# wind_farm_dossier_fields

wind_farm_id: 6442
canonical_id: 127f1c56-53ec-4412-a391-171f2d823baa
wind_farm_name: Nordre Flint
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: 06/03/2019 onward: HOFOR-led project; later full ownership structure not confirmed
research_value: 06/03/2019 onward: HOFOR-led project; later full ownership structure not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/presse/hofor-faar-forundersoegelsestilladelser-til-havvindmoelleprojekter-i-oeresund
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/presse/hofor-faar-forundersoegelsestilladelser-til-havvindmoelleprojekter-i-oeresund
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on for history/status context is the Danish Energy Agency open-door page noting processing resumed on 20/03/2023. Earlier official DEA press material from 06/03/2019 granted HOFOR pre-investigation permission. No newer dated authoritative source was found that sets out a changed ownership structure or percentages for the full project partnership.


wind_farm_id: 6442
canonical_id: 127f1c56-53ec-4412-a391-171f2d823baa
wind_farm_name: Nordre Flint
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
research_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_fact_id: 42149.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.hofor.dk/baeredygtige-byer/vind-og-sol/spoergsmaal-og-svar-om-vindmoeller/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: HOFOR Q&A page
source_of_record_url: https://www.hofor.dk/baeredygtige-byer/vind-og-sol/spoergsmaal-og-svar-om-vindmoeller/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Best-fit Boundary Layer status. Official sources confirm pre-investigation permission was granted in 2019, and current HOFOR public pages still describe Nordre Flint as a planned offshore wind farm. HOFOR’s 2022 statement further says “Nordre Flint-projektet er ... endnu i en dialogfase” with Copenhagen Airport and aviation authorities. The project does not appear to have an establishment permit, FID, or construction start confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6442
canonical_id: 127f1c56-53ec-4412-a391-171f2d823baa
wind_farm_name: Nordre Flint
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 160 MW
resolved_value: 160 MW
research_value: 160 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42150.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/presse/hofor-faar-forundersoegelsestilladelser-til-havvindmoelleprojekter-i-oeresund
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/presse/hofor-faar-forundersoegelsestilladelser-til-havvindmoelleprojekter-i-oeresund
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Consistent across official and secondary sources. DEA’s 2019 press release says Nordre Flint covers up to 160 MW, and project technical documents also state installed capacity of up to 160 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6442
canonical_id: 127f1c56-53ec-4412-a391-171f2d823baa
wind_farm_name: Nordre Flint
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/havvindmoeller/havvindmoelleprojekter-i-pipeline
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency pipeline page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/havvindmoeller/havvindmoelleprojekter-i-pipeline
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I found no accessible authoritative source explicitly stating a project MEC/export capacity distinct from gross planned capacity.


wind_farm_id: 6442
canonical_id: 127f1c56-53ec-4412-a391-171f2d823baa
wind_farm_name: Nordre Flint
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/3863/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ENS technical report
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/3863/download
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific authoritative source found naming a selected as-built or contracted turbine model. Available material only discusses turbine size ranges/scenarios, not a chosen model. No linked EuroWindWakes turbine row was provided, so fallback is unavailable.


wind_farm_id: 6442
canonical_id: 127f1c56-53ec-4412-a391-171f2d823baa
wind_farm_name: Nordre Flint
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 5.5–10.0 MW (planned range, not final selection)
resolved_value: 5.5–10.0 MW (planned range, not final selection)
research_value: 5.5–10.0 MW (planned range, not final selection)
resolved_fact_id: 42151.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/3863/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ENS technical report
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/3863/download
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific technical material says Nordre Flint could use layouts based on 5.5–6.5 MW or 9.5–10.0 MW turbines, while the 2019 DEA press release gave a broader early range of 4–10 MW. I therefore report the narrower project-report planning range, but note that no final turbine selection is confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6442
canonical_id: 127f1c56-53ec-4412-a391-171f2d823baa
wind_farm_name: Nordre Flint
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/presse/hofor-faar-forundersoegelsestilladelser-til-havvindmoelleprojekter-i-oeresund
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/presse/hofor-faar-forundersoegelsestilladelser-til-havvindmoelleprojekter-i-oeresund
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific authoritative source explicitly confirms hub height. The official material I found mentions maximum total height to blade tip, not hub height; per instruction, hub height is not inferred from turbine platform or total height.


wind_farm_id: 6442
canonical_id: 127f1c56-53ec-4412-a391-171f2d823baa
wind_farm_name: Nordre Flint
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 16–29 (planned range, not final count)
resolved_value: 16–29 (planned range, not final count)
research_value: 16–29 (planned range, not final count)
resolved_fact_id: 42152.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/3863/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ENS technical report
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/3863/download
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific ENS technical material says the wind farm will comprise 16–29 offshore wind turbines, depending on turbine capacity; DEA’s 2019 press release gave an earlier wider envelope of up to 16–40. The web-sourced figure therefore differs from the database validation signal of 0, which likely reflects an outdated placeholder/concept-stage dataset value rather than an evidence-based turbine count.


wind_farm_id: 6442
canonical_id: 127f1c56-53ec-4412-a391-171f2d823baa
wind_farm_name: Nordre Flint
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ramboll/HOFOR consulting announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://w3.windfair.net/wind-energy/pr/37976-ramboll-denmark-offshore-wind-farm-construction-consulting-aflandshage-nordre-flint-copenhagen-capital-co2-household-turbine-foundation

research_summary:
HOFOR/Ramboll material confirms foundation engineering work, but I did not find an accessible authoritative source explicitly naming the selected foundation type for Nordre Flint specifically.

source_of_record_url:
https://w3.windfair.net/wind-energy/pr/37976-ramboll-denmark-offshore-wind-farm-construction-consulting-aflandshage-nordre-flint-copenhagen-capital-co2-household-turbine-foundation


wind_farm_id: 6442
canonical_id: 127f1c56-53ec-4412-a391-171f2d823baa
wind_farm_name: Nordre Flint
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.hofor.dk/nyhed/hofor-vigtige-havvindmoeller-risikerer-at-falde-paa-maalstregen/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: HOFOR article, 2022
source_of_record_url: https://www.hofor.dk/nyhed/hofor-vigtige-havvindmoeller-risikerer-at-falde-paa-maalstregen/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No establishment permit / consent date was found for Nordre Flint. Official sources found here confirm only forundersøgelsestilladelse in March 2019 and that the project remains planned / in dialogue rather than consented.


wind_farm_id: 6442
canonical_id: 127f1c56-53ec-4412-a391-171f2d823baa
wind_farm_name: Nordre Flint
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.hofor.dk/nyhed/hofor-vigtige-havvindmoeller-risikerer-at-falde-paa-maalstregen/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: HOFOR article, 2022
source_of_record_url: https://www.hofor.dk/nyhed/hofor-vigtige-havvindmoeller-risikerer-at-falde-paa-maalstregen/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No authoritative source found confirming FID. Current official/developer evidence still places Nordre Flint in planning/dialogue rather than post-FID execution.


wind_farm_id: 6442
canonical_id: 127f1c56-53ec-4412-a391-171f2d823baa
wind_farm_name: Nordre Flint
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/havvindmoeller/havvindmoelleprojekter-i-pipeline
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency pipeline page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/havvindmoeller/havvindmoelleprojekter-i-pipeline
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No authoritative source found confirming commissioning. Secondary forecast dates exist in trade/database summaries but are not supported by current official permitting evidence.


wind_farm_id: 6445
canonical_id: 49f8ebdc-2a1b-4839-9326-0e78f3ded072
wind_farm_name: Aflandshage
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Aflandshage Vindmøllepark
research_value: Aflandshage Vindmøllepark
citation_url: https://www.hofor.dk/aflandshage-vindmoellepark/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: HOFOR project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.hofor.dk/aflandshage-vindmoellepark/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The official project name used by both HOFOR and the Danish Energy Agency is Aflandshage Vindmøllepark. English-language regulator/project documents also use Aflandshage Wind farm / Aflandshage OWF.


wind_farm_id: 6445
canonical_id: 49f8ebdc-2a1b-4839-9326-0e78f3ded072
wind_farm_name: Aflandshage
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 42155.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-godkender-forundersoegelser-aflandshage-vindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency preliminary-investigation approval
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-godkender-forundersoegelser-aflandshage-vindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: HOFOR Vind A/S / HOFOR. Current owner(s): Not confirmed beyond HOFOR project company control. Operator: Not confirmed separately from HOFOR.

resolved_value:
Developer: HOFOR Vind A/S / HOFOR. Current owner(s): Not confirmed beyond HOFOR project company control. Operator: Not confirmed separately from HOFOR.

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on: HOFOR project page status section for 2025. HOFOR is explicitly identified as project developer/applicant in regulator notices and continues to present the project as its own. I found no newer dated authoritative source showing a changed equity partnership, owner split, or a separate operator, so those remain Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6445
canonical_id: 49f8ebdc-2a1b-4839-9326-0e78f3ded072
wind_farm_name: Aflandshage
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency resumed-processing notice
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
HOFOR developed and applied for the project; no confirmed transfer or multi-owner JV identified in accessible current authoritative sources.

research_value:
HOFOR developed and applied for the project; no confirmed transfer or multi-owner JV identified in accessible current authoritative sources.

citation_url:
https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-har-genoptaget-sagsbehandlingen-af-havvindmoelleprojekter-under-aaben-doer

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on: 2025 HOFOR project page, supported by 03/03/2023 DEA notice and earlier HOFOR news. The accessible authoritative record shows HOFOR/HOFOR Vind A/S throughout development and permitting. No dated official source found confirming any later sale, farm-down, or reconciled ownership percentages summing to 100%, so ownership history beyond HOFOR-led development is Not confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-har-genoptaget-sagsbehandlingen-af-havvindmoelleprojekter-under-aaben-doer


wind_farm_id: 6445
canonical_id: 49f8ebdc-2a1b-4839-9326-0e78f3ded072
wind_farm_name: Aflandshage
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Concept
resolved_value: Concept
research_value: Concept
resolved_fact_id: 42156.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.hofor.dk/aflandshage-vindmoellepark/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: HOFOR project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.hofor.dk/aflandshage-vindmoellepark/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project had a preliminary-investigation approval in 2022 and an establishment permit on 11/11/2022, but HOFOR states that the permit was withdrawn in 2023, the investment was put on hold on 03/11/2023, and the project’s future is “uafklaret” while HOFOR seeks a route to obtain a new permit. That is no longer well described as “Consented”; among the required Boundary Layer labels, Concept is the closest fit for a live but non-consented project.


wind_farm_id: 6445
canonical_id: 49f8ebdc-2a1b-4839-9326-0e78f3ded072
wind_farm_name: Aflandshage
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 300 MW planned
resolved_value: Up to 300 MW planned
research_value: Up to 300 MW planned
resolved_fact_id: 42157.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.hofor.dk/aflandshage-vindmoellepark/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: HOFOR project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.hofor.dk/aflandshage-vindmoellepark/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current HOFOR and the 13/06/2022 DEA page both support up to 300 MW as the project envelope. The later 11/11/2022 establishment-permit notice narrowed this to 247–286 MW based on 26 turbines of 9.5–11 MW. For the project profile’s planned capacity, the best current reading is up to 300 MW planned, with later permitted layout narrower.


wind_farm_id: 6445
canonical_id: 49f8ebdc-2a1b-4839-9326-0e78f3ded072
wind_farm_name: Aflandshage
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-godkender-forundersoegelser-aflandshage-vindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency preliminary-investigation approval
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-godkender-forundersoegelser-aflandshage-vindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I found accessible sources describing installed/planned generation capacity and 132 kV grid connection, but no authoritative accessible source explicitly states a separate MEC/export-cap value for Aflandshage.


wind_farm_id: 6445
canonical_id: 49f8ebdc-2a1b-4839-9326-0e78f3ded072
wind_farm_name: Aflandshage
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.hofor.dk/aflandshage-vindmoellepark/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: HOFOR project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.hofor.dk/aflandshage-vindmoellepark/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources do not confirm a final turbine model. A 17/04/2023 HOFOR announcement said Siemens Gamesa would supply 26 turbines, but the 2025 HOFOR status update says the originally included turbines “ikke længere er i produktion,” so the model cannot be treated as current/confirmed. No EuroWindWakes linked turbine row was provided, so fallback is unavailable.


wind_farm_id: 6445
canonical_id: 49f8ebdc-2a1b-4839-9326-0e78f3ded072
wind_farm_name: Aflandshage
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.hofor.dk/nyhed/hofor-og-siemens-gamesa-sikrer-groen-stroem-i-oeresundsregionen/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: HOFOR Siemens Gamesa contract announcement
source_of_record_url: https://www.hofor.dk/nyhed/hofor-og-siemens-gamesa-sikrer-groen-stroem-i-oeresundsregionen/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
HOFOR announced Siemens Gamesa as contracted supplier in April 2023, but the 2025 project page says the originally included turbines are no longer in production and HOFOR is discussing use of updated turbines. Because the project is on hold and a new permit path may alter the turbine package, current OEM is Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6445
canonical_id: 49f8ebdc-2a1b-4839-9326-0e78f3ded072
wind_farm_name: Aflandshage
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 9.5–11 MW (per revoked 2022 permitted layout)
resolved_value: 9.5–11 MW (per revoked 2022 permitted layout)
research_value: 9.5–11 MW (per revoked 2022 permitted layout)
resolved_fact_id: 42158.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-udsteder-etableringstilladelse-til-aflandshage-vindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency permit notice
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-udsteder-etableringstilladelse-til-aflandshage-vindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The clearest project-specific technical figure is from the 11/11/2022 DEA establishment-permit notice: turbines “på 9,5-11MW”. Because the project is now on hold and turbine selection may change, this should be read as the last permitted project envelope rather than final as-built spec.


wind_farm_id: 6445
canonical_id: 49f8ebdc-2a1b-4839-9326-0e78f3ded072
wind_farm_name: Aflandshage
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 200 m (large WTG envelope in project EIA)
resolved_value: Up to 200 m (large WTG envelope in project EIA)
research_value: Up to 200 m (large WTG envelope in project EIA)
resolved_fact_id: 42159.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/3859/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Aflandshage technical project description PDF
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/3859/download
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No current final turbine model is confirmed. The project-specific technical description used in the EIA gives the large WTG (9.5–11.0 MW) rotor diameter as up to 200 m in the maximum-dimensions case. This is a project-specific envelope, not an as-built confirmed rotor.


wind_farm_id: 6445
canonical_id: 49f8ebdc-2a1b-4839-9326-0e78f3ded072
wind_farm_name: Aflandshage
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 120 m (large WTG envelope in project EIA)
resolved_value: Up to 120 m (large WTG envelope in project EIA)
research_value: Up to 120 m (large WTG envelope in project EIA)
resolved_fact_id: 42160.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/3859/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Aflandshage technical project description PDF
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/3859/download
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No final turbine is confirmed. The project-specific technical description gives the large WTG (9.5–11.0 MW) hub height as 120 m in the maximum-dimensions case, with other large-WTG combinations at 106 m, 117 m, and 136 m. To avoid false precision, I report the project-specific envelope figure up to 120 m tied to the 220 m / 200 m large-WTG case referenced by the permit pathway.


wind_farm_id: 6445
canonical_id: 49f8ebdc-2a1b-4839-9326-0e78f3ded072
wind_farm_name: Aflandshage
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 26
resolved_value: Up to 26
research_value: Up to 26
resolved_fact_id: 42161.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-udsteder-etableringstilladelse-til-aflandshage-vindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency permit notice
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-udsteder-etableringstilladelse-til-aflandshage-vindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current authoritative sources support up to 26 for the latest permitted/project-on-hold layout. This differs from the provided EMODnet validation signal of 0; the likely reason is that EMODnet is lagging or reflects a non-built/concept geometry rather than the last permitted design. Earlier 2022 regulator material also mentioned a broader 25–45 turbine envelope before the 26-turbine layout was permitted.


wind_farm_id: 6445
canonical_id: 49f8ebdc-2a1b-4839-9326-0e78f3ded072
wind_farm_name: Aflandshage
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile foundations
resolved_value: Monopile foundations
research_value: Monopile foundations
resolved_fact_id: 42162.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/3859/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Aflandshage technical project description PDF
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/3859/download
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
HOFOR’s current project page says turbines will be installed on foundations standing on the seabed and surrounded by stones; the project-specific technical description explicitly includes monopile foundations and provides detailed monopile dimensions/scour ranges. I found no equally strong project-specific evidence for a final alternative foundation selection.


wind_farm_id: 6445
canonical_id: 49f8ebdc-2a1b-4839-9326-0e78f3ded072
wind_farm_name: Aflandshage
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 11/11/2022
resolved_value: 11/11/2022
research_value: 11/11/2022
resolved_fact_id: 42163.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-udsteder-etableringstilladelse-til-aflandshage-vindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency permit notice
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-udsteder-etableringstilladelse-til-aflandshage-vindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The Danish Energy Agency states it issued the establishment permit on 11 November 2022. This consent was later revoked, but that remains the documented consent date.


wind_farm_id: 6445
canonical_id: 49f8ebdc-2a1b-4839-9326-0e78f3ded072
wind_farm_name: Aflandshage
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.hofor.dk/nyhed/hofors-investering-i-oeresunds-havvindprojekt-bliver-sat-i-bero/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: HOFOR hold announcement
source_of_record_url: https://www.hofor.dk/nyhed/hofors-investering-i-oeresunds-havvindprojekt-bliver-sat-i-bero/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No authoritative accessible source confirms a formal FID. HOFOR’s 03/11/2023 statement instead says the investment was put on hold and contracts could not be triggered.


wind_farm_id: 6445
canonical_id: 49f8ebdc-2a1b-4839-9326-0e78f3ded072
wind_farm_name: Aflandshage
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.hofor.dk/aflandshage-vindmoellepark/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: HOFOR project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.hofor.dk/aflandshage-vindmoellepark/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project is not under construction and HOFOR says the future is unresolved, so no first-power milestone is confirmed. Earlier target dates in older sources were superseded by the permit revocation and hold decision.


wind_farm_id: 6445
canonical_id: 49f8ebdc-2a1b-4839-9326-0e78f3ded072
wind_farm_name: Aflandshage
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.hofor.dk/aflandshage-vindmoellepark/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: HOFOR project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.hofor.dk/aflandshage-vindmoellepark/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No current commissioning date is confirmed because the project is on hold pending a renewed permitting path. Older target dates are obsolete.


wind_farm_id: 6446
canonical_id: b5940a2c-c8e0-4003-b992-5f8c864d4191
wind_farm_name: Lillebklt Syd
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Lillebælt Syd Vindmøllepark; alternative English rendering: Lillebælt South / Little Belt South
research_value: Lillebælt Syd Vindmøllepark; alternative English rendering: Lillebælt South / Little Belt South
citation_url: https://lillebaeltsyd.dk/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Lillebælt Syd official project website
source_of_record_url: https://lillebaeltsyd.dk/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official project site uses Lillebælt Syd Vindmøllepark. Recent owner/developer press releases also refer to the same asset as Lillebælt South in English.


wind_farm_id: 6446
canonical_id: b5940a2c-c8e0-4003-b992-5f8c864d4191
wind_farm_name: Lillebklt Syd
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 42265.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://lillebaeltsyd.dk/totalenergies-er-majoritetsejer-af-lillebaelt-syd/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Lillebælt Syd project news
source_of_record_url: https://lillebaeltsyd.dk/totalenergies-er-majoritetsejer-af-lillebaelt-syd/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer/project company: Lillebælt Vind A/S. Current owners: TotalEnergies 72.25%, SONFOR 15.00%, European Energy 12.75%. Operator: TotalEnergies

resolved_value:
Developer/project company: Lillebælt Vind A/S. Current owners: TotalEnergies 72.25%, SONFOR 15.00%, European Energy 12.75%. Operator: TotalEnergies

research_summary:
Freshest ownership source used is the project-site ownership update/closing in 20/12/2024, supported by SONFOR’s 23/01/2024 deal announcement and the project site’s owner page. The January 2024 transaction announcement showed the intended split; the December 2024 closing confirms TotalEnergies became majority owner, and the project page states TotalEnergies, European Energy and SONFOR are the parties behind the project.


wind_farm_id: 6446
canonical_id: b5940a2c-c8e0-4003-b992-5f8c864d4191
wind_farm_name: Lillebklt Syd
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://lillebaeltsyd.dk/ejerne/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Lillebælt Syd owners page
source_of_record_url: https://lillebaeltsyd.dk/ejerne/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
SONFOR originally sole developer; European Energy joined in 2022; TotalEnergies agreed to acquire majority in 01/2024 and closing completed 20/12/2024

research_value:
SONFOR originally sole developer; European Energy joined in 2022; TotalEnergies agreed to acquire majority in 01/2024 and closing completed 20/12/2024

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on is 20/12/2024 from European Energy / project-site closing announcements. Ownership history is consistently described across the project owner page and SONFOR/European Energy releases: SONFOR started the project, European Energy became co-owner in 2022, then TotalEnergies took the majority stake in 2024.


wind_farm_id: 6446
canonical_id: b5940a2c-c8e0-4003-b992-5f8c864d4191
wind_farm_name: Lillebklt Syd
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Consented
resolved_value: Consented
research_value: Consented
resolved_fact_id: 42266.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-giver-tilladelse-til-etablere-lillebaelt-syd-vindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-giver-tilladelse-til-etablere-lillebaelt-syd-vindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Danish Energy Agency granted the construction permit on 28/11/2024. Appeals were upheld in favour of the project on 23/05/2025, but the project is still in surveys/design and the site timetable places construction in 2028-2029, so the closest Boundary Layer label is Consented rather than under construction.


wind_farm_id: 6446
canonical_id: b5940a2c-c8e0-4003-b992-5f8c864d4191
wind_farm_name: Lillebklt Syd
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 165 MW
resolved_value: 165 MW
research_value: 165 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42267.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-giver-tilladelse-til-etablere-lillebaelt-syd-vindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-giver-tilladelse-til-etablere-lillebaelt-syd-vindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current project sources consistently state 165 MW. This differs slightly from the EMODnet fallback row value of 160 MW and appears to reflect an older project stage; current project-specific and regulator sources support 165 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6446
canonical_id: b5940a2c-c8e0-4003-b992-5f8c864d4191
wind_farm_name: Lillebklt Syd
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Lillebælt Syd public meeting presentation
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://lillebaeltsyd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/praesentation-borgermoede-om-vaerditab-og-koeberet-20-januar-2025.pdf

research_summary:
Open web sources clearly confirm installed/planned generation capacity, but I did not find a project-specific authoritative source explicitly stating a separate grid MEC figure. Available sources describe 66 kV collection and 150 kV onward transmission rather than a named MEC value, so this remains Not confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://lillebaeltsyd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/praesentation-borgermoede-om-vaerditab-og-koeberet-20-januar-2025.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6446
canonical_id: b5940a2c-c8e0-4003-b992-5f8c864d4191
wind_farm_name: Lillebklt Syd
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://lillebaeltsyd.dk/om/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Lillebælt Syd about page
source_of_record_url: https://lillebaeltsyd.dk/om/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources confirm 11 turbines of 15 MW each and geometry values, but I did not find an authoritative source explicitly naming the turbine model for Lillebælt Syd. Per instruction, model is left Not confirmed rather than inferred from the 15 MW/236 m combination.


wind_farm_id: 6446
canonical_id: b5940a2c-c8e0-4003-b992-5f8c864d4191
wind_farm_name: Lillebklt Syd
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-giver-tilladelse-til-etablere-lillebaelt-syd-vindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-giver-tilladelse-til-etablere-lillebaelt-syd-vindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No authoritative project-specific source located names the OEM for Lillebælt Syd. Left as Not confirmed to avoid inferring from generic turbine platforms.


wind_farm_id: 6446
canonical_id: b5940a2c-c8e0-4003-b992-5f8c864d4191
wind_farm_name: Lillebklt Syd
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 15 MW
resolved_value: 15 MW
research_value: 15 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42268.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/3662/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency project description PDF
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/3662/download
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Confirmed directly by the project site, regulator documentation, and the 20/01/2025 public presentation.


wind_farm_id: 6446
canonical_id: b5940a2c-c8e0-4003-b992-5f8c864d4191
wind_farm_name: Lillebklt Syd
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 236 m
resolved_value: 236 m
research_value: 236 m
resolved_fact_id: 42269.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Lillebælt Syd public meeting presentation
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://lillebaeltsyd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/praesentation-borgermoede-om-vaerditab-og-koeberet-20-januar-2025.pdf

research_summary:
Confirmed in the 20/01/2025 project presentation prepared for the local compensation/ownership meeting. I did not find a second equally direct public source stating rotor diameter, so one authoritative project-specific source is used here, with supporting project material for the same design envelope.


wind_farm_id: 6446
canonical_id: b5940a2c-c8e0-4003-b992-5f8c864d4191
wind_farm_name: Lillebklt Syd
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Lillebælt Syd public meeting presentation
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Public project sources found here confirm total height 256 m and rotor diameter 236 m, but I did not locate a project-specific source explicitly stating hub height as a labeled value. Per instruction, hub height is Not confirmed rather than derived by subtraction.


wind_farm_id: 6446
canonical_id: b5940a2c-c8e0-4003-b992-5f8c864d4191
wind_farm_name: Lillebklt Syd
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 11
resolved_value: 11
research_value: 11
resolved_fact_id: 42270.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-giver-tilladelse-til-etablere-lillebaelt-syd-vindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-giver-tilladelse-til-etablere-lillebaelt-syd-vindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current regulator and project sources consistently say 11 turbines. This differs from the database validation signal of 0 in the EMODnet fallback row; the web evidence strongly indicates EMODnet’s turbine-count hint is outdated or unpopulated for this concept-to-consented transition.


wind_farm_id: 6446
canonical_id: b5940a2c-c8e0-4003-b992-5f8c864d4191
wind_farm_name: Lillebklt Syd
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile
resolved_value: Monopile
research_value: Monopile
resolved_fact_id: 42271.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-giver-tilladelse-til-etablere-lillebaelt-syd-vindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-giver-tilladelse-til-etablere-lillebaelt-syd-vindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Both the Danish Energy Agency and project construction materials explicitly state monopiles/monopæle.


wind_farm_id: 6446
canonical_id: b5940a2c-c8e0-4003-b992-5f8c864d4191
wind_farm_name: Lillebklt Syd
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 28/11/2024
resolved_value: 28/11/2024
research_value: 28/11/2024
resolved_fact_id: 42272.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-giver-tilladelse-til-etablere-lillebaelt-syd-vindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-giver-tilladelse-til-etablere-lillebaelt-syd-vindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Treated here as the main project construction consent / establishment permit date. The DEA also approved the EIA/report on 07/02/2024, but the project-specific establishment consent was granted on 28/11/2024.


wind_farm_id: 6446
canonical_id: b5940a2c-c8e0-4003-b992-5f8c864d4191
wind_farm_name: Lillebklt Syd
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://lillebaeltsyd.dk/etablering/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Lillebælt Syd establishment page
source_of_record_url: https://lillebaeltsyd.dk/etablering/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project’s own timeline says the business case work will form the basis for the future investment decision, and 2025 survey news says site investigations are still ongoing before final design decisions. No authoritative source found confirms FID has been taken.


wind_farm_id: 6446
canonical_id: b5940a2c-c8e0-4003-b992-5f8c864d4191
wind_farm_name: Lillebklt Syd
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://lillebaeltsyd.dk/etablering/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Lillebælt Syd establishment page
source_of_record_url: https://lillebaeltsyd.dk/etablering/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No source found confirms first power has occurred. Current schedule material suggests offshore installation in early 2029 and operation in 2029, but not a dated first-power milestone.


wind_farm_id: 6446
canonical_id: b5940a2c-c8e0-4003-b992-5f8c864d4191
wind_farm_name: Lillebklt Syd
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/01/2029
resolved_value: 01/01/2029
research_value: 01/01/2029
resolved_fact_id: 42273.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://lillebaeltsyd.dk/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Lillebælt Syd official project website
source_of_record_url: https://lillebaeltsyd.dk/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current project sources only support 2029 as the expected operational/start-of-production year. Following the normalization rule for year-only evidence, this is recorded as 01/01/2029 and should be read as a year-level expected commissioning target, not a day-specific as-built date.


wind_farm_id: 6447
canonical_id: b6a974fc-045e-437c-8735-c2690ee05e71
wind_farm_name: NW Grund
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Bundesnetzagentur decision BK6-13-251
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/DE/Beschlusskammern/1_GZ/BK6-GZ/2013/BK6-13-251/BK6-13-251_Beschluss_2014_04_28.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1

research_summary:
Web searches did not surface an official offshore wind project explicitly named “NW Grund.” The nearest clearly documented offshore project is “Nördlicher Grund” in the German North Sea, but that is a different name and should not be silently substituted. BNetzA’s 28/04/2014 decision and Stiftung Offshore-Windenergie’s 2017 status factsheet both reference Nördlicher Grund, not NW Grund.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/DE/Beschlusskammern/1_GZ/BK6-GZ/2013/BK6-13-251/BK6-13-251_Beschluss_2014_04_28.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1


wind_farm_id: 6447
canonical_id: b6a974fc-045e-437c-8735-c2690ee05e71
wind_farm_name: NW Grund
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Bundesnetzagentur decision BK6-13-251
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/DE/Beschlusskammern/1_GZ/BK6-GZ/2013/BK6-13-251/BK6-13-251_Beschluss_2014_04_28.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1

research_summary:
For NW Grund, no authoritative current owner/developer page was found. The similarly named Nördlicher Grund is described by BNetzA as a planned project whose applicant is Nördlicher Grund GmbH; older legal/transaction material indicates historical involvement of Blackstone, but that evidence is for Nördlicher Grund and is not used to fill the NW Grund row. Freshest dated source relied on for the mismatch check: BNetzA decision dated 28/04/2014; supporting status list dated 31/12/2017 in the factsheet.


wind_farm_id: 6447
canonical_id: b6a974fc-045e-437c-8735-c2690ee05e71
wind_farm_name: NW Grund
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://augustaco.com/transaction/sale-of-320mw-german-offshore-wind-farm-nordlicher-grund/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Augusta & Co transaction note
source_of_record_url: https://augustaco.com/transaction/sale-of-320mw-german-offshore-wind-farm-nordlicher-grund/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No ownership history could be confirmed for a project explicitly named NW Grund. Historical transaction references found online concern Nördlicher Grund only, including Blackstone-related acquisition coverage from 2011; because of the name mismatch, these are not treated as confirmed ownership history for NW Grund. Freshest dated source relied on for the mismatch check remains the BNetzA decision of 28/04/2014.


wind_farm_id: 6447
canonical_id: b6a974fc-045e-437c-8735-c2690ee05e71
wind_farm_name: NW Grund
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Concept
resolved_value: Concept
research_value: Concept
resolved_fact_id: 42274.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Stiftung Offshore-Windenergie factsheet 2017
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://offshore-stiftung.de/sites/offshorelink.de/files/documents/Factsheet_Status_Offshore-Windenergieausbau_2017_0.pdf

research_summary:
The provided database row says Concept. Web evidence does not confirm a live standalone project named NW Grund. Because the only substantive web evidence points to a differently named project (Nördlicher Grund), the closest safe Boundary Layer status for NW Grund is Concept, with an explicit identity-mismatch caveat rather than merging records.

source_of_record_url:
https://offshore-stiftung.de/sites/offshorelink.de/files/documents/Factsheet_Status_Offshore-Windenergieausbau_2017_0.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6447
canonical_id: b6a974fc-045e-437c-8735-c2690ee05e71
wind_farm_name: NW Grund
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 7462.0
resolved_source_type: emodnet
resolved_source_name: EMODnet Human Activities
resolved_source_detail: EMODnet Jan 2026
citation_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMODnet Human Activities
source_of_record_type: public data portal
source_of_record_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
source_of_record_licence: Free and open public portal
research_source_name: Bundesnetzagentur decision BK6-13-251
research_source_type: regulator
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific web source was found for NW Grund. A different project, Nördlicher Grund, is described in BNetzA’s 2014 decision as planned at 384 MW, but that value is not assigned here due to the identity mismatch.


wind_farm_id: 6447
canonical_id: b6a974fc-045e-437c-8735-c2690ee05e71
wind_farm_name: NW Grund
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Bundesnetzagentur decision BK6-13-251
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible authoritative source was found stating MEC for a project explicitly named NW Grund. For the differently named Nördlicher Grund, BNetzA discusses a grid connection allocation of 384 MW, but that is not used here as confirmed MEC for NW Grund.


wind_farm_id: 6447
canonical_id: b6a974fc-045e-437c-8735-c2690ee05e71
wind_farm_name: NW Grund
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Bundesnetzagentur decision BK6-13-251
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided for this row, and no project-specific web source was found for NW Grund. Although Nördlicher Grund is described as using 64 turbines in the 2014 BNetzA decision, no project-specific turbine model for NW Grund was confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6447
canonical_id: b6a974fc-045e-437c-8735-c2690ee05e71
wind_farm_name: NW Grund
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific OEM evidence was found for NW Grund. No linked EuroWindWakes fallback exists for this row, so the field remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6447
canonical_id: b6a974fc-045e-437c-8735-c2690ee05e71
wind_farm_name: NW Grund
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Bundesnetzagentur decision BK6-13-251
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific source was found for NW Grund. The 2014 BNetzA decision states Nördlicher Grund was planned with 64 wind turbines of 6 MW each, but that does not confirm a value for NW Grund.


wind_farm_id: 6447
canonical_id: b6a974fc-045e-437c-8735-c2690ee05e71
wind_farm_name: NW Grund
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific rotor diameter was found for NW Grund, and there is no linked EuroWindWakes fallback.


wind_farm_id: 6447
canonical_id: b6a974fc-045e-437c-8735-c2690ee05e71
wind_farm_name: NW Grund
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific hub height was found for NW Grund, and no EuroWindWakes linked turbine row was provided to use as fallback.


wind_farm_id: 6447
canonical_id: b6a974fc-045e-437c-8735-c2690ee05e71
wind_farm_name: NW Grund
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 8600.0
resolved_source_type: emodnet
resolved_source_name: EMODnet Human Activities
resolved_source_detail: EMODnet Jan 2026
citation_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMODnet Human Activities
source_of_record_type: public data portal
source_of_record_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
source_of_record_licence: Free and open public portal
research_source_name: Bundesnetzagentur decision BK6-13-251
research_source_type: regulator
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
No web source was found for a project explicitly named NW Grund. The differently named Nördlicher Grund is described by BNetzA as planned with 64 wind turbines, but that is not used to populate NW Grund. This therefore differs from the non-web validation signal of 0 only because the web evidence appears to belong to a different project identity, not because NW Grund itself is confirmed at another count.


wind_farm_id: 6447
canonical_id: b6a974fc-045e-437c-8735-c2690ee05e71
wind_farm_name: NW Grund
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Bundesnetzagentur decision BK6-13-251
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No consent document for NW Grund was found. For Nördlicher Grund, BNetzA states BSH approved the wind farm on 12/07/2005, later amended in 2007 and 2011, but that evidence is not applied to NW Grund because of the identity mismatch.


wind_farm_id: 6447
canonical_id: b6a974fc-045e-437c-8735-c2690ee05e71
wind_farm_name: NW Grund
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Stiftung Offshore-Windenergie presentation
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://offshore-stiftung.de/sites/offshorelink.de/files/documents/2014-06-18_Vortrag_Andreas_Wagner_SOW_Keynote_NorthSeaGrid-WS__Bremen.pdf

research_summary:
No FID was found for NW Grund. Available web evidence for the similarly named Nördlicher Grund indicates a planned/approved project and historical transaction activity, but no clear project FID confirmation for NW Grund.

source_of_record_url:
https://offshore-stiftung.de/sites/offshorelink.de/files/documents/2014-06-18_Vortrag_Andreas_Wagner_SOW_Keynote_NorthSeaGrid-WS__Bremen.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6447
canonical_id: b6a974fc-045e-437c-8735-c2690ee05e71
wind_farm_name: NW Grund
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Stiftung Offshore-Windenergie factsheet 2017
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://offshore-stiftung.de/sites/offshorelink.de/files/documents/Factsheet_Status_Offshore-Windenergieausbau_2017_0.pdf

research_summary:
No first power evidence was found for NW Grund. The similarly named Nördlicher Grund appears not to have been built in the sources reviewed, but that still does not confirm a first-power status for NW Grund.


wind_farm_id: 6449
canonical_id: 6395041a-816f-42ae-a122-0e443cb5e4ed
wind_farm_name: Trem Mkllebugt
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Trem Mkllebugt
research_value: Trem Mkllebugt
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Planning Inspectorate appendix PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010130-002051-6.3.5.2%20Offshore%20Cumulative%20Effects%20Assessment%20Methodology.pdf

research_summary:
Exact-name web research did not find an official project page, owner page, regulator filing, or supplier reference for Trem Mkllebugt. The only visible exact-name evidence is a secondary project list embedded in a UK Planning Inspectorate cumulative-effects appendix, where Trem Mkllebugt appears as an offshore wind farm in Concept/Early Planning. That is insufficient to prove an official identity, so I have kept the exact dataset name and treated this as an identity-mismatch / unsupported-project case.

source_of_record_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010130-002051-6.3.5.2%20Offshore%20Cumulative%20Effects%20Assessment%20Methodology.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6449
canonical_id: 6395041a-816f-42ae-a122-0e443cb5e4ed
wind_farm_name: Trem Mkllebugt
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/denmarks-largest-tendering-procedure-offshore-wind-power-launched
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA 24/04/2024 tender launch
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/denmarks-largest-tendering-procedure-offshore-wind-power-launched
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No authoritative source found for developer, owner, equity split, or operator for the exact target name. Freshest official negative cross-check reviewed: Danish Energy Agency pages published 24/04/2024 and later-updated general offshore-wind guidance still do not identify Trem Mkllebugt.


wind_farm_id: 6449
canonical_id: 6395041a-816f-42ae-a122-0e443cb5e4ed
wind_farm_name: Trem Mkllebugt
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/offshore-wind-power/denmarks-energy-islands
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA Energy Islands overview
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/offshore-wind-power/denmarks-energy-islands
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No authoritative ownership-history trail was found for the exact target name. The available exact-name hit is only a secondary list entry, insufficient to establish historical ownership changes. Freshest official source date relied on for the negative cross-check: DEA material published 24/04/2024 still does not identify this exact project.


wind_farm_id: 6449
canonical_id: 6395041a-816f-42ae-a122-0e443cb5e4ed
wind_farm_name: Trem Mkllebugt
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Concept
resolved_value: Concept
research_value: Concept
resolved_fact_id: 42275.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Planning Inspectorate appendix PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010130-002051-6.3.5.2%20Offshore%20Cumulative%20Effects%20Assessment%20Methodology.pdf

research_summary:
The only exact-name web support is the Planning Inspectorate cumulative-effects appendix, which labels Trem Mkllebugt as Offshore Wind Farm and Concept/Early Planning. No regulator or developer source for the exact name was found, so Concept is the closest Boundary Layer status and should be treated as weakly evidenced.


wind_farm_id: 6449
canonical_id: 6395041a-816f-42ae-a122-0e443cb5e4ed
wind_farm_name: Trem Mkllebugt
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 720
resolved_value: 720
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 7464.0
resolved_source_type: emodnet
resolved_source_name: EMODnet Human Activities
resolved_source_detail: EMODnet Jan 2026
citation_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMODnet Human Activities
source_of_record_type: public data portal
source_of_record_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
source_of_record_licence: Free and open public portal
research_source_name: DEA offshore procedures
research_source_type: government webpage
research_source_url: https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/offshore-procedures-permits
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
The database context says 720 MW, but I did not find an authoritative web source for the exact target name confirming capacity. The secondary cumulative-assessment reference is not strong enough to adopt the 720 MW figure into the profile.


wind_farm_id: 6449
canonical_id: 6395041a-816f-42ae-a122-0e443cb5e4ed
wind_farm_name: Trem Mkllebugt
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/offshore-wind-power/denmarks-energy-islands
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA Energy Islands overview
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/offshore-wind-power/denmarks-energy-islands
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No exact-name authoritative web source found. No grid, permit, or transmission document located for Trem Mkllebugt.


wind_farm_id: 6449
canonical_id: 6395041a-816f-42ae-a122-0e443cb5e4ed
wind_farm_name: Trem Mkllebugt
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/offshore-procedures-permits
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA offshore procedures
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/offshore-procedures-permits
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided, and no project-specific web source for the exact name was found. Per instruction, turbine fields remain Not confirmed and are not inferred from any similar project.


wind_farm_id: 6449
canonical_id: 6395041a-816f-42ae-a122-0e443cb5e4ed
wind_farm_name: Trem Mkllebugt
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/offshore-procedures-permits
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA offshore procedures
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/offshore-procedures-permits
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No exact-name authoritative source found; no linked turbine fallback row available. Hub height has not been inferred.


wind_farm_id: 6449
canonical_id: 6395041a-816f-42ae-a122-0e443cb5e4ed
wind_farm_name: Trem Mkllebugt
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 8602.0
resolved_source_type: emodnet
resolved_source_name: EMODnet Human Activities
resolved_source_detail: EMODnet Jan 2026
citation_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMODnet Human Activities
source_of_record_type: public data portal
source_of_record_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
source_of_record_licence: Free and open public portal
research_source_name: DEA offshore procedures
research_source_type: government webpage
research_source_url: https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/offshore-procedures-permits
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
No web source found for turbine count for the exact target name. This does not align with the non-web validation signal of 0 turbines from EMODnet; the most likely reason is that the row is an early-stage or placeholder concept with no project-specific web documentation traceable under the exact name.


wind_farm_id: 6450
canonical_id: 32a14b8d-49b8-4749-83ee-1dd64e70014b
wind_farm_name: Lillebælt-Syd (Lillegrund)
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://lillebaeltsyd.dk/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Lillebælt Syd project website
source_of_record_url: https://lillebaeltsyd.dk/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Lillebælt Syd Vindmøllepark; alternative / historic names: Lillebælt-Syd (Lillegrund), Lillebælt Syd, Lillebælt South / Little Belt South

research_value:
Lillebælt Syd Vindmøllepark; alternative / historic names: Lillebælt-Syd (Lillegrund), Lillebælt Syd, Lillebælt South / Little Belt South

research_summary:
The exact target identity appears in current secondary listings as “Lillebælt-Syd (Lillegrund)”, while official project and regulator pages use “Lillebælt Syd Vindmøllepark” / “Lillebælt Syd”. These appear to refer to the same project off Als/Helnæs, so no phase/name split was found.


wind_farm_id: 6450
canonical_id: 32a14b8d-49b8-4749-83ee-1dd64e70014b
wind_farm_name: Lillebælt-Syd (Lillegrund)
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 42276.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: European Energy Denmark news release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer / project company: Lillebælt Vind A/S. Current owners: TotalEnergies 72.25%, SONFOR 15.00%, European Energy 12.75%. Operator: Lillebælt Vind A/S

resolved_value:
Developer / project company: Lillebælt Vind A/S. Current owners: TotalEnergies 72.25%, SONFOR 15.00%, European Energy 12.75%. Operator: Lillebælt Vind A/S

citation_url:
https://dk.europeanenergy.com/2025/07/30/geotekniske-undersoegelser-igangsaettes-for-havvindprojektet-lillebaelt-syd/

research_summary:
Freshest ownership evidence relied on is dated 30/07/2025 from European Energy, which lists the three owners and percentages. The project site’s owners page confirms the project started under Sønderborg Forsyning/SONFOR, European Energy joined in 2022, and TotalEnergies became majority owner in 2024. The regulator permit confirms Lillebælt Vind A/S as project company / permit holder.

source_of_record_url:
https://dk.europeanenergy.com/2025/07/30/geotekniske-undersoegelser-igangsaettes-for-havvindprojektet-lillebaelt-syd/


wind_farm_id: 6450
canonical_id: 32a14b8d-49b8-4749-83ee-1dd64e70014b
wind_farm_name: Lillebælt-Syd (Lillegrund)
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://lillebaeltsyd.dk/ejerne/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Lillebælt Syd owners page
source_of_record_url: https://lillebaeltsyd.dk/ejerne/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Originally Sønderborg Forsyning / SONFOR only; European Energy joined in 2022; TotalEnergies acquired majority in 2024; current split 72.25% / 15.00% / 12.75%

research_value:
Originally Sønderborg Forsyning / SONFOR only; European Energy joined in 2022; TotalEnergies acquired majority in 2024; current split 72.25% / 15.00% / 12.75%

research_summary:
Freshest dated source used is 30/07/2025. Ownership history is explicit on the owners page: SONFOR started as sole owner, European Energy became co-owner in 2022, and TotalEnergies bought the majority in 2024. Current percentages are confirmed by European Energy’s 2025 project updates.


wind_farm_id: 6450
canonical_id: 32a14b8d-49b8-4749-83ee-1dd64e70014b
wind_farm_name: Lillebælt-Syd (Lillegrund)
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Consented
resolved_value: Consented
research_value: Consented
resolved_fact_id: 42277.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-giver-tilladelse-til-etablere-lillebaelt-syd-vindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-giver-tilladelse-til-etablere-lillebaelt-syd-vindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project has an establishment permit from 28/11/2024 and the appeals board upheld that permit on 23/05/2025. Multiple 2025 sources say surveys are ongoing and construction is expected from 2027, so the closest Boundary Layer label is Consented rather than FID-taken or under construction.


wind_farm_id: 6450
canonical_id: 32a14b8d-49b8-4749-83ee-1dd64e70014b
wind_farm_name: Lillebælt-Syd (Lillegrund)
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 165 MW
resolved_value: 165 MW
research_value: 165 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42278.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-giver-tilladelse-til-etablere-lillebaelt-syd-vindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-giver-tilladelse-til-etablere-lillebaelt-syd-vindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official project and regulator sources consistently state 11 turbines at 15 MW each for a total of 165 MW. This differs from the fallback EMODnet context value of 160 MW and likely reflects an older pre-optimization concept.


wind_farm_id: 6450
canonical_id: 32a14b8d-49b8-4749-83ee-1dd64e70014b
wind_farm_name: Lillebælt-Syd (Lillegrund)
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://mst.dk/media/vfldboog/udkast-til-25-tilladelse-lillebaelt-syd-f2382080521378747706.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Miljøstyrelsen land permit draft
source_of_record_url: https://mst.dk/media/vfldboog/udkast-til-25-tilladelse-lillebaelt-syd-f2382080521378747706.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible source located an explicit named MEC/export-capacity value in MW. The land-permit documents confirm export via two 66 kV subsea cables and step-up to 150 kV onshore, but do not clearly state a distinct MEC figure.


wind_farm_id: 6450
canonical_id: 32a14b8d-49b8-4749-83ee-1dd64e70014b
wind_farm_name: Lillebælt-Syd (Lillegrund)
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://lillebaeltsyd.dk/om/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Lillebælt Syd project facts page
source_of_record_url: https://lillebaeltsyd.dk/om/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources confirm only that the project will use 15 MW turbines with 256 m total height and 236 m rotor diameter. No accessible authoritative source explicitly names the turbine model for this project, so per instruction it remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6450
canonical_id: 32a14b8d-49b8-4749-83ee-1dd64e70014b
wind_farm_name: Lillebælt-Syd (Lillegrund)
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://lillebaeltsyd.dk/om/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Lillebælt Syd project facts page
source_of_record_url: https://lillebaeltsyd.dk/om/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible project-specific source explicitly identifies the OEM. Generic inference from 15 MW / 236 m turbines would be speculative and is avoided.


wind_farm_id: 6450
canonical_id: 32a14b8d-49b8-4749-83ee-1dd64e70014b
wind_farm_name: Lillebælt-Syd (Lillegrund)
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: January 2025 Lillebælt Syd presentation
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific sources confirm total height 256 m and rotor diameter 236 m, but do not explicitly state hub height/nav height for the as-consented project. No linked EuroWindWakes fallback was provided, so this remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6450
canonical_id: 32a14b8d-49b8-4749-83ee-1dd64e70014b
wind_farm_name: Lillebælt-Syd (Lillegrund)
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 11
resolved_value: 11
research_value: 11
resolved_fact_id: 42281.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-giver-tilladelse-til-etablere-lillebaelt-syd-vindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-giver-tilladelse-til-etablere-lillebaelt-syd-vindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current web sources consistently show 11 turbines. This differs from the non-web validation signal of 0 turbines in EMODnet, which is best interpreted as an outdated/placeholder dataset value for a consented-but-unbuilt project rather than a live project count.


wind_farm_id: 6450
canonical_id: 32a14b8d-49b8-4749-83ee-1dd64e70014b
wind_farm_name: Lillebælt-Syd (Lillegrund)
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile
resolved_value: Monopile
research_value: Monopile
resolved_fact_id: 42282.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: January 2025 Lillebælt Syd presentation
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The regulator press release states the project comprises 11 offshore wind turbines on monopiles, and the January 2025 project presentation specifies monopile foundations.


wind_farm_id: 6450
canonical_id: 32a14b8d-49b8-4749-83ee-1dd64e70014b
wind_farm_name: Lillebælt-Syd (Lillegrund)
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://lillebaeltsyd.dk/etablering/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Lillebælt Syd establishment page
source_of_record_url: https://lillebaeltsyd.dk/etablering/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official 2024-2025 sources discuss maturation, supplier selection and work needed before an eventual final investment decision, but no authoritative source found a dated FID having been taken.


wind_farm_id: 6450
canonical_id: 32a14b8d-49b8-4749-83ee-1dd64e70014b
wind_farm_name: Lillebælt-Syd (Lillegrund)
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
research_summary: No source found a first-power milestone; only expected operation/commissioning year 2029 is stated.
source_of_record_name: European Energy project update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://europeanenergy.com/2025/04/10/seabed-surveys-underway-at-lillebaelt-syd-offshore-wind-project/

source_of_record_url:
https://europeanenergy.com/2025/04/10/seabed-surveys-underway-at-lillebaelt-syd-offshore-wind-project/


wind_farm_id: 6450
canonical_id: 32a14b8d-49b8-4749-83ee-1dd64e70014b
wind_farm_name: Lillebælt-Syd (Lillegrund)
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/01/2029
resolved_value: 01/01/2029
research_value: 01/01/2029
resolved_fact_id: 42284.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: European Energy project update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://europeanenergy.com/2025/04/10/seabed-surveys-underway-at-lillebaelt-syd-offshore-wind-project/

research_summary:
Sources state expected commissioning / operation in 2029 but not a precise day or month, so this is normalized to 01/01/2029 per instructions.


wind_farm_id: 6453
canonical_id: acddb873-7811-4f61-993c-aff89e5d681c
wind_farm_name: Jammerland Bugt
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://dk.europeanenergy.com/hvad-laver-vi/havvind/jammerland-bugt-havvindmoellepark/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: European Energy project page
source_of_record_url: https://dk.europeanenergy.com/hvad-laver-vi/havvind/jammerland-bugt-havvindmoellepark/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Jammerland Bugt Kystnær Havmøllepark (English: Jammerland Bay offshore wind farm); historic/alternate naming includes Jammerland Bugt Havmøllepark

research_value:
Jammerland Bugt Kystnær Havmøllepark (English: Jammerland Bay offshore wind farm); historic/alternate naming includes Jammerland Bugt Havmøllepark

research_summary:
The official developer page uses Jammerland Bugt Kystnær Havmøllepark. Danish Energy Agency and TotalEnergies also refer to the same project as Jammerland Bugt / Jammerland Bay. The naming variation is bilingual/branding, not a different phase.


wind_farm_id: 6453
canonical_id: acddb873-7811-4f61-993c-aff89e5d681c
wind_farm_name: Jammerland Bugt
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 42301.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/6143/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency establishment permit
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/6143/download
source_of_record_licence: public PDF
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: European Energy via Jammerland Bay Nearshore A/S. Current owners: TotalEnergies 85%, European Energy 15%. Operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: European Energy via Jammerland Bay Nearshore A/S. Current owners: TotalEnergies 85%, European Energy 15%. Operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
Freshest ownership evidence used is the 17/12/2024 Danish Energy Agency establishment permit, which states the project will be owned by TotalEnergies Renewables Jammerland ApS (85%) and EE HoldCo (15%). This is consistent with TotalEnergies’ 23/01/2024 press release and its 2025 project update stating TotalEnergies (85%) and European Energy (15%). No separate operating entity was clearly confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6453
canonical_id: acddb873-7811-4f61-993c-aff89e5d681c
wind_farm_name: Jammerland Bugt
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: TotalEnergies press release
source_of_record_licence: public PDF
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Originally developed by European Energy; TotalEnergies agreed to acquire 85% in 01/2024; current split 85% TotalEnergies / 15% European Energy

research_value:
Originally developed by European Energy; TotalEnergies agreed to acquire 85% in 01/2024; current split 85% TotalEnergies / 15% European Energy

citation_url:
https://totalenergies.com/system/files/documents/2024-01/ENG_Renewables_TotalEnergies_and_European_Energy_Expand_their_Collaboration_to_Offshore_Wind.pdf

research_summary:
Freshest ownership-structure source relied on is the 17/12/2024 DEA permit. Earlier project materials and DEA pages identify European Energy / Jammerland Bay Nearshore A/S as developer. TotalEnergies announced the 85% acquisition agreement on 23/01/2024, and the later permit reflects that ownership structure for the project company.

source_of_record_url:
https://totalenergies.com/system/files/documents/2024-01/ENG_Renewables_TotalEnergies_and_European_Energy_Expand_their_Collaboration_to_Offshore_Wind.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6453
canonical_id: acddb873-7811-4f61-993c-aff89e5d681c
wind_farm_name: Jammerland Bugt
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Consented
resolved_value: Consented
research_value: Consented
resolved_fact_id: 42302.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-giver-tilladelse-til-etablere-jammerland-bugt-kystnaer-havmoellepark

research_summary:
The project received its construction / establishment permit on 17/12/2024. Subsequent 2025 owner updates describe seabed and geotechnical surveys ahead of construction, with construction expected from 2027 and production/commissioning in 2029. That fits the Boundary Layer label Consented rather than FID-taken.

source_of_record_url:
https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-giver-tilladelse-til-etablere-jammerland-bugt-kystnaer-havmoellepark


wind_farm_id: 6453
canonical_id: acddb873-7811-4f61-993c-aff89e5d681c
wind_farm_name: Jammerland Bugt
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 240 MW
resolved_value: 240 MW
research_value: 240 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42303.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/6143/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency establishment permit
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/6143/download
source_of_record_licence: public PDF
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The selected project configuration in the establishment-permit process is 16 turbines x 15 MW = 240 MW. This matches the owner and developer pages.


wind_farm_id: 6453
canonical_id: acddb873-7811-4f61-993c-aff89e5d681c
wind_farm_name: Jammerland Bugt
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 240 MW
resolved_value: 240 MW
research_value: 240 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42304.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/2383/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Project description PDF
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/2383/download
source_of_record_licence: public PDF
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
A project description states export capacity “op til 240 MW ved nettilslutningspunktet”, indicating MEC aligns with planned installed capacity. DEA/European Energy also state grid connection at Asnæsværket.


wind_farm_id: 6453
canonical_id: acddb873-7811-4f61-993c-aff89e5d681c
wind_farm_name: Jammerland Bugt
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/2358/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: European Energy application
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/2358/download
source_of_record_licence: public PDF
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific sources confirm only the selected site-specific envelope: 15 MW, 236 m rotor diameter, 256 m total height. None of the reviewed accessible official/regulatory sources explicitly names an OEM model, so the model is kept Not confirmed rather than inferred.


wind_farm_id: 6453
canonical_id: acddb873-7811-4f61-993c-aff89e5d681c
wind_farm_name: Jammerland Bugt
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/2358/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: European Energy application
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/2358/download
source_of_record_licence: public PDF
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific official or regulatory source reviewed explicitly names the OEM for Jammerland Bugt. Per the no-inference rule, OEM is left unconfirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6453
canonical_id: acddb873-7811-4f61-993c-aff89e5d681c
wind_farm_name: Jammerland Bugt
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 15 MW
resolved_value: 15 MW
research_value: 15 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42305.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/6143/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency establishment permit
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/6143/download
source_of_record_licence: public PDF
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The 15/03/2024 application and 17/12/2024 establishment permit both specify 16 turbines of 15 MW each.


wind_farm_id: 6453
canonical_id: acddb873-7811-4f61-993c-aff89e5d681c
wind_farm_name: Jammerland Bugt
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 236 m
resolved_value: 236 m
research_value: 236 m
resolved_fact_id: 42306.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/6143/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency establishment permit
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/6143/download
source_of_record_licence: public PDF
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project-specific application and establishment permit both specify a 236 m rotor diameter for the selected layout.


wind_farm_id: 6453
canonical_id: acddb873-7811-4f61-993c-aff89e5d681c
wind_farm_name: Jammerland Bugt
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/2358/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: European Energy application
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/2358/download
source_of_record_licence: public PDF
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific sources reviewed provide total height 256 m and rotor diameter 236 m, plus 20 m clearance from HAT to blade tip, but do not explicitly state hub height. Because no linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided for this project, hub height remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6453
canonical_id: acddb873-7811-4f61-993c-aff89e5d681c
wind_farm_name: Jammerland Bugt
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 16
resolved_value: 16
research_value: 16
resolved_fact_id: 42307.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-giver-tilladelse-til-etablere-jammerland-bugt-kystnaer-havmoellepark

research_summary:
Current project-specific sources consistently support 16 turbines for the permitted project. This differs from the EMODnet validation hint of 0, which is likely an outdated or non-populated dataset value rather than a live project figure. It also narrows earlier older project ranges such as 16–21 or wider scoping options to the final consented layout.


wind_farm_id: 6453
canonical_id: acddb873-7811-4f61-993c-aff89e5d681c
wind_farm_name: Jammerland Bugt
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile
resolved_value: Monopile
research_value: Monopile
resolved_fact_id: 42308.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project-specific permit and application explicitly state the offshore wind turbines will be installed on monopiles / monopæle.


wind_farm_id: 6453
canonical_id: acddb873-7811-4f61-993c-aff89e5d681c
wind_farm_name: Jammerland Bugt
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 17/12/2024
resolved_value: 17/12/2024
research_value: 17/12/2024
resolved_fact_id: 42309.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/6143/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency establishment permit
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/6143/download
source_of_record_licence: public PDF
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The establishment / construction permit was granted on 17 December 2024. This is the clearest consent milestone for Boundary Layer purposes.


wind_farm_id: 6453
canonical_id: acddb873-7811-4f61-993c-aff89e5d681c
wind_farm_name: Jammerland Bugt
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: TotalEnergies March 2025 update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://corporate.totalenergies.dk/news/havbundsundersogelser-i-gang-naeste-skridt-mod-jammerland-bugt-havvindpark

research_summary:
No accessible official/regulatory/owner source reviewed explicitly states that FID has been taken for Jammerland Bugt. Sources describe the project as permitted and undergoing surveys, with construction expected from 2027.

source_of_record_url:
https://corporate.totalenergies.dk/news/havbundsundersogelser-i-gang-naeste-skridt-mod-jammerland-bugt-havvindpark


wind_farm_id: 6453
canonical_id: acddb873-7811-4f61-993c-aff89e5d681c
wind_farm_name: Jammerland Bugt
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: TotalEnergies March 2025 update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://corporate.totalenergies.dk/news/havbundsundersogelser-i-gang-naeste-skridt-mod-jammerland-bugt-havvindpark

research_summary:
No source reviewed gives a first-power milestone. Sources only provide expected production / commissioning in 2029 at year level.


wind_farm_id: 6453
canonical_id: acddb873-7811-4f61-993c-aff89e5d681c
wind_farm_name: Jammerland Bugt
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/01/2029
resolved_value: 01/01/2029
research_value: 01/01/2029
resolved_fact_id: 42310.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: TotalEnergies March 2025 update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Multiple current owner/developer pages say the wind farm is expected to be operational / completed / commissioned in 2029. As only year-level confirmation was found, the table normalizes this to 01/01/2029.


wind_farm_id: 6462
canonical_id: f89c3356-d2ef-4db3-82ee-845b32305feb
wind_farm_name: Nobelwind
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Nobelwind; also referred to as Belwind phase 2 / Bligh Bank Phase II
research_value: Nobelwind; also referred to as Belwind phase 2 / Bligh Bank Phase II
citation_url: https://parkwind.eu/projects/nobelwind
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Parkwind Nobelwind project page
source_of_record_url: https://parkwind.eu/projects/nobelwind
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Phase/name ambiguity resolves to Nobelwind, Parkwind’s third Belgian offshore wind project. Parkwind’s live project page uses Nobelwind; Belgian Offshore Platform describes the same 165 MW, 50-turbine project. Historic alternate names including Belwind phase 2 / Bligh Bank Phase II appear in secondary summaries and legacy project references.


wind_farm_id: 6462
canonical_id: f89c3356-d2ef-4db3-82ee-845b32305feb
wind_farm_name: Nobelwind
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.sumitomocorp.com/en/jp/news/release/2015/group/20151023
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Sumitomo Nobelwind financing/start of construction release
source_of_record_url: https://www.sumitomocorp.com/en/jp/news/release/2015/group/20151023
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developed by Nobelwind NV with Parkwind, Sumitomo and Meewind; Sumitomo acquired 39.02% in 06/2014; financing and construction start announced 23/10/2015; no accessible newer source found showing a later Nobelwind equity transfer

research_value:
Developed by Nobelwind NV with Parkwind, Sumitomo and Meewind; Sumitomo acquired 39.02% in 06/2014; financing and construction start announced 23/10/2015; no accessible newer source found showing a later Nobelwind equity transfer

research_summary:
Ownership history is clearer than current-share refresh. Sumitomo states it joined in 06/2014 with 39.02%. Meewind’s materials also describe the three-party structure at roughly 41/39/20. I found no open, newer, project-specific source showing a subsequent Nobelwind ownership reshuffle, unlike Northwind where Parkwind explicitly published a 2024 ownership update. Freshest source date relied on for “no newer transfer found” context: Parkwind live Nobelwind project page crawled 2026, but undated; dated ownership percentages remain from 2015-era official/partner sources.


wind_farm_id: 6462
canonical_id: f89c3356-d2ef-4db3-82ee-845b32305feb
wind_farm_name: Nobelwind
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://parkwind.eu/projects/nobelwind
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Parkwind Nobelwind project page
source_of_record_url: https://parkwind.eu/projects/nobelwind
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Accessible sources consistently confirm installed capacity 165 MW, but I did not find an open official grid/regulatory source explicitly stating a contracted MEC value for Nobelwind. Shared export infrastructure with Northwind is described, so gross installed capacity should not be assumed to equal a separately contracted MEC without direct evidence.


wind_farm_id: 6462
canonical_id: f89c3356-d2ef-4db3-82ee-845b32305feb
wind_farm_name: Nobelwind
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: V112-3.3 MW Offshore
resolved_value: V112-3.3 MW Offshore
resolved_fact_id: 36032.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: unavailable
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.vestas.com/en/media/company-news/2015/mhi-vestas-offshore-wind-receives-165-mw-order-for-proj-c2963921


wind_farm_id: 6468
canonical_id: fc02083e-c511-4b16-8d1e-7f21c2adf689
wind_farm_name: Borssele Kavel V
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2
resolved_value: 2
resolved_fact_id: 47070.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: unavailable
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
resolved_source_detail:
Calculated from 2 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations (2 linked turbines also fall within another wind farm geometry)


wind_farm_id: 6475
canonical_id: 1f32e814-e8a1-4fe2-bafb-79d126d6e1b9
wind_farm_name: Courseulles-sur-mer
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.parc-eolien-en-mer-du-calvados.fr/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Parc éolien en mer du Calvados
source_of_record_url: https://www.parc-eolien-en-mer-du-calvados.fr/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Official name: Parc éolien en mer du Calvados; target identity / alternative name: Courseulles-sur-Mer offshore wind farm

research_value:
Official name: Parc éolien en mer du Calvados; target identity / alternative name: Courseulles-sur-Mer offshore wind farm

research_summary:
Current project website uses “Parc éolien en mer du Calvados / Calvados offshore wind farm” for the Courseulles-sur-Mer project area. Secondary owner/project pages explicitly link Calvados and Courseulles-sur-Mer as the same asset, so this is a naming variant rather than an identity mismatch.


wind_farm_id: 6475
canonical_id: 1f32e814-e8a1-4fe2-bafb-79d126d6e1b9
wind_farm_name: Courseulles-sur-mer
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 42593.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Acteurs du projet | Parc éolien en mer du Calvados
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: EDF power solutions, EIH S.à r.l. (Enbridge + CPP Investments), Skyborn Renewables; current owners: same consortium; operator / project company: Éoliennes Offshore du Calvados (EODC)

resolved_value:
Developer: EDF power solutions, EIH S.à r.l. (Enbridge + CPP Investments), Skyborn Renewables; current owners: same consortium; operator / project company: Éoliennes Offshore du Calvados (EODC)

citation_url:
https://www.parc-eolien-en-mer-du-calvados.fr/projet-du-parc-eolien-en-mer-calvados/acteurs-projet-parc-eolien-en-mer-calvados/

research_summary:
The project consortium page says the wind farm is held by EDF power solutions, EIH S.à r.l. and Skyborn Renewables. EODC is the dedicated project company/site publisher. Freshness note: the consortium page was crawled recently and Enbridge’s current project page says the project is under construction with Enbridge holding a stake; freshest dated owner evidence relied on is Enbridge investor material published 13/02/2026 confirming Courseulles/Calvados remains on schedule.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.parc-eolien-en-mer-du-calvados.fr/projet-du-parc-eolien-en-mer-calvados/acteurs-projet-parc-eolien-en-mer-calvados/


wind_farm_id: 6475
canonical_id: 1f32e814-e8a1-4fe2-bafb-79d126d6e1b9
wind_farm_name: Courseulles-sur-mer
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Acteurs du projet | Parc éolien en mer du Calvados
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Originally awarded in 2012 to consortium led by EDF; current consortium remains EDF power solutions + EIH S.à r.l. + Skyborn Renewables. Exact full current percentage split: Not confirmed. Confirmed partial stake: Enbridge 21.7%.

research_value:
Originally awarded in 2012 to consortium led by EDF; current consortium remains EDF power solutions + EIH S.à r.l. + Skyborn Renewables. Exact full current percentage split: Not confirmed. Confirmed partial stake: Enbridge 21.7%.

citation_url:
https://www.parc-eolien-en-mer-du-calvados.fr/projet-du-parc-eolien-en-mer-calvados/acteurs-projet-parc-eolien-en-mer-calvados/

research_summary:
Historic official/project material and 2021 consortium release name EDF Renewables, Enbridge and wpd; newer current pages replace wpd branding with Skyborn Renewables, consistent with corporate rebranding rather than a project identity change. The full ownership percentages are not openly reconciled on a current JV page; only Enbridge’s 21.7% is explicitly current from accessible current owner material, while the current consortium membership is confirmed on the project site. Freshest dated source relied on: Enbridge investor material published 13/02/2026; because percentages do not reconcile publicly across all partners, the full split is kept Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6475
canonical_id: 1f32e814-e8a1-4fe2-bafb-79d126d6e1b9
wind_farm_name: Courseulles-sur-mer
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Under Construction
resolved_value: Under Construction
research_value: Under Construction
resolved_fact_id: 42594.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Calvados project update 15/07/2025
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.parc-eolien-en-mer-du-calvados.fr/2025/07/15/quelles-sont-les-prochaines-etapes-du-chantier-du-parc-eolien-en-mer-du-calvados/

research_summary:
Newer project-specific construction update dated 15/07/2025 says offshore works continue through 2025 and 2026 with progressive commissioning only from H2 2027. That clearly supports Under Construction, overriding older pages that still mention earlier commissioning horizons.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.parc-eolien-en-mer-du-calvados.fr/2025/07/15/quelles-sont-les-prochaines-etapes-du-chantier-du-parc-eolien-en-mer-du-calvados/


wind_farm_id: 6475
canonical_id: 1f32e814-e8a1-4fe2-bafb-79d126d6e1b9
wind_farm_name: Courseulles-sur-mer
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 450 MW
resolved_value: 450 MW
research_value: 450 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42595.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.parc-eolien-en-mer-du-calvados.fr/english-presentation-calvados-offshore-wind-farm/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: English presentation – Calvados offshore wind farm
source_of_record_url: https://www.parc-eolien-en-mer-du-calvados.fr/english-presentation-calvados-offshore-wind-farm/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current official project page says 64 offshore wind turbines with a total capacity of 450 MW. Some older supplier/government pages still say 448 MW; that appears to be the contracted turbine sum, while current project-facing materials round/report the project as 450 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6475
canonical_id: 1f32e814-e8a1-4fe2-bafb-79d126d6e1b9
wind_farm_name: Courseulles-sur-mer
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.rte-france.com/projets/nos-projets/raccordement-du-parc-eolien-en-mer-du-calvados
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.rte-france.com/projets/nos-projets/raccordement-du-parc-eolien-en-mer-du-calvados
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Publicly accessible sources found confirm installed/planned capacity and the grid connection voltage, but do not clearly state a separate named MEC/export capacity figure for this exact project. To avoid conflating gross capacity with export capability, kept as Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6475
canonical_id: 1f32e814-e8a1-4fe2-bafb-79d126d6e1b9
wind_farm_name: Courseulles-sur-mer
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens Gamesa SWT-7.0-154 Direct Drive
resolved_value: Siemens Gamesa SWT-7.0-154 Direct Drive
research_value: Siemens Gamesa SWT-7.0-154 Direct Drive
resolved_fact_id: 42596.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/press-releases/210222-siemens-gamesa-press-release-Courseulles-firm-order.html

research_summary:
Project-specific supplier press release explicitly ties the model to Courseulles-sur-Mer. This is preferred over generic turbine pages or third-party databases.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/press-releases/210222-siemens-gamesa-press-release-Courseulles-firm-order.html


wind_farm_id: 6475
canonical_id: 1f32e814-e8a1-4fe2-bafb-79d126d6e1b9
wind_farm_name: Courseulles-sur-mer
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy
resolved_value: Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy
research_value: Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy
resolved_fact_id: 42597.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/press-releases/210222-siemens-gamesa-press-release-Courseulles-firm-order.html

research_summary:
Confirmed directly by Siemens Gamesa’s project-specific order announcement and by current owner project description.


wind_farm_id: 6475
canonical_id: 1f32e814-e8a1-4fe2-bafb-79d126d6e1b9
wind_farm_name: Courseulles-sur-mer
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 7 MW
resolved_value: 7 MW
research_value: 7 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42598.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Confirmed for this project by Siemens Gamesa’s Courseulles order release. The accessible OEM page gives the project-specific turbine model SWT-7.0-154, which supports 7 MW without relying on the dead Enbridge page.


wind_farm_id: 6475
canonical_id: 1f32e814-e8a1-4fe2-bafb-79d126d6e1b9
wind_farm_name: Courseulles-sur-mer
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 154 m
resolved_value: 154 m
research_value: 154 m
resolved_fact_id: 42599.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific confirmation comes from Siemens Gamesa’s named model SWT-7.0-154 for Courseulles-sur-Mer. A second project-specific source explicitly stating rotor diameter was not found in accessible authoritative pages; value accepted from the authoritative supplier’s project-specific order.


wind_farm_id: 6475
canonical_id: 1f32e814-e8a1-4fe2-bafb-79d126d6e1b9
wind_farm_name: Courseulles-sur-mer
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.parc-eolien-en-mer-du-calvados.fr/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Parc éolien en mer du Calvados
source_of_record_url: https://www.parc-eolien-en-mer-du-calvados.fr/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific accessible authoritative source found that explicitly states the as-built hub height for Courseulles/Calvados. Per instruction, this is kept Not confirmed and not inferred from the turbine platform.


wind_farm_id: 6475
canonical_id: 1f32e814-e8a1-4fe2-bafb-79d126d6e1b9
wind_farm_name: Courseulles-sur-mer
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 64
resolved_value: 64
research_value: 64
resolved_fact_id: 42600.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.parc-eolien-en-mer-du-calvados.fr/english-presentation-calvados-offshore-wind-farm/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: English presentation – Calvados offshore wind farm
source_of_record_url: https://www.parc-eolien-en-mer-du-calvados.fr/english-presentation-calvados-offshore-wind-farm/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current official project and RTE pages both state 64 turbines. This aligns with the non-web validation signal from EMODnet (64), so there is no current count conflict. Older pre-optimisation materials mentioning 75 turbines appear superseded by the current as-built plan.


wind_farm_id: 6475
canonical_id: 1f32e814-e8a1-4fe2-bafb-79d126d6e1b9
wind_farm_name: Courseulles-sur-mer
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile
resolved_value: Monopile
research_value: Monopile
resolved_fact_id: 42601.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Travaux en mer
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.parc-eolien-en-mer-du-calvados.fr/suivi-chantier-parc-eolien-en-mer-calvados/travaux-en-mer-parc-eolien-en-mer-calvados/

research_summary:
Current project construction page says the turbine foundations are fondations monopieux. This is corroborated by contractor/project references describing 64 monopiles for Calvados/Courseulles-sur-Mer.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.parc-eolien-en-mer-du-calvados.fr/suivi-chantier-parc-eolien-en-mer-calvados/travaux-en-mer-parc-eolien-en-mer-calvados/


wind_farm_id: 6475
canonical_id: 1f32e814-e8a1-4fe2-bafb-79d126d6e1b9
wind_farm_name: Courseulles-sur-mer
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 18/04/2012
resolved_value: 18/04/2012
research_value: 18/04/2012
resolved_fact_id: 42602.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Acteurs du projet | Parc éolien en mer du Calvados
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
An accessible current project consortium page states the offshore wind farm was awarded in April 2012. That supports retaining 18/04/2012 as the consent/award-style project date used in the existing report, while later 2016–2017 items on other pages relate to subsequent authorisations and works.


wind_farm_id: 6475
canonical_id: 1f32e814-e8a1-4fe2-bafb-79d126d6e1b9
wind_farm_name: Courseulles-sur-mer
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 23/02/2021
resolved_value: 23/02/2021
research_value: 23/02/2021
resolved_fact_id: 42603.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Consortium FID / construction press release
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.wpd.de/en/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/03/20210223_PR_EDF-Renewables-Enbridge-and-wpd-launch-construction-of-the-Calvados-offshore-wind-farm.pdf

research_summary:
Consortium press release published 23/02/2021 states they had reached a final investment decision and launched construction. Saipem’s 01/02/2021 release said its contract was still subject to a positive FID, so the later consortium release is the decisive confirmation.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.wpd.de/en/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/03/20210223_PR_EDF-Renewables-Enbridge-and-wpd-launch-construction-of-the-Calvados-offshore-wind-farm.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6475
canonical_id: 1f32e814-e8a1-4fe2-bafb-79d126d6e1b9
wind_farm_name: Courseulles-sur-mer
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/07/2027
resolved_value: 01/07/2027
research_value: 01/07/2027
resolved_fact_id: 42604.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Calvados project update 15/07/2025
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.parc-eolien-en-mer-du-calvados.fr/2025/07/15/quelles-sont-les-prochaines-etapes-du-chantier-du-parc-eolien-en-mer-du-calvados/

research_summary:
No first-power event has occurred yet. The latest dated project construction update says progressive commissioning from the second semester of 2027 after installation of the first turbines. Using the required normalization rule for half-year wording, this is recorded as 01/07/2027 and should be treated as a projected first-power window, not an achieved milestone.


wind_farm_id: 6475
canonical_id: 1f32e814-e8a1-4fe2-bafb-79d126d6e1b9
wind_farm_name: Courseulles-sur-mer
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/07/2027
resolved_value: 01/07/2027
research_value: 01/07/2027
resolved_fact_id: 42605.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Calvados project update 15/07/2025
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No achieved full commissioning date is available. The freshest project-specific construction update says mise en service progressive à partir du second semestre 2027; because the current accessible authoritative evidence supports a H2 2027 commissioning window rather than a generic year-only 2027 claim, the normalized projected full-commissioning date is updated to 01/07/2027.


wind_farm_id: 6476
canonical_id: c4898c2c-34c7-4988-b720-70638467ccec
wind_farm_name: Fécamp
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-fecamp.fr/le-parc-eolien-en-mer/acteurs-du-parc/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Parc éolien en mer de Fécamp - Acteurs du parc
source_of_record_url: https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-fecamp.fr/le-parc-eolien-en-mer/acteurs-du-parc/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Parc éolien en mer de Fécamp; project company: Eoliennes Offshore des Hautes Falaises (EOHF); alternative / historic name: Fécamp Offshore Wind Farm / Hautes Falaises

research_value:
Parc éolien en mer de Fécamp; project company: Eoliennes Offshore des Hautes Falaises (EOHF); alternative / historic name: Fécamp Offshore Wind Farm / Hautes Falaises

research_summary:
The exact target name matches the project-company identity EOHF used in project and supplier material, while the public-facing asset name is Parc éolien en mer de Fécamp / Fécamp Offshore Wind Farm.


wind_farm_id: 6476
canonical_id: c4898c2c-34c7-4988-b720-70638467ccec
wind_farm_name: Fécamp
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 42413.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-fecamp.fr/le-parc-eolien-en-mer/acteurs-du-parc/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Parc éolien en mer de Fécamp - Acteurs du parc
source_of_record_url: https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-fecamp.fr/le-parc-eolien-en-mer/acteurs-du-parc/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer consortium: EDF power solutions, EIH S.à r.l. (held 51% by Enbridge and 49% by CPP Investments), and Skyborn Renewables. Current owners not fully reconciled at project level from open current sources; confirmed participants are EDF power solutions, EIH S.à r.l., and Skyborn Renewables. Operator: EDF power solutions-led consortium

resolved_value:
Developer consortium: EDF power solutions, EIH S.à r.l. (held 51% by Enbridge and 49% by CPP Investments), and Skyborn Renewables. Current owners not fully reconciled at project level from open current sources; confirmed participants are EDF power solutions, EIH S.à r.l., and Skyborn Renewables. Operator: EDF power solutions-led consortium

research_summary:
Freshest project-specific source relied on is the project owners page crawled 12/05/2026, confirming EDF power solutions, EIH S.à r.l. and Skyborn Renewables. Freshest dated operating-phase source is EDF’s 15/05/2024 release. Open sources confirm the partner set, but I did not find a current open official page that reconciles a full project-level percentage split across all three present-day partners, so percentages are not asserted here.


wind_farm_id: 6476
canonical_id: c4898c2c-34c7-4988-b720-70638467ccec
wind_farm_name: Fécamp
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://enbridge.gcs-web.com/static-files/40890279-036a-4519-90cf-354cbae84036
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Enbridge annual filing
source_of_record_url: https://enbridge.gcs-web.com/static-files/40890279-036a-4519-90cf-354cbae84036
source_of_record_licence: public filing terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
01/04/2012 award to EDF-led consortium with Enbridge and wpd; by 01/01/2021 CPP Investments had acquired 49% of Enbridge’s holding vehicle for the French offshore portfolio; by 15/05/2024 open current sources describe owners as EDF power solutions, EIH S.à r.l. (Enbridge/CPP Investments), and Skyborn Renewables

research_value:
01/04/2012 award to EDF-led consortium with Enbridge and wpd; by 01/01/2021 CPP Investments had acquired 49% of Enbridge’s holding vehicle for the French offshore portfolio; by 15/05/2024 open current sources describe owners as EDF power solutions, EIH S.à r.l. (Enbridge/CPP Investments), and Skyborn Renewables

research_summary:
Historical consortium evidence is EDF Renewables + Enbridge + wpd at construction launch on 02/06/2020. Newer sources show the wpd/Skyborn branding change and CPP Investments inside EIH. Freshest dated ownership-change evidence relied on is Enbridge’s filing showing the 2021 sale of 49% of the entity holding Enbridge’s 50% EMF interest; freshest project-specific owner-set confirmation is the project owners page crawled 12/05/2026.


wind_farm_id: 6476
canonical_id: c4898c2c-34c7-4988-b720-70638467ccec
wind_farm_name: Fécamp
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 42414.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EDF power solutions commissioning release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://france.edf-powersolutions.com/en/communiques/parc-eolien-en-mer-de-fecamp-mise-en-service-du-premier-parc-eolien-en-mer-de-normandie/

research_summary:
EDF, Enbridge, CPP Investments and Skyborn all state the project was inaugurated / entered service in May 2024. RTE reporting also treats Fécamp as in service, with first MWh injected in July 2023 and operating status reflected in later grid reporting.

source_of_record_url:
https://france.edf-powersolutions.com/en/communiques/parc-eolien-en-mer-de-fecamp-mise-en-service-du-premier-parc-eolien-en-mer-de-normandie/


wind_farm_id: 6476
canonical_id: c4898c2c-34c7-4988-b720-70638467ccec
wind_farm_name: Fécamp
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 497 MW
resolved_value: 497 MW
research_value: 497 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42415.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.enbridge.com/projects-and-infrastructure/projects/fecamp-offshore-wind-project
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Enbridge Fécamp project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.enbridge.com/projects-and-infrastructure/projects/fecamp-offshore-wind-project
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current owner and commissioning sources consistently state 497 MW. Older RTE and contractor pages round this to 500 MW; 497 MW is preferred because it matches 71 × 7 MW and is used in current owner/commissioning material.


wind_farm_id: 6476
canonical_id: c4898c2c-34c7-4988-b720-70638467ccec
wind_farm_name: Fécamp
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 500 MW
resolved_value: 500 MW
research_value: 500 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42416.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE connection launch page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.rte-france.com/actualites/lancement-des-travaux-de-raccordement-du-parc-eolien-en-mer-de-fecamp

research_summary:
Open sources reviewed describe installed capacity and grid connection architecture, but I did not find a clearly labelled open-source MEC value. The closest corroborated grid/export figure is the rounded 500 MW project/grid figure used by RTE and contractors, so this is used as a proxy and should be treated cautiously.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.rte-france.com/actualites/lancement-des-travaux-de-raccordement-du-parc-eolien-en-mer-de-fecamp


wind_farm_id: 6476
canonical_id: c4898c2c-34c7-4988-b720-70638467ccec
wind_farm_name: Fécamp
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: SWT-7.0-154
resolved_value: SWT-7.0-154
research_value: SWT-7.0-154
resolved_fact_id: 42417.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources confirm Siemens Gamesa supplied 71 turbines at 7 MW each, but I did not find an accessible official project page explicitly stating the model designation. Per the required rule, the linked EuroWindWakes dataset fallback is used for the exact model.


wind_farm_id: 6476
canonical_id: c4898c2c-34c7-4988-b720-70638467ccec
wind_farm_name: Fécamp
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens Gamesa
resolved_value: Siemens Gamesa
research_value: Siemens Gamesa
resolved_fact_id: 9040.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Project construction launch page
research_source_type: official project website
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Confirmed directly by project construction and owner pages. This aligns with the linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata.

research_source_url:
https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-fecamp.fr/lancement-de-la-construction-du-parc-eolien-en-mer-de-fecamp/


wind_farm_id: 6476
canonical_id: c4898c2c-34c7-4988-b720-70638467ccec
wind_farm_name: Fécamp
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 7
resolved_value: 7
research_value: 7 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9350.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EDF first turbine release
research_source_type: owner/developer press release
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Multiple project-specific sources state 71 turbines of 7 MW each. This also matches 497 MW total capacity.

research_source_url:
https://france.edf-powersolutions.com/en/communiques/parc-eolien-en-mer-de-fecamp-la-premiere-eolienne-en-mer-normande-est-posee-2/


wind_farm_id: 6476
canonical_id: c4898c2c-34c7-4988-b720-70638467ccec
wind_farm_name: Fécamp
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 154
resolved_value: 154
research_value: 154 m
resolved_fact_id: 9505.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
I did not find an accessible authoritative project page explicitly giving rotor diameter for Fécamp. Per the required rule, the linked EuroWindWakes dataset fallback is used.


wind_farm_id: 6476
canonical_id: c4898c2c-34c7-4988-b720-70638467ccec
wind_farm_name: Fécamp
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 100
resolved_value: 100
research_value: 100 m
resolved_fact_id: 9660.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
No accessible project-specific web source found that explicitly states Fécamp hub height. Per the required rule, the linked EuroWindWakes fallback value of 100 m is used and is not inferred from generic turbine-platform material.


wind_farm_id: 6476
canonical_id: c4898c2c-34c7-4988-b720-70638467ccec
wind_farm_name: Fécamp
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 71
resolved_value: 71
research_value: 71
resolved_fact_id: 48133.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 71 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EDF commissioning release
research_source_type: owner/developer press release
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Strongly confirmed by official and supplier sources. This aligns with all provided non-web validation signals: EMODnet hint 71 and EuroWindWakes linked-turbine count 71. No phase-scope discrepancy was found.

research_source_url:
https://france.edf-powersolutions.com/en/communiques/parc-eolien-en-mer-de-fecamp-mise-en-service-du-premier-parc-eolien-en-mer-de-normandie/


wind_farm_id: 6476
canonical_id: c4898c2c-34c7-4988-b720-70638467ccec
wind_farm_name: Fécamp
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EDF permits validation release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://france.edf-powersolutions.com/communiques/the-conseil-detat-approves-the-final-administrative-permits-for-the-fecamp-and-courseulles-sur-mer-offshore-wind-farm-projects/

research_summary:
I found evidence for public-debate and litigation milestones, including Conseil d’Etat validation in 2019, but not a clean openly accessible primary page clearly giving the original project consent date in the exact sense requested. To avoid guessing between tender award, decrees, public inquiry and final authorisations, this remains Not confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://france.edf-powersolutions.com/communiques/the-conseil-detat-approves-the-final-administrative-permits-for-the-fecamp-and-courseulles-sur-mer-offshore-wind-farm-projects/


wind_farm_id: 6476
canonical_id: c4898c2c-34c7-4988-b720-70638467ccec
wind_farm_name: Fécamp
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 02/06/2020
resolved_value: 02/06/2020
research_value: 02/06/2020
resolved_fact_id: 42424.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EDF construction launch release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://france.edf-powersolutions.com/communiques/edf-renewables-enbridge-and-wpd-start-construction-of-the-fecamp-offshore-wind-farm/

research_summary:
Best open evidence is the 02/06/2020 construction-launch announcement stating launch followed finalisation of financing agreements over the weekend, supported by the 05/06/2020 EIB financing announcement. I use 02/06/2020 as the practical FID / financial close milestone date because that is the dated official public go-forward announcement.

source_of_record_url:
https://france.edf-powersolutions.com/communiques/edf-renewables-enbridge-and-wpd-start-construction-of-the-fecamp-offshore-wind-farm/


wind_farm_id: 6476
canonical_id: c4898c2c-34c7-4988-b720-70638467ccec
wind_farm_name: Fécamp
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/07/2023
resolved_value: 01/07/2023
research_value: 01/07/2023
resolved_fact_id: 42425.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.rte-france.com/actualites/bilan-electrique-normand-2023
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE Normandie electricity review 2023
source_of_record_url: https://www.rte-france.com/actualites/bilan-electrique-normand-2023
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Multiple authoritative sources state the first megawatt-hour was produced in July 2023, but no exact day was found in the accessible sources reviewed. Per the normalization rule, month-level evidence is recorded as 01/07/2023.


wind_farm_id: 6476
canonical_id: c4898c2c-34c7-4988-b720-70638467ccec
wind_farm_name: Fécamp
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2024-05-01
resolved_value: 2024-05-01
research_value: 15/05/2024
resolved_fact_id: 9815.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EDF commissioning release
research_source_type: owner/developer press release
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
EDF, Enbridge, CPP Investments and Skyborn all publicly announced inauguration / full operation in mid-May 2024.


wind_farm_id: 6477
canonical_id: 2f87ecdd-120f-48d5-9d0d-ff4f1e6513d4
wind_farm_name: Dieppe Le Tréport
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://dieppe-le-treport.eoliennes-mer.fr/le-parc/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dieppe Le Tréport project website
source_of_record_url: https://dieppe-le-treport.eoliennes-mer.fr/le-parc/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Dieppe Le Tréport; project company Éoliennes en Mer Dieppe Le Tréport (EMDT); alternative form used in sources: Dieppe-Le Tréport / Dieppe – Le Tréport

research_value:
Dieppe Le Tréport; project company Éoliennes en Mer Dieppe Le Tréport (EMDT); alternative form used in sources: Dieppe-Le Tréport / Dieppe – Le Tréport

research_summary:
Official project site and Ocean Winds both refer to the same project; government inquiry pages use “Parc éolien en mer de Dieppe-Le Tréport,” while the project site uses “Dieppe Le Tréport.” No identity mismatch found.


wind_farm_id: 6477
canonical_id: 2f87ecdd-120f-48d5-9d0d-ff4f1e6513d4
wind_farm_name: Dieppe Le Tréport
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 42708.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Caisse des Dépôts / Banque des Territoires article
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: EMDT / Ocean Winds-led consortium. Current owners: Ocean Winds 60.5%, Sumitomo Corporation 29.5%, Caisse des Dépôts / Banque des Territoires 10%. Operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: EMDT / Ocean Winds-led consortium. Current owners: Ocean Winds 60.5%, Sumitomo Corporation 29.5%, Caisse des Dépôts / Banque des Territoires 10%. Operator: Not confirmed

citation_url:
https://www.caissedesdepots.fr/eclairage/actualites/rte-le-futur-parc-eolien-dieppe-le-treport-connecte-au-reseau-electrique

research_summary:
Freshest dated ownership confirmation found is 16/04/2026 on Caisse des Dépôts / Banque des Territoires, which lists the full current share split. The project website matches the same percentages. I did not find a clearly project-specific authoritative page explicitly naming a separate long-term operator, so operator is left Not confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.caissedesdepots.fr/eclairage/actualites/rte-le-futur-parc-eolien-dieppe-le-treport-connecte-au-reseau-electrique


wind_farm_id: 6477
canonical_id: 2f87ecdd-120f-48d5-9d0d-ff4f1e6513d4
wind_farm_name: Dieppe Le Tréport
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Caisse des Dépôts / Banque des Territoires article
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Awarded in 2014 to EMDT; current ownership now Ocean Winds 60.5%, Sumitomo 29.5%, Caisse des Dépôts / Banque des Territoires 10%

research_value:
Awarded in 2014 to EMDT; current ownership now Ocean Winds 60.5%, Sumitomo 29.5%, Caisse des Dépôts / Banque des Territoires 10%

citation_url:
https://www.caissedesdepots.fr/eclairage/actualites/rte-le-futur-parc-eolien-dieppe-le-treport-connecte-au-reseau-electrique

research_summary:
Freshest dated source relied on for current ownership is 16/04/2026. Ocean Winds’ 26/04/2023 FID release confirms the shareholder group at FID; the project site and Caisse des Dépôts confirm the reconciled current percentages. Earlier developer references to ENGIE/EDPR are best understood through Ocean Winds, their 50:50 JV vehicle.


wind_farm_id: 6477
canonical_id: 2f87ecdd-120f-48d5-9d0d-ff4f1e6513d4
wind_farm_name: Dieppe Le Tréport
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Under Construction
resolved_value: Under Construction
research_value: Under Construction
resolved_fact_id: 42709.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://dieppe-le-treport.eoliennes-mer.fr/le-parc/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dieppe Le Tréport project website
source_of_record_url: https://dieppe-le-treport.eoliennes-mer.fr/le-parc/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Newer dated sources are clear that the project is in construction, not merely consented: Ocean Winds announced FID and construction start on 26/04/2023; the project website states construction began in 01/2024; a public consultation page from 2025 also says the project is in construction; and 2026 sources show grid connection ready ahead of energisation. Closest exact Boundary Layer label: Under Construction.


wind_farm_id: 6477
canonical_id: 2f87ecdd-120f-48d5-9d0d-ff4f1e6513d4
wind_farm_name: Dieppe Le Tréport
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 496 MW
resolved_value: 496 MW
research_value: 496 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42710.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://dieppe-le-treport.eoliennes-mer.fr/le-parc/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dieppe Le Tréport project website
source_of_record_url: https://dieppe-le-treport.eoliennes-mer.fr/le-parc/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Consistently stated across official project, government and RTE sources as 62 turbines of 8 MW each for 496 MW total.


wind_farm_id: 6477
canonical_id: 2f87ecdd-120f-48d5-9d0d-ff4f1e6513d4
wind_farm_name: Dieppe Le Tréport
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE project page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.rte-france.com/projets/nos-projets/raccordement-du-parc-eolien-en-mer-de-dieppe-le-treport

research_summary:
RTE confirms a double 225 kV connection but does not state a named MEC figure in MW on the accessible project page. To avoid conflating installed capacity with export capacity, MEC is left Not confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.rte-france.com/projets/nos-projets/raccordement-du-parc-eolien-en-mer-de-dieppe-le-treport


wind_farm_id: 6477
canonical_id: 2f87ecdd-120f-48d5-9d0d-ff4f1e6513d4
wind_farm_name: Dieppe Le Tréport
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: SG 8.0-167 DD
resolved_value: SG 8.0-167 DD
research_value: SG 8.0-167 DD
resolved_fact_id: 42711.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/content/siemens-gamesa/global/en/home/press-releases/siemens-gamesa-renewable-energy-will-deliver-its-d8-platform.html

research_summary:
Project-specific web evidence indicates Siemens Gamesa turbines for Dieppe Le Tréport; Siemens Gamesa’s France project press material ties the SG 8.0-167 DD platform to Dieppe-Le Tréport. Rotor/rating also align with project-specific 8 MW / 167 m references.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/content/siemens-gamesa/global/en/home/press-releases/siemens-gamesa-renewable-energy-will-deliver-its-d8-platform.html


wind_farm_id: 6477
canonical_id: 2f87ecdd-120f-48d5-9d0d-ff4f1e6513d4
wind_farm_name: Dieppe Le Tréport
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens Gamesa
resolved_value: Siemens Gamesa
research_value: Siemens Gamesa
resolved_fact_id: 42712.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ocean Winds FID release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.oceanwinds.com/news/uncategorized/dieppe-le-treport-offshore-wind-farm-reaches-final-investment-decision-and-starts-construction/

research_summary:
Ocean Winds says turbines will be produced by Siemens Gamesa at Le Havre; the project website also references Siemens Gamesa manufacturing linked to this project.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.oceanwinds.com/news/uncategorized/dieppe-le-treport-offshore-wind-farm-reaches-final-investment-decision-and-starts-construction/


wind_farm_id: 6477
canonical_id: 2f87ecdd-120f-48d5-9d0d-ff4f1e6513d4
wind_farm_name: Dieppe Le Tréport
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 167 m
resolved_value: 167 m
research_value: 167 m
resolved_fact_id: 42714.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa SG 8.0-167 product page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/products-and-services/offshore/wind-turbine-sg-8-0-167-dd.html

research_summary:
Project-specific turbine identification to SG 8.0-167 DD supports 167 m rotor diameter; Siemens Gamesa’s product page confirms 167 m for that model.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/products-and-services/offshore/wind-turbine-sg-8-0-167-dd.html


wind_farm_id: 6477
canonical_id: 2f87ecdd-120f-48d5-9d0d-ff4f1e6513d4
wind_farm_name: Dieppe Le Tréport
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa SG 8.0-167 product page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/products-and-services/offshore/wind-turbine-sg-8-0-167-dd.html

research_summary:
No project-specific accessible authoritative source found that explicitly states the Dieppe Le Tréport turbine hub height. Siemens Gamesa’s own turbine page says hub height is site specific, so it must not be inferred from the generic turbine model. No EuroWindWakes linked turbine fallback was provided in the project context.


wind_farm_id: 6477
canonical_id: 2f87ecdd-120f-48d5-9d0d-ff4f1e6513d4
wind_farm_name: Dieppe Le Tréport
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 62
resolved_value: 62
research_value: 62
resolved_fact_id: 42715.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://dieppe-le-treport.eoliennes-mer.fr/le-parc/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dieppe Le Tréport project website
source_of_record_url: https://dieppe-le-treport.eoliennes-mer.fr/le-parc/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official project, prefecture and Ocean Winds sources all support 62 turbines. This aligns with the non-web validation context candidate of 62 from EMODnet.


wind_farm_id: 6477
canonical_id: 2f87ecdd-120f-48d5-9d0d-ff4f1e6513d4
wind_farm_name: Dieppe Le Tréport
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Jacket foundations
resolved_value: Jacket foundations
research_value: Jacket foundations
resolved_fact_id: 42716.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://dieppe-le-treport.eoliennes-mer.fr/retombees/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dieppe Le Tréport project website - local impacts page
source_of_record_url: https://dieppe-le-treport.eoliennes-mer.fr/retombees/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project website explicitly says turbines are installed on metallic “jackets”; Ocean Winds’ 10/09/2025 release confirms the first turbine foundation is a jacket and describes jacket dimensions/piles.


wind_farm_id: 6477
canonical_id: 2f87ecdd-120f-48d5-9d0d-ff4f1e6513d4
wind_farm_name: Dieppe Le Tréport
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 26/02/2019
resolved_value: 26/02/2019
research_value: 26/02/2019
resolved_fact_id: 42717.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Seine-Maritime Prefecture project page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.seine-maritime.gouv.fr/Actions-de-l-Etat/Environnement-et-prevention-des-risques/Enquetes-publiques-et-Consultations-du-public/Enquetes-publiques/PARCS-EOLIENS-EN-MER/PROJET-D-INSTALLATION-D-UN-PARC-EOLIEN-EN-MER-ENTRE-DIEPPE-ET-LE-TREPORT/Parc-eolien-en-mer-de-Dieppe-Le-Treport

research_summary:
The Seine-Maritime prefecture page lists the project authorisation decrees downloadable with date 26/02/2019; Ocean Winds later summarises that administrative authorisations were obtained in 2019.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.seine-maritime.gouv.fr/Actions-de-l-Etat/Environnement-et-prevention-des-risques/Enquetes-publiques-et-Consultations-du-public/Enquetes-publiques/PARCS-EOLIENS-EN-MER/PROJET-D-INSTALLATION-D-UN-PARC-EOLIEN-EN-MER-ENTRE-DIEPPE-ET-LE-TREPORT/Parc-eolien-en-mer-de-Dieppe-Le-Treport


wind_farm_id: 6477
canonical_id: 2f87ecdd-120f-48d5-9d0d-ff4f1e6513d4
wind_farm_name: Dieppe Le Tréport
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 26/04/2023
resolved_value: 26/04/2023
research_value: 26/04/2023
resolved_fact_id: 42718.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ocean Winds FID release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.oceanwinds.com/news/uncategorized/dieppe-le-treport-offshore-wind-farm-reaches-final-investment-decision-and-starts-construction/

research_summary:
Ocean Winds states FID was announced on 26/04/2023 and financing agreements were signed that day; ENGIE states the same.


wind_farm_id: 6477
canonical_id: 2f87ecdd-120f-48d5-9d0d-ff4f1e6513d4
wind_farm_name: Dieppe Le Tréport
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/06/2026
resolved_value: 01/06/2026
research_value: 01/06/2026
resolved_fact_id: 42719.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Normandie Maritime article
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.normandie-maritime.fr/actualite/emr---parc-eolien-de-dieppe-le-treport---un-chantier-en-phase-finale/2275

research_summary:
No authoritative official source yet confirms achieved first power. A recent regional industry source says the project could produce first kilowatt-hours from June 2026. Because this is still forward-looking and month-level, the normalized date is 01/06/2026 and should be treated as expected first power, not achieved first power.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.normandie-maritime.fr/actualite/emr---parc-eolien-de-dieppe-le-treport---un-chantier-en-phase-finale/2275


wind_farm_id: 6477
canonical_id: 2f87ecdd-120f-48d5-9d0d-ff4f1e6513d4
wind_farm_name: Dieppe Le Tréport
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/12/2026
resolved_value: 01/12/2026
research_value: 01/12/2026
resolved_fact_id: 42720.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://dieppe-le-treport.eoliennes-mer.fr/le-parc/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dieppe Le Tréport project website
source_of_record_url: https://dieppe-le-treport.eoliennes-mer.fr/le-parc/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official and near-official sources consistently indicate commissioning / mise en service in fin 2026 or second half of 2026. As only month/part-year level is visible, this is normalized to 01/12/2026.


wind_farm_id: 6478
canonical_id: 42d3e5e1-bc61-4838-b0ea-f8e7ff6138fa
wind_farm_name: Centre-Manche 1
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://participer.parc-eolien-en-mer-manche-normandie.fr/blog/2315/le-projet
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMMN project page
source_of_record_url: https://participer.parc-eolien-en-mer-manche-normandie.fr/blog/2315/le-projet
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Centre-Manche 1; project company/developer branding: parc éolien en mer Manche Normandie; also referred to as AO4

research_value:
Centre-Manche 1; project company/developer branding: parc éolien en mer Manche Normandie; also referred to as AO4

research_summary:
French state project pages identify the target as Centre Manche 1. The developer’s own site states the project is “Manche Normandie (aussi appelé Centre Manche 1)”, so the official wind-farm branding differs from the state tender name but the identity matches.


wind_farm_id: 6478
canonical_id: 42d3e5e1-bc61-4838-b0ea-f8e7ff6138fa
wind_farm_name: Centre-Manche 1
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 42881.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://participer.parc-eolien-en-mer-manche-normandie.fr/blog/2315/le-projet
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMMN project page
source_of_record_url: https://participer.parc-eolien-en-mer-manche-normandie.fr/blog/2315/le-projet
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Eoliennes en Mer Manche Normandie (EMMN). Current owners / equity partners: EDF power solutions (sole owner after Maple Power exit). Operator: Not confirmed separately; EMMN is described as responsible for design, construction, operation and decommissioning.

resolved_value:
Developer: Eoliennes en Mer Manche Normandie (EMMN). Current owners / equity partners: EDF power solutions (sole owner after Maple Power exit). Operator: Not confirmed separately; EMMN is described as responsible for design, construction, operation and decommissioning.

research_summary:
The EMMN project page (02/04/2024) confirms original two-partner JV. Maple Power exited Oct 2025 per inspiratia and GreenUnivers, leaving EDF Renouvelables as sole owner. Bloomberg concurrently reports EDF seeking renegotiated CfD terms, indicating project viability concerns under the original auction price. EMMN remains the project company.


wind_farm_id: 6478
canonical_id: 42d3e5e1-bc61-4838-b0ea-f8e7ff6138fa
wind_farm_name: Centre-Manche 1
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EDF press release
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
27/03/2023 to Oct 2025: project held by EMMN, a JV of EDF Renouvelables / EDF power solutions and Maple Power; ownership percentages Not confirmed. Oct 2025: Maple Power exited the JV; EDF Renouvelables / EDF power solutions became sole owner.

research_value:
27/03/2023 to Oct 2025: project held by EMMN, a JV of EDF Renouvelables / EDF power solutions and Maple Power; ownership percentages Not confirmed. Oct 2025: Maple Power exited the JV; EDF Renouvelables / EDF power solutions became sole owner.

citation_url:
https://www.edf.fr/sites/groupe/files/epresspack/4929/CP-Le-groupe-EDF-et-Maple-Power-remportent-un-projet-e%CC%81olien-en-mer.pdf

research_summary:
Two sources report Maple Power's exit. The inspiratia article title (24/10/2025) states "Maple Power exits EDF JV for French offshore wind farm". This follows the April 2024 refocusing of Maple Power's shareholders (CPP Investments, Enbridge) on France-only operations. Bloomberg (24/10/2025) reports EDF is simultaneously seeking renegotiated CfD terms, suggesting the project is unprofitable at current prices — a likely driver of Maple Power's exit. Official sources have not yet updated the project's ownership page.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.edf.fr/sites/groupe/files/epresspack/4929/CP-Le-groupe-EDF-et-Maple-Power-remportent-un-projet-e%CC%81olien-en-mer.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6478
canonical_id: 42d3e5e1-bc61-4838-b0ea-f8e7ff6138fa
wind_farm_name: Centre-Manche 1
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
research_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_fact_id: 42882.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Manche Prefecture CM1 grid connection authorization page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.manche.gouv.fr/Publications/Annonces-et-avis/Arretes/Environnement/Autorisation-environnementale-Raccordement-parc-eolien-en-mer-CM1

research_summary:
The project remains in development rather than consented or under construction. EMMN’s 2024 concertation report said the authorization application was planned for Q1 2025; by late 2025/early 2026 official state/regulatory pages show the project and its grid connection were in public inquiry / authorization processing, and the CM1 grid connection received environmental authorization on 17/02/2026. That supports a closest Boundary Layer status of In Planning / Consent Application Submitted for the wind farm project.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.manche.gouv.fr/Publications/Annonces-et-avis/Arretes/Environnement/Autorisation-environnementale-Raccordement-parc-eolien-en-mer-CM1


wind_farm_id: 6478
canonical_id: 42d3e5e1-bc61-4838-b0ea-f8e7ff6138fa
wind_farm_name: Centre-Manche 1
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1,050 MW planned
resolved_value: 1,050 MW planned
research_value: 1,050 MW planned
resolved_fact_id: 42883.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://participer.parc-eolien-en-mer-manche-normandie.fr/blog/2315/le-projet
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMMN project page
source_of_record_url: https://participer.parc-eolien-en-mer-manche-normandie.fr/blog/2315/le-projet
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Multiple project-specific sources support a planned capacity range of 1000–1050 MW, with the developer commonly presenting the project as 1,050 MW maximum. This differs slightly from the EMODnet fallback row’s 1000 MW and likely reflects earlier rounded tender-stage data.


wind_farm_id: 6478
canonical_id: 42d3e5e1-bc61-4838-b0ea-f8e7ff6138fa
wind_farm_name: Centre-Manche 1
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1,250 MW
resolved_value: 1,250 MW
research_value: 1,250 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42884.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.hitachienergy.com/news-and-events/customer-stories/centre-manche-1
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Hitachi Energy customer story
source_of_record_url: https://www.hitachienergy.com/news-and-events/customer-stories/centre-manche-1
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific public sources for CM1’s HVDC connection state a transmission capacity of 1,250 MW. This appears to be the export / transmission capacity rather than the wind farm’s planned installed capacity of 1,050 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6478
canonical_id: 42d3e5e1-bc61-4838-b0ea-f8e7ff6138fa
wind_farm_name: Centre-Manche 1
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMMN ICS presentation 03/04/2024
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://participer.parc-eolien-en-mer-manche-normandie.fr/media/122be7ae2fe8a56de808/03-04-2024_Pr__sentation_1__re_ICS_Centre_Manche_1_Eoliennes_en_Mer_Manche_Normandie.pdf

research_summary:
No authoritative project-specific source found naming the selected turbine model for Centre-Manche 1 / Manche Normandie. Public project materials only give parameter ranges, not a final OEM/model selection. No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided, so this remains Not confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://participer.parc-eolien-en-mer-manche-normandie.fr/media/122be7ae2fe8a56de808/03-04-2024_Pr__sentation_1__re_ICS_Centre_Manche_1_Eoliennes_en_Mer_Manche_Normandie.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6478
canonical_id: 42d3e5e1-bc61-4838-b0ea-f8e7ff6138fa
wind_farm_name: Centre-Manche 1
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMMN ICS presentation 03/04/2024
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://participer.parc-eolien-en-mer-manche-normandie.fr/media/122be7ae2fe8a56de808/03-04-2024_Pr__sentation_1__re_ICS_Centre_Manche_1_Eoliennes_en_Mer_Manche_Normandie.pdf

research_summary:
No project-specific source located that explicitly identifies the selected turbine OEM for Centre-Manche 1. Public materials remain at technology-envelope stage only.


wind_farm_id: 6478
canonical_id: 42d3e5e1-bc61-4838-b0ea-f8e7ff6138fa
wind_farm_name: Centre-Manche 1
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 21.3–28 MW planned envelope
resolved_value: 21.3–28 MW planned envelope
research_value: 21.3–28 MW planned envelope
resolved_fact_id: 42885.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMMN ICS presentation 03/04/2024
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No final turbine has been selected publicly, but the developer’s 03/04/2024 ICS presentation explicitly gives a project-specific planned envelope of 21.3 to 28 MW per turbine. Because this is tied to this project, it is acceptable as the current planned value range rather than a final as-built figure.


wind_farm_id: 6478
canonical_id: 42d3e5e1-bc61-4838-b0ea-f8e7ff6138fa
wind_farm_name: Centre-Manche 1
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 276–330 m planned envelope
resolved_value: 276–330 m planned envelope
research_value: 276–330 m planned envelope
resolved_fact_id: 42886.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMMN ICS presentation 03/04/2024
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No final turbine model is publicly confirmed. The project-specific ICS presentation gives a planned rotor-diameter range of 276 to 330 m for Centre-Manche 1.


wind_farm_id: 6478
canonical_id: 42d3e5e1-bc61-4838-b0ea-f8e7ff6138fa
wind_farm_name: Centre-Manche 1
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 160–205 m planned envelope
resolved_value: 160–205 m planned envelope
research_value: 160–205 m planned envelope
resolved_fact_id: 42887.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMMN ICS presentation 03/04/2024
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No final turbine model / hub height is confirmed. The project-specific ICS presentation gives a hub-height range (hauteur de moyeu) of 160 to 205 m. No EuroWindWakes linked fallback exists here, so a final single figure cannot be confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6478
canonical_id: 42d3e5e1-bc61-4838-b0ea-f8e7ff6138fa
wind_farm_name: Centre-Manche 1
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 47 planned
resolved_value: Up to 47 planned
research_value: Up to 47 planned
resolved_fact_id: 42888.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://participer.parc-eolien-en-mer-manche-normandie.fr/blog/2315/le-projet
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMMN project page
source_of_record_url: https://participer.parc-eolien-en-mer-manche-normandie.fr/blog/2315/le-projet
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific sources say the wind farm will have a maximum of 47 turbines. This differs from the database validation signal of 0 from EMODnet; the mismatch is best explained by EMODnet still carrying a placeholder / concept-stage turbine count while current project materials describe the planned envelope.


wind_farm_id: 6478
canonical_id: 42d3e5e1-bc61-4838-b0ea-f8e7ff6138fa
wind_farm_name: Centre-Manche 1
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopiles or jackets planned; final type not confirmed
resolved_value: Monopiles or jackets planned; final type not confirmed
research_value: Monopiles or jackets planned; final type not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 42889.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMMN ICS presentation 03/04/2024
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific materials explicitly present jackets ou monopieux as the foundation options still under study. No final project-specific commitment to one type was found, so the as-built foundation type remains Not confirmed; the current planned options are reported here.


wind_farm_id: 6478
canonical_id: 42d3e5e1-bc61-4838-b0ea-f8e7ff6138fa
wind_farm_name: Centre-Manche 1
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Manche Prefecture CM1 grid connection authorization page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.manche.gouv.fr/Publications/Annonces-et-avis/Arretes/Environnement/Autorisation-environnementale-Raccordement-parc-eolien-en-mer-CM1

research_summary:
No authoritative source located confirming that the wind farm itself has received its final project consent. The available 17/02/2026 authorization found is for the RTE grid connection, not clearly the generating project consent.


wind_farm_id: 6478
canonical_id: 42d3e5e1-bc61-4838-b0ea-f8e7ff6138fa
wind_farm_name: Centre-Manche 1
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://participer.parc-eolien-en-mer-manche-normandie.fr/blog/2315/le-projet
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMMN project page
source_of_record_url: https://participer.parc-eolien-en-mer-manche-normandie.fr/blog/2315/le-projet
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No authoritative project-specific source found stating FID has been taken for Centre-Manche 1. Available public materials still describe development / authorization stages.


wind_farm_id: 6478
canonical_id: 42d3e5e1-bc61-4838-b0ea-f8e7ff6138fa
wind_farm_name: Centre-Manche 1
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMMN 2024 concertation report
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://participer.parc-eolien-en-mer-manche-normandie.fr/media/1490711f62e335ec7a7a/2024-06-27_EMMN_Bilan_de_la_concertation_2023_-_2024_VF.pdf

research_summary:
No first-power milestone is confirmed because the project is not yet under construction / operational on the evidence reviewed.

source_of_record_url:
https://participer.parc-eolien-en-mer-manche-normandie.fr/media/1490711f62e335ec7a7a/2024-06-27_EMMN_Bilan_de_la_concertation_2023_-_2024_VF.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6478
canonical_id: 42d3e5e1-bc61-4838-b0ea-f8e7ff6138fa
wind_farm_name: Centre-Manche 1
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMMN 2024 concertation report
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://participer.parc-eolien-en-mer-manche-normandie.fr/media/1490711f62e335ec7a7a/2024-06-27_EMMN_Bilan_de_la_concertation_2023_-_2024_VF.pdf

research_summary:
No full commissioning date is confirmed. The 2024 EMMN concertation report indicated a development / authorization phase through 2027 and construction in 2028–2032, implying operation from 2032, but this is a planning schedule rather than a confirmed commissioning date.


wind_farm_id: 6479
canonical_id: b2d9e15c-e030-4cc7-bf10-7082dd4a8ee3
wind_farm_name: Sud de la Bretagne - Zone appel d'offre
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Sud de la Bretagne; awarded project name: Pennavel
research_value: Sud de la Bretagne; awarded project name: Pennavel
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: French government award press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://presse.economie.gouv.fr/le-gouvernement-annonce-le-laureat-du-premier-appel-doffres-eolien-flottant-au-sud-de-la-bretagne/

research_summary:
Identity nuance: official state and grid sources still refer to the site/tender as a floating wind project “au sud de la Bretagne”, while the awarded project company and project brand is Pennavel. I have treated “Sud de la Bretagne” as the target identity and noted Pennavel as the awarded project rather than silently substituting names.

source_of_record_url:
https://presse.economie.gouv.fr/le-gouvernement-annonce-le-laureat-du-premier-appel-doffres-eolien-flottant-au-sud-de-la-bretagne/


wind_farm_id: 6479
canonical_id: b2d9e15c-e030-4cc7-bf10-7082dd4a8ee3
wind_farm_name: Sud de la Bretagne - Zone appel d'offre
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 42899.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Elicio news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Pennavel consortium; founding partners: Elicio France and BayWa r.e. France; current project company shareholders confirmed to include Elicio France, BayWa r.e. France, and Q ENERGY; operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: Pennavel consortium; founding partners: Elicio France and BayWa r.e. France; current project company shareholders confirmed to include Elicio France, BayWa r.e. France, and Q ENERGY; operator: Not confirmed

citation_url:
https://www.elicio.be/en/newsitem/pennavel-announces-q-energy-s-acquisition-of-a-stake-in-its-capital

research_summary:
Freshest ownership source date relied on: 17/03/2026. Elicio’s dated update says Q ENERGY entered Pennavel’s capital in March 2026; Pennavel’s project-developers page confirms the project is jointly run by Elicio, BayWa r.e. and Q ENERGY. No accessible source found with reconciled percentage shares, so percentages remain Not confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.elicio.be/en/newsitem/pennavel-announces-q-energy-s-acquisition-of-a-stake-in-its-capital


wind_farm_id: 6479
canonical_id: b2d9e15c-e030-4cc7-bf10-7082dd4a8ee3
wind_farm_name: Sud de la Bretagne - Zone appel d'offre
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Elicio news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
15/05/2024 award to consortium of Elicio and BayWa r.e.; 17/03/2026 Q ENERGY acquired a stake in Pennavel capital; percentages Not confirmed

research_value:
15/05/2024 award to consortium of Elicio and BayWa r.e.; 17/03/2026 Q ENERGY acquired a stake in Pennavel capital; percentages Not confirmed

citation_url:
https://www.elicio.be/en/newsitem/pennavel-announces-q-energy-s-acquisition-of-a-stake-in-its-capital

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on: 17/03/2026. Government and BayWa r.e. sources confirm the original winning consortium was Elicio + BayWa r.e.; Elicio and Pennavel news confirm Q ENERGY later joined the capital. No authoritative open source found that gives the post-transaction share split summing to 100%, so I have not inferred percentages.


wind_farm_id: 6479
canonical_id: b2d9e15c-e030-4cc7-bf10-7082dd4a8ee3
wind_farm_name: Sud de la Bretagne - Zone appel d'offre
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
research_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_fact_id: 42900.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.pennavel.bzh/en/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Pennavel English homepage
source_of_record_url: https://www.pennavel.bzh/en/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Best-fit Boundary Layer label is In Planning / Consent Application Submitted. The Pennavel English timeline page explicitly shows “2025–2026 Drafting, submission, and review of permit applications”; the October 2024 Pennavel release said the environmental authorization dossier was to be filed in autumn 2025; and RTE says public inquiry for the shared grid connection is planned for 2026. I did not find a clearly accessible regulator page confirming final consent yet.


wind_farm_id: 6479
canonical_id: b2d9e15c-e030-4cc7-bf10-7082dd4a8ee3
wind_farm_name: Sud de la Bretagne - Zone appel d'offre
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 250 MW planned
resolved_value: 250 MW planned
research_value: 250 MW planned
resolved_fact_id: 42901.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: French government award press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://presse.economie.gouv.fr/le-gouvernement-annonce-le-laureat-du-premier-appel-doffres-eolien-flottant-au-sud-de-la-bretagne/

research_summary:
The state award notice, Pennavel site, and regional sources consistently describe the first South Brittany floating project as 250 MW. Pennavel materials also note a tender band of 230-270 MW and some pages say “up to 270 MW”; for the profile value I use the named project capacity of 250 MW because that is the most consistently cited project figure.


wind_farm_id: 6479
canonical_id: b2d9e15c-e030-4cc7-bf10-7082dd4a8ee3
wind_farm_name: Sud de la Bretagne - Zone appel d'offre
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE South Brittany grid project page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.rte-france.com/projets/nos-projets/projet-deoliennes-flottantes-au-sud-de-la-bretagne?page=1

research_summary:
No accessible project-specific source found that explicitly states a project MEC distinct from planned installed capacity. RTE confirms a 225 kV connection concept and a shared grid scheme for South Brittany, but not a project-level MEC value for the 250 MW project.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.rte-france.com/projets/nos-projets/projet-deoliennes-flottantes-au-sud-de-la-bretagne?page=1


wind_farm_id: 6479
canonical_id: b2d9e15c-e030-4cc7-bf10-7082dd4a8ee3
wind_farm_name: Sud de la Bretagne - Zone appel d'offre
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.pennavel.bzh/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Pennavel homepage
source_of_record_url: https://www.pennavel.bzh/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided, so no dataset fallback was available under the Stage 3 rule. Pennavel says final technical choices and turbine orders are still future steps; no authoritative source found naming a turbine model for this exact project.


wind_farm_id: 6479
canonical_id: b2d9e15c-e030-4cc7-bf10-7082dd4a8ee3
wind_farm_name: Sud de la Bretagne - Zone appel d'offre
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Pennavel industrial organisation April 2025
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.pennavel.bzh/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Pennavel_Organisationindustrielleprevisionnelleavril2025.pdf

research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided, so no dataset fallback was available under the Stage 3 rule. Pennavel’s April 2025 industrial document shows turbine procurement still in pre-selection/technical studies, so OEM is not yet confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.pennavel.bzh/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Pennavel_Organisationindustrielleprevisionnelleavril2025.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6479
canonical_id: b2d9e15c-e030-4cc7-bf10-7082dd4a8ee3
wind_farm_name: Sud de la Bretagne - Zone appel d'offre
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.pennavel.bzh/question/bonjour-combien-y-aura-til-deolienne-flottante/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Pennavel Q&A on turbine count
source_of_record_url: https://www.pennavel.bzh/question/bonjour-combien-y-aura-til-deolienne-flottante/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided, so no dataset fallback was available under the Stage 3 rule. Because the turbine model is not confirmed, individual turbine rating is also not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6479
canonical_id: b2d9e15c-e030-4cc7-bf10-7082dd4a8ee3
wind_farm_name: Sud de la Bretagne - Zone appel d'offre
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Pennavel industrial organisation April 2025
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.pennavel.bzh/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Pennavel_Organisationindustrielleprevisionnelleavril2025.pdf

research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided, so no dataset fallback was available under the Stage 3 rule. Pennavel’s April 2025 industrial document gives only a preliminary range Ø 250-300 m for the rotor, not a final confirmed project specification.


wind_farm_id: 6479
canonical_id: b2d9e15c-e030-4cc7-bf10-7082dd4a8ee3
wind_farm_name: Sud de la Bretagne - Zone appel d'offre
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Pennavel industrial organisation April 2025
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided, so no dataset fallback was available under the Stage 3 rule. No authoritative source found with a project-specific hub height. Pennavel’s April 2025 industrial document gives only an indicative tower height of about 180 m, which is not the same as confirmed hub height.


wind_farm_id: 6479
canonical_id: b2d9e15c-e030-4cc7-bf10-7082dd4a8ee3
wind_farm_name: Sud de la Bretagne - Zone appel d'offre
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 13 planned
resolved_value: 13 planned
research_value: 13 planned
resolved_fact_id: 43087.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.pennavel.bzh/question/bonjour-combien-y-aura-til-deolienne-flottante/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Pennavel Q&A on turbine count
source_of_record_url: https://www.pennavel.bzh/question/bonjour-combien-y-aura-til-deolienne-flottante/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Pennavel’s dated April 2026 Q&A explicitly says the project currently plans 13 floating turbines for 230-270 MW. This differs from the database validation signal of 0 from EMODnet; likely reason is that EMODnet still reflects an early concept boundary without awarded-project turbine detail.


wind_farm_id: 6479
canonical_id: b2d9e15c-e030-4cc7-bf10-7082dd4a8ee3
wind_farm_name: Sud de la Bretagne - Zone appel d'offre
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Floating semi-submersible or other floating foundation; final type Not confirmed
resolved_value: Floating semi-submersible or other floating foundation; final type Not confirmed
research_value: Floating semi-submersible or other floating foundation; final type Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 42902.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Pennavel industrial organisation April 2025
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Foundation concept is clearly floating, but not finally selected. Pennavel’s April 2025 industrial document says “Semi-submersible (ou autre)”, so the exact floating substructure type is still unconfirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6479
canonical_id: b2d9e15c-e030-4cc7-bf10-7082dd4a8ee3
wind_farm_name: Sud de la Bretagne - Zone appel d'offre
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Pennavel environmental impact press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.pennavel.bzh/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/2024.10.16-Pennavel-confie-son-etude-dimpact-environnementale-a-setec-energie-environnement.pdf

research_summary:
No accessible authoritative source found confirming that environmental consent has been granted. Available sources indicate dossier preparation/submission and ongoing planning rather than an issued consent.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.pennavel.bzh/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/2024.10.16-Pennavel-confie-son-etude-dimpact-environnementale-a-setec-energie-environnement.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6479
canonical_id: b2d9e15c-e030-4cc7-bf10-7082dd4a8ee3
wind_farm_name: Sud de la Bretagne - Zone appel d'offre
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/01/2028
resolved_value: 01/01/2028
research_value: 01/01/2028
resolved_fact_id: 43089.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.pennavel.bzh/en/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Pennavel English homepage
source_of_record_url: https://www.pennavel.bzh/en/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Pennavel’s accessible English timeline page explicitly says 2028 Final investment decision. An April 2025 industrial document also says 2029 envisaged for the investment decision, so this remains a forecast with some source conflict; I retain 01/01/2028 because it is the current live project-website timeline.


wind_farm_id: 6479
canonical_id: b2d9e15c-e030-4cc7-bf10-7082dd4a8ee3
wind_farm_name: Sud de la Bretagne - Zone appel d'offre
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/01/2032
resolved_value: 01/01/2032
research_value: 01/01/2032
resolved_fact_id: 43105.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.pennavel.bzh/en/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Pennavel English homepage
source_of_record_url: https://www.pennavel.bzh/en/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No source found for a separate first-power milestone. Pennavel’s accessible English timeline says From 2032 onward Operation of the wind farm, so I use 01/01/2032 as a year-level proxy for first power, with low confidence.


wind_farm_id: 6479
canonical_id: b2d9e15c-e030-4cc7-bf10-7082dd4a8ee3
wind_farm_name: Sud de la Bretagne - Zone appel d'offre
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/01/2032
resolved_value: 01/01/2032
research_value: 01/01/2032
resolved_fact_id: 42903.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.pennavel.bzh/en/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Pennavel English homepage
source_of_record_url: https://www.pennavel.bzh/en/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No as-built date exists yet; this is a forecast. Pennavel’s accessible English timeline indicates operation from 2032 onward, while the April 2025 industrial document shows an envisaged service date of 2031. I use 01/01/2032 as the current website-led estimate and note the conflict.


wind_farm_id: 6480
canonical_id: ec853731-2073-478d-af5a-643464225f90
wind_farm_name: Dunkerque
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-dunkerque.fr/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Parc éolien en mer de Dunkerque official website
source_of_record_url: https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-dunkerque.fr/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Parc éolien en mer de Dunkerque; English: Dunkirk offshore wind farm; project company: Éoliennes en Mer de Dunkerque (EMD)

research_value:
Parc éolien en mer de Dunkerque; English: Dunkirk offshore wind farm; project company: Éoliennes en Mer de Dunkerque (EMD)

research_summary:
Official project site uses “Parc éolien en mer de Dunkerque”; RTE uses the same identity for the wind farm and grid connection. The project company is EMD.


wind_farm_id: 6480
canonical_id: ec853731-2073-478d-af5a-643464225f90
wind_farm_name: Dunkerque
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 42721.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-dunkerque.fr/presentation-du-projet/les-porteurs-du-projet/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Parc éolien en mer de Dunkerque - Les porteurs du projet
source_of_record_url: https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-dunkerque.fr/presentation-du-projet/les-porteurs-du-projet/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Éoliennes en Mer de Dunkerque (EMD), composed of EDF power solutions and Enbridge Éolien France S.a.r.l.; Grid connection owner/developer: RTE; Current equity split: Not confirmed; Operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: Éoliennes en Mer de Dunkerque (EMD), composed of EDF power solutions and Enbridge Éolien France S.a.r.l.; Grid connection owner/developer: RTE; Current equity split: Not confirmed; Operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
Freshest dated authoritative owner/developer evidence found is the project site and dated 2025–2026 project materials, which state EMD is composed of EDF power solutions and Enbridge Éolien France. I did not confirm a full current equity percentage split from a current official JV/owner page, so percentages remain Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6480
canonical_id: ec853731-2073-478d-af5a-643464225f90
wind_farm_name: Dunkerque
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EDF press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
2019 award: EDF Renouvelables + Innogy + Enbridge; current confirmed development company identity: EMD composed of EDF power solutions + Enbridge Éolien France; RWE/Innogy continuing ownership today: Not confirmed

research_value:
2019 award: EDF Renouvelables + Innogy + Enbridge; current confirmed development company identity: EMD composed of EDF power solutions + Enbridge Éolien France; RWE/Innogy continuing ownership today: Not confirmed

citation_url:
https://www.edf.fr/groupe-edf/espaces-dedies/journalistes/tous-les-communiques-de-presse/le-consortium-mene-par-le-groupe-edf-remporte-le-projet-eolien-en-mer-de-dunkerque

research_summary:
EDF’s 14/06/2019 award press release names EDF, Innogy and Enbridge in the winning consortium. Newer official project materials in 2025 identify EMD as composed of EDF power solutions and Enbridge Éolien France, indicating a later ownership/developer evolution, but I did not find a current official page that reconciles the full historical transfer chain with percentages. Freshest relied-on source date: 18/02/2025 project update plus 2025 project materials.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.edf.fr/groupe-edf/espaces-dedies/journalistes/tous-les-communiques-de-presse/le-consortium-mene-par-le-groupe-edf-remporte-le-projet-eolien-en-mer-de-dunkerque


wind_farm_id: 6480
canonical_id: ec853731-2073-478d-af5a-643464225f90
wind_farm_name: Dunkerque
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Consented
resolved_value: Consented
research_value: Consented
resolved_fact_id: 42722.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Parc éolien en mer de Dunkerque project update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-dunkerque.fr/2025/02/18/obtention-des-autorisations-pour-le-developpement-du-parc-eolien-en-mer-de-dunkerque/

research_summary:
The project obtained its environmental authorization on 14/02/2025 for construction and operation of the wind farm. RTE’s connection works are progressing, but the wind farm itself is not evidenced as under construction or at FID; closest Boundary Layer label is therefore Consented.

source_of_record_url:
https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-dunkerque.fr/2025/02/18/obtention-des-autorisations-pour-le-developpement-du-parc-eolien-en-mer-de-dunkerque/


wind_farm_id: 6480
canonical_id: ec853731-2073-478d-af5a-643464225f90
wind_farm_name: Dunkerque
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 600 MW
resolved_value: 600 MW
research_value: 600 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42723.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-dunkerque.fr/presentation-du-projet/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Parc éolien en mer de Dunkerque - Présentation du projet
source_of_record_url: https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-dunkerque.fr/presentation-du-projet/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official project and RTE pages consistently describe the project as having a maximum / planned capacity of 600 MW. This broadly aligns with the database fallback value of 598 MW, likely a dataset rounding/legacy difference.


wind_farm_id: 6480
canonical_id: ec853731-2073-478d-af5a-643464225f90
wind_farm_name: Dunkerque
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 600 MW (not separately evidenced as MEC; project maximum capacity used as closest confirmed value)
resolved_value: 600 MW (not separately evidenced as MEC; project maximum capacity used as closest confirmed value)
research_value: 600 MW (not separately evidenced as MEC; project maximum capacity used as closest confirmed value)
resolved_fact_id: 42724.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.rte-france.com/projets/nos-projets/raccordement-parc-eolien-mer-dunkerque
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.rte-france.com/projets/nos-projets/raccordement-parc-eolien-mer-dunkerque
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I did not find an accessible source explicitly labeled “MEC” for the wind farm. RTE states a puissance maximale de 600 MW for the project and describes a 225 kV HVAC connection. I therefore use 600 MW as the closest confirmed export-related cap, while noting this is not explicitly labeled MEC.


wind_farm_id: 6480
canonical_id: ec853731-2073-478d-af5a-643464225f90
wind_farm_name: Dunkerque
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-dunkerque.fr/presentation-du-projet/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Parc éolien en mer de Dunkerque - Présentation du projet
source_of_record_url: https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-dunkerque.fr/presentation-du-projet/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official project sources say final layout and characteristics will be defined after permits and technical studies. No project-specific current official source reviewed explicitly confirmed a turbine model. Per instruction, no model is inferred from generic OEM pages or other projects.


wind_farm_id: 6480
canonical_id: ec853731-2073-478d-af5a-643464225f90
wind_farm_name: Dunkerque
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-dunkerque.fr/presentation-du-projet/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Parc éolien en mer de Dunkerque - Présentation du projet
source_of_record_url: https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-dunkerque.fr/presentation-du-projet/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific source reviewed explicitly names the turbine OEM for Dunkerque. Left unconfirmed to avoid inference.


wind_farm_id: 6480
canonical_id: ec853731-2073-478d-af5a-643464225f90
wind_farm_name: Dunkerque
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-dunkerque.fr/presentation-du-projet/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Parc éolien en mer de Dunkerque - Présentation du projet
source_of_record_url: https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-dunkerque.fr/presentation-du-projet/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific official source reviewed explicitly confirms per-turbine rating. Since there is no linked EuroWindWakes turbine row in the prompt, this remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6480
canonical_id: ec853731-2073-478d-af5a-643464225f90
wind_farm_name: Dunkerque
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-dunkerque.fr/lenvironnement/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Parc éolien en mer de Dunkerque - Environnement
source_of_record_url: https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-dunkerque.fr/lenvironnement/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific source reviewed explicitly confirms hub height for Dunkerque. Per instruction, this is not inferred from a turbine platform.


wind_farm_id: 6480
canonical_id: ec853731-2073-478d-af5a-643464225f90
wind_farm_name: Dunkerque
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 46 maximum
resolved_value: 46 maximum
research_value: 46 maximum
resolved_fact_id: 42725.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-dunkerque.fr/presentation-du-projet/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Parc éolien en mer de Dunkerque - Présentation du projet
source_of_record_url: https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-dunkerque.fr/presentation-du-projet/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official project sources consistently state 46 éoliennes au maximum. This differs from the EMODnet validation signal of 0 turbines; the likely reason is that the dataset count is outdated or non-populated for a still-unbuilt consented project.


wind_farm_id: 6480
canonical_id: ec853731-2073-478d-af5a-643464225f90
wind_farm_name: Dunkerque
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile
resolved_value: Monopile
research_value: Monopile
resolved_fact_id: 42726.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-dunkerque.fr/presentation-du-projet/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Parc éolien en mer de Dunkerque - Présentation du projet
source_of_record_url: https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-dunkerque.fr/presentation-du-projet/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official project sources state the project foresees up to 46 turbines installed on fondations de type monopieu.


wind_farm_id: 6480
canonical_id: ec853731-2073-478d-af5a-643464225f90
wind_farm_name: Dunkerque
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 14/02/2025
resolved_value: 14/02/2025
research_value: 14/02/2025
resolved_fact_id: 42727.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Parc éolien en mer de Dunkerque project update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-dunkerque.fr/2025/02/18/obtention-des-autorisations-pour-le-developpement-du-parc-eolien-en-mer-de-dunkerque/

research_summary:
Project update states the Prefect of Nord delivered the environmental authorization on 14 February 2025; the prefectural acts register corroborates the same date.


wind_farm_id: 6480
canonical_id: ec853731-2073-478d-af5a-643464225f90
wind_farm_name: Dunkerque
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-dunkerque.fr/presentation-du-projet/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Parc éolien en mer de Dunkerque - Présentation du projet
source_of_record_url: https://parc-eolien-en-mer-de-dunkerque.fr/presentation-du-projet/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible authoritative source reviewed explicitly states that a project FID has been taken for the wind farm. Major connection and authorization milestones exist, but they are not the same as FID.


wind_farm_id: 6481
canonical_id: 76444ae9-82c8-4950-825b-4bc770ecd5d4
wind_farm_name: Faraman-Port-Saint-Louis-du-Rhône
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Provence Grand Large; alternative/site name: Faraman
research_value: Provence Grand Large; alternative/site name: Faraman
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE project page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.rte-france.com/projets/nos-projets/raccordement-dun-parc-eolien-flottant-pilote-au-large-du-golfe-de-fos-zone-de-faraman

research_summary:
Project, RTE, and secondary sources consistently identify the asset as Provence Grand Large in the Faraman zone. I found no evidence that “Provence Grand Large Faraman” is a separate project; the web evidence supports one 3-turbine pilot project at Faraman.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.rte-france.com/projets/nos-projets/raccordement-dun-parc-eolien-flottant-pilote-au-large-du-golfe-de-fos-zone-de-faraman


wind_farm_id: 6481
canonical_id: 76444ae9-82c8-4950-825b-4bc770ecd5d4
wind_farm_name: Faraman-Port-Saint-Louis-du-Rhône
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 42507.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://edf-renouvelables.com/provence-grand-large-mise-en-service-complete/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EDF Renouvelables press release
source_of_record_url: https://edf-renouvelables.com/provence-grand-large-mise-en-service-complete/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: EDF Renouvelables / EDF power solutions France; current owners: EDF Renouvelables and Enbridge Éolien France 2 S.a.r.l via Parc Eolien Offshore de Provence Grand Large; operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: EDF Renouvelables / EDF power solutions France; current owners: EDF Renouvelables and Enbridge Éolien France 2 S.a.r.l via Parc Eolien Offshore de Provence Grand Large; operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
Freshest ownership source date used: 05/06/2025. EDF and CPP Investments state full commissioning was announced by EDF Renouvelables and Enbridge Éolien France 2 S.a.r.l. Siemens Gamesa’s 12/06/2025 project article says the asset is owned by Parc Éolien Offshore de Provence Grand Large, a JV of EDF Renouvelables and Enbridge Eolien France 2. The project legal notice shows the project company remains Parc Eolien Offshore de Provence Grand Large, represented by EDF power solutions France. A distinct long-term operator is not clearly confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6481
canonical_id: 76444ae9-82c8-4950-825b-4bc770ecd5d4
wind_farm_name: Faraman-Port-Saint-Louis-du-Rhône
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Énergies de la Mer article
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Initially developed by EDF Renouvelables; by 2021 Enbridge and CPP Investments had entered via Enbridge Éolien France 2; by 05/06/2025 current partnership still presented as EDF Renouvelables + Enbridge Éolien France 2 S.a.r.l; ownership percentages Not confirmed

research_value:
Initially developed by EDF Renouvelables; by 2021 Enbridge and CPP Investments had entered via Enbridge Éolien France 2; by 05/06/2025 current partnership still presented as EDF Renouvelables + Enbridge Éolien France 2 S.a.r.l; ownership percentages Not confirmed

citation_url:
https://www.energiesdelamer.eu/2021/01/29/cpdp-parc-pilote-deoliennes-flottantes-provence-grand-large-au-large-du-golfe-de-fos/

research_summary:
Older project coverage shows the project company as EDF-owned during development. Freshest source date relied on for current ownership is 05/06/2025, confirming EDF Renouvelables together with Enbridge Éolien France 2 S.a.r.l. I did not find an open official project/JV source that reconciles the full current percentage split for Provence Grand Large itself, so ownership percentages remain Not confirmed rather than inferred from Enbridge/CPP corporate structures.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.energiesdelamer.eu/2021/01/29/cpdp-parc-pilote-deoliennes-flottantes-provence-grand-large-au-large-du-golfe-de-fos/


wind_farm_id: 6481
canonical_id: 76444ae9-82c8-4950-825b-4bc770ecd5d4
wind_farm_name: Faraman-Port-Saint-Louis-du-Rhône
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 42508.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EDF power solutions press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://france.edf-powersolutions.com/communiques/provence-grand-large-mise-en-service-complete-du-premier-parc-eolien-en-mer-flottant-francais/

research_summary:
EDF announced full commissioning on 05/06/2025. Enbridge’s current renewable assets page shows a November 2024 service date, but EDF’s dated project-specific commissioning statement is the stronger source for present Boundary Layer status. I therefore classify the asset as Operational, with the nuance that first production appears to have preceded full commissioning.

source_of_record_url:
https://france.edf-powersolutions.com/communiques/provence-grand-large-mise-en-service-complete-du-premier-parc-eolien-en-mer-flottant-francais/


wind_farm_id: 6481
canonical_id: 76444ae9-82c8-4950-825b-4bc770ecd5d4
wind_farm_name: Faraman-Port-Saint-Louis-du-Rhône
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 25 MW
resolved_value: 25 MW
research_value: 25 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42509.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://edf-renouvelables.com/provence-grand-large-mise-en-service-complete/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EDF Renouvelables press release
source_of_record_url: https://edf-renouvelables.com/provence-grand-large-mise-en-service-complete/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Recent owner/OEM sources describe Provence Grand Large as 25 MW. This is effectively consistent with the database cross-check value of 25.19 MW / 25.2 MW, likely reflecting turbine uprating conventions, but the current project-facing web sources consistently use 25 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6481
canonical_id: 76444ae9-82c8-4950-825b-4bc770ecd5d4
wind_farm_name: Faraman-Port-Saint-Louis-du-Rhône
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE project page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.rte-france.com/projets/nos-projets/raccordement-dun-parc-eolien-flottant-pilote-au-large-du-golfe-de-fos-zone-de-faraman

research_summary:
RTE confirms a 63 kV connection and the project-specific grid works, but I did not find an open authoritative source explicitly stating a project MEC figure. Per instruction, this remains Not confirmed rather than inferred from installed capacity or connection voltage.


wind_farm_id: 6481
canonical_id: 76444ae9-82c8-4950-825b-4bc770ecd5d4
wind_farm_name: Faraman-Port-Saint-Louis-du-Rhône
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens Gamesa SG 8.0-167 DD / 8 MW direct-drive platform
resolved_value: Siemens Gamesa SG 8.0-167 DD / 8 MW direct-drive platform
research_value: Siemens Gamesa SG 8.0-167 DD / 8 MW direct-drive platform
resolved_fact_id: 42510.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/press-releases/siemens-gamesa-to-supply-newest-8-mw-direct-drive-offshore-turbine-to-500-mw.html

research_summary:
Project-specific corroboration is good: Siemens Gamesa’s 10/01/2018 France release explicitly links Provence Grand Large to the SG 8.0-167 DD platform, and later project pages describe three Siemens Gamesa 8 MW turbines.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/press-releases/siemens-gamesa-to-supply-newest-8-mw-direct-drive-offshore-turbine-to-500-mw.html


wind_farm_id: 6481
canonical_id: 76444ae9-82c8-4950-825b-4bc770ecd5d4
wind_farm_name: Faraman-Port-Saint-Louis-du-Rhône
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 8.4 MW
resolved_value: 8.4 MW
research_value: 8.4 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42512.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SBM Offshore release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.sbmoffshore.com/newsroom/news-events/sbm-offshore-announces-successful-installation-3-floating-wind-units

research_summary:
The dead project factsheet URL was replaced. The current open supplier source for this project states that the three floating units each support an 8.4 MW wind turbine, so the reported value remains confirmed without relying on the dead PDF.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.sbmoffshore.com/newsroom/news-events/sbm-offshore-announces-successful-installation-3-floating-wind-units


wind_farm_id: 6481
canonical_id: 76444ae9-82c8-4950-825b-4bc770ecd5d4
wind_farm_name: Faraman-Port-Saint-Louis-du-Rhône
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 167 m
resolved_value: 167 m
research_value: 167 m
resolved_fact_id: 42513.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.thewindpower.net/windfarm_en_24152_provence-grand-large.php
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: The Wind Power entry
source_of_record_url: https://www.thewindpower.net/windfarm_en_24152_provence-grand-large.php
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Confirmed for this project by Siemens Gamesa’s project-linked 2018 release naming the SG 8.0-167 DD for Provence Grand Large, with secondary corroboration from The Wind Power.


wind_farm_id: 6481
canonical_id: 76444ae9-82c8-4950-825b-4bc770ecd5d4
wind_farm_name: Faraman-Port-Saint-Louis-du-Rhône
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa article
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/explore/journal/united-by-the-sea-how-people-came-together-to-build-france-first-floating-wind-farm.html

research_summary:
I did not find a project-specific authoritative source explicitly stating hub height for Provence Grand Large. Per the instruction not to infer site-specific turbine dimensions from generic turbine pages or other wind farms, this remains Not confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/explore/journal/united-by-the-sea-how-people-came-together-to-build-france-first-floating-wind-farm.html


wind_farm_id: 6481
canonical_id: 76444ae9-82c8-4950-825b-4bc770ecd5d4
wind_farm_name: Faraman-Port-Saint-Louis-du-Rhône
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 3
resolved_value: 3
research_value: 3
resolved_fact_id: 42514.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE project page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Strongly confirmed by project, RTE, EDF, and supplier sources. This aligns with the non-web validation signals in the database context, so no turbine-count discrepancy needs resolving.


wind_farm_id: 6481
canonical_id: 76444ae9-82c8-4950-825b-4bc770ecd5d4
wind_farm_name: Faraman-Port-Saint-Louis-du-Rhône
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Floating tension-leg platforms / floaters with taut mooring lines
resolved_value: Floating tension-leg platforms / floaters with taut mooring lines
research_value: Floating tension-leg platforms / floaters with taut mooring lines
resolved_fact_id: 42515.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.sbmoffshore.com/what-we-do/floating-offshore-wind/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SBM Offshore floating offshore wind page
source_of_record_url: https://www.sbmoffshore.com/what-we-do/floating-offshore-wind/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific sources consistently describe SBM Offshore / IFPEN floaters using tension leg / taut mooring technology. This appears to be a distinctive technical feature of Provence Grand Large.


wind_farm_id: 6481
canonical_id: 76444ae9-82c8-4950-825b-4bc770ecd5d4
wind_farm_name: Faraman-Port-Saint-Louis-du-Rhône
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/01/2019
resolved_value: 01/01/2019
research_value: 01/01/2019
resolved_fact_id: 42516.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE project page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
RTE states “Début 2019 : Obtention des autorisations” and the project site also says administrative authorisations were delivered in 2019. Exact day/month were not visible on the accessible pages reviewed, so year-only evidence is normalized to 01/01/2019.


wind_farm_id: 6481
canonical_id: 76444ae9-82c8-4950-825b-4bc770ecd5d4
wind_farm_name: Faraman-Port-Saint-Louis-du-Rhône
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/11/2024
resolved_value: 01/11/2024
research_value: 01/11/2024
resolved_fact_id: 42518.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.enbridge.com/About-Us/Renewable-Energy-FR
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Enbridge renewable energy page
source_of_record_url: https://www.enbridge.com/About-Us/Renewable-Energy-FR
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Enbridge’s current renewable assets page lists Provence Grand Large with a service date of November 2024, while EDF announced full commissioning only on 05/06/2025. The most likely interpretation is first power / initial operation in November 2024, followed by later full commissioning. Month-only evidence is normalized to 01/11/2024.


wind_farm_id: 6481
canonical_id: 76444ae9-82c8-4950-825b-4bc770ecd5d4
wind_farm_name: Faraman-Port-Saint-Louis-du-Rhône
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 05/06/2025
resolved_value: 05/06/2025
research_value: 05/06/2025
resolved_fact_id: 42519.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EDF power solutions press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://france.edf-powersolutions.com/communiques/provence-grand-large-mise-en-service-complete-du-premier-parc-eolien-en-mer-flottant-francais/

research_summary:
EDF’s open project-specific press release explicitly states “Paris le 5 juin 2025” and “mise en service complète”. I therefore retain 05/06/2025 and replace the unsupported CPP source-of-record with EDF’s accessible owner/developer page.


wind_farm_id: 6482
canonical_id: b5cdc244-1c9f-4330-bd00-541234eb538f
wind_farm_name: Gruissan
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: EolMed – Gruissan
research_value: EolMed – Gruissan
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE project page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.rte-france.com/projets/nos-projets/raccordement-du-parc-eolien-flottant-pilote-au-large-de-port-la-nouvelle-zone-de-gruissan

research_summary:
RTE uses the exact project name “EolMed – Gruissan” for the grid connection project, while Qair markets the same pilot farm as Eolmed off Port-La-Nouvelle/Gruissan. This resolves the name ambiguity in favor of the Gruissan-located EolMed pilot project.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.rte-france.com/projets/nos-projets/raccordement-du-parc-eolien-flottant-pilote-au-large-de-port-la-nouvelle-zone-de-gruissan


wind_farm_id: 6482
canonical_id: b5cdc244-1c9f-4330-bd00-541234eb538f
wind_farm_name: Gruissan
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 42606.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.qair.energy/realisations/eolmed/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Qair Eolmed project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.qair.energy/realisations/eolmed/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Qair / EOLMED SAS. Current owners publicly confirmed: Qair and TotalEnergies. Equity partners and percentages: TotalEnergies 20%; other regional equity interests referenced but full current split Not confirmed. Operator: Qair / EOLMED SAS.

resolved_value:
Developer: Qair / EOLMED SAS. Current owners publicly confirmed: Qair and TotalEnergies. Equity partners and percentages: TotalEnergies 20%; other regional equity interests referenced but full current split Not confirmed. Operator: Qair / EOLMED SAS.

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on for current control is 20/04/2026: Qair announced Eolmed energisation. Qair’s current project page states “TotalEnergies as joint project owner”. TotalEnergies’ official releases confirm it took a 20% stake on 07/10/2020. The 09/05/2022 Eolmed FID release references AREC, CALEN, Grand Narbonne and Amidéole as project shareholders/partners, but no open current source fully reconciles the remaining percentages to 100%, so they are not quantified here.


wind_farm_id: 6482
canonical_id: b5cdc244-1c9f-4330-bd00-541234eb538f
wind_farm_name: Gruissan
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://totalenergies.com/news/news/renewables-total-enters-floating-offshore-wind-sector-france
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: TotalEnergies press release
source_of_record_url: https://totalenergies.com/news/news/renewables-total-enters-floating-offshore-wind-sector-france
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Originally developed by Quadran Énergies Marines / Qair; AREC became a shareholder in 2017; TotalEnergies acquired 20% on 07/10/2020; current public sources show Qair and TotalEnergies as joint owners, with other regional shareholders referenced but not fully quantified.

research_value:
Originally developed by Quadran Énergies Marines / Qair; AREC became a shareholder in 2017; TotalEnergies acquired 20% on 07/10/2020; current public sources show Qair and TotalEnergies as joint owners, with other regional shareholders referenced but not fully quantified.

research_summary:
Freshest ownership source date relied on is 20/04/2026 for current project control by Qair, supplemented by Qair’s current project page and TotalEnergies’ dated 2020 entry announcement. Because no open official page currently reconciles all ownership percentages, full present-day split remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6482
canonical_id: b5cdc244-1c9f-4330-bd00-541234eb538f
wind_farm_name: Gruissan
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Under Construction
resolved_value: Under Construction
research_value: Under Construction
resolved_fact_id: 42607.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://france.qair.energy/qair-met-sous-tension-son-projet-pilote-deoliennes-flottantes/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Qair France press release
source_of_record_url: https://france.qair.energy/qair-met-sous-tension-son-projet-pilote-deoliennes-flottantes/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Qair’s 20/04/2026 release says the project has been energised and entered a technical testing phase, ready to inject first MWh. That is beyond installation but not clearly full commercial operation. This is closest to Boundary Layer Under Construction.


wind_farm_id: 6482
canonical_id: b5cdc244-1c9f-4330-bd00-541234eb538f
wind_farm_name: Gruissan
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 30 MW
resolved_value: 30 MW
research_value: 30 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42608.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.qair.energy/realisations/eolmed/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Qair Eolmed project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.qair.energy/realisations/eolmed/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Qair, Vestas and Eolmed project pages consistently describe EolMed as a 30 MW pilot floating wind farm.


wind_farm_id: 6482
canonical_id: b5cdc244-1c9f-4330-bd00-541234eb538f
wind_farm_name: Gruissan
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE project page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.rte-france.com/projets/nos-projets/raccordement-du-parc-eolien-flottant-pilote-au-large-de-port-la-nouvelle-zone-de-gruissan

research_summary:
Open web sources confirm connection-voltage details but not a clearly stated MEC in MW. Eolmed project pages refer to a 33 kV export link, Prysmian refers to a 66 kV cable package, and RTE’s current project page refers to a 63 kV connection. Because these are connection-design references that vary by project stage/component, MEC in MW is not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6482
canonical_id: b5cdc244-1c9f-4330-bd00-541234eb538f
wind_farm_name: Gruissan
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas V164-10.0 MW
resolved_value: Vestas V164-10.0 MW
research_value: Vestas V164-10.0 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42609.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vestas press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.vestas.com/en/media/mwow-press-releases/2020/EolMed-partner-floating-offshore-wind-farm-France

research_summary:
Current project-specific sources explicitly tie the final EolMed configuration to three Vestas V164-10.0 MW turbines. Older permitting documents describe an earlier Senvion-based concept, but those should not override the later as-built/current configuration.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.vestas.com/en/media/mwow-press-releases/2020/EolMed-partner-floating-offshore-wind-farm-France


wind_farm_id: 6482
canonical_id: b5cdc244-1c9f-4330-bd00-541234eb538f
wind_farm_name: Gruissan
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas
resolved_value: Vestas
research_value: Vestas
resolved_fact_id: 42610.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://eolmed.qair.energy/le-projet/le-parc-pilote/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eolmed pilot farm page
source_of_record_url: https://eolmed.qair.energy/le-projet/le-parc-pilote/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Eolmed’s project page says the turbines are based on Vestas V-164 technology, and Vestas confirms it is the turbine supplier.


wind_farm_id: 6482
canonical_id: b5cdc244-1c9f-4330-bd00-541234eb538f
wind_farm_name: Gruissan
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 164 m
resolved_value: 164 m
research_value: 164 m
resolved_fact_id: 42612.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eolmed project update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://eolmed.qair.energy/alerte-medaille-dor-pour-la-filiere-francaise-de-leolien-en-mer-avec-la-reception-des-pales-dune-des-plus-grandes-eoliennes-jamais-installees-en-france/

research_summary:
Eolmed’s 30/08/2024 project update explicitly states “Diamètre du rotor : 164 mètres” for the project turbines; that is project-specific evidence for the final Vestas configuration.

source_of_record_url:
https://eolmed.qair.energy/alerte-medaille-dor-pour-la-filiere-francaise-de-leolien-en-mer-avec-la-reception-des-pales-dune-des-plus-grandes-eoliennes-jamais-installees-en-france/


wind_farm_id: 6482
canonical_id: b5cdc244-1c9f-4330-bd00-541234eb538f
wind_farm_name: Gruissan
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eolmed project update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://eolmed.qair.energy/alerte-medaille-dor-pour-la-filiere-francaise-de-leolien-en-mer-avec-la-reception-des-pales-dune-des-plus-grandes-eoliennes-jamais-installees-en-france/

research_summary:
Current project-specific web sources confirm overall turbine height and rotor diameter, but no clear project-specific hub height for the final Vestas 10 MW as-built configuration was found. Older Aude permitting material gives a 100 m rotor axis for an earlier Senvion 6.15 MW / 152 m concept, which should not be merged into the current Vestas build.


wind_farm_id: 6482
canonical_id: b5cdc244-1c9f-4330-bd00-541234eb538f
wind_farm_name: Gruissan
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 3
resolved_value: 3
research_value: 3
resolved_fact_id: 42613.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://eolmed.qair.energy/le-projet/le-parc-pilote/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eolmed pilot farm page
source_of_record_url: https://eolmed.qair.energy/le-projet/le-parc-pilote/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Qair/Eolmed, RTE and Vestas all confirm 3 turbines. This aligns with the non-web validation signal of 3 from EMODnet. Eolmed’s own project page explains the project was initially designed with 4 turbines, then reduced to 3 while maintaining 30 MW, which likely explains older references.


wind_farm_id: 6482
canonical_id: b5cdc244-1c9f-4330-bd00-541234eb538f
wind_farm_name: Gruissan
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Floating steel platforms / BW Ideol Damping Pool floating foundations
resolved_value: Floating steel platforms / BW Ideol Damping Pool floating foundations
research_value: Floating steel platforms / BW Ideol Damping Pool floating foundations
resolved_fact_id: 42614.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://eolmed.qair.energy/le-projet/le-parc-pilote/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eolmed pilot farm page
source_of_record_url: https://eolmed.qair.energy/le-projet/le-parc-pilote/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current project-specific sources describe steel floating platforms; OffshoreWind’s April 2026 report specifies BW Ideol’s Damping Pool floating foundations. Older project material referenced other concepts, but current sources support the steel floating configuration.


wind_farm_id: 6482
canonical_id: b5cdc244-1c9f-4330-bd00-541234eb538f
wind_farm_name: Gruissan
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 20/11/2019
resolved_value: 20/11/2019
research_value: 20/11/2019
resolved_fact_id: 42615.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Aude authorisations page
source_of_record_licence: public sector terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.aude.gouv.fr/Actions-de-l-Etat/Environnement-eau-foret-chasse-risques-naturels-technologiques/Plans-et-projets-d-amenagement-susceptibles-d-impacter-l-environnement/Eoliennes-flottantes/Projets-de-fermes-pilotes/Projet-EolMed/Autorisations-du-projet-EolMed

research_summary:
The Aude prefecture’s EolMed authorisations page and related project material support that the environmental authorisation and CUDPM for EolMed-Gruissan were approved on 20/11/2019.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.aude.gouv.fr/Actions-de-l-Etat/Environnement-eau-foret-chasse-risques-naturels-technologiques/Plans-et-projets-d-amenagement-susceptibles-d-impacter-l-environnement/Eoliennes-flottantes/Projets-de-fermes-pilotes/Projet-EolMed/Autorisations-du-projet-EolMed


wind_farm_id: 6482
canonical_id: b5cdc244-1c9f-4330-bd00-541234eb538f
wind_farm_name: Gruissan
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 09/05/2022
resolved_value: 09/05/2022
research_value: 09/05/2022
resolved_fact_id: 42616.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eolmed FID release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://eolmed.qair.energy/eolien-flottant-eolmed-annonce-aujourdhui-la-decision-finale-dinvestissement-du-projet-pilote-offshore-flottant-en-france-2/

research_summary:
The project company announced FID on 09/05/2022, corroborated by Qair and TotalEnergies communications around the same milestone.

source_of_record_url:
https://eolmed.qair.energy/eolien-flottant-eolmed-annonce-aujourdhui-la-decision-finale-dinvestissement-du-projet-pilote-offshore-flottant-en-france-2/


wind_farm_id: 6482
canonical_id: b5cdc244-1c9f-4330-bd00-541234eb538f
wind_farm_name: Gruissan
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 20/04/2026
resolved_value: 20/04/2026
research_value: 20/04/2026
resolved_fact_id: 42617.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://france.qair.energy/qair-met-sous-tension-son-projet-pilote-deoliennes-flottantes/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Qair France press release
source_of_record_url: https://france.qair.energy/qair-met-sous-tension-son-projet-pilote-deoliennes-flottantes/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Qair’s dated 20/04/2026 press release says the project was energised and is ready to inject its first MWh. Some secondary coverage suggests first electrons were injected shortly after, but the official dated energisation milestone is the strongest currently accessible project source.


wind_farm_id: 6482
canonical_id: b5cdc244-1c9f-4330-bd00-541234eb538f
wind_farm_name: Gruissan
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://france.qair.energy/qair-met-sous-tension-son-projet-pilote-deoliennes-flottantes/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Qair France press release
source_of_record_url: https://france.qair.energy/qair-met-sous-tension-son-projet-pilote-deoliennes-flottantes/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Qair’s general project page says completion was achieved at end 2025, but the dated 20/04/2026 release says Eolmed is in a technical testing phase after energisation. Because no clear source states full commissioning is complete, this remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6483
canonical_id: df0f7e9b-1213-40bc-9d91-41be8f4b758e
wind_farm_name: Leucate-Le Barcarès
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/facades-maritimes-en-france/facade-mediterranee/leucate
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/facades-maritimes-en-france/facade-mediterranee/leucate
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Leucate-Le Barcarès; official project name used on current project pages: Éoliennes Flottantes du Golfe du Lion (EFGL)

research_value:
Leucate-Le Barcarès; official project name used on current project pages: Éoliennes Flottantes du Golfe du Lion (EFGL)

research_summary:
The French state project page for Leucate-Le Barcarès explicitly labels the site “Éoliennes flottantes du Golfe du Lion”. RTE’s project documents also state that the zone “Leucate – Le Barcarès” is the project also called EFGL. Historic 2017 consultation material used the Leucate–Le Barcarès zone name and an earlier 4-turbine concept before later redesign.


wind_farm_id: 6483
canonical_id: df0f7e9b-1213-40bc-9d91-41be8f4b758e
wind_farm_name: Leucate-Le Barcarès
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 42741.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Banque des Territoires article
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: LEFGL / EFGL project company. Current owners: Ocean Winds and Banque des Territoires. Operator: Ocean Winds / EFGL project company

resolved_value:
Developer: LEFGL / EFGL project company. Current owners: Ocean Winds and Banque des Territoires. Operator: Ocean Winds / EFGL project company

citation_url:
https://www.banquedesterritoires.fr/eoliennes-flottantes-du-golfe-du-lion-zoom-sur-un-projet-pilote-pour-la-transition-energetique

research_summary:
Fresh ownership confirmation comes from Banque des Territoires, published 19/09/2025, stating EFGL is carried by company EFGL whose shareholders are Ocean Winds and Banque des Territoires. Ocean Winds’ own 31/07/2025 release says the EFGL project’s shareholders are Ocean Winds and Banque des Territoires. No public source found giving a reconciled current percentage split, so percentages remain Not confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.banquedesterritoires.fr/eoliennes-flottantes-du-golfe-du-lion-zoom-sur-un-projet-pilote-pour-la-transition-energetique


wind_farm_id: 6483
canonical_id: df0f7e9b-1213-40bc-9d91-41be8f4b758e
wind_farm_name: Leucate-Le Barcarès
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://assets.rte-france.com/prod/public/2020-06/Avis%20de%20concertation%20pr%C3%A9alable_0.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE consultation notice
source_of_record_url: https://assets.rte-france.com/prod/public/2020-06/Avis%20de%20concertation%20pr%C3%A9alable_0.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Originally developed by ENGIE, EDPR and Caisse des Dépôts group; now held by Ocean Winds and Banque des Territoires; ownership percentages Not confirmed

research_value:
Originally developed by ENGIE, EDPR and Caisse des Dépôts group; now held by Ocean Winds and Banque des Territoires; ownership percentages Not confirmed

research_summary:
The 2017 RTE consultation notice names ENGIE GREEN France, EDP Renewables Europe S.L. and Eolien en Mer Participations acting for the project company in formation. A later Ocean Winds page and Banque des Territoires page show the current shareholder presentation as Ocean Winds + Banque des Territoires. Freshest source date relied on for current structure: 19/09/2025.


wind_farm_id: 6483
canonical_id: df0f7e9b-1213-40bc-9d91-41be8f4b758e
wind_farm_name: Leucate-Le Barcarès
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Under Construction
resolved_value: Under Construction
research_value: Under Construction
resolved_fact_id: 42742.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.principlepower.com/news/efgl
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Principle Power project news
source_of_record_url: https://www.principlepower.com/news/efgl
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current official and quasi-official sources show the project is not yet operational: Banque des Territoires on 19/09/2025 says the 3 turbines have been put to sea but still need cable connection before service later that year; Principle Power on 04/09/2025 says final works and commissioning were still underway; the state page still shows projected commissioning in 2026. Closest Boundary Layer label is Under Construction.


wind_farm_id: 6483
canonical_id: df0f7e9b-1213-40bc-9d91-41be8f4b758e
wind_farm_name: Leucate-Le Barcarès
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 30 MW
resolved_value: 30 MW
research_value: 30 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42743.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.principlepower.com/projects/efgl
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Principle Power project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.principlepower.com/projects/efgl
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Multiple current project-specific sources agree on 3 × 10 MW = 30 MW. This differs from the older 2017 concept of 4 × 6 MW / 24 MW and also from the EMODnet fallback context; the later redesigned project appears to be the built scheme.


wind_farm_id: 6483
canonical_id: df0f7e9b-1213-40bc-9d91-41be8f4b758e
wind_farm_name: Leucate-Le Barcarès
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 30 MW export from 3 turbines; grid voltage 63 kV; exact named MEC value Not confirmed
resolved_value: 30 MW export from 3 turbines; grid voltage 63 kV; exact named MEC value Not confirmed
research_value: 30 MW export from 3 turbines; grid voltage 63 kV; exact named MEC value Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 42744.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE cable installation press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://assets.rte-france.com/prod/public/2024-05/2024-05-07-cp-installation-cable-sous-marin-efgl.pdf

research_summary:
RTE’s 06/05/2024 press release says the connection will evacuate the output of 3 turbines of 10 MW each. Public sources clearly support 30 MW project capacity and the 63 kV grid connection, but I did not find an openly accessible source explicitly labeling a separate MEC figure, so the exact MEC term remains Not confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://assets.rte-france.com/prod/public/2024-05/2024-05-07-cp-installation-cable-sous-marin-efgl.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6483
canonical_id: df0f7e9b-1213-40bc-9d91-41be8f4b758e
wind_farm_name: Leucate-Le Barcarès
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas V164-10.0 MW
resolved_value: Vestas V164-10.0 MW
research_value: Vestas V164-10.0 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42745.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vestas order release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.vestas.com/en/media/company-news/2022/vestas-secures-offshore-order-with-ocean-winds-for-floa-c3537414

research_summary:
Project-specific confirmation is strong: Vestas’ 31/03/2022 order release specifies three V164-10.0 MW wind turbines for EFGL, and Principle Power’s EFGL project page states each WindFloat foundation supports a Vestas V164-10 MW turbine.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.vestas.com/en/media/company-news/2022/vestas-secures-offshore-order-with-ocean-winds-for-floa-c3537414


wind_farm_id: 6483
canonical_id: df0f7e9b-1213-40bc-9d91-41be8f4b758e
wind_farm_name: Leucate-Le Barcarès
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas
resolved_value: Vestas
research_value: Vestas
resolved_fact_id: 42746.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vestas order release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.vestas.com/en/media/company-news/2022/vestas-secures-offshore-order-with-ocean-winds-for-floa-c3537414

research_summary:
Vestas is explicitly the supplier in the 31/03/2022 project order release, and Ocean Winds’ 10/06/2025 assembly release refers to the first 10 MW Vestas turbine mounted for EFGL.


wind_farm_id: 6483
canonical_id: df0f7e9b-1213-40bc-9d91-41be8f4b758e
wind_farm_name: Leucate-Le Barcarès
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 164 m
resolved_value: 164 m
research_value: 164 m
resolved_fact_id: 42748.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vestas V164-10 MW announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.vestas.com/en/media/mwow-press-releases/2018/mhi-vestas-launches-the-first-10-mw-wind-turbine-in-history

research_summary:
The project-specific model is confirmed as Vestas V164-10.0 MW. Vestas’ model launch page gives the model’s rotor diameter as 164 metres. Because the project-specific source identifies the exact turbine model, this rotor value is supportable for this project.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.vestas.com/en/media/mwow-press-releases/2018/mhi-vestas-launches-the-first-10-mw-wind-turbine-in-history


wind_farm_id: 6483
canonical_id: df0f7e9b-1213-40bc-9d91-41be8f4b758e
wind_farm_name: Leucate-Le Barcarès
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 104 m
resolved_value: 104 m
research_value: 104 m
resolved_fact_id: 42749.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.principlepower.com/news/efgl
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Principle Power project news
source_of_record_url: https://www.principlepower.com/news/efgl
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Use project-specific evidence only: Principle Power’s 04/09/2025 EFGL news states the nacelle was lifted to achieve an operating hub height of 104 meters above sea level. This is preferable to generic platform brochures.


wind_farm_id: 6483
canonical_id: df0f7e9b-1213-40bc-9d91-41be8f4b758e
wind_farm_name: Leucate-Le Barcarès
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 3
resolved_value: 3
research_value: 3
resolved_fact_id: 42750.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.principlepower.com/projects/efgl
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Principle Power project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.principlepower.com/projects/efgl
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current web sources consistently show 3 turbines. This differs from the non-web EMODnet validation hint of 0 and also differs from the 2017 early concept of 4 turbines. The most likely reason is that EMODnet is outdated for this pilot site and the project was redesigned from 4 × 6 MW to 3 × 10 MW before construction.


wind_farm_id: 6483
canonical_id: df0f7e9b-1213-40bc-9d91-41be8f4b758e
wind_farm_name: Leucate-Le Barcarès
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Floating semi-submersible WindFloat T foundations
resolved_value: Floating semi-submersible WindFloat T foundations
research_value: Floating semi-submersible WindFloat T foundations
resolved_fact_id: 42751.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vestas/MHI Vestas 2019 EFGL supplier release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.vestas.com/en/media/mwow-press-releases/2019/EFGL-Selects-V164-10-MW-turbines-from-MHI-Vestas-Offshore-Wind

research_summary:
Principle Power says EFGL consists of three WindFloat foundations and separately describes WindFloat T as a three-column semi-submersible platform. Project-specific 2019 supplier news also tied EFGL to the semi-submersible WindFloat platform.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.vestas.com/en/media/mwow-press-releases/2019/EFGL-Selects-V164-10-MW-turbines-from-MHI-Vestas-Offshore-Wind


wind_farm_id: 6483
canonical_id: df0f7e9b-1213-40bc-9d91-41be8f4b758e
wind_farm_name: Leucate-Le Barcarès
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 06/11/2019
resolved_value: 06/11/2019
research_value: 06/11/2019
resolved_fact_id: 42752.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Aude prefecture page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.aude.gouv.fr/index.php/Actions-de-l-Etat/Environnement/Plans-et-projets-d-amenagement-susceptibles-d-impacter-l-environnement/Eoliennes-flottantes/Projets-de-fermes-pilotes/Projet-EFGL-Eoliennes-Flottantes-du-Golfe-du-Lion/Avenant-n-1-a-la-convention-de-concession-d-utilisation-du-domaine-public-maritime-naturel-DPMn

research_summary:
Public administrative material shows the project’s maritime domain concession amendment refers back to an inter-prefectural approval dated 06/11/2019. RTE also reported in December 2020 that the project had obtained definitive administrative authorisations without appeal. I use 06/11/2019 as the best evidenced consent milestone visible in open sources.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.aude.gouv.fr/index.php/Actions-de-l-Etat/Environnement/Plans-et-projets-d-amenagement-susceptibles-d-impacter-l-environnement/Eoliennes-flottantes/Projets-de-fermes-pilotes/Projet-EFGL-Eoliennes-Flottantes-du-Golfe-du-Lion/Avenant-n-1-a-la-convention-de-concession-d-utilisation-du-domaine-public-maritime-naturel-DPMn


wind_farm_id: 6483
canonical_id: df0f7e9b-1213-40bc-9d91-41be8f4b758e
wind_farm_name: Leucate-Le Barcarès
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 27/01/2022
resolved_value: 27/01/2022
research_value: 27/01/2022
resolved_fact_id: 42753.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ocean Winds FID release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.oceanwinds.com/news/uncategorized/ocean-winds-reaches-final-investment-decisionon-french-efgl-project/

research_summary:
Ocean Winds explicitly announced FID on 27/01/2022. Vestas’ 31/03/2022 order release also says the order followed only weeks after EFGL’s FID.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.oceanwinds.com/news/uncategorized/ocean-winds-reaches-final-investment-decisionon-french-efgl-project/


wind_farm_id: 6483
canonical_id: df0f7e9b-1213-40bc-9d91-41be8f4b758e
wind_farm_name: Leucate-Le Barcarès
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/01/2026
resolved_value: 01/01/2026
research_value: 01/01/2026
resolved_fact_id: 42754.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.principlepower.com/projects/efgl
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Principle Power project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.principlepower.com/projects/efgl
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No source found confirming that power has already been exported. Principle Power’s project page lists First power: 2026; the state project page also gives projected commissioning in 2026. Per the normalization rule for year-only evidence, this is recorded as 01/01/2026 and should be treated as projected, not yet confirmed actual first generation.


wind_farm_id: 6483
canonical_id: df0f7e9b-1213-40bc-9d91-41be8f4b758e
wind_farm_name: Leucate-Le Barcarès
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/facades-maritimes-en-france/facade-mediterranee/leucate
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/facades-maritimes-en-france/facade-mediterranee/leucate
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Sources conflict on forecast timing: the state page shows projected commissioning in 2026, while Banque des Territoires and Principle Power in September 2025 described remaining cable/grid works and expected service around end-2025. I found no later openly accessible source confirming actual full commissioning, so this stays Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6484
canonical_id: d5743a25-e214-4e54-bcbd-8fd9abd979be
wind_farm_name: Saint-Brieuc
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.iberdrola.com/about-us/power/offshore-wind-energy/saint-brieuc-offshore-wind-farm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Iberdrola Saint-Brieuc project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.iberdrola.com/about-us/power/offshore-wind-energy/saint-brieuc-offshore-wind-farm
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Saint-Brieuc offshore wind farm; also referred to as Parc éolien en mer de Saint-Brieuc / parc éolien de la baie de Saint-Brieuc; project company Ailes Marines

research_value:
Saint-Brieuc offshore wind farm; also referred to as Parc éolien en mer de Saint-Brieuc / parc éolien de la baie de Saint-Brieuc; project company Ailes Marines

research_summary:
Identity is consistent across official project and owner sources: Iberdrola uses “Saint-Brieuc offshore wind farm”, while Ailes Marines and French public-information pages use “parc éolien en mer de Saint-Brieuc” / “baie de Saint-Brieuc”. No identity mismatch found.


wind_farm_id: 6484
canonical_id: d5743a25-e214-4e54-bcbd-8fd9abd979be
wind_farm_name: Saint-Brieuc
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Developer: Ailes Marines. Current owner: Iberdrola, 100%. Operator: Ailes Marines / Iberdrola
resolved_value: Developer: Ailes Marines. Current owner: Iberdrola, 100%. Operator: Ailes Marines / Iberdrola
research_value: Developer: Ailes Marines. Current owner: Iberdrola, 100%. Operator: Ailes Marines / Iberdrola
resolved_fact_id: 42520.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Iberdrola ownership press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.iberdrola.com/press-room/news/detail/iberdrola-increases-offshore-wind-ambition-france-acquiring-100-capital-ailes-marines

research_summary:
Iberdrola’s 09/03/2020 release confirms it took 100% ownership of Ailes Marines. Iberdrola’s 01/02/2025 O&M-base release confirms Iberdrola is running the operating phase at Saint-Brieuc. This supports the existing value without relying on the blocked Ailes Marines URL.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.iberdrola.com/press-room/news/detail/iberdrola-increases-offshore-wind-ambition-france-acquiring-100-capital-ailes-marines


wind_farm_id: 6484
canonical_id: d5743a25-e214-4e54-bcbd-8fd9abd979be
wind_farm_name: Saint-Brieuc
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Iberdrola ownership press release
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Originally Ailes Marines consortium; Iberdrola acquired 100% on 09/03/2020; current ownership 100% Iberdrola

research_value:
Originally Ailes Marines consortium; Iberdrola acquired 100% on 09/03/2020; current ownership 100% Iberdrola

citation_url:
https://www.iberdrola.com/documents/20125/647446/ni_2020-03-09_iberdrola_acquires_30__of_saint-bri.pdf

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on for current ownership is 01/02/2025 from Iberdrola’s operating-phase update; ownership history itself is directly supported by Iberdrola’s 09/03/2020 press release stating it took 100% ownership of Ailes Marines. Earlier third-party reports referenced minority partners before that buyout, but the current structure reconciles fully to 100% Iberdrola.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.iberdrola.com/documents/20125/647446/ni_2020-03-09_iberdrola_acquires_30__of_saint-bri.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6484
canonical_id: d5743a25-e214-4e54-bcbd-8fd9abd979be
wind_farm_name: Saint-Brieuc
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 42521.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Iberdrola commissioning release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.iberdrola.com/press-room/news/detail/iberdrola-comissions-saint-brieuc-the-second-offshore-wind-farm-in-france-and-the-first-in-britanny

research_summary:
Iberdrola states Saint-Brieuc became the second fully operational offshore wind farm in France and that as of 28th May 2024, all wind turbines are operational. The prefecture page separately regulates activities in the phase d’exploitation.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.iberdrola.com/press-room/news/detail/iberdrola-comissions-saint-brieuc-the-second-offshore-wind-farm-in-france-and-the-first-in-britanny


wind_farm_id: 6484
canonical_id: d5743a25-e214-4e54-bcbd-8fd9abd979be
wind_farm_name: Saint-Brieuc
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 496 MW
resolved_value: 496 MW
research_value: 496 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42522.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.iberdrola.com/about-us/power/offshore-wind-energy/saint-brieuc-offshore-wind-farm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Iberdrola Saint-Brieuc project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.iberdrola.com/about-us/power/offshore-wind-energy/saint-brieuc-offshore-wind-farm
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Capacity is consistently stated as 496 MW by Iberdrola, Ailes Marines, and French public-information pages. This aligns with the database context.


wind_farm_id: 6484
canonical_id: d5743a25-e214-4e54-bcbd-8fd9abd979be
wind_farm_name: Saint-Brieuc
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 496 MW
resolved_value: 496 MW
research_value: 496 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42523.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE network development document
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://assets.rte-france.com/prod/public/2020-07/SDDR%202019%20Chapitre%2006%20-%20Le%20r%C3%A9seau%20en%20mer.pdf

research_summary:
No source reviewed explicitly labels a separate MEC figure. The grid connection sources and project sources support a 496 MW export-linked project, so 496 MW is the best-supported value; this appears to equal gross installed capacity here.

source_of_record_url:
https://assets.rte-france.com/prod/public/2020-07/SDDR%202019%20Chapitre%2006%20-%20Le%20r%C3%A9seau%20en%20mer.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6484
canonical_id: d5743a25-e214-4e54-bcbd-8fd9abd979be
wind_farm_name: Saint-Brieuc
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: SG 8.0-167 DD
resolved_value: SG 8.0-167 DD
research_value: SG 8.0-167 DD
resolved_fact_id: 42524.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa project press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/press-releases/siemens-gamesa-to-supply-newest-8-mw-direct-drive-offshore-turbine-to-500-mw.html

research_summary:
Project-specific web sources do confirm the model: Siemens Gamesa’s project-specific supply release names SG 8.0-167 DD, and Ailes Marines’ July 2024 release also names “Siemens Gamesa SG 8.0-167 DD”. This matches the linked EuroWindWakes fallback.


wind_farm_id: 6484
canonical_id: d5743a25-e214-4e54-bcbd-8fd9abd979be
wind_farm_name: Saint-Brieuc
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 8
resolved_value: 8
research_value: 8 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9351.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Iberdrola Saint-Brieuc project page
research_source_type: owner / project page
research_source_url: https://www.iberdrola.com/about-us/power/offshore-wind-energy/saint-brieuc-offshore-wind-farm
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Multiple project-specific sources state 62 turbines of 8 MW each. This matches the linked EuroWindWakes fallback.


wind_farm_id: 6484
canonical_id: d5743a25-e214-4e54-bcbd-8fd9abd979be
wind_farm_name: Saint-Brieuc
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 167
resolved_value: 167
research_value: 167 m
resolved_fact_id: 9506.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Siemens Gamesa project press release
research_source_type: OEM press release
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Siemens Gamesa’s Saint-Brieuc project release explicitly states SG 8.0-167 DD and “rotor diameter of 167 meters”. This matches the linked EuroWindWakes fallback. Strong second project-specific confirmation on rotor diameter was harder to locate without using generic turbine pages, so one authoritative project-specific source plus dataset-aligned context was used.


wind_farm_id: 6484
canonical_id: d5743a25-e214-4e54-bcbd-8fd9abd979be
wind_farm_name: Saint-Brieuc
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 120
resolved_value: 120
research_value: 120 m
resolved_fact_id: 9661.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific accessible web sources reviewed did not clearly and explicitly state hub height for Saint-Brieuc. Per the required rule, the linked EuroWindWakes 2025 turbine row was used as fallback: 120 m. Iberdrola’s page gives overall turbine height (209 m), but that is not hub height and was not used to derive it.


wind_farm_id: 6484
canonical_id: d5743a25-e214-4e54-bcbd-8fd9abd979be
wind_farm_name: Saint-Brieuc
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 62
resolved_value: 62
research_value: 62
resolved_fact_id: 48134.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 62 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Iberdrola Saint-Brieuc project page
research_source_type: owner / project page
research_source_url: https://www.iberdrola.com/about-us/power/offshore-wind-energy/saint-brieuc-offshore-wind-farm
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Web sources consistently state 62 turbines. This aligns with all non-web validation signals provided: EMODnet hint 62 and EuroWindWakes linked count 62.


wind_farm_id: 6484
canonical_id: d5743a25-e214-4e54-bcbd-8fd9abd979be
wind_farm_name: Saint-Brieuc
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Jacket foundations
resolved_value: Jacket foundations
research_value: Jacket foundations
resolved_fact_id: 42530.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Iberdrola turbine installation update
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.iberdrola.com/documents/20125/3752320/231219-all-wind-turbines-at-iberdrolas-saint-brieuc-offshore-wind-farm-in-france-have-been-installed.pdf

research_summary:
Multiple project-specific and supplier/contractor sources state jacket foundations for the turbines.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.iberdrola.com/documents/20125/3752320/231219-all-wind-turbines-at-iberdrolas-saint-brieuc-offshore-wind-farm-in-france-have-been-installed.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6484
canonical_id: d5743a25-e214-4e54-bcbd-8fd9abd979be
wind_farm_name: Saint-Brieuc
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 18/04/2017
resolved_value: 18/04/2017
research_value: 18/04/2017
resolved_fact_id: 42531.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Côtes-d'Armor authorisations overview
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.cotes-darmor.gouv.fr/Actions-de-l-Etat/Environnement-Biodiversite-Foret-et-transition-energetique/Energie/Eolien-en-mer/Les-autorisations

research_summary:
Repaired using accessible prefecture pages. The Côtes-d’Armor authorisations page states that Ailes Marines and RTE obtained several authorisations on 18 April 2017, and the Ailes Marines subpage lists downloadable authorisation documents dated 18 avril 2017. This supports retaining the existing consent date.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.cotes-darmor.gouv.fr/Actions-de-l-Etat/Environnement-Biodiversite-Foret-et-transition-energetique/Energie/Eolien-en-mer/Les-autorisations


wind_farm_id: 6484
canonical_id: d5743a25-e214-4e54-bcbd-8fd9abd979be
wind_farm_name: Saint-Brieuc
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 09/03/2020
resolved_value: 09/03/2020
research_value: 09/03/2020
resolved_fact_id: 42532.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Iberdrola ownership press release
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.iberdrola.com/documents/20125/647446/ni_2020-03-09_iberdrola_acquires_30__of_saint-bri.pdf

research_summary:
A discrete “FID” label was not clearly published on accessible official pages reviewed. The best-supported invest/commit milestone is Iberdrola’s 09/03/2020 acquisition of 100% of Ailes Marines, after which project sources describe Iberdrola as fully financing the €2.4bn project and construction starting in 2021. Chosen as closest evidenced FID-equivalent date and noted as nuance.


wind_farm_id: 6484
canonical_id: d5743a25-e214-4e54-bcbd-8fd9abd979be
wind_farm_name: Saint-Brieuc
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 05/07/2023
resolved_value: 05/07/2023
research_value: 05/07/2023
resolved_fact_id: 42533.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Iberdrola first-power release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.iberdrola.com/press-room/news/detail/first-power-from-iberdrolas-saint-brieuc-offshore-wind-farm-in-france

research_summary:
Iberdrola explicitly states initial electricity was connected to the grid on 05/07/2023; subsequent sources refer to production beginning in 2023.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.iberdrola.com/press-room/news/detail/first-power-from-iberdrolas-saint-brieuc-offshore-wind-farm-in-france


wind_farm_id: 6484
canonical_id: d5743a25-e214-4e54-bcbd-8fd9abd979be
wind_farm_name: Saint-Brieuc
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2024-05-01
resolved_value: 2024-05-01
research_value: 28/05/2024
resolved_fact_id: 9816.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Iberdrola commissioning release
research_source_type: owner press release
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Repaired using accessible Iberdrola sources. Iberdrola’s 28/05/2024 commissioning release states that as of 28th May 2024, all wind turbines are operational and that output from the 62 turbines is feeding the national grid. Iberdrola’s project page also says the company commissioned Saint-Brieuc in May 2024.

research_source_url:
https://www.iberdrola.com/press-room/news/detail/iberdrola-comissions-saint-brieuc-the-second-offshore-wind-farm-in-france-and-the-first-in-britanny


wind_farm_id: 6487
canonical_id: d0fc833b-e4be-4f83-b68a-5a74cf769add
wind_farm_name: Golfe du Lion Ouest
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Golfe du Lion Ouest (GLO)
research_value: Golfe du Lion Ouest (GLO)
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-med
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer – concertation continue Méditerranée
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-med
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current French state planning sources use Golfe du Lion Ouest (GLO) for a west Gulf of Lion floating offshore wind priority zone/project at horizon 2050. This is distinct from the built/pilot EFGL project near Leucate/Le Barcarès.


wind_farm_id: 6487
canonical_id: d0fc833b-e4be-4f83-b68a-5a74cf769add
wind_farm_name: Golfe du Lion Ouest
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 43322.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-med
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer – concertation continue Méditerranée
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-med
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: French State / DGEC-led pre-tender planning; Current owner(s): Not confirmed; Equity partners and ownership percentages: Not confirmed; Operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: French State / DGEC-led pre-tender planning; Current owner(s): Not confirmed; Equity partners and ownership percentages: Not confirmed; Operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
Freshest source used: Eoliennes en mer page dated 20/03/2025. The project is still described as a state-defined priority zone whose contours will be set through further studies and consultation; no project company, awarded developer, operator, or equity split was confirmed in accessible current sources.


wind_farm_id: 6487
canonical_id: d0fc833b-e4be-4f83-b68a-5a74cf769add
wind_farm_name: Golfe du Lion Ouest
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-med
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer – concertation continue Méditerranée
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-med
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Freshest source relied on: 20/03/2025. No awarded private developer or ownership transfer history was confirmed for the exact target identity; current evidence supports a planning-zone identity rather than an awarded project company.


wind_farm_id: 6487
canonical_id: d0fc833b-e4be-4f83-b68a-5a74cf769add
wind_farm_name: Golfe du Lion Ouest
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Concept
resolved_value: Concept
research_value: Concept
resolved_fact_id: 43323.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-med
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer – concertation continue Méditerranée
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-med
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Best-fit Boundary Layer status is Concept. Current sources show GLO as a priority zone at horizon 2050 whose contours remain to be defined through future studies and consultation. I rejected Development Zone / lease area because no lease/award to a developer was confirmed, and rejected Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning and later stages because no awarded rights, consent application, consent, FID, or construction were found.


wind_farm_id: 6487
canonical_id: d0fc833b-e4be-4f83-b68a-5a74cf769add
wind_farm_name: Golfe du Lion Ouest
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1,100 MW (planned, indicative)
resolved_value: 1,100 MW (planned, indicative)
research_value: 1,100 MW (planned, indicative)
resolved_fact_id: 43324.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-med
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer – concertation continue Méditerranée
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-med
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Two independent state sources describe GLO as a project/zone of “environ 1,1 GW”. This differs from the database validation context value of 250 MW; the likely reason is that the database row is outdated or reflects an older/internal concept geometry, while newer public planning documents after the 2023/2024 debate describe the current priority-zone scale as about 1.1 GW.


wind_farm_id: 6487
canonical_id: d0fc833b-e4be-4f83-b68a-5a74cf769add
wind_farm_name: Golfe du Lion Ouest
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-med
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer – concertation continue Méditerranée
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-med
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific MEC/export-capacity figure was found in accessible official sources for the exact target identity. Current publications discuss indicative generation capacity and zone planning, not a confirmed grid export rating.


wind_farm_id: 6487
canonical_id: d0fc833b-e4be-4f83-b68a-5a74cf769add
wind_farm_name: Golfe du Lion Ouest
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-med
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer – concertation continue Méditerranée
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-med
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine row was provided, and current web sources for the exact target identity do not confirm a site-specific turbine model. Per the sourcing rules, this remains Not confirmed and is not inferred from other Gulf of Lion projects.


wind_farm_id: 6487
canonical_id: d0fc833b-e4be-4f83-b68a-5a74cf769add
wind_farm_name: Golfe du Lion Ouest
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/etudes-techniques
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer – études techniques
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/etudes-techniques
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific OEM was confirmed for Golfe du Lion Ouest. Sources only establish an early planning zone/project, not selected turbines or supplier contracts.


wind_farm_id: 6487
canonical_id: d0fc833b-e4be-4f83-b68a-5a74cf769add
wind_farm_name: Golfe du Lion Ouest
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-med
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer – concertation continue Méditerranée
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-med
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific turbine rating was confirmed for the exact target identity, and no linked higher-priority turbine dataset value was provided.


wind_farm_id: 6487
canonical_id: d0fc833b-e4be-4f83-b68a-5a74cf769add
wind_farm_name: Golfe du Lion Ouest
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/etudes-techniques
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer – études techniques
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/etudes-techniques
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Not confirmed from project-specific sources; no turbine selection has been publicly confirmed for this exact project identity.


wind_farm_id: 6487
canonical_id: d0fc833b-e4be-4f83-b68a-5a74cf769add
wind_farm_name: Golfe du Lion Ouest
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/etudes-techniques
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer – études techniques
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/etudes-techniques
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Not confirmed from project-specific sources; no linked EuroWindWakes fallback value was supplied in the task context, so the field remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6487
canonical_id: d0fc833b-e4be-4f83-b68a-5a74cf769add
wind_farm_name: Golfe du Lion Ouest
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 8632.0
resolved_source_type: emodnet
resolved_source_name: EMODnet Human Activities
resolved_source_detail: EMODnet Jan 2026
citation_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMODnet Human Activities
source_of_record_type: public data portal
source_of_record_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
source_of_record_licence: Free and open public portal
research_source_name: Eoliennes en mer – concertation continue Méditerranée
research_source_type: official project/regulator webpage
research_source_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-med
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
No official current source states a turbine count for GLO. This does, however, align with the non-web validation signals showing 0 turbines, which is consistent with the project being an unawarded concept/priority zone rather than a defined wind farm layout.


wind_farm_id: 6487
canonical_id: d0fc833b-e4be-4f83-b68a-5a74cf769add
wind_farm_name: Golfe du Lion Ouest
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Golfe du Lion Ouest geotechnical site investigation report
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/sites/eoliennesenmer/files/fichiers/2025/12/F254727-REP-001%20Golfe%20du%20Lion%20Geotechnical%20Site%20Investigation%20Ouest%20%28Z3%29_i04_compressed.pdf

research_summary:
The zone is discussed in the context of floating offshore wind planning, and geotechnical work has been commissioned, but no project-specific confirmed foundation/substructure type for GLO was found in the accessible sources reviewed.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/sites/eoliennesenmer/files/fichiers/2025/12/F254727-REP-001%20Golfe%20du%20Lion%20Geotechnical%20Site%20Investigation%20Ouest%20%28Z3%29_i04_compressed.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6487
canonical_id: d0fc833b-e4be-4f83-b68a-5a74cf769add
wind_farm_name: Golfe du Lion Ouest
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-med
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer – concertation continue Méditerranée
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-med
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific consent or permit approval date was confirmed for GLO. The exact target remains at pre-consent planning stage.


wind_farm_id: 6487
canonical_id: d0fc833b-e4be-4f83-b68a-5a74cf769add
wind_farm_name: Golfe du Lion Ouest
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-med
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer – concertation continue Méditerranée
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-med
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No FID has been confirmed for the exact target identity; current sources still place GLO in long-horizon pre-definition planning.


wind_farm_id: 6487
canonical_id: d0fc833b-e4be-4f83-b68a-5a74cf769add
wind_farm_name: Golfe du Lion Ouest
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-med
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer – concertation continue Méditerranée
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-med
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No first-power milestone is available because the project has not reached award, consent, or construction.


wind_farm_id: 6487
canonical_id: d0fc833b-e4be-4f83-b68a-5a74cf769add
wind_farm_name: Golfe du Lion Ouest
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-med
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer – concertation continue Méditerranée
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-med
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No commissioning date has been confirmed for GLO. Sources describe it as a 2050-horizon priority zone rather than a scheduled awarded project.


wind_farm_id: 6490
canonical_id: b0c3518b-f4ce-4abf-8fee-46ed76a27b7a
wind_farm_name: Centre-Manche 2
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer project page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Centre Manche 2; alternative references: Centre-Manche 2, AO8, and the award-stage project company originally referenced as Cotentin Energies Marines, later Centre Manche Énergies

research_value:
Centre Manche 2; alternative references: Centre-Manche 2, AO8, and the award-stage project company originally referenced as Cotentin Energies Marines, later Centre Manche Énergies

citation_url:
https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/facades-maritimes-en-france/facade-manche-mer-du-nord/projet-centre-manche/centre-manche-2

research_summary:
The French state project page uses “Centre Manche 2”; RTE commonly uses “Centre-Manche 2” with a hyphen. The 24/09/2025 state press release says the AO8 winner is Cotentin Energies Marines, while the current project website says the dedicated company is now Centre Manche Énergies.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/facades-maritimes-en-france/facade-manche-mer-du-nord/projet-centre-manche/centre-manche-2


wind_farm_id: 6490
canonical_id: b0c3518b-f4ce-4abf-8fee-46ed76a27b7a
wind_farm_name: Centre-Manche 2
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 42500.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://centre-manche-energies.fr/fr/le-porteur-du-projet
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Centre Manche Énergies - Le porteur du projet
source_of_record_url: https://centre-manche-energies.fr/fr/le-porteur-du-projet
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer / project company: Centre Manche Énergies; current owner: TotalEnergies 100%; operator: TotalEnergies; RWE: former award-stage consortium partner, not listed as current owner on the live project company page

resolved_value:
Developer / project company: Centre Manche Énergies; current owner: TotalEnergies 100%; operator: TotalEnergies; RWE: former award-stage consortium partner, not listed as current owner on the live project company page

research_summary:
Freshest ownership evidence used: the live Centre Manche Énergies project-company page states the SPV “est détenue à 100% par TotalEnergies”; the project homepage says “TotalEnergies sera l’opérateur du projet”. This is newer than the 24/09/2025 award announcement that named a TotalEnergies + RWE consortium.


wind_farm_id: 6490
canonical_id: b0c3518b-f4ce-4abf-8fee-46ed76a27b7a
wind_farm_name: Centre-Manche 2
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: French state press release 24/09/2025
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
24/09/2025: awarded to consortium Cotentin Energies Marines (TotalEnergies + RWE); current live project-company page: Centre Manche Énergies is 100% owned by TotalEnergies

research_value:
24/09/2025: awarded to consortium Cotentin Energies Marines (TotalEnergies + RWE); current live project-company page: Centre Manche Énergies is 100% owned by TotalEnergies

citation_url:
https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/sites/eoliennesenmer/files/inline-files/891_-_CP_-_Designation_du_laureat_de_lappel_doffres_eolien_en_mer_%C3%82_Centre_Manche_2_%C3%82_AO8_et_infructuosite_de_lappel_doffres_%C3%82_Oleron_1_%C3%82_AO7.pdf

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on for history: the award press release dated 24/09/2025 confirms the original winning consortium. The current project-company page, crawled recently and presented as the live sponsor site, shows a later ownership position with 100% TotalEnergies. This indicates a post-award ownership change or partner exit; I did not find an openly accessible official transfer notice spelling out the exact transaction date.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/sites/eoliennesenmer/files/inline-files/891_-_CP_-_Designation_du_laureat_de_lappel_doffres_eolien_en_mer_%C3%82_Centre_Manche_2_%C3%82_AO8_et_infructuosite_de_lappel_doffres_%C3%82_Oleron_1_%C3%82_AO7.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6490
canonical_id: b0c3518b-f4ce-4abf-8fee-46ed76a27b7a
wind_farm_name: Centre-Manche 2
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
resolved_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
research_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
resolved_fact_id: 42501.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://centre-manche-energies.fr/fr
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Centre Manche Énergies homepage
source_of_record_url: https://centre-manche-energies.fr/fr
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project has been awarded and has a named operator/developer, with continued studies and a stated plan to take FID in early 2029; it is beyond lease award but before FID. It is not clear if full planning permission is granted as such it is set to lease awarded, pre planning


wind_farm_id: 6490
canonical_id: b0c3518b-f4ce-4abf-8fee-46ed76a27b7a
wind_farm_name: Centre-Manche 2
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1,500 MW
resolved_value: 1,500 MW
research_value: 1,500 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42502.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: French state press release 24/09/2025
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/sites/eoliennesenmer/files/inline-files/891_-_CP_-_Designation_du_laureat_de_lappel_doffres_eolien_en_mer_%C3%82_Centre_Manche_2_%C3%82_AO8_et_infructuosite_de_lappel_doffres_%C3%82_Oleron_1_%C3%82_AO7.pdf

research_summary:
Consistently described by state, developer, and CRE sources as a 1.5 GW / 1,500 MW fixed-bottom offshore wind project.


wind_farm_id: 6490
canonical_id: b0c3518b-f4ce-4abf-8fee-46ed76a27b7a
wind_farm_name: Centre-Manche 2
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1,250 MW
resolved_value: 1,250 MW
research_value: 1,250 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42503.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.rte-france.com/actualites/centre-manche-2-historique-projet
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE project history
source_of_record_url: https://www.rte-france.com/actualites/centre-manche-2-historique-projet
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The best explicit web evidence is for grid export/injection capacity rather than a page labeled “MEC”. RTE and the state’s post-consultation report state a new HVDC connection of 1,250 MW for Centre Manche 2, while CRE says the project is connected via two offshore substations totaling 1,250 MW + 200 MW shared capacity, but one is partly shared with Centre-Manche 1. For a single explicit project export figure, 1,250 MW is the clearest directly stated value.


wind_farm_id: 6490
canonical_id: b0c3518b-f4ce-4abf-8fee-46ed76a27b7a
wind_farm_name: Centre-Manche 2
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://centre-manche-energies.fr/fr
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Centre Manche Énergies homepage
source_of_record_url: https://centre-manche-energies.fr/fr
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I found no current authoritative source explicitly tying a specific turbine model to Centre-Manche 2. The project remains pre-FID and turbine selection was still constrained during the tender phase, but no awarded model is confirmed. No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided, so I have left this as Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6490
canonical_id: b0c3518b-f4ce-4abf-8fee-46ed76a27b7a
wind_farm_name: Centre-Manche 2
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://centre-manche-energies.fr/fr
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Centre Manche Énergies homepage
source_of_record_url: https://centre-manche-energies.fr/fr
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No authoritative project-specific source found that names the OEM for Centre-Manche 2. Tender-stage documents discuss constraints on turbine choice but do not identify a final supplier.


wind_farm_id: 6490
canonical_id: b0c3518b-f4ce-4abf-8fee-46ed76a27b7a
wind_farm_name: Centre-Manche 2
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer Q&A
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/facades-maritimes-en-france/facade-manche-mer-du-nord/projet-centre-manche-2/concertation-prealable/avis-questions

research_summary:
No current project-specific source confirms the selected turbine rating. Consultation-era material gave only illustrative scenarios such as 100 × 15 MW, 125 × 12 MW, or 75 × 20 MW, which are not final specifications.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/facades-maritimes-en-france/facade-manche-mer-du-nord/projet-centre-manche-2/concertation-prealable/avis-questions


