairWind Ltd; Current owner: ScottishPower Renewables (100%); Operator: Not confirmed separately

resolved_value:
Developer: ScottishPower Renewables / MachairWind Ltd; Current owner: ScottishPower Renewables (100%); Operator: Not confirmed separately

citation_url:
https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/documents/d/guest/MachairWind_Information_Booklet_Summer_2025

research_summary:
ScottishPower’s Summer 2025 consultation booklet states “MachairWind is wholly owned by ScottishPower Renewables”. Marine Directorate lists the applicant as MachairWind Ltd with ScottishPower Renewables’ Glasgow address. Freshest ownership source relied on: Summer 2025 ScottishPower booklet. No separate operator entity was confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/documents/d/guest/MachairWind_Information_Booklet_Summer_2025


wind_farm_id: 6619
canonical_id: f5380b55-a612-4482-9939-d83fbac44584
wind_farm_name: MachairWind
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.crownestatescotland.com/scotlands-property/offshore-wind/scotwind-leasing-round
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Crown Estate Scotland ScotWind leasing round
source_of_record_url: https://www.crownestatescotland.com/scotlands-property/offshore-wind/scotwind-leasing-round
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
No ownership transfer confirmed; project appears to have remained under ScottishPower Renewables since ScotWind award

research_value:
No ownership transfer confirmed; project appears to have remained under ScottishPower Renewables since ScotWind award

research_summary:
Crown Estate Scotland confirms ScotWind option agreements were offered in 01/2022 and signed in 04/2022. ScottishPower’s 2025 booklet says MachairWind is wholly owned by SPR. Freshest source date relied on for ownership continuity: Summer 2025. I found no evidence of equity sell-downs or JV restructuring for MachairWind itself.


wind_farm_id: 6619
canonical_id: f5380b55-a612-4482-9939-d83fbac44584
wind_farm_name: MachairWind
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
resolved_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
research_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
resolved_fact_id: 34047.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=node%2F25685
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate SCOP-0057
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=node%2F25685
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project has moved into pre-application scoping and consultation, but ScottishPower’s public consultation page says a marine licence application would be submitted only if MachairWind Ltd proceeds, and the consent application was still intended for 2026. Under the required Boundary Layer taxonomy, the closest exact label is Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning, because no project-specific consent application had yet been submitted.


wind_farm_id: 6619
canonical_id: f5380b55-a612-4482-9939-d83fbac44584
wind_farm_name: MachairWind
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2,000 MW
resolved_value: 2,000 MW
research_value: 2,000 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34048.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/machairwind
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower Renewables project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/machairwind
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
ScottishPower states a generating capacity of 2 Gigawatts / up to 2GW. This aligns with the database validation context.


wind_farm_id: 6619
canonical_id: f5380b55-a612-4482-9939-d83fbac44584
wind_farm_name: MachairWind
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/machairwind/the-project
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower project details page
source_of_record_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/machairwind/the-project
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I found no openly accessible project-specific source that explicitly states a named maximum export capacity / MEC value distinct from headline planned generation capacity. The available public pages discuss 2 GW project capacity and future grid connection studies, but not an explicit MEC figure.


wind_farm_id: 6619
canonical_id: f5380b55-a612-4482-9939-d83fbac44584
wind_farm_name: MachairWind
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/machairwind/the-project
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower project details page
source_of_record_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/machairwind/the-project
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
ScottishPower states it is “currently considering wind turbine options” and that detailed design is still under development. No project-specific turbine model was confirmed, and there is no linked EuroWindWakes turbine fallback in the supplied context.


wind_farm_id: 6619
canonical_id: f5380b55-a612-4482-9939-d83fbac44584
wind_farm_name: MachairWind
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/machairwind/the-project
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower project details page
source_of_record_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/machairwind/the-project
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific source identified an OEM. ScottishPower states turbine technology selection is still under consideration, so OEM would be premature to infer.


wind_farm_id: 6619
canonical_id: f5380b55-a612-4482-9939-d83fbac44584
wind_farm_name: MachairWind
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/machairwind/the-project
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower project details page
source_of_record_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/machairwind/the-project
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific web source confirmed a per-turbine rating. Because turbine count and model remain indicative only, individual rating should not be inferred from generic market norms.


wind_farm_id: 6619
canonical_id: f5380b55-a612-4482-9939-d83fbac44584
wind_farm_name: MachairWind
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/machairwind/the-project
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower project details page
source_of_record_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/machairwind/the-project
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific hub height was confirmed in accessible official or regulator sources, and none should be inferred from a generic turbine platform.


wind_farm_id: 6619
canonical_id: f5380b55-a612-4482-9939-d83fbac44584
wind_farm_name: MachairWind
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 147
resolved_value: Up to 147
research_value: Up to 147
resolved_fact_id: 34049.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower consultation milestone news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/w/machairwind-milestone-as-first-round-of-statutory-consultation-comes-to-a-close-1

research_summary:
ScottishPower’s 08/07/2025 consultation update states the windfarm development area will host “up to 147 wind turbines and foundations”. This differs from the non-web validation signals of 0 turbines because those database values appear to reflect an early-stage/pre-build dataset placeholder rather than the current design envelope.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/w/machairwind-milestone-as-first-round-of-statutory-consultation-comes-to-a-close-1


wind_farm_id: 6619
canonical_id: f5380b55-a612-4482-9939-d83fbac44584
wind_farm_name: MachairWind
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Fixed-bottom; specific subtype not confirmed
resolved_value: Fixed-bottom; specific subtype not confirmed
research_value: Fixed-bottom; specific subtype not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 34050.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/machairwind/the-project
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower project details page
source_of_record_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/machairwind/the-project
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
ScottishPower says average water depth is about 55 m and it expects to use foundations fixed to the seabed rather than floating/anchored. Public sources did not confirm a final subtype such as monopile, jacket, or gravity base.


wind_farm_id: 6619
canonical_id: f5380b55-a612-4482-9939-d83fbac44584
wind_farm_name: MachairWind
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=node%2F25685
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate SCOP-0057
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=node%2F25685
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No Section 36 or marine licence consent has been identified. Marine Directorate lists the project at Pre-application stage, and ScottishPower’s materials say the application is intended for 2026.


wind_farm_id: 6619
canonical_id: f5380b55-a612-4482-9939-d83fbac44584
wind_farm_name: MachairWind
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/pages/machairwind_timeline.aspx
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower timeline
source_of_record_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/pages/machairwind_timeline.aspx
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No first power date has been committed publicly. ScottishPower’s timeline gives only “Early 2030s First Export”, which is not a confirmed first-power milestone date.


wind_farm_id: 6619
canonical_id: f5380b55-a612-4482-9939-d83fbac44584
wind_farm_name: MachairWind
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/pages/machairwind_timeline.aspx
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower timeline
source_of_record_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/pages/machairwind_timeline.aspx
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No commissioning date has been confirmed. The project has not yet entered construction or secured consent.


wind_farm_id: 6636
canonical_id: 9f47c0f7-319a-470c-9fe7-702f64c59ed6
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg East
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Robin Rigg East
research_value: Robin Rigg East
citation_url: https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03568724
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Companies House
source_of_record_url: https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03568724
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / Crown copyright
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
RWE’s live project page confirms the wind farm comprises two phases, “Robin Rigg East and Robin Rigg West”, together known as Robin Rigg. Companies House for the East project company confirms the legal phase identity and historic naming.


wind_farm_id: 6636
canonical_id: 9f47c0f7-319a-470c-9fe7-702f64c59ed6
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg East
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34051.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://uk.rwe.com/locations/robin-rigg-east-and-west-offshore-wind-farm/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE UK project page
source_of_record_url: https://uk.rwe.com/locations/robin-rigg-east-and-west-offshore-wind-farm/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: E.ON UK / E.ON Climate & Renewables UK (historic); Current owner and operator: RWE Offshore Wind GmbH (100%)

resolved_value:
Developer: E.ON UK / E.ON Climate & Renewables UK (historic); Current owner and operator: RWE Offshore Wind GmbH (100%)

research_summary:
Freshest dated operational ownership evidence relied on is the Autumn 2025 RWE Robin Rigg newsletter, alongside RWE’s live project page stating “Robin Rigg is owned and operated by RWE Offshore Wind GmbH (100%).” Companies House shows the East phase vehicle remains active under RWE ownership lineage after the 2019 E.ON/RWE asset swap.


wind_farm_id: 6636
canonical_id: 9f47c0f7-319a-470c-9fe7-702f64c59ed6
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg East
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03568724
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Companies House
source_of_record_url: https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03568724
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / Crown copyright
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developed by E.ON; transferred into RWE in 2019 asset swap; current phase ownership presented by RWE as 100% RWE Offshore Wind GmbH

research_value:
Developed by E.ON; transferred into RWE in 2019 asset swap; current phase ownership presented by RWE as 100% RWE Offshore Wind GmbH

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on is Autumn 2025 from RWE’s newsletter for present-day project operation, with Companies House showing the name change from E.ON Climate & Renewables UK Robin Rigg East Ltd to RWE Renewables UK Robin Rigg East Ltd on 18/12/2019. RWE investor materials also list Robin Rigg East at 100% share.


wind_farm_id: 6636
canonical_id: 9f47c0f7-319a-470c-9fe7-702f64c59ed6
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg East
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 34052.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://uk.rwe.com/locations/robin-rigg-east-and-west-offshore-wind-farm/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE UK project page
source_of_record_url: https://uk.rwe.com/locations/robin-rigg-east-and-west-offshore-wind-farm/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
RWE states “Project status: In operation” for Robin Rigg East and West, and the 2025 newsletter discusses ongoing maintenance at the operating wind farm. For the East phase specifically, no evidence suggests a separate non-operational status.


wind_farm_id: 6636
canonical_id: 9f47c0f7-319a-470c-9fe7-702f64c59ed6
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg East
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 84 MW
resolved_value: 84 MW
research_value: 84 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34053.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE investor presentation
source_of_record_licence: public document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.rwe.com/-/media/RWE/documents/05-investor-relations/finanzkalendar-und-veroeffentlichungen/veroeffentlichungen-und-praesentationen/18-08-13-Creating-a-leading-renewables-player_final.pdf

research_summary:
Phase-level web sources consistently show Robin Rigg East as 84 MW. This aligns with the provided row metadata and with RWE investor material listing Robin Rigg East at 84 MW and 100% share.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.rwe.com/-/media/RWE/documents/05-investor-relations/finanzkalendar-und-veroeffentlichungen/veroeffentlichungen-und-praesentationen/18-08-13-Creating-a-leading-renewables-player_final.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6636
canonical_id: 9f47c0f7-319a-470c-9fe7-702f64c59ed6
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg East
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.transmissioncapital.com/projects/02/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Transmission Capital Robin Rigg OFTO page
source_of_record_url: https://www.transmissioncapital.com/projects/02/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Public web sources located for Robin Rigg mostly give installed capacity or OFTO asset descriptions for the combined project, not a clearly stated phase-specific MEC for Robin Rigg East. To avoid conflating gross installed capacity with export capacity, MEC is left unconfirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6636
canonical_id: 9f47c0f7-319a-470c-9fe7-702f64c59ed6
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg East
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas V90-3.0 MW Offshore
resolved_value: Vestas V90-3.0 MW Offshore
research_value: Vestas V90-3.0 MW Offshore
resolved_fact_id: 34054.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web evidence for the East phase alone is limited; combined Robin Rigg sources identify Vestas V90-3MW turbines, and the linked EuroWindWakes project turbine metadata was used as the required fallback to resolve the phase-specific specification cleanly.


wind_farm_id: 6636
canonical_id: 9f47c0f7-319a-470c-9fe7-702f64c59ed6
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg East
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas
resolved_value: Vestas
research_value: Vestas
resolved_fact_id: 9098.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Combined-project web sources confirm Vestas turbines at Robin Rigg; the linked EuroWindWakes turbine row explicitly gives OEM manufacturer Vestas for the project-linked phase metadata and is used as required fallback support.


wind_farm_id: 6636
canonical_id: 9f47c0f7-319a-470c-9fe7-702f64c59ed6
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg East
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 3
resolved_value: 3
research_value: 3 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9408.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Combined Robin Rigg project sources describe Vestas 3.0 MW turbines, and the linked EuroWindWakes row gives rated power 3 MW. This matches the 84 MW / 28 turbine phase-level configuration.


wind_farm_id: 6636
canonical_id: 9f47c0f7-319a-470c-9fe7-702f64c59ed6
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg East
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 90
resolved_value: 90
research_value: 90 m
resolved_fact_id: 9563.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web pages found did not clearly state a phase-specific rotor diameter, so the linked EuroWindWakes fallback value of 90 m was used; this is consistent with the cited V90 platform but is not inferred from a generic product brochure.


wind_farm_id: 6636
canonical_id: 9f47c0f7-319a-470c-9fe7-702f64c59ed6
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg East
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 80
resolved_value: 80
research_value: 80 m
resolved_fact_id: 9718.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources remained inconclusive on phase-specific hub height, so the linked EuroWindWakes fallback value of 80 m was used as required by the prompt. No generic turbine brochure was used to infer this.


wind_farm_id: 6636
canonical_id: 9f47c0f7-319a-470c-9fe7-702f64c59ed6
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg East
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 30
resolved_value: 30
research_value: 28
resolved_fact_id: 47103.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 30 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EnergyMap Robin Rigg East page
research_source_type: open project register mirror
research_source_url: https://www.energymap.co.uk/deccpop.asp?deccrefid=2496
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Phase-level web sources support 28 turbines for Robin Rigg East. This aligns with the authoritative row metadata and EMODnet hint, but differs from the 30 linked-location validation signal; the most likely reason is that the linked turbine-location dataset includes overlapping, outdated, or phase-allocation artefacts rather than the as-built East phase count.


wind_farm_id: 6636
canonical_id: 9f47c0f7-319a-470c-9fe7-702f64c59ed6
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg East
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile
resolved_value: Monopile
research_value: Monopile
resolved_fact_id: 34060.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.harland-wolff.com/portfolio/robin-rigg-offshore-wind-farm/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Harland & Wolff project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.harland-wolff.com/portfolio/robin-rigg-offshore-wind-farm/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific sources for Robin Rigg state foundations included monopiles and transition pieces; academic/project references on Robin Rigg’s foundation issues also describe monopile foundations.


wind_farm_id: 6636
canonical_id: 9f47c0f7-319a-470c-9fe7-702f64c59ed6
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg East
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/01/2003
resolved_value: 01/01/2003
research_value: 01/01/2003
resolved_fact_id: 34061.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://vlex.co.uk/vid/robin-rigg-offshore-wind-861211785
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: vLex UK legal text
source_of_record_url: https://vlex.co.uk/vid/robin-rigg-offshore-wind-861211785
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The accessible web evidence located ties Robin Rigg to the Robin Rigg Offshore Wind Farm (Navigation and Fishing) (Scotland) Act 2003 and shows the project as an early-2000s consented development, but the Section 36 determination PDF was not openly fetchable here. Using the year-normalisation rule, 2003 is the best-supported public date.


wind_farm_id: 6636
canonical_id: 9f47c0f7-319a-470c-9fe7-702f64c59ed6
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg East
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://uk.rwe.com/locations/robin-rigg-east-and-west-offshore-wind-farm/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE UK project page
source_of_record_url: https://uk.rwe.com/locations/robin-rigg-east-and-west-offshore-wind-farm/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible authoritative source found that clearly states a phase-specific or project-wide formal FID date for Robin Rigg. Given the age of the project and patchy archival sourcing, this is left unconfirmed rather than inferred from construction timing.


wind_farm_id: 6636
canonical_id: 9f47c0f7-319a-470c-9fe7-702f64c59ed6
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg East
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 09/09/2009
resolved_value: 09/09/2009
research_value: 09/09/2009
resolved_fact_id: 34062.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robin_Rigg_Wind_Farm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Wikipedia Robin Rigg Wind Farm
source_of_record_url: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robin_Rigg_Wind_Farm
source_of_record_licence: CC BY-SA
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Combined-project sources consistently state Robin Rigg first generated power for test purposes on 9 September 2009. No separate East-only first-power milestone was found, so the project-wide first-power date is used for the phase profile.


wind_farm_id: 6636
canonical_id: 9f47c0f7-319a-470c-9fe7-702f64c59ed6
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg East
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2010-09-01
resolved_value: 2010-09-01
research_value: 20/04/2010
resolved_fact_id: 9873.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Wikipedia Robin Rigg Wind Farm
research_source_type: encyclopedic summary
research_source_url: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robin_Rigg_Wind_Farm
research_source_licence: CC BY-SA
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
RWE states the wind farms “began full generation in April 2010,” while other project summaries specify completion on 20 April 2010. No East-only commissioning date was found, so the combined project completion date is used.


wind_farm_id: 6637
canonical_id: a62848a5-4aa4-427e-95d4-378fd57693ea
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg West
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Robin Rigg West
research_value: Robin Rigg West
citation_url: https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/our-business/marine/wind-farm-ownership
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: The Crown Estate wind farm ownership page
source_of_record_url: https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/our-business/marine/wind-farm-ownership
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
RWE’s current project page treats Robin Rigg East and West together as “Robin Rigg East and West”, while The Crown Estate ownership register lists Robin Rigg West as a separate operational project/ownership row. Historic combined name in wider project literature: Robin Rigg / Robin Rigg Offshore Wind Farm.


wind_farm_id: 6637
canonical_id: a62848a5-4aa4-427e-95d4-378fd57693ea
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg West
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34064.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://uk.rwe.com/locations/robin-rigg-east-and-west-offshore-wind-farm/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE Robin Rigg East and West project page
source_of_record_url: https://uk.rwe.com/locations/robin-rigg-east-and-west-offshore-wind-farm/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: E.ON Climate & Renewables (historic). Current owner(s): RWE Offshore Wind GmbH (100%). Operator: RWE Offshore Wind GmbH.

resolved_value:
Developer: E.ON Climate & Renewables (historic). Current owner(s): RWE Offshore Wind GmbH (100%). Operator: RWE Offshore Wind GmbH.

research_summary:
Freshest dated ownership corroboration used: Crown Estate ownership page published in 2024/2025-era live register and RWE live project page. RWE states “Robin Rigg is owned and operated by RWE Offshore Wind GmbH (100%).” Historic developer was E.ON, evidenced by E.ON 2010 reporting on completion/commissioning.


wind_farm_id: 6637
canonical_id: a62848a5-4aa4-427e-95d4-378fd57693ea
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg West
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Developed by E.ON; now 100% RWE.
research_value: Developed by E.ON; now 100% RWE.
citation_url: https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/our-business/marine/wind-farm-ownership
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: The Crown Estate wind farm ownership page
source_of_record_url: https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/our-business/marine/wind-farm-ownership
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on for current ownership: The Crown Estate ownership page published in 2024/2025-era live register confirms Robin Rigg West – 100% RWE; RWE’s live page also says Robin Rigg is “owned and operated by RWE Offshore Wind GmbH (100%).” This aligns with the post-E.ON/RWE asset reshuffle, while older sources still name E.ON.


wind_farm_id: 6637
canonical_id: a62848a5-4aa4-427e-95d4-378fd57693ea
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg West
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 34065.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://uk.rwe.com/locations/robin-rigg-east-and-west-offshore-wind-farm/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE Robin Rigg East and West project page
source_of_record_url: https://uk.rwe.com/locations/robin-rigg-east-and-west-offshore-wind-farm/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Newer authoritative sources are clear that Robin Rigg is in operation: RWE says “Project status: In operation,” and Crown Estate lists Robin Rigg West among “Fully operational projects.” For the West half specifically, the closest exact Boundary Layer label is Operational.


wind_farm_id: 6637
canonical_id: a62848a5-4aa4-427e-95d4-378fd57693ea
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg West
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 90 MW
resolved_value: 90 MW
research_value: 90 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34066.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/our-business/marine/wind-farm-ownership
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: The Crown Estate wind farm ownership page
source_of_record_url: https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/our-business/marine/wind-farm-ownership
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The researched web sources usually quote the combined Robin Rigg project at 174 MW or 180 MW. Because this task is specifically for Robin Rigg West, the project-specific half-capacity is taken as 90 MW, matching the 30-turbine west phase and the provided validation context. Combined-project web sources are included as contextual corroboration only.


wind_farm_id: 6637
canonical_id: a62848a5-4aa4-427e-95d4-378fd57693ea
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg West
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.transmissioncapital.com/projects/02/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Transmission Capital Robin Rigg page
source_of_record_url: https://www.transmissioncapital.com/projects/02/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Open web sources reviewed confirm installed capacity and transmission ownership, but no accessible authoritative source located in this pass gave a clearly project-specific MEC for Robin Rigg West as distinct from combined installed capacity/export infrastructure. To avoid conflating gross installed capacity with export rating, this remains unconfirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6637
canonical_id: a62848a5-4aa4-427e-95d4-378fd57693ea
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg West
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: V90-3.0 MW Offshore
resolved_value: V90-3.0 MW Offshore
research_value: V90-3.0 MW Offshore
resolved_fact_id: 34067.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Open web sources tie Robin Rigg to Vestas V90-3 MW turbines, but usually at combined-project level. Because this task is phase-specific and project-specific web evidence for the West half alone remained non-specific, the linked EuroWindWakes dataset value was used as the required fallback: V90-3.0 MW Offshore.


wind_farm_id: 6637
canonical_id: a62848a5-4aa4-427e-95d4-378fd57693ea
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg West
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas
resolved_value: Vestas
research_value: Vestas
resolved_fact_id: 9099.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Web sources for the combined Robin Rigg project consistently state Vestas turbines; because the phase-specific West row is being profiled and the linked turbine dataset explicitly identifies the OEM, Vestas is retained with EuroWindWakes fallback logic.


wind_farm_id: 6637
canonical_id: a62848a5-4aa4-427e-95d4-378fd57693ea
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg West
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 3
resolved_value: 3
research_value: 3 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9409.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Combined-project sources state 60 turbines at 3 MW each; because phase-specific web evidence did not separately enumerate Robin Rigg West turbine rating, the linked EuroWindWakes fallback value of 3 MW is used.


wind_farm_id: 6637
canonical_id: a62848a5-4aa4-427e-95d4-378fd57693ea
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg West
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 90
resolved_value: 90
research_value: 90 m
resolved_fact_id: 9564.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources reviewed generally identify the turbine family but not a West-specific rotor figure. Per the required fallback rule, the linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata value 90 m is used. This is also consistent with the V90 designation, but the chosen value is grounded in the linked dataset fallback rather than inferred from the model name.


wind_farm_id: 6637
canonical_id: a62848a5-4aa4-427e-95d4-378fd57693ea
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg West
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 80
resolved_value: 80
research_value: 80 m
resolved_fact_id: 9719.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific open web evidence for Robin Rigg West hub height was inconclusive. Under the mandatory fallback rule, the linked EuroWindWakes project turbine metadata value 80 m is used explicitly as dataset fallback rather than inferred from a generic turbine page.


wind_farm_id: 6637
canonical_id: a62848a5-4aa4-427e-95d4-378fd57693ea
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg West
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 30
resolved_value: 30
research_value: 30
resolved_fact_id: 47104.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 30 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: The Crown Estate wind farm ownership page
research_source_type: owner/regulator webpage
research_source_url: https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/our-business/marine/wind-farm-ownership
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
The West phase is listed in the validation context as 30 turbines, aligning with the linked-turbine count and EMODnet hint. Public web sources mostly discuss the combined project at 60 turbines, and Crown Estate lists Robin Rigg West as a separate ownership row. The chosen 30-turbine figure therefore aligns with the non-web validation signals and with the East/West split.


wind_farm_id: 6637
canonical_id: a62848a5-4aa4-427e-95d4-378fd57693ea
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg West
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile
resolved_value: Monopile
research_value: Monopile
resolved_fact_id: 34073.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Crown Estate Scotland sector profile PDF
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://crownestatescotland.com/sites/default/files/2023-11/OSW-factsheet-web-sept23-sector-profile.pdf

research_summary:
This is well supported in authoritative/open sources at combined Robin Rigg level: Crown Estate Scotland’s sector factsheet lists Robin Rigg (East and West) foundation type as Monopile, and other technical summaries agree. No evidence suggests West differed from East on foundation concept.

source_of_record_url:
https://crownestatescotland.com/sites/default/files/2023-11/OSW-factsheet-web-sept23-sector-profile.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6637
canonical_id: a62848a5-4aa4-427e-95d4-378fd57693ea
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg West
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 16/03/2004
resolved_value: 16/03/2004
research_value: 16/03/2004
resolved_fact_id: 34074.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.parliament.scot/api/sitecore/CustomMedia/OfficialReport?meetingId=741
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Scottish Parliament Official Report
source_of_record_url: https://www.parliament.scot/api/sitecore/CustomMedia/OfficialReport?meetingId=741
source_of_record_licence: public webpage/PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The repaired source chain replaces the failed determination-PDF evidence with accessible Scottish Parliament and Scottish Government pages. The Scottish Parliament Official Report on 30 March 2004 states that “consent is in place” for Robin Rigg, and Marine Scotland’s consent-application record provides the project-specific Section 36 consent entry. Taken together, these support a consent date of 16 March 2004 without relying on the blocked PDF quote.


wind_farm_id: 6637
canonical_id: a62848a5-4aa4-427e-95d4-378fd57693ea
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg West
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.power-technology.com/projects/robinriggwind/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Power Technology Robin Rigg page
source_of_record_url: https://www.power-technology.com/projects/robinriggwind/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No openly accessible authoritative source reviewed in this pass gave a clear, machine-checkable FID date for Robin Rigg West or the combined Robin Rigg project. Rather than infer FID from contract award or construction start, this remains unconfirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6637
canonical_id: a62848a5-4aa4-427e-95d4-378fd57693ea
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg West
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 09/09/2009
resolved_value: 09/09/2009
research_value: 09/09/2009
resolved_fact_id: 34075.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.nsenergybusiness.com/news/newseons_robin_rigg_starts_generating_electricity_090909/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: NS Energy first-power article
source_of_record_url: https://www.nsenergybusiness.com/news/newseons_robin_rigg_starts_generating_electricity_090909/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Secondary but consistent project histories state Robin Rigg “first generated power for test purposes on 9 September 2009.” No stronger open official page with the exact first-power date was found, so this date is used with cautious confidence.


wind_farm_id: 6637
canonical_id: a62848a5-4aa4-427e-95d4-378fd57693ea
wind_farm_name: Robin Rigg West
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2010-09-01
resolved_value: 2010-09-01
research_value: 20/04/2010
resolved_fact_id: 9874.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: RWE Robin Rigg East and West project page
research_source_type: official owner/operator webpage
research_source_url: https://uk.rwe.com/locations/robin-rigg-east-and-west-offshore-wind-farm/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
The repaired row replaces the empty PDF with accessible owner/operator and historic company evidence. RWE’s live project page says the wind farms “began full generation in April 2010,” and E.ON’s 2010 corporate responsibility report says “We completed wind farms at Robin Rigg (180 MW)” in 2010. Using the exact date already carried in the report and consistent with those sources, 20/04/2010 is retained as the full commissioning date.


wind_farm_id: 6639
canonical_id: b1fa5dd5-3e5d-4dbd-b864-2b8770f5b516
wind_farm_name: Northwind
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Northwind offshore wind farm; historic name: Eldepasco
research_value: Northwind offshore wind farm; historic name: Eldepasco
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: European Investment Bank press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.eib.org/en/press/all/2012-090-eib-financing-of-eur-333-million-for-northwind-offshore-wind-power-plant

research_summary:
Project-specific sources identify the asset as Northwind in Belgian offshore waters; the historic name Eldepasco is confirmed by EIB project material and the 2012 financial-close announcement.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.eib.org/en/press/all/2012-090-eib-financing-of-eur-333-million-for-northwind-offshore-wind-power-plant


wind_farm_id: 6639
canonical_id: b1fa5dd5-3e5d-4dbd-b864-2b8770f5b516
wind_farm_name: Northwind
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 36418.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.aspiravi.com/en/anchoring-northwind/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Aspiravi press release
source_of_record_url: https://www.aspiravi.com/en/anchoring-northwind/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developed by Northwind NV / Parkwind-led consortium; current owners: Aspiravi Offshore 70%, Sumitomo Corporation 30%; operator/O&M manager: Parkwind

resolved_value:
Developed by Northwind NV / Parkwind-led consortium; current owners: Aspiravi Offshore 70%, Sumitomo Corporation 30%; operator/O&M manager: Parkwind

research_summary:
Freshest ownership evidence is Aspiravi press release dated 19/03/2024, confirming Aspiravi increased to 70% and Sumitomo retained 30%. Parkwind’s current project page states that since March 2024 the farm is jointly owned by Aspiravi Offshore and Sumitomo, with Parkwind continuing to manage operations and maintenance.


wind_farm_id: 6639
canonical_id: b1fa5dd5-3e5d-4dbd-b864-2b8770f5b516
wind_farm_name: Northwind
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.aspiravi.com/en/anchoring-northwind/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Aspiravi press release
source_of_record_url: https://www.aspiravi.com/en/anchoring-northwind/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Initially developed under Eldepasco/Northwind with Parkwind/Aspiravi involvement; by 10/2014 Sumitomo acquired 30%; from 19/03/2024 ownership became Aspiravi Offshore 70% and Sumitomo 30% after Parkwind sale

research_value:
Initially developed under Eldepasco/Northwind with Parkwind/Aspiravi involvement; by 10/2014 Sumitomo acquired 30%; from 19/03/2024 ownership became Aspiravi Offshore 70% and Sumitomo 30% after Parkwind sale

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on is 19/03/2024 from Aspiravi. Earlier ownership change is supported by 2014 reporting that Sumitomo acquired 30% from Parkwind, while Parkwind’s current page confirms Parkwind is now operator rather than equity owner.


wind_farm_id: 6639
canonical_id: b1fa5dd5-3e5d-4dbd-b864-2b8770f5b516
wind_farm_name: Northwind
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 36419.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.belgianoffshoreplatform.be/en/projects/northwind/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Belgian Offshore Platform project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.belgianoffshoreplatform.be/en/projects/northwind/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Multiple current project pages state the turbines are operational and have produced power since 2014; this matches the database validation context.


wind_farm_id: 6639
canonical_id: b1fa5dd5-3e5d-4dbd-b864-2b8770f5b516
wind_farm_name: Northwind
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 216 MW
resolved_value: 216 MW
research_value: 216 MW
resolved_fact_id: 36421.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.isc.dk/en/projects/north-wind
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ISC Consulting Engineers project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.isc.dk/en/projects/north-wind
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific open web evidence for a formally labeled MEC figure is limited. Northwind’s offshore substation and project capacity are both stated as 216 MW in project engineering references, so 216 MW is the best-supported export figure; however, most sources describe installed/substation capacity rather than explicitly using the term MEC.


wind_farm_id: 6639
canonical_id: b1fa5dd5-3e5d-4dbd-b864-2b8770f5b516
wind_farm_name: Northwind
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas V112-3.0 MW Offshore
resolved_value: Vestas V112-3.0 MW Offshore
research_value: Vestas V112-3.0 MW Offshore
resolved_fact_id: 36422.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vestas order announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.vestas.com/en/media/company-news/2012/vestas-receives-216-mw-offshore-order-in-belgium-c2964287

research_summary:
Vestas’ project-specific order announcement explicitly states 72 × V112-3.0 MW. This aligns with linked EuroWindWakes metadata, so no generic turbine-page inference was needed.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.vestas.com/en/media/company-news/2012/vestas-receives-216-mw-offshore-order-in-belgium-c2964287


wind_farm_id: 6639
canonical_id: b1fa5dd5-3e5d-4dbd-b864-2b8770f5b516
wind_farm_name: Northwind
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas
resolved_value: Vestas
research_value: Vestas
resolved_fact_id: 9100.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Vestas order announcement
research_source_type: OEM
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
OEM is explicitly tied to Northwind by Vestas and corroborated by Belgian offshore industry sources.

research_source_url:
https://www.vestas.com/en/media/company-news/2012/vestas-receives-216-mw-offshore-order-in-belgium-c2964287


wind_farm_id: 6639
canonical_id: b1fa5dd5-3e5d-4dbd-b864-2b8770f5b516
wind_farm_name: Northwind
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 3
resolved_value: 3
research_value: 3 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9410.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Vestas order announcement
research_source_type: OEM
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific Vestas order announcement states V112-3.0 MW turbines; this also aligns with EuroWindWakes linked turbine metadata.


wind_farm_id: 6639
canonical_id: b1fa5dd5-3e5d-4dbd-b864-2b8770f5b516
wind_farm_name: Northwind
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 112
resolved_value: 112
research_value: 112 m
resolved_fact_id: 9565.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Belgian Offshore Platform project page
research_source_type: industry association project page
research_source_url: https://www.belgianoffshoreplatform.be/en/projects/northwind/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Belgian Offshore Platform gives rotor diameter 112 m for Northwind; this matches the project-specific V112 model evidence and the linked EuroWindWakes fallback value.


wind_farm_id: 6639
canonical_id: b1fa5dd5-3e5d-4dbd-b864-2b8770f5b516
wind_farm_name: Northwind
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 71
resolved_value: 71
research_value: 71 m
resolved_fact_id: 9720.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Public project pages usually give total turbine height (127 m), not hub height. Because project-specific web evidence for hub height remained inconclusive, the linked EuroWindWakes 2025 turbine metadata was used as the required fallback: 71 m. Belgian Offshore Platform’s 127 m total height is directionally consistent with a 71 m hub and 112 m rotor.


wind_farm_id: 6639
canonical_id: b1fa5dd5-3e5d-4dbd-b864-2b8770f5b516
wind_farm_name: Northwind
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 72
resolved_value: 72
research_value: 72
resolved_fact_id: 48162.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 72 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Parkwind project page
research_source_type: operator
research_source_url: https://parkwind.eu/projects/northwind
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Count is explicitly stated by owner/operator and OEM sources and aligns with the non-web validation signals from EuroWindWakes and EMODnet, all of which point to 72.


wind_farm_id: 6639
canonical_id: b1fa5dd5-3e5d-4dbd-b864-2b8770f5b516
wind_farm_name: Northwind
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile
resolved_value: Monopile
research_value: Monopile
resolved_fact_id: 36428.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.belgianoffshoreplatform.be/en/projects/northwind/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Belgian Offshore Platform project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.belgianoffshoreplatform.be/en/projects/northwind/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific sources consistently state monopile foundations. GeoSea’s contract covered 73 steel monopiles and transition pieces for turbines plus transformer station, corroborating monopile as the as-built foundation concept.


wind_farm_id: 6639
canonical_id: b1fa5dd5-3e5d-4dbd-b864-2b8770f5b516
wind_farm_name: Northwind
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 08/02/2013
resolved_value: 08/02/2013
research_value: 08/02/2013
resolved_fact_id: 36429.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.ospar.org/ospar-data/p00627_wind-farms%20update.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: OSPAR database on offshore wind-farms update
source_of_record_url: https://www.ospar.org/ospar-data/p00627_wind-farms%20update.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Open, authoritative confirmation is harder to access directly, but the OSPAR offshore wind-farms update states the environmental permit was granted on 8/2/2013. EIB project material independently confirms the project underwent EIA/permitting, though it does not show the exact permit date on-page.


wind_farm_id: 6639
canonical_id: b1fa5dd5-3e5d-4dbd-b864-2b8770f5b516
wind_farm_name: Northwind
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 28/06/2012
resolved_value: 28/06/2012
research_value: 28/06/2012
resolved_fact_id: 36430.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://green-giraffe.com/publication/news/northwind-reaches-financial-close/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Green Giraffe Advisory transaction news
source_of_record_url: https://green-giraffe.com/publication/news/northwind-reaches-financial-close/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Financial close on 28/06/2012 is the clearest accessible project milestone corresponding to FID/pre-construction commitment. EIB and Green Giraffe both report financial close at the end of June 2012; using 28/06/2012 reflects the dated project company announcement route cited by EIB and Green Giraffe.


wind_farm_id: 6639
canonical_id: b1fa5dd5-3e5d-4dbd-b864-2b8770f5b516
wind_farm_name: Northwind
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/01/2014
resolved_value: 01/01/2014
research_value: 01/01/2014
resolved_fact_id: 36431.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.belgianoffshoreplatform.be/en/projects/northwind/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Belgian Offshore Platform project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.belgianoffshoreplatform.be/en/projects/northwind/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
A precise first-export date was not clearly confirmed from accessible authoritative pages. Current owner/project pages confirm the farm has been producing green energy since 2014, so the table uses the normalized year-only date rule.


wind_farm_id: 6639
canonical_id: b1fa5dd5-3e5d-4dbd-b864-2b8770f5b516
wind_farm_name: Northwind
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2014-06-01
resolved_value: 2014-06-01
research_value: 01/06/2014
resolved_fact_id: 9875.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Vestas order announcement
research_source_type: OEM
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Vestas’ project-specific order announcement says the project was “expected commissioned in Q2 2014”; current owner/project pages state operational in 2014. Using the month-normalized date 01/06/2014 best reflects Q2 2014 commissioning.


wind_farm_id: 6642
canonical_id: 1daacb61-9b14-4171-bae4-c8ea24029897
wind_farm_name: Inch Cape Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.inchcapewind.com/about/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Inch Cape About
source_of_record_url: https://www.inchcapewind.com/about/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Inch Cape Offshore Wind Farm; historic/relevant names: Inch Cape Offshore Windfarm (Revised Design), Inch Cape Offshore Limited (project company)

research_value:
Inch Cape Offshore Wind Farm; historic/relevant names: Inch Cape Offshore Windfarm (Revised Design), Inch Cape Offshore Limited (project company)

research_summary:
The live project website uses Inch Cape Offshore Wind Farm. Marine Scotland documentation for the active consented scheme uses Inch Cape Offshore Windfarm (Revised Design), which is the relevant phase for the project now being built.


wind_farm_id: 6642
canonical_id: 1daacb61-9b14-4171-bae4-c8ea24029897
wind_farm_name: Inch Cape Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34077.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.inchcapewind.com/about/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Inch Cape About
source_of_record_url: https://www.inchcapewind.com/about/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer and project company: Inch Cape Offshore Limited (ICOL); current owners: ESB 50% and Red Rock Renewables 50%; operator: Not confirmed separately from owners/project company

resolved_value:
Developer and project company: Inch Cape Offshore Limited (ICOL); current owners: ESB 50% and Red Rock Renewables 50%; operator: Not confirmed separately from owners/project company

research_summary:
Freshest ownership source used is the project website page crawled recently and the dated project press release of 27/01/2025, both stating ICOL is an equal joint venture between ESB and Red Rock Renewables. The site says the project will be operated and maintained from Montrose, but no separate long-term asset operator entity is explicitly named, so operator is left Not confirmed separately.


wind_farm_id: 6642
canonical_id: 1daacb61-9b14-4171-bae4-c8ea24029897
wind_farm_name: Inch Cape Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.inchcapewind.com/inch-cape-signs-agreement-with-see-energy-markets/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: JV formation announcement
source_of_record_url: https://www.inchcapewind.com/inch-cape-signs-agreement-with-see-energy-markets/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Originally developed by ICOL/Red Rock predecessor interests; ESB acquired a 50% share in 2020; current ownership remains ESB 50% / Red Rock Renewables 50%

research_value:
Originally developed by ICOL/Red Rock predecessor interests; ESB acquired a 50% share in 2020; current ownership remains ESB 50% / Red Rock Renewables 50%

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on for current structure is 27/01/2025 confirming equal joint ownership. Ownership history is corroborated by the 09/11/2020 announcement that Red Rock formed a 50:50 joint venture with ESB for Inch Cape Offshore Limited.


wind_farm_id: 6642
canonical_id: 1daacb61-9b14-4171-bae4-c8ea24029897
wind_farm_name: Inch Cape Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Under Construction
resolved_value: Under Construction
research_value: Under Construction
resolved_fact_id: 34078.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.inchcapewind.com/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Inch Cape home page
source_of_record_url: https://www.inchcapewind.com/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Multiple current sources explicitly say the project is now under construction / in its offshore construction phase. This best matches the Boundary Layer status Under Construction.


wind_farm_id: 6642
canonical_id: 1daacb61-9b14-4171-bae4-c8ea24029897
wind_farm_name: Inch Cape Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1080 MW
resolved_value: 1080 MW
research_value: 1080 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34079.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vestas order announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.vestas.com/en/media/company-news/2024/vestas-wins-1-1-gw-order-for-the-inch-cape-offshore-win-c4083665

research_summary:
Current project sources consistently describe Inch Cape as a 1.1 GW / 1080 MW project with 72 turbines. This is the revised design now being constructed, rather than the older lower-capacity consent history.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.vestas.com/en/media/company-news/2024/vestas-wins-1-1-gw-order-for-the-inch-cape-offshore-win-c4083665


wind_farm_id: 6642
canonical_id: 1daacb61-9b14-4171-bae4-c8ea24029897
wind_farm_name: Inch Cape Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.inchcapewind.com/about/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Inch Cape About
source_of_record_url: https://www.inchcapewind.com/about/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I found clear evidence for installed capacity and for the historical generation cap changes, but not a clearly stated current maximum export capacity / MEC in an accessible authoritative source for the as-built project. Older planning material references a 700 MW grid connection context, while later project pages describe a 1.1 GW wind farm and 220 kV export system; because gross capacity and MEC should not be conflated, MEC is left Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6642
canonical_id: 1daacb61-9b14-4171-bae4-c8ea24029897
wind_farm_name: Inch Cape Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas
resolved_value: Vestas
research_value: Vestas
resolved_fact_id: 34081.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vestas order announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Both the OEM announcement and project materials explicitly identify Vestas as turbine supplier for Inch Cape.


wind_farm_id: 6642
canonical_id: 1daacb61-9b14-4171-bae4-c8ea24029897
wind_farm_name: Inch Cape Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 236 m
resolved_value: 236 m
research_value: 236 m
resolved_fact_id: 34083.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Scotland safety zone application
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/inch_cape_offshore_limited_-_safety_zone_application.pdf

research_summary:
Marine Scotland’s project-specific safety-zone and DSLP snippets both explicitly tie a 236 m rotor diameter to Inch Cape’s final design turbines.

source_of_record_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/inch_cape_offshore_limited_-_safety_zone_application.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6642
canonical_id: 1daacb61-9b14-4171-bae4-c8ea24029897
wind_farm_name: Inch Cape Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 155.6 m to 159.9 m above LAT
resolved_value: 155.6 m to 159.9 m above LAT
research_value: 155.6 m to 159.9 m above LAT
resolved_fact_id: 34084.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Scotland DSLP snippet
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/ic02-int-ofc-006-inc-pla-001_inch_cape_development_specification_and_layout_plan_dslp_rev_1.pdf

research_summary:
Project-specific Marine Scotland DSLP snippet explicitly gives height to hub (above LAT) as 155.6 m for monopiles/TPs and 159.9 m for jacket foundations. Because the project uses both foundation types, a range is the most accurate project-specific value.

source_of_record_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/ic02-int-ofc-006-inc-pla-001_inch_cape_development_specification_and_layout_plan_dslp_rev_1.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6642
canonical_id: 1daacb61-9b14-4171-bae4-c8ea24029897
wind_farm_name: Inch Cape Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 72
resolved_value: 72
research_value: 72
resolved_fact_id: 34085.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.inchcapewind.com/about/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Inch Cape About
source_of_record_url: https://www.inchcapewind.com/about/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current authoritative project sources consistently state 72 turbines for the revised design under construction. This differs from the database validation hint of 110, which aligns with the older 2014 consented concept rather than the revised design approved in 2019 and built today.


wind_farm_id: 6642
canonical_id: 1daacb61-9b14-4171-bae4-c8ea24029897
wind_farm_name: Inch Cape Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Mixed monopile and jacket foundations
resolved_value: Mixed monopile and jacket foundations
research_value: Mixed monopile and jacket foundations
resolved_fact_id: 34086.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Inch Cape financial close press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.inchcapewind.com/scottish-flagship-offshore-wind-project-inch-cape-reaches-financial-close/

research_summary:
Current project and supplier sources explicitly state a mix of monopile and jacket foundations. More detailed recent reporting says 54 monopiles and 18 jackets, but for the field requested the project-level foundation type is mixed monopile/jacket.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.inchcapewind.com/scottish-flagship-offshore-wind-project-inch-cape-reaches-financial-close/


wind_farm_id: 6642
canonical_id: 1daacb61-9b14-4171-bae4-c8ea24029897
wind_farm_name: Inch Cape Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 17/06/2019
resolved_value: 17/06/2019
research_value: 17/06/2019
resolved_fact_id: 34087.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Scotland Section 36 project page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/ml/section-36-consent-construction-and-operation-offshore-windfarm-and-transmission-works-inch-cape

research_summary:
The relevant active revised-design consent appears on the Marine Scotland project page with determination/licence dated 17/06/2019. The project also notes an original consent in 2014, but the current under-construction scheme is the revised design.

source_of_record_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/ml/section-36-consent-construction-and-operation-offshore-windfarm-and-transmission-works-inch-cape


wind_farm_id: 6642
canonical_id: 1daacb61-9b14-4171-bae4-c8ea24029897
wind_farm_name: Inch Cape Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 27/01/2025
resolved_value: 27/01/2025
research_value: 27/01/2025
resolved_fact_id: 34088.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Inch Cape financial close press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.inchcapewind.com/scottish-flagship-offshore-wind-project-inch-cape-reaches-financial-close/

research_summary:
The dated financial-close announcement on 27/01/2025 is the clearest accessible proxy for FID; it states the project has reached financial close and moved into construction. I therefore use that as the FID date.


wind_farm_id: 6642
canonical_id: 1daacb61-9b14-4171-bae4-c8ea24029897
wind_farm_name: Inch Cape Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/10/2026
resolved_value: 01/10/2026
research_value: 01/10/2026
resolved_fact_id: 34089.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Inch Cape financial close press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The clearest current project-specific wording is “First power is expected in late-2026”. Per the normalization rule for partial dates, this is recorded as 01/10/2026 and noted as month-level approximation for late-2026 guidance.


wind_farm_id: 6642
canonical_id: 1daacb61-9b14-4171-bae4-c8ea24029897
wind_farm_name: Inch Cape Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/07/2027
resolved_value: 01/07/2027
research_value: 01/07/2027
resolved_fact_id: 34090.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.inchcapewind.com/about/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Inch Cape About
source_of_record_url: https://www.inchcapewind.com/about/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current project sources say the wind farm is expected to be fully operational in 2027 and that by mid-2027 all 72 turbines will be installed and commissioned. I therefore normalize full commissioning to 01/07/2027 as the best month-level representation of “mid-2027.”


wind_farm_id: 6646
canonical_id: c4a03cff-ea8f-4c98-93b9-65aae204fe26
wind_farm_name: Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm; historic related name: Beatrice Offshore Windfarm Ltd (BOWL) project
research_value: Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm; historic related name: Beatrice Offshore Windfarm Ltd (BOWL) project
citation_url: https://www.sserenewables.com/offshore-wind/operational-wind-farms/beatrice/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SSE Renewables Beatrice page
source_of_record_url: https://www.sserenewables.com/offshore-wind/operational-wind-farms/beatrice/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official project and SSE pages consistently use Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm / Beatrice Offshore Windfarm Ltd for the operational 588 MW project. Beatrice’s history page also distinguishes it from the earlier 2007 two-turbine demonstrator.


wind_farm_id: 6646
canonical_id: c4a03cff-ea8f-4c98-93b9-65aae204fe26
wind_farm_name: Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 9955.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.beatricewind.com/about/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Beatrice official about page
source_of_record_url: https://www.beatricewind.com/about/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 1
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: SSE Renewables-led JV. Current owners: SSE Renewables 40%; Red Rock Renewables 25%; TRIG 17.5%; Equitix 17.5%. Operator: SSE Renewables

resolved_value:
Developer: SSE Renewables-led JV. Current owners: SSE Renewables 40%; Red Rock Renewables 25%; TRIG 17.5%; Equitix 17.5%. Operator: SSE Renewables

research_summary:
Current ownership split reconciles to 100% on the official Beatrice project about page and is also confirmed by current owner pages. Freshest dated source relied on for current ownership is SSE material published in 2024 confirming SSE 40%, Red Rock 25%, TRIG 17.5%, Equitix 17.5%; SSE’s current portfolio page also confirms SSE operates the asset on behalf of the JV.


wind_farm_id: 6646
canonical_id: c4a03cff-ea8f-4c98-93b9-65aae204fe26
wind_farm_name: Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.trig-ltd.com/news-media/news/uk-offshore-wind-acquisitions/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: TRIG acquisition announcement
source_of_record_url: https://www.trig-ltd.com/news-media/news/uk-offshore-wind-acquisitions/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Initial development JV: SSE Renewables / Repsol Nuevas Energias UK (later SeaEnergy also referenced in seabed development history). At financial close in 05/2016: SSE 40%, CIP 35%, SDIC Power (now Red Rock Renewables) 25%. Since 01/2021: SSE 40%, Red Rock 25%, TRIG 17.5%, Equitix 17.5%

research_value:
Initial development JV: SSE Renewables / Repsol Nuevas Energias UK (later SeaEnergy also referenced in seabed development history). At financial close in 05/2016: SSE 40%, CIP 35%, SDIC Power (now Red Rock Renewables) 25%. Since 01/2021: SSE 40%, Red Rock 25%, TRIG 17.5%, Equitix 17.5%

research_summary:
Ownership evolved from early SSE-Repsol development, to SSE/CIP/SDIC at 2016 financial close, then CIP sold its 35% in 2021 to TRIG and Equitix (17.5% each). Freshest source relied on for the present structure is the official project/SSE material; for the 2021 transfer, TRIG and Orrick announcements clearly state the transaction.


wind_farm_id: 6646
canonical_id: c4a03cff-ea8f-4c98-93b9-65aae204fe26
wind_farm_name: Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 9956.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.beatricewind.com/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Beatrice official home page
source_of_record_url: https://www.beatricewind.com/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official Beatrice and SSE portfolio pages both state the wind farm became fully operational in 06/2019 and is operated from Wick Harbour. This aligns with the validation context status.


wind_farm_id: 6646
canonical_id: c4a03cff-ea8f-4c98-93b9-65aae204fe26
wind_farm_name: Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 588 MW
resolved_value: 588 MW
research_value: 588 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9957.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.beatricewind.com/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Beatrice official home page
source_of_record_url: https://www.beatricewind.com/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Capacity is consistently stated as 588 MW by the official project website, SSE, and Marine Scotland documents.


wind_farm_id: 6646
canonical_id: c4a03cff-ea8f-4c98-93b9-65aae204fe26
wind_farm_name: Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 588 MW
resolved_value: 588 MW
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 21515.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.beatricewind.com/offshore
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Beatrice offshore page
source_of_record_url: https://www.beatricewind.com/offshore
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Open official sources clearly confirm installed capacity 588 MW and 220 kV export system, but I did not find an openly accessible source that explicitly labels a project MEC value for Beatrice. To avoid conflating installed capacity with export system rating, this remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6646
canonical_id: c4a03cff-ea8f-4c98-93b9-65aae204fe26
wind_farm_name: Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: SWT-7.0-154
resolved_value: SWT-7.0-154
research_value: SWT-7.0-154
resolved_fact_id: 9959.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Scotland O&M programme
source_of_record_licence: public sector / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/operation_and_maintenance_programme_wind_farm_assets_2024_redacted.pdf

research_summary:
Project-specific web evidence confirms 84 Siemens SWT-7.0-154 WTGs in Marine Scotland’s O&M document; this also matches the linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata fallback.

source_of_record_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/operation_and_maintenance_programme_wind_farm_assets_2024_redacted.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6646
canonical_id: c4a03cff-ea8f-4c98-93b9-65aae204fe26
wind_farm_name: Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens Gamesa
resolved_value: Siemens Gamesa
research_value: Siemens Gamesa
resolved_fact_id: 9102.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Beatrice official home page
research_source_type: official project webpage
research_source_url: https://www.beatricewind.com/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Official project pages repeatedly describe the installed units as Siemens Gamesa 7 MW turbines. This matches the linked EuroWindWakes fallback.


wind_farm_id: 6646
canonical_id: c4a03cff-ea8f-4c98-93b9-65aae204fe26
wind_farm_name: Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 7
resolved_value: 7
research_value: 7 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9412.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Beatrice official about page
research_source_type: official project webpage
research_source_url: https://www.beatricewind.com/about/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Official project pages and Marine Scotland documentation confirm 7 MW turbines; this aligns with the linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata fallback.


wind_farm_id: 6646
canonical_id: c4a03cff-ea8f-4c98-93b9-65aae204fe26
wind_farm_name: Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 154
resolved_value: 154
research_value: 154 m
resolved_fact_id: 9567.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Construction Method Statement (Tethys mirror of project document)
research_source_type: project document mirror
research_source_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/sites/default/files/publications/ConstructionMethodStatement.pdf
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 1
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Marine Scotland’s O&M programme confirms maximum rotor diameter 154 m for the constructed project. This also matches the linked EuroWindWakes fallback.


wind_farm_id: 6646
canonical_id: c4a03cff-ea8f-4c98-93b9-65aae204fe26
wind_farm_name: Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 101
resolved_value: 101
research_value: 101 m
resolved_fact_id: 9722.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 1
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific accessible web sources were inconclusive/conflicting for as-built hub height; Marine Scotland construction documents surfaced a broader/higher design value context rather than a clean final project fact. Per instruction, the linked EuroWindWakes 2025 project-turbine metadata was used as the required fallback for hub height: 101 m.


wind_farm_id: 6646
canonical_id: c4a03cff-ea8f-4c98-93b9-65aae204fe26
wind_farm_name: Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 84
resolved_value: 84
research_value: 84
resolved_fact_id: 47107.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 84 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Beatrice official home page
research_source_type: official project webpage
research_source_url: https://www.beatricewind.com/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Official Beatrice, SSE, and Marine Scotland sources all confirm 84 turbines. This aligns with the non-web validation signals: database winner candidate 84, EuroWindWakes linked turbine count 84, and EMODnet hint 84.


wind_farm_id: 6646
canonical_id: c4a03cff-ea8f-4c98-93b9-65aae204fe26
wind_farm_name: Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Jacket foundations
resolved_value: Jacket foundations
research_value: Jacket foundations
resolved_fact_id: 9965.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Scotland O&M programme
source_of_record_licence: public sector / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/operation_and_maintenance_programme_wind_farm_assets_2024_redacted.pdf

research_summary:
Official project pages state jackets were used; Marine Scotland’s O&M programme confirms jacket substructures on four pile foundations.


wind_farm_id: 6646
canonical_id: c4a03cff-ea8f-4c98-93b9-65aae204fe26
wind_farm_name: Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 19/03/2014
resolved_value: 19/03/2014
research_value: 19/03/2014
resolved_fact_id: 9966.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SSE consent announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.sse.com/news-and-views/2014/03/scottish-government-consents-beatrice-offshore-wind-farm/

research_summary:
SSE’s consent announcement and Marine Scotland’s later O&M document both identify the Section 36 / Section 36A consent date as 19 March 2014.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.sse.com/news-and-views/2014/03/scottish-government-consents-beatrice-offshore-wind-farm/


wind_farm_id: 6646
canonical_id: c4a03cff-ea8f-4c98-93b9-65aae204fe26
wind_farm_name: Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/05/2016
resolved_value: 01/05/2016
research_value: 01/05/2016
resolved_fact_id: 9967.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.beatricewind.com/history
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Beatrice history page
source_of_record_url: https://www.beatricewind.com/history
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official project history states financial close in May 2016 gave the green light for construction; SSE’s 23/05/2016 announcement is the dated public confirmation of that decision. Using the normalization rule for month-only evidence, the table date is 01/05/2016.


wind_farm_id: 6646
canonical_id: c4a03cff-ea8f-4c98-93b9-65aae204fe26
wind_farm_name: Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 19/07/2018
resolved_value: 19/07/2018
research_value: 19/07/2018
resolved_fact_id: 9968.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.beatricewind.com/offshore
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Beatrice offshore page
source_of_record_url: https://www.beatricewind.com/offshore
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official Beatrice first-power announcement and offshore page both confirm first power export on 19 July 2018.


wind_farm_id: 6646
canonical_id: c4a03cff-ea8f-4c98-93b9-65aae204fe26
wind_farm_name: Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2019-06-01
resolved_value: 2019-06-01
research_value: 01/06/2019
resolved_fact_id: 21186.0
resolved_source_type: community
resolved_source_name: Community approved
resolved_source_detail: approved community correction #1
citation_url: https://www.beatricewind.com/history
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Community approved
source_of_record_url: https://www.beatricewind.com/history
research_source_name: Beatrice official home page
research_source_type: official project webpage
research_source_url: https://www.beatricewind.com/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: community
community_approved_note_count: 1
community_correction_count: 1
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
research_summary:
Official Beatrice and SSE pages state the wind farm became fully operational in June 2019; applying the normalization rule gives 01/06/2019. Marine Scotland’s O&M documentation also distinguishes the period up to full commissioning from later operational documents.


wind_farm_id: 6647
canonical_id: 3af987cc-ea1d-437a-9356-1ea3230f3414
wind_farm_name: Aberdeen Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Aberdeen Offshore Wind Farm (also known as European Offshore Wind Deployment Centre, EOWDC)
research_value: Aberdeen Offshore Wind Farm (also known as European Offshore Wind Deployment Centre, EOWDC)
citation_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/aberdeen/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall power plant page
source_of_record_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/aberdeen/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific sources consistently describe the operational asset as “Aberdeen Offshore Wind Farm” and “European Offshore Wind Deployment Centre (EOWDC)”. The 2016 design statement and later Marine Scotland/Vattenfall pages use both names for the same built project.


wind_farm_id: 6647
canonical_id: 3af987cc-ea1d-437a-9356-1ea3230f3414
wind_farm_name: Aberdeen Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34109.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/00535489.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Scotland post-consent project document
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/00535489.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public sector information
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Aberdeen Offshore Wind Farm Ltd / Vattenfall group; Current owner: Vattenfall (100%); Operator: Vattenfall

resolved_value:
Developer: Aberdeen Offshore Wind Farm Ltd / Vattenfall group; Current owner: Vattenfall (100%); Operator: Vattenfall

research_summary:
Freshest ownership evidence used is a Marine Scotland post-consent document published last month stating AOWFL is “wholly owned by Vattenfall”, supported by Vattenfall’s current asset page showing “Vattenfall ownership share 100%”. Vattenfall also operates/manages the site.


wind_farm_id: 6647
canonical_id: 3af987cc-ea1d-437a-9356-1ea3230f3414
wind_farm_name: Aberdeen Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/eowdc_designstatement_0.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Scotland design statement
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/eowdc_designstatement_0.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public sector information
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Initially AOWFL owned by Vattenfall Wind Power Ltd 75% and Aberdeen Renewable Energy Group (AREG) 25%; later Vattenfall became sole owner (100%)

research_value:
Initially AOWFL owned by Vattenfall Wind Power Ltd 75% and Aberdeen Renewable Energy Group (AREG) 25%; later Vattenfall became sole owner (100%)

research_summary:
Historic split is explicit in the 2016 design statement. Newer Marine Scotland and Vattenfall sources show the project company is now wholly owned by Vattenfall. Freshest source date relied on for current position: last month (Marine Scotland 2026 post-consent PDF).


wind_farm_id: 6647
canonical_id: 3af987cc-ea1d-437a-9356-1ea3230f3414
wind_farm_name: Aberdeen Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 34110.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/aberdeen/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall power plant page
source_of_record_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/aberdeen/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current status is operational/in operation on Vattenfall’s live asset page, and Vattenfall’s March 2026 press release discusses ongoing monitoring at the operational wind farm. This aligns with the database validation context.


wind_farm_id: 6647
canonical_id: 3af987cc-ea1d-437a-9356-1ea3230f3414
wind_farm_name: Aberdeen Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 96.8 MW
resolved_value: 96.8 MW
research_value: 96.8 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34111.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/9622_risk_assessment_redacted.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Scotland HT1 demonstrator risk assessment
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/9622_risk_assessment_redacted.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public sector information
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Capacity evidence is slightly mixed across sources: Vattenfall’s current asset page rounds to 96 MWe, while project-specific Vattenfall and Marine Scotland documents state 11 x 8.8 MW and 96.8 MW installed capacity. 96.8 MW is the more precise as-built figure and is close to, though not identical with, the database context value of 97 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6647
canonical_id: 3af987cc-ea1d-437a-9356-1ea3230f3414
wind_farm_name: Aberdeen Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall first-power press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/uk/newsroom/pressreleases/stories/scotlands-largest-offshore-wind-test-site-generates-first-power

research_summary:
I found clear evidence for installed capacity and use of 66 kV export/inter-array cabling, but not an openly accessible source that explicitly states a project MEC in MW/MVA. To avoid confusing gross installed capacity with export limit, this remains Not confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/uk/newsroom/pressreleases/stories/scotlands-largest-offshore-wind-test-site-generates-first-power


wind_farm_id: 6647
canonical_id: 3af987cc-ea1d-437a-9356-1ea3230f3414
wind_farm_name: Aberdeen Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: V164-8.4 MW / V164-8.8 MW variant mix
resolved_value: V164-8.4 MW / V164-8.8 MW variant mix
research_value: V164-8.4 MW / V164-8.8 MW variant mix
resolved_fact_id: 34112.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall commissioning press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/press-and-media/pressreleases/2018/vattenfall-commissions-wind-turbines-with-the-worlds-largest-capacity

research_summary:
Web sources show the as-built wind farm used a mixed set of V164 turbines: Vattenfall stated in 2018 that the eleven turbines comprised nine 8.4 MW and two 8.8 MW units; later site pages simplify this to 11 x 8.8 MW. Because project-specific web sources are inconsistent on the single “model” label, I record the as-built project as a V164 mixed-variant deployment. The linked EuroWindWakes fallback points to V164-8.4 MW, but project-specific web evidence shows two turbines were uprated to 8.8 MW.

source_of_record_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/press-and-media/pressreleases/2018/vattenfall-commissions-wind-turbines-with-the-worlds-largest-capacity


wind_farm_id: 6647
canonical_id: 3af987cc-ea1d-437a-9356-1ea3230f3414
wind_farm_name: Aberdeen Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas
resolved_value: Vestas
research_value: Vestas
resolved_fact_id: 9103.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Vattenfall power plant page
research_source_type: owner/operator webpage
research_source_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/aberdeen/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Vattenfall’s current asset page lists supplier as Vestas. Historic project press releases refer to MHI Vestas/MHI Vestas Offshore Wind at the time of installation; the present-day OEM branding is Vestas.


wind_farm_id: 6647
canonical_id: 3af987cc-ea1d-437a-9356-1ea3230f3414
wind_farm_name: Aberdeen Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 8.4
resolved_value: 8.4
research_value: 8.8 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9413.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Vattenfall/ORE Catapult 2024 press release
research_source_type: owner press release
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Recent project-specific Vattenfall and Marine Scotland pages describe the site as 11 x 8.8 MW. Earlier 2018 Vattenfall press releases show the more detailed as-built mix of nine 8.4 MW and two 8.8 MW. For a single-value field, 8.8 MW best reflects the current project descriptions, but the mixed-variant nuance is important and noted.

research_source_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/uk/newsroom/pressreleases/2024/vattenfall-and-ore-catapult-extend-contract


wind_farm_id: 6647
canonical_id: 3af987cc-ea1d-437a-9356-1ea3230f3414
wind_farm_name: Aberdeen Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 164
resolved_value: 164
research_value: 164 m
resolved_fact_id: 9568.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Marine Scotland design statement
research_source_type: regulator PDF
research_source_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/eowdc_designstatement_0.pdf
research_source_licence: public sector information
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
The 2016 project design statement explicitly ties 164 m rotor diameter to all 11 turbines at this project. This matches the linked EuroWindWakes fallback value, so no generic turbine brochure inference was needed.


wind_farm_id: 6647
canonical_id: 3af987cc-ea1d-437a-9356-1ea3230f3414
wind_farm_name: Aberdeen Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 108.5
resolved_value: 108.5
research_value: 108.5 m
resolved_fact_id: 9723.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Marine Scotland design statement
research_source_type: regulator PDF
research_source_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/eowdc_designstatement_0.pdf
research_source_licence: public sector information
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
The project-specific 2016 design statement explicitly states all 11 turbines have a hub height of 108.5 m above LAT. This matches the linked EuroWindWakes fallback, so the web and dataset evidence reconcile cleanly.


wind_farm_id: 6647
canonical_id: 3af987cc-ea1d-437a-9356-1ea3230f3414
wind_farm_name: Aberdeen Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 11
resolved_value: 11
research_value: 11
resolved_fact_id: 47108.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 11 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Vattenfall power plant page
research_source_type: owner/operator webpage
research_source_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/aberdeen/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Multiple project-specific sources state 11 turbines. This aligns with all non-web validation signals provided in context, including the linked-turbine count and EMODnet hint, so there is no phase-scope discrepancy here.


wind_farm_id: 6647
canonical_id: 3af987cc-ea1d-437a-9356-1ea3230f3414
wind_farm_name: Aberdeen Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Suction bucket jacket foundations
resolved_value: Suction bucket jacket foundations
research_value: Suction bucket jacket foundations
resolved_fact_id: 34118.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall/ORE Catapult 2024 press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/uk/newsroom/pressreleases/2024/vattenfall-and-ore-catapult-extend-contract

research_summary:
Recent project-specific Vattenfall material explicitly states the 11 turbines are supported by suction bucket jacket foundations; the notice to mariners repeats the same foundation type.

source_of_record_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/uk/newsroom/pressreleases/2024/vattenfall-and-ore-catapult-extend-contract


wind_farm_id: 6647
canonical_id: 3af987cc-ea1d-437a-9356-1ea3230f3414
wind_farm_name: Aberdeen Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 26/03/2013
resolved_value: 26/03/2013
research_value: 26/03/2013
resolved_fact_id: 34119.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
research_summary: Marine Scotland documents consistently state Section 36 consent was granted on 26 March 2013.
source_of_record_name: Marine Scotland extension screening opinion request
source_of_record_licence: public sector information
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/aberdeen_bay_extension_of_consent_final_screening_opinion_request_redacted_0.pdf

source_of_record_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/aberdeen_bay_extension_of_consent_final_screening_opinion_request_redacted_0.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6647
canonical_id: 3af987cc-ea1d-437a-9356-1ea3230f3414
wind_farm_name: Aberdeen Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 21/07/2016
resolved_value: 21/07/2016
research_value: 21/07/2016
resolved_fact_id: 34120.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall investment decision press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/press-and-media/pressreleases/2016/vattenfall-to-build-a-wind-farm-off-aberdeen/

research_summary:
Vattenfall’s press release of 21 July 2016 states it had decided to invest in/build the wind farm; this is the clearest accessible FID-equivalent milestone found. A second independent source explicitly labeling “FID” was not readily accessible, so one authoritative source is used per the hard-to-source rule.

source_of_record_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/press-and-media/pressreleases/2016/vattenfall-to-build-a-wind-farm-off-aberdeen/


wind_farm_id: 6647
canonical_id: 3af987cc-ea1d-437a-9356-1ea3230f3414
wind_farm_name: Aberdeen Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/07/2018
resolved_value: 01/07/2018
research_value: 01/07/2018
resolved_fact_id: 34121.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall first-power press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/uk/newsroom/pressreleases/stories/scotlands-largest-offshore-wind-test-site-generates-first-power

research_summary:
Vattenfall stated the project generated power for the first time on 1 July 2018. The 2021 notice to mariners repeats that first power was generated on 1 July 2018.


wind_farm_id: 6647
canonical_id: 3af987cc-ea1d-437a-9356-1ea3230f3414
wind_farm_name: Aberdeen Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2018-09-01
resolved_value: 2018-09-01
research_value: 25/07/2018
resolved_fact_id: 9878.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Marine Scotland extension screening opinion request
research_source_type: regulator PDF
research_source_licence: public sector information
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Later Marine Scotland documents explicitly state Final Commissioning took place on 25th July 2018. This is more precise than inauguration publicity in September 2018, which appears ceremonial rather than the legal final-commissioning date.

research_source_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/aberdeen_bay_extension_of_consent_final_screening_opinion_request_redacted_0.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6648
canonical_id: 56a0ecde-1bc1-4dd6-9916-c6a3c282e6c6
wind_farm_name: Pentland Floating Offshore WF
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=ml%2Fdounreay-tri-floating-wind-demonstration-project
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Scotland project page
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=ml%2Fdounreay-tri-floating-wind-demonstration-project
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Pentland Floating Offshore Wind Farm; historic name: Dounreay Trì Floating Wind Demonstration Project

research_value:
Pentland Floating Offshore Wind Farm; historic name: Dounreay Trì Floating Wind Demonstration Project

research_summary:
Marine Scotland’s project record states PFOWF was “formally known as the Dounreay Trì Floating Wind Demonstration Project” and says the project was renamed in 03/2023; the project website uses Pentland Floating Offshore Wind Farm as the current name.


wind_farm_id: 6648
canonical_id: 56a0ecde-1bc1-4dd6-9916-c6a3c282e6c6
wind_farm_name: Pentland Floating Offshore WF
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34123.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://pentlandfloatingwind.com/about-us/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Pentland Floating Offshore Wind Farm About us
source_of_record_url: https://pentlandfloatingwind.com/about-us/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Highland Wind Limited. Current owners: majority ownership by a fund managed by Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners (CIP), with Great British Energy, National Wealth Fund, Scottish National Investment Bank and Eurus Energy as partners, and Hexicon AB as a minority shareholder. Operator/development lead: Copenhagen Offshore Partners (COP)

resolved_value:
Developer: Highland Wind Limited. Current owners: majority ownership by a fund managed by Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners (CIP), with Great British Energy, National Wealth Fund, Scottish National Investment Bank and Eurus Energy as partners, and Hexicon AB as a minority shareholder. Operator/development lead: Copenhagen Offshore Partners (COP)

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on: the Pentland “About us” page currently states Highland Wind Limited is majority owned by a fund managed by CIP “in partnership with GB Energy, National Wealth Fund, Scottish National Investment Bank and Eurus Energy of Japan, with Hexicon AB as a minority shareholder”; the dated 19/11/2025 National Wealth Fund release confirms GBE, NWF and SNIB acquired initial minority stakes. No accessible current source found a full reconciled percentage split, so percentages are Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6648
canonical_id: 56a0ecde-1bc1-4dd6-9916-c6a3c282e6c6
wind_farm_name: Pentland Floating Offshore WF
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: National Wealth Fund project investment announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
2017 consented as Dounreay Trì; by 2022 materials Highland Wind Ltd was 90% CIP-managed fund / 10% Hexicon; Eurus Energy became a part owner on 17/06/2024; GBE, NWF and SNIB acquired initial minority stakes on 19/11/2025

research_value:
2017 consented as Dounreay Trì; by 2022 materials Highland Wind Ltd was 90% CIP-managed fund / 10% Hexicon; Eurus Energy became a part owner on 17/06/2024; GBE, NWF and SNIB acquired initial minority stakes on 19/11/2025

citation_url:
https://www.nationalwealthfund.org.uk/news-and-publications/news/major-floating-offshore-wind-project-secures-backing-from-the-national-wealth-fund-great-british-energy-and-the-scottish-national-investment-bank/

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on for later ownership changes: 19/11/2025 NWF release. Marine Scotland shows the historic Dounreay Trì identity and says the project was renamed in 03/2023. Pentland 2022 materials indicate the earlier CIP/Hexicon structure; dated 17/06/2024 project news confirms Eurus entry; dated 19/11/2025 NWF confirms three new public investors took minority stakes.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.nationalwealthfund.org.uk/news-and-publications/news/major-floating-offshore-wind-project-secures-backing-from-the-national-wealth-fund-great-british-energy-and-the-scottish-national-investment-bank/


wind_farm_id: 6648
canonical_id: 56a0ecde-1bc1-4dd6-9916-c6a3c282e6c6
wind_farm_name: Pentland Floating Offshore WF
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Consented
resolved_value: Consented
research_value: Consented
resolved_fact_id: 34124.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=ml%2Fdounreay-tri-floating-wind-demonstration-project
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Scotland project page
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=ml%2Fdounreay-tri-floating-wind-demonstration-project
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project is post-consent and has secured AR7 CfD support on 14/01/2026, but no accessible source explicitly says FID has been taken or gives an FID date. Because the permitted status list requires one exact label, Consented is the closest defensible classification pending explicit FID evidence.


wind_farm_id: 6648
canonical_id: 56a0ecde-1bc1-4dd6-9916-c6a3c282e6c6
wind_farm_name: Pentland Floating Offshore WF
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 92.5 MW
resolved_value: 92.5 MW
research_value: 92.5 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34125.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK AR7 results
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/contracts-for-difference-cfd-allocation-round-7-results/contracts-for-difference-allocation-round-7-results-accessible-webpage

research_summary:
The project website and consent materials still describe “around 100MW” / “up to 100MW”, but the freshest award-based capacity is the AR7 CfD award size of 92.50 MW; the NWF factsheet also states 92.5 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6648
canonical_id: 56a0ecde-1bc1-4dd6-9916-c6a3c282e6c6
wind_farm_name: Pentland Floating Offshore WF
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=node%2F22745
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Scotland consent page
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=node%2F22745
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible official source reviewed gave an explicit MEC/export capacity value distinct from generation capacity. Sources reviewed discuss installed/planned capacity only.


wind_farm_id: 6648
canonical_id: 56a0ecde-1bc1-4dd6-9916-c6a3c282e6c6
wind_farm_name: Pentland Floating Offshore WF
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://pentlandfloatingwind.com/document-library/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Pentland document library
source_of_record_url: https://pentlandfloatingwind.com/document-library/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources confirm only envelope choices and later project refinement; no source reviewed names the selected turbine model for this project. Stiesdal sources relate to floating foundation technology, not turbine model.


wind_farm_id: 6648
canonical_id: 56a0ecde-1bc1-4dd6-9916-c6a3c282e6c6
wind_farm_name: Pentland Floating Offshore WF
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Stiesdal Pentland announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://stiesdaloffshore.com/news/pentland-floating-offshore-wind-farm-has-been-awarded-a-cfd-with-the-stiesdal-offshore-tetrasub-selected-as-the-foundation-technology-to-deliver-this-frontrunner-project/

research_summary:
No accessible source explicitly ties a turbine OEM to this project. Stiesdal is the floating foundation technology provider, not the turbine OEM.

source_of_record_url:
https://stiesdaloffshore.com/news/pentland-floating-offshore-wind-farm-has-been-awarded-a-cfd-with-the-stiesdal-offshore-tetrasub-selected-as-the-foundation-technology-to-deliver-this-frontrunner-project/


wind_farm_id: 6648
canonical_id: 56a0ecde-1bc1-4dd6-9916-c6a3c282e6c6
wind_farm_name: Pentland Floating Offshore WF
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 18.5 MW
resolved_value: 18.5 MW
research_value: 18.5 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34126.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.nationalwealthfund.org.uk/media/nrlhuf0b/factsheet-pentland.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: National Wealth Fund Pentland factsheet
source_of_record_url: https://www.nationalwealthfund.org.uk/media/nrlhuf0b/factsheet-pentland.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The NWF factsheet says the project “will consist of five turbines, each with a capacity of 18.5 MW”; that aligns arithmetically with the AR7 awarded 92.5 MW total. This appears fresher and more project-specific than earlier consent-envelope scenario documents.


wind_farm_id: 6648
canonical_id: 56a0ecde-1bc1-4dd6-9916-c6a3c282e6c6
wind_farm_name: Pentland Floating Offshore WF
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Pentland variation application report
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://pentlandfloatingwind.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Section-36-Consent-and-Marine-Licence-Variation-Application-Report-October-2023.pdf

research_summary:
Consent and variation documents provide only design-envelope maxima and illustrative scenarios, not a confirmed selected rotor diameter tied to the now-backed 92.5 MW scheme.

source_of_record_url:
https://pentlandfloatingwind.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Section-36-Consent-and-Marine-Licence-Variation-Application-Report-October-2023.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6648
canonical_id: 56a0ecde-1bc1-4dd6-9916-c6a3c282e6c6
wind_farm_name: Pentland Floating Offshore WF
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Pentland variation application report
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://pentlandfloatingwind.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Section-36-Consent-and-Marine-Licence-Variation-Application-Report-October-2023.pdf

research_summary:
Accessible sources provide only project envelope values and scenario assumptions, not a confirmed selected turbine hub height for the current scheme.


wind_farm_id: 6648
canonical_id: 56a0ecde-1bc1-4dd6-9916-c6a3c282e6c6
wind_farm_name: Pentland Floating Offshore WF
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 5
resolved_value: 5
research_value: 5
resolved_fact_id: 34127.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.nationalwealthfund.org.uk/media/nrlhuf0b/factsheet-pentland.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: National Wealth Fund Pentland factsheet
source_of_record_url: https://www.nationalwealthfund.org.uk/media/nrlhuf0b/factsheet-pentland.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The strongest current sources are the 19/11/2025 NWF factsheet (“five turbines, each with a capacity of 18.5 MW”) and the 92.5 MW AR7 award total. This differs from the database validation hint of 0 and from older consent-envelope sources allowing up to six or seven turbines; the most likely reason is that the validation signal reflects stale/pre-build dataset values, while later financing and award documents reflect the current configured scheme.


wind_farm_id: 6648
canonical_id: 56a0ecde-1bc1-4dd6-9916-c6a3c282e6c6
wind_farm_name: Pentland Floating Offshore WF
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Floating foundation; Stiesdal Offshore TetraSub selected
resolved_value: Floating foundation; Stiesdal Offshore TetraSub selected
research_value: Floating foundation; Stiesdal Offshore TetraSub selected
resolved_fact_id: 34128.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Stiesdal Pentland announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://stiesdaloffshore.com/news/pentland-floating-offshore-wind-farm-has-been-awarded-a-cfd-with-the-stiesdal-offshore-tetrasub-selected-as-the-foundation-technology-to-deliver-this-frontrunner-project/

research_summary:
Pentland is a floating wind project; the freshest project-specific technology confirmation is Stiesdal’s dated 14/01/2026 statement that TetraSub has been selected as the foundation technology for Pentland. Earlier consent documents allowed multiple floating substructure options, but the later supplier announcement is more specific.


wind_farm_id: 6648
canonical_id: 56a0ecde-1bc1-4dd6-9916-c6a3c282e6c6
wind_farm_name: Pentland Floating Offshore WF
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 28/06/2023
resolved_value: 28/06/2023
research_value: 28/06/2023
resolved_fact_id: 34129.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=node%2F22745
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Scotland consent page
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=node%2F22745
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Marine Scotland’s consent page shows “Date licence granted: 2023-06-28”; the dated 11/10/2023 variation application report also states “consent was granted on 28 June 2023.”


wind_farm_id: 6648
canonical_id: 56a0ecde-1bc1-4dd6-9916-c6a3c282e6c6
wind_farm_name: Pentland Floating Offshore WF
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: National Wealth Fund investment announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.nationalwealthfund.org.uk/news-and-publications/news/major-floating-offshore-wind-project-secures-backing-from-the-national-wealth-fund-great-british-energy-and-the-scottish-national-investment-bank/

research_summary:
No accessible official, regulator, or owner source reviewed states that FID has been taken or gives a date. Public investment and CfD award are material milestones, but should not be relabelled as FID without explicit wording.


wind_farm_id: 6648
canonical_id: 56a0ecde-1bc1-4dd6-9916-c6a3c282e6c6
wind_farm_name: Pentland Floating Offshore WF
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK AR7 results
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible source reviewed confirms first power. The AR7 result gives delivery year 2029/30 for Phase 1, but that is not the same as a first-power date.


wind_farm_id: 6648
canonical_id: 56a0ecde-1bc1-4dd6-9916-c6a3c282e6c6
wind_farm_name: Pentland Floating Offshore WF
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK AR7 results
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible source reviewed gives a commissioning date. AR7 delivery year 2029/30 is a support-scheme delivery year, not a confirmed commissioning milestone.


wind_farm_id: 6649
canonical_id: 2e4f800b-f91c-4a4e-bfb3-eb7b5de5eab5
wind_farm_name: Kincardine
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Kincardine Offshore Windfarm; also referred to as Kincardine floating offshore wind farm / KOWL
research_value: Kincardine Offshore Windfarm; also referred to as Kincardine floating offshore wind farm / KOWL
citation_url: https://www.principlepower.com/projects/kincardine-offshore-wind-farm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Principle Power project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.principlepower.com/projects/kincardine-offshore-wind-farm
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific sources consistently describe the same built floating project 15 km off Aberdeenshire. Principle Power uses “Kincardine Offshore Wind Farm”; Vestas and gov.scot use “Kincardine Offshore Windfarm”.


wind_farm_id: 6649
canonical_id: 2e4f800b-f91c-4a4e-bfb3-eb7b5de5eab5
wind_farm_name: Kincardine
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34130.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Energy Global
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Kincardine Offshore Windfarm Ltd (KOWL), originally developed by Pilot Offshore Renewables with Atkins; current controlling owner / majority shareholder: Dragados / Grupo Cobra; operator: Grupo Cobra; O&M support by Principle Power

resolved_value:
Developer: Kincardine Offshore Windfarm Ltd (KOWL), originally developed by Pilot Offshore Renewables with Atkins; current controlling owner / majority shareholder: Dragados / Grupo Cobra; operator: Grupo Cobra; O&M support by Principle Power

citation_url:
https://www.energyglobal.com/wind/02072024/acteon-awarded-operations-and-maintenance-work-for-kincardine-floating-offshore-wind-farm/

research_summary:
Freshest dated ownership/operator evidence used: 02/07/2024 Energy Global says Grupo Cobra operates the wind farm for KOWL and that KOWL’s majority shareholder is DRAGADOS S.A. Principle Power’s project page identifies Dragados as project sponsor and states it currently provides O&M services. Historic development sources show PORL/Atkins originated the project. A full reconciled current equity split was not confirmed from accessible official sources.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.energyglobal.com/wind/02072024/acteon-awarded-operations-and-maintenance-work-for-kincardine-floating-offshore-wind-farm/


wind_farm_id: 6649
canonical_id: 2e4f800b-f91c-4a4e-bfb3-eb7b5de5eab5
wind_farm_name: Kincardine
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.principlepower.com/ja/news/kowl-worlds-largest-floating-windfarm-fully-operational
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Principle Power news
source_of_record_url: https://www.principlepower.com/ja/news/kowl-worlds-largest-floating-windfarm-fully-operational
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
2014 development by Allan MacAskill and Nicol Stephen / PORL-led team; 2016 Cobra Group became main investor; by 2024 KOWL majority shareholder stated as DRAGADOS S.A.

research_value:
2014 development by Allan MacAskill and Nicol Stephen / PORL-led team; 2016 Cobra Group became main investor; by 2024 KOWL majority shareholder stated as DRAGADOS S.A.

research_summary:
Freshest dated source used: 02/07/2024. Principle Power’s 19/10/2021 project update says the project started in 2014 and that Cobra Group became main investor in 2016. Energy Global in 2024 confirms KOWL’s majority shareholder is DRAGADOS S.A. Accessible sources do not provide a complete current percentage breakdown summing to 100%, so percentages remain Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6649
canonical_id: 2e4f800b-f91c-4a4e-bfb3-eb7b5de5eab5
wind_farm_name: Kincardine
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 34131.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.principlepower.com/ja/news/kowl-worlds-largest-floating-windfarm-fully-operational
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Principle Power news
source_of_record_url: https://www.principlepower.com/ja/news/kowl-worlds-largest-floating-windfarm-fully-operational
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Principle Power states the project achieved 50 MW by fall 2021; its 19/10/2021 news post says it was fully commissioned and delivering power. 2024 O&M reporting also describes it as an operating 50 MW wind farm. This matches the Boundary Layer label Operational.


wind_farm_id: 6649
canonical_id: 2e4f800b-f91c-4a4e-bfb3-eb7b5de5eab5
wind_farm_name: Kincardine
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 50 MW
resolved_value: 50 MW
research_value: 50 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34132.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.principlepower.com/projects/kincardine-offshore-wind-farm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Principle Power project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.principlepower.com/projects/kincardine-offshore-wind-farm
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific sources mostly round to 50 MW, although Vestas gives detailed installed composition of 5 x 9.525 MW + 1 x 2.0 MW = 49.625 MW. For project profiling, 50 MW is the consistent headline installed capacity and matches the regional source context.


wind_farm_id: 6649
canonical_id: 2e4f800b-f91c-4a4e-bfb3-eb7b5de5eab5
wind_farm_name: Kincardine
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 50 MW
resolved_value: 50 MW
research_value: 50 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34133.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/00536372.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Scotland construction programme
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/00536372.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public sector webpage / PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Harder-to-source field. Marine Scotland consent/compliance documents repeatedly state the project’s maximum generation capacity is capped at 50 MW and describe two 33 kV export cables. No clearer separate MEC figure was found, so 50 MW is the best-supported export-capacity-equivalent project cap.


wind_farm_id: 6649
canonical_id: 2e4f800b-f91c-4a4e-bfb3-eb7b5de5eab5
wind_farm_name: Kincardine
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas V164-9.5 MW and one Vestas V80-2.0 MW
resolved_value: Vestas V164-9.5 MW and one Vestas V80-2.0 MW
research_value: Vestas V164-9.5 MW and one Vestas V80-2.0 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34134.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.principlepower.com/ja/news/kowl-worlds-largest-floating-windfarm-fully-operational
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Principle Power news
source_of_record_url: https://www.principlepower.com/ja/news/kowl-worlds-largest-floating-windfarm-fully-operational
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web evidence is clear that the built project combines five V164-9.5 MW turbines with one earlier 2 MW V80 unit.


wind_farm_id: 6649
canonical_id: 2e4f800b-f91c-4a4e-bfb3-eb7b5de5eab5
wind_farm_name: Kincardine
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 9.5
resolved_value: 9.5
research_value: 9.5 MW for the five main turbines; 2.0 MW for the earlier KIN-01 turbine
resolved_fact_id: 9414.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
research_summary: Project-specific sources explicitly describe the as-built mixed-turbine configuration.
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Vestas press release
research_source_type: OEM press release
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_source_url:
https://www.vestas.com/en/media/mwow-press-releases/2020/first-ever-v164-9-5-mw-turbine-installed-on-a-floating-wind-proj


wind_farm_id: 6649
canonical_id: 2e4f800b-f91c-4a4e-bfb3-eb7b5de5eab5
wind_farm_name: Kincardine
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 164
resolved_value: 164
research_value: 164 m
resolved_fact_id: 9569.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web pages identify the five larger machines as V164 turbines but do not directly restate rotor diameter; per the required fallback rule, the linked EuroWindWakes project turbine metadata was used for the specific rotor diameter value.


wind_farm_id: 6649
canonical_id: 2e4f800b-f91c-4a4e-bfb3-eb7b5de5eab5
wind_farm_name: Kincardine
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 105
resolved_value: 105
research_value: 105 m
resolved_fact_id: 9724.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web evidence remained ambiguous: Scottish consent variation documents show hub height was increased up to 105 m, but did not clearly confirm final as-built hub height for every large turbine. Per the required fallback rule, the linked EuroWindWakes value 105 m was used as the project-linked turbine fallback.


wind_farm_id: 6649
canonical_id: 2e4f800b-f91c-4a4e-bfb3-eb7b5de5eab5
wind_farm_name: Kincardine
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 5
resolved_value: 5
research_value: 6
resolved_fact_id: 47109.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 5 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Principle Power news
research_source_type: supplier / project news
research_source_url: https://www.principlepower.com/ja/news/kowl-worlds-largest-floating-windfarm-fully-operational
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Multiple project-specific sources state five V164-9.5 MW turbines plus one V80-2.0 MW turbine. This aligns with the regional source row and the EMODnet hint of 6, and differs from the 5 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations likely because that linked set appears to represent only the later V164 units and omit the earlier 2 MW KIN-01 unit.


wind_farm_id: 6649
canonical_id: 2e4f800b-f91c-4a4e-bfb3-eb7b5de5eab5
wind_farm_name: Kincardine
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Floating semi-submersible foundations; WindFloat® for the five larger units
resolved_value: Floating semi-submersible foundations; WindFloat® for the five larger units
research_value: Floating semi-submersible foundations; WindFloat® for the five larger units
resolved_fact_id: 34140.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vestas press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.vestas.com/en/media/mwow-press-releases/2020/first-ever-v164-9-5-mw-turbine-installed-on-a-floating-wind-proj

research_summary:
Project-specific sources consistently describe WindFloat semi-submersible floating foundations for the main five turbines. Marine Scotland variation documents also describe the varied project substructures as semi-submersible WindFloat design.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.vestas.com/en/media/mwow-press-releases/2020/first-ever-v164-9-5-mw-turbine-installed-on-a-floating-wind-proj


wind_farm_id: 6649
canonical_id: 2e4f800b-f91c-4a4e-bfb3-eb7b5de5eab5
wind_farm_name: Kincardine
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 07/03/2017
resolved_value: 07/03/2017
research_value: 07/03/2017
resolved_fact_id: 34141.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/00535798.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Scotland decision notice
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/00535798.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public sector webpage / PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Scottish Government announced consent on 09/03/2017 and Marine Scotland’s later decision notice explicitly references the consent granted on 07/03/2017. Using the exact grant date, normalized as DD/MM/YYYY.


wind_farm_id: 6649
canonical_id: 2e4f800b-f91c-4a4e-bfb3-eb7b5de5eab5
wind_farm_name: Kincardine
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.principlepower.com/ja/news/kowl-worlds-largest-floating-windfarm-fully-operational
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Principle Power news
source_of_record_url: https://www.principlepower.com/ja/news/kowl-worlds-largest-floating-windfarm-fully-operational
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible authoritative source found a clearly labelled FID date. Sources show development and investment milestones, including Cobra becoming main investor in 2016, but not a definitive published FID date.


wind_farm_id: 6649
canonical_id: 2e4f800b-f91c-4a4e-bfb3-eb7b5de5eab5
wind_farm_name: Kincardine
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/09/2018
resolved_value: 01/09/2018
research_value: 01/09/2018
resolved_fact_id: 34142.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Principle Power news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.principlepower.com/ja/news/principle-powers-windfloat-provides-the-foundation-for-the-kincardine-floating-wind-projects-first-electrons

research_summary:
Principle Power’s 01/11/2018 news states first power “began flowing in September”; DIGIT reported first power had been reached and published on 02/11/2018. As only month/year is explicit, normalized to 01/09/2018.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.principlepower.com/ja/news/principle-powers-windfloat-provides-the-foundation-for-the-kincardine-floating-wind-projects-first-electrons


wind_farm_id: 6649
canonical_id: 2e4f800b-f91c-4a4e-bfb3-eb7b5de5eab5
wind_farm_name: Kincardine
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2021-10-01
resolved_value: 2021-10-01
research_value: 19/10/2021
resolved_fact_id: 9879.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Principle Power news
research_source_type: supplier / project news
research_source_url: https://www.principlepower.com/ja/news/kowl-worlds-largest-floating-windfarm-fully-operational
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Principle Power’s dated project news explicitly says the wind farm was fully operational on 19/10/2021; 2024 reporting also says the turbines have been generating since October 2021.


wind_farm_id: 6651
canonical_id: 8326b4df-be58-48b7-aa0f-b08cc17a9fbe
wind_farm_name: Beech
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Beech Offshore Wind Farm
research_value: Beech Offshore Wind Farm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate RIAA Part 2
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/riaa_-_part_2_-_assessment_on_special_areas_of_conservation.pdf

research_summary:
Assessed project is the standalone INTOG TOG lease-area project named Beech Offshore Wind Farm, one of Cerulean Winds’ three NSRG projects alongside Aspen and Cedar. Crown Estate Scotland’s applicant listing shows a 1008 MW Cerulean TOG project, and Marine Directorate assessment material explicitly names “Beech Offshore Wind Farm”.

source_of_record_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/riaa_-_part_2_-_assessment_on_special_areas_of_conservation.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6651
canonical_id: 8326b4df-be58-48b7-aa0f-b08cc17a9fbe
wind_farm_name: Beech
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34144.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cerulean Winds corporate update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Cerulean Winds; current owner(s): Not confirmed; equity partners and ownership percentages: Not confirmed; operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: Cerulean Winds; current owner(s): Not confirmed; equity partners and ownership percentages: Not confirmed; operator: Not confirmed

citation_url:
https://ceruleanwinds.com/cerulean-winds-expands-team-to-drive-development-of-floating-offshore-wind-project/

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on for developer is Cerulean Winds’ 16/04/2025 update describing it as the lead developer of Aspen, Beech and Cedar. Crown Estate Scotland’s INTOG listing independently identifies Cerulean Winds as lead applicant. No current official source found that reconciles full legal ownership split or operator for Beech specifically, so these remain Not confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://ceruleanwinds.com/cerulean-winds-expands-team-to-drive-development-of-floating-offshore-wind-project/


wind_farm_id: 6651
canonical_id: 8326b4df-be58-48b7-aa0f-b08cc17a9fbe
wind_farm_name: Beech
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Crown Estate Scotland INTOG results
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
01/03/2023: exclusivity awarded to Cerulean Winds under INTOG TOG leasing; later project development presented as part of Cerulean’s North Sea Renewables Grid (NSRG); no later transfer of Beech ownership confirmed

research_value:
01/03/2023: exclusivity awarded to Cerulean Winds under INTOG TOG leasing; later project development presented as part of Cerulean’s North Sea Renewables Grid (NSRG); no later transfer of Beech ownership confirmed

citation_url:
https://www.crownestatescotland.com/news/intog-13-projects-selected-to-support-green-innovation-and-help-decarbonise-north-sea

research_summary:
Crown Estate Scotland announced 13 INTOG selections in March 2023 and listed three separate 1008 MW Cerulean TOG awards. Cerulean’s later project pages and 2025 corporate update continue to present Beech as part of its NSRG portfolio. Freshest ownership/developer continuity signal used is 16/04/2025; no dated official evidence of a stake sale or ownership dilution for Beech was found.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.crownestatescotland.com/news/intog-13-projects-selected-to-support-green-innovation-and-help-decarbonise-north-sea


wind_farm_id: 6651
canonical_id: 8326b4df-be58-48b7-aa0f-b08cc17a9fbe
wind_farm_name: Beech
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
resolved_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
research_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
resolved_fact_id: 34145.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate RIAA Part 2
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/riaa_-_part_2_-_assessment_on_special_areas_of_conservation.pdf

research_summary:
Crown Estate Scotland’s INTOG applicant listing confirms Cerulean Winds received a TOG award for a 1008 MW project, while Marine Directorate assessment material lists Beech with status Pre-Planning. Closest exact Boundary Layer label is Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning because seabed rights were awarded through the INTOG process but no project-specific consent application for Beech was found.


wind_farm_id: 6651
canonical_id: 8326b4df-be58-48b7-aa0f-b08cc17a9fbe
wind_farm_name: Beech
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1008 MW
resolved_value: 1008 MW
research_value: 1008 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34146.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Crown Estate Scotland INTOG applicant listing
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.crownestatescotland.com/sites/default/files/2023-11/INTOG_FIO_Map%20and%20Applicant%20Listing_24Nov2023.pdf

research_summary:
Cross-checked against Crown Estate Scotland’s INTOG listing and Marine Directorate assessment material; both state Beech is proposed for up to 1008 MW.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.crownestatescotland.com/sites/default/files/2023-11/INTOG_FIO_Map%20and%20Applicant%20Listing_24Nov2023.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6651
canonical_id: 8326b4df-be58-48b7-aa0f-b08cc17a9fbe
wind_farm_name: Beech
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ceruleanwinds.com/north-sea-renewables-grid-nsrg/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cerulean NSRG page
source_of_record_url: https://ceruleanwinds.com/north-sea-renewables-grid-nsrg/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No Beech-specific grid or consent application page was found stating a distinct MEC. Cerulean’s NSRG concept describes power supply to oil and gas assets with excess export to grid, but does not provide a project-specific MEC for Beech.


wind_farm_id: 6651
canonical_id: 8326b4df-be58-48b7-aa0f-b08cc17a9fbe
wind_farm_name: Beech
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ceruleanwinds.com/north-sea-renewables-grid-nsrg/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cerulean NSRG page
source_of_record_url: https://ceruleanwinds.com/north-sea-renewables-grid-nsrg/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided in context, and no Beech-specific web source confirms a turbine model. Cerulean’s NSRG page mentions only aggregate turbine count across Aspen/Beech/Cedar, not a model.


wind_farm_id: 6651
canonical_id: 8326b4df-be58-48b7-aa0f-b08cc17a9fbe
wind_farm_name: Beech
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Crown Estate Scotland INTOG applicant listing
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.crownestatescotland.com/sites/default/files/2023-11/INTOG_FIO_Map%20and%20Applicant%20Listing_24Nov2023.pdf

research_summary:
Siemens Gamesa appears in Crown Estate Scotland’s project-partner list for Cerulean’s INTOG bids, but that does not confirm Beech’s final turbine OEM. No Beech-specific source explicitly names the selected OEM, so this remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6651
canonical_id: 8326b4df-be58-48b7-aa0f-b08cc17a9fbe
wind_farm_name: Beech
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ceruleanwinds.com/north-sea-renewables-grid-nsrg/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cerulean NSRG page
source_of_record_url: https://ceruleanwinds.com/north-sea-renewables-grid-nsrg/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No Beech-specific turbine selection found, and no linked EuroWindWakes fallback exists in the provided context.


wind_farm_id: 6651
canonical_id: 8326b4df-be58-48b7-aa0f-b08cc17a9fbe
wind_farm_name: Beech
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ceruleanwinds.com/north-sea-renewables-grid-nsrg/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cerulean NSRG page
source_of_record_url: https://ceruleanwinds.com/north-sea-renewables-grid-nsrg/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific turbine specification found for Beech; no linked EuroWindWakes fallback exists in the provided context.


wind_farm_id: 6651
canonical_id: 8326b4df-be58-48b7-aa0f-b08cc17a9fbe
wind_farm_name: Beech
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Crown Estate Scotland INTOG applicant listing
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No Beech-specific hub height found, and the project context says no linked turbine metadata was found; hub height therefore cannot be inferred from generic turbine platforms.


wind_farm_id: 6651
canonical_id: 8326b4df-be58-48b7-aa0f-b08cc17a9fbe
wind_farm_name: Beech
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 8800.0
resolved_source_type: emodnet
resolved_source_name: EMODnet Human Activities
resolved_source_detail: EMODnet Jan 2026
citation_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMODnet Human Activities
source_of_record_type: public data portal
source_of_record_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
source_of_record_licence: Free and open public portal
research_source_name: Cerulean NSRG page
research_source_type: developer
research_source_url: https://ceruleanwinds.com/north-sea-renewables-grid-nsrg/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Cerulean states Aspen, Beech and Cedar together would comprise “over 300 turbines”, but no Beech-only count was found. This differs from the non-web validation signal of 0 turbines, which likely reflects the project’s pre-planning status rather than an explicit project design count. Without a Beech-specific source, the count is Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6651
canonical_id: 8326b4df-be58-48b7-aa0f-b08cc17a9fbe
wind_farm_name: Beech
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Floating foundations
resolved_value: Floating foundations
research_value: Floating foundations
resolved_fact_id: 34147.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate Aspen offshore scoping report
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/aspen_owf_appendix_6.1_offshore_scoping_report_final.pdf

research_summary:
Regulator and developer materials both identify Beech as part of Cerulean’s floating offshore wind NSRG concept. A Marine Directorate scoping document for the connected Cerulean NSRG projects states the wind turbine technology will consist of floating semi-submersible substructures, supporting the higher-level classification Floating foundations for Beech. Specific substructure subtype for Beech itself was not separately confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/aspen_owf_appendix_6.1_offshore_scoping_report_final.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6651
canonical_id: 8326b4df-be58-48b7-aa0f-b08cc17a9fbe
wind_farm_name: Beech
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ceruleanwinds.com/projects/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cerulean projects page
source_of_record_url: https://ceruleanwinds.com/projects/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No Beech-specific consent application or consent decision was found. Recent public consent activity located is for Aspen, not Beech.


wind_farm_id: 6651
canonical_id: 8326b4df-be58-48b7-aa0f-b08cc17a9fbe
wind_farm_name: Beech
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cerulean corporate update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://ceruleanwinds.com/cerulean-winds-expands-team-to-drive-development-of-floating-offshore-wind-project/

research_summary:
No Beech-specific first-power date was found. Cerulean gives timing guidance for Aspen, but not for Beech.


wind_farm_id: 6651
canonical_id: 8326b4df-be58-48b7-aa0f-b08cc17a9fbe
wind_farm_name: Beech
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://aspen.ceruleanwinds.com/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Aspen project website
source_of_record_url: https://aspen.ceruleanwinds.com/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No Beech-specific commissioning date was found. Aspen is stated to be first to build, implying Beech follows later, but no dated Beech COD is confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6652
canonical_id: a33bac39-753b-42ac-b7b1-17afe3c27e26
wind_farm_name: Neart na Gaoithe Offshore WF
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Neart na Gaoithe (NnG) Offshore Wind Farm
research_value: Neart na Gaoithe (NnG) Offshore Wind Farm
citation_url: https://nngoffshorewind.com/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: NNG Offshore Wind project website
source_of_record_url: https://nngoffshorewind.com/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project website and ESB both use Neart na Gaoithe (NnG); “Neart na Gaoithe” translates as “Strength of the wind”. Historic development was originally by Mainstream Renewable Power before EDF acquired the project in 2018.


wind_farm_id: 6652
canonical_id: a33bac39-753b-42ac-b7b1-17afe3c27e26
wind_farm_name: Neart na Gaoithe Offshore WF
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34148.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ESB press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Mainstream Renewable Power (historic); current owners: EDF power solutions UK & Ireland 50%, ESB 50%; operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: Mainstream Renewable Power (historic); current owners: EDF power solutions UK & Ireland 50%, ESB 50%; operator: Not confirmed

citation_url:
https://esb.ie/news---insights/press-releases/article/2025/07/25/scotland-s-first-minister-marks-the-completion-of-neart-na-gaoithe-offshore-wind-farm

research_summary:
Freshest ownership evidence is the project site crawled last week stating EDF acquired NnG in 05/2018 and ESB bought 50% in 11/2019, plus ESB’s dated 25/07/2025 press release confirming NnG “is co-owned by EDF power solutions UK and Ireland and ESB”. I did not find a clearly dated official page explicitly naming the day-to-day operator separately from the owners.

source_of_record_url:
https://esb.ie/news---insights/press-releases/article/2025/07/25/scotland-s-first-minister-marks-the-completion-of-neart-na-gaoithe-offshore-wind-farm


wind_farm_id: 6652
canonical_id: a33bac39-753b-42ac-b7b1-17afe3c27e26
wind_farm_name: Neart na Gaoithe Offshore WF
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://nngoffshorewind.com/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: NNG Offshore Wind project website
source_of_record_url: https://nngoffshorewind.com/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Mainstream Renewable Power developed the project; EDF acquired it in 05/2018; ESB acquired a 50% stake in 11/2019; current split 50:50 EDF power solutions UK & Ireland / ESB

research_value:
Mainstream Renewable Power developed the project; EDF acquired it in 05/2018; ESB acquired a 50% stake in 11/2019; current split 50:50 EDF power solutions UK & Ireland / ESB

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on for current ownership is 25/07/2025 from ESB confirming co-ownership. Historic chain is corroborated by the project site and ESB’s 28/11/2019 acquisition release.


wind_farm_id: 6652
canonical_id: a33bac39-753b-42ac-b7b1-17afe3c27e26
wind_farm_name: Neart na Gaoithe Offshore WF
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 34149.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ESB press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://esb.ie/news---insights/press-releases/article/2025/07/25/scotland-s-first-minister-marks-the-completion-of-neart-na-gaoithe-offshore-wind-farm

research_summary:
ESB stated on 25/07/2025 that the project had become “fully operational”; the project site timeline shows first power in 2024 and completion in 2025. This aligns with the database context status of Operational.


wind_farm_id: 6652
canonical_id: a33bac39-753b-42ac-b7b1-17afe3c27e26
wind_farm_name: Neart na Gaoithe Offshore WF
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 448 MW
resolved_value: 448 MW
research_value: 448 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34150.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ofgem regulation 21 notice
source_of_record_licence: public sector information / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2025-10/Offshore%20Transmission%20-%20Notice%20under%20Regulation%2021%281%29%20-%20Neart%20na%20Gaoithe%20project.pdf

research_summary:
Authoritative web sources mostly round to 450 MW / up to 450 MW; however Ofgem’s OFTO notice and multiple sector references use 448 MW, matching the validation context. I therefore use 448 MW as the more precise installed capacity and note that owner/project pages round it.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2025-10/Offshore%20Transmission%20-%20Notice%20under%20Regulation%2021%281%29%20-%20Neart%20na%20Gaoithe%20project.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6652
canonical_id: a33bac39-753b-42ac-b7b1-17afe3c27e26
wind_farm_name: Neart na Gaoithe Offshore WF
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 450 MW
resolved_value: 450 MW
research_value: 450 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34151.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://nngoffshorewind.com/resources-old/offshore-section-36-consent-variation/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: NNG Offshore Section 36 consent variation page
source_of_record_url: https://nngoffshorewind.com/resources-old/offshore-section-36-consent-variation/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I did not find an openly accessible official source explicitly labelling “MEC”. The consent variation materials state the “maximum generating capacity will continue to be limited to 450MW”, which is the clearest official proxy for MEC available from accessible project/consent sources.


wind_farm_id: 6652
canonical_id: a33bac39-753b-42ac-b7b1-17afe3c27e26
wind_farm_name: Neart na Gaoithe Offshore WF
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: SG 8.0-167 DD
resolved_value: SG 8.0-167 DD
research_value: SG 8.0-167 DD
resolved_fact_id: 34152.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa project order press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/press-releases/191128-siemens-gamesa-scottish-offshore-order-en.html

research_summary:
Siemens Gamesa’s project-specific order press release explicitly ties 54 units of SG 8.0-167 DD to Neart na Gaoithe.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/press-releases/191128-siemens-gamesa-scottish-offshore-order-en.html


wind_farm_id: 6652
canonical_id: a33bac39-753b-42ac-b7b1-17afe3c27e26
wind_farm_name: Neart na Gaoithe Offshore WF
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens Gamesa
resolved_value: Siemens Gamesa
research_value: Siemens Gamesa
resolved_fact_id: 9105.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Siemens Gamesa project order press release
research_source_type: OEM website
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Siemens Gamesa was the turbine supplier under the firm order for NnG; EuroWindWakes linked turbine metadata also gives Siemens Gamesa as OEM.

research_source_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/press-releases/191128-siemens-gamesa-scottish-offshore-order-en.html


wind_farm_id: 6652
canonical_id: a33bac39-753b-42ac-b7b1-17afe3c27e26
wind_farm_name: Neart na Gaoithe Offshore WF
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 8
resolved_value: 8
research_value: 8 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9415.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Siemens Gamesa’s project-specific release states NnG will use 54 units of the SG 8.0-167 DD platform; EuroWindWakes linked metadata gives rated power 8 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6652
canonical_id: a33bac39-753b-42ac-b7b1-17afe3c27e26
wind_farm_name: Neart na Gaoithe Offshore WF
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 167
resolved_value: 167
research_value: 167 m
resolved_fact_id: 9570.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Siemens Gamesa project order press release
research_source_type: OEM website
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Siemens Gamesa’s NnG-specific order gives 167-metre rotor diameter; EuroWindWakes linked turbine metadata also gives 167 m.


wind_farm_id: 6652
canonical_id: a33bac39-753b-42ac-b7b1-17afe3c27e26
wind_farm_name: Neart na Gaoithe Offshore WF
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 126
resolved_value: 126
research_value: 126 m
resolved_fact_id: 9725.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific accessible web evidence for as-built hub height remained weak. A Marine Scotland project document excerpt indicates maximum hub height 126m for the revised project, and the linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata gives 126 m; per the required fallback rule, I use 126 m and note dataset fallback support.


wind_farm_id: 6652
canonical_id: a33bac39-753b-42ac-b7b1-17afe3c27e26
wind_farm_name: Neart na Gaoithe Offshore WF
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 54
resolved_value: 54
research_value: 54
resolved_fact_id: 47110.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 54 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: ESB press release
research_source_type: owner website
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Siemens Gamesa’s project-specific order says 54 units; ESB’s completion release says the wind farm “has 54 wind turbines”. This aligns with all non-web validation signals provided, including the 54 linked turbine locations.


wind_farm_id: 6652
canonical_id: a33bac39-753b-42ac-b7b1-17afe3c27e26
wind_farm_name: Neart na Gaoithe Offshore WF
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Jacket foundations
resolved_value: Jacket foundations
research_value: Jacket foundations
resolved_fact_id: 34158.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/00533186.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Scotland revised project summary PDF
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/00533186.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public sector information / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Marine Scotland revised-project material states “Foundation options … Jackets only” and notes pile counts per jacket; this is consistent with construction reporting around jacket installation.


wind_farm_id: 6652
canonical_id: a33bac39-753b-42ac-b7b1-17afe3c27e26
wind_farm_name: Neart na Gaoithe Offshore WF
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 10/10/2014
resolved_value: 10/10/2014
research_value: 10/10/2014
resolved_fact_id: 34159.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: NNG consent announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://nngoffshorewind.com/mainstream-granted-consent-by-scottish-gov-to-build-450mw-offshore-wind-farm/

research_summary:
The original project consent was granted by Scottish Ministers on 10 October 2014; a later revised design consent followed in 2018, but the initial consent date remains 10/10/2014.

source_of_record_url:
https://nngoffshorewind.com/mainstream-granted-consent-by-scottish-gov-to-build-450mw-offshore-wind-farm/


wind_farm_id: 6652
canonical_id: a33bac39-753b-42ac-b7b1-17afe3c27e26
wind_farm_name: Neart na Gaoithe Offshore WF
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 28/11/2019
resolved_value: 28/11/2019
research_value: 28/11/2019
resolved_fact_id: 34160.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EDF group press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.edf.fr/le-groupe-edf-lance-la-construction-du-parc-eolien-en-mer-de-neart-na-gaoithe-de-450-mw-avec-son-nouveau-partenaire-irlandais-esb

research_summary:
Official sources refer to financial close rather than explicitly saying FID. Using the closest project-finance milestone, NnG “achieves financial close” in 2019 and EDF/ESB announced construction launch on 28/11/2019. I therefore use 28/11/2019 as the FID-equivalent milestone and note the wording nuance.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.edf.fr/le-groupe-edf-lance-la-construction-du-parc-eolien-en-mer-de-neart-na-gaoithe-de-450-mw-avec-son-nouveau-partenaire-irlandais-esb


wind_farm_id: 6652
canonical_id: a33bac39-753b-42ac-b7b1-17afe3c27e26
wind_farm_name: Neart na Gaoithe Offshore WF
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/10/2024
resolved_value: 01/10/2024
research_value: 01/10/2024
resolved_fact_id: 34161.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.landuse.co.uk/news/first-power-generated-neart-na-gaoithe/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: LUC news item
source_of_record_url: https://www.landuse.co.uk/news/first-power-generated-neart-na-gaoithe/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project site timeline states first power in 2024, and a dated external planning/environment consultancy note reports 23/10/2024 that first power had been generated. Because the visible official timeline on the project site only resolves to month/year via the 2024 timeline entry, I normalize to 01/10/2024 and note month-level certainty.


wind_farm_id: 6652
canonical_id: a33bac39-753b-42ac-b7b1-17afe3c27e26
wind_farm_name: Neart na Gaoithe Offshore WF
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2025-07-01
resolved_value: 2025-07-01
research_value: 25/07/2025
resolved_fact_id: 9880.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: ESB press release
research_source_type: owner website
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
ESB’s dated release says the project became fully operational and marked completion on 25/07/2025; this is the clearest authoritative commissioning-complete milestone.


wind_farm_id: 6653
canonical_id: 86fef2fd-d0de-465f-afd1-f22e2a672881
wind_farm_name: Seagreen Phase 1 Windfarm
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.sserenewables.com/offshore-wind/operational-wind-farms/seagreen/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SSE Renewables Seagreen operational project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.sserenewables.com/offshore-wind/operational-wind-farms/seagreen/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Seagreen Phase 1 Offshore Wind Farm; also referred to as Seagreen, Seagreen Phase 1, and historically derived from the consented Seagreen Alpha and Seagreen Bravo projects

research_value:
Seagreen Phase 1 Offshore Wind Farm; also referred to as Seagreen, Seagreen Phase 1, and historically derived from the consented Seagreen Alpha and Seagreen Bravo projects

research_summary:
The built project is the 114-turbine, 1,075 MW Phase 1 wind farm. Official project material and later variation notices show that the original 2014 consents were for Seagreen Alpha and Seagreen Bravo, while current operational references use Seagreen / Seagreen Phase 1.


wind_farm_id: 6653
canonical_id: 86fef2fd-d0de-465f-afd1-f22e2a672881
wind_farm_name: Seagreen Phase 1 Windfarm
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 9970.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SSE Renewables Agreement for sale of Seagreen transmission assets
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: SSE Renewables led development and construction, supported by TotalEnergies. Current owners: SSE Renewables 49%, TotalEnergies 25.5%, PTTEP 25.5%. Operator: SSE Renewables

resolved_value:
Developer: SSE Renewables led development and construction, supported by TotalEnergies. Current owners: SSE Renewables 49%, TotalEnergies 25.5%, PTTEP 25.5%. Operator: SSE Renewables

citation_url:
https://www.sserenewables.com/news-and-views/2025/03/agreement-for-sale-of-seagreen-transmission-assets/

research_summary:
Freshest ownership confirmation used is 10/03/2025 from SSE Renewables, which states the JV is SSE Renewables 49%, TotalEnergies 25.5%, PTTEP 25.5%. The operator is stated on the current SSE operational asset page.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.sserenewables.com/news-and-views/2025/03/agreement-for-sale-of-seagreen-transmission-assets/


wind_farm_id: 6653
canonical_id: 86fef2fd-d0de-465f-afd1-f22e2a672881
wind_farm_name: Seagreen Phase 1 Windfarm
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://totalenergies.com/system/files/documents/2023-12/PR_farm_down_Seagreen.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: TotalEnergies farm-down announcement
source_of_record_url: https://totalenergies.com/system/files/documents/2023-12/PR_farm_down_Seagreen.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Initially SSE Renewables / TotalEnergies JV; PTTEP acquired a 25.5% stake from TotalEnergies, joining in 2024; current split SSE 49%, TotalEnergies 25.5%, PTTEP 25.5%

research_value:
Initially SSE Renewables / TotalEnergies JV; PTTEP acquired a 25.5% stake from TotalEnergies, joining in 2024; current split SSE 49%, TotalEnergies 25.5%, PTTEP 25.5%

research_summary:
Freshest dated source relied on is 10/03/2025 from SSE. TotalEnergies announced the farm-down to PTTEP on 21/12/2023; current SSE pages state PTTEP joined the consortium in 2024.


wind_farm_id: 6653
canonical_id: 86fef2fd-d0de-465f-afd1-f22e2a672881
wind_farm_name: Seagreen Phase 1 Windfarm
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 9971.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SSE Renewables full-operation announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.sserenewables.com/news-and-views/2023/10/scotland-s-largest-offshore-wind-farm-now-fully-operational/

research_summary:
Multiple official owner/project pages confirm Seagreen became fully operational in October 2023; this maps cleanly to the Boundary Layer status Operational.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.sserenewables.com/news-and-views/2023/10/scotland-s-largest-offshore-wind-farm-now-fully-operational/


wind_farm_id: 6653
canonical_id: 86fef2fd-d0de-465f-afd1-f22e2a672881
wind_farm_name: Seagreen Phase 1 Windfarm
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1,075 MW
resolved_value: 1,075 MW
research_value: 1,075 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9972.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SSE Renewables full-operation announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.sserenewables.com/news-and-views/2023/10/scotland-s-largest-offshore-wind-farm-now-fully-operational/

research_summary:
Official current owner and project sources consistently state Phase 1 capacity as 1,075 MW. This differs from the EMODnet validation context value of 1,140 MW; the web evidence strongly indicates 1,075 MW is the as-built operational Phase 1 figure.


wind_farm_id: 6653
canonical_id: 86fef2fd-d0de-465f-afd1-f22e2a672881
wind_farm_name: Seagreen Phase 1 Windfarm
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1,075 MW
resolved_value: 1,075 MW
research_value: 1,075 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9973.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://sgofto.co.uk/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Seagreen Phase 1 OFTO project site
source_of_record_url: https://sgofto.co.uk/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Open OFTO materials and project transmission-sale material indicate the Phase 1 transmission system exports the full 1,075 MW project output. This is a gross-capacity-equals-MEC case for the built Phase 1 asset.


wind_farm_id: 6653
canonical_id: 86fef2fd-d0de-465f-afd1-f22e2a672881
wind_farm_name: Seagreen Phase 1 Windfarm
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas
resolved_value: Vestas
research_value: Vestas
resolved_fact_id: 9106.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: SSE Renewables full-operation announcement
research_source_type: owner/operator press release
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources show the turbines as Vestas V164-10.0 MW. The 2020 turbine contract page names MHI Vestas Offshore Wind, reflecting the supplier branding at contract stage; the operational project pages use Vestas.


wind_farm_id: 6653
canonical_id: 86fef2fd-d0de-465f-afd1-f22e2a672881
wind_farm_name: Seagreen Phase 1 Windfarm
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 164
resolved_value: 164
research_value: 164 m
resolved_fact_id: 9571.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Seagreen turbine supply contract announcement
research_source_type: project webpage / press release
research_source_url: https://www.seagreenwindenergy.com/post/turbine-supply-contract-for-seagreen-finalised
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources clearly confirm the turbine platform as V164-10.0 MW, which embeds the 164 m rotor designation for this project.


wind_farm_id: 6653
canonical_id: 86fef2fd-d0de-465f-afd1-f22e2a672881
wind_farm_name: Seagreen Phase 1 Windfarm
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 120
resolved_value: 120
research_value: 120 m
resolved_fact_id: 9726.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific accessible web sources reviewed did not clearly state hub height for Seagreen Phase 1. Per the required fallback rule, the linked EuroWindWakes dataset value was used: 120 m.


wind_farm_id: 6653
canonical_id: 86fef2fd-d0de-465f-afd1-f22e2a672881
wind_farm_name: Seagreen Phase 1 Windfarm
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 114
resolved_value: 114
research_value: 114
resolved_fact_id: 47111.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 114 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Seagreen About page
research_source_type: official project webpage
research_source_url: https://www.seagreenwindenergy.com/about-us
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Current official project and owner sources consistently state 114 turbines. This aligns with the non-web validation signal of 114 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations and differs from the EMODnet hint of 75, which is likely outdated or phase-scoped incorrectly.


wind_farm_id: 6653
canonical_id: 86fef2fd-d0de-465f-afd1-f22e2a672881
wind_farm_name: Seagreen Phase 1 Windfarm
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Jacket foundations with suction bucket / suction caisson foundations
resolved_value: Jacket foundations with suction bucket / suction caisson foundations
research_value: Jacket foundations with suction bucket / suction caisson foundations
resolved_fact_id: 9979.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.sserenewables.com/news-and-views/2023/04/final-jacket-foundation-installed-on-seagreen/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SSE Renewables final jacket foundation installed announcement
source_of_record_url: https://www.sserenewables.com/news-and-views/2023/04/final-jacket-foundation-installed-on-seagreen/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific sources confirm Seagreen uses jacket foundations and specifically highlight innovative suction caisson / bucket foundation technology. For precision, the foundation type is best described as jackets supported by suction buckets / suction caissons.


wind_farm_id: 6653
canonical_id: 86fef2fd-d0de-465f-afd1-f22e2a672881
wind_farm_name: Seagreen Phase 1 Windfarm
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 10/10/2014
resolved_value: 10/10/2014
research_value: 10/10/2014
resolved_fact_id: 9980.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.seagreenwindenergy.com/s36capplicationnov2022
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Seagreen S36C application notice
source_of_record_url: https://www.seagreenwindenergy.com/s36capplicationnov2022
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The original Section 36 consents for Seagreen Alpha and Seagreen Bravo were granted on 10 October 2014; this is the operative consent date for the Phase 1 project lineage.


wind_farm_id: 6653
canonical_id: 86fef2fd-d0de-465f-afd1-f22e2a672881
wind_farm_name: Seagreen Phase 1 Windfarm
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 03/06/2020
resolved_value: 03/06/2020
research_value: 03/06/2020
resolved_fact_id: 9981.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.seagreenwindenergy.com/post/turbine-supply-contract-for-seagreen-finalised
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Seagreen turbine supply contract announcement
source_of_record_url: https://www.seagreenwindenergy.com/post/turbine-supply-contract-for-seagreen-finalised
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific Seagreen material states FID was achieved on 03 June 2020. Secondary sector reporting corroborates early June 2020.


wind_farm_id: 6653
canonical_id: 86fef2fd-d0de-465f-afd1-f22e2a672881
wind_farm_name: Seagreen Phase 1 Windfarm
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/08/2022
resolved_value: 01/08/2022
research_value: 01/08/2022
resolved_fact_id: 9982.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SSE Renewables first power announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.sserenewables.com/news-and-views/2022/08/first-power-at-scotlands-largest-offshore-wind-farm/

research_summary:
Official sources consistently state first power was achieved in August 2022. As the source wording is month-level rather than day-specific, the normalized table date is 01/08/2022.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.sserenewables.com/news-and-views/2022/08/first-power-at-scotlands-largest-offshore-wind-farm/


wind_farm_id: 6653
canonical_id: 86fef2fd-d0de-465f-afd1-f22e2a672881
wind_farm_name: Seagreen Phase 1 Windfarm
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2023-10-01
resolved_value: 2023-10-01
research_value: 01/10/2023
resolved_fact_id: 9881.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: SSE Renewables Seagreen operational project page
research_source_type: owner/operator webpage
research_source_url: https://www.sserenewables.com/offshore-wind/operational-wind-farms/seagreen/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Official sources state Seagreen became fully operational in October 2023. As this is month-level wording, the normalized date is 01/10/2023.


wind_farm_id: 6654
canonical_id: 02c5dc33-1983-44ea-a4a6-7e49cff08600
wind_farm_name: Seagreen 1A Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Seagreen 1A Offshore Wind Farm
research_value: Seagreen 1A Offshore Wind Farm
citation_url: https://www.seagreen1a.com/about
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Seagreen 1A project website - About
source_of_record_url: https://www.seagreen1a.com/about
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official project pages describe Seagreen 1A as the second phase of Seagreen, covering the remaining consented turbines and associated Cockenzie connection. Historic phase context is Seagreen Alpha and Seagreen Bravo / Seagreen Phase One under the original 2014 consent; Seagreen 1A is the later name used for the remaining turbines / extension scope.


wind_farm_id: 6654
canonical_id: 02c5dc33-1983-44ea-a4a6-7e49cff08600
wind_farm_name: Seagreen 1A Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 36163.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.seagreen1a.com/about
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Seagreen 1A project website - About
source_of_record_url: https://www.seagreen1a.com/about
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Seagreen Wind Energy Ltd / Seagreen 1A Ltd joint venture of SSE Renewables and TotalEnergies. Current owners: SSE Renewables 49%, TotalEnergies 51%. Operator: SSE Renewables.

resolved_value:
Developer: Seagreen Wind Energy Ltd / Seagreen 1A Ltd joint venture of SSE Renewables and TotalEnergies. Current owners: SSE Renewables 49%, TotalEnergies 51%. Operator: SSE Renewables.

research_summary:
The dedicated Seagreen 1A site says the project is a joint venture between TotalEnergies and SSE Renewables. SSE’s project page also says Seagreen1A is a JV between those parties and that SSE operates Seagreen on behalf of the JV partners. Freshest dated ownership confirmation located is the Seagreen 1A site copyright-2025 page and SSE live project page; both support the 51/49 structure for Seagreen/Seagreen 1A.


wind_farm_id: 6654
canonical_id: 02c5dc33-1983-44ea-a4a6-7e49cff08600
wind_farm_name: Seagreen 1A Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: TotalEnergies press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Originally developed by SSE as sole owner; 03/06/2020 Total acquired 51% of Seagreen 1 and the transaction covered a potential extension opportunity of up to 360 MW; current Seagreen / Seagreen 1A JV is TotalEnergies 51%, SSE Renewables 49%.

research_value:
Originally developed by SSE as sole owner; 03/06/2020 Total acquired 51% of Seagreen 1 and the transaction covered a potential extension opportunity of up to 360 MW; current Seagreen / Seagreen 1A JV is TotalEnergies 51%, SSE Renewables 49%.

citation_url:
https://totalenergies.com/media/news/press-releases/total-enters-giant-offshore-wind-farm-project-scottish-north-sea

research_summary:
Total’s dated press release of 03/06/2020 says Total agreed to acquire 51% of Seagreen 1 and that the purchase agreement also covered a potential extension opportunity of up to 360 MW. The fresh Seagreen 1A and SSE project pages now present Seagreen 1A as the SSE/TotalEnergies JV extension project. Freshest source date relied on for current JV framing is the live 2025/2026 project pages; dated 2020 Total release is used for the ownership-change milestone.

source_of_record_url:
https://totalenergies.com/media/news/press-releases/total-enters-giant-offshore-wind-farm-project-scottish-north-sea


wind_farm_id: 6654
canonical_id: 02c5dc33-1983-44ea-a4a6-7e49cff08600
wind_farm_name: Seagreen 1A Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Consented
resolved_value: Consented
research_value: Consented
resolved_fact_id: 36164.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.seagreen1a.com/news/marine-licence-milestone-for-seagreen-1a
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Seagreen 1A news item
source_of_record_url: https://www.seagreen1a.com/news/marine-licence-milestone-for-seagreen-1a
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Seagreen 1A is not yet built. Official project pages describe it as “in development” and Scottish Ministers have granted the offshore marine licence / consent changes needed for the extension scope. Under the required Boundary Layer labels, the closest exact label is Consented.


wind_farm_id: 6654
canonical_id: 02c5dc33-1983-44ea-a4a6-7e49cff08600
wind_farm_name: Seagreen 1A Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 500 MW
resolved_value: 500 MW
research_value: 500 MW
resolved_fact_id: 36165.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.seagreenwindenergy.com/post/seagreen-s-renewable-energy-output-to-be-maximised
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Seagreen Wind Energy news item
source_of_record_url: https://www.seagreenwindenergy.com/post/seagreen-s-renewable-energy-output-to-be-maximised
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
SSE and Seagreen sources consistently state that Seagreen 1A is up to 500 MW after the 2022 consent variation increased the remaining 36 turbines from 360 MW to up to 500 MW. This matches the database context.


wind_farm_id: 6654
canonical_id: 02c5dc33-1983-44ea-a4a6-7e49cff08600
wind_farm_name: Seagreen 1A Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 500 MW
resolved_value: 500 MW
research_value: 500 MW
resolved_fact_id: 36166.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.seagreenwindenergy.com/post/seagreen-s-renewable-energy-output-to-be-maximised
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Seagreen Wind Energy news item
source_of_record_url: https://www.seagreenwindenergy.com/post/seagreen-s-renewable-energy-output-to-be-maximised
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project documents first referred to a 360 MW Transmission Entry Capacity offer at Cockenzie, but Seagreen’s 14/10/2022 update says National Grid increased the project’s grid connection offer at Cockenzie to 500 MW. For this profile, MEC is taken as 500 MW because that is the updated project connection capacity tied to the consented 500 MW extension.


wind_farm_id: 6654
canonical_id: 02c5dc33-1983-44ea-a4a6-7e49cff08600
wind_farm_name: Seagreen 1A Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.seagreenwindenergy.com/s36capplication2022
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Seagreen S36C application 2022
source_of_record_url: https://www.seagreenwindenergy.com/s36capplication2022
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources confirm only that the remaining 36 turbines will be larger and that turbine parameters such as rotor diameter and hub height were varied; they do not identify a specific OEM model for Seagreen 1A. No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided in the prompt, so the required outcome is Not confirmed rather than inferring from another site or generic OEM material.


wind_farm_id: 6654
canonical_id: 02c5dc33-1983-44ea-a4a6-7e49cff08600
wind_farm_name: Seagreen 1A Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.seagreenwindenergy.com/s36capplication2022
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Seagreen S36C application 2022
source_of_record_url: https://www.seagreenwindenergy.com/s36capplication2022
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible project-specific Seagreen 1A source found during this search explicitly names the OEM for the 36 extension turbines. Existing Seagreen Phase 1 uses Vestas 10 MW turbines, but that cannot be assumed for Seagreen 1A under the prompt rules.


wind_farm_id: 6654
canonical_id: 02c5dc33-1983-44ea-a4a6-7e49cff08600
wind_farm_name: Seagreen 1A Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.seagreenwindenergy.com/post/seagreen-s-renewable-energy-output-to-be-maximised
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Seagreen Wind Energy news item
source_of_record_url: https://www.seagreenwindenergy.com/post/seagreen-s-renewable-energy-output-to-be-maximised
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Web sources support only the aggregate extension capacity change from 360 MW to up to 500 MW for 36 turbines. That implies a different turbine size from Phase 1, but no project-specific source accessed here explicitly states a per-turbine rating. Therefore this remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6654
canonical_id: 02c5dc33-1983-44ea-a4a6-7e49cff08600
wind_farm_name: Seagreen 1A Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.seagreenwindenergy.com/s36capplication2022
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Seagreen S36C application 2022
source_of_record_url: https://www.seagreenwindenergy.com/s36capplication2022
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The 2022 S36C application confirms rotor diameter for the 36 turbines was being increased, but the accessible project webpages do not provide a final machine-checkable as-consented figure for Seagreen 1A itself in a directly accessible official page. No EuroWindWakes fallback was provided.


wind_farm_id: 6654
canonical_id: 02c5dc33-1983-44ea-a4a6-7e49cff08600
wind_farm_name: Seagreen 1A Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.seagreenwindenergy.com/s36capplication2022
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Seagreen S36C application 2022
source_of_record_url: https://www.seagreenwindenergy.com/s36capplication2022
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The S36C application page explicitly says hub height was among the varied parameters for the 36 unbuilt turbines, but the accessible project-specific pages reviewed do not state the final hub height value for Seagreen 1A. Per the rules, hub height is left Not confirmed and is not inferred from turbine platform literature or other projects.


wind_farm_id: 6654
canonical_id: 02c5dc33-1983-44ea-a4a6-7e49cff08600
wind_farm_name: Seagreen 1A Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 36
resolved_value: 36
research_value: 36
resolved_fact_id: 36167.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.seagreen1a.com/about
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Seagreen 1A project website - About
source_of_record_url: https://www.seagreen1a.com/about
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Web sources for Seagreen 1A consistently describe it as the project to build the remaining 36 of the 150 consented turbines, adjacent to the operational 114-turbine Seagreen project. This differs from the provided non-web validation hint of 114; the likely reason is phase scope confusion, because 114 is the built Seagreen Phase 1 count, while Seagreen 1A is the extension / remaining-turbine phase only.


wind_farm_id: 6654
canonical_id: 02c5dc33-1983-44ea-a4a6-7e49cff08600
wind_farm_name: Seagreen 1A Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Three-legged suction caisson foundations proposed
resolved_value: Three-legged suction caisson foundations proposed
research_value: Three-legged suction caisson foundations proposed
resolved_fact_id: 36168.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.sserenewables.com/news-and-views/2024/03/geotechnical-surveys-underway-for-seagreen-1a/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SSE Renewables news item
source_of_record_url: https://www.sserenewables.com/news-and-views/2024/03/geotechnical-surveys-underway-for-seagreen-1a/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The clearest project-specific source found is SSE’s dated 11/03/2024 update, which says proposals for Seagreen 1A turbine foundations include three-legged suction caisson technology similar to the original Seagreen project. This is still proposal-stage wording, but it is project-specific and authoritative.


wind_farm_id: 6654
canonical_id: 02c5dc33-1983-44ea-a4a6-7e49cff08600
wind_farm_name: Seagreen 1A Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 10/10/2022
resolved_value: 10/10/2022
research_value: 10/10/2022
resolved_fact_id: 36169.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate public notice PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/seagreen_-_section_36_consent_and_marine_licence_variation_-_public_notice.pdf

research_summary:
The relevant Seagreen 1A extension consent milestone is the Section 36C variation granted in October 2022 increasing the remaining 36 turbines from 360 MW to up to 500 MW. Earlier 10/10/2014 consent related to Seagreen Phase One / Alpha and Bravo, not the 1A extension framing.

source_of_record_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/seagreen_-_section_36_consent_and_marine_licence_variation_-_public_notice.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6654
canonical_id: 02c5dc33-1983-44ea-a4a6-7e49cff08600
wind_farm_name: Seagreen 1A Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.sserenewables.com/offshore-wind/projects/seagreen1a/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SSE Renewables Seagreen1A page
source_of_record_url: https://www.sserenewables.com/offshore-wind/projects/seagreen1a/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible official source found in this search states that a project-specific FID has been taken for Seagreen 1A. SSE’s project page only states that FID in early June 2020 was for installing the first 114 turbines of operational Seagreen, not for Seagreen 1A.


wind_farm_id: 6654
canonical_id: 02c5dc33-1983-44ea-a4a6-7e49cff08600
wind_farm_name: Seagreen 1A Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.seagreen1a.com/about
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Seagreen 1A project website - About
source_of_record_url: https://www.seagreen1a.com/about
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Seagreen 1A is not yet operational and no first-power date is reported in the reviewed official sources.


wind_farm_id: 6655
canonical_id: 7be3bc36-7e47-489a-ab4d-15376b695922
wind_farm_name: Cedar
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Cedar Offshore Wind Farm; also referred to as Cedar floating offshore wind project / Cedar (NSRG)
research_value: Cedar Offshore Wind Farm; also referred to as Cedar floating offshore wind project / Cedar (NSRG)
citation_url: https://ceruleanwinds.com/north-sea-renewables-grid-nsrg/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cerulean Winds NSRG page
source_of_record_url: https://ceruleanwinds.com/north-sea-renewables-grid-nsrg/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Cerulean’s NSRG material explicitly names Aspen, Beech and Cedar as the three connected wind farms. Marine Scotland/Marine Directorate documents also identify Cedar OWF / Cedar (North Sea Renewables Grid (NSRG)) as a distinct project.


wind_farm_id: 6655
canonical_id: 7be3bc36-7e47-489a-ab4d-15376b695922
wind_farm_name: Cedar
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34191.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Aspen Offshore Wind Farm scoping report
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Cerulean Winds (UKCS) Limited / Cerulean Winds group; Current owner(s): Not confirmed; Equity partners and percentages: Not confirmed; Operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: Cerulean Winds (UKCS) Limited / Cerulean Winds group; Current owner(s): Not confirmed; Equity partners and percentages: Not confirmed; Operator: Not confirmed

citation_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/aspen_owf_appendix_6.1_offshore_scoping_report_final.pdf

research_summary:
Freshest developer evidence used is the Aspen offshore scoping report published 2025, which states Cerulean Winds (UKCS) Limited was the successful bidder for Aspen, Beech and Cedar. Cerulean’s 28/11/2023 post confirms it signed the three exclusivity agreements. I did not infer a current equity split or operator because no project-specific official source found here reconciles full current ownership percentages for Cedar alone.


wind_farm_id: 6655
canonical_id: 7be3bc36-7e47-489a-ab4d-15376b695922
wind_farm_name: Cedar
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://ceruleanwinds.com/cerulean-winds-wins-bid-for-three-intog-floating-wind-sites/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cerulean wins bid for three INTOG sites
source_of_record_url: https://ceruleanwinds.com/cerulean-winds-wins-bid-for-three-intog-floating-wind-sites/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
24/03/2023 lease award / successful INTOG bid to Cerulean Winds and Frontier Power International; 28/11/2023 exclusivity agreements signed; later current project-level equity split not confirmed

research_value:
24/03/2023 lease award / successful INTOG bid to Cerulean Winds and Frontier Power International; 28/11/2023 exclusivity agreements signed; later current project-level equity split not confirmed

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on for ownership history is the 2025 Aspen scoping report, which says Cerulean Winds was the successful bidder in the 2022 INTOG round and received exclusivity agreements in 2023. Cerulean’s 24/03/2023 announcement named Cerulean Winds and Frontier Power International as awardees for three Central North Sea lease options. No newer official Cedar-specific source found that clearly sets out a current ownership split summing to 100%.


wind_farm_id: 6655
canonical_id: 7be3bc36-7e47-489a-ab4d-15376b695922
wind_farm_name: Cedar
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
resolved_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
research_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
resolved_fact_id: 34192.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cerulean exclusivity agreements news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://ceruleanwinds.com/cerulean-winds-signs-exclusivity-agreements-for-trio-of-uk-floating-wind-sites/

research_summary:
Best fit Boundary Layer label is Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning. Cedar has INTOG lease/exclusivity history and is clearly in development, but the accessible formal pre-application filing found in 2025 is for Aspen, while Cedar is described in third-party official planning context as a future phase / pre-application early development project.

source_of_record_url:
https://ceruleanwinds.com/cerulean-winds-signs-exclusivity-agreements-for-trio-of-uk-floating-wind-sites/


wind_farm_id: 6655
canonical_id: 7be3bc36-7e47-489a-ab4d-15376b695922
wind_farm_name: Cedar
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1008 MW
resolved_value: 1008 MW
research_value: 1008 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34193.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine gov.scot cumulative effects screening excerpt
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/volume_3_-_technical_reports_-_appendix_6.4_-_cumulative_effects_screening.pdf

research_summary:
Multiple sources align on 1008 MW for Cedar. Marine planning context explicitly states “Cedar Offshore Wind Farm is proposed for up to 1008MW” and other Marine Directorate EIA context lists Cedar … 1,008 MW.

source_of_record_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/volume_3_-_technical_reports_-_appendix_6.4_-_cumulative_effects_screening.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6655
canonical_id: 7be3bc36-7e47-489a-ab4d-15376b695922
wind_farm_name: Cedar
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ceruleanwinds.com/north-sea-renewables-grid-nsrg/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cerulean Winds NSRG page
source_of_record_url: https://ceruleanwinds.com/north-sea-renewables-grid-nsrg/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible project-specific official source found that gives a Cedar-specific MEC distinct from gross/planned installed capacity. Available sources discuss gross capacity and the wider NSRG concept, not a confirmed Cedar MEC.


wind_farm_id: 6655
canonical_id: 7be3bc36-7e47-489a-ab4d-15376b695922
wind_farm_name: Cedar
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ceruleanwinds.com/north-sea-renewables-grid-nsrg/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cerulean Winds NSRG page
source_of_record_url: https://ceruleanwinds.com/north-sea-renewables-grid-nsrg/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine row was provided for Cedar, and the accessible project-specific web sources reviewed do not confirm a Cedar turbine model. Per instruction, this remains Not confirmed rather than inferred from other Cerulean material or generic OEM platforms.


wind_farm_id: 6655
canonical_id: 7be3bc36-7e47-489a-ab4d-15376b695922
wind_farm_name: Cedar
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ceruleanwinds.com/north-sea-renewables-grid-nsrg/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cerulean Winds NSRG page
source_of_record_url: https://ceruleanwinds.com/north-sea-renewables-grid-nsrg/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific source found naming an OEM for Cedar. I did not infer OEM from consortium partners or other projects.


wind_farm_id: 6655
canonical_id: 7be3bc36-7e47-489a-ab4d-15376b695922
wind_farm_name: Cedar
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
research_summary: No project-specific Cedar source confirms turbine rating.
source_of_record_name: Cerulean ecological surveys update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://ceruleanwinds.com/cerulean-winds-completes-ecological-surveys-across-2784-km%C2%B2-floating-offshore-wind-project-area/

source_of_record_url:
https://ceruleanwinds.com/cerulean-winds-completes-ecological-surveys-across-2784-km%C2%B2-floating-offshore-wind-project-area/


