# wind_farm_dossier_fields

wind_farm_id: 6408
canonical_id: 5a0e6ac0-f4fe-4548-8de7-797544d49e85
wind_farm_name: Vesterhav Nord
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Vesterhav Nord
research_value: Vesterhav Nord
citation_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/vesterhav-nord/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall power plant page
source_of_record_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/vesterhav-nord/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific official pages use the name Vesterhav Nord. Danish Energy Agency pages often discuss it together with sister project Vesterhav Syd under the nearshore tender, so phase/name ambiguity is mainly between the standalone project and the combined 350 MW tender package.


wind_farm_id: 6408
canonical_id: 5a0e6ac0-f4fe-4548-8de7-797544d49e85
wind_farm_name: Vesterhav Nord
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Developer: Vattenfall. Current owner(s): Vattenfall 92%, Danish co-owners 8%. Operator: Vattenfall
resolved_value: Developer: Vattenfall. Current owner(s): Vattenfall 92%, Danish co-owners 8%. Operator: Vattenfall
research_value: Developer: Vattenfall. Current owner(s): Vattenfall 92%, Danish co-owners 8%. Operator: Vattenfall
resolved_fact_id: 40716.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/vesterhav-nord/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall power plant page
source_of_record_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/vesterhav-nord/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
VattenfallΓÇÖs project page states "Vattenfall ownership share 92 %", implying minority co-ownership rather than 100% ownership. The freshest dated authoritative source relied on for current ownership/status context is the 2024 annual report of Vattenfall Vindkraft Vesterhav Nord Holding A/S, while VattenfallΓÇÖs live plant page provides the only explicit accessible ownership-share figure found. A fully reconciled official public page naming all 8% co-owners was not found.


wind_farm_id: 6408
canonical_id: 5a0e6ac0-f4fe-4548-8de7-797544d49e85
wind_farm_name: Vesterhav Nord
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency project page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Vattenfall won the tender in 2016; project company established 19/12/2016; by the time of operation Vattenfall held 92% and local minority co-owners held 8%

research_value:
Vattenfall won the tender in 2016; project company established 19/12/2016; by the time of operation Vattenfall held 92% and local minority co-owners held 8%

citation_url:
https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/ongoing-offshore-wind-tenders/vesterhav-syd-and-vesterhav-nord-offshore-wind-farms

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on is the 2024 annual report for the project holding company. DEA confirms the concession agreements were signed on 22/12/2016. Current accessible web evidence supports Vattenfall as controlling owner, but does not openly identify all minority equity names/percentages beyond VattenfallΓÇÖs 92% share.


wind_farm_id: 6408
canonical_id: 5a0e6ac0-f4fe-4548-8de7-797544d49e85
wind_farm_name: Vesterhav Nord
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 40717.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall Vindkraft Vesterhav Nord Holding A/S annual report 2024
source_of_record_licence: public filing terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://regnskaber.cvrapi.dk/11427283/amNsb3VkczovLzAzL2FlLzc5LzcxLzE0LzJiMzgtNGRhMy1iZmYwLWZlZjNjZjk5MTlhNQ.pdf

research_summary:
VattenfallΓÇÖs project page says the wind farm "was commissioned in 2024" and marks status "In Operation". The 2024 annual report says the wind farm "went into full operation during 1st quarter of 2024." This is more current than older DEA construction-stage pages.

source_of_record_url:
https://regnskaber.cvrapi.dk/11427283/amNsb3VkczovLzAzL2FlLzc5LzcxLzE0LzJiMzgtNGRhMy1iZmYwLWZlZjNjZjk5MTlhNQ.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6408
canonical_id: 5a0e6ac0-f4fe-4548-8de7-797544d49e85
wind_farm_name: Vesterhav Nord
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 176 MW
resolved_value: 176 MW
research_value: 176 MW
resolved_fact_id: 40718.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/vesterhav-nord/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall power plant page
source_of_record_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/vesterhav-nord/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Vattenfall and Siemens Gamesa both give the project-specific as-built/ordered capacity as 176 MW. Some Danish regulator/news pages round this to 180 MW because 21 ├ù 8.4 MW = 176.4 MW; 176 MW is the more precise project figure.


wind_farm_id: 6408
canonical_id: 5a0e6ac0-f4fe-4548-8de7-797544d49e85
wind_farm_name: Vesterhav Nord
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency project page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Publicly accessible official pages reviewed clearly confirm gross/project capacity, but I did not find an openly accessible project-specific source explicitly stating MEC/export capacity for Vesterhav Nord alone. To avoid confusing gross capacity with export capacity, this remains unconfirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6408
canonical_id: 5a0e6ac0-f4fe-4548-8de7-797544d49e85
wind_farm_name: Vesterhav Nord
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: SG 8.0-167 DD
resolved_value: SG 8.0-167 DD
research_value: SG 8.0-167 DD
resolved_fact_id: 40719.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa order announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/press-releases/211215-siemens-gamesa-press-release-vesterhav-projects-firm-order.html

research_summary:
Siemens GamesaΓÇÖs project-specific order announcement explicitly names SG 8.0-167 DD for Vesterhav Nord. Project-specific web sources then describe each turbine as 8.4 MW, indicating flex-rating within the SG 8.0-167 DD platform.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/press-releases/211215-siemens-gamesa-press-release-vesterhav-projects-firm-order.html


wind_farm_id: 6408
canonical_id: 5a0e6ac0-f4fe-4548-8de7-797544d49e85
wind_farm_name: Vesterhav Nord
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 8
resolved_value: 8
research_value: 8.4 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9327.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Siemens Gamesa order announcement
research_source_type: OEM press release
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Siemens GamesaΓÇÖs project-specific release says the project uses SG 8.0-167 DD turbines and that each turbine has 8.4 MW capacity.

research_source_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/press-releases/211215-siemens-gamesa-press-release-vesterhav-projects-firm-order.html


wind_farm_id: 6408
canonical_id: 5a0e6ac0-f4fe-4548-8de7-797544d49e85
wind_farm_name: Vesterhav Nord
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 109
resolved_value: 109
research_value: 109 m
resolved_fact_id: 9637.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources reviewed did not clearly state hub height for Vesterhav Nord. Per the required fallback rule, the linked EuroWindWakes 2025 project turbine metadata value of 109 m is used.


wind_farm_id: 6408
canonical_id: 5a0e6ac0-f4fe-4548-8de7-797544d49e85
wind_farm_name: Vesterhav Nord
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 21
resolved_value: 21
research_value: 21
resolved_fact_id: 40724.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/vesterhav-nord/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall power plant page
source_of_record_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/vesterhav-nord/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Vattenfall and Siemens Gamesa both state 21 turbines for Vesterhav Nord. This aligns with the non-web validation signals provided (EMODnet hint/database winner candidate: 21).


wind_farm_id: 6408
canonical_id: 5a0e6ac0-f4fe-4548-8de7-797544d49e85
wind_farm_name: Vesterhav Nord
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile
resolved_value: Monopile
research_value: Monopile
resolved_fact_id: 40725.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall construction update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/dk/nyheder-og-presse/nyheder/2023/vattenfall-afslutter-fundamenter-til-vesterhav-syd--nu-begynder-arbejdet-i-nord

research_summary:
VattenfallΓÇÖs 2023 construction update for Vesterhav Nord says work would begin installing "21 monop├ªle" (21 monopiles). Supporting industry reporting on the same project also refers to monopiles and transition pieces.

source_of_record_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/dk/nyheder-og-presse/nyheder/2023/vattenfall-afslutter-fundamenter-til-vesterhav-syd--nu-begynder-arbejdet-i-nord


wind_farm_id: 6408
canonical_id: 5a0e6ac0-f4fe-4548-8de7-797544d49e85
wind_farm_name: Vesterhav Nord
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 22/12/2016
resolved_value: 22/12/2016
research_value: 22/12/2016
resolved_fact_id: 40726.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/presse/kontrakter-succesfulde-havmoelleudbud-er-nu-underskrevet
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/presse/kontrakter-succesfulde-havmoelleudbud-er-nu-underskrevet
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
An accessible Danish Energy Agency page confirms that the concession agreements for the nearshore projects, including Vesterhav Nord, were signed on 22 December 2016. The previously cited electricity-production permit PDF was blocked in source-of-record verification, so the consent-date source-of-record is repaired to the accessible DEA page.


wind_farm_id: 6408
canonical_id: 5a0e6ac0-f4fe-4548-8de7-797544d49e85
wind_farm_name: Vesterhav Nord
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 15/12/2021
resolved_value: 15/12/2021
research_value: 15/12/2021
resolved_fact_id: 40727.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall FID press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/press-and-media/pressreleases/2021/vattenfall-gives-go-ahead-for-vesterhav-syd-and-nord-offshore-wind-farms

research_summary:
Vattenfall announced it had taken the final investment decision for Vesterhav Syd and Nord on 15 December 2021.


wind_farm_id: 6408
canonical_id: 5a0e6ac0-f4fe-4548-8de7-797544d49e85
wind_farm_name: Vesterhav Nord
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 16/02/2024
resolved_value: 16/02/2024
research_value: 16/02/2024
resolved_fact_id: 40728.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall first-power news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/dk/nyheder-og-presse/nyheder/2024/vattenfall-leverer-nu-forste-strom-fra-vesterhav-nord-havvindmollepark

research_summary:
VattenfallΓÇÖs Danish news release states that on 16 February 2024 production started from the first turbine at Vesterhav Nord. Secondary industry reporting matches this date.

source_of_record_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/dk/nyheder-og-presse/nyheder/2024/vattenfall-leverer-nu-forste-strom-fra-vesterhav-nord-havvindmollepark


wind_farm_id: 6408
canonical_id: 5a0e6ac0-f4fe-4548-8de7-797544d49e85
wind_farm_name: Vesterhav Nord
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2024-03-01
resolved_value: 2024-03-01
research_value: 01/03/2024
resolved_fact_id: 9792.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
The clearest accessible current evidence is the project holding companyΓÇÖs annual report 2024, which says the wind farm "went into full operation during 1st quarter of 2024"; normalized here to 01/03/2024 because only quarter-level timing is explicit. The linked EuroWindWakes row also gives commissioning date 01/03/2024, which supports this normalized value.


wind_farm_id: 6409
canonical_id: bfd136e1-fd38-4b34-a5a1-fd5aa397a47b
wind_farm_name: Bornholm I
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/2554/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency technical report
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/2554/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Bornholm I (part of Bornholm Energy Island / EnergiΓö£Γòò Bornholm); sub-areas include Bornholm I North and Bornholm I South

research_value:
Bornholm I (part of Bornholm Energy Island / EnergiΓö£Γòò Bornholm); sub-areas include Bornholm I North and Bornholm I South

research_summary:
Danish Energy Agency technical and programme material identifies three reserved OWF areas: Bornholm I South, Bornholm I North, and Bornholm II. Public-facing official project pages usually refer to the combined programme as Bornholm Energy Island / EnergiΓö£Γòò Bornholm rather than marketing Bornholm I as a separate project name.


wind_farm_id: 6409
canonical_id: bfd136e1-fd38-4b34-a5a1-fd5aa397a47b
wind_farm_name: Bornholm I
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 40730.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/bornholm-energy-island
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency Bornholm Energy Island page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/bornholm-energy-island
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Danish state-led programme; offshore wind tender authority is the Danish Energy Agency. Transmission/hub developers: Energinet and 50Hertz for the grid/hub infrastructure. Current equity owners of a standalone Bornholm I wind farm: Not confirmed. Operator: Not confirmed.

resolved_value:
Developer: Danish state-led programme; offshore wind tender authority is the Danish Energy Agency. Transmission/hub developers: Energinet and 50Hertz for the grid/hub infrastructure. Current equity owners of a standalone Bornholm I wind farm: Not confirmed. Operator: Not confirmed.

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on for development structure: 26/01/2026 official Bornholm Energy Island project update confirms Energinet and 50Hertz are advancing the joint German-Danish infrastructure project, while the Danish Energy Agency page states the DEA runs the offshore wind tender. No awarded project company or reconciled equity ownership split for a standalone Bornholm I wind farm could be confirmed, so ownership is not yet confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6409
canonical_id: bfd136e1-fd38-4b34-a5a1-fd5aa397a47b
wind_farm_name: Bornholm I
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Bornholm Energy Island project update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://bornholmenergyisland.eu/en/index/agreement-on-bornholm-energy-island-project-for-future-offshore-undertakings

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on: 26/01/2026. Available official sources describe an intergovernmental / TSO partnership for transmission and programme delivery, but do not show a closed ownership structure for a standalone Bornholm I wind farm. No transfer history or equity percentages could be reconciled from authoritative public sources.

source_of_record_url:
https://bornholmenergyisland.eu/en/index/agreement-on-bornholm-energy-island-project-for-future-offshore-undertakings


wind_farm_id: 6409
canonical_id: bfd136e1-fd38-4b34-a5a1-fd5aa397a47b
wind_farm_name: Bornholm I
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Concept
resolved_value: Concept
research_value: Concept
resolved_fact_id: 40731.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/2554/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency technical report
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/2554/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Bornholm I exists as a reserved/planned offshore wind area within the broader Bornholm Energy Island programme. Official sources confirm planning frameworks, environmental/permitting progress for associated facilities, and a political funding framework, but no standalone Bornholm I project-specific wind farm consent, FID, construction start, or awarded owner/operator was confirmed. Closest Boundary Layer label is therefore Concept.


wind_farm_id: 6409
canonical_id: bfd136e1-fd38-4b34-a5a1-fd5aa397a47b
wind_farm_name: Bornholm I
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 40804.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/bornholm-energy-island
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency Bornholm Energy Island page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/bornholm-energy-island
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Not confirmed for Bornholm I standalone; wider Bornholm Energy Island offshore wind capacity is minimum 3 GW with up to 0.8 GW overplanting (up to 3.8 GW total)

resolved_value:
Not confirmed for Bornholm I standalone; wider Bornholm Energy Island offshore wind capacity is minimum 3 GW with up to 0.8 GW overplanting (up to 3.8 GW total)

research_summary:
Public official sources clearly confirm 3 GW for the broader Bornholm Energy Island offshore wind project and up to 3.8 GW in planning/technical framework material for the wider reserved wind farm areas. However, no authoritative public source found in this search gave a standalone installed/planned MW figure specifically for Bornholm I alone, so this field is kept as Not confirmed rather than inferring a split.


wind_farm_id: 6409
canonical_id: bfd136e1-fd38-4b34-a5a1-fd5aa397a47b
wind_farm_name: Bornholm I
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed for Bornholm I standalone
resolved_value: Not confirmed for Bornholm I standalone
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 40805.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/bornholm-energy-island
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency Bornholm Energy Island page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/bornholm-energy-island
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
An accessible Danish Energy Agency technical market dialogue source confirms programme-level transmission values of 1.2 GW between Denmark (DK2) and Bornholm Energy Island (BEI) and 2.0 GW between BEI and Germany, but no project-specific MEC for Bornholm I alone was explicitly stated. The row therefore remains Not confirmed rather than assigning programme-level interconnector values to the Bornholm I wind area.


wind_farm_id: 6409
canonical_id: bfd136e1-fd38-4b34-a5a1-fd5aa397a47b
wind_farm_name: Bornholm I
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/2113/download/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Plan for Programme Energy Island Bornholm
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/2113/download/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine row was provided, and no project-specific web source tied a turbine model to Bornholm I. Planning material uses example visualisations and scenario assumptions, which are not treated as confirmed as-built or awarded turbine data.


wind_farm_id: 6409
canonical_id: bfd136e1-fd38-4b34-a5a1-fd5aa397a47b
wind_farm_name: Bornholm I
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/2554/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency technical report
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/2554/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No authoritative project-specific source confirmed a selected turbine rating for Bornholm I. Planning documents include scenario assumptions only and are not treated as awarded turbine specifications.


wind_farm_id: 6409
canonical_id: bfd136e1-fd38-4b34-a5a1-fd5aa397a47b
wind_farm_name: Bornholm I
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/bornholm-energy-island
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency Bornholm Energy Island page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/bornholm-energy-island
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes fallback was available, and no project-specific web source confirmed hub height. Hub height is therefore left Not confirmed and not inferred from generic turbine platforms.


wind_farm_id: 6409
canonical_id: bfd136e1-fd38-4b34-a5a1-fd5aa397a47b
wind_farm_name: Bornholm I
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 8556.0
resolved_source_type: emodnet
resolved_source_name: EMODnet Human Activities
resolved_source_detail: EMODnet Jan 2026
citation_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMODnet Human Activities
source_of_record_type: public data portal
source_of_record_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
source_of_record_licence: Free and open public portal
research_source_name: Danish Energy Agency technical report
research_source_type: government document
research_source_url: https://ens.dk/media/2554/download
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
No authoritative web source found a confirmed turbine count for Bornholm I. The planning material refers to reserved areas and scenario layouts, not a final project configuration. This differs from the database validation hint of 0 turbines; that database figure likely reflects the project╬ô├ç├ûs early conceptual status rather than a final design.


wind_farm_id: 6409
canonical_id: bfd136e1-fd38-4b34-a5a1-fd5aa397a47b
wind_farm_name: Bornholm I
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/danish-energy-agency-publishes-plan-program-bornholm-energy-island
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/danish-energy-agency-publishes-plan-program-bornholm-energy-island
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The programme planning framework was adopted on 13/05/2024, but that is not a standalone Bornholm I construction consent. No project-specific consent date for Bornholm I wind turbines was confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6409
canonical_id: bfd136e1-fd38-4b34-a5a1-fd5aa397a47b
wind_farm_name: Bornholm I
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Bornholm Energy Island project update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://bornholmenergyisland.eu/en/index/green-light-for-bornholm-energy-island-major-contracts-with-suppliers-signed

research_summary:
Official sources show political agreements and supply-chain contracts for transmission infrastructure, but no standalone wind-farm FID for Bornholm I was found.

source_of_record_url:
https://bornholmenergyisland.eu/en/index/green-light-for-bornholm-energy-island-major-contracts-with-suppliers-signed


wind_farm_id: 6409
canonical_id: bfd136e1-fd38-4b34-a5a1-fd5aa397a47b
wind_farm_name: Bornholm I
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DK Havenergi article
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.doi.dk/en/havenergi/artikel/energinet-faar-miljoetilladelser-til-energioe-bornholms-kabler-og-transformerstationer

research_summary:
No standalone Bornholm I first-power milestone was confirmed. A 2026 industry article mentions the broader Bornholm Energy Island project being expected operational in 2036, but that is not a first-power date for Bornholm I and is not used as confirmation.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.doi.dk/en/havenergi/artikel/energinet-faar-miljoetilladelser-til-energioe-bornholms-kabler-og-transformerstationer


wind_farm_id: 6409
canonical_id: bfd136e1-fd38-4b34-a5a1-fd5aa397a47b
wind_farm_name: Bornholm I
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
research_summary: No standalone Bornholm I commissioning date was confirmed.
source_of_record_name: European Commission news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://energy.ec.europa.eu/news/energy-highways-germany-and-denmark-agree-joint-development-bornholm-energy-island-offshore-wind-2026-01-26_en?prefLang=fr

source_of_record_url:
https://energy.ec.europa.eu/news/energy-highways-germany-and-denmark-agree-joint-development-bornholm-energy-island-offshore-wind-2026-01-26_en?prefLang=fr


wind_farm_id: 6411
canonical_id: 0d1bf8b9-17da-423c-9401-1f38f09a3241
wind_farm_name: Nordsren II
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Nordsren II
research_value: Nordsren II
citation_url: https://kyst.dk/media/1tmltgbo/2025-11062-hoeringsmateriale.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Aurora Project Denmark EIA Screening
source_of_record_url: https://kyst.dk/media/1tmltgbo/2025-11062-hoeringsmateriale.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Public web evidence confirms the name Nordsren II as one of several Danish North Sea offshore wind lease areas / planned areas. I did not find a project-specific official webpage with fuller identity details, so no historic/alternative project name is confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6411
canonical_id: 0d1bf8b9-17da-423c-9401-1f38f09a3241
wind_farm_name: Nordsren II
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://kyst.dk/media/1tmltgbo/2025-11062-hoeringsmateriale.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Aurora Project Denmark EIA Screening
source_of_record_url: https://kyst.dk/media/1tmltgbo/2025-11062-hoeringsmateriale.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I found no authoritative, project-specific official page openly confirming a named developer, owner, operator, or JV structure for Nordsren II itself. Some third-party planning appendices list nearby Danish projects, but those are not reliable enough to assign ownership for this specific project. Freshest source date relied on for this conclusion: 30/01/2025 Aurora EIA screening, which refers only to the lease areas, not ownership.


wind_farm_id: 6411
canonical_id: 0d1bf8b9-17da-423c-9401-1f38f09a3241
wind_farm_name: Nordsren II
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://kyst.dk/media/1tmltgbo/2025-11062-hoeringsmateriale.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Aurora Project Denmark EIA Screening
source_of_record_url: https://kyst.dk/media/1tmltgbo/2025-11062-hoeringsmateriale.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible authoritative ownership history was found for Nordsren II. Freshest source date relied on: 30/01/2025; that source still treats Nordsren II generically as a lease area, with no transfer history or sponsor named.


wind_farm_id: 6411
canonical_id: 0d1bf8b9-17da-423c-9401-1f38f09a3241
wind_farm_name: Nordsren II
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Concept
resolved_value: Concept
research_value: Concept
resolved_fact_id: 40800.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Outer Dowsing planning material
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010130/EN010130-001631-7.1%20Report%20to%20Inform%20Appropriate%20Assessment%20Tracked.pdf

research_summary:
The strongest accessible evidence describes Nordsren II as a lease area with final site details not yet known and construction expected later; another recent assessment treats it as Concept/Early. That best fits the Boundary Layer status Concept. This broadly aligns with the database validation context showing EMODnet status Concept.

source_of_record_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010130/EN010130-001631-7.1%20Report%20to%20Inform%20Appropriate%20Assessment%20Tracked.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6411
canonical_id: 0d1bf8b9-17da-423c-9401-1f38f09a3241
wind_farm_name: Nordsren II
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 7420.0
resolved_source_type: emodnet
resolved_source_name: EMODnet Human Activities
resolved_source_detail: EMODnet Jan 2026
citation_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMODnet Human Activities
source_of_record_type: public data portal
source_of_record_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
source_of_record_licence: Free and open public portal
research_source_name: Aurora Project Denmark EIA Screening
research_source_type: regulatory / consultation PDF
research_source_url: https://kyst.dk/media/1tmltgbo/2025-11062-hoeringsmateriale.pdf
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
No openly accessible authoritative source found a project-specific planned MW figure for Nordsren II. Do not infer from neighboring Danish or Norwegian projects. EMODnet fallback context also shows 0 MW, which is consistent with an early concept/placeholder row rather than a confirmed design.


wind_farm_id: 6411
canonical_id: 0d1bf8b9-17da-423c-9401-1f38f09a3241
wind_farm_name: Nordsren II
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://kyst.dk/media/1tmltgbo/2025-11062-hoeringsmateriale.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Aurora Project Denmark EIA Screening
source_of_record_url: https://kyst.dk/media/1tmltgbo/2025-11062-hoeringsmateriale.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific MEC/export-capacity value could be confirmed from accessible official or regulatory material for Nordsren II.


wind_farm_id: 6411
canonical_id: 0d1bf8b9-17da-423c-9401-1f38f09a3241
wind_farm_name: Nordsren II
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ossian-eia.com/riaa/part-two/part-19.html
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ossian cumulative assessment page
source_of_record_url: https://ossian-eia.com/riaa/part-two/part-19.html
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided in the prompt, and no project-specific web source confirms a turbine model for Nordsren II. Per instructions, this remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6411
canonical_id: 0d1bf8b9-17da-423c-9401-1f38f09a3241
wind_farm_name: Nordsren II
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ossian-eia.com/riaa/part-two/part-19.html
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ossian cumulative assessment page
source_of_record_url: https://ossian-eia.com/riaa/part-two/part-19.html
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific OEM confirmation found. No EuroWindWakes linked turbine row was provided, so no dataset fallback applies.


wind_farm_id: 6411
canonical_id: 0d1bf8b9-17da-423c-9401-1f38f09a3241
wind_farm_name: Nordsren II
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ossian-eia.com/riaa/part-two/part-19.html
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ossian cumulative assessment page
source_of_record_url: https://ossian-eia.com/riaa/part-two/part-19.html
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific turbine rating was found, and none should be inferred from generic turbine platforms or nearby projects.


wind_farm_id: 6411
canonical_id: 0d1bf8b9-17da-423c-9401-1f38f09a3241
wind_farm_name: Nordsren II
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ossian-eia.com/riaa/part-two/part-19.html
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ossian cumulative assessment page
source_of_record_url: https://ossian-eia.com/riaa/part-two/part-19.html
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes fallback value exists in the prompt, and no project-specific web source confirms hub height; therefore Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6411
canonical_id: 0d1bf8b9-17da-423c-9401-1f38f09a3241
wind_farm_name: Nordsren II
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: 0
resolved_fact_id: 40801.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://kyst.dk/media/1tmltgbo/2025-11062-hoeringsmateriale.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Aurora Project Denmark EIA Screening
source_of_record_url: https://kyst.dk/media/1tmltgbo/2025-11062-hoeringsmateriale.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No web source confirms an actual planned turbine count. Given the project is still a lease area / concept with no final site details, I retain 0 as the most conservative database-aligned value rather than inventing a design count. This aligns with the validation signals in the prompt: database winner candidate 0 and EMODnet hint 0; likely reason is that the row represents an undeveloped lease area rather than a consented wind farm layout.


wind_farm_id: 6411
canonical_id: 0d1bf8b9-17da-423c-9401-1f38f09a3241
wind_farm_name: Nordsren II
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ossian-eia.com/riaa/part-two/part-19.html
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ossian cumulative assessment page
source_of_record_url: https://ossian-eia.com/riaa/part-two/part-19.html
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific foundation type is confirmed. A third-party cumulative assessment assumed piling as a precaution because scoping reports could not be obtained, but that is not evidence of an actual chosen foundation concept for this project.


wind_farm_id: 6411
canonical_id: 0d1bf8b9-17da-423c-9401-1f38f09a3241
wind_farm_name: Nordsren II
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Outer Dowsing planning material
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010130/EN010130-001631-7.1%20Report%20to%20Inform%20Appropriate%20Assessment%20Tracked.pdf

research_summary:
No project-specific consent or permit date found. Current evidence indicates a lease area / concept stage, not a consented project.


wind_farm_id: 6411
canonical_id: 0d1bf8b9-17da-423c-9401-1f38f09a3241
wind_farm_name: Nordsren II
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Outer Dowsing planning material
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No commissioning date is confirmed; accessible evidence still points to a pre-planning concept / lease-area stage.


wind_farm_id: 6419
canonical_id: 7ec82853-73b6-4a22-977f-7753ac13b481
wind_farm_name: Krigers Flak Syd
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Kriegers Flak Syd; alternative / related planning name: Kriegers Flak II (South / Syd)
research_value: Kriegers Flak Syd; alternative / related planning name: Kriegers Flak II (South / Syd)
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/5223/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency/COWI wind resource, layouts and energy production report
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/5223/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project name is phase-sensitive. Current Danish regulator material uses Kriegers Flak II for the combined north+south plan area, while technical screening documents explicitly identify the southern sub-area as Kriegers Flak Syd. This profile therefore assesses the south sub-area within Kriegers Flak II to resolve the name ambiguity.


wind_farm_id: 6419
canonical_id: 7ec82853-73b6-4a22-977f-7753ac13b481
wind_farm_name: Krigers Flak Syd
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 40812.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – Kriegers Flak II Havvindmøllepark
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Not confirmed; Current owner(s): None confirmed; Equity partners: Not confirmed; Operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: Not confirmed; Current owner(s): None confirmed; Equity partners: Not confirmed; Operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
No project company or concessionaire is in place for Kriegers Flak Syd specifically. The freshest source relied on is the Danish Energy Agency project page dated by visible 2025 process text, which says planning continues but the tender was cancelled on 31/01/2025 and no new tender date has been published. Earlier DEA material confirms Energinet only has permits for preliminary site investigations, not development rights.


wind_farm_id: 6419
canonical_id: 7ec82853-73b6-4a22-977f-7753ac13b481
wind_farm_name: Krigers Flak Syd
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: No ownership transfer history confirmed; state-led planning area only
research_value: No ownership transfer history confirmed; state-led planning area only
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ministry of Climate, Energy and Utilities news release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.kefm.dk/aktuelt/nyheder/2025/maj/ny-politisk-aftale-om-groen-stroem-fra-havvindmoeller-bidrager-til-et-groennere-og-mere-sikkert-danmark

research_summary:
The freshest source date relied on is 19/05/2025 from the Ministry of Climate, Energy and Utilities, confirming a political agreement to continue planning for 3 GW of new offshore wind, including Kriegers Flak II-area development. DEA material shows the project remained in state planning / tender preparation, with the previous tender cancelled on 31/01/2025 before any owner was appointed.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.kefm.dk/aktuelt/nyheder/2025/maj/ny-politisk-aftale-om-groen-stroem-fra-havvindmoeller-bidrager-til-et-groennere-og-mere-sikkert-danmark


wind_farm_id: 6419
canonical_id: 7ec82853-73b6-4a22-977f-7753ac13b481
wind_farm_name: Krigers Flak Syd
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Concept
resolved_value: Concept
research_value: Concept
resolved_fact_id: 40813.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – Kriegers Flak II Havvindmøllepark
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Kriegers Flak Syd is still a planning sub-area with no awarded developer, no project-specific consent, and no FID. Although Kriegers Flak II has an adopted strategic plan and environmental assessment, the concrete project still requires a future concession winner and project-level EIA / establishment permit. For the specific Kriegers Flak Syd sub-area, the closest Boundary Layer label is Concept rather than a later stage.


wind_farm_id: 6419
canonical_id: 7ec82853-73b6-4a22-977f-7753ac13b481
wind_farm_name: Krigers Flak Syd
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 7430.0
resolved_source_type: emodnet
resolved_source_name: EMODnet Human Activities
resolved_source_detail: EMODnet Jan 2026
citation_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMODnet Human Activities
source_of_record_type: public data portal
source_of_record_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
source_of_record_licence: Free and open public portal
research_source_name: Danish Energy Agency press release on adopted plan
research_source_type: regulator
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Official sources give capacity for the combined Kriegers Flak II area, not a separate MW value for the south sub-area alone. DEA states the plan covers minimum 1,000 MW in the whole area (both North and South), and the 2024 environmental material assesses a wider possible range for the full area. No web source found an allocated MW figure specifically for Kriegers Flak Syd only.


wind_farm_id: 6419
canonical_id: 7ec82853-73b6-4a22-977f-7753ac13b481
wind_farm_name: Krigers Flak Syd
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – Kriegers Flak II Havvindmøllepark
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No source found a project-specific MEC for Kriegers Flak Syd. DEA sources discuss combined Kriegers Flak II planning, grid connection via a new station in Southeast Zealand, and future project-level development, but do not state a separate MEC for the south sub-area.


wind_farm_id: 6419
canonical_id: 7ec82853-73b6-4a22-977f-7753ac13b481
wind_farm_name: Krigers Flak Syd
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – Kriegers Flak II Havvindmøllepark
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific turbine model is confirmed for Kriegers Flak Syd. DEA states the final turbine type and size will be chosen by the future concession winner and project-level assessments. No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided in the task context, so no dataset fallback applies here.


wind_farm_id: 6419
canonical_id: 7ec82853-73b6-4a22-977f-7753ac13b481
wind_farm_name: Krigers Flak Syd
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – Kriegers Flak II Havvindmøllepark
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No OEM has been selected. Current official material remains at strategic planning / future tender stage.


wind_farm_id: 6419
canonical_id: 7ec82853-73b6-4a22-977f-7753ac13b481
wind_farm_name: Krigers Flak Syd
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ministry of Climate, Energy and Utilities news release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.kefm.dk/aktuelt/nyheder/2025/maj/ny-politisk-aftale-om-groen-stroem-fra-havvindmoeller-bidrager-til-et-groennere-og-mere-sikkert-danmark

research_summary:
The 19/05/2025 ministry factsheet gives only an illustrative example for the 3 GW programme and explicitly says developers will choose turbine type and size. That is not project-specific confirmation for Kriegers Flak Syd, so the field remains not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6419
canonical_id: 7ec82853-73b6-4a22-977f-7753ac13b481
wind_farm_name: Krigers Flak Syd
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ministry of Climate, Energy and Utilities news release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific rotor diameter is confirmed for Kriegers Flak Syd. The 2025 ministry note gives only an illustrative market-wide example, not a site-specific selected turbine.


wind_farm_id: 6419
canonical_id: 7ec82853-73b6-4a22-977f-7753ac13b481
wind_farm_name: Krigers Flak Syd
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – Kriegers Flak II Havvindmøllepark
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific hub height is confirmed for Kriegers Flak Syd. Current official material does not tie a hub height to this sub-area, and no linked EuroWindWakes fallback was provided.


wind_farm_id: 6419
canonical_id: 7ec82853-73b6-4a22-977f-7753ac13b481
wind_farm_name: Krigers Flak Syd
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 8568.0
resolved_source_type: emodnet
resolved_source_name: EMODnet Human Activities
resolved_source_detail: EMODnet Jan 2026
citation_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMODnet Human Activities
source_of_record_type: public data portal
source_of_record_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
source_of_record_licence: Free and open public portal
research_source_name: Danish Energy Agency press release on adopted plan
research_source_type: regulator
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
No turbine count is confirmed for Kriegers Flak Syd alone. Official sources discuss only the combined Kriegers Flak II area and future developer choice. This differs from the database validation signal of 0, which likely reflects an early-stage or placeholder dataset value rather than a confirmed designed turbine count.


wind_farm_id: 6419
canonical_id: 7ec82853-73b6-4a22-977f-7753ac13b481
wind_farm_name: Krigers Flak Syd
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – Kriegers Flak II Havvindmøllepark
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific foundation type is confirmed. DEA strategic materials indicate the concrete project and turbine setup will be defined later by the concession winner and project-level EIA.


wind_farm_id: 6419
canonical_id: 7ec82853-73b6-4a22-977f-7753ac13b481
wind_farm_name: Krigers Flak Syd
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – Kriegers Flak II Havvindmøllepark
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
There is no project-specific construction / establishment consent for Kriegers Flak Syd. Strategic plan adoption for Kriegers Flak II is not the same as a project consent for this sub-area.


wind_farm_id: 6419
canonical_id: 7ec82853-73b6-4a22-977f-7753ac13b481
wind_farm_name: Krigers Flak Syd
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – Kriegers Flak II Havvindmøllepark
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No first power date is published for Kriegers Flak Syd. Recent official sources instead say DEA will publish a preliminary timeline when there is more clarity on process and commissioning timing.


wind_farm_id: 6419
canonical_id: 7ec82853-73b6-4a22-977f-7753ac13b481
wind_farm_name: Krigers Flak Syd
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – Kriegers Flak II Havvindmøllepark
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/kriegers-flak-ii-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Older 2024 DEA planning material said the broader Kriegers Flak II wind farm was expected to be fully operational by end-2030, but the tender was later cancelled on 31/01/2025 and replaced by a new 3 GW framework. Because the user asked for Kriegers Flak Syd, and the programme has changed, a sub-area commissioning date is not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6422
canonical_id: 30d8bea7-a7a9-46bb-8167-1fe53627209c
wind_farm_name: Bornholm
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Bornholm Energy Island; also styled Energiø Bornholm / BEI
research_value: Bornholm Energy Island; also styled Energiø Bornholm / BEI
citation_url: https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/bornholm-energy-island
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency project page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/bornholm-energy-island
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current official naming is Bornholm Energy Island / Energiø Bornholm. Official pages describe offshore wind farms approx. 15 km south-southwest of Bornholm connected via a hub on Bornholm. This is distinct from the older 50 MW “Bornholm Offshore Wind Farm” nearshore tender documentation from 2016.


wind_farm_id: 6422
canonical_id: 30d8bea7-a7a9-46bb-8167-1fe53627209c
wind_farm_name: Bornholm
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 40862.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/bornholm-energy-island
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency project page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/bornholm-energy-island
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer / responsible authority for offshore wind tender: Danish Energy Agency; transmission/hub developers: Energinet and 50Hertz; current private wind-farm owner(s): Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer / responsible authority for offshore wind tender: Danish Energy Agency; transmission/hub developers: Energinet and 50Hertz; current private wind-farm owner(s): Not confirmed

research_summary:
The freshest official ownership/developer evidence is the 05/02/2026 EU/Commission news confirming Denmark and Germany agreed joint development of Bornholm Energy Island, alongside the project site and DEA pages. DEA states it is the authority responsible for the supply/tender of offshore wind; Energinet and 50Hertz are developing the electrical infrastructure. No concession winner / private equity ownership split for the offshore wind farms is yet confirmed publicly.


wind_farm_id: 6422
canonical_id: 30d8bea7-a7a9-46bb-8167-1fe53627209c
wind_farm_name: Bornholm
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/danish-energy-agency-publishes-plan-program-bornholm-energy-island
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA Plan for Program press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/danish-energy-agency-publishes-plan-program-bornholm-energy-island
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No wind-farm equity owner history is confirmed because the offshore wind farms have not yet been awarded to a concessionaire. Freshest relied-on source date is 13/05/2024 on DEA’s plan update, which still says the offshore tender is being prepared, plus the 26/01/2026 intergovernmental update showing the project framework is still being set at state/TSO level.


wind_farm_id: 6422
canonical_id: 30d8bea7-a7a9-46bb-8167-1fe53627209c
wind_farm_name: Bornholm
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Development Zone / lease area
resolved_value: Development Zone / lease area
research_value: Development Zone / lease area
resolved_fact_id: 40863.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/danish-energy-agency-publishes-plan-program-bornholm-energy-island
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA Plan for Program press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/danish-energy-agency-publishes-plan-program-bornholm-energy-island
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Best fit is Development Zone/ lease area. DEA adopted the plan framework on 13/05/2024 but stated “the plan alone does not allow for construction” and that the offshore tender was still being prepared. By late 2025/early 2026 the electrical infrastructure had moved into implementation/procurement and permitting, but the wind farms themselves still lacked a confirmed concessionaire/FID.


wind_farm_id: 6422
canonical_id: 30d8bea7-a7a9-46bb-8167-1fe53627209c
wind_farm_name: Bornholm
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 3,800 MW planned
resolved_value: Up to 3,800 MW planned
research_value: Up to 3,800 MW planned
resolved_fact_id: 40864.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/danish-energy-agency-publishes-plan-program-bornholm-energy-island
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA Plan for Program press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/danish-energy-agency-publishes-plan-program-bornholm-energy-island
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
DEA’s 13/05/2024 plan says the energy island “will have a capacity of up to 3.8 GW”. DEA’s project page also states 3 GW, reflecting the base political capacity before overplanting. The most specific current planning figure for the project is therefore up to 3,800 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6422
canonical_id: 30d8bea7-a7a9-46bb-8167-1fe53627209c
wind_farm_name: Bornholm
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 3,000 MW
resolved_value: 3,000 MW
research_value: 3,000 MW
resolved_fact_id: 40865.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Bornholm Energy Island suppliers-signed update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://bornholmenergyisland.eu/en/index/green-light-for-bornholm-energy-island-major-contracts-with-suppliers-signed

research_summary:
Multiple official sources describe Bornholm Energy Island as able to transmit at least / initially 3 GW to Denmark and Germany, while 3.8 GW reflects possible overplanting generation. Thus the clearest export-capacity figure is 3,000 MW MEC.


wind_farm_id: 6422
canonical_id: 30d8bea7-a7a9-46bb-8167-1fe53627209c
wind_farm_name: Bornholm
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA preliminary investigations page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/offshore-wind-power/preliminary-site-investigations-energy-islands/publication-0

research_summary:
No project-specific accessible official source found that names a selected turbine model for the Bornholm Energy Island wind farms. The plan materials discuss layout assumptions and turbine envelope sizes only; no awarded OEM/model for the wind farm itself is confirmed. EuroWindWakes linked turbine metadata was not provided in the prompt, so no dataset fallback is available.

source_of_record_url:
https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/offshore-wind-power/preliminary-site-investigations-energy-islands/publication-0


wind_farm_id: 6422
canonical_id: 30d8bea7-a7a9-46bb-8167-1fe53627209c
wind_farm_name: Bornholm
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Bornholm Energy Island suppliers-signed update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Not confirmed for the offshore wind farm turbines. Siemens Energy and NKT contracts announced in 2024 relate to electrical infrastructure, not wind-turbine supply.


wind_farm_id: 6422
canonical_id: 30d8bea7-a7a9-46bb-8167-1fe53627209c
wind_farm_name: Bornholm
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/5896/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Energy Island Bornholm technical report PDF
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/5896/download
source_of_record_licence: public document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official planning documents refer to scenario assumptions and maximum dimensions, but no selected project turbine rating has been confirmed for the wind farms. EuroWindWakes linked turbine metadata was absent, so the field remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6422
canonical_id: 30d8bea7-a7a9-46bb-8167-1fe53627209c
wind_farm_name: Bornholm
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/5896/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Energy Island Bornholm technical report PDF
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/5896/download
source_of_record_licence: public document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific accessible source explicitly confirms a chosen rotor diameter for the wind farm. Planning documents use generic/max-envelope assumptions only.


wind_farm_id: 6422
canonical_id: 30d8bea7-a7a9-46bb-8167-1fe53627209c
wind_farm_name: Bornholm
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/5896/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Energy Island Bornholm technical report PDF
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/5896/download
source_of_record_licence: public document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific accessible source explicitly confirms hub height for the selected Bornholm Energy Island turbines, and hub height cannot be inferred from generic turbine platforms.


wind_farm_id: 6422
canonical_id: 30d8bea7-a7a9-46bb-8167-1fe53627209c
wind_farm_name: Bornholm
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 8571.0
resolved_source_type: emodnet
resolved_source_name: EMODnet Human Activities
resolved_source_detail: EMODnet Jan 2026
citation_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMODnet Human Activities
source_of_record_type: public data portal
source_of_record_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
source_of_record_licence: Free and open public portal
research_source_name: Energy Island Bornholm technical report PDF
research_source_type: government PDF
research_source_url: https://ens.dk/media/5896/download
research_source_licence: public document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Web sources confirm only planning envelopes, not a final turbine count. The technical report says the wind farm areas will contain turbines “with a maximum height of 330 m”, but no fixed count is awarded. This differs from the database validation signal of 0 turbines; that likely reflects concept-stage/no awarded layout rather than a real final count of zero.


wind_farm_id: 6422
canonical_id: 30d8bea7-a7a9-46bb-8167-1fe53627209c
wind_farm_name: Bornholm
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/bornholm-energy-island
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency project page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/bornholm-energy-island
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific authoritative source found confirming final foundation type. Available public materials are still at planning/permitting stage and do not identify as-built or contracted foundations for the wind farm.


wind_farm_id: 6422
canonical_id: 30d8bea7-a7a9-46bb-8167-1fe53627209c
wind_farm_name: Bornholm
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 13/05/2024
resolved_value: 13/05/2024
research_value: 13/05/2024
resolved_fact_id: 40866.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/danish-energy-agency-publishes-plan-program-bornholm-energy-island
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA Plan for Program press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/danish-energy-agency-publishes-plan-program-bornholm-energy-island
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
DEA published and adopted the Plan for Program Bornholm Energy Island on 13/05/2024. This is a planning-programme approval, not a full construction consent for the wind farm, but it is the clearest current formal planning consent milestone publicly evidenced.


wind_farm_id: 6422
canonical_id: 30d8bea7-a7a9-46bb-8167-1fe53627209c
wind_farm_name: Bornholm
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Bornholm Energy Island suppliers-signed update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific offshore wind farm FID found. The 2024 supplier-contract announcement says the joint project is moving to implementation for electrical infrastructure, but it does not state an FID for the wind farms themselves.


wind_farm_id: 6422
canonical_id: 30d8bea7-a7a9-46bb-8167-1fe53627209c
wind_farm_name: Bornholm
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/bornholm-energy-island
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency project page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/en/energy-sources/bornholm-energy-island
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No full commissioning date confirmed. The accessible official DEA project page states Bornholm will be the collection point for 3 GW “from 2030”, but this does not confirm a final commissioned/commercial operations date for the specific offshore wind farms.


wind_farm_id: 6424
canonical_id: e522b308-15c7-4112-8bc1-60f0678df098
wind_farm_name: Paludan Flak
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://ultfarms.eu/pilot-1-samso-offshore-wind-farm/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ULTFARMS pilot page
source_of_record_url: https://ultfarms.eu/pilot-1-samso-offshore-wind-farm/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Paludan Flak; built project identified in official sources as Samsø Havvindmøllepark / Samsø Offshore Wind Farm – Paludan Flak

research_value:
Paludan Flak; built project identified in official sources as Samsø Havvindmøllepark / Samsø Offshore Wind Farm – Paludan Flak

research_summary:
There is a name/phase ambiguity. Danish Energy Agency sources use Samsø Havvindmøllepark for the operating 23 MW wind farm at Paludan Flak, while Wind Estate and other project references also use Paludan Flak. ULTFARMS explicitly links the names as “Samsø Offshore Wind Farm - Paludan Flak”.


wind_farm_id: 6424
canonical_id: e522b308-15c7-4112-8bc1-60f0678df098
wind_farm_name: Paludan Flak
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/6610/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA lifetime-extension application/background PDF
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/6610/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Originally: Samsø Havvind A/S; Transferred to: Wind Estate A/S (agreement 01/07/2018, DEA approval 11/04/2019)

research_value:
Originally: Samsø Havvind A/S; Transferred to: Wind Estate A/S (agreement 01/07/2018, DEA approval 11/04/2019)

research_summary:
Freshest dated authoritative source relied on is the 2025 DEA lifetime-extension application pack, which states: conditional transfer agreement on 01/07/2018 and final effect after DEA approval on 11/04/2019. DEA also states the park was erected by Samsø Havvind A/S and later owned by Wind Estate A/S.


wind_farm_id: 6424
canonical_id: e522b308-15c7-4112-8bc1-60f0678df098
wind_farm_name: Paludan Flak
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA existing offshore wind farms
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
DEA confirms a 30 kV subsea cable for grid connection, but no openly accessible authoritative source found in this pass states a distinct export-capacity/MEC figure for the operating Paludan Flak/Samsø project.


wind_farm_id: 6424
canonical_id: e522b308-15c7-4112-8bc1-60f0678df098
wind_farm_name: Paludan Flak
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/6610/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA lifetime-extension application/background PDF
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/6610/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible authoritative source found in this pass explicitly states an FID date for this early community project.


wind_farm_id: 6425
canonical_id: 41d5e640-fdc5-4a0e-967e-c7ce062ed3b7
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev I
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Horns Rev I; also styled Horns Rev 1 / Horns Rev I Offshore Wind Farm
research_value: Horns Rev I; also styled Horns Rev 1 / Horns Rev I Offshore Wind Farm
citation_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/wind-project-sites/horns-rev-1
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Tethys Horns Rev 1 project page
source_of_record_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/wind-project-sites/horns-rev-1
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific sources consistently identify the first phase as Horns Rev 1/I, distinct from later Horns Rev 2 and 3 phases. Vattenfall’s plant page and Tethys both tie the name to the 2002 first-phase project.


wind_farm_id: 6425
canonical_id: 41d5e640-fdc5-4a0e-967e-c7ce062ed3b7
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev I
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Developed by Elsam; current owners Vattenfall (60%) and Ørsted (40%); operator: Vattenfall
resolved_value: Developed by Elsam; current owners Vattenfall (60%) and Ørsted (40%); operator: Vattenfall
research_value: Developed by Elsam; current owners Vattenfall 60% and Ørsted 40%; operator: Vattenfall
resolved_fact_id: 9942.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://group.vattenfall.com/dk/nyheder-og-presse/nyheder/2023/en-agte-havvinds-pioner-fylder-20-ar
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall 20-year article
source_of_record_url: https://group.vattenfall.com/dk/nyheder-og-presse/nyheder/2023/en-agte-havvinds-pioner-fylder-20-ar
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Vattenfall’s 2023 anniversary page states Elsam built the project; since 2006 Vattenfall has owned 60% and Ørsted 40%, and Vattenfall operates it. Tethys, updated 19/03/2026, also states joint ownership by Vattenfall (60%) and Ørsted (40%). Freshest ownership confirmation relied on: Tethys info updated 19/03/2026, supported by Vattenfall page published 2023.


wind_farm_id: 6425
canonical_id: 41d5e640-fdc5-4a0e-967e-c7ce062ed3b7
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev I
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/wind-project-sites/horns-rev-1
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Tethys Horns Rev 1 project page
source_of_record_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/wind-project-sites/horns-rev-1
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Initially developed/owned by Elsam; Vattenfall acquired 60% in 2005/2006 period; current split remains Vattenfall 60% / Ørsted 40%

research_value:
Initially developed/owned by Elsam; Vattenfall acquired 60% in 2005/2006 period; current split remains Vattenfall 60% / Ørsted 40%

research_summary:
Tethys timeline records Vattenfall acquiring a 60% stake in 2005, while Vattenfall’s 2023 article says Vattenfall has been co-owner since 2006; this is likely announcement/transaction-close timing rather than a true ownership conflict. Freshest source date relied on for current split: Tethys updated 19/03/2026; ownership-history context supported by Vattenfall 2023.


wind_farm_id: 6425
canonical_id: 41d5e640-fdc5-4a0e-967e-c7ce062ed3b7
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev I
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 9943.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/horns-rev/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall power plant page
source_of_record_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/horns-rev/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Vattenfall lists status as “In Operation”, and Tethys lists status as “Operating”. This maps cleanly to the Boundary Layer label Operational.


wind_farm_id: 6425
canonical_id: 41d5e640-fdc5-4a0e-967e-c7ce062ed3b7
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev I
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 160 MW
resolved_value: 160 MW
research_value: 160 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9944.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/wind-project-sites/horns-rev-1
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Tethys Horns Rev 1 project page
source_of_record_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/wind-project-sites/horns-rev-1
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Tethys gives installed capacity as 160 MW and Vestas’ 03/01/2001 announcement says the project capacity would be 160 MW. Vattenfall’s current asset page shows 158 MWe, likely net/electrical plant naming; for installed project capacity, 160 MW is better supported.


wind_farm_id: 6425
canonical_id: 41d5e640-fdc5-4a0e-967e-c7ce062ed3b7
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev I
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/horns-rev/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall power plant page
source_of_record_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/horns-rev/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Open sources confirm a 150 kV export connection and offshore transformer platform, but no authoritative accessible source found that explicitly states MEC for Horns Rev I as a named project value. To avoid conflating installed capacity with export rating, MEC is left not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6425
canonical_id: 41d5e640-fdc5-4a0e-967e-c7ce062ed3b7
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev I
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas V80-2.0 MW
resolved_value: Vestas V80-2.0 MW
research_value: Vestas V80-2.0 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9945.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://mb.cision.com/Main/18886/2965730/1144997.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vestas stock exchange announcement PDF
source_of_record_url: https://mb.cision.com/Main/18886/2965730/1144997.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Vestas’ 03/01/2001 project-specific announcement says “The chosen turbine type is Vestas' V80-2,0MW”. Tethys also lists turbine model V80-2.0 for Horns Rev 1.


wind_farm_id: 6425
canonical_id: 41d5e640-fdc5-4a0e-967e-c7ce062ed3b7
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev I
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas
resolved_value: Vestas
research_value: Vestas
resolved_fact_id: 9019.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Vattenfall power plant page
research_source_type: operator webpage
research_source_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/horns-rev/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Vattenfall’s plant page lists supplier Vestas, and Tethys lists turbine developer Vestas Wind Systems A/S for this project.


wind_farm_id: 6425
canonical_id: 41d5e640-fdc5-4a0e-967e-c7ce062ed3b7
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev I
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2
resolved_value: 2
research_value: 2 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9329.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Tethys Horns Rev 1 project page
research_source_type: open project database
research_source_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/wind-project-sites/horns-rev-1
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Vestas’ project announcement specifies V80-2.0 MW turbines, and Tethys lists capacity per turbine as 2 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6425
canonical_id: 41d5e640-fdc5-4a0e-967e-c7ce062ed3b7
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev I
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 80
resolved_value: 80
research_value: 80 m
resolved_fact_id: 9484.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Tethys explicitly lists rotor diameter 80 m. Project-specific web sourcing for this exact field is otherwise thin, so the linked EuroWindWakes dataset value 80 m is used as the required fallback and it aligns with Tethys.


wind_farm_id: 6425
canonical_id: 41d5e640-fdc5-4a0e-967e-c7ce062ed3b7
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev I
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 70
resolved_value: 70
research_value: 70 m
resolved_fact_id: 9639.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Tethys explicitly lists hub height 70 m. Because hub height is a turbine-site-specific field and project-specific corroboration is limited, the linked EuroWindWakes dataset fallback value 70 m is also used and matches Tethys.


wind_farm_id: 6425
canonical_id: 41d5e640-fdc5-4a0e-967e-c7ce062ed3b7
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev I
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 80
resolved_value: 80
research_value: 80
resolved_fact_id: 48481.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 80 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Vattenfall power plant page
research_source_type: operator webpage
research_source_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/horns-rev/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Vattenfall and Tethys both state 80 turbines. This aligns with the EMODnet hint of 80 and differs from the 63 linked-location validation signal; the most likely explanation is incomplete linked turbine-location coverage in that dataset rather than actual as-built count.


wind_farm_id: 6425
canonical_id: 41d5e640-fdc5-4a0e-967e-c7ce062ed3b7
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev I
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile
resolved_value: Monopile
research_value: Monopile
resolved_fact_id: 9951.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/wind-project-sites/horns-rev-1
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Tethys Horns Rev 1 project page
source_of_record_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/wind-project-sites/horns-rev-1
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Tethys states Horns Rev 1 was the first offshore wind farm in the North Sea and the first to use the monopile foundation type; Vattenfall’s 2023 anniversary article also says it was the first with monopile technology.


wind_farm_id: 6425
canonical_id: 41d5e640-fdc5-4a0e-967e-c7ce062ed3b7
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev I
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/03/2001
resolved_value: 01/03/2001
research_value: 29/03/2001
resolved_fact_id: 9952.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/wind-project-sites/horns-rev-1
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Tethys Horns Rev 1 project page
source_of_record_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/wind-project-sites/horns-rev-1
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Tethys provides a specific project timeline entry: “29 Mar 2001: Consent authorized”. A second openly accessible authoritative source with the exact consent date was not found; this single accessible specialist source is used.


wind_farm_id: 6425
canonical_id: 41d5e640-fdc5-4a0e-967e-c7ce062ed3b7
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev I
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 03/01/2001
resolved_value: 03/01/2001
research_value: 03/01/2001
resolved_fact_id: 21552.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://mb.cision.com/Main/18886/2965730/1144997.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vestas stock exchange announcement PDF
source_of_record_url: https://mb.cision.com/Main/18886/2965730/1144997.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
A formal FID date is not clearly published in accessible project sources. As the nearest documentable commitment milestone, Vestas’ 03/01/2001 stock exchange announcement says Elsam would initiate concluding negotiations for the turbine supply and identifies the chosen turbine and project plan; this is used as a low-confidence proxy for FID timing, and should be treated cautiously.


wind_farm_id: 6425
canonical_id: 41d5e640-fdc5-4a0e-967e-c7ce062ed3b7
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev I
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 29/07/2002
resolved_value: 29/07/2002
research_value: 29/07/2002
resolved_fact_id: 9953.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/wind-project-sites/horns-rev-1
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Tethys Horns Rev 1 project page
source_of_record_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/wind-project-sites/horns-rev-1
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Tethys timeline states “29 Jul 2002: First turbine begins generating power”. A second accessible source with the exact date was not located.


wind_farm_id: 6425
canonical_id: 41d5e640-fdc5-4a0e-967e-c7ce062ed3b7
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev I
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2002-12-01
resolved_value: 2002-12-01
research_value: 11/12/2002
resolved_fact_id: 9794.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Tethys Horns Rev 1 project page
research_source_type: open project database
research_source_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/wind-project-sites/horns-rev-1
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Tethys timeline gives “11 Dec 2002: Horns Rev I was fully commissioned”. Vattenfall’s current plant page says the wind farm “was inaugurated in 2002,” which supports 2002 completion but not the exact day; Tethys is the source of record for the exact date.


wind_farm_id: 6426
canonical_id: a004346d-6ae5-4e54-bbd9-c1fd9da3accc
wind_farm_name: Anholt
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Anholt Offshore Wind Farm (Danish: Anholt Havmøllepark)
research_value: Anholt Offshore Wind Farm (Danish: Anholt Havmøllepark)
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted project summary PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://orsted.com/-/media/www/docs/corp/com/our-business/wind-power/wind-farm-project-summary/anholt_uk_2018.ashx?hash=7707175e111c65a4aefc353291091ee4&la=en

research_summary:
Danish Energy Agency lists Anholt (2013) among established offshore wind farms; Ørsted’s Anholt project summary uses Anholt Offshore Wind Farm.

source_of_record_url:
https://orsted.com/-/media/www/docs/corp/com/our-business/wind-power/wind-farm-project-summary/anholt_uk_2018.ashx?hash=7707175e111c65a4aefc353291091ee4&la=en


wind_farm_id: 6426
canonical_id: a004346d-6ae5-4e54-bbd9-c1fd9da3accc
wind_farm_name: Anholt
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 40899.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://aipmanagement.dk/investments/anholt/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: AIP Anholt asset page
source_of_record_url: https://aipmanagement.dk/investments/anholt/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: DONG Energy (now Ørsted). Current owners: Ørsted 50%, PensionDanmark 30%, AIP-managed fund/PKA stake 20%. Operator: Ørsted.

resolved_value:
Developer: DONG Energy (now Ørsted). Current owners: Ørsted 50%, PensionDanmark 30%, AIP-managed fund/PKA stake 20%. Operator: Ørsted.

research_summary:
Freshest ownership signal used: AIP asset page crawled 08/05/2026 shows AIP 20%, PensionDanmark 30%, Ørsted 50%; PensionDanmark 2023 annual report confirms its 30% holding; Ørsted current portfolio page confirms its 50% ownership share. Operator is described by PensionDanmark/Ørsted materials as Ørsted/DONG operating the farm.


wind_farm_id: 6426
canonical_id: a004346d-6ae5-4e54-bbd9-c1fd9da3accc
wind_farm_name: Anholt
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted project summary PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
DONG Energy originally developed the project and sold 50% in 03/2011 to PensionDanmark (30%) and PKA (20%); current visible ownership presentation is Ørsted 50%, PensionDanmark 30%, AIP-managed 20%

research_value:
DONG Energy originally developed the project and sold 50% in 03/2011 to PensionDanmark (30%) and PKA (20%); current visible ownership presentation is Ørsted 50%, PensionDanmark 30%, AIP-managed 20%

citation_url:
https://orsted.com/-/media/www/docs/corp/com/our-business/wind-power/wind-farm-project-summary/anholt_uk_2018.ashx?hash=7707175e111c65a4aefc353291091ee4&la=en

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on for current structure is the AIP live asset page; historical transfer is corroborated by older DONG/industry sources that state the 2011 sale of 50% to PensionDanmark and PKA. The current 20% interest appears presented today through AIP management, so this is treated as the current owner presentation without assuming a different underlying legal asset than the historic PKA stake.


wind_farm_id: 6426
canonical_id: a004346d-6ae5-4e54-bbd9-c1fd9da3accc
wind_farm_name: Anholt
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 40900.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency established offshore wind farms
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Newer authoritative sources support operation: Danish Energy Agency lists Anholt among existing offshore wind farms; Ørsted’s 2025 annual report refers to Anholt Offshore Wind Farm (DK) stepping out of subsidy, which confirms an operating asset rather than a development project.


wind_farm_id: 6426
canonical_id: a004346d-6ae5-4e54-bbd9-c1fd9da3accc
wind_farm_name: Anholt
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 399.6 MW
resolved_value: 399.6 MW
research_value: 399.6 MW
resolved_fact_id: 40901.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency established offshore wind farms
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Danish Energy Agency gives 399.6 MW and 111 turbines; AIP rounds this to 400 MW. Chosen value is the more precise regulator figure.


wind_farm_id: 6426
canonical_id: a004346d-6ae5-4e54-bbd9-c1fd9da3accc
wind_farm_name: Anholt
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency established offshore wind farms
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Publicly accessible sources reviewed consistently state installed capacity around 399.6/400 MW, but no clearly project-specific open source located in this pass stated a distinct MEC/export limit. Gross installed capacity should not be silently substituted for MEC.


wind_farm_id: 6426
canonical_id: a004346d-6ae5-4e54-bbd9-c1fd9da3accc
wind_farm_name: Anholt
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens SWT-3.6-120
resolved_value: Siemens SWT-3.6-120
research_value: Siemens SWT-3.6-120
resolved_fact_id: 40902.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://orsted.com/en/offshore-wind/our-offshore-wind-farms
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted offshore wind farms portfolio
source_of_record_url: https://orsted.com/en/offshore-wind/our-offshore-wind-farms
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Ørsted’s current offshore wind farm portfolio page for Anholt states Wind turbine capacity: 3.6 MW and Rotor diameter: 120 metres for 111 turbines; together these support the project-specific model notation SWT-3.6-120 without relying on the blocked news page.


wind_farm_id: 6426
canonical_id: a004346d-6ae5-4e54-bbd9-c1fd9da3accc
wind_farm_name: Anholt
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 120
resolved_value: 120
research_value: 120 m
resolved_fact_id: 9485.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Ørsted offshore wind farms portfolio
research_source_type: owner/operator
research_source_url: https://orsted.com/en/offshore-wind/our-offshore-wind-farms
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Ørsted’s current Anholt portfolio entry explicitly gives Rotor diameter: 120 metres, providing a project-specific owner source and removing the need for the blocked news page.


wind_farm_id: 6426
canonical_id: a004346d-6ae5-4e54-bbd9-c1fd9da3accc
wind_farm_name: Anholt
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 81.6
resolved_value: 81.6
research_value: 81.6 m
resolved_fact_id: 9640.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources reviewed did not clearly and accessibly state hub height. Per the required rule, the linked EuroWindWakes project turbine metadata fallback was used: 81.6 m. Supporting project sources confirm the same turbine platform but not the hub height.


wind_farm_id: 6426
canonical_id: a004346d-6ae5-4e54-bbd9-c1fd9da3accc
wind_farm_name: Anholt
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 111
resolved_value: 111
research_value: 111
resolved_fact_id: 48482.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 111 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Danish Energy Agency established offshore wind farms
research_source_type: regulator
research_source_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Danish Energy Agency and AIP both state 111 turbines. This aligns with the EMODnet hint of 111 and differs from the linked EuroWindWakes calculated count of 70, which likely reflects incomplete linked turbine locations rather than the full built farm.


wind_farm_id: 6426
canonical_id: a004346d-6ae5-4e54-bbd9-c1fd9da3accc
wind_farm_name: Anholt
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile
resolved_value: Monopile
research_value: Monopile
resolved_fact_id: 40908.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.cswoffshore.com/references/foundations-references/anholt/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: CS Wind Offshore reference page
source_of_record_url: https://www.cswoffshore.com/references/foundations-references/anholt/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
CS Wind Offshore states 111 transition pieces and 111 monopiles for Anholt; Tethys/related materials also refer to foundation monopile and scour-protected monopile locations.


wind_farm_id: 6426
canonical_id: a004346d-6ae5-4e54-bbd9-c1fd9da3accc
wind_farm_name: Anholt
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/07/2010
resolved_value: 01/07/2010
research_value: 01/07/2010
resolved_fact_id: 40909.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://orsted.com/en/company-announcement-list/2010/06/956747
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted company announcement
source_of_record_url: https://orsted.com/en/company-announcement-list/2010/06/956747
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Accessible sources found show DONG/Ørsted won the project in early July 2010; I did not find an open regulator page in this pass that cleanly states the formal construction consent issue date as a separate milestone, so this row uses the project award/concession timing at month level and notes the nuance.


wind_farm_id: 6426
canonical_id: a004346d-6ae5-4e54-bbd9-c1fd9da3accc
wind_farm_name: Anholt
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/01/2011
resolved_value: 01/01/2011
research_value: 01/01/2011
resolved_fact_id: 40910.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://aipmanagement.dk/investments/anholt/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: AIP Anholt asset page
source_of_record_url: https://aipmanagement.dk/investments/anholt/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
AIP lists Investment 2011 for Anholt. Public open sources reviewed did not provide a cleaner project-specific FID date, so month/day is not confirmed; table normalized to 01/01/2011 under the year-only rule.


wind_farm_id: 6426
canonical_id: a004346d-6ae5-4e54-bbd9-c1fd9da3accc
wind_farm_name: Anholt
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2013-09-01
resolved_value: 2013-09-01
research_value: 19/06/2013
resolved_fact_id: 9795.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Offshore Wind news
research_source_type: industry news
research_source_url: https://www.offshorewind.biz/2013/06/20/denmark-all-turbines-at-anholt-owf-now-operational/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Offshore Wind reports the last of the 111 turbines was connected to the grid on 19 June 2013; DONG Energy H1 2013 results say Anholt: All turbines producing in June 2013. Official inauguration followed later in September 2013, but full commissioning/power production was reached in June.


wind_farm_id: 6427
canonical_id: 7c0943ac-6a53-48b5-98e8-de960b94c475
wind_farm_name: Middelgrunden
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Middelgrunden Havvindmøllepark / Middelgrunden Wind Farm
research_value: Middelgrunden Havvindmøllepark / Middelgrunden Wind Farm
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/6685/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency permit extension for turbines 1-10
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/6685/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official/current project naming on the cooperative and Danish Energy Agency permit documents is Middelgrunden Havvindmøllepark. English-language sources also use Middelgrunden Wind Farm. No phase split was found for the built asset.


wind_farm_id: 6427
canonical_id: 7c0943ac-6a53-48b5-98e8-de960b94c475
wind_farm_name: Middelgrunden
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 40913.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/6685/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency permit extension for turbines 1-10
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/6685/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developed by Copenhagen Energy and Middelgrunden Wind Turbine Cooperative; current owners are HOFOR (50%, turbines 1-10) and Middelgrunden Wind Turbine Cooperative (50%, turbines 11-20); operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developed by Copenhagen Energy and Middelgrunden Wind Turbine Cooperative; current owners are HOFOR (50%, turbines 1-10) and Middelgrunden Wind Turbine Cooperative (50%, turbines 11-20); operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
The cooperative site states 10 northern turbines are owned by Ørsted in its older undated project page, but newer dated sources supersede this. DEA permit decisions dated 26/06/2025 show turbines 1-10 are owned by HOFOR and turbines 11-20 by the cooperative; HOFOR’s 2025 project page confirms HOFOR bought the northern 10 turbines from Ørsted in 2018. Freshest ownership evidence relied on: DEA/HOFOR dated 26/06/2025 and HOFOR 2025 page. A distinct named operator separate from the owners was not clearly confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6427
canonical_id: 7c0943ac-6a53-48b5-98e8-de960b94c475
wind_farm_name: Middelgrunden
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/6685/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency permit extension for turbines 1-10
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/6685/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Originally split between Copenhagen Energy and Middelgrunden Wind Turbine Cooperative; Copenhagen Energy’s 10 turbines later passed to Energy E2/Ørsted; HOFOR took back turbines 1-10 on 06/11/2018; current split 50/50 HOFOR and cooperative

research_value:
Originally split between Copenhagen Energy and Middelgrunden Wind Turbine Cooperative; Copenhagen Energy’s 10 turbines later passed to Energy E2/Ørsted; HOFOR took back turbines 1-10 on 06/11/2018; current split 50/50 HOFOR and cooperative

research_summary:
The 2005 project paper describes a cooperation with Copenhagen Energy at development. Offshore Energy reports the municipal utility’s 10 turbines were sold in 2003 to Energie E2, later Ørsted; DEA’s dated 26/06/2025 permit states the transfer of permits for turbines 1-10 to HOFOR was approved on 06/11/2018. Freshest source date relied on for current structure: 26/06/2025 DEA decisions.


wind_farm_id: 6427
canonical_id: 7c0943ac-6a53-48b5-98e8-de960b94c475
wind_farm_name: Middelgrunden
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 40914.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/6685/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency permit extension for turbines 1-10
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/6685/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The wind farm is operating and received a 25-year electricity production permit extension in June 2025. Although HOFOR notes the economics must be recalculated before the long-term future is fully clarified, the asset remains an operating wind farm with valid permits through 31/12/2050 for both ownership halves.


wind_farm_id: 6427
canonical_id: 7c0943ac-6a53-48b5-98e8-de960b94c475
wind_farm_name: Middelgrunden
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 40 MW
resolved_value: 40 MW
research_value: 40 MW
resolved_fact_id: 40915.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: HOFOR Middelgrunden life-extension page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.hofor.dk/baeredygtige-byer/vind-og-sol/nye-vind-og-solprojekter-paa-vej/nyt-liv-til-havvindmoeller-paa-middelgrunden/

research_summary:
Multiple sources agree the wind farm comprises 20 turbines of 2 MW each, giving 40 MW total installed capacity.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.hofor.dk/baeredygtige-byer/vind-og-sol/nye-vind-og-solprojekter-paa-vej/nyt-liv-til-havvindmoeller-paa-middelgrunden/


wind_farm_id: 6427
canonical_id: 7c0943ac-6a53-48b5-98e8-de960b94c475
wind_farm_name: Middelgrunden
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/6685/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency permit extension for turbines 1-10
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/6685/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Publicly accessible project-specific sources reviewed here confirm installed capacity and grid-connection context, but not a separate explicitly stated project MEC/export-capacity figure for the full wind farm. The DEA permit confirms grid connection is required, but does not state a project MEC value.


wind_farm_id: 6427
canonical_id: 7c0943ac-6a53-48b5-98e8-de960b94c475
wind_farm_name: Middelgrunden
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Bonus B76/2000
resolved_value: Bonus B76/2000
research_value: Bonus B76/2000
resolved_fact_id: 40916.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
HOFOR confirms Bonus 76 turbines at Middelgrunden. Project-specific web sources do not clearly spell out the slash-format model designation, so the linked EuroWindWakes dataset value B76/2000 was used as the required fallback for the exact model string.


wind_farm_id: 6427
canonical_id: 7c0943ac-6a53-48b5-98e8-de960b94c475
wind_farm_name: Middelgrunden
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 76
resolved_value: 76
research_value: 76 m
resolved_fact_id: 9486.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: 2002 Middelgrunden case paper
research_source_type: cooperative-hosted pdf
research_source_url: https://www.middelgrunden.dk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/artikel_4.pdf
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Repaired to an accessible project-specific cooperative-hosted case paper that explicitly lists “Rotor diameter 76 meter”; HOFOR’s “Bonus 76” wording remains consistent supporting context.


wind_farm_id: 6427
canonical_id: 7c0943ac-6a53-48b5-98e8-de960b94c475
wind_farm_name: Middelgrunden
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 64
resolved_value: 64
research_value: 64 m
resolved_fact_id: 9641.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific accessible web sources reviewed here gave total height (102 m in the cooperative-hosted case paper; 105 m in HOFOR 2025 page) rather than a clearly stated hub height. Per the required rule, the linked EuroWindWakes dataset fallback was used for hub height: 64 m.


wind_farm_id: 6427
canonical_id: 7c0943ac-6a53-48b5-98e8-de960b94c475
wind_farm_name: Middelgrunden
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 20
resolved_value: 20
research_value: 20
resolved_fact_id: 48483.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 20 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Danish Energy Agency permit extension for turbines 1-10
research_source_type: regulator pdf
research_source_url: https://ens.dk/media/6685/download
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Multiple web sources confirm 20 turbines. This aligns with all provided non-web validation signals: EuroWindWakes linked-turbine count 20 and EMODnet hint 20, so there is no count conflict to resolve.


wind_farm_id: 6427
canonical_id: 7c0943ac-6a53-48b5-98e8-de960b94c475
wind_farm_name: Middelgrunden
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Concrete gravity-base foundations
resolved_value: Concrete gravity-base foundations
research_value: Concrete gravity-base foundations
resolved_fact_id: 40922.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.middelgrunden.dk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/artikel_4.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: 2002 Middelgrunden case paper
source_of_record_url: https://www.middelgrunden.dk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/artikel_4.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Repaired to an accessible project-specific cooperative-hosted case paper that states placement of “gravity foundations”; the MDPI technical review remains consistent secondary support that Middelgrunden used gravity-based foundations.


wind_farm_id: 6427
canonical_id: 7c0943ac-6a53-48b5-98e8-de960b94c475
wind_farm_name: Middelgrunden
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 13/12/1999
resolved_value: 13/12/1999
research_value: 13/12/1999
resolved_fact_id: 40923.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/6685/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency permit extension for turbines 1-10
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/6685/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
DEA’s 2025 permit documents for both ownership halves state the establishment permit was granted on 13 December 1999.


wind_farm_id: 6427
canonical_id: 7c0943ac-6a53-48b5-98e8-de960b94c475
wind_farm_name: Middelgrunden
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/12/1999
resolved_value: 01/12/1999
research_value: 01/12/1999
resolved_fact_id: 40924.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.middelgrunden.dk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/artikel_4.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: 2002 Middelgrunden case paper
source_of_record_url: https://www.middelgrunden.dk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/artikel_4.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
An explicit FID label was not found in accessible project sources. The closest project-specific milestone remains “Contracts signed December 1999” in an accessible cooperative-hosted Middelgrunden case paper; this is used as the nearest FID-equivalent, normalized to 01/12/1999 because only month/year is confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6427
canonical_id: 7c0943ac-6a53-48b5-98e8-de960b94c475
wind_farm_name: Middelgrunden
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/12/2000
resolved_value: 01/12/2000
research_value: 01/12/2000
resolved_fact_id: 40925.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.middelgrunden.dk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/artikel_4.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: 2002 Middelgrunden case paper
source_of_record_url: https://www.middelgrunden.dk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/artikel_4.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Repaired to accessible project-specific cooperative-hosted sources. One case paper states “First turbines start production December 2000”; a cooperative brochure states “The first turbine started production at the end of December 2000”. Exact day remains unconfirmed, so the normalized value stays 01/12/2000.


wind_farm_id: 6427
canonical_id: 7c0943ac-6a53-48b5-98e8-de960b94c475
wind_farm_name: Middelgrunden
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2001-03-01
resolved_value: 2001-03-01
research_value: 01/03/2001
resolved_fact_id: 9796.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: OffshoreWind.biz lifetime-extension article
research_source_type: industry news
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
A current dated industry source states full commissioning was in March 2001; the linked EuroWindWakes context also supports 01/03/2001, so 01/03/2001 is used.

research_source_url:
https://www.offshorewind.biz/2025/06/27/25-year-old-danish-offshore-wind-farm-gets-approval-to-operate-for-25-more-years/


wind_farm_id: 6429
canonical_id: f21b064e-e560-4a47-9100-88603a9525ab
wind_farm_name: Frederikshavn Offshore
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – Existing offshore wind farms
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Frederikshavn Offshore; also referred to in official Danish sources as Frederikshavn havvindmøllepark (2003)

research_value:
Frederikshavn Offshore; also referred to in official Danish sources as Frederikshavn havvindmøllepark (2003)

research_summary:
Identity resolved against similarly named later project: the Danish Energy Agency’s operating-offshore-wind-farms page identifies Frederikshavn (2003) as a 3-turbine project, while a separate 26/10/2022 DEA press release concerns a 72 MW later project with up to five turbines.


wind_farm_id: 6429
canonical_id: f21b064e-e560-4a47-9100-88603a9525ab
wind_farm_name: Frederikshavn Offshore
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Developer: Elsam A/S; current owner(s): Not confirmed; operator: Not confirmed
resolved_value: Developer: Elsam A/S; current owner(s): Not confirmed; operator: Not confirmed
research_value: Developer: Elsam A/S; current owner(s): Not confirmed; operator: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 40927.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/2567/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency consent PDF, 16/02/2002
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/2567/download
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The 16/02/2002 consent states Elsam was builder and responsible for construction and operation. Fresher openly accessible web evidence for the current owner/operator of the 2003 project was not found. A later Ørsted/DONG item found in search results refers to the offshore wind demonstration site lease, but the live page was inaccessible and appears related to later test-site use rather than clearly proving current ownership of the 2003 built asset. Freshest dated source relied on for developer is 16/02/2002.


wind_farm_id: 6429
canonical_id: f21b064e-e560-4a47-9100-88603a9525ab
wind_farm_name: Frederikshavn Offshore
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Elsam A/S developed and originally owned/built the project; later ownership history Not confirmed
research_value: Elsam A/S developed and originally owned/built the project; later ownership history Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/2567/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency consent PDF, 16/02/2002
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/2567/download
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The 16/02/2002 consent says “Elsam A/S er entreprenør og ejer af møllerne” and is responsible for construction and operation. I did not find two accessible authoritative sources that reconcile any later transfer history for this exact 2003 asset. Freshest source date relied on here remains 16/02/2002 for original ownership only.


wind_farm_id: 6429
canonical_id: f21b064e-e560-4a47-9100-88603a9525ab
wind_farm_name: Frederikshavn Offshore
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 40928.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – Existing offshore wind farms
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
DEA lists Frederikshavn among existing offshore wind farms and states the park dates from 2003. DEA also notes that two of the offshore wind turbines are today land-based, so the asset is operational but with a notable physical-status nuance.


wind_farm_id: 6429
canonical_id: f21b064e-e560-4a47-9100-88603a9525ab
wind_farm_name: Frederikshavn Offshore
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 7.6 MW
resolved_value: 7.6 MW
research_value: 7.6 MW
resolved_fact_id: 40929.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – Existing offshore wind farms
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official DEA source states total effect 7.6 MW for the 2003 project: one 3 MW turbine plus two 2.3 MW turbines. This conflicts with the fallback database context value of 10.6 MW; web evidence supports 7.6 MW for the exact 2003 project.


wind_farm_id: 6429
canonical_id: f21b064e-e560-4a47-9100-88603a9525ab
wind_farm_name: Frederikshavn Offshore
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 12 MVA grid connection
resolved_value: 12 MVA grid connection
research_value: 12 MVA grid connection
resolved_fact_id: 40930.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/2567/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency consent PDF, 16/02/2002
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/2567/download
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Hard-to-source field. The 16/02/2002 consent states a planned “10 kV / 12 MVA kabel” from the turbines to a new 60/10 kV station. This is the closest accessible project-specific export/grid-capacity evidence found; I did not find a later source restating an as-built MEC in MW.


wind_farm_id: 6429
canonical_id: f21b064e-e560-4a47-9100-88603a9525ab
wind_farm_name: Frederikshavn Offshore
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Mixed site: 1 × Vestas V90/3000; 1 × Nordex N90/2300; 1 × Bonus B82/2300
resolved_value: Mixed site: 1 × Vestas V90/3000; 1 × Nordex N90/2300; 1 × Bonus B82/2300
research_value: Mixed site: 1 × Vestas V90/3000; 1 × Nordex N90/2300; 1 × Bonus B82/2300
resolved_fact_id: 40931.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.thewindpower.net/windfarm_en_10669_frederikshavn-offshore.php
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: The Wind Power – Frederikshavn Offshore
source_of_record_url: https://www.thewindpower.net/windfarm_en_10669_frederikshavn-offshore.php
source_of_record_licence: website terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources indicate Frederikshavn was a mixed demonstration site. DEA confirms one 3 MW turbine and two 2.3 MW turbines; secondary project listings identify the three models. This conflicts with the linked EuroWindWakes fallback that gives a single model (Bonus B82/2300) for the linked turbine metadata. Because project-specific web evidence indicates a mixed as-built site, the table uses the mixed-model interpretation.


wind_farm_id: 6429
canonical_id: f21b064e-e560-4a47-9100-88603a9525ab
wind_farm_name: Frederikshavn Offshore
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Bonus (1), Nordex (1), Vestas (1)
resolved_value: Bonus (1), Nordex (1), Vestas (1)
research_value: Mixed site: Vestas, Nordex, Bonus
resolved_fact_id: 9022.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: The Wind Power – Frederikshavn Offshore
research_source_type: open industry database
research_source_url: https://www.thewindpower.net/windfarm_en_10669_frederikshavn-offshore.php
research_source_licence: website terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Same identity issue as turbine model. Project-specific web evidence supports a mixed-OEM demonstration site rather than a single-OEM farm.


wind_farm_id: 6429
canonical_id: f21b064e-e560-4a47-9100-88603a9525ab
wind_farm_name: Frederikshavn Offshore
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 90 (2), 82 (1)
resolved_value: 90 (2), 82 (1)
research_value: Not confirmed (project-level mixed site)
resolved_fact_id: 9487.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: The Wind Power – Frederikshavn Offshore
research_source_type: open industry database
research_source_url: https://www.thewindpower.net/windfarm_en_10669_frederikshavn-offshore.php
research_source_licence: website terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Web evidence supports a mixed turbine site, but I did not find an official accessible project page listing all three as-built rotor diameters together. The linked EuroWindWakes fallback gives 82 m tied to Bonus B82/2300; because project-specific web sources indicate the site used multiple turbine models, that single-value fallback does not cleanly represent the whole project.


wind_farm_id: 6429
canonical_id: f21b064e-e560-4a47-9100-88603a9525ab
wind_farm_name: Frederikshavn Offshore
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 70
resolved_value: 70
research_value: 70 m
resolved_fact_id: 9642.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources for the mixed site did not yield a clean official project-level hub-height value. Per the required fallback rule, I therefore use the linked EuroWindWakes 2025 turbine metadata value 70 m, explicitly as dataset fallback.


wind_farm_id: 6429
canonical_id: f21b064e-e560-4a47-9100-88603a9525ab
wind_farm_name: Frederikshavn Offshore
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 3
resolved_value: 3
research_value: 3
resolved_fact_id: 48484.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 3 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Danish Energy Agency – Existing offshore wind farms
research_source_type: government
research_source_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
DEA states 3 offshore wind turbines were erected in 2003. This aligns with the provided non-web validation signals: database candidate 3, EuroWindWakes linked count 3, and EMODnet hint 3.


wind_farm_id: 6429
canonical_id: f21b064e-e560-4a47-9100-88603a9525ab
wind_farm_name: Frederikshavn Offshore
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 40937.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Aalborg University – prototype bucket foundation at Frederikshavn
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Mixed / not fully confirmed; at least one suction bucket / caisson foundation prototype, others Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Mixed / not fully confirmed; at least one suction bucket / caisson foundation prototype, others Not confirmed

citation_url:
https://vbn.aau.dk/en/publications/prototype-bucket-foundation-for-wind-turbines-natural-frequency-e

research_summary:
The 2002 consent says final foundation choice depended on bids, so it does not confirm as-built types. Later engineering literature and geotechnical references tie at least one Frederikshavn turbine to a bucket / suction caisson prototype installed in 10/2002. I did not find sufficiently authoritative accessible evidence confirming foundation type for all three turbines, so the overall project foundation row remains mixed/partly confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://vbn.aau.dk/en/publications/prototype-bucket-foundation-for-wind-turbines-natural-frequency-e


wind_farm_id: 6429
canonical_id: f21b064e-e560-4a47-9100-88603a9525ab
wind_farm_name: Frederikshavn Offshore
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 16/02/2002
resolved_value: 16/02/2002
research_value: 16/02/2002
resolved_fact_id: 40938.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/2567/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency consent PDF, 16/02/2002
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/2567/download
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The DEA consent document is dated 16 February 2002 and is the clearest accessible consent milestone.


wind_farm_id: 6429
canonical_id: f21b064e-e560-4a47-9100-88603a9525ab
wind_farm_name: Frederikshavn Offshore
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/2567/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency consent PDF, 16/02/2002
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/2567/download
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I did not find an accessible authoritative source explicitly identifying an FID date for this early demonstration project.


wind_farm_id: 6429
canonical_id: f21b064e-e560-4a47-9100-88603a9525ab
wind_farm_name: Frederikshavn Offshore
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/06/2003
resolved_value: 01/06/2003
research_value: 01/06/2003
resolved_fact_id: 40939.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Exact first-power evidence was not found on accessible official pages. A month-level commissioning signal exists in the linked EuroWindWakes context (June 2003), so per the date-normalization rule I use 01/06/2003 as dataset fallback and note it is month-level rather than a day-certain first-power source.


wind_farm_id: 6429
canonical_id: f21b064e-e560-4a47-9100-88603a9525ab
wind_farm_name: Frederikshavn Offshore
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2003-06-01
resolved_value: 2003-06-01
research_value: 01/06/2003
resolved_fact_id: 9797.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
DEA identifies the project as from 2003; the linked EuroWindWakes metadata gives commissioning date in June 2003. Using the required normalization rule for month-level evidence, the table shows 01/06/2003.


wind_farm_id: 6430
canonical_id: 16417bd3-a1e4-49de-92ca-e0497721774f
wind_farm_name: Nissum Bredning
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/2912/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency establishment permit
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/2912/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Nissum Bredning; project company I/S Nissum Bredning Vind; development/test-project name “Nissum Bredning - Testbed for new technologies and integrated design”

research_value:
Nissum Bredning; project company I/S Nissum Bredning Vind; development/test-project name “Nissum Bredning - Testbed for new technologies and integrated design”

research_summary:
The Danish Energy Agency and Siemens Gamesa both tie the built 28 MW offshore project to Nissum Bredning. The record also has a historic company/name nuance: the permitting file says the applicant changed from Nissum Bredning Vindmøllelaug I/S to I/S Nissum Bredning Vind in 2016.


wind_farm_id: 6430
canonical_id: 16417bd3-a1e4-49de-92ca-e0497721774f
wind_farm_name: Nissum Bredning
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 40941.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer/promoter: I/S Nissum Bredning Vind; equity partners: Nissum Bredning Vindmøllerlaug I/S 55% and Jysk Energi A/S 45%; operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer/promoter: I/S Nissum Bredning Vind; equity partners: Nissum Bredning Vindmøllerlaug I/S 55% and Jysk Energi A/S 45%; operator: Not confirmed

citation_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/press-releases/180619_SGRE_OF_Denmark_Nissum-Bredning_EN_final.html

research_summary:
The dead 2016 technical-report source was replaced. The accessible authoritative support now comes from the Danish Energy Agency permit confirming the project company I/S Nissum Bredning Vind and Siemens Gamesa’s 19/06/2018 release stating the project was producing power for customers Nissum Bredning Vindmøllelaug and Jysk Energi. I did not find a newer accessible official page restating the exact 55% / 45% split, so the historical split is retained as previously reported but supported here through the surviving authoritative owner naming rather than the dead PDF; operator remains not confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/press-releases/180619_SGRE_OF_Denmark_Nissum-Bredning_EN_final.html


wind_farm_id: 6430
canonical_id: 16417bd3-a1e4-49de-92ca-e0497721774f
wind_farm_name: Nissum Bredning
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/2912/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency establishment permit
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/2912/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Original local applicant/developer vehicle: Nissum Bredning Vindmøllelaug I/S; approved project vehicle from 2016: I/S Nissum Bredning Vind; supported ownership split 55% Nissum Bredning Vindmøllerlaug I/S / 45% Jysk Energi A/S

research_value:
Original local applicant/developer vehicle: Nissum Bredning Vindmøllelaug I/S; approved project vehicle from 2016: I/S Nissum Bredning Vind; supported ownership split 55% Nissum Bredning Vindmøllerlaug I/S / 45% Jysk Energi A/S

research_summary:
Freshest dated source relied on for ownership remains the Siemens Gamesa project communication dated 19/06/2018. The Danish Energy Agency permit dated 28/02/2017 confirms a company change from Nissum Bredning Vindmøllelaug I/S to I/S Nissum Bredning Vind. I found no newer authoritative public source showing a revised ownership split, so no later transfer is confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6430
canonical_id: 16417bd3-a1e4-49de-92ca-e0497721774f
wind_farm_name: Nissum Bredning
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 40942.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/press-releases/180619_SGRE_OF_Denmark_Nissum-Bredning_EN_final.html

research_summary:
The project was expected ready in 01/2018 per the Danish Energy Agency, Siemens Gamesa said it was fully operational and producing power since early 2018 on 19/06/2018, and DNV’s 22/05/2019 certification says the project certification covered the project through commissioning.


wind_farm_id: 6430
canonical_id: 16417bd3-a1e4-49de-92ca-e0497721774f
wind_farm_name: Nissum Bredning
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 28 MW
resolved_value: 28 MW
research_value: 28 MW
resolved_fact_id: 40943.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/presse/nissum-bredning-vind-faar-elproduktionstilladelse-til-4-havvindmoeller
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency production licence notice
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/presse/nissum-bredning-vind-faar-elproduktionstilladelse-til-4-havvindmoeller
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Consistently stated across Danish Energy Agency permiting material, Siemens Gamesa, and DNV as a 28 MW project.


wind_farm_id: 6430
canonical_id: 16417bd3-a1e4-49de-92ca-e0497721774f
wind_farm_name: Nissum Bredning
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 28 MW
resolved_value: 28 MW
research_value: 28 MW
resolved_fact_id: 40944.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/2912/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency establishment permit
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/2912/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The establishment permit explicitly says the project may build 4 offshore turbines with a maximum output of 28 MW measured at the point of connection. No better open source was found distinguishing a lower export capacity from installed capacity, so MEC is best evidenced as 28 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6430
canonical_id: 16417bd3-a1e4-49de-92ca-e0497721774f
wind_farm_name: Nissum Bredning
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: SWT-7.0-154
resolved_value: SWT-7.0-154
research_value: SWT-7.0-154
resolved_fact_id: 40945.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web evidence is clear: the Siemens technical report states SWT-7.0-154 WTGs, and Siemens Gamesa’s 19/06/2018 release says the site uses the first serial-manufactured SWT-7.0-154 turbines. This aligns with the linked EuroWindWakes fallback row.


wind_farm_id: 6430
canonical_id: 16417bd3-a1e4-49de-92ca-e0497721774f
wind_farm_name: Nissum Bredning
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens Gamesa
resolved_value: Siemens Gamesa
research_value: Siemens Gamesa / Siemens Wind Power
resolved_fact_id: 9023.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Siemens Gamesa press release
research_source_type: OEM
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
The project was built by Siemens Wind Power A/S per the technical report, and the operating project is described by Siemens Gamesa as using its SWT-7.0-154 turbines. This aligns with the linked EuroWindWakes fallback row.


wind_farm_id: 6430
canonical_id: 16417bd3-a1e4-49de-92ca-e0497721774f
wind_farm_name: Nissum Bredning
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 7
resolved_value: 7
research_value: 7 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9333.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Siemens Gamesa press release
research_source_type: OEM
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific sources support 7 MW turbines: four turbines for 28 MW and explicit reference to SWT-7.0-154. This also aligns with the linked EuroWindWakes fallback row.


wind_farm_id: 6430
canonical_id: 16417bd3-a1e4-49de-92ca-e0497721774f
wind_farm_name: Nissum Bredning
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 154
resolved_value: 154
research_value: 154 m
resolved_fact_id: 9488.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Siemens Gamesa press release
research_source_type: OEM
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web evidence is sufficient: Siemens technical material explicitly identifies the turbine as SWT-7.0-154 and Siemens Gamesa repeats that model for this site. This aligns with the linked EuroWindWakes fallback row.


wind_farm_id: 6430
canonical_id: 16417bd3-a1e4-49de-92ca-e0497721774f
wind_farm_name: Nissum Bredning
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 120
resolved_value: 120
research_value: 120 m
resolved_fact_id: 9643.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific accessible web sources reviewed did not clearly state hub height. Per the required hierarchy, the linked EuroWindWakes turbine row is therefore used as the mandatory fallback for this turbine-specific field.


wind_farm_id: 6430
canonical_id: 16417bd3-a1e4-49de-92ca-e0497721774f
wind_farm_name: Nissum Bredning
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 4
resolved_value: 4
research_value: 4
resolved_fact_id: 48485.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 4 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Danish Energy Agency production licence notice
research_source_type: regulator
research_source_url: https://ens.dk/presse/nissum-bredning-vind-faar-elproduktionstilladelse-til-4-havvindmoeller
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Strong web evidence supports 4 turbines from the Danish Energy Agency, Siemens technical report, and DNV. This aligns with the EMODnet hint of 4 but differs from the linked EuroWindWakes calculated linked-turbine count of 1, which likely reflects incomplete linked turbine-point coverage rather than actual project scope.


wind_farm_id: 6430
canonical_id: 16417bd3-a1e4-49de-92ca-e0497721774f
wind_farm_name: Nissum Bredning
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Jacket foundations with concrete transition pieces
resolved_value: Jacket foundations with concrete transition pieces
research_value: Jacket foundations with concrete transition pieces
resolved_fact_id: 40951.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DNV press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.dnv.com/news/2019/siemens-gamesa-s-offshore-wind-power-park-nissum-bredning-receives-project-certificate-by-dnv-gl-148739/

research_summary:
DNV states the project integrated jacket foundations with concrete transition pieces. Siemens Gamesa’s 19/06/2018 release likewise lists jacket foundations and concrete transition pieces among the proven technology elements.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.dnv.com/news/2019/siemens-gamesa-s-offshore-wind-power-park-nissum-bredning-receives-project-certificate-by-dnv-gl-148739/


wind_farm_id: 6430
canonical_id: 16417bd3-a1e4-49de-92ca-e0497721774f
wind_farm_name: Nissum Bredning
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 28/02/2017
resolved_value: 28/02/2017
research_value: 28/02/2017
resolved_fact_id: 40952.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/2912/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency establishment permit
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/2912/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The accessible authoritative milestone clearly evidenced is the Danish Energy Agency’s establishment permit dated 28/02/2017. Earlier EIA/consultation steps existed in 2010-2012, but I did not find a clearer single openly accessible final “consent” date better suited to this row than the establishment permit.


wind_farm_id: 6430
canonical_id: 16417bd3-a1e4-49de-92ca-e0497721774f
wind_farm_name: Nissum Bredning
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 08/02/2016
resolved_value: 08/02/2016
research_value: 08/02/2016
resolved_fact_id: 40953.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/2912/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency establishment permit
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/2912/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
A formal FID is not explicitly labeled in the sources I found. The closest authoritative milestone is the Danish Energy Agency’s support award / project approval in February 2016, referenced in the establishment permit and the Siemens technical report. I therefore use 08/02/2016 as the closest evidenced go-ahead date, with this nuance noted.


wind_farm_id: 6430
canonical_id: 16417bd3-a1e4-49de-92ca-e0497721774f
wind_farm_name: Nissum Bredning
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/02/2018
resolved_value: 01/02/2018
research_value: 01/02/2018
resolved_fact_id: 40954.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No open authoritative source reviewed gave an exact day for first export. The Danish Energy Agency said on 20/12/2017 that the project was expected ready in January 2018, while Siemens Gamesa said on 19/06/2018 that it had been producing power since early 2018. Using the normalization rule for month-level evidence, 01/02/2018 is the closest conservative date.


wind_farm_id: 6430
canonical_id: 16417bd3-a1e4-49de-92ca-e0497721774f
wind_farm_name: Nissum Bredning
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2018-03-01
resolved_value: 2018-03-01
research_value: 01/03/2018
resolved_fact_id: 9798.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Siemens Gamesa said on 19/06/2018 that the project was fully operational and producing power since early 2018; DNV’s project certificate in 2019 confirms commissioning had been completed. Because only early-2018 wording is publicly visible in the strongest sources, I normalize to 01/03/2018 as month-level commissioning evidence, which also matches the provided linked EuroWindWakes commissioning-date fallback.


wind_farm_id: 6431
canonical_id: cd705b27-083d-46ba-a0cc-8fea5f7d6937
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev II
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Horns Rev 2 offshore wind farm; alternative styling: Horns Rev II / Horns Rev 2 Offshore Wind Farm
research_value: Horns Rev 2 offshore wind farm; alternative styling: Horns Rev II / Horns Rev 2 Offshore Wind Farm
citation_url: https://orsted.com/en/media/newsroom/news/2019/09/historic-offshore-wind-farm-turns-ten
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted 10-year article
source_of_record_url: https://orsted.com/en/media/newsroom/news/2019/09/historic-offshore-wind-farm-turns-ten
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Ørsted’s project material and anniversary news both identify the project as Horns Rev 2; older technical and monitoring documents also use the Roman-numeral form “Horns Rev II”, so both names refer to the same built phase.


wind_farm_id: 6431
canonical_id: cd705b27-083d-46ba-a0cc-8fea5f7d6937
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev II
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Developer: DONG Energy (now Ørsted). Current owner: Ørsted (100%). Operator: Ørsted
resolved_value: Developer: DONG Energy (now Ørsted). Current owner: Ørsted (100%). Operator: Ørsted
research_value: Developer: DONG Energy (now Ørsted). Current owner: Ørsted (100%). Operator: Ørsted
resolved_fact_id: 40645.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://orsted.com/en/offshore-wind/our-offshore-wind-farms
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted offshore wind farms listing
source_of_record_url: https://orsted.com/en/offshore-wind/our-offshore-wind-farms
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Freshest dated source relied on for current ownership and operating status is Ørsted’s searchable offshore wind farms page, crawled in May 2026 and showing Horns Rev 2 with “Ørsted ownership share: 100%” and “Status: In operation”; a separate Ørsted job posting from January 2026 also refers to delivering “the safe daily operation” of Horns Rev 2. Older inauguration material confirms DONG Energy built and owned the project at commissioning.


wind_farm_id: 6431
canonical_id: cd705b27-083d-46ba-a0cc-8fea5f7d6937
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev II
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Awarded and developed by DONG Energy/ENERGI E2; currently owned and operated by Ørsted (100%)
research_value: Awarded and developed by DONG Energy/ENERGI E2; currently owned and operated by Ørsted (100%)
citation_url: https://www.eib.org/attachments/pipeline/20070322_nts_en.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EIB EIA summary PDF
source_of_record_url: https://www.eib.org/attachments/pipeline/20070322_nts_en.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on for current ownership is the live Ørsted offshore wind farms page surfaced by current search results, which shows Horns Rev 2 with Ørsted ownership share of 100%; January 2026 Ørsted careers material also supports current operational control. Historical sources show the concession was granted to DONG Energy (former ENERGI E2) in 2005 and inauguration material states the wind farm “was constructed and is owned by DONG Energy”. No credible newer official source found indicating any later equity partner or split, so the best-supported current structure remains Ørsted 100%.


wind_farm_id: 6431
canonical_id: cd705b27-083d-46ba-a0cc-8fea5f7d6937
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev II
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 40646.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://orsted.com/en/offshore-wind/our-offshore-wind-farms
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted offshore wind farms listing
source_of_record_url: https://orsted.com/en/offshore-wind/our-offshore-wind-farms
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
A current Ørsted portfolio page lists Horns Rev 2 as “Status: In operation”. January 2026 Ørsted careers material referring to daily operation at Horns Rev 2 supports that the asset remains operational.


wind_farm_id: 6431
canonical_id: cd705b27-083d-46ba-a0cc-8fea5f7d6937
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev II
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 209.3 MW
resolved_value: 209.3 MW
research_value: 209.3 MW
resolved_fact_id: 40647.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.power-technology.com/data-insights/power-plant-profile-horns-rev-2-denmark/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Power Technology profile
source_of_record_url: https://www.power-technology.com/data-insights/power-plant-profile-horns-rev-2-denmark/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Multiple sources support ~209 MW; EMODnet context says 209.3 MW, while Ørsted/DONG materials round to 209 MW. I use 209.3 MW as the more precise installed-capacity figure, with official sources corroborating the project as a 209 MW-class wind farm.


wind_farm_id: 6431
canonical_id: cd705b27-083d-46ba-a0cc-8fea5f7d6937
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev II
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 209 MW
resolved_value: 209 MW
research_value: 209 MW
resolved_fact_id: 40648.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://energinet.dk/media/l2ucbie0/systemplan2009.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Energinet Systemplan 2009 PDF
source_of_record_url: https://energinet.dk/media/l2ucbie0/systemplan2009.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Energinet’s 2009 system plan provides the clearest grid-operator evidence, stating both that Horns Rev 2 was connected in April 2009 at 209 MW and that the project “has a capacity of 209 MW”. The EIA summary discussed a larger earlier concept, so the operational export/grid-connected figure is best treated as 209 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6431
canonical_id: cd705b27-083d-46ba-a0cc-8fea5f7d6937
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev II
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens SWT-2.3-93
resolved_value: Siemens SWT-2.3-93
research_value: Siemens SWT-2.3-93
resolved_fact_id: 40649.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.power-technology.com/data-insights/power-plant-profile-horns-rev-2-denmark/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Power Technology profile
source_of_record_url: https://www.power-technology.com/data-insights/power-plant-profile-horns-rev-2-denmark/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources clearly support the model: Power Technology names SWT-2.3-93 and DONG/Ørsted materials identify Siemens 2.3 MW turbines with 93 m rotor. This aligns with the linked EuroWindWakes fallback row, so no model inference was needed.


wind_farm_id: 6431
canonical_id: cd705b27-083d-46ba-a0cc-8fea5f7d6937
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev II
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens
resolved_value: Siemens
research_value: Siemens
resolved_fact_id: 9024.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Ørsted project summary
research_source_type: owner document
research_source_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
An accessible Ørsted project summary identifies the turbine as “Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy, SWT 2.3-93”. For the commissioning-era project, this supports Siemens as the OEM.

research_source_url:
https://orsted.com/-/media/www/docs/corp/com/our-business/wind-power/wind-farm-project-summary/horns-rev-2_uk_2018.ashx?hash=c2efe01aac0b9706fc81774e5b8c7a3c&la=en


wind_farm_id: 6431
canonical_id: cd705b27-083d-46ba-a0cc-8fea5f7d6937
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev II
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2.3
resolved_value: 2.3
research_value: 2.3 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9334.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Ørsted project summary
research_source_type: owner document
research_source_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
An accessible Ørsted project summary gives “Wind turbine capacity 2.3MW”. This matches project/profile pages and the project’s 91-turbine, 209 MW configuration.

research_source_url:
https://orsted.com/-/media/www/docs/corp/com/our-business/wind-power/wind-farm-project-summary/horns-rev-2_uk_2018.ashx?hash=c2efe01aac0b9706fc81774e5b8c7a3c&la=en


wind_farm_id: 6431
canonical_id: cd705b27-083d-46ba-a0cc-8fea5f7d6937
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev II
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 93
resolved_value: 93
research_value: 93 m
resolved_fact_id: 9489.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: DONG inauguration release
research_source_type: developer press release
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
DONG’s inauguration facts give “Blade diameter (rotor): 93 m”. This is also reflected in project-profile sources and matches the linked EuroWindWakes row.

research_source_url:
https://news.cision.com/dong-energy/r/hrh-crown-prince-frederik-inaugurates-world-s-largest-offshore-wind-farm--horns-rev-2%2Cc447507


wind_farm_id: 6431
canonical_id: cd705b27-083d-46ba-a0cc-8fea5f7d6937
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev II
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 68
resolved_value: 68
research_value: 68 m
resolved_fact_id: 9644.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Public project-specific web evidence on hub height is limited and mainly comes through Ørsted’s project-summary snippet; because project-specific web sourcing is not robustly accessible, I use the linked EuroWindWakes fallback value of 68 m, which also matches the accessible Ørsted summary snippet.


wind_farm_id: 6431
canonical_id: cd705b27-083d-46ba-a0cc-8fea5f7d6937
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev II
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 91
resolved_value: 91
research_value: 91
resolved_fact_id: 48486.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 91 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: DONG inauguration release
research_source_type: developer press release
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Multiple official/project sources state 91 turbines. This aligns with the EMODnet hint of 91 and differs from the 71 linked-turbine validation signal, which likely reflects incomplete linked turbine locations rather than as-built project count.

research_source_url:
https://news.cision.com/dong-energy/r/hrh-crown-prince-frederik-inaugurates-world-s-largest-offshore-wind-farm--horns-rev-2%2Cc447507


wind_farm_id: 6431
canonical_id: cd705b27-083d-46ba-a0cc-8fea5f7d6937
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev II
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile foundations
resolved_value: Monopile foundations
research_value: Monopile foundations
resolved_fact_id: 40655.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.cswoffshore.com/references/foundations-references/horns-rev-2/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: CS Wind Offshore reference
source_of_record_url: https://www.cswoffshore.com/references/foundations-references/horns-rev-2/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific supplier references are clear: CS Wind Offshore states “91 transition pieces and 91 monopiles”, and the Ørsted supplier summary names the foundations supplier JV.


wind_farm_id: 6431
canonical_id: cd705b27-083d-46ba-a0cc-8fea5f7d6937
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev II
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 19/03/2007
resolved_value: 19/03/2007
research_value: 19/03/2007
resolved_fact_id: 40656.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Tethys monitoring record
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://tethys.pnnl.gov/publications/horns-rev-ii-offshore-wind-farm-monitoring-migrating-waterbirds

research_summary:
A Tethys-hosted monitoring publication states the establishment of Horns Rev 2 “was granted by the Department of Energy on the 19th March 2007” based on DONG Energy’s 13/10/2006 application. This is the clearest accessible project-specific consent date found.

source_of_record_url:
https://tethys.pnnl.gov/publications/horns-rev-ii-offshore-wind-farm-monitoring-migrating-waterbirds


wind_farm_id: 6431
canonical_id: cd705b27-083d-46ba-a0cc-8fea5f7d6937
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev II
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/05/2007
resolved_value: 01/05/2007
research_value: 01/05/2007
resolved_fact_id: 40657.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DONG/GlobeNewswire announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2007/05/01/73720/0/en/DONG-Energy-to-proceed-with-Horns-Rev-2.html

research_summary:
DONG Energy announced “to proceed with Horns Rev 2” on 01/05/2007; that is the clearest accessible FID-equivalent investment-approval milestone found.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2007/05/01/73720/0/en/DONG-Energy-to-proceed-with-Horns-Rev-2.html


wind_farm_id: 6431
canonical_id: cd705b27-083d-46ba-a0cc-8fea5f7d6937
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev II
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/04/2009
resolved_value: 01/04/2009
research_value: 01/04/2009
resolved_fact_id: 40658.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://energinet.dk/media/l2ucbie0/systemplan2009.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Energinet Systemplan 2009 PDF
source_of_record_url: https://energinet.dk/media/l2ucbie0/systemplan2009.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Energinet’s 2009 system plan says Horns Rev 2 “was connected in April 2009”, which is the best accessible first-power/grid-connection evidence. Some sources only state 2009 or September 2009 operation/inauguration, so April 2009 is the best-supported first power milestone.


wind_farm_id: 6431
canonical_id: cd705b27-083d-46ba-a0cc-8fea5f7d6937
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev II
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2010-01-01
resolved_value: 2010-01-01
research_value: 17/09/2009
resolved_fact_id: 9799.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: DONG inauguration release
research_source_type: developer press release
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Official inauguration occurred on 17/09/2009, and project/profile sources treat September 2009 as commercial operation/full completion timing.

research_source_url:
https://news.cision.com/dong-energy/r/hrh-crown-prince-frederik-inaugurates-world-s-largest-offshore-wind-farm--horns-rev-2%2Cc447507


wind_farm_id: 6432
canonical_id: 17546aff-b313-46eb-bc76-5ef08605a2d5
wind_farm_name: Kriegers Flak K2-K3
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Kriegers Flak offshore wind farm (alternative / historic name: Kriegers Flak K2-K3)
research_value: Kriegers Flak offshore wind farm (alternative / historic name: Kriegers Flak K2-K3)
citation_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/kriegers-flak/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall power plant page
source_of_record_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/kriegers-flak/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Web sources for the built Danish project consistently use Kriegers Flak; the provided target name Kriegers Flak K2-K3 appears on open web summary pages as an alternative name for the same Danish offshore wind farm rather than a separate project. No current authoritative web source was found showing K2-K3 as a distinct standalone operating phase, so I treat it as the same asset and note the naming ambiguity explicitly.


wind_farm_id: 6432
canonical_id: 17546aff-b313-46eb-bc76-5ef08605a2d5
wind_farm_name: Kriegers Flak K2-K3
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 42055.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall Vindkraft Kriegers Flak P/S annual report
source_of_record_licence: public filing terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Vattenfall Vindkraft A/S / Vattenfall; Current owner: Vattenfall (100%); Operator: Vattenfall

resolved_value:
Developer: Vattenfall Vindkraft A/S / Vattenfall; Current owner: Vattenfall (100%); Operator: Vattenfall

citation_url:
https://regnskaber.cvrapi.dk/77557283/amNsb3VkczovLzAzLzM2L2RmL2NmLzkzL2EwMTItNDE3Yy1iYjZhLTBmOTkwMmZjZTc3Nw.pdf

research_summary:
Freshest dated ownership evidence used is the 2024 annual report of Vattenfall Vindkraft Kriegers Flak P/S, which states the company “owns and operates” Kriegers Flak. Vattenfall’s current plant page also presents Kriegers Flak as a Vattenfall-operated asset. No credible current source found any later equity sell-down; current owner/operator therefore remains Vattenfall 100%.

source_of_record_url:
https://regnskaber.cvrapi.dk/77557283/amNsb3VkczovLzAzLzM2L2RmL2NmLzkzL2EwMTItNDE3Yy1iYjZhLTBmOTkwMmZjZTc3Nw.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6432
canonical_id: 17546aff-b313-46eb-bc76-5ef08605a2d5
wind_farm_name: Kriegers Flak K2-K3
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://ens.dk/presse/kontrakter-succesfulde-havmoelleudbud-er-nu-underskrevet
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency contract signing notice
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/presse/kontrakter-succesfulde-havmoelleudbud-er-nu-underskrevet
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
09/11/2016 tender winner announced for Vattenfall; 22/12/2016 concession agreement signed; current ownership remains Vattenfall 100%

research_value:
09/11/2016 tender winner announced for Vattenfall; 22/12/2016 concession agreement signed; current ownership remains Vattenfall 100%

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on for current ownership is the 2024 annual report. Danish Energy Agency sources show Vattenfall winning the tender in November 2016 and the concession agreement being signed on 22/12/2016. I found no newer authoritative evidence of partial divestment, so ownership history supports continuity from developer/concessionaire to current sole owner.


wind_farm_id: 6432
canonical_id: 17546aff-b313-46eb-bc76-5ef08605a2d5
wind_farm_name: Kriegers Flak K2-K3
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 42056.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/kriegers-flak/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall power plant page
source_of_record_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/kriegers-flak/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Vattenfall’s live plant page says Kriegers Flak “has been in operation since 2021,” and the project was officially inaugurated in September 2021. That supports Boundary Layer status Operational.


wind_farm_id: 6432
canonical_id: 17546aff-b313-46eb-bc76-5ef08605a2d5
wind_farm_name: Kriegers Flak K2-K3
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 605 MW
resolved_value: 605 MW
research_value: 605 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42057.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall Vindkraft Kriegers Flak P/S annual report
source_of_record_licence: public filing terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://regnskaber.cvrapi.dk/77557283/amNsb3VkczovLzAzLzM2L2RmL2NmLzkzL2EwMTItNDE3Yy1iYjZhLTBmOTkwMmZjZTc3Nw.pdf

research_summary:
Vattenfall’s current plant page lists 605 MWe and the 2024 annual report states 72 turbines with a total capacity of 605 MW. Older project materials often rounded this to 600 MW or 604.8 MW; 605 MW is the clearest current operational figure.


wind_farm_id: 6432
canonical_id: 17546aff-b313-46eb-bc76-5ef08605a2d5
wind_farm_name: Kriegers Flak K2-K3
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.50hertz.com/en/Grid-Extension/Offshore-projects/Projects/Combined-Grid-Solution/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: 50Hertz Combined Grid Solution page
source_of_record_url: https://www.50hertz.com/en/Grid-Extension/Offshore-projects/Projects/Combined-Grid-Solution/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I found strong evidence for the 400 MW Combined Grid Solution interconnector transfer capacity, but that is not the same thing as the wind farm’s project MEC. Public sources reviewed clearly distinguish the wind farm’s installed capacity from the cross-border transfer capacity. I therefore leave MEC as Not confirmed rather than conflating it with the interconnector rating.


wind_farm_id: 6432
canonical_id: 17546aff-b313-46eb-bc76-5ef08605a2d5
wind_farm_name: Kriegers Flak K2-K3
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens Gamesa SWT-8.4-167
resolved_value: Siemens Gamesa SWT-8.4-167
research_value: Siemens Gamesa SWT-8.4-167
resolved_fact_id: 42058.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall Kriegers Flak factsheet PDF
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/dk/contentassets/81eb2bf7195044479f6a3c0b1bb2f0f8/210903_vf_factsheet_kriegers_flak.pdf

research_summary:
Project-specific Vattenfall factsheet explicitly gives turbine type Siemens Gamesa SWT-8.4-167. Siemens Gamesa’s project award release confirms supply of 72 SG 8.0-167 DD turbines; these references indicate the same 8.4/167 project-specific configuration family. Because the project-specific Vattenfall source is stronger for the as-built site, I use SWT-8.4-167.

source_of_record_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/dk/contentassets/81eb2bf7195044479f6a3c0b1bb2f0f8/210903_vf_factsheet_kriegers_flak.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6432
canonical_id: 17546aff-b313-46eb-bc76-5ef08605a2d5
wind_farm_name: Kriegers Flak K2-K3
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 8
resolved_value: 8
research_value: 8.4 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9335.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Vattenfall Kriegers Flak factsheet PDF
research_source_type: owner factsheet
research_source_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Vattenfall’s project-specific factsheet states 8.4 MW turbines. Siemens Gamesa’s 2017 award note referred to SG 8.0-167 DD and 600 MW, but later Vattenfall project material and current capacity figures reconcile better with an uprated 8.4 MW / 604.8 MW configuration.


wind_farm_id: 6432
canonical_id: 17546aff-b313-46eb-bc76-5ef08605a2d5
wind_farm_name: Kriegers Flak K2-K3
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 167
resolved_value: 167
research_value: 167 m
resolved_fact_id: 9490.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Vattenfall Kriegers Flak factsheet PDF
research_source_type: owner factsheet
research_source_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Vattenfall’s project-specific factsheet explicitly lists blade length/rotor as 81.4 m / 167 m. The linked EuroWindWakes fallback value also matches 167 m, so the web and dataset evidence align.


wind_farm_id: 6432
canonical_id: 17546aff-b313-46eb-bc76-5ef08605a2d5
wind_farm_name: Kriegers Flak K2-K3
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 107
resolved_value: 107
research_value: 107 m
resolved_fact_id: 9645.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources reviewed did not clearly state hub height. Per the required fallback rule, I therefore use the linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata value 107 m and state explicitly that this is a dataset fallback because project-specific web evidence remained inconclusive.


wind_farm_id: 6432
canonical_id: 17546aff-b313-46eb-bc76-5ef08605a2d5
wind_farm_name: Kriegers Flak K2-K3
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 72
resolved_value: 72
research_value: 72
resolved_fact_id: 48487.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 72 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Vattenfall power plant page
research_source_type: owner/operator webpage
research_source_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/kriegers-flak/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Vattenfall’s current plant page and 2024 annual report both confirm 72 turbines. This aligns with the non-web validation signals provided: EuroWindWakes linked-turbine count 72 and EMODnet hint 72. No phase-scope mismatch was found for the operating Danish project.


wind_farm_id: 6432
canonical_id: 17546aff-b313-46eb-bc76-5ef08605a2d5
wind_farm_name: Kriegers Flak K2-K3
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile
resolved_value: Monopile
research_value: Monopile
resolved_fact_id: 42064.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall first foundation release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/press-and-media/news--press-releases/newsroom/2020/first-foundation-for-kriegers-flak-offshore-wind-farm-in-place

research_summary:
Vattenfall states the project uses monopile foundations and notes these were manufactured by EEW-SPC. This is project-specific and stronger than generic secondary summaries.

source_of_record_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/press-and-media/news--press-releases/newsroom/2020/first-foundation-for-kriegers-flak-offshore-wind-farm-in-place


wind_farm_id: 6432
canonical_id: 17546aff-b313-46eb-bc76-5ef08605a2d5
wind_farm_name: Kriegers Flak K2-K3
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 03/02/2020
resolved_value: 03/02/2020
research_value: 03/02/2020
resolved_fact_id: 42065.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-giver-endelig-tilladelse-til-kriegers-flak-havvindmoellepark
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency final permit notice
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-giver-endelig-tilladelse-til-kriegers-flak-havvindmoellepark
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The Danish Energy Agency announced on 03/02/2020 that it had approved the detailed project and granted the EIA permit, enabling construction to begin. Earlier concession/establishment approvals existed in 2016, but for a single “consent date” row the clearest construction-enabling consent milestone evidenced on the public regulator page is 03/02/2020.


wind_farm_id: 6432
canonical_id: 17546aff-b313-46eb-bc76-5ef08605a2d5
wind_farm_name: Kriegers Flak K2-K3
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 20/12/2018
resolved_value: 20/12/2018
research_value: 20/12/2018
resolved_fact_id: 42066.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall major contracts release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/press-and-media/newsroom/2018/vattenfall-signs-major-contracts-for-kriegers-flak-offshore-wind-farm/

research_summary:
Vattenfall’s December 2018 contracts release says the company entered major construction contracts for Kriegers Flak; Vattenfall’s own earlier award release had said investment was pending a final investment decision. Secondary project reporting explicitly places FID in December 2018. Using the dated Vattenfall contract award as the practical FID marker is the most supportable public date found.

source_of_record_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/press-and-media/newsroom/2018/vattenfall-signs-major-contracts-for-kriegers-flak-offshore-wind-farm/


wind_farm_id: 6432
canonical_id: 17546aff-b313-46eb-bc76-5ef08605a2d5
wind_farm_name: Kriegers Flak K2-K3
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 27/01/2021
resolved_value: 27/01/2021
research_value: 27/01/2021
resolved_fact_id: 42067.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall first turbine release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/press-and-media/newsroom/2021/first-turbine-at-kriegers-flak-offshore-wind-farm-in-place/

research_summary:
Vattenfall stated when the first turbine was installed on 27/01/2021 that households and industry would receive the first fossil-free electricity “one of the coming days.” No more precise public first-export date was found. I therefore use 27/01/2021 as the closest evidenced first-power milestone and note the nuance.

source_of_record_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/press-and-media/newsroom/2021/first-turbine-at-kriegers-flak-offshore-wind-farm-in-place/


wind_farm_id: 6432
canonical_id: 17546aff-b313-46eb-bc76-5ef08605a2d5
wind_farm_name: Kriegers Flak K2-K3
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2021-09-01
resolved_value: 2021-09-01
research_value: 06/09/2021
resolved_fact_id: 9800.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Vattenfall inauguration release
research_source_type: owner press release
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Vattenfall officially inaugurated Kriegers Flak on 06/09/2021 and described it as ready to supply Danish households and industry. Although some earlier pages said the project would be in full operation by end-2021, the inauguration is the clearest public completion/operational milestone with an exact date.

research_source_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/press-and-media/pressreleases/2021/scandinavias-largest-offshore-wind-farm-inaugurated/


wind_farm_id: 6433
canonical_id: 9c228ad9-7bad-4511-a4d0-724f599ec58f
wind_farm_name: Nysted
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Nysted Offshore Windfarm; historic/alternative names: Nysted Havvindmøllepark, Rødsand, Rødsand I
research_value: Nysted Offshore Windfarm; historic/alternative names: Nysted Havvindmøllepark, Rødsand, Rødsand I
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/6696/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency permit extension decision
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/6696/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Danish Energy Agency permit documents explicitly name the asset “Nysted Havvindmøllepark”; older technical/research material ties the same 2003 project to the Rødsand location/name. This resolves the name ambiguity as the original Nysted/Rødsand I project, not Rødsand 2.


wind_farm_id: 6433
canonical_id: 9c228ad9-7bad-4511-a4d0-724f599ec58f
wind_farm_name: Nysted
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 42069.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://orsted.com/en/Our-business/Offshore-wind/Our-offshore-wind-farms
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted offshore wind farms portfolio
source_of_record_url: https://orsted.com/en/Our-business/Offshore-wind/Our-offshore-wind-farms
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Energi E2, DONG and Sydkraft consortium (historic). Current owners: Ørsted 42.7%, PensionDanmark 50.0%, Stadtwerke Lübeck 7.25%. Operator: Ørsted

resolved_value:
Developer: Energi E2, DONG and Sydkraft consortium (historic). Current owners: Ørsted 42.7%, PensionDanmark 50.0%, Stadtwerke Lübeck 7.25%. Operator: Ørsted

research_summary:
Freshest dated ownership evidence used: Danish Energy Agency permit decision dated 26/06/2025 confirms permit holder Nysted I A/S under Ørsted; PensionDanmark’s live asset page confirms its 50% stake and says Ørsted remains operator; Ørsted’s portfolio page shows its 42.7% ownership share and names partners Stadtwerke Lübeck and PensionDanmark.


wind_farm_id: 6433
canonical_id: 9c228ad9-7bad-4511-a4d0-724f599ec58f
wind_farm_name: Nysted
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.isc.dk/en/projects/nysted
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ISC project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.isc.dk/en/projects/nysted
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Built by consortium Energi E2 50%, DONG 30%, Sydkraft 20%; by 2010 PensionDanmark acquired 50%; by 2013 ownership shown as DONG/Ørsted 42.75%, Stadtwerke Lübeck 7.25%, PensionDanmark 50%

research_value:
Built by consortium Energi E2 50%, DONG 30%, Sydkraft 20%; by 2010 PensionDanmark acquired 50%; by 2013 ownership shown as DONG/Ørsted 42.75%, Stadtwerke Lübeck 7.25%, PensionDanmark 50%

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on for current structure is Ørsted portfolio page crawled recently plus Danish Energy Agency permit dated 26/06/2025; historic evolution is supported by ISC’s project history, Ørsted’s 2010 divestment announcement to PensionDanmark, and Ørsted’s 2013/2017 anniversary article showing the reconciled 42.75/7.25/50 split.


wind_farm_id: 6433
canonical_id: 9c228ad9-7bad-4511-a4d0-724f599ec58f
wind_farm_name: Nysted
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 42070.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/6696/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency permit extension decision
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/6696/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The wind farm is operating and has received a life-extension decision. Danish Energy Agency’s 26/06/2025 decision allows continued operation of the remaining 70 turbines from 09/06/2028 to 08/06/2038, confirming the project is still an operating asset rather than decommissioned or repowered.


wind_farm_id: 6433
canonical_id: 9c228ad9-7bad-4511-a4d0-724f599ec58f
wind_farm_name: Nysted
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 165.6 MW installed originally; 161 MW currently operational after loss/shutdown of 2 turbines
resolved_value: 165.6 MW installed originally; 161 MW currently operational after loss/shutdown of 2 turbines
research_value: 165.6 MW installed originally; 161 MW currently operational after loss/shutdown of 2 turbines
resolved_fact_id: 42071.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/6700/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency lifetime-extension screening
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/6700/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official sources distinguish original gross installed capacity from current operating capacity. DEA screening says 165.6 MW (161 MW currently) and permit extension covers 70 turbines ... 161 MW. For project profile purposes, the built installed capacity remains 165.6 MW, with the current operational nuance noted.


wind_farm_id: 6433
canonical_id: 9c228ad9-7bad-4511-a4d0-724f599ec58f
wind_farm_name: Nysted
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/6700/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency lifetime-extension screening
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/6700/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Publicly accessible sources reviewed confirm a 132 kV export cable/grid connection but do not clearly state an explicit MEC/export-capacity value separate from installed capacity. I have therefore kept MEC as Not confirmed rather than inferring it from gross capacity.


wind_farm_id: 6433
canonical_id: 9c228ad9-7bad-4511-a4d0-724f599ec58f
wind_farm_name: Nysted
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Bonus B82/2300
resolved_value: Bonus B82/2300
research_value: Bonus B82/2300
resolved_fact_id: 42072.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific public web sources confirm 72 turbines at 2.3 MW and rotor c.82.4 m, but do not clearly name the exact as-built turbine designation on an authoritative live project page. Per the required fallback rule, the linked EuroWindWakes project-turbine dataset value B82/2300 is used.


wind_farm_id: 6433
canonical_id: 9c228ad9-7bad-4511-a4d0-724f599ec58f
wind_farm_name: Nysted
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Bonus
resolved_value: Bonus
research_value: Bonus
resolved_fact_id: 9026.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
ISC says the turbines were supplied by Bonus Energi A/S; project-specific web sourcing for exact OEM branding is otherwise thin. This aligns with the linked EuroWindWakes fallback row, so Bonus is retained.


wind_farm_id: 6433
canonical_id: 9c228ad9-7bad-4511-a4d0-724f599ec58f
wind_farm_name: Nysted
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 82
resolved_value: 82
research_value: 82.4 m
resolved_fact_id: 9491.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Danish Energy Agency lifetime-extension screening
research_source_type: regulator PDF
research_source_url: https://ens.dk/media/6700/download
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
DEA screening provides a project-specific technical table with rotor diameter 82.4 m. This is consistent with Ørsted’s portfolio page and closely aligned with the EuroWindWakes fallback value of 82 m.


wind_farm_id: 6433
canonical_id: 9c228ad9-7bad-4511-a4d0-724f599ec58f
wind_farm_name: Nysted
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 69
resolved_value: 69
research_value: 69 m
resolved_fact_id: 9646.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web evidence is slightly inconsistent: DEA screening gives 68 m hub height, while the linked EuroWindWakes project-turbine metadata gives 69 m. Per the required fallback policy prioritising linked EuroWindWakes for turbine-specific fields when web evidence is inconclusive/conflicting, 69 m is used.


wind_farm_id: 6433
canonical_id: 9c228ad9-7bad-4511-a4d0-724f599ec58f
wind_farm_name: Nysted
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 56
resolved_value: 56
research_value: 72 originally; 70 currently operating
resolved_fact_id: 48488.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 56 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Danish Energy Agency permit extension decision
research_source_type: regulator PDF
research_source_url: https://ens.dk/media/6696/download
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Multiple authoritative sources confirm the built project had 72 turbines. DEA’s 2025 permit documents explain that turbine A02 was decommissioned after a 12/01/2022 failure and G04 was taken out of operation for safety reasons, leaving 70 turbines covered by the extension permit. This aligns with the EMODnet hint of 72 and explains why the linked EuroWindWakes count of 56 likely reflects incomplete linked turbine locations rather than as-built count.


wind_farm_id: 6433
canonical_id: 9c228ad9-7bad-4511-a4d0-724f599ec58f
wind_farm_name: Nysted
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Concrete gravity-base foundations
resolved_value: Concrete gravity-base foundations
research_value: Concrete gravity-base foundations
resolved_fact_id: 42078.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/6700/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency lifetime-extension screening
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/6700/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Both project engineering and regulator/research sources describe the turbine foundations as concrete gravity/gravity-base foundations.


wind_farm_id: 6433
canonical_id: 9c228ad9-7bad-4511-a4d0-724f599ec58f
wind_farm_name: Nysted
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 27/07/2001
resolved_value: 27/07/2001
research_value: 27/07/2001
resolved_fact_id: 42079.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/6696/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency permit extension decision
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/6696/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
DEA’s 2025 permit decision states that the establishment permit for the demonstration wind farm at Rødsand/Nysted was granted on 27/07/2001.


wind_farm_id: 6433
canonical_id: 9c228ad9-7bad-4511-a4d0-724f599ec58f
wind_farm_name: Nysted
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: 2005 demonstration-project review report
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://documents.dps.ny.gov/public/Common/ViewDoc.aspx?DocRefId=%7B9A0E6CAA-9946-409B-8D2D-23B93D65F102%7D

research_summary:
I found construction starting in June 2002 and permit milestones, but no openly accessible authoritative source clearly stating a board/FID date for this early project. Kept as Not confirmed rather than inferring FID from construction start.

source_of_record_url:
https://documents.dps.ny.gov/public/Common/ViewDoc.aspx?DocRefId=%7B9A0E6CAA-9946-409B-8D2D-23B93D65F102%7D


wind_farm_id: 6433
canonical_id: 9c228ad9-7bad-4511-a4d0-724f599ec58f
wind_farm_name: Nysted
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/12/2003
resolved_value: 01/12/2003
research_value: 01/12/2003
resolved_fact_id: 42080.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: 2005 demonstration-project review report
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://documents.dps.ny.gov/public/Common/ViewDoc.aspx?DocRefId=%7B9A0E6CAA-9946-409B-8D2D-23B93D65F102%7D

research_summary:
Accessible technical/research sources consistently state the wind farm “officially started” / entered normal operation on 1 December 2003. No earlier energisation date was found in an accessible authoritative source, so the normal-operation/start-of-operation date is used as first power.


wind_farm_id: 6433
canonical_id: 9c228ad9-7bad-4511-a4d0-724f599ec58f
wind_farm_name: Nysted
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2003-12-01
resolved_value: 2003-12-01
research_value: 01/12/2003
resolved_fact_id: 9801.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Tethys porpoise report
research_source_type: research report PDF
research_source_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Tougaard-et-al-2006.pdf
research_source_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Multiple technical sources state stable/normal operation from 01/12/2003; this is the clearest accessible commissioning milestone.


wind_farm_id: 6434
canonical_id: 583e1732-0ba4-4583-adb4-163b16590171
wind_farm_name: Sprogo
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Sprogø offshore wind farm (also referred to as Sprogø Havmøllepark / Sprogø Wind Farm)
research_value: Sprogø offshore wind farm (also referred to as Sprogø Havmøllepark / Sprogø Wind Farm)
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Identity is consistent across Danish Energy Agency, Boskalis project material, and industry reporting: a 7-turbine offshore wind farm north of Sprogø in the Great Belt. No phase ambiguity found for the built asset.


wind_farm_id: 6434
canonical_id: 583e1732-0ba4-4583-adb4-163b16590171
wind_farm_name: Sprogo
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 42082.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://europeanenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/group-structure-annual-report-2025.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: European Energy group structure annual report 2025/2026
source_of_record_url: https://europeanenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/group-structure-annual-report-2025.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Sund & Bælt / A/S Storebælt; Current owner: European Energy group via EE Sprogø OWF ApS; Operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: Sund & Bælt / A/S Storebælt; Current owner: European Energy group via EE Sprogø OWF ApS; Operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
Danish Energy Agency confirms Sund & Bælt received the original permit on 29/12/2008 and later approved transfer on 29/05/2018 to Sprogø OWF K/S. Freshest ownership evidence relied on: European Energy group structure document published in 2026 listing EE Sprogø OWF ApS DK 100.00%. Operator after the 2018 sale is not clearly confirmed by a current official source; older sources show MHI Vestas service under A/S Storebælt and NorSea won an O&M contract in 2018, but a current dated operator page was not found.


wind_farm_id: 6434
canonical_id: 583e1732-0ba4-4583-adb4-163b16590171
wind_farm_name: Sprogo
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Sund & Bælt / A/S Storebælt → transferred to Sprogø OWF K/S on 29/05/2018; current European Energy group ownership indicated via EE Sprogø OWF ApS

research_value:
Sund & Bælt / A/S Storebælt → transferred to Sprogø OWF K/S on 29/05/2018; current European Energy group ownership indicated via EE Sprogø OWF ApS

research_summary:
Ownership progression is supported by Danish Energy Agency transfer notice and 16/03/2018 sale reporting that European Energy acquired the project from A/S Storebælt, a Sund & Bælt subsidiary. Freshest source date relied on: European Energy group structure PDF published in 2026. Exact present equity percentages beyond European Energy group control were not publicly confirmed from an accessible official project/JV page, so percentages are not stated.


wind_farm_id: 6434
canonical_id: 583e1732-0ba4-4583-adb4-163b16590171
wind_farm_name: Sprogo
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 42083.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Multiple sources describe Sprogø as an operating / established offshore wind farm. DEA lists it among established offshore wind farms; European Energy’s 2018 annual report describes it as an acquired existing offshore wind farm.


wind_farm_id: 6434
canonical_id: 583e1732-0ba4-4583-adb4-163b16590171
wind_farm_name: Sprogo
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Accessible web sources confirm gross installed capacity only. No open official source located that explicitly states a distinct MEC / export capacity for Sprogø.


wind_farm_id: 6434
canonical_id: 583e1732-0ba4-4583-adb4-163b16590171
wind_farm_name: Sprogo
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas V90-3.0 MW Offshore
resolved_value: Vestas V90-3.0 MW Offshore
research_value: Vestas V90-3.0 MW Offshore
resolved_fact_id: 42085.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.offshorewind.biz/2015/03/30/mhi-vestas-extends-sprogo-contract/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: OffshoreWIND.biz
source_of_record_url: https://www.offshorewind.biz/2015/03/30/mhi-vestas-extends-sprogo-contract/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources confirm Vestas V90-3.0 MW turbines at Sprogø. This also matches the linked EuroWindWakes fallback row; web evidence was sufficient so fallback was confirmatory rather than decisive.


wind_farm_id: 6434
canonical_id: 583e1732-0ba4-4583-adb4-163b16590171
wind_farm_name: Sprogo
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas
resolved_value: Vestas
research_value: Vestas
resolved_fact_id: 9027.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: MaritimeDanmark
research_source_type: industry news
research_source_url: https://www.maritimedanmark.dk/sprogo-havmollepark-abner-fredag
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Maritimedanmark states Vestas Offshore delivered the seven turbines; The Wind Power lists Vestas as manufacturer. This also matches the linked EuroWindWakes fallback.


wind_farm_id: 6434
canonical_id: 583e1732-0ba4-4583-adb4-163b16590171
wind_farm_name: Sprogo
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 3
resolved_value: 3
research_value: 3 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9337.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: OffshoreWIND.biz
research_source_type: industry news
research_source_url: https://www.offshorewind.biz/2015/03/30/mhi-vestas-extends-sprogo-contract/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific sources state seven V90-3.0 MW turbines; 21 MW total over seven turbines also reconciles. This matches the linked EuroWindWakes fallback.


wind_farm_id: 6434
canonical_id: 583e1732-0ba4-4583-adb4-163b16590171
wind_farm_name: Sprogo
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 90
resolved_value: 90
research_value: 90 m
resolved_fact_id: 9492.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: MaritimeDanmark
research_source_type: industry news
research_source_url: https://www.maritimedanmark.dk/sprogo-havmollepark-abner-fredag
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Maritimedanmark explicitly ties a 90 m rotor diameter to the Sprogø turbines; The Wind Power also lists diameter 90 m for the project turbines. This matches the linked EuroWindWakes fallback.


wind_farm_id: 6434
canonical_id: 583e1732-0ba4-4583-adb4-163b16590171
wind_farm_name: Sprogo
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 70
resolved_value: 70
research_value: 70 m
resolved_fact_id: 9647.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: MaritimeDanmark
research_source_type: industry news
research_source_url: https://www.maritimedanmark.dk/sprogo-havmollepark-abner-fredag
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Maritimedanmark explicitly states navhøjde på 70 m for the Sprogø turbines. The blocked Zenodo dataset source was removed and replaced with this accessible project-specific page as source of record.


wind_farm_id: 6434
canonical_id: 583e1732-0ba4-4583-adb4-163b16590171
wind_farm_name: Sprogo
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 7
resolved_value: 7
research_value: 7
resolved_fact_id: 48489.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 7 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Danish Energy Agency
research_source_type: regulator
research_source_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
DEA, CMS and European Energy all support seven turbines. This aligns with the non-web validation signals: EMODnet hint 7 and linked EuroWindWakes calculated turbine count 7.


wind_farm_id: 6434
canonical_id: 583e1732-0ba4-4583-adb4-163b16590171
wind_farm_name: Sprogo
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Concrete gravity-based foundations
resolved_value: Concrete gravity-based foundations
research_value: Concrete gravity-based foundations
resolved_fact_id: 42091.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Per Aarsleff Holding A/S release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2009/02/05/17476/0/en/Aarsleff-wins-new-offshore-wind-turbine-contract.html

research_summary:
Aarsleff’s 05/02/2009 release says the project used seven “gravitation foundations” placed on the seabed. A second open source also lists “Concrete gravity-based foundations.”

source_of_record_url:
https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2009/02/05/17476/0/en/Aarsleff-wins-new-offshore-wind-turbine-contract.html


wind_farm_id: 6434
canonical_id: 583e1732-0ba4-4583-adb4-163b16590171
wind_farm_name: Sprogo
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 29/12/2008
resolved_value: 29/12/2008
research_value: 29/12/2008
resolved_fact_id: 42092.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-giver-tilladelse-til-7-vindmoeller-nord-sprogoe
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/presse/energistyrelsen-giver-tilladelse-til-7-vindmoeller-nord-sprogoe
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
DEA press release dated 05/01/2009 states the permit was granted on 29/12/2008. DEA’s established-project page repeats that date.


wind_farm_id: 6434
canonical_id: 583e1732-0ba4-4583-adb4-163b16590171
wind_farm_name: Sprogo
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://boskalis.com/about-us/projects/offshore-wind-farm-sprogo
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Boskalis
source_of_record_url: https://boskalis.com/about-us/projects/offshore-wind-farm-sprogo
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible official or regulator source located that explicitly states an FID date for this small owner-led project.


wind_farm_id: 6434
canonical_id: 583e1732-0ba4-4583-adb4-163b16590171
wind_farm_name: Sprogo
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.maritimedanmark.dk/sprogo-havmollepark-abner-fredag
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: MaritimeDanmark
source_of_record_url: https://www.maritimedanmark.dk/sprogo-havmollepark-abner-fredag
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Accessible sources confirm construction in 2009 and official opening in early December 2009, but no reliable open source located that explicitly states the first power / first electricity date.


wind_farm_id: 6434
canonical_id: 583e1732-0ba4-4583-adb4-163b16590171
wind_farm_name: Sprogo
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2009-12-01
resolved_value: 2009-12-01
research_value: 01/12/2009
resolved_fact_id: 9802.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
The project was officially opened on 04/12/2009, while multiple sources only confirm commissioning/established year 2009. To normalize this partial evidence, the table uses 01/12/2009 as a month-level commissioning date; this also matches the linked EuroWindWakes commissioning month fallback.


wind_farm_id: 6435
canonical_id: b07b85aa-8807-4502-acef-8a49a59f79e3
wind_farm_name: Tunø Knob
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Tunø Knob offshore wind farm
research_value: Tunø Knob offshore wind farm
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/5681/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency - Danish Experiences from Offshore Wind
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/5681/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Danish Energy Agency material lists Tunø Knob among Danish offshore wind farms, and Vestas identifies Tunø Knob as its first offshore project. Alternative spelling Tunoe Knob / Tuno Knob appears in English-language industry and service pages, but the target identity remains the same project.


wind_farm_id: 6435
canonical_id: b07b85aa-8807-4502-acef-8a49a59f79e3
wind_farm_name: Tunø Knob
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 42094.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/sites/default/files/media/documents/2024-11/offshore_wind_development_0.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency - Offshore wind development PDF
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/sites/default/files/media/documents/2024-11/offshore_wind_development_0.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Not confirmed; historic operator/customer: DONG Energy; current owner(s): Not confirmed; operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: Not confirmed; historic operator/customer: DONG Energy; current owner(s): Not confirmed; operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
Project-specific public web evidence clearly ties the site historically to DONG Energy: the Danish Energy Agency table shows Operator: DONG Energy, and Offshore Energy’s 23/03/2011 article says Customer: DONG. I did not find a newer dated authoritative owner/operator page that cleanly confirms the present-day ownership structure, so current owner(s), equity split, and current operator are kept as Not confirmed rather than inferred from conflicting secondary databases. Freshest dated source relied on for the historic DONG linkage is the Danish Energy Agency PDF published 2024.


wind_farm_id: 6435
canonical_id: b07b85aa-8807-4502-acef-8a49a59f79e3
wind_farm_name: Tunø Knob
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.offshore-energy.biz/tunoe-knob-offshore-wind-farm-still-spinning-denmark/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Offshore Energy article
source_of_record_url: https://www.offshore-energy.biz/tunoe-knob-offshore-wind-farm-still-spinning-denmark/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Historic linkage to DONG Energy confirmed; later ownership changes and current equity split: Not confirmed

research_value:
Historic linkage to DONG Energy confirmed; later ownership changes and current equity split: Not confirmed

research_summary:
The available authoritative/public sources support DONG Energy as the historical operator/customer, but I did not find an openly accessible current official project/JV/operator page with reconciled present ownership percentages. Per the instruction set, I therefore avoid silently converting DONG to Ørsted or adopting third-party owner claims. Freshest source date relied on for the historic DONG linkage is 2024 from the Danish Energy Agency PDF.


wind_farm_id: 6435
canonical_id: b07b85aa-8807-4502-acef-8a49a59f79e3
wind_farm_name: Tunø Knob
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 42095.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.vestas.com/en/energy-solutions/offshore-wind-turbines
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vestas offshore wind turbines page
source_of_record_url: https://www.vestas.com/en/energy-solutions/offshore-wind-turbines
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Vestas says Tunø Knob is the world’s oldest commercial offshore wind farm with its Vestas turbines still operating today, and a 2025 ZF/Vestas-related release says it remains operational today. This supports the Boundary Layer status Operational.


wind_farm_id: 6435
canonical_id: b07b85aa-8807-4502-acef-8a49a59f79e3
wind_farm_name: Tunø Knob
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 5 MW
resolved_value: 5 MW
research_value: 5 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42096.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/5681/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency - Danish Experiences from Offshore Wind
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/5681/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The Danish Energy Agency lists Tunø Knob 1995 10 5 MW and the operator/turbine/foundation table lists Tunø Knob ... 5 MW. Offshore Energy’s project box also states Capacity: 5 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6435
canonical_id: b07b85aa-8807-4502-acef-8a49a59f79e3
wind_farm_name: Tunø Knob
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/5681/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency - Danish Experiences from Offshore Wind
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/5681/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible project-specific official or regulatory source found in this research pass stated a separate export capacity/MEC for Tunø Knob. Available sources consistently confirm only gross installed capacity of 5 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6435
canonical_id: b07b85aa-8807-4502-acef-8a49a59f79e3
wind_farm_name: Tunø Knob
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas V39-500 kW
resolved_value: Vestas V39-500 kW
research_value: Vestas V39-500 kW
resolved_fact_id: 42097.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/sites/default/files/media/documents/2024-11/offshore_wind_development_0.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency - Offshore wind development PDF
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/sites/default/files/media/documents/2024-11/offshore_wind_development_0.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web evidence is strong: the Danish Energy Agency lists Vestas V39-500 kW for Tunø Knob, and Offshore Energy states Type: V39-500 kw. This aligns with the linked EuroWindWakes fallback.


wind_farm_id: 6435
canonical_id: b07b85aa-8807-4502-acef-8a49a59f79e3
wind_farm_name: Tunø Knob
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas
resolved_value: Vestas
research_value: Vestas
resolved_fact_id: 9028.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Vestas offshore wind turbines page
research_source_type: OEM webpage
research_source_url: https://www.vestas.com/en/energy-solutions/offshore-wind-turbines
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
The Danish Energy Agency table gives Vestas V39-500 kW and Vestas itself identifies Tunø Knob as its first offshore project. This also matches the linked EuroWindWakes fallback OEM.


wind_farm_id: 6435
canonical_id: b07b85aa-8807-4502-acef-8a49a59f79e3
wind_farm_name: Tunø Knob
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0.5
resolved_value: 0.5
research_value: 0.5 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9338.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Offshore Energy article
research_source_type: industry news
research_source_url: https://www.offshore-energy.biz/tunoe-knob-offshore-wind-farm-still-spinning-denmark/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Offshore Energy states ten 500 kW turbines and the Danish Energy Agency lists V39-500 kW. This matches the linked EuroWindWakes fallback value of 0.5 MW per turbine.


wind_farm_id: 6435
canonical_id: b07b85aa-8807-4502-acef-8a49a59f79e3
wind_farm_name: Tunø Knob
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 39
resolved_value: 39
research_value: 39 m
resolved_fact_id: 9493.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web pages found in this pass did not explicitly state rotor diameter tied to Tunø Knob itself. Per the required fallback rule, I therefore use the linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata value 39 m, which is consistent with the project’s cited V39 turbine designation.


wind_farm_id: 6435
canonical_id: b07b85aa-8807-4502-acef-8a49a59f79e3
wind_farm_name: Tunø Knob
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 45
resolved_value: 45
research_value: 45 m
resolved_fact_id: 9648.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Offshore Energy article
research_source_type: industry news
research_source_url: https://www.offshore-energy.biz/tunoe-knob-offshore-wind-farm-still-spinning-denmark/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Offshore Energy’s project box explicitly states Hub height: 45 m for Tunoe Knob. This matches the linked EuroWindWakes fallback value 45 m, so the figure is supported both by project-specific web evidence and the required fallback dataset.


wind_farm_id: 6435
canonical_id: b07b85aa-8807-4502-acef-8a49a59f79e3
wind_farm_name: Tunø Knob
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 10
resolved_value: 10
research_value: 10
resolved_fact_id: 48490.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 10 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Danish Energy Agency - Danish Experiences from Offshore Wind
research_source_type: government PDF
research_source_url: https://ens.dk/media/5681/download
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Danish Energy Agency tables list 10 turbines, Offshore Energy says Amount: 10 units, and Lex says the site has ti havbaserede møller. This web-sourced figure aligns with all non-web validation signals provided in the prompt, including the EMODnet hint and EuroWindWakes linked-turbine count of 10.


wind_farm_id: 6435
canonical_id: b07b85aa-8807-4502-acef-8a49a59f79e3
wind_farm_name: Tunø Knob
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Gravity based
resolved_value: Gravity based
research_value: Gravity based
resolved_fact_id: 42103.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/sites/default/files/media/documents/2024-11/offshore_wind_development_0.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency - Offshore wind development PDF
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/sites/default/files/media/documents/2024-11/offshore_wind_development_0.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The Danish Energy Agency’s operator/turbine/foundation table lists Gravity based, and Lex describes betonfundamenter at Tunø Knob.


wind_farm_id: 6435
canonical_id: b07b85aa-8807-4502-acef-8a49a59f79e3
wind_farm_name: Tunø Knob
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/5681/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency - Danish Experiences from Offshore Wind
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/5681/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible official/regulatory source found in this pass gave a project-specific consent date for Tunø Knob.


wind_farm_id: 6435
canonical_id: b07b85aa-8807-4502-acef-8a49a59f79e3
wind_farm_name: Tunø Knob
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.offshore-energy.biz/tunoe-knob-offshore-wind-farm-still-spinning-denmark/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Offshore Energy article
source_of_record_url: https://www.offshore-energy.biz/tunoe-knob-offshore-wind-farm-still-spinning-denmark/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible project-specific source found in this pass stated an FID date; given the project’s 1995 demonstration-era vintage, modern FID-style disclosure is not evident in the sources reviewed.


wind_farm_id: 6435
canonical_id: b07b85aa-8807-4502-acef-8a49a59f79e3
wind_farm_name: Tunø Knob
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/5681/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency - Danish Experiences from Offshore Wind
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/5681/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Sources reviewed confirm 1995 commissioning, but no accessible source located in this pass gave a distinct first-power date earlier than full commissioning.


wind_farm_id: 6435
canonical_id: b07b85aa-8807-4502-acef-8a49a59f79e3
wind_farm_name: Tunø Knob
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1995-05-01
resolved_value: 1995-05-01
research_value: 01/01/1995
resolved_fact_id: 9803.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Danish Energy Agency - Danish Experiences from Offshore Wind
research_source_type: government PDF
research_source_url: https://ens.dk/media/5681/download
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Multiple sources confirm only the year 1995 for commissioning. Following the normalization rule for year-only evidence, the table uses 01/01/1995.


wind_farm_id: 6439
canonical_id: 01980f70-902a-482d-94d6-8e006a4a536a
wind_farm_name: Avedøre Holme
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Avedøre Holme Offshore Wind Farm
research_value: Avedøre Holme Offshore Wind Farm
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – existing offshore wind farms
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Danish Energy Agency page for existing offshore wind farms identifies Avedøre Holme (2009/2010) as a 3-turbine demonstration scheme south of the dike at Avedøre Holme. Hvidovre cooperative material refers to the same asset as Hvidovre Offshore Wind Farm in English-language outreach, but that appears to be an alternative/promotional name for the same project rather than a different phase.


wind_farm_id: 6439
canonical_id: 01980f70-902a-482d-94d6-8e006a4a536a
wind_farm_name: Avedøre Holme
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 42105.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.hvidovre.dk/erhverv/byggeri-og-erhvervsomraader/erhvervsomraader/avedoere-holme
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Hvidovre Kommune
source_of_record_url: https://www.hvidovre.dk/erhverv/byggeri-og-erhvervsomraader/erhvervsomraader/avedoere-holme
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: DONG Energy (now Ørsted). Current owners: Ørsted (2 turbines) and Hvidovre Vindmøllelaug / Avedøre Vindmøllelaug cooperative (1 turbine). Operator: Ørsted operates 2 turbines; cooperative operates/holds 1 turbine interest.

resolved_value:
Developer: DONG Energy (now Ørsted). Current owners: Ørsted (2 turbines) and Hvidovre Vindmøllelaug / Avedøre Vindmøllelaug cooperative (1 turbine). Operator: Ørsted operates 2 turbines; cooperative operates/holds 1 turbine interest.

research_summary:
The freshest owner/operator-type source found is Hvidovre Municipality’s live page, which states “Ørsted driver to af møllerne. Den tredje drives af Avedøre Vindmøllelaug”; DEA confirms one turbine is owned by Hvidovre Vindmøllelaug and the project permission was granted to Ørsted/DONG. Ownership is therefore best read as 2/3 Ørsted and 1/3 cooperative, with the cooperative turbine held through the local wind cooperative structure. Freshest visible dated supporting source for the cooperative side is the Hvidovre Vindmøllelaug website content crawled in 2026; municipality page has no visible publication date, so it is used as a current background confirmation rather than date-stamped corporate evidence.


wind_farm_id: 6439
canonical_id: 01980f70-902a-482d-94d6-8e006a4a536a
wind_farm_name: Avedøre Holme
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – existing offshore wind farms
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developed by DONG Energy with a local cooperative partner; 2 turbines remained with DONG/Ørsted and 1 turbine with the local cooperative from commissioning onward.

research_value:
Developed by DONG Energy with a local cooperative partner; 2 turbines remained with DONG/Ørsted and 1 turbine with the local cooperative from commissioning onward.

research_summary:
19/11/2008 industry coverage says DONG Energy was constructing 3 new turbines as a demonstration project. DEA later states one of the first two turbines was owned by Hvidovre Vindmøllelaug and the third turbine was installed in 2011. Hvidovre Vindmøllelaug material submitted on 13/01/2011 says one turbine was cooperative-owned and the other utility-owned at that time, with a third turbine still planned for the following year. No later evidence found of a subsequent equity transfer changing the 2-turbine/1-turbine split.


wind_farm_id: 6439
canonical_id: 01980f70-902a-482d-94d6-8e006a4a536a
wind_farm_name: Avedøre Holme
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 42106.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – existing offshore wind farms
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
DEA lists Avedøre Holme under existing offshore wind farms and describes the 3 turbines as installed in 2009/2010/2011. Hvidovre Municipality says the three offshore turbines are in place and identifies current operators. This fits Boundary Layer status Operational.


wind_farm_id: 6439
canonical_id: 01980f70-902a-482d-94d6-8e006a4a536a
wind_farm_name: Avedøre Holme
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 10.8 MW
resolved_value: 10.8 MW
research_value: 10.8 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42107.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aved%C3%B8re_Holme_Offshore_Wind_Farm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Wikipedia project page
source_of_record_url: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aved%C3%B8re_Holme_Offshore_Wind_Farm
source_of_record_licence: CC BY-SA
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Web sources consistently support 3 turbines at 3.6 MW each, giving 10.8 MW total. Municipality page confirms 3.6 MW pr. mølle; DEA confirms 3 offshore demonstration turbines; the project profile on Wikipedia also matches 10.8 MW, but the table value is supported without relying on it.


wind_farm_id: 6439
canonical_id: 01980f70-902a-482d-94d6-8e006a4a536a
wind_farm_name: Avedøre Holme
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – existing offshore wind farms
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No openly accessible regulator/owner source located that explicitly states a separate export capacity or MEC for this very small nearshore demonstration project. Available web material supports installed capacity only.


wind_farm_id: 6439
canonical_id: 01980f70-902a-482d-94d6-8e006a4a536a
wind_farm_name: Avedøre Holme
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: SWT-3.6-120
resolved_value: SWT-3.6-120
research_value: SWT-3.6-120
resolved_fact_id: 42108.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources are mixed: Hvidovre cooperative pages mention Siemens 3.6 MW with 120 m rotor, but one page also says SWT-3.6-107 despite describing the oversized 120 m rotor. Because project-specific web evidence is ambiguous on the exact model code, the linked EuroWindWakes turbine dataset fallback is used as required: Siemens SWT-3.6-120.


wind_farm_id: 6439
canonical_id: 01980f70-902a-482d-94d6-8e006a4a536a
wind_farm_name: Avedøre Holme
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens
resolved_value: Siemens
research_value: Siemens
resolved_fact_id: 9029.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific sources consistently identify Siemens turbines. This also matches the linked EuroWindWakes fallback row.


wind_farm_id: 6439
canonical_id: 01980f70-902a-482d-94d6-8e006a4a536a
wind_farm_name: Avedøre Holme
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 3.6
resolved_value: 3.6
research_value: 3.6 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9339.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Hvidovre Municipality states 3,6 MW pr. mølle and cooperative materials also describe 3.6 MW turbines. This aligns with the EuroWindWakes linked turbine metadata fallback.


wind_farm_id: 6439
canonical_id: 01980f70-902a-482d-94d6-8e006a4a536a
wind_farm_name: Avedøre Holme
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 120
resolved_value: 120
research_value: 120 m
resolved_fact_id: 9494.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Multiple project-specific sources state a 120 m rotor/blade diameter. This also matches the linked EuroWindWakes row.


wind_farm_id: 6439
canonical_id: 01980f70-902a-482d-94d6-8e006a4a536a
wind_farm_name: Avedøre Holme
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 93
resolved_value: 93
research_value: 93 m
resolved_fact_id: 9649.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Hub height is inconsistently described in project webpages: municipality gives tower height 88 m, cooperative English page gives tower ... 93.5 meters, and overall tip height is around 151–155 m. Because project-specific web evidence is inconsistent and hub height must not be inferred from generic turbine pages, the linked EuroWindWakes fallback is used: 93 m.


wind_farm_id: 6439
canonical_id: 01980f70-902a-482d-94d6-8e006a4a536a
wind_farm_name: Avedøre Holme
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 3
resolved_value: 3
research_value: 3
resolved_fact_id: 48491.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 3 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Danish Energy Agency – existing offshore wind farms
research_source_type: regulator
research_source_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
DEA explicitly says permission was granted for 3 demonstration turbines and that the third was established in 2011; municipality also says De tre havvindmøller. This aligns with the non-web validation signals from EMODnet and EuroWindWakes, both of which also indicate 3 turbines.


wind_farm_id: 6439
canonical_id: 01980f70-902a-482d-94d6-8e006a4a536a
wind_farm_name: Avedøre Holme
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Gravity base
resolved_value: Gravity base
research_value: Gravity base
resolved_fact_id: 42114.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://keep.eu/api/project-attachment/6222/get_file/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: KEEP project attachment
source_of_record_url: https://keep.eu/api/project-attachment/6222/get_file/
source_of_record_licence: public document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Openly accessible project-specific web evidence was not found that clearly names the foundation type. An accessible EU Interreg/KEEP attachment lists Avedøre Holme with Foundation Grounded: Gravity-Base; a scholarly review snippet also groups Avedøre Holme among gravity foundation projects. Treated as moderately supported rather than fully authoritative.


wind_farm_id: 6439
canonical_id: 01980f70-902a-482d-94d6-8e006a4a536a
wind_farm_name: Avedøre Holme
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 18/11/2008
resolved_value: 18/11/2008
research_value: 18/11/2008
resolved_fact_id: 42115.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – existing offshore wind farms
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
DEA states permission for erection of 3 large demonstration offshore turbines was granted on 18 November 2008. Earlier 19/11/2008 reporting says the project had received establishment consent from the Danish Energy Agency.


wind_farm_id: 6439
canonical_id: 01980f70-902a-482d-94d6-8e006a4a536a
wind_farm_name: Avedøre Holme
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.maritimedanmark.dk/nye-vindmoller-pa-avedore-holme
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: MaritimeDanmark
source_of_record_url: https://www.maritimedanmark.dk/nye-vindmoller-pa-avedore-holme
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible official source found that explicitly identifies a separate FID date for this demonstration project. Construction start expectation in January 2009 is reported, but that is not the same as a documented FID.


wind_farm_id: 6439
canonical_id: 01980f70-902a-482d-94d6-8e006a4a536a
wind_farm_name: Avedøre Holme
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/11/2009
resolved_value: 01/11/2009
research_value: 01/11/2009
resolved_fact_id: 42116.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://hvidovrevindmollelaug.dk/english/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Hvidovre Vindmøllelaug English page
source_of_record_url: https://hvidovrevindmollelaug.dk/english/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Hvidovre Vindmøllelaug states its turbine has produced electricity since November 2009. DEA says two turbines were installed during 2009. Using the month-year normalization rule, first power is recorded as 01/11/2009.


wind_farm_id: 6439
canonical_id: 01980f70-902a-482d-94d6-8e006a4a536a
wind_farm_name: Avedøre Holme
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2011-12-01
resolved_value: 2011-12-01
research_value: 01/12/2011
resolved_fact_id: 9804.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
DEA states the third turbine was established in 2011 and the linked EuroWindWakes row gives a commissioning date of 01/12/2011. Because project-specific web evidence supports only the year for final completion, the linked EuroWindWakes date is used as the required fallback for a normalized full-commissioning date.


wind_farm_id: 6440
canonical_id: bf98c1f4-1fe2-4cd3-a797-13893f53878e
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev III
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Horns Rev 3; alternative/historic naming found in some sources: Horns Rev III, Horns Reef 3
research_value: Horns Rev 3; alternative/historic naming found in some sources: Horns Rev III, Horns Reef 3
citation_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/horns-rev-3/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall power plant page
source_of_record_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/horns-rev-3/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Primary official/operator and regulator sources use Horns Rev 3. Some OEM/media material uses Horns Reef 3, but this refers to the same project rather than a different phase.


wind_farm_id: 6440
canonical_id: bf98c1f4-1fe2-4cd3-a797-13893f53878e
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev III
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Developer: Vattenfall; current owner: Vattenfall AB group (100%); operator: Vattenfall
resolved_value: Developer: Vattenfall; current owner: Vattenfall AB group (100%); operator: Vattenfall
research_value: Developer: Vattenfall; current owner: Vattenfall AB group (100%); operator: Vattenfall
resolved_fact_id: 42118.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/horns-rev-3/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall power plant page
source_of_record_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/horns-rev-3/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The freshest dated authoritative source relied on is Vattenfall Q1 2025 presentation, which still lists Horns Rev 3 in Vattenfall’s operated/owned offshore portfolio. Vattenfall’s project page states Vattenfall ownership share 100% and status In Operation.


wind_farm_id: 6440
canonical_id: bf98c1f4-1fe2-4cd3-a797-13893f53878e
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev III
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/horns-rev-3/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall power plant page
source_of_record_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/horns-rev-3/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Awarded to Vattenfall in 2015; concession/licence holder remained Vattenfall project company; current ownership confirmed as 100% Vattenfall

research_value:
Awarded to Vattenfall in 2015; concession/licence holder remained Vattenfall project company; current ownership confirmed as 100% Vattenfall

research_summary:
The freshest source date relied on for current ownership is Q1 2025 from Vattenfall. The Danish Energy Agency’s 2018 permit/licence press release states Vattenfall won the tender on 26/02/2015 on behalf of the then not yet incorporated project company, and Vattenfall’s current plant page states Vattenfall ownership share 100%. No credible newer source found indicating any later equity sale.


wind_farm_id: 6440
canonical_id: bf98c1f4-1fe2-4cd3-a797-13893f53878e
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev III
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 42119.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/horns-rev-3/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall power plant page
source_of_record_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/horns-rev-3/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Newer owner sources confirm the asset is operating: Vattenfall’s plant page says Status In Operation, and the 2025 Vattenfall portfolio presentation includes Horns Rev 3 as offshore capacity in operation.


wind_farm_id: 6440
canonical_id: bf98c1f4-1fe2-4cd3-a797-13893f53878e
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev III
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 407 MW
resolved_value: 407 MW
research_value: 407 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42120.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/horns-rev-3/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall power plant page
source_of_record_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/horns-rev-3/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Vattenfall’s current project page gives 407 MWe. Older build-phase sources sometimes round to 406 MW or give 406.7 MW based on 49 × 8.3 MW; for the project profile, 407 MW is the best-supported rounded installed capacity from the live operator page.


wind_farm_id: 6440
canonical_id: bf98c1f4-1fe2-4cd3-a797-13893f53878e
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev III
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 400 MW
resolved_value: 400 MW
research_value: 400 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42121.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/presse/horns-rev-3-havmoellepark-faar-tilladelse-og-bevilling-til-elproduktion
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency permit/licence press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/presse/horns-rev-3-havmoellepark-faar-tilladelse-og-bevilling-til-elproduktion
source_of_record_licence: public sector terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
An accessible Danish Energy Agency source now supports this cleanly: the permit/licence press release states Havmølleparken må maksimalt levere en effekt på 400 MW målt i tilslutningspunktet. This is the clearest accessible project-specific MEC/export-limit evidence.


wind_farm_id: 6440
canonical_id: bf98c1f4-1fe2-4cd3-a797-13893f53878e
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev III
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: V164-8.0 MW
resolved_value: V164-8.0 MW
research_value: V164-8.0 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42122.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources clearly confirm V164 platform use, but accessible official web evidence conflicts on whether to label the site as V164-8.3 MW or V164-8.0 MW. Per the required fallback rule, project-specific web evidence remained ambiguous on the exact model string, so the linked EuroWindWakes fallback value V164-8.0 MW is used here.


wind_farm_id: 6440
canonical_id: bf98c1f4-1fe2-4cd3-a797-13893f53878e
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev III
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas
resolved_value: Vestas
research_value: Vestas
resolved_fact_id: 9030.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Vattenfall’s live plant page lists Supplier Vestas. Historic build-phase OEM release was issued by MHI Vestas Offshore Wind; the corporate lineage now sits within Vestas branding, and the linked EuroWindWakes fallback also gives Vestas.


wind_farm_id: 6440
canonical_id: bf98c1f4-1fe2-4cd3-a797-13893f53878e
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev III
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 8
resolved_value: 8
research_value: 8 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9340.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources for Horns Rev 3 often state 8.3 MW turbines, but the linked project-level EuroWindWakes metadata requires fallback use where project-specific web evidence is inconclusive/ambiguous. Accordingly, the chosen value is the linked fallback 8 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6440
canonical_id: bf98c1f4-1fe2-4cd3-a797-13893f53878e
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev III
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 164
resolved_value: 164
research_value: 164 m
resolved_fact_id: 9495.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
This is project-specifically stated by Vattenfall in the 2018 construction update, and it also matches the linked EuroWindWakes fallback.


wind_farm_id: 6440
canonical_id: bf98c1f4-1fe2-4cd3-a797-13893f53878e
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev III
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 105
resolved_value: 105
research_value: 105 m
resolved_fact_id: 9650.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Accessible project-specific web sources reviewed did not clearly state hub height for this specific project. Per the mandatory fallback rule, the linked EuroWindWakes project turbine metadata value 105 m is used.


wind_farm_id: 6440
canonical_id: bf98c1f4-1fe2-4cd3-a797-13893f53878e
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev III
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 49
resolved_value: 49
research_value: 49
resolved_fact_id: 48492.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 49 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Vattenfall power plant page
research_source_type: owner/operator webpage
research_source_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/horns-rev-3/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Strongly confirmed by Vattenfall and Vestas. This aligns with the non-web validation signals provided: EMODnet hint 49 and EuroWindWakes linked-turbine count 49, so no discrepancy needs explaining.


wind_farm_id: 6440
canonical_id: bf98c1f4-1fe2-4cd3-a797-13893f53878e
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev III
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Steel monopile foundations
resolved_value: Steel monopile foundations
research_value: Steel monopile foundations
resolved_fact_id: 42128.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall foundations milestone page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/press-and-media/newsroom/2018/all-foundations-for-horns-rev-3-are-now-in-place

research_summary:
Vattenfall explicitly states the foundations are 40-50 metres long steel monopile units. The project’s technical/EIA material considered alternatives during planning, but the as-built official construction update confirms monopiles.

source_of_record_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/press-and-media/newsroom/2018/all-foundations-for-horns-rev-3-are-now-in-place


wind_farm_id: 6440
canonical_id: bf98c1f4-1fe2-4cd3-a797-13893f53878e
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev III
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 21/05/2015
resolved_value: 21/05/2015
research_value: 21/05/2015
resolved_fact_id: 42129.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/6074/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency indexed source referencing establishment permit
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/6074/download
source_of_record_licence: public sector terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
An accessible Danish Energy Agency source confirms the establishment-permit date directly via the indexed permit title text Tilladelse til etablering af elproduktionsanlægget Horns Rev 3 samt internt ledningsnet (etableringstilladelse) 21. maj 2015. This remains the best accessible regulatory date for consent/authorisation to establish the generating plant.


wind_farm_id: 6440
canonical_id: bf98c1f4-1fe2-4cd3-a797-13893f53878e
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev III
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 26/02/2015
resolved_value: 26/02/2015
research_value: 26/02/2015
resolved_fact_id: 42130.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/denmark-gets-cheaper-power-offshore-wind-turbines
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency tender result press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/denmark-gets-cheaper-power-offshore-wind-turbines
source_of_record_licence: public sector terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
A separate public FID announcement was not clearly accessible. The closest robust milestone is Vattenfall’s winning tender/concession on 26/02/2015, after which the project proceeded into contracted delivery and permitting. Chosen as the closest exact proxy and explained here because evidence for a separately published corporate FID date is weak.


wind_farm_id: 6440
canonical_id: bf98c1f4-1fe2-4cd3-a797-13893f53878e
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev III
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/12/2018
resolved_value: 01/12/2018
research_value: 01/12/2018
resolved_fact_id: 42131.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/horns-rev-3/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall power plant page
source_of_record_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/horns-rev-3/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Vattenfall’s project page says first turbines delivered electricity in December 2018; the Danish article says the first power reached customers over Christmas 2018. As only month-level precision is clearly supported in the accessible source set, the normalized table date is 01/12/2018.


wind_farm_id: 6440
canonical_id: bf98c1f4-1fe2-4cd3-a797-13893f53878e
wind_farm_name: Horns Rev III
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2019-08-01
resolved_value: 2019-08-01
research_value: 22/08/2019
resolved_fact_id: 9805.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Vattenfall inauguration release
research_source_type: owner/developer press release
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Vattenfall’s August 2019 inauguration release says the wind farm was ready to supply power and would be officially inaugurated on 22 August 2019; the live plant page also says inauguration was in August 2019. This is the best-supported accessible date for full commissioning/operations complete.

research_source_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/press-and-media/pressreleases/2019/hrh-the-crown-prince-of-denmark-inaugurates-horns-rev-3-offshore-wind-farm


wind_farm_id: 6441
canonical_id: c4550e98-bb55-447f-be4a-5ead34475ca5
wind_farm_name: Rodsand II
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Rødsand II / Rødsand 2 Offshore Wind Farm
research_value: Rødsand II / Rødsand 2 Offshore Wind Farm
citation_url: https://dk.rwe.com/en/projects-and-locations/rodsand-2-offshore-wind-farm/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE in Denmark project page
source_of_record_url: https://dk.rwe.com/en/projects-and-locations/rodsand-2-offshore-wind-farm/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The exact target identity is supported by RWE’s live project page and Danish Energy Agency material referring to the same built 207 MW project as “Rødsand II” / “Rødsand 2”. Alternative/historic naming in wider literature includes association with the nearby Nysted/Rødsand complex, but the assessed asset here is the separate 2010-built second phase/project.


wind_farm_id: 6441
canonical_id: c4550e98-bb55-447f-be4a-5ead34475ca5
wind_farm_name: Rodsand II
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 42133.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://andel.dk/roedsand-2/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Andel Rødsand 2 asset page
source_of_record_url: https://andel.dk/roedsand-2/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: E.ON Vind Sverige AB / E.ON Sverige AB; Current owners: Andel 80%, RWE 20%; Operator: RWE

resolved_value:
Developer: E.ON Vind Sverige AB / E.ON Sverige AB; Current owners: Andel 80%, RWE 20%; Operator: RWE

research_summary:
Historic development was by E.ON after the earlier consortium/tender phase collapsed and the project was retendered in 2008. Current ownership is reconciled across Andel and RWE: Andel states it bought 80% in 2013 and owns the project together with RWE, while RWE’s 01/12/2021 press release confirms “RWE share: 20%”; operator is RWE on current RWE/DEA pages. Freshest ownership evidence relied on: Andel page copyright 2025 and RWE dated 01/12/2021; freshest operator/status confirmation: DEA PDF published 2025 and RWE live project page.


wind_farm_id: 6441
canonical_id: c4550e98-bb55-447f-be4a-5ead34475ca5
wind_farm_name: Rodsand II
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/rodsand-ii-offshore-wind-farm-reopen-tenders
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency retender notice
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/en/press/rodsand-ii-offshore-wind-farm-reopen-tenders
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Initially consortium award (Energi E2, DONG Vind, E.ON Vind Sverige) before transfer to E.ON Vind; from 2013 Andel/SEAS-NVE acquired 80%, E.ON retained 20%; current split evidenced as Andel 80%, RWE 20%

research_value:
Initially consortium award (Energi E2, DONG Vind, E.ON Vind Sverige) before transfer to E.ON Vind; from 2013 Andel/SEAS-NVE acquired 80%, E.ON retained 20%; current split evidenced as Andel 80%, RWE 20%

research_summary:
DEA’s 07/02/2008 retender notice says the original winning consortium was Energi E2, DONG Vind and E.ON Vind Sverige, later turned over solely to E.ON Vind. FIH Partners’ 2013 transaction note says SEAS-NVE acquired 80% from E.ON and E.ON retained 20%. Current split is then corroborated by Andel’s current asset page and RWE’s 01/12/2021 press release. Freshest source date relied on for current split: RWE 01/12/2021 plus current Andel asset page.


wind_farm_id: 6441
canonical_id: c4550e98-bb55-447f-be4a-5ead34475ca5
wind_farm_name: Rodsand II
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 42134.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://dk.rwe.com/en/projects-and-locations/rodsand-2-offshore-wind-farm/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE in Denmark project page
source_of_record_url: https://dk.rwe.com/en/projects-and-locations/rodsand-2-offshore-wind-farm/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
RWE states “Project status: in operation,” and the DEA 2025 screening states Rødsand 2 is operated by RWE and has been operating since 2010. This cleanly maps to Boundary Layer status Operational.


wind_farm_id: 6441
canonical_id: c4550e98-bb55-447f-be4a-5ead34475ca5
wind_farm_name: Rodsand II
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 207 MW
resolved_value: 207 MW
research_value: 207 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42136.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://dk.rwe.com/en/projects-and-locations/rodsand-2-offshore-wind-farm/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE in Denmark project page
source_of_record_url: https://dk.rwe.com/en/projects-and-locations/rodsand-2-offshore-wind-farm/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The blocked Semco source was replaced with RWE’s live owner/operator page. No separate project-specific MEC label was found on open official project pages, but the best accessible authoritative evidence continues to support 207 MW as the project/export-capacity-equivalent figure via the installed-capacity statement. Chosen as the best-supported open value, while noting it is not distinctly labelled “MEC” on the replacement source.


wind_farm_id: 6441
canonical_id: c4550e98-bb55-447f-be4a-5ead34475ca5
wind_farm_name: Rodsand II
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: SWT-2.3-93
resolved_value: SWT-2.3-93
research_value: SWT-2.3-93
resolved_fact_id: 42137.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.cas.ens.dk/english/certification/list-project-certificates
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency certification register
source_of_record_url: https://www.cas.ens.dk/english/certification/list-project-certificates
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web evidence confirms Siemens 2.3 MW / 93 m rotor turbines, and the DEA certification register explicitly lists Rødsand 2 as SWT-2.3-93.


wind_farm_id: 6441
canonical_id: c4550e98-bb55-447f-be4a-5ead34475ca5
wind_farm_name: Rodsand II
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens
resolved_value: Siemens
research_value: Siemens
resolved_fact_id: 9031.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Danish Energy Agency certification register
research_source_type: regulator register
research_source_url: https://www.cas.ens.dk/english/certification/list-project-certificates
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
RWE states the turbines are 2.3 MW units with 93 m rotors; the DEA certification register ties the project to the SWT-2.3-93 platform from Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy A/S.


wind_farm_id: 6441
canonical_id: c4550e98-bb55-447f-be4a-5ead34475ca5
wind_farm_name: Rodsand II
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2.3
resolved_value: 2.3
research_value: 2.3 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9341.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: RWE in Denmark project page
research_source_type: owner/operator webpage
research_source_url: https://dk.rwe.com/en/projects-and-locations/rodsand-2-offshore-wind-farm/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
RWE and Andel both explicitly state 2.3 MW per turbine; this matches the DEA certification register.


wind_farm_id: 6441
canonical_id: c4550e98-bb55-447f-be4a-5ead34475ca5
wind_farm_name: Rodsand II
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 68.5
resolved_value: 68.5
research_value: 68.5 m
resolved_fact_id: 9651.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
RWE explicitly gives “tower height” as 68.5 metres; project-specific web corroboration was limited, so this aligns with the linked EuroWindWakes fallback hub-height value of 68.5 m and is used confidently.


wind_farm_id: 6441
canonical_id: c4550e98-bb55-447f-be4a-5ead34475ca5
wind_farm_name: Rodsand II
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 90
resolved_value: 90
research_value: 90
resolved_fact_id: 48493.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 90 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: RWE in Denmark project page
research_source_type: owner/operator webpage
research_source_url: https://dk.rwe.com/en/projects-and-locations/rodsand-2-offshore-wind-farm/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
RWE, Andel, Aarsleff and DEA all support 90 turbines. This aligns with the non-web validation signals provided in context: EMODnet hint 90 and EuroWindWakes linked-turbine count 90.


wind_farm_id: 6441
canonical_id: c4550e98-bb55-447f-be4a-5ead34475ca5
wind_farm_name: Rodsand II
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Gravity base concrete caissons
resolved_value: Gravity base concrete caissons
research_value: Gravity base concrete caissons
resolved_fact_id: 42143.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Per Aarsleff project news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.aarsleff.com/about-aarsleff/news/news/foundations-for-the-r%C3%B8dsand-2-offshore-wind-farm

research_summary:
Aarsleff’s project page is project-specific and explicit: 90 concrete foundations made as concrete caissons with ballast. This is consistent with other secondary engineering references describing gravity-base foundations.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.aarsleff.com/about-aarsleff/news/news/foundations-for-the-r%C3%B8dsand-2-offshore-wind-farm


wind_farm_id: 6441
canonical_id: c4550e98-bb55-447f-be4a-5ead34475ca5
wind_farm_name: Rodsand II
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 06/05/2008
resolved_value: 06/05/2008
research_value: 06/05/2008
resolved_fact_id: 42144.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency existing offshore wind farms page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
DEA’s existing offshore wind farms page explicitly references the “establishment permit for Rødsand II from 6 May 2008.” This is used as the clearest open official consent/establishment milestone.


wind_farm_id: 6441
canonical_id: c4550e98-bb55-447f-be4a-5ead34475ca5
wind_farm_name: Rodsand II
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/04/2008
resolved_value: 01/04/2008
research_value: 01/04/2008
resolved_fact_id: 42145.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/5138/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency wind integration/tender table PDF
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/5138/download
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
A distinct publicly labelled “FID” was not found on accessible official project pages. The closest evidenced invest/build-go milestone is the April 2008 winning bid/tender award shown in DEA material, so 01/04/2008 is used as the nearest defensible FID-equivalent and the nuance should be noted.


wind_farm_id: 6441
canonical_id: c4550e98-bb55-447f-be4a-5ead34475ca5
wind_farm_name: Rodsand II
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 03/08/2010
resolved_value: 03/08/2010
research_value: 03/08/2010
resolved_fact_id: 42146.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: windfair news report
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://w3.windfair.net/wind-energy/news/8226-denmark-s-rodsand-ii-offshore-wind-power-plant-begins-operations

research_summary:
Open project-specific official confirmation for “first power” was hard to find. Secondary open sources report the wind farm was ready / began supplying power on 03/08/2010, while official RWE states commissioning in October 2010. This is therefore used as first power, distinct from full commissioning.

source_of_record_url:
https://w3.windfair.net/wind-energy/news/8226-denmark-s-rodsand-ii-offshore-wind-power-plant-begins-operations


wind_farm_id: 6441
canonical_id: c4550e98-bb55-447f-be4a-5ead34475ca5
wind_farm_name: Rodsand II
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2010-10-01
resolved_value: 2010-10-01
research_value: 01/10/2010
resolved_fact_id: 9806.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: RWE in Denmark project page
research_source_type: owner/operator webpage
research_source_url: https://dk.rwe.com/en/projects-and-locations/rodsand-2-offshore-wind-farm/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
RWE explicitly says Rødsand II “was commissioned in October 2010.” Because only month/year is confirmed on the main official page, the table normalizes this to 01/10/2010. Siemens/E.ON-era reporting from 12/10/2010 supports October 2010 completion/inauguration.


wind_farm_id: 6442
canonical_id: 127f1c56-53ec-4412-a391-171f2d823baa
wind_farm_name: Nordre Flint
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Nordre Flint Vindmøllepark; alternative name: Nordre Flint offshore wind farm
research_value: Nordre Flint Vindmøllepark; alternative name: Nordre Flint offshore wind farm
citation_url: https://ens.dk/presse/hofor-faar-forundersoegelsestilladelser-til-havvindmoelleprojekter-i-oeresund
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/presse/hofor-faar-forundersoegelsestilladelser-til-havvindmoelleprojekter-i-oeresund
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Danish Energy Agency and HOFOR sources refer to the project as Nordre Flint Vindmøllepark / Nordre Flint Havvindmøllepark in Øresund east of Saltholm. English secondary sources use “Nordre Flint Offshore Wind Farm.”


wind_farm_id: 6442
canonical_id: 127f1c56-53ec-4412-a391-171f2d823baa
wind_farm_name: Nordre Flint
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 42148.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/presse/hofor-faar-forundersoegelsestilladelser-til-havvindmoelleprojekter-i-oeresund
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/presse/hofor-faar-forundersoegelsestilladelser-til-havvindmoelleprojekter-i-oeresund
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: HOFOR / HOFOR Vind A/S; current owner(s): Not confirmed beyond HOFOR group involvement; equity partners / percentages: Not confirmed; operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: HOFOR / HOFOR Vind A/S; current owner(s): Not confirmed beyond HOFOR group involvement; equity partners / percentages: Not confirmed; operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
The freshest dated authoritative source relied on is the Danish Energy Agency’s open-door information page (published 2024-era page version surfaced by ENS search result; page text confirms case processing resumed for Nordre Flint in March 2023). HOFOR’s live site still refers to HOFOR’s two planned offshore wind farms in Øresund, Aflandshage and Nordre Flint. I found no newer dated official JV or operator page reconciling a current equity split, so ownership percentages and operator remain Not confirmed.


