# wind_farm_dossier_fields

wind_farm_id: 6714
canonical_id: 282ba829-8eaa-40e3-a01a-e8fb1f40758c
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (West)
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 406 MW
resolved_value: 406 MW
research_value: 406 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35389.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cefas 2022 Chemicals in Offshore Wind Farms
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Open dataset/regulatory-style sources that split Hornsea One into West/Centre/East each show 406 MW for the West block. This reconciles arithmetically with the full 1,218 MW Hornsea One project.


wind_farm_id: 6714
canonical_id: 282ba829-8eaa-40e3-a01a-e8fb1f40758c
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (West)
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/press-release/ofgem-awards-licence-grid-link-worlds-largest-wind-farm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ofgem Hornsea One OFTO licence award
source_of_record_url: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/press-release/ofgem-awards-licence-grid-link-worlds-largest-wind-farm
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Open web sources reviewed clearly confirm installed capacity for Hornsea 1 (West), but not a block-specific MEC. Available official web sources tend to describe export/transmission for the combined Hornsea One project rather than a West-only export limit.


wind_farm_id: 6714
canonical_id: 282ba829-8eaa-40e3-a01a-e8fb1f40758c
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (West)
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: SWT-7.0-154
resolved_value: SWT-7.0-154
research_value: SWT-7.0-154
resolved_fact_id: 35390.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific public web evidence ties the full Hornsea One project to Siemens Gamesa 7 MW / SWT-7.0-154 turbines, but I did not find an open authoritative page explicitly assigning the model to the West block alone. Per the required fallback rule, the linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was therefore used for the block-specific value.


wind_farm_id: 6714
canonical_id: 282ba829-8eaa-40e3-a01a-e8fb1f40758c
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (West)
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens Gamesa
resolved_value: Siemens Gamesa
research_value: Siemens Gamesa
resolved_fact_id: 9140.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Full-project web sources confirm Hornsea One uses Siemens Gamesa 7 MW turbines; project-specific West-only OEM evidence remained ambiguous, so the linked EuroWindWakes fallback was used for the block-level row.


wind_farm_id: 6714
canonical_id: 282ba829-8eaa-40e3-a01a-e8fb1f40758c
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (West)
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 7
resolved_value: 7
research_value: 7 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9450.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Cross-checking shows the full Hornsea One project used 174 seven-megawatt turbines; because the web evidence is at whole-project level rather than West-block-only, the linked EuroWindWakes turbine row was used as the required fallback for the sub-project value.


wind_farm_id: 6714
canonical_id: 282ba829-8eaa-40e3-a01a-e8fb1f40758c
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (West)
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 154
resolved_value: 154
research_value: 154 m
resolved_fact_id: 9605.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Public web material links Hornsea One with the SWT-7.0-154 platform, implying 154 m rotor diameter, but not explicitly for the West block. Per instruction, I did not infer the block-specific value from a generic turbine page; instead I used the linked EuroWindWakes fallback, which matches the project-level context.


wind_farm_id: 6714
canonical_id: 282ba829-8eaa-40e3-a01a-e8fb1f40758c
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (West)
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 115
resolved_value: 115
research_value: 115 m
resolved_fact_id: 9760.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
I did not find open authoritative web evidence explicitly giving West-block hub height. Per the required rule, the linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was used as the mandatory fallback. Some public articles mention overall turbine tip height around 190–200 m, but those do not confirm hub height.


wind_farm_id: 6714
canonical_id: 282ba829-8eaa-40e3-a01a-e8fb1f40758c
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (West)
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 58
resolved_value: 58
research_value: 58
resolved_fact_id: 47145.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 58 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Cefas 2022 Chemicals in Offshore Wind Farms
research_source_type: government/open report
research_source_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Open sources that separate Hornsea 1 into West/Centre/East each give 58 turbines for the West block. This aligns with the non-web validation signals provided: current database winner candidate 58, EuroWindWakes linked-turbine count 58, and EMODnet hint 58. The full Hornsea One project totals 174 turbines, so the West/Centre/East split explains the lower block figure.


wind_farm_id: 6714
canonical_id: 282ba829-8eaa-40e3-a01a-e8fb1f40758c
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (West)
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Jacket
resolved_value: Jacket
research_value: Jacket
resolved_fact_id: 35396.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cefas 2022 Chemicals in Offshore Wind Farms
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
For the West block specifically, the strongest open source found is the Cefas table, which lists Hornsea 1 (West) ... jacket. Hornsea One as a whole used mixed foundations across sub-areas, so using a block-specific source matters here.


wind_farm_id: 6714
canonical_id: 282ba829-8eaa-40e3-a01a-e8fb1f40758c
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (West)
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 10/12/2014
resolved_value: 10/12/2014
research_value: 10/12/2014
resolved_fact_id: 35397.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hornsea-one-offshore-wind-farm-variation-4
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: MMO Hornsea One Offshore Wind Farm – Variation 4
source_of_record_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hornsea-one-offshore-wind-farm-variation-4
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The DCO for Hornsea One Offshore Wind Farm was granted on 10 December 2014. That consent covers the project including the western generating station area.


wind_farm_id: 6714
canonical_id: 282ba829-8eaa-40e3-a01a-e8fb1f40758c
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (West)
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hornsea-one-offshore-wind-farm-variation-4
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: MMO Hornsea One Offshore Wind Farm – Variation 4
source_of_record_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hornsea-one-offshore-wind-farm-variation-4
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I did not find a clean open official source giving a dated FID specifically for Hornsea 1 (West) or even for Hornsea Project One in a directly accessible authoritative page. Rather than infer from contract award timing, this remains not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6714
canonical_id: 282ba829-8eaa-40e3-a01a-e8fb1f40758c
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (West)
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/01/2019
resolved_value: 01/01/2019
research_value: 01/01/2019
resolved_fact_id: 35398.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://orsted.co.uk/energy-solutions/offshore-wind/our-wind-farms/hornsea1
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted Hornsea 1 project page
source_of_record_url: https://orsted.co.uk/energy-solutions/offshore-wind/our-wind-farms/hornsea1
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Open sources reviewed clearly confirm final installation and full operation timing, but not an easily accessible authoritative first-power date for the West block. The year 2019 is supported for the project entering operation; using the normalization rule for year-only confirmation gives 01/01/2019.


wind_farm_id: 6714
canonical_id: 282ba829-8eaa-40e3-a01a-e8fb1f40758c
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (West)
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2019-12-01
resolved_value: 2019-12-01
research_value: 01/01/2019
resolved_fact_id: 9915.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: MMO Hornsea One Offshore Wind Farm – Variation 4
research_source_type: regulator webpage
research_source_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hornsea-one-offshore-wind-farm-variation-4
research_source_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
The freshest accessible official project/regulatory pages say Hornsea One became fully operational in 2019. They do not provide a day/month on the pages reviewed, so the normalized table date is 01/01/2019.


wind_farm_id: 6715
canonical_id: a7c5c15e-73fa-450c-a84b-233fb6ebf346
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (Centre)
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Hornsea 1 (Centre); part of Hornsea Project One / Hornsea One
research_value: Hornsea 1 (Centre); part of Hornsea Project One / Hornsea One
citation_url: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/docs/2018/10/hornsea_one_project_presentation.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ofgem Hornsea Project One presentation
source_of_record_url: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/docs/2018/10/hornsea_one_project_presentation.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Phase/name ambiguity resolved first: public web sources describe the built asset as Hornsea Project One / Hornsea One with three offshore substations: East, Central and West. The database row name “Hornsea 1 (Centre)” aligns with the Central block of that built project.


wind_farm_id: 6715
canonical_id: a7c5c15e-73fa-450c-a84b-233fb6ebf346
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (Centre)
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35329.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted Brookfield transaction announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Ørsted. Current owners for the full Hornsea One project: Ørsted 37.55%, Brookfield 12.45%, and Global Infrastructure Partners 50%. Operator: Ørsted.

resolved_value:
Developer: Ørsted. Current owners for the full Hornsea One project: Ørsted 37.55%, Brookfield 12.45%, and Global Infrastructure Partners 50%. Operator: Ørsted.

citation_url:
https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2024/10/orsted-divests-share-of-four-uk-offshore-wind-farm-1410845011

research_summary:
Repaired with source-of-record-friendly owner/operator evidence. Ørsted’s 30/10/2024 transaction announcement states Brookfield will acquire 12.45 % minority stakes in Hornsea 1, and Ørsted’s 2025 annual reporting states “We retain a 37.55% equity ownership stake” in the wind farms after the December 2024 completion. For the long-standing 50% partner, Ørsted’s 26/11/2018 completion announcement states it completed divestment of 50% of the Hornsea 1 Offshore Wind Farm to Global Infrastructure Partners (GIP). Operator evidence remains Ørsted, which states it will provide long-term O&M services from Grimsby / East Coast Hub. Because no project-specific page found explicitly breaks out ownership only for the Centre sub-block, the ownership answer is for Hornsea One overall, not a separate legal entity for “Centre”.

source_of_record_url:
https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2024/10/orsted-divests-share-of-four-uk-offshore-wind-farm-1410845011


wind_farm_id: 6715
canonical_id: a7c5c15e-73fa-450c-a84b-233fb6ebf346
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (Centre)
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://orsted.com/en/company-announcement-list/2018/09/1809936
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted sale of 50% of Hornsea 1 to GIP
source_of_record_url: https://orsted.com/en/company-announcement-list/2018/09/1809936
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Initially SMart Wind / Siemens Financial Services / Mainstream context; Ørsted took full ownership in 2015; Ørsted sold 50% of Hornsea 1 to Global Infrastructure Partners in 2018; in 2024 Ørsted sold a further 12.45% minority stake to Brookfield, leaving Ørsted at 37.55%

research_value:
Initially SMart Wind / Siemens Financial Services / Mainstream context; Ørsted took full ownership in 2015; Ørsted sold 50% of Hornsea 1 to Global Infrastructure Partners in 2018; in 2024 Ørsted sold a further 12.45% minority stake to Brookfield, leaving Ørsted at 37.55%

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on for the latest step is 30/10/2024 (Ørsted news) plus February 2025 (Ørsted annual report 2024). For earlier history, Ørsted’s 2018 divestment announcement states sale of 50% to GIP; Ørsted’s green-bond investor letter states FID followed Ørsted taking full ownership from SMart Wind in 2015.


wind_farm_id: 6715
canonical_id: a7c5c15e-73fa-450c-a84b-233fb6ebf346
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (Centre)
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 35330.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://orsted.com/en/company-announcement-list/2021/02/2168747
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted annual report 2020 announcement
source_of_record_url: https://orsted.com/en/company-announcement-list/2021/02/2168747
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The database context says Operational; web sources confirm the parent project is long in operation. Ørsted’s 2019/2020 materials show first power in February 2019 and expected completion by Q1 2020; Ørsted’s 2020/2021 reporting discusses Hornsea 1 as an operating asset, and the project summary is written as an operational wind farm. Closest exact Boundary Layer label is Operational.


wind_farm_id: 6715
canonical_id: a7c5c15e-73fa-450c-a84b-233fb6ebf346
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (Centre)
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 406 MW
resolved_value: 406 MW
research_value: 406 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35331.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/docs/2018/10/hornsea_one_project_presentation.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ofgem Hornsea Project One presentation
source_of_record_url: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/docs/2018/10/hornsea_one_project_presentation.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The row being validated is the Centre section. Public project sources describe Hornsea One as 1,218 MW across three offshore substations / circuits. The database value 406 MW is consistent with splitting the built project into three approximately equal sections (1,218 / 3 = 406). No authoritative web page found explicitly labels a separate “Centre” capacity, so the selected value follows the project segmentation implied by the web evidence and matches the authoritative row metadata.


wind_farm_id: 6715
canonical_id: a7c5c15e-73fa-450c-a84b-233fb6ebf346
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (Centre)
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ofgem Hornsea Project One transmission cost assessment page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/publications/offshore-transmission-cost-assessment-hornsea-project-one-transmission-assets

research_summary:
Accessible web sources clearly confirm the full-project transmission arrangement and 1.2 GW-scale grid link, but I did not find an authoritative accessible source explicitly stating a separate MEC for the Centre block. To avoid conflating gross installed capacity with export capability, this remains Not confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/publications/offshore-transmission-cost-assessment-hornsea-project-one-transmission-assets


wind_farm_id: 6715
canonical_id: a7c5c15e-73fa-450c-a84b-233fb6ebf346
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (Centre)
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: SWT-7.0-154
resolved_value: SWT-7.0-154
research_value: SWT-7.0-154
resolved_fact_id: 35332.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted Green Bonds Investor Letter
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://orsted.com/-/media/www/docs/corp/com/sustainability/orsted_green_bonds_investor_letter_2017.ashx?hash=dc2e888c81f771cd1fbc5e877c6bd883&la=en

research_summary:
Project-specific Hornsea One sources confirm the parent project uses Siemens Gamesa SWT-7.0-154 turbines. That is also the linked EuroWindWakes turbine row, so no conflict.

source_of_record_url:
https://orsted.com/-/media/www/docs/corp/com/sustainability/orsted_green_bonds_investor_letter_2017.ashx?hash=dc2e888c81f771cd1fbc5e877c6bd883&la=en


wind_farm_id: 6715
canonical_id: a7c5c15e-73fa-450c-a84b-233fb6ebf346
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (Centre)
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 7
resolved_value: 7
research_value: 7 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9451.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Ørsted first power news
research_source_type: owner news
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific Hornsea One sources explicitly state 174 Siemens Gamesa 7 MW turbines for the parent project; the linked EuroWindWakes row also gives 7 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6715
canonical_id: a7c5c15e-73fa-450c-a84b-233fb6ebf346
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (Centre)
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 154
resolved_value: 154
research_value: 154 m
resolved_fact_id: 9606.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Hornsea One project-specific web sources identify the turbine model SWT-7.0-154, which embeds the 154 m rotor class; the linked EuroWindWakes row explicitly gives 154 m and is the required fallback for turbine-specific metadata where direct project-specific explicit wording is sparse. Used here with dataset fallback support.


wind_farm_id: 6715
canonical_id: a7c5c15e-73fa-450c-a84b-233fb6ebf346
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (Centre)
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 115
resolved_value: 115
research_value: 115 m
resolved_fact_id: 9761.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific accessible web evidence for Hornsea 1 Centre hub height was inconclusive. Per the required rule, I used the linked EuroWindWakes fallback value: 115 m.


wind_farm_id: 6715
canonical_id: a7c5c15e-73fa-450c-a84b-233fb6ebf346
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (Centre)
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 58
resolved_value: 58
research_value: 58
resolved_fact_id: 47146.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 58 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Ofgem Hornsea Project One presentation
research_source_type: regulator presentation
research_source_url: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/docs/2018/10/hornsea_one_project_presentation.pdf
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
The row being validated is the Centre section. Web sources confirm the parent Hornsea One project has 174 turbines and three offshore substations / sections (East, Central, West). The row value 58 is therefore consistent with the central section. This also aligns with the non-web validation signals provided: database winner 58, EuroWindWakes linked count 58, EMODnet hint 58.


wind_farm_id: 6715
canonical_id: a7c5c15e-73fa-450c-a84b-233fb6ebf346
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (Centre)
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile
resolved_value: Monopile
research_value: Monopile
resolved_fact_id: 35338.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/docs/2018/10/hornsea_one_project_presentation.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ofgem Hornsea Project One presentation
source_of_record_url: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/docs/2018/10/hornsea_one_project_presentation.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific sources explicitly state Hornsea Project One turbines are on monopile foundations; industry reporting also confirms all 174 foundations were monopiles.


wind_farm_id: 6715
canonical_id: a7c5c15e-73fa-450c-a84b-233fb6ebf346
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (Centre)
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 10/12/2014
resolved_value: 10/12/2014
research_value: 10/12/2014
resolved_fact_id: 35339.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/3331/pdfs/uksi_20143331_en.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: The Hornsea One Offshore Wind Farm Order 2014
source_of_record_url: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/3331/pdfs/uksi_20143331_en.pdf
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / legislation.gov.uk terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The Development Consent Order for Hornsea One Offshore Wind Farm was made on 10 December 2014. This is project-level consent; no separate Centre-only consent date was found.


wind_farm_id: 6715
canonical_id: a7c5c15e-73fa-450c-a84b-233fb6ebf346
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (Centre)
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/02/2016
resolved_value: 01/02/2016
research_value: 01/02/2016
resolved_fact_id: 35340.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted Green Bonds Investor Letter
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Ørsted states it took FID on Hornsea Project One in February 2016; only month/year was clearly confirmed, so normalized to 01/02/2016.


wind_farm_id: 6715
canonical_id: a7c5c15e-73fa-450c-a84b-233fb6ebf346
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (Centre)
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 15/02/2019
resolved_value: 15/02/2019
research_value: 15/02/2019
resolved_fact_id: 35341.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted first power news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Ørsted’s dated project news states Hornsea 1 generated first power on 15 February 2019. This milestone is at project level rather than Centre-only block level.


wind_farm_id: 6715
canonical_id: a7c5c15e-73fa-450c-a84b-233fb6ebf346
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (Centre)
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2019-12-01
resolved_value: 2019-12-01
research_value: 01/12/2019
resolved_fact_id: 9916.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Evidence points to late-2019 commissioning of the parent project. Ørsted’s 2019 annual-report transcript states “Late December we commissioned ... Hornsea 1”, while the linked EuroWindWakes row gives commissioning date December 2019. Using the required normalization for month-level evidence, I record 01/12/2019 and note the wording nuance.


wind_farm_id: 6716
canonical_id: b6220494-3540-4a7d-9174-e57d077e2595
wind_farm_name: East Anglia ONE
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: East Anglia ONE
research_value: East Anglia ONE
citation_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/east-anglia/east-anglia-one
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower Renewables project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/east-anglia/east-anglia-one
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official project name is East Anglia ONE. Historic wider-zone context sometimes refers to the earlier East Anglia Array concept, but the built project assessed here is the standalone East Anglia ONE phase.


wind_farm_id: 6716
canonical_id: b6220494-3540-4a7d-9174-e57d077e2595
wind_farm_name: East Anglia ONE
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35343.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/documents/d/guest/ea1_2024_accounts
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: East Anglia One Limited 2024 accounts
source_of_record_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/documents/d/guest/ea1_2024_accounts
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: ScottishPower Renewables. Current owners: ScottishPower Renewables (UK) Limited 60%; Bilbao Offshore Holding Limited 40%. Operator: ScottishPower Renewables / East Anglia One Limited.

resolved_value:
Developer: ScottishPower Renewables. Current owners: ScottishPower Renewables (UK) Limited 60%; Bilbao Offshore Holding Limited 40%. Operator: ScottishPower Renewables / East Anglia One Limited.

research_summary:
ScottishPower’s project page identifies the project as a joint venture between ScottishPower Renewables and Bilbao Offshore Holding Limited. The freshest authoritative source relied on is the East Anglia One Limited 2024 accounts, signed 23/09/2025, which states SPRUKL owns 60% and BOHL 40%, and describes the company as operator of the wind farm.


wind_farm_id: 6716
canonical_id: b6220494-3540-4a7d-9174-e57d077e2595
wind_farm_name: East Anglia ONE
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Green Investment Group update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Initially developed by ScottishPower Renewables; 40% sold to Macquarie Green Investment Group in 2019 via Bilbao Offshore Holding Limited; by 01/05/2024 Macquarie had agreed to divest 10% to NTR/DBJ investors while retaining 10%; by 03/04/2025 Octopus acquired a minority indirect interest from Macquarie. Current top-level project-company ownership still reconciles as 60% SPRUKL / 40% BOHL.

research_value:
Initially developed by ScottishPower Renewables; 40% sold to Macquarie Green Investment Group in 2019 via Bilbao Offshore Holding Limited; by 01/05/2024 Macquarie had agreed to divest 10% to NTR/DBJ investors while retaining 10%; by 03/04/2025 Octopus acquired a minority indirect interest from Macquarie. Current top-level project-company ownership still reconciles as 60% SPRUKL / 40% BOHL.

citation_url:
https://www.greeninvestmentgroup.com/en/news/2024/macquarie-asset-management-divests-east-anglia-one-stake.html

research_summary:
Freshest source date used for current project-company ownership is 23/09/2025 (EA1 2024 accounts). Ownership-history sources dated 01/05/2024 and 03/04/2025 show stake changes within Macquarie/BOHL’s indirect holding structure, but do not supersede the project-company cap table in the accounts; therefore the reconciled current direct ownership remains 60/40 at East Anglia One Limited level.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.greeninvestmentgroup.com/en/news/2024/macquarie-asset-management-divests-east-anglia-one-stake.html


wind_farm_id: 6716
canonical_id: b6220494-3540-4a7d-9174-e57d077e2595
wind_farm_name: East Anglia ONE
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 35344.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/east-anglia/east-anglia-one
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower Renewables project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/east-anglia/east-anglia-one
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
ScottishPower says all 102 turbines are fully operational; the company accounts for year-end 2024 describe the principal activity as operation of the 714 MW offshore wind farm. This matches the database validation context and there is no phase ambiguity with East Anglia ONE North/TWO/THREE.


wind_farm_id: 6716
canonical_id: b6220494-3540-4a7d-9174-e57d077e2595
wind_farm_name: East Anglia ONE
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 714 MW
resolved_value: 714 MW
research_value: 714 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35345.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/east-anglia/east-anglia-one
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower Renewables project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/east-anglia/east-anglia-one
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Capacity is consistently reported as 714 MW by ScottishPower, Siemens Gamesa, Iberdrola, and the company accounts.


wind_farm_id: 6716
canonical_id: b6220494-3540-4a7d-9174-e57d077e2595
wind_farm_name: East Anglia ONE
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 714 MW
resolved_value: 714 MW
research_value: 714 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35346.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/documents/d/guest/ea1_2024_accounts
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: East Anglia One Limited 2024 accounts
source_of_record_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/documents/d/guest/ea1_2024_accounts
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Openly accessible sources clearly confirm installed/generating capacity of 714 MW and the OFTO assets serving the 714 MW project. A separate project-specific MEC figure was not cleanly stated on accessible official pages reviewed, so 714 MW is used as the best-supported export-capacity equivalent for the operational asset, with the usual caveat that gross installed capacity and export-limited MEC can differ.


wind_farm_id: 6716
canonical_id: b6220494-3540-4a7d-9174-e57d077e2595
wind_farm_name: East Anglia ONE
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: SWT-7.0-154
resolved_value: SWT-7.0-154
research_value: SWT-7.0-154
resolved_fact_id: 35347.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/press-releases/east-anglia-1-service-contract-extension.html

research_summary:
Siemens Gamesa states East Anglia ONE has 102 SWT-7.0-154 turbines. ScottishPower confirms 102 Siemens Gamesa 7 MW turbines.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/press-releases/east-anglia-1-service-contract-extension.html


wind_farm_id: 6716
canonical_id: b6220494-3540-4a7d-9174-e57d077e2595
wind_farm_name: East Anglia ONE
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens Gamesa
resolved_value: Siemens Gamesa
research_value: Siemens Gamesa
resolved_fact_id: 9142.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: ScottishPower Renewables project page
research_source_type: official project page
research_source_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/east-anglia/east-anglia-one
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web pages from ScottishPower and Siemens Gamesa both explicitly tie Siemens Gamesa to East Anglia ONE.


wind_farm_id: 6716
canonical_id: b6220494-3540-4a7d-9174-e57d077e2595
wind_farm_name: East Anglia ONE
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 7
resolved_value: 7
research_value: 7 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9452.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: ScottishPower Renewables project page
research_source_type: official project page
research_source_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/east-anglia/east-anglia-one
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
ScottishPower states each of the 102 turbines produces 7 MW; Siemens Gamesa’s project-specific release identifies the SWT-7.0-154 model.


wind_farm_id: 6716
canonical_id: b6220494-3540-4a7d-9174-e57d077e2595
wind_farm_name: East Anglia ONE
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 154
resolved_value: 154
research_value: 154 m
resolved_fact_id: 9607.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Confirmed by the project-specific Siemens Gamesa model reference SWT-7.0-154. Because accessible project webpages did not separately spell out rotor diameter in text, the linked EuroWindWakes value was used as the required fallback to express the diameter numerically; it aligns with the project-specific model designation.


wind_farm_id: 6716
canonical_id: b6220494-3540-4a7d-9174-e57d077e2595
wind_farm_name: East Anglia ONE
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 90
resolved_value: 90
research_value: 90 m
resolved_fact_id: 9762.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources reviewed did not clearly state hub height for East Anglia ONE. Per instruction, the linked EuroWindWakes project turbine metadata was used as the required fallback: 90 m. This was not inferred from a generic turbine brochure.


wind_farm_id: 6716
canonical_id: b6220494-3540-4a7d-9174-e57d077e2595
wind_farm_name: East Anglia ONE
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 102
resolved_value: 102
research_value: 102
resolved_fact_id: 47147.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 102 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: ScottishPower Renewables project page
research_source_type: official project page
research_source_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/east-anglia/east-anglia-one
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
ScottishPower and Siemens Gamesa both state 102 turbines. This aligns with the non-web validation signals: database winner candidate 102, EuroWindWakes linked-turbine count 102, and EMODnet hint 102.


wind_farm_id: 6716
canonical_id: b6220494-3540-4a7d-9174-e57d077e2595
wind_farm_name: East Anglia ONE
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Jacket foundations
resolved_value: Jacket foundations
research_value: Jacket foundations
resolved_fact_id: 35353.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower contract award page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.scottishpower.com/w/scottishpower_renewables_agrees_contract_with_van_oord_to_install_steel_jackets_on_east_anglia_one

research_summary:
ScottishPower explicitly refers to “foundation jackets” and “three-legged steel jacket structures”; the current project page also lists “jacket type foundations.”

source_of_record_url:
https://www.scottishpower.com/w/scottishpower_renewables_agrees_contract_with_van_oord_to_install_steel_jackets_on_east_anglia_one


wind_farm_id: 6716
canonical_id: b6220494-3540-4a7d-9174-e57d077e2595
wind_farm_name: East Anglia ONE
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 17/06/2014
resolved_value: 17/06/2014
research_value: 17/06/2014
resolved_fact_id: 35354.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/east-anglia-one-offshore-windfarm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK DCO page
source_of_record_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/east-anglia-one-offshore-windfarm
source_of_record_licence: public sector webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
GOV.UK’s DCO page gives the exact date the order was made: 17 June 2014. ScottishPower’s timeline corroborates June 2014 as development consent granted.


wind_farm_id: 6716
canonical_id: b6220494-3540-4a7d-9174-e57d077e2595
wind_farm_name: East Anglia ONE
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 24/02/2016
resolved_value: 24/02/2016
research_value: 24/02/2016
resolved_fact_id: 35355.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
research_summary: ScottishPower’s dated announcement states it made the final investment decision on 24/02/2016.
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower FID announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.scottishpower.com/w/scottishpower_renewables_gives_green_light_for_25_billion_east_anglia_one

source_of_record_url:
https://www.scottishpower.com/w/scottishpower_renewables_gives_green_light_for_25_billion_east_anglia_one


wind_farm_id: 6716
canonical_id: b6220494-3540-4a7d-9174-e57d077e2595
wind_farm_name: East Anglia ONE
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 12/09/2019
resolved_value: 12/09/2019
research_value: 12/09/2019
resolved_fact_id: 35356.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Iberdrola press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.iberdrola.com/press-room/news/detail/east-anglia-offshore-wind-farm-started-producing-clean-electricity

research_summary:
Iberdrola’s press release dated 12.09.2019 states that East Anglia One had started producing clean electricity and that the first of its 102 wind turbines had already supplied electricity to land. ScottishPower’s East Anglia timeline also corroborates first power achieved in Sep 2019.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.iberdrola.com/press-room/news/detail/east-anglia-offshore-wind-farm-started-producing-clean-electricity


wind_farm_id: 6716
canonical_id: b6220494-3540-4a7d-9174-e57d077e2595
wind_farm_name: East Anglia ONE
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2020-07-01
resolved_value: 2020-07-01
research_value: 01/07/2020
resolved_fact_id: 9917.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Siemens Gamesa press release
research_source_type: OEM press release
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Siemens Gamesa states the wind power plant “was completed in July 2020,” and ScottishPower states it completed installation and commissioning of East Anglia ONE. As only month/year is explicit in the strongest source, the normalized table date is 01/07/2020.

research_source_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/press-releases/east-anglia-1-service-contract-extension.html


wind_farm_id: 6717
canonical_id: 6e868b06-0af7-446c-8a5a-f08d74c1bd76
wind_farm_name: Triton Knoll
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm
research_value: Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm
citation_url: https://www.tritonknoll.co.uk/about-triton-knoll/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Triton Knoll project website
source_of_record_url: https://www.tritonknoll.co.uk/about-triton-knoll/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official project name is Triton Knoll / Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm. Historic context matters: the project was originally consented as a larger offshore array and later reduced in build-out scope before construction.


wind_farm_id: 6717
canonical_id: 6e868b06-0af7-446c-8a5a-f08d74c1bd76
wind_farm_name: Triton Knoll
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35358.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: RWE (originally RWE npower renewables / innogy). Current owners: RWE 59%, J-Power 25%, Kansai Electric Power 16%. Operator: RWE.

resolved_value:
Developer: RWE (originally RWE npower renewables / innogy). Current owners: RWE 59%, J-Power 25%, Kansai Electric Power 16%. Operator: RWE.

citation_url:
https://uk.rwe.com/press-and-news/2023-12-05-triton-knoll-offshore-wind-farm-sale-of-transmission-assets/

research_summary:
Freshest ownership evidence relied on is the dated RWE transmission-assets sale release of 05/12/2023, which confirms the generating asset ownership split remained RWE 59%, J-Power 25%, Kansai 16%; the current project website matches this and says RWE operates and maintains the wind farm.

source_of_record_url:
https://uk.rwe.com/press-and-news/2023-12-05-triton-knoll-offshore-wind-farm-sale-of-transmission-assets/


wind_farm_id: 6717
canonical_id: 6e868b06-0af7-446c-8a5a-f08d74c1bd76
wind_farm_name: Triton Knoll
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: innogy / RWE UK press release PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Initially developed by RWE; Statkraft became a development partner in 2015 and exited in 2017; innogy/RWE brought in J-Power and Kansai in 2018; current ownership is RWE 59%, J-Power 25%, Kansai 16%.

research_value:
Initially developed by RWE; Statkraft became a development partner in 2015 and exited in 2017; innogy/RWE brought in J-Power and Kansai in 2018; current ownership is RWE 59%, J-Power 25%, Kansai 16%.

citation_url:
https://uk.rwe.com/-/media/RWE/RWE-UK/downloads/rwe-renewables-uk-press-releases/2018/08-2018-innogy-finds-new-partners-for-its-triton-knoll-offshore-wind-farm.pdf

research_summary:
Ownership history is well evidenced: Statkraft exit was announced in October 2017; innogy announced sale of 41% to J-Power and Kansai in August 2018; RWE’s 05/12/2023 release confirms the same current split. Freshest source date relied on for current structure: 05/12/2023.

source_of_record_url:
https://uk.rwe.com/-/media/RWE/RWE-UK/downloads/rwe-renewables-uk-press-releases/2018/08-2018-innogy-finds-new-partners-for-its-triton-knoll-offshore-wind-farm.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6717
canonical_id: 6e868b06-0af7-446c-8a5a-f08d74c1bd76
wind_farm_name: Triton Knoll
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 35359.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.rwe.com/en/rwe-interim-statement-Q1-2022/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE Q1 2022 interim statement
source_of_record_url: https://www.rwe.com/en/rwe-interim-statement-Q1-2022/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project website says turbine commissioning was completed in January 2022 and the project is fully operational; RWE’s Q1 2022 interim statement says the wind farm has officially been online since April 2022. Boundary Layer status therefore is Operational.


wind_farm_id: 6717
canonical_id: 6e868b06-0af7-446c-8a5a-f08d74c1bd76
wind_farm_name: Triton Knoll
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 857 MW
resolved_value: 857 MW
research_value: 857 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35360.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.tritonknoll.co.uk/about-triton-knoll/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Triton Knoll project website
source_of_record_url: https://www.tritonknoll.co.uk/about-triton-knoll/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Multiple project-specific sources agree the installed capacity is 857 MW. This aligns with the validation context.


wind_farm_id: 6717
canonical_id: 6e868b06-0af7-446c-8a5a-f08d74c1bd76
wind_farm_name: Triton Knoll
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 900 MW
resolved_value: 900 MW
research_value: 900 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35361.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Planning Inspectorate consultation report PDF
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/TritonKnollConnectionConsultationReport.pdf

research_summary:
Project sources consistently distinguish the built installed capacity of 857 MW from a 900 MW electrical/export system envelope. Siemens referred to circa 860 MW installed generation, while Planning Inspectorate consultation material states the electrical system capacity was reduced from 1,200 MW to 900 MW. Reported here as MEC / electrical system export capacity.

source_of_record_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/TritonKnollConnectionConsultationReport.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6717
canonical_id: 6e868b06-0af7-446c-8a5a-f08d74c1bd76
wind_farm_name: Triton Knoll
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: V164-9.5 MW
resolved_value: V164-9.5 MW
research_value: V164-9.5 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35362.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Triton Knoll financial close announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.tritonknoll.co.uk/triton-knoll-confirms-financial-close-with-major-turbine-deal-and-east-coast-ports-plans/

research_summary:
Project-specific web sources confirm 90 V164-9.5 MW turbines; the project site uses “MHI Vestas v164-9.5 MW”, while later RWE and turbine-supply references use Vestas branding after corporate integration.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.tritonknoll.co.uk/triton-knoll-confirms-financial-close-with-major-turbine-deal-and-east-coast-ports-plans/


wind_farm_id: 6717
canonical_id: 6e868b06-0af7-446c-8a5a-f08d74c1bd76
wind_farm_name: Triton Knoll
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas
resolved_value: Vestas
research_value: Vestas
resolved_fact_id: 9143.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Triton Knoll offshore wind turbines page
research_source_type: official project website
research_source_url: https://www.tritonknoll.co.uk/offshore-wind-turbines/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project evidence is brand-transition sensitive: earlier project documents state MHI Vestas; current project construction page states the V164-9.5 MW turbines are manufactured by Vestas. Reported OEM as Vestas, consistent with the linked turbine metadata fallback and current branding.


wind_farm_id: 6717
canonical_id: 6e868b06-0af7-446c-8a5a-f08d74c1bd76
wind_farm_name: Triton Knoll
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 164
resolved_value: 164
research_value: 164 m
resolved_fact_id: 9608.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources clearly tie the project to the V164-9.5 MW platform, which implies a 164 m rotor, but accessible project pages did not clearly state rotor diameter as a label-value on-page. Per instruction, the linked EuroWindWakes dataset value was used as required fallback; it is also consistent with the project’s V164 designation.


wind_farm_id: 6717
canonical_id: 6e868b06-0af7-446c-8a5a-f08d74c1bd76
wind_farm_name: Triton Knoll
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 105
resolved_value: 105
research_value: 105 m
resolved_fact_id: 9763.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific accessible web sources reviewed did not provide a clearly project-tied hub-height value. Per instruction, the linked EuroWindWakes dataset value was used as the required fallback.


wind_farm_id: 6717
canonical_id: 6e868b06-0af7-446c-8a5a-f08d74c1bd76
wind_farm_name: Triton Knoll
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 90
resolved_value: 90
research_value: 90
resolved_fact_id: 47148.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 90 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Triton Knoll project website
research_source_type: official project website
research_source_url: https://www.tritonknoll.co.uk/about-triton-knoll/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Official project pages and supplier sources consistently state 90 turbines. This aligns with the non-web validation signals: database candidate 90, EuroWindWakes linked-turbine count 90, and EMODnet hint 90.


wind_farm_id: 6717
canonical_id: 6e868b06-0af7-446c-8a5a-f08d74c1bd76
wind_farm_name: Triton Knoll
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile foundations with transition pieces
resolved_value: Monopile foundations with transition pieces
research_value: Monopile foundations with transition pieces
resolved_fact_id: 35368.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.tritonknoll.co.uk/offshore-foundations/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Triton Knoll foundations page
source_of_record_url: https://www.tritonknoll.co.uk/offshore-foundations/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific construction pages state each of the 90 foundations consists of a steel monopile and transition piece; Sif’s project page independently confirms monopiles.


wind_farm_id: 6717
canonical_id: 6e868b06-0af7-446c-8a5a-f08d74c1bd76
wind_farm_name: Triton Knoll
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 11/07/2013
resolved_value: 11/07/2013
research_value: 11/07/2013
resolved_fact_id: 35369.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.tritonknoll.co.uk/about-triton-knoll/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Triton Knoll project website
source_of_record_url: https://www.tritonknoll.co.uk/about-triton-knoll/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The offshore array consent was granted on 11/07/2013. The electrical system later received separate DCO consent on 03/09/2016, but for the wind farm project consent milestone the array consent date is the key generation-asset consent.


wind_farm_id: 6717
canonical_id: 6e868b06-0af7-446c-8a5a-f08d74c1bd76
wind_farm_name: Triton Knoll
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 31/08/2018
resolved_value: 31/08/2018
research_value: 31/08/2018
resolved_fact_id: 35370.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Triton Knoll financial close announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.tritonknoll.co.uk/triton-knoll-confirms-financial-close-with-major-turbine-deal-and-east-coast-ports-plans/

research_summary:
Triton Knoll’s own financial close announcement is dated 31/08/2018 and states financial close was confirmed that day. This is the cleaner source-of-record page for the FID milestone than the previously used supplier page.


wind_farm_id: 6717
canonical_id: 6e868b06-0af7-446c-8a5a-f08d74c1bd76
wind_farm_name: Triton Knoll
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/03/2021
resolved_value: 01/03/2021
research_value: 01/03/2021
resolved_fact_id: 35371.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.rwe.com/en/press/rwe-renewables/2021-03-01-triton-knoll-offshore-wind-farm-generates-first-power/

research_summary:
RWE announced first power on 01/03/2021; the project site mirrors that milestone. A later RWE PDF says power was delivered in February 2021, but the dated public announcement is 01/03/2021, which is the clearest source-backed milestone date.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.rwe.com/en/press/rwe-renewables/2021-03-01-triton-knoll-offshore-wind-farm-generates-first-power/


wind_farm_id: 6717
canonical_id: 6e868b06-0af7-446c-8a5a-f08d74c1bd76
wind_farm_name: Triton Knoll
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2022-04-01
resolved_value: 2022-04-01
research_value: 01/04/2022
resolved_fact_id: 9918.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: RWE Q1 2022 interim statement
research_source_type: owner / operator report
research_source_url: https://www.rwe.com/en/rwe-interim-statement-Q1-2022/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
There is a mild wording difference between “turbine commissioning completed” in January 2022 and the start of commercial operations / official online date in April 2022. For full commissioning of the operational project, April 2022 is the stronger end-state date because RWE states the wind farm has officially been online since April 2022, and J-Power lists commencement of commercial operations as 2022/4.


wind_farm_id: 6719
canonical_id: 62491c13-56eb-4f04-8e71-dd7d51cdca8f
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 2 (Soundmark)
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ofgem Hornsea Project Two transmission asset review
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Hornsea Project Two (Hornsea 2); Soundmark Wind Limited is one of the project companies associated with Hornsea Project Two

research_value:
Hornsea Project Two (Hornsea 2); Soundmark Wind Limited is one of the project companies associated with Hornsea Project Two

citation_url:
https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2023-07/Hornsea_Two_Offshore_Wind_Farm_Transmission_Assets_Ex_Post_Review_dated_23_December_2022%20-%20Non%20confidential%20report.pdf

research_summary:
The web evidence consistently identifies the operational asset as Hornsea Project Two / Hornsea 2. The “Soundmark” wording appears in project-company and regulatory documentation alongside Breesea and Sonningmay/Sonningmay-type entities, not as a separately branded operating wind farm. The ambiguity is therefore best resolved as: database row “Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 2 (Soundmark)” maps to the operational Hornsea Project Two asset.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2023-07/Hornsea_Two_Offshore_Wind_Farm_Transmission_Assets_Ex_Post_Review_dated_23_December_2022%20-%20Non%20confidential%20report.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6719
canonical_id: 62491c13-56eb-4f04-8e71-dd7d51cdca8f
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 2 (Soundmark)
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35373.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://cdn.orsted.com/-/media/annual2024/orsted-annual-report-2024.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted Annual Report 2024
source_of_record_url: https://cdn.orsted.com/-/media/annual2024/orsted-annual-report-2024.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Ørsted. Current owners: Ørsted 37.55%, AXA IM Alts / clients 25%, Crédit Agricole Assurances 25%, Brookfield 12.45%. Operator: Ørsted

resolved_value:
Developer: Ørsted. Current owners: Ørsted 37.55%, AXA IM Alts / clients 25%, Crédit Agricole Assurances 25%, Brookfield 12.45%. Operator: Ørsted

research_summary:
Freshest ownership evidence relied on: Ørsted Annual Report 2024, published 2025, which states that in December 2024 Ørsted divested a 24.9% equity stake of its 50% share, equal to 12.45% of Hornsea 2, to Brookfield. Earlier official Ørsted transaction news from 28/03/2022 confirms the baseline 50/25/25 structure with AXA IM Alts and Crédit Agricole Assurances. Ørsted’s project page identifies Ørsted as operator and shows a 50% ownership-share page context, but the newer 2024/2025 material is needed to update the current split.


wind_farm_id: 6719
canonical_id: 62491c13-56eb-4f04-8e71-dd7d51cdca8f
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 2 (Soundmark)
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2022/03/20220328503311
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted Hornsea 2 partnership announcement
source_of_record_url: https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2022/03/20220328503311
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Originally developed by SMart Wind / DONG Energy lineage; later Ørsted. 28/03/2022: Ørsted agreed sale of 50% to AXA IM Alts / clients and Crédit Agricole Assurances (25% each). 12/2024: Brookfield acquired 12.45%, reducing Ørsted to 37.55%

research_value:
Originally developed by SMart Wind / DONG Energy lineage; later Ørsted. 28/03/2022: Ørsted agreed sale of 50% to AXA IM Alts / clients and Crédit Agricole Assurances (25% each). 12/2024: Brookfield acquired 12.45%, reducing Ørsted to 37.55%

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on for the present structure is 2025 publication of Ørsted Annual Report 2024 confirming the December 2024 Brookfield divestment. For earlier history, Ørsted’s 28/03/2022 official announcement confirms the 50% farm-down to the AXA IM Alts / Crédit Agricole consortium. Planning/regulatory records show the older project identity under Hornsea Zone / SMart Wind structures before Ørsted ownership.


wind_farm_id: 6719
canonical_id: 62491c13-56eb-4f04-8e71-dd7d51cdca8f
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 2 (Soundmark)
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 35374.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://orsted.co.uk/energy-solutions/offshore-wind/our-wind-farms/hornsea2
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted Hornsea 2 project page
source_of_record_url: https://orsted.co.uk/energy-solutions/offshore-wind/our-wind-farms/hornsea2
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Ørsted states Hornsea 2 “became fully operational in August 2022”; Ofgem’s 2022/2023 transmission review also states the wind farm is fully operational and full export capacity was achieved in August 2022. This cleanly fits the Boundary Layer status Operational.


wind_farm_id: 6719
canonical_id: 62491c13-56eb-4f04-8e71-dd7d51cdca8f
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 2 (Soundmark)
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1,386 MW
resolved_value: 1,386 MW
research_value: 1,386 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35375.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ofgem Hornsea Project Two transmission asset review
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2023-07/Hornsea_Two_Offshore_Wind_Farm_Transmission_Assets_Ex_Post_Review_dated_23_December_2022%20-%20Non%20confidential%20report.pdf

research_summary:
Ofgem’s project-specific transmission review states 1,386 MW and 165 Siemens Gamesa WTGs each with a capacity of 8.4 MW, which reconciles arithmetically. Ørsted’s public project page commonly rounds the project to 1.3 GW / power-for-homes language; for exact installed capacity, the Ofgem project-specific figure is stronger.


wind_farm_id: 6719
canonical_id: 62491c13-56eb-4f04-8e71-dd7d51cdca8f
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 2 (Soundmark)
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ofgem Hornsea Project Two transmission asset review
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Public web sources reviewed confirm that full export capacity was achieved in August 2022, but an explicit project MEC figure was not found in an openly accessible authoritative project page during this search. To avoid conflating installed capacity with transmission/export rating, MEC is left as Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6719
canonical_id: 62491c13-56eb-4f04-8e71-dd7d51cdca8f
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 2 (Soundmark)
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: SG 8.0-167 DD
resolved_value: SG 8.0-167 DD
research_value: SG 8.0-167 DD
resolved_fact_id: 35376.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web evidence is conflicting/incomplete because authoritative project pages often state 8.4 MW turbines without clearly naming the exact model variant. As required, the linked EuroWindWakes project turbine metadata is used as the fallback for turbine-specific specification and gives SG 8.0-167 DD. Siemens Gamesa’s project press release supports Hornsea Two as a 165-turbine Siemens Gamesa supply.


wind_farm_id: 6719
canonical_id: 62491c13-56eb-4f04-8e71-dd7d51cdca8f
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 2 (Soundmark)
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens Gamesa
resolved_value: Siemens Gamesa
research_value: Siemens Gamesa
resolved_fact_id: 9145.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Siemens Gamesa’s official project announcement confirms it will supply the turbines for Hornsea Two. The linked EuroWindWakes project metadata also identifies Siemens Gamesa as OEM.


wind_farm_id: 6719
canonical_id: 62491c13-56eb-4f04-8e71-dd7d51cdca8f
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 2 (Soundmark)
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 8
resolved_value: 8
research_value: 8 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9455.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific sources conflict between 8 MW platform naming and 8.4 MW installed capacity arithmetic. Because the project-specific web evidence is ambiguous on whether the site should be recorded by nominal model rating or uprated site configuration, the linked EuroWindWakes fallback is used for this turbine-specific field: 8 MW. The Ofgem transmission review shows the site-level arithmetic equivalent of 165 × 8.4 MW = 1,386 MW, so this nuance is important.


wind_farm_id: 6719
canonical_id: 62491c13-56eb-4f04-8e71-dd7d51cdca8f
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 2 (Soundmark)
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 167
resolved_value: 167
research_value: 167 m
resolved_fact_id: 9610.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific owner/regulator pages reviewed did not clearly state rotor diameter for Hornsea Two. Per the required fallback rule, the linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata value 167 m is used. This also aligns with the model naming convention in Siemens Gamesa’s project announcement.


wind_farm_id: 6719
canonical_id: 62491c13-56eb-4f04-8e71-dd7d51cdca8f
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 2 (Soundmark)
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 120
resolved_value: 120
research_value: 120 m
resolved_fact_id: 9765.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources reviewed did not provide a clear, project-tied hub height. Per the required fallback rule, the linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata value 120 m is used and not inferred from a generic turbine page.


wind_farm_id: 6719
canonical_id: 62491c13-56eb-4f04-8e71-dd7d51cdca8f
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 2 (Soundmark)
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 55
resolved_value: 55
research_value: 165
resolved_fact_id: 47150.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 55 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Ofgem Hornsea Project Two transmission asset review
research_source_type: regulator pdf
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Multiple project-specific sources confirm 165 turbines. This aligns with the database metadata and EMODnet hint (165) but differs from the linked-location validation signal (55), which is most likely a partial linked-turbine coverage issue rather than the built project count.


wind_farm_id: 6719
canonical_id: 62491c13-56eb-4f04-8e71-dd7d51cdca8f
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 2 (Soundmark)
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile foundations for wind turbines
resolved_value: Monopile foundations for wind turbines
research_value: Monopile foundations for wind turbines
resolved_fact_id: 35382.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEME final foundation announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.deme-group.com/news/deme-offshore-installs-final-foundation-hornsea-two-offshore-wind-farm

research_summary:
DEME’s official project update states it installed the final and 165th monopile foundation at Hornsea Two. This is corroborated by multiple project construction reports. Note that offshore substations/reactive compensation assets sit on jacket foundations, but the wind turbine foundations are monopiles.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.deme-group.com/news/deme-offshore-installs-final-foundation-hornsea-two-offshore-wind-farm


wind_farm_id: 6719
canonical_id: 62491c13-56eb-4f04-8e71-dd7d51cdca8f
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 2 (Soundmark)
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 16/08/2016
resolved_value: 16/08/2016
research_value: 16/08/2016
resolved_fact_id: 35383.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://vlex.co.uk/vid/the-hornsea-two-offshore-811554729
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: The Hornsea Two Offshore Wind Farm Order 2016
source_of_record_url: https://vlex.co.uk/vid/the-hornsea-two-offshore-811554729
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The Hornsea Two Offshore Wind Farm Order 2016 was made on 16/08/2016. Later GOV.UK material about variations/non-material change confirms the project received its DCO in 2016.


wind_farm_id: 6719
canonical_id: 62491c13-56eb-4f04-8e71-dd7d51cdca8f
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 2 (Soundmark)
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/09/2017
resolved_value: 01/09/2017
research_value: 01/09/2017
resolved_fact_id: 35384.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.power-technology.com/projects/hornsea-project-two-north-sea/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Power Technology Hornsea Project Two profile
source_of_record_url: https://www.power-technology.com/projects/hornsea-project-two-north-sea/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Publicly accessible secondary project references consistently state FID in September 2017. I did not find a cleaner openly accessible official FID press release during this search, so the date is normalized to 01/09/2017 at month level.


wind_farm_id: 6719
canonical_id: 62491c13-56eb-4f04-8e71-dd7d51cdca8f
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 2 (Soundmark)
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/12/2021
resolved_value: 01/12/2021
research_value: 01/12/2021
resolved_fact_id: 35385.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2021/12/20211220460511
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted first power announcement
source_of_record_url: https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2021/12/20211220460511
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Ørsted’s official announcement states Hornsea 2 generated first power in December 2021; the exact day was not stated in the source snippet reviewed, so this is normalized to 01/12/2021. Secondary coverage corroborates the month/year.


wind_farm_id: 6719
canonical_id: 62491c13-56eb-4f04-8e71-dd7d51cdca8f
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 2 (Soundmark)
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2022-08-01
resolved_value: 2022-08-01
research_value: 01/08/2022
resolved_fact_id: 9920.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Ørsted Hornsea 2 project page
research_source_type: owner project page
research_source_url: https://orsted.co.uk/energy-solutions/offshore-wind/our-wind-farms/hornsea2
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Ørsted states Hornsea 2 became fully operational in August 2022; Ofgem’s transmission review says full export capacity was achieved in August 2022. As only month/year is clearly evidenced in the accessible sources, the date is normalized to 01/08/2022.


wind_farm_id: 6720
canonical_id: f52c6d68-a45f-42c6-a60c-4e61579e51b9
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 3 (Sonningmay)
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2023-07/2300714%20Hornsea%20CAR%20Final%20.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ofgem cost assessment for the Hornsea Project Two transmission assets
source_of_record_url: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2023-07/2300714%20Hornsea%20CAR%20Final%20.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public sector / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Hornsea 2 Offshore Wind Farm (also referred to as Hornsea Project Two / Hornsea Two Offshore Wind Farm); “Sonningmay” is an SPV owner name, not a separate built phase

research_value:
Hornsea 2 Offshore Wind Farm (also referred to as Hornsea Project Two / Hornsea Two Offshore Wind Farm); “Sonningmay” is an SPV owner name, not a separate built phase

research_summary:
Web sources consistently identify the built asset as Hornsea 2 / Hornsea Project Two. Ofgem’s transmission-asset documentation ties the same built wind farm to the owner SPVs Breesea, Soundmark Wind and Sonningmay Wind, which explains the database label ambiguity.


wind_farm_id: 6720
canonical_id: f52c6d68-a45f-42c6-a60c-4e61579e51b9
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 3 (Sonningmay)
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35501.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2022/03/20220328503311
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted partnership announcement
source_of_record_url: https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2022/03/20220328503311
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Ørsted. Current owners: Ørsted 50%, AXA IM Alts 25%, Crédit Agricole Assurances 25%. Operator: Ørsted

resolved_value:
Developer: Ørsted. Current owners: Ørsted 50%, AXA IM Alts 25%, Crédit Agricole Assurances 25%. Operator: Ørsted

research_summary:
Ørsted’s dated 28/03/2022 announcement states it agreed to divest 50% to a consortium and that AXA IM Alts and Crédit Agricole Assurances would each own 25% after closing; the deal was to close once fully commissioned. Ofgem’s 2023 asset-transfer material still shows the project-holding SPVs. Freshest ownership-split source relied on: Ørsted page dated 28/03/2022; freshest operator confirmation relied on: Ørsted UK operations update dated 26/06/2025 says Ørsted “takes full control of Hornsea 2 operations”.


wind_farm_id: 6720
canonical_id: f52c6d68-a45f-42c6-a60c-4e61579e51b9
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 3 (Sonningmay)
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2022/03/20220328503311
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted partnership announcement
source_of_record_url: https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2022/03/20220328503311
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Originally developed/owned by Ørsted (then DONG Energy); 50% farm-down agreed 28/03/2022 and closed after commissioning in H2 2022, leaving Ørsted 50%, AXA IM Alts 25%, Crédit Agricole Assurances 25%

research_value:
Originally developed/owned by Ørsted (then DONG Energy); 50% farm-down agreed 28/03/2022 and closed after commissioning in H2 2022, leaving Ørsted 50%, AXA IM Alts 25%, Crédit Agricole Assurances 25%

research_summary:
Ørsted’s older project timeline material shows the project moving through CfD/FID under Ørsted control; the 28/03/2022 Ørsted release records the 50% divestment structure. Freshest source date relied on for post-construction operating control nuance: 26/06/2025.


wind_farm_id: 6720
canonical_id: f52c6d68-a45f-42c6-a60c-4e61579e51b9
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 3 (Sonningmay)
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 35502.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2022/08/20220831559011
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted full operation announcement
source_of_record_url: https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2022/08/20220831559011
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Ørsted announced full operation on 31/08/2022. Later Ørsted UK operational-control reporting in 2025 also treats Hornsea 2 as an operating asset.


wind_farm_id: 6720
canonical_id: f52c6d68-a45f-42c6-a60c-4e61579e51b9
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 3 (Sonningmay)
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1,386 MW
resolved_value: 1,386 MW
research_value: 1,386 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35503.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa Hornsea Two order release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/press-releases/siemens-gamesa-news-offshore-hornsea-two-oersted.html

research_summary:
Siemens Gamesa’s project-specific order release gives a combined rating of 1,386 MW; Ofgem’s project-specific transmission assessment says the wind farm has capacity of over 1.3 GW and comprises 165 turbines.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/press-releases/siemens-gamesa-news-offshore-hornsea-two-oersted.html


wind_farm_id: 6720
canonical_id: f52c6d68-a45f-42c6-a60c-4e61579e51b9
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 3 (Sonningmay)
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1,800 MW consented maximum under DCO; as-built installed capacity 1,386 MW
resolved_value: 1,800 MW consented maximum under DCO; as-built installed capacity 1,386 MW
research_value: 1,800 MW consented maximum under DCO; as-built installed capacity 1,386 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35504.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hornsea-two-offshore-wind-farm-variation-2
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK Hornsea Two Variation 2 page
source_of_record_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hornsea-two-offshore-wind-farm-variation-2
source_of_record_licence: Open Government / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No clear open source was found stating a separate as-built MEC value in MW. The accessible regulatory source confirms the DCO authorises up to 1,800 MW, while project-specific operational sources confirm the built plant is 1,386 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6720
canonical_id: f52c6d68-a45f-42c6-a60c-4e61579e51b9
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 3 (Sonningmay)
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: SG 8.0-167 DD
resolved_value: SG 8.0-167 DD
research_value: SG 8.0-167 DD
resolved_fact_id: 35505.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa Hornsea Two order release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/press-releases/siemens-gamesa-news-offshore-hornsea-two-oersted.html

research_summary:
Siemens Gamesa’s project-specific order release explicitly names 165 SG 8.0-167 DD turbines for Hornsea Two. This matches the linked EuroWindWakes fallback value, so no generic turbine-page inference was needed.


wind_farm_id: 6720
canonical_id: f52c6d68-a45f-42c6-a60c-4e61579e51b9
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 3 (Sonningmay)
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 8
resolved_value: 8
research_value: 8 MW nominal turbine platform; project fleet uprated to 8.4 MW equivalent average (1,386 MW / 165)
resolved_fact_id: 9456.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Siemens Gamesa Hornsea Two order release
research_source_type: OEM press release
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific sources are internally inconsistent in wording: Siemens Gamesa names the ordered model SG 8.0-167 DD, while Ofgem’s 2023 project assessment describes the built fleet as 165 Siemens Gamesa 8.4 MW turbines. To avoid model-page inference, the value is presented as the nominal platform rating plus the project-average uprated equivalent evidenced by project sources.


wind_farm_id: 6720
canonical_id: f52c6d68-a45f-42c6-a60c-4e61579e51b9
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 3 (Sonningmay)
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 167
resolved_value: 167
research_value: 167 m
resolved_fact_id: 9611.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Siemens Gamesa Hornsea Two order release
research_source_type: OEM press release
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Siemens Gamesa’s Hornsea Two order release explicitly says the SG 8.0-167 DD used for this project has a rotor 167 metres in diameter; this aligns with the linked EuroWindWakes fallback value.


wind_farm_id: 6720
canonical_id: f52c6d68-a45f-42c6-a60c-4e61579e51b9
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 3 (Sonningmay)
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 120
resolved_value: 120
research_value: 120 m
resolved_fact_id: 9766.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific accessible web sources reviewed did not clearly confirm hub height for Hornsea 2. Per the required fallback rule, the linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata value of 120 m is used explicitly as dataset fallback.


wind_farm_id: 6720
canonical_id: f52c6d68-a45f-42c6-a60c-4e61579e51b9
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 3 (Sonningmay)
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 55
resolved_value: 55
research_value: 165
resolved_fact_id: 47151.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 55 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Ørsted full operation announcement
research_source_type: developer / operator press release
research_source_url: https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2022/08/20220831559011
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Ørsted and Siemens Gamesa both state 165 turbines. This aligns with the EMODnet hint of 165, but differs from the linked 55-turbine validation signal, which is most likely only a partial linked-location subset rather than full farm scope.


wind_farm_id: 6720
canonical_id: f52c6d68-a45f-42c6-a60c-4e61579e51b9
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 3 (Sonningmay)
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile turbine foundations
resolved_value: Monopile turbine foundations
research_value: Monopile turbine foundations
resolved_fact_id: 35511.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Renewable Energy Magazine / DEME coverage
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.renewableenergymagazine.com/wind/deme-offshore-installs-final-foundation-at-hornsea-20211027

research_summary:
Project-specific construction coverage states DEME installed 165 monopile foundations at Hornsea Two; Ørsted’s 2018 newsletter also discusses turbine foundation design. The OSS/RCS use jacket foundations, but the turbine foundations are monopiles.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.renewableenergymagazine.com/wind/deme-offshore-installs-final-foundation-at-hornsea-20211027


wind_farm_id: 6720
canonical_id: f52c6d68-a45f-42c6-a60c-4e61579e51b9
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 3 (Sonningmay)
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 17/08/2016
resolved_value: 17/08/2016
research_value: 17/08/2016
resolved_fact_id: 35512.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hornsea-two-offshore-wind-farm-variation-2
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK Hornsea Two Variation 2 page
source_of_record_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hornsea-two-offshore-wind-farm-variation-2
source_of_record_licence: Open Government / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
GOV.UK states the Secretary of State granted the DCO in August 2016; project timeline material from Ørsted also shows August 2016 as the DCO milestone. Normalized to exact day from the government decision publication.


wind_farm_id: 6720
canonical_id: f52c6d68-a45f-42c6-a60c-4e61579e51b9
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 3 (Sonningmay)
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/09/2017
resolved_value: 01/09/2017
research_value: 01/09/2017
resolved_fact_id: 35513.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/wind-project-sites/hornsea-2-offshore-wind-farm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Tethys Hornsea 2 project page
source_of_record_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/wind-project-sites/hornsea-2-offshore-wind-farm
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Ørsted’s project timeline says “February Contract for Difference awarded ... and Final Investment Decision made”, but the year-marker layout is ambiguous in the scan. Independent secondary project summaries consistently place FID in September 2017, so month-level evidence is used and normalized to 01/09/2017.


wind_farm_id: 6720
canonical_id: f52c6d68-a45f-42c6-a60c-4e61579e51b9
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 3 (Sonningmay)
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 20/12/2021
resolved_value: 20/12/2021
research_value: 20/12/2021
resolved_fact_id: 35514.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2022/03/20220328503311
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted partnership announcement
source_of_record_url: https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2022/03/20220328503311
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Ørsted’s 28/03/2022 announcement explicitly states that Hornsea 2 generated first power on 20 December 2021; Ørsted’s December 2021 first-power release corroborates the milestone.


wind_farm_id: 6720
canonical_id: f52c6d68-a45f-42c6-a60c-4e61579e51b9
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 3 (Sonningmay)
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2022-08-01
resolved_value: 2022-08-01
research_value: 31/08/2022
resolved_fact_id: 9921.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Ørsted full operation announcement
research_source_type: developer / operator press release
research_source_url: https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2022/08/20220831559011
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Ørsted’s dated 31/08/2022 release states Hornsea 2 is “now fully operational”; Tethys also records August 2022 as fully operational.


wind_farm_id: 6721
canonical_id: 913f07bb-63d3-464a-b5c9-12b2582d5548
wind_farm_name: North Hoyle
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: North Hoyle Offshore Wind Farm
research_value: North Hoyle Offshore Wind Farm
citation_url: https://uk.rwe.com/our-energy/offshore-wind
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE offshore wind overview
source_of_record_url: https://uk.rwe.com/our-energy/offshore-wind
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official and sector sources consistently identify the asset as North Hoyle Offshore Wind Farm. RWE describes it as the UK’s first commercial-scale offshore wind farm, while Crown Estate reporting identifies North Hoyle off the north Wales coast as its first commercial offshore wind farm lease. Historic developer naming also used North Hoyle Wind Farm / North Hoyle offshore wind farm.


wind_farm_id: 6721
canonical_id: 913f07bb-63d3-464a-b5c9-12b2582d5548
wind_farm_name: North Hoyle
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35516.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.globaldata.com/store/report/north-hoyle-profile-snapshot/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GlobalData North Hoyle snapshot
source_of_record_url: https://www.globaldata.com/store/report/north-hoyle-profile-snapshot/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: National Wind Power / npower renewables (now RWE lineage); Current owner: Greencoat UK Wind plc; Operator: RWE

resolved_value:
Developer: National Wind Power / npower renewables (now RWE lineage); Current owner: Greencoat UK Wind plc; Operator: RWE

research_summary:
Developer history is clear: early project sources name National Wind Power and later npower renewables/RWE as developer-operator. Current ownership is less clearly presented on a live project page, but multiple open web sources indicate Greencoat UK Wind plc owns North Hoyle, while current RWE pages still show RWE operating North Hoyle within its UK offshore wind portfolio. Freshest owner evidence located in accessible web results is GlobalData snapshot published 09/11/2023 stating Greencoat owns the project.


wind_farm_id: 6721
canonical_id: 913f07bb-63d3-464a-b5c9-12b2582d5548
wind_farm_name: North Hoyle
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.nsenergybusiness.com/news/newsrwe-npower-completes-wind-farm-transfer/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: NS Energy transfer report
source_of_record_url: https://www.nsenergybusiness.com/news/newsrwe-npower-completes-wind-farm-transfer/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Originally developed and operated by National Wind Power / npower renewables; transferred into Zephyr fund in 2005/2006 with RWE retaining 33.3%; later sold on and now reported as owned by Greencoat UK Wind plc

research_value:
Originally developed and operated by National Wind Power / npower renewables; transferred into Zephyr fund in 2005/2006 with RWE retaining 33.3%; later sold on and now reported as owned by Greencoat UK Wind plc

research_summary:
Ownership history is better evidenced than current split. NS Energy reported in January 2006 that North Hoyle was transferred into the Zephyr fund and that RWE npower would retain a 1/3 stake. RWE investor materials later confirmed innogy sold its 33.3% interest in Zephyr in July 2016. More recent accessible web evidence indicates Greencoat UK Wind is the current owner, but I did not find an openly accessible official project/JV page giving a reconciled present-day percentage breakdown, so exact current percentages are Not confirmed. Freshest dated source relied on for historic transfer chain: RWE H1 2016 report; freshest source for current owner signal: GlobalData 09/11/2023.


wind_farm_id: 6721
canonical_id: 913f07bb-63d3-464a-b5c9-12b2582d5548
wind_farm_name: North Hoyle
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 35517.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: UK Government review of consents for major infrastructure projects
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public sector terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/681b52099ef97b58cce3e4fc/review-of-consents-for-major-infrastructure-projects-spas-sacs.pdf

research_summary:
Recent RWE pages still reference North Hoyle as an operating asset and staffing team, while the UK major-infrastructure consent review lists North Hoyle as Operational. This cleanly matches the required Boundary Layer status.


wind_farm_id: 6721
canonical_id: 913f07bb-63d3-464a-b5c9-12b2582d5548
wind_farm_name: North Hoyle
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 60 MW
resolved_value: 60 MW
research_value: 60 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35518.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/our-business/marine/offshore-wind-report-2022
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: The Crown Estate Offshore Wind Report 2022
source_of_record_url: https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/our-business/marine/offshore-wind-report-2022
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Capacity is consistently reported as 60 MW across Crown Estate, RWE-history references, and historic transaction coverage. This aligns with the database validation context.


wind_farm_id: 6721
canonical_id: 913f07bb-63d3-464a-b5c9-12b2582d5548
wind_farm_name: North Hoyle
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.reuk.co.uk/North-Hoyle-Offshore-Wind-Farm.htm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: REUK North Hoyle page
source_of_record_url: https://www.reuk.co.uk/North-Hoyle-Offshore-Wind-Farm.htm
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I found consistent evidence for installed capacity 60 MW, but no openly accessible source that explicitly states North Hoyle’s licensed/export MEC as a separate figure. To avoid conflating installed capacity with export capacity, this is left Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6721
canonical_id: 913f07bb-63d3-464a-b5c9-12b2582d5548
wind_farm_name: North Hoyle
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas V80-2.0 MW
resolved_value: Vestas V80-2.0 MW
research_value: Vestas V80-2.0 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35519.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources support Vestas V80 / 2 MW class machines. Because project-specific web evidence on the exact formatting of the turbine designation is limited, the linked EuroWindWakes project turbine row was used as the required fallback for the normalized full model string V80-2.0 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6721
canonical_id: 913f07bb-63d3-464a-b5c9-12b2582d5548
wind_farm_name: North Hoyle
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas
resolved_value: Vestas
research_value: Vestas
resolved_fact_id: 9147.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources identify the turbines as Vestas machines, and the linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata agrees.


wind_farm_id: 6721
canonical_id: 913f07bb-63d3-464a-b5c9-12b2582d5548
wind_farm_name: North Hoyle
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2
resolved_value: 2
research_value: 2 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9457.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Multiple project-specific sources state 30 turbines at 2 MW each. This also matches the linked EuroWindWakes row.


wind_farm_id: 6721
canonical_id: 913f07bb-63d3-464a-b5c9-12b2582d5548
wind_farm_name: North Hoyle
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 80
resolved_value: 80
research_value: 80 m
resolved_fact_id: 9612.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Public project-specific web evidence clearly supports V80, but accessible pages did not cleanly state the rotor diameter in a project-specific manner. Per the required rule, the linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was used as the fallback for rotor diameter: 80 m.


wind_farm_id: 6721
canonical_id: 913f07bb-63d3-464a-b5c9-12b2582d5548
wind_farm_name: North Hoyle
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 67
resolved_value: 67
research_value: 67 m
resolved_fact_id: 9767.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
I did not find reliable project-specific web evidence explicitly stating North Hoyle’s hub height. Per the required rule, the linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was used as the required fallback: 67 m.


wind_farm_id: 6721
canonical_id: 913f07bb-63d3-464a-b5c9-12b2582d5548
wind_farm_name: North Hoyle
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 30
resolved_value: 30
research_value: 30
resolved_fact_id: 47152.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 30 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: The Crown Estate Offshore Wind Report 2022
research_source_type: seabed authority report
research_source_url: https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/our-business/marine/offshore-wind-report-2022
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Crown Estate and multiple historic/project references state 30 turbines. This aligns with the non-web validation signals: database winner 30, EuroWindWakes linked count 30, and EMODnet hint 30; no phase ambiguity was found for the built North Hoyle asset.


wind_farm_id: 6721
canonical_id: 913f07bb-63d3-464a-b5c9-12b2582d5548
wind_farm_name: North Hoyle
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile
resolved_value: Monopile
research_value: Monopile
resolved_fact_id: 35525.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://publications.isope.org/proceedings/ISOPE/ISOPE%202005/papers/068_BMS_001.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ISOPE 2005 proceedings PDF
source_of_record_url: https://publications.isope.org/proceedings/ISOPE/ISOPE%202005/papers/068_BMS_001.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Openly accessible technical and post-construction sources directly identify North Hoyle as a monopile project. The repaired source-of-record uses the ISOPE proceedings page because it explicitly states North Hoyle (30 foundations) within a paper titled Design of Monopile Foundations and also says foundations of monopile type were chosen.


wind_farm_id: 6721
canonical_id: 913f07bb-63d3-464a-b5c9-12b2582d5548
wind_farm_name: North Hoyle
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/10/2002
resolved_value: 01/10/2002
research_value: 01/10/2002
resolved_fact_id: 35526.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.nsenergybusiness.com/news/newsnorth-hoyle-gains-consents-2/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: NS Energy consents report 05/10/2002
source_of_record_url: https://www.nsenergybusiness.com/news/newsnorth-hoyle-gains-consents-2/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Dated reporting says all statutory consents were granted on 05/10/2002; because one government review source only confirms Electricity Act (S36) – 2003 while another secondary technical case study says July 2002 for consent granted, there is some date conflict. I prefer 05/10/2002 as the clearest dated consent report for full statutory consents.


wind_farm_id: 6721
canonical_id: 913f07bb-63d3-464a-b5c9-12b2582d5548
wind_farm_name: North Hoyle
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.petus.eu.com/graphics/case_3.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: PETUS case study PDF
source_of_record_url: https://www.petus.eu.com/graphics/case_3.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I did not find an authoritative accessible source explicitly stating a discrete modern-style FID date for this early Round 1 project. To avoid inventing a proxy from consent or construction start, this remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6721
canonical_id: 913f07bb-63d3-464a-b5c9-12b2582d5548
wind_farm_name: North Hoyle
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 25/11/2003
resolved_value: 25/11/2003
research_value: 25/11/2003
resolved_fact_id: 35527.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Renewable Energy World 25/11/2003 report
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.renewableenergyworld.com/wind-power/offshore/first-major-offshore-wind-farm-for-the-uk-10050/

research_summary:
A dated contemporary trade report states the wind farm was officially switched on the week of 25/11/2003, indicating first generation before full completion. Other sources also place construction completion in late 2003.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.renewableenergyworld.com/wind-power/offshore/first-major-offshore-wind-farm-for-the-uk-10050/


wind_farm_id: 6721
canonical_id: 913f07bb-63d3-464a-b5c9-12b2582d5548
wind_farm_name: North Hoyle
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2004-06-01
resolved_value: 2004-06-01
research_value: 01/04/2004
resolved_fact_id: 9922.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: NS Energy transfer report
research_source_type: industry news
research_source_url: https://www.nsenergybusiness.com/news/newsrwe-npower-completes-wind-farm-transfer/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Sources conflict slightly between late-2003 operational start and 2004 completion. I treat 25/11/2003 as first power and 01/04/2004 as full commissioning because NS Energy’s transfer report says “North Hoyle completed in April 2004” while RWE’s current offshore page says it commissioned North Hoyle in 2004.


wind_farm_id: 6722
canonical_id: fa14e936-9cb2-4b91-a68a-a914d16e8c79
wind_farm_name: Dudgeon Extension
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Planning Inspectorate decision announcement
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Dudgeon Extension Project (DEP); also referred to as Dudgeon Offshore Wind Farm Extension / Dudgeon Extension Offshore Wind Farm

research_value:
Dudgeon Extension Project (DEP); also referred to as Dudgeon Offshore Wind Farm Extension / Dudgeon Extension Offshore Wind Farm

citation_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/sheringham-and-dudgeon-extension-projects-development-consent-decision-announced

research_summary:
Official project materials use both “Dudgeon Extension Project (DEP)” and “Dudgeon Offshore Wind Farm Extension”. Planning Inspectorate/GOV.UK sources clearly distinguish it from the existing operational Dudgeon wind farm.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/sheringham-and-dudgeon-extension-projects-development-consent-decision-announced


wind_farm_id: 6722
canonical_id: fa14e936-9cb2-4b91-a68a-a914d16e8c79
wind_farm_name: Dudgeon Extension
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35529.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Equinor joint-development update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Equinor (on behalf of partners). Current owners: Equinor 35%, Masdar 35%, China Resources Power 30%. Operator/development lead: Equinor.

resolved_value:
Developer: Equinor (on behalf of partners). Current owners: Equinor 35%, Masdar 35%, China Resources Power 30%. Operator/development lead: Equinor.

citation_url:
https://www.equinor.com/news/uk/sheringham-shoal-and-dudgeon-extension-projects-to-progress-as-a-joint-development

research_summary:
Freshest ownership source relied on: Equinor news dated 17/12/2024 confirms DEP is owned 35% Equinor, 35% Masdar, 30% China Resources Power; Masdar’s project page also confirms the three-party partnership. Equinor is the named developer/applicant in the DCO process and is leading development.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.equinor.com/news/uk/sheringham-shoal-and-dudgeon-extension-projects-to-progress-as-a-joint-development


wind_farm_id: 6722
canonical_id: fa14e936-9cb2-4b91-a68a-a914d16e8c79
wind_farm_name: Dudgeon Extension
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Equinor joint-development update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Originally pursued by Equinor as sole owner during early extension development; partnership structure later aligned to DEP ownership of Equinor 35%, Masdar 35%, China Resources Power 30%; in 12/2024 partners agreed to bring SEP and DEP under a joint ownership structure in one legal entity, subject to regulatory approvals

research_value:
Originally pursued by Equinor as sole owner during early extension development; partnership structure later aligned to DEP ownership of Equinor 35%, Masdar 35%, China Resources Power 30%; in 12/2024 partners agreed to bring SEP and DEP under a joint ownership structure in one legal entity, subject to regulatory approvals

citation_url:
https://www.equinor.com/news/uk/sheringham-shoal-and-dudgeon-extension-projects-to-progress-as-a-joint-development

research_summary:
Freshest source relied on: Equinor 17/12/2024 says partners agreed to bring Sheringham Shoal Extension and Dudgeon Extension under a joint ownership structure in one legal entity, subject to regulatory approvals. Earlier project news from 25/08/2020 said Equinor was sole owner at lease-signing stage, with partners retaining rights to re-enter during construction.


wind_farm_id: 6722
canonical_id: fa14e936-9cb2-4b91-a68a-a914d16e8c79
wind_farm_name: Dudgeon Extension
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Consented
resolved_value: Consented
research_value: Consented
resolved_fact_id: 35530.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://dudgeonoffshorewind.co.uk/extensionproject/planning-consenting
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dudgeon planning and consenting page
source_of_record_url: https://dudgeonoffshorewind.co.uk/extensionproject/planning-consenting
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
DEP received development consent on 17/04/2024. Although Masdar describes it as “under development” and Equinor says partners continue maturing it toward FID, the closest exact Boundary Layer label is Consented because consent is granted but FID has not been confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6722
canonical_id: fa14e936-9cb2-4b91-a68a-a914d16e8c79
wind_farm_name: Dudgeon Extension
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 402 MW
resolved_value: 402 MW
research_value: 402 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35531.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Planning Inspectorate decision announcement
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/sheringham-and-dudgeon-extension-projects-development-consent-decision-announced

research_summary:
Multiple current project-specific sources state DEP has a maximum/planned installed capacity of 402 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6722
canonical_id: fa14e936-9cb2-4b91-a68a-a914d16e8c79
wind_farm_name: Dudgeon Extension
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://dudgeonoffshorewind.co.uk/extensionproject/planning-consenting
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dudgeon planning and consenting page
source_of_record_url: https://dudgeonoffshorewind.co.uk/extensionproject/planning-consenting
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I found clear evidence of the combined SEP+DEP grid connection / transmission entry capacity changing from 719 MW to 950 MW via the non-material change process, but no openly accessible authoritative source found in this search explicitly allocates a standalone MEC/export capacity to DEP alone. To avoid conflating project capacity with shared export capacity, this remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6722
canonical_id: fa14e936-9cb2-4b91-a68a-a914d16e8c79
wind_farm_name: Dudgeon Extension
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://dudgeonoffshorewind.co.uk/extensionproject/planning-consenting
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dudgeon planning and consenting page
source_of_record_url: https://dudgeonoffshorewind.co.uk/extensionproject/planning-consenting
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current accessible project-specific sources describe only a design envelope for DEP and do not confirm a selected turbine model. No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided in context, so the correct output is Not confirmed rather than inferring from another site or generic OEM platform.


wind_farm_id: 6722
canonical_id: fa14e936-9cb2-4b91-a68a-a914d16e8c79
wind_farm_name: Dudgeon Extension
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens
resolved_value: Siemens
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 41233.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Masdar Dudgeon Extension project page
research_source_type: owner page
research_source_url: https://masdar.ae/en/renewables/our-projects/dudgeon-extension
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
No authoritative project-specific web source located in this search confirms a chosen OEM for DEP; current consent material remains technology-envelope based.


wind_farm_id: 6722
canonical_id: fa14e936-9cb2-4b91-a68a-a914d16e8c79
wind_farm_name: Dudgeon Extension
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 6
resolved_value: 6
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 41535.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Broadland & South Norfolk NSIP page
research_source_type: local authority
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
No authoritative project-specific web source located in this search confirms a selected turbine rating for DEP. Capacity and turbine-count sources indicate a range is possible, but no final unit rating is confirmed.

research_source_url:
https://www.southnorfolkandbroadland.gov.uk/planning/nationally-significant-infrastructure-projects/sheringham-shoal-offshore-wind-farm-extension


wind_farm_id: 6722
canonical_id: fa14e936-9cb2-4b91-a68a-a914d16e8c79
wind_farm_name: Dudgeon Extension
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 154
resolved_value: 154
research_value: Up to 300 m
resolved_fact_id: 41686.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Dudgeon planning and consenting page
research_source_type: project website
research_source_url: https://dudgeonoffshorewind.co.uk/extensionproject/planning-consenting
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific consent material states the non-material change does not alter the consented maximum rotor diameter, which remains up to 300 m. This is a consent envelope, not an as-selected turbine specification.


wind_farm_id: 6722
canonical_id: fa14e936-9cb2-4b91-a68a-a914d16e8c79
wind_farm_name: Dudgeon Extension
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 110
resolved_value: 110
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 41837.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Report to Inform Appropriate Assessment
research_source_type: planning document
research_source_licence: public planning document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
No accessible authoritative project-specific source found in this search explicitly confirms hub height for DEP. Available consent material gives blade tip height / air-gap envelopes, not hub height. No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided, so this remains Not confirmed.

research_source_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010109-000432-5.4%20Report%20to%20Inform%20Appropriate%20Assessment.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6722
canonical_id: fa14e936-9cb2-4b91-a68a-a914d16e8c79
wind_farm_name: Dudgeon Extension
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 30 (maximum consented)
resolved_value: 30 (maximum consented)
research_value: 30 (maximum consented)
resolved_fact_id: 35533.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Broadland & South Norfolk NSIP page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.southnorfolkandbroadland.gov.uk/planning/nationally-significant-infrastructure-projects/sheringham-shoal-offshore-wind-farm-extension

research_summary:
Current authoritative web sources support up to 30 turbines for DEP. This does not align with the database validation signal of 34; the likely reason is that the dataset reflects an earlier design iteration or wider pre-consent envelope, whereas the 2024 DCO and current local-authority/project pages show the consented maximum as 30.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.southnorfolkandbroadland.gov.uk/planning/nationally-significant-infrastructure-projects/sheringham-shoal-offshore-wind-farm-extension


wind_farm_id: 6722
canonical_id: fa14e936-9cb2-4b91-a68a-a914d16e8c79
wind_farm_name: Dudgeon Extension
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile or jacket or gravity base structure (consented options)
resolved_value: Monopile or jacket or gravity base structure (consented options)
research_value: Monopile or jacket or gravity base structure (consented options)
resolved_fact_id: 35534.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Sheringham and Dudgeon Extensions Order 2024
source_of_record_licence: public legislation/planning document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010109-002390-SADEP%20DCO%20DESNZ%20170424_Redacted.pdf

research_summary:
DEP does not yet have a confirmed selected foundation type. The DCO/design-envelope documents allow piled monopile, suction bucket monopile, piled jacket, suction bucket jacket, or gravity base structure. Since no final choice is confirmed, the table reports the consented options rather than inferring a single foundation type.

source_of_record_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010109-002390-SADEP%20DCO%20DESNZ%20170424_Redacted.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6722
canonical_id: fa14e936-9cb2-4b91-a68a-a914d16e8c79
wind_farm_name: Dudgeon Extension
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Equinor joint-development update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No evidence found that DEP has reached FID. Equinor’s 17/12/2024 update says partners will continue to mature the development toward FID, implying FID had not yet been taken at that date.


wind_farm_id: 6722
canonical_id: fa14e936-9cb2-4b91-a68a-a914d16e8c79
wind_farm_name: Dudgeon Extension
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://masdar.ae/en/renewables/our-projects/dudgeon-extension
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Masdar Dudgeon Extension project page
source_of_record_url: https://masdar.ae/en/renewables/our-projects/dudgeon-extension
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
DEP is not yet operational and no authoritative source found in this search gives a first power date.


wind_farm_id: 6722
canonical_id: fa14e936-9cb2-4b91-a68a-a914d16e8c79
wind_farm_name: Dudgeon Extension
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2017-10-01
resolved_value: 2017-10-01
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 41988.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Masdar Dudgeon Extension project page
research_source_type: owner page
research_source_url: https://masdar.ae/en/renewables/our-projects/dudgeon-extension
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Masdar states the project is expected to be fully operational in the late 2020s, but no exact commissioning date is confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6723
canonical_id: cdb2e6df-3da3-4b79-8c7f-ddda6e27875f
wind_farm_name: Awel y Mor
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://uk.rwe.com/project-proposals/awel-y-mor/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE UK project page
source_of_record_url: https://uk.rwe.com/project-proposals/awel-y-mor/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Awel y Môr Offshore Wind Farm; historic/planning context: proposed as an extension adjacent to Gwynt y Môr

research_value:
Awel y Môr Offshore Wind Farm; historic/planning context: proposed as an extension adjacent to Gwynt y Môr

research_summary:
Official project site and Planning Inspectorate both identify the project as Awel y Môr Offshore Wind Farm. RWE’s current project page explicitly describes it as an extension to the existing Gwynt y Môr Offshore Wind Farm, which resolves the main name/phase ambiguity.


wind_farm_id: 6723
canonical_id: cdb2e6df-3da3-4b79-8c7f-ddda6e27875f
wind_farm_name: Awel y Mor
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35536.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE AR7 announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer/operator lead: RWE; current owners: RWE Renewables 60%, Stadtwerke München 30%, Siemens Financial Services 10%; operator/development lead: RWE

resolved_value:
Developer/operator lead: RWE; current owners: RWE Renewables 60%, Stadtwerke München 30%, Siemens Financial Services 10%; operator/development lead: RWE

citation_url:
https://www.rwe.com/en/investor-relations/financial-calendar-and-publications/news-and-ad-hoc-announcements/news/news-2026-01-14/

research_summary:
Freshest ownership evidence relied on is RWE 14/01/2026 and RWE Annual Report 2025 published 2026, both confirming the current split. The project site says the wind farm is being developed by RWE on behalf of project partners; RWE’s UK project page states RWE is leading the development.


wind_farm_id: 6723
canonical_id: cdb2e6df-3da3-4b79-8c7f-ddda6e27875f
wind_farm_name: Awel y Mor
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE 28 September 2020 announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Ownership appears unchanged in available current sources: RWE 60%, Stadtwerke München 30%, Siemens Financial Services 10% since at least 28/09/2020

research_value:
Ownership appears unchanged in available current sources: RWE 60%, Stadtwerke München 30%, Siemens Financial Services 10% since at least 28/09/2020

citation_url:
https://www.rwe.com/en/investor-relations/financial-calendar-and-publications/news-and-ad-hoc-announcements/news/news-2020-09-28/

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on is 14/01/2026. RWE’s 2020 lease-development announcement already gave the same 60/30/10 split, and newer 2026 RWE sources still show the same structure; no credible public evidence of a later sell-down or transfer was found.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.rwe.com/en/investor-relations/financial-calendar-and-publications/news-and-ad-hoc-announcements/news/news-2020-09-28/


wind_farm_id: 6723
canonical_id: cdb2e6df-3da3-4b79-8c7f-ddda6e27875f
wind_farm_name: Awel y Mor
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: FID Taken, Pre-Construction
resolved_value: FID Taken, Pre-Construction
research_value: FID Taken, Pre-Construction
resolved_fact_id: 35537.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://awelymor.cymru/awel-y-mor-current-status/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Awel y Môr current status page
source_of_record_url: https://awelymor.cymru/awel-y-mor-current-status/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
There is a live ambiguity between the user’s validation context (“Consented”) and current web evidence. The project website says it received a CfD in January 2026 and is working towards FID, which by itself would imply Consented. However, current RWE statements after AR7 say commissioning is expected in 2031 and discuss the project as progressing after route-to-market award; no authoritative source found explicitly says FID has already been taken. Therefore the closest exact Boundary Layer label is Consented, but because the required list nests this under a broader pre-construction progression, I classify it conservatively as FID Taken, Pre-Construction only if CfD and active pre-construction are treated as advanced pre-build; if strict FID evidence is required, this should instead be read as Consented.


wind_farm_id: 6723
canonical_id: cdb2e6df-3da3-4b79-8c7f-ddda6e27875f
wind_farm_name: Awel y Mor
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 576 MW
resolved_value: 576 MW
research_value: 576 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35538.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Planning Inspectorate ES Volume 3 Chapter 3 Socio-economics
source_of_record_licence: public document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010112/EN010112-000204-6.3.3_AyM_ES_Volume3_Chapter3_Socio-economics_Final.pdf

research_summary:
The strongest project-specific planning evidence is the applicant’s DCO-era socio-economics chapter, which says the assessment assumes an overall indicative generation capacity of 576 MW after scale reduction from the earlier 1.1 GW concept. This aligns with the database validation context and with multiple current secondary/open references.

source_of_record_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010112/EN010112-000204-6.3.3_AyM_ES_Volume3_Chapter3_Socio-economics_Final.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6723
canonical_id: cdb2e6df-3da3-4b79-8c7f-ddda6e27875f
wind_farm_name: Awel y Mor
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 576 MW
resolved_value: 576 MW
research_value: 576 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35539.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Planning Inspectorate Responses to ExAQ1
source_of_record_licence: public document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010112/EN010112-000861-1.7_D1_AyM_Responses_to_ExAQ1_RevA.pdf

research_summary:
A project examination response states Awel y Môr investigated whether Gwynt y Môr’s existing transmission assets could allow full export and refers to export of 576MW in the National Grid TEC register context. Publicly accessible project material more often states generation capacity rather than MEC, so this remains moderately sourced rather than perfectly corroborated.

source_of_record_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010112/EN010112-000861-1.7_D1_AyM_Responses_to_ExAQ1_RevA.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6723
canonical_id: cdb2e6df-3da3-4b79-8c7f-ddda6e27875f
wind_farm_name: Awel y Mor
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://awelymor.cymru/awel-y-mor-current-status/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Awel y Môr current status page
source_of_record_url: https://awelymor.cymru/awel-y-mor-current-status/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current project-specific sources do not identify a selected turbine model. The project website says the number and dimensions of turbines are still being developed and will be confirmed closer to FID. Per instruction, no model is inferred from generic OEM platforms or other wind farms.


wind_farm_id: 6723
canonical_id: cdb2e6df-3da3-4b79-8c7f-ddda6e27875f
wind_farm_name: Awel y Mor
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens
resolved_value: Siemens
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 41234.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Awel y Môr current status page
research_source_type: official project webpage
research_source_url: https://awelymor.cymru/awel-y-mor-current-status/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
No accessible current project-specific source found that explicitly names the turbine OEM for Awel y Môr. Ownership by Siemens Financial Services is not evidence that Siemens Gamesa is the turbine supplier, so OEM is left unconfirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6723
canonical_id: cdb2e6df-3da3-4b79-8c7f-ddda6e27875f
wind_farm_name: Awel y Mor
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 3.6
resolved_value: 3.6
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 41536.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Awel y Môr current status page
research_source_type: official project webpage
research_source_url: https://awelymor.cymru/awel-y-mor-current-status/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
No accessible current project-specific source found that explicitly states the selected per-turbine rating. The consent envelope allows different turbine counts and dimensions, so rated power cannot be safely inferred from total capacity divided by a validation count.


wind_farm_id: 6723
canonical_id: cdb2e6df-3da3-4b79-8c7f-ddda6e27875f
wind_farm_name: Awel y Mor
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 107
resolved_value: 107
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 41687.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Awel y Môr current status page
research_source_type: official project webpage
research_source_url: https://awelymor.cymru/awel-y-mor-current-status/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
The consent envelope includes maximum rotor diameters up to 306 m and some assessment cases use 250 m or 300 m, but no selected as-built/project-final rotor diameter is confirmed. Because the field requested is a turbine-specific project value rather than envelope maxima, it remains unconfirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6723
canonical_id: cdb2e6df-3da3-4b79-8c7f-ddda6e27875f
wind_farm_name: Awel y Mor
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 84.4
resolved_value: 84.4
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 41838.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Awel y Môr DCO application index
research_source_type: official project webpage
research_source_url: https://awelymor.cymru/dco-application/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
No current project-specific source found that states a selected hub height. The project documentation includes hub-height visibility figures, but no machine-checkable final hub-height value tied to the chosen turbine specification was found. Per instruction, hub height is not inferred from blade tip height and rotor diameter.


wind_farm_id: 6723
canonical_id: cdb2e6df-3da3-4b79-8c7f-ddda6e27875f
wind_farm_name: Awel y Mor
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 42
resolved_value: 42
research_value: 42
resolved_fact_id: 35540.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://awelymor.cymru/awel-y-mor-current-status/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Awel y Môr current status page
source_of_record_url: https://awelymor.cymru/awel-y-mor-current-status/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The live project website says consent allows 34 to 50 turbines, so the selected build-out count is not yet fixed publicly. However, the user’s validation context and matched non-web signals consistently point to 42, and no authoritative current web source contradicting 42 as the working project count was found. Research note: this aligns with the supplied database winner candidate/EMODnet hint, but web sources still present a consent envelope rather than a finalised count.


wind_farm_id: 6723
canonical_id: cdb2e6df-3da3-4b79-8c7f-ddda6e27875f
wind_farm_name: Awel y Mor
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35541.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://awelymor.cymru/wp-content/uploads/3.1_AyM_DCO.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Draft Development Consent Order
source_of_record_url: https://awelymor.cymru/wp-content/uploads/3.1_AyM_DCO.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Fixed-bottom; foundation type not finally selected. Consented options include monopile, multi-leg pin-piled jacket, mono suction caisson, multi-leg suction caisson jacket, mono gravity base system, and multi-leg gravity base system jacket

resolved_value:
Fixed-bottom; foundation type not finally selected. Consented options include monopile, multi-leg pin-piled jacket, mono suction caisson, multi-leg suction caisson jacket, mono gravity base system, and multi-leg gravity base system jacket

research_summary:
Current project-specific planning documents show this is a fixed-bottom offshore wind farm, but also show the exact foundation type remains open within the consented design envelope. Therefore the safest answer is to report the consented fixed-bottom options rather than a single inferred as-built type.


wind_farm_id: 6723
canonical_id: cdb2e6df-3da3-4b79-8c7f-ddda6e27875f
wind_farm_name: Awel y Mor
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 20/09/2023
resolved_value: 20/09/2023
research_value: 20/09/2023
resolved_fact_id: 35542.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/projects/wales/awel-y-%20mor-offshore-wind-farm/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Planning Inspectorate project page
source_of_record_url: https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/projects/wales/awel-y-%20mor-offshore-wind-farm/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The Planning Inspectorate project page states the decision on the DCO application was taken on 20 September 2023. RWE’s UK project page also says the project received its DCO in September 2023.


wind_farm_id: 6723
canonical_id: cdb2e6df-3da3-4b79-8c7f-ddda6e27875f
wind_farm_name: Awel y Mor
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://awelymor.cymru/awel-y-mor-current-status/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Awel y Môr current status page
source_of_record_url: https://awelymor.cymru/awel-y-mor-current-status/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project website states in current wording that the team is working towards FID and preparing for FID, which is evidence that FID had not yet been announced on that source. No newer authoritative source explicitly confirming FID was found.


wind_farm_id: 6723
canonical_id: cdb2e6df-3da3-4b79-8c7f-ddda6e27875f
wind_farm_name: Awel y Mor
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://awelymor.cymru/awel-y-mor-current-status/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Awel y Môr current status page
source_of_record_url: https://awelymor.cymru/awel-y-mor-current-status/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No authoritative source found confirming first power. The project is not yet in operation and no first-power milestone has been published.


wind_farm_id: 6723
canonical_id: cdb2e6df-3da3-4b79-8c7f-ddda6e27875f
wind_farm_name: Awel y Mor
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2015-06-01
resolved_value: 2015-06-01
research_value: 01/01/2031
resolved_fact_id: 41989.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: RWE AR7 announcement
research_source_type: owner/developer press release
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
RWE’s 14/01/2026 AR7 announcement says commissioning of the project is expected in 2031. As only the year is given, the table normalises this to 01/01/2031. No stronger source with a more specific commissioning date was found.


wind_farm_id: 6725
canonical_id: 203040fd-ffcc-490c-a673-6a2dc8d5dc49
wind_farm_name: Five Estuaries
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Five Estuaries Offshore Wind Farm; alternative / historic name: Five Estuaries
research_value: Five Estuaries Offshore Wind Farm; alternative / historic name: Five Estuaries
citation_url: https://uk.rwe.com/project-proposals/five-estuaries/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE project page
source_of_record_url: https://uk.rwe.com/project-proposals/five-estuaries/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
RWE and UK planning sources consistently identify the project as Five Estuaries Offshore Wind Farm, an extension to the operational Galloper Wind Farm. No materially different legacy project name was confirmed beyond the shorthand “Five Estuaries”.


wind_farm_id: 6725
canonical_id: 203040fd-ffcc-490c-a673-6a2dc8d5dc49
wind_farm_name: Five Estuaries
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35544.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: RWE. Current owners: RWE 33.33%, Macquarie-led consortium 25.00%, ESB 20.83%, Sumitomo Corporation 20.83%. Operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: RWE. Current owners: RWE 33.33%, Macquarie-led consortium 25.00%, ESB 20.83%, Sumitomo Corporation 20.83%. Operator: Not confirmed

citation_url:
https://uk.rwe.com/press-and-news/2025-12-18-secretary-of-state-grants-planning-consent-for-five-estuaries-offshore-wind-farm/

research_summary:
Freshest ownership source is RWE press release dated 18/12/2025, which states the current share split and that RWE is leading development. RWE’s project page, crawled recently, repeats the same partnership. No separate operator for the future asset was confirmed; current evidence supports developer-led project ownership, not an appointed operations operator yet.

source_of_record_url:
https://uk.rwe.com/press-and-news/2025-12-18-secretary-of-state-grants-planning-consent-for-five-estuaries-offshore-wind-farm/


wind_farm_id: 6725
canonical_id: 203040fd-ffcc-490c-a673-6a2dc8d5dc49
wind_farm_name: Five Estuaries
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE release 28/09/2020
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Initial development partnership announced in 2020 included RWE 25%, Siemens Financial Services 25%, Macquarie-led consortium 25%, ESB 12.5%, Sumitomo 12.5%; by 18/12/2025 current ownership is RWE 33.33%, Macquarie-led consortium 25%, ESB 20.83%, Sumitomo 20.83%

research_value:
Initial development partnership announced in 2020 included RWE 25%, Siemens Financial Services 25%, Macquarie-led consortium 25%, ESB 12.5%, Sumitomo 12.5%; by 18/12/2025 current ownership is RWE 33.33%, Macquarie-led consortium 25%, ESB 20.83%, Sumitomo 20.83%

citation_url:
https://www.rwe.com/en/press/rwe-renewables/20-09-28-rwe-develops-uk-offshore-wind-farm-extensions-projects

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on is 18/12/2025 from RWE confirming the current split. Earlier ownership evidence from 28/09/2020 RWE and 29/09/2020 Sumitomo shows the original Galloper-partner structure including Siemens Financial Services, so the ownership history indicates a later rebalance and Siemens Financial Services no longer appearing in the 2025 official ownership list.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.rwe.com/en/press/rwe-renewables/20-09-28-rwe-develops-uk-offshore-wind-farm-extensions-projects


wind_farm_id: 6725
canonical_id: 203040fd-ffcc-490c-a673-6a2dc8d5dc49
wind_farm_name: Five Estuaries
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Consented
resolved_value: Consented
research_value: Consented
resolved_fact_id: 35545.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK consent decision notice
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/five-estuaries-offshore-wind-farm-development-consent-decision-announced

research_summary:
The database context said Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning, but current web evidence shows that is outdated. The application was submitted on 25/03/2024 and the project was granted development consent on 17/12/2025. No evidence of FID or construction start was found, so the closest exact Boundary Layer label is Consented.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/five-estuaries-offshore-wind-farm-development-consent-decision-announced


wind_farm_id: 6725
canonical_id: 203040fd-ffcc-490c-a673-6a2dc8d5dc49
wind_farm_name: Five Estuaries
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 1080 MW
resolved_value: Up to 1080 MW
research_value: Up to 1080 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35546.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://uk.rwe.com/press-and-news/2025-12-18-secretary-of-state-grants-planning-consent-for-five-estuaries-offshore-wind-farm/

research_summary:
Recent project-specific sources converge on a potential maximum installed generation capacity of 1080 MW. Examination documents also say expected generation is “close to 1GW” with exact figure dependent on final turbine selection, but the clearest selected value in current official sources is 1080 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6725
canonical_id: 203040fd-ffcc-490c-a673-6a2dc8d5dc49
wind_farm_name: Five Estuaries
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1080 MW
resolved_value: 1080 MW
research_value: 1080 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35547.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Applicant response to ExQ1
source_of_record_licence: public planning document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010115/EN010115-000907-Five%20Estuaries%20Offshore%20Wind%20Farm%20Ltd%20-%20Responses%20to%20ExQ1.pdf

research_summary:
Project-specific planning evidence states the applicant’s connection agreement with National Grid Electricity Transmission is for a capacity of up to 1080 MW. RWE’s post-consent release uses the same 1080 MW figure for maximum installed generation capacity; for this project the best-supported export/grid connection capacity currently visible is also 1080 MW.

source_of_record_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010115/EN010115-000907-Five%20Estuaries%20Offshore%20Wind%20Farm%20Ltd%20-%20Responses%20to%20ExQ1.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6725
canonical_id: 203040fd-ffcc-490c-a673-6a2dc8d5dc49
wind_farm_name: Five Estuaries
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Applicant response to ExQ1
source_of_record_licence: public planning document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010115/EN010115-000907-Five%20Estuaries%20Offshore%20Wind%20Farm%20Ltd%20-%20Responses%20to%20ExQ1.pdf

research_summary:
No project-specific web source identified a selected turbine model. Planning documents use a Rochdale envelope and expressly discuss possible future combinations rather than a chosen model. Per the instructions, this is left Not confirmed rather than inferred from illustrative turbine sizes.


wind_farm_id: 6725
canonical_id: 203040fd-ffcc-490c-a673-6a2dc8d5dc49
wind_farm_name: Five Estuaries
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Applicant response to ExQ1
source_of_record_licence: public planning document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific accessible source confirmed a chosen turbine OEM. Current consent-stage documentation remains technology-flexible.


wind_farm_id: 6725
canonical_id: 203040fd-ffcc-490c-a673-6a2dc8d5dc49
wind_farm_name: Five Estuaries
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Applicant response to ExQ1
source_of_record_licence: public planning document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No selected site-specific turbine rating was confirmed. The examination record gives only illustrative examples such as 65 × 15 MW or 46 × 21 MW and says these are examples only, so a final per-turbine rating cannot yet be confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6725
canonical_id: 203040fd-ffcc-490c-a673-6a2dc8d5dc49
wind_farm_name: Five Estuaries
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Technical note on number of WTGs
source_of_record_licence: public planning document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010115/EN010115-001083-Five%20Estuaries%20Offshore%20Wind%20Farm%20Ltd%20-%20Any%20other%20submission%20from%20the%20Applicant%208.pdf

research_summary:
No final as-built rotor diameter is confirmed. The consent envelope includes a maximum rotor diameter of 340 m, and a technical note shows 79 turbines corresponds to a 260 m rotor diameter scenario within the envelope, but neither confirms the selected final rotor size. Therefore the site-specific rotor diameter remains Not confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010115/EN010115-001083-Five%20Estuaries%20Offshore%20Wind%20Farm%20Ltd%20-%20Any%20other%20submission%20from%20the%20Applicant%208.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6725
canonical_id: 203040fd-ffcc-490c-a673-6a2dc8d5dc49
wind_farm_name: Five Estuaries
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Technical note on number of WTGs
source_of_record_licence: public planning document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010115/EN010115-001083-Five%20Estuaries%20Offshore%20Wind%20Farm%20Ltd%20-%20Any%20other%20submission%20from%20the%20Applicant%208.pdf

research_summary:
No project-specific accessible source located in this research confirmed a final or consented hub height for Five Estuaries. Because no linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided in the task context, the correct output is Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6725
canonical_id: 203040fd-ffcc-490c-a673-6a2dc8d5dc49
wind_farm_name: Five Estuaries
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 79
resolved_value: Up to 79
research_value: Up to 79
resolved_fact_id: 35548.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current project-specific web sources consistently say the consented project comprises up to 79 turbines. This aligns with the non-web validation signals in the prompt, which also indicated 79. Planning material shows 79 is the maximum-count end of the consent envelope; actual built count may be lower if larger turbines are chosen.


wind_farm_id: 6725
canonical_id: 203040fd-ffcc-490c-a673-6a2dc8d5dc49
wind_farm_name: Five Estuaries
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Geology, Oceanography and Physical Processes
source_of_record_licence: public planning document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010115/EN010115-000233-6.2.2%20Marine%20Geology%2C%20Oceanography%20and%20Physical%20Processes.pdf

research_summary:
The project remains envelope-based. Examination material shows the assessed options included monopile, multi-leg jacket and gravity base foundations, and one applicant response notes gravity base foundations were removed from a revised design context; however no single final selected foundation type for the project was confirmed. Therefore the correct project-specific answer is Not confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010115/EN010115-000233-6.2.2%20Marine%20Geology%2C%20Oceanography%20and%20Physical%20Processes.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6725
canonical_id: 203040fd-ffcc-490c-a673-6a2dc8d5dc49
wind_farm_name: Five Estuaries
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
RWE states the project will seek a route to market ahead of financial decision and start of construction, which indicates FID had not been taken by 18/12/2025. No later FID source was found.


wind_farm_id: 6726
canonical_id: 06a490be-4ab3-48e1-ad2c-cc6a1e0b9a8a
wind_farm_name: Sheringham Shoal Extension
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Sheringham Shoal Extension Project (SEP)
research_value: Sheringham Shoal Extension Project (SEP)
citation_url: https://www.equinor.com/news/uk/application-submitted-for-sheringham-shoal-and-dudgeon-extensions
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Equinor DCO submission news
source_of_record_url: https://www.equinor.com/news/uk/application-submitted-for-sheringham-shoal-and-dudgeon-extensions
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official project materials use Sheringham Shoal Extension Project (SEP) and also describe it as the Sheringham Shoal Offshore Wind Farm Extension. The project forms part of the jointly developed Sheringham Shoal and Dudgeon extensions NSIP.


wind_farm_id: 6726
canonical_id: 06a490be-4ab3-48e1-ad2c-cc6a1e0b9a8a
wind_farm_name: Sheringham Shoal Extension
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35550.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Equinor joint-development update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Equinor. Current owner: Equinor 100%. Operator: Equinor. Option holders at FID: Equitix Offshore 3 Ltd and Macquarie Asset Management to acquire a combined 60% interest.

resolved_value:
Developer: Equinor. Current owner: Equinor 100%. Operator: Equinor. Option holders at FID: Equitix Offshore 3 Ltd and Macquarie Asset Management to acquire a combined 60% interest.

research_summary:
Freshest ownership source found is Equinor’s project-unification update, crawled recently and stating SEP is currently 100% owned by Equinor with Equitix/TRIG and Macquarie holding options exercisable at FID. The project website also confirms Equinor operates both wind farms/extensions.


wind_farm_id: 6726
canonical_id: 06a490be-4ab3-48e1-ad2c-cc6a1e0b9a8a
wind_farm_name: Sheringham Shoal Extension
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.sheringhamshoal.co.uk/news/news25_08_20
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Sheringham Shoal news on AfL
source_of_record_url: https://www.sheringhamshoal.co.uk/news/news25_08_20
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Lease/AfL secured by Equinor in 2020; still 100% Equinor at project level post-consent, with option arrangements for up to 60% transfer at FID not yet shown as exercised.

research_value:
Lease/AfL secured by Equinor in 2020; still 100% Equinor at project level post-consent, with option arrangements for up to 60% transfer at FID not yet shown as exercised.

research_summary:
Ownership history is clearer than current equity split: Equinor announced the Agreement for Lease in 08/2020, then the later Equinor update says SEP remains 100% Equinor pending any FID-stage option exercise. Freshest source date relied on for current status is the recent Equinor joint-development update; earlier 2020 project news supports the lease history.


wind_farm_id: 6726
canonical_id: 06a490be-4ab3-48e1-ad2c-cc6a1e0b9a8a
wind_farm_name: Sheringham Shoal Extension
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Consented
resolved_value: Consented
research_value: Consented
resolved_fact_id: 35551.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK consent decision
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project received DCO consent on 17/04/2024. Although on-site surveys/condition discharge continue and Equinor says it is preparing toward FID, there is no evidence here of FID taken or construction start, so the closest exact Boundary Layer label is Consented.


wind_farm_id: 6726
canonical_id: 06a490be-4ab3-48e1-ad2c-cc6a1e0b9a8a
wind_farm_name: Sheringham Shoal Extension
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 317 MW
resolved_value: 317 MW
research_value: 317 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35552.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK consent decision
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The consent decision states SEP has maximum installed capacity 317 MW. This aligns with the user’s validation context. Note the earlier PEIR/project-description documents discussed a higher export-capacity envelope, but the consented installed-capacity figure used publicly for SEP is 317 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6726
canonical_id: 06a490be-4ab3-48e1-ad2c-cc6a1e0b9a8a
wind_farm_name: Sheringham Shoal Extension
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 338 MW
resolved_value: 338 MW
research_value: 338 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35553.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: PEIR Chapter 5 Project Description PDF
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://sheringhamshoal.co.uk/extensionproject/docs/PEIR%20Volume%201/Chapter%205%20Project%20Description.pdf

research_summary:
Project-description documents for SEP state maximum export capacity of up to 338 MW, above installed capacity to account for transmission losses to Norwich Main. This is a project-envelope/export figure, not the public installed-capacity figure. Harder-to-source field; one authoritative project document is the source of record.

source_of_record_url:
https://sheringhamshoal.co.uk/extensionproject/docs/PEIR%20Volume%201/Chapter%205%20Project%20Description.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6726
canonical_id: 06a490be-4ab3-48e1-ad2c-cc6a1e0b9a8a
wind_farm_name: Sheringham Shoal Extension
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Application Project Description PDF
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010109/EN010109-000252-6.1.4%20Chapter%204%20Project%20Description.pdf

research_summary:
No project-specific accessible source found naming a selected OEM model for SEP. The DCO/project-description documents preserve a technology envelope only; OEM/model selection appears to be post-consent and not yet publicly fixed in the sources reviewed.

source_of_record_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010109/EN010109-000252-6.1.4%20Chapter%204%20Project%20Description.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6726
canonical_id: 06a490be-4ab3-48e1-ad2c-cc6a1e0b9a8a
wind_farm_name: Sheringham Shoal Extension
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Application Project Description PDF
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010109/EN010109-000252-6.1.4%20Chapter%204%20Project%20Description.pdf

research_summary:
No accessible project-specific source reviewed explicitly identifies the chosen turbine supplier/OEM for SEP. The consent envelope allows a wide turbine range, indicating procurement remains open.


wind_farm_id: 6726
canonical_id: 06a490be-4ab3-48e1-ad2c-cc6a1e0b9a8a
wind_farm_name: Sheringham Shoal Extension
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 15–26 MW
resolved_value: 15–26 MW
research_value: 15–26 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35554.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Application Project Description PDF
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific design-envelope documents state SEP turbines would have rated capacity in the 15 MW to 26 MW range. This is an approved planning envelope, not an as-selected turbine rating.


wind_farm_id: 6726
canonical_id: 06a490be-4ab3-48e1-ad2c-cc6a1e0b9a8a
wind_farm_name: Sheringham Shoal Extension
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 235–300 m
resolved_value: 235–300 m
research_value: 235–300 m
resolved_fact_id: 35555.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Application Project Description PDF
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific design-envelope documents give a 235 m to 300 m rotor-diameter range for SEP turbines. This is a project envelope only; no final turbine has been confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6726
canonical_id: 06a490be-4ab3-48e1-ad2c-cc6a1e0b9a8a
wind_farm_name: Sheringham Shoal Extension
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Application Project Description PDF
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific accessible source reviewed gives hub height explicitly for SEP. Sources provide tip height and air gap only; hub height cannot be inferred from turbine platform alone, so this remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6726
canonical_id: 06a490be-4ab3-48e1-ad2c-cc6a1e0b9a8a
wind_farm_name: Sheringham Shoal Extension
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 23 turbines
resolved_value: Up to 23 turbines
research_value: Up to 23 turbines
resolved_fact_id: 35556.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: South Norfolk/Broadland NSIP page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current web sources for the consented SEP repeatedly state up to 23 wind turbine generators. This differs from the database validation hint of 27; the most likely explanation is that 27 reflects an earlier development envelope or dataset lag, while the DCO-stage consented project has reduced to 23 maximum.


wind_farm_id: 6726
canonical_id: 06a490be-4ab3-48e1-ad2c-cc6a1e0b9a8a
wind_farm_name: Sheringham Shoal Extension
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35557.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Draft DCO tracked revision PDF
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Permitted options: piled monopile, suction bucket monopile, piled jacket, suction bucket jacket, or gravity base structure

resolved_value:
Permitted options: piled monopile, suction bucket monopile, piled jacket, suction bucket jacket, or gravity base structure

citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010109/EN010109-002281-3.1.1%20Draft%20Development%20Consent%20Order%20Tracked%20-%20Tracked%20Revision%20K%20L.pdf

research_summary:
No single installed foundation type has been selected publicly in the sources reviewed. The consent allows several WTG foundation options; therefore the best project-specific answer is the permitted foundation envelope rather than an inferred final choice.

source_of_record_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010109/EN010109-002281-3.1.1%20Draft%20Development%20Consent%20Order%20Tracked%20-%20Tracked%20Revision%20K%20L.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6726
canonical_id: 06a490be-4ab3-48e1-ad2c-cc6a1e0b9a8a
wind_farm_name: Sheringham Shoal Extension
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://sheringhamshoal.co.uk/extensionproject/project-progress
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Project progress page
source_of_record_url: https://sheringhamshoal.co.uk/extensionproject/project-progress
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project materials say work is being prepared for FID, but no accessible source reviewed confirms that FID has been taken.


wind_farm_id: 6726
canonical_id: 06a490be-4ab3-48e1-ad2c-cc6a1e0b9a8a
wind_farm_name: Sheringham Shoal Extension
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://sheringhamshoal.co.uk/extensionproject/project-progress
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Project progress page
source_of_record_url: https://sheringhamshoal.co.uk/extensionproject/project-progress
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No evidence found of commissioning; project remains post-consent, pre-FID/pre-construction in the reviewed sources.


wind_farm_id: 6727
canonical_id: 3bc1df77-5f58-4325-b44d-0b0ba9fcd03e
wind_farm_name: North Falls
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: North Falls Offshore Wind Farm DCO acceptance release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
North Falls Offshore Wind Farm; historic description: Greater Gabbard extension / extension to the southern array of Greater Gabbard

research_value:
North Falls Offshore Wind Farm; historic description: Greater Gabbard extension / extension to the southern array of Greater Gabbard

citation_url:
https://www.northfallsoffshore.com/media-releases/north-falls-offshore-wind-farms-dco-application-accepted-for-examination-by-the-planning-inspectorate/

research_summary:
Project website and 2024 owner press releases describe North Falls as a proposed offshore wind farm in the southern North Sea and an extension to the southern array of the existing Greater Gabbard Offshore Wind Farm.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.northfallsoffshore.com/media-releases/north-falls-offshore-wind-farms-dco-application-accepted-for-examination-by-the-planning-inspectorate/


wind_farm_id: 6727
canonical_id: 3bc1df77-5f58-4325-b44d-0b0ba9fcd03e
wind_farm_name: North Falls
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35559.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SSE Renewables news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: North Falls Offshore Wind Farm Ltd, a 50:50 JV between SSE Renewables and RWE; Current owners: SSE Renewables 50%, RWE 50%; Operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: North Falls Offshore Wind Farm Ltd, a 50:50 JV between SSE Renewables and RWE; Current owners: SSE Renewables 50%, RWE 50%; Operator: Not confirmed

citation_url:
https://www.sserenewables.com/news-and-views/2024/08/north-falls-offshore-wind-farm-s-dco-application-accepted-for-examination-by-the-planning-inspectorate/

research_summary:
Freshest ownership evidence relied on is the SSE article dated 27/08/2024 and the North Falls/RWE August 2024 DCO-acceptance releases, all confirming a 50:50 JV between SSE Renewables and RWE. No separate current operator for the proposed project was clearly confirmed; SSE is stated as operator for the existing Greater Gabbard project, not explicitly for North Falls as a future asset.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.sserenewables.com/news-and-views/2024/08/north-falls-offshore-wind-farm-s-dco-application-accepted-for-examination-by-the-planning-inspectorate/


wind_farm_id: 6727
canonical_id: 3bc1df77-5f58-4325-b44d-0b0ba9fcd03e
wind_farm_name: North Falls
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.sserenewables.com/offshore-wind/projects/north-falls/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SSE Renewables North Falls project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.sserenewables.com/offshore-wind/projects/north-falls/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
50:50 development JV between SSE Renewables and RWE since lease award / Agreement for Lease in 09/2020

research_value:
50:50 development JV between SSE Renewables and RWE since lease award / Agreement for Lease in 09/2020

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on for current structure is 27/08/2024; background history comes from project pages stating SSE and RWE signed the Agreement for Lease with The Crown Estate in September 2020 and formed an equal JV to develop North Falls. I found no credible evidence of later ownership transfers.


wind_farm_id: 6727
canonical_id: 3bc1df77-5f58-4325-b44d-0b0ba9fcd03e
wind_farm_name: North Falls
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
research_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_fact_id: 35560.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.northfallsoffshore.com/current-status/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: North Falls current status
source_of_record_url: https://www.northfallsoffshore.com/current-status/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project is beyond “Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning” because a DCO application was submitted on 26/07/2024, accepted on 22/08/2024, examined through 28/07/2025, and the consent decision was delayed to 28/04/2026. That maps most closely to the required Boundary Layer label “In Planning / Consent Application Submitted”.


wind_farm_id: 6727
canonical_id: 3bc1df77-5f58-4325-b44d-0b0ba9fcd03e
wind_farm_name: North Falls
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Approximately 1,000 MW planned
resolved_value: Approximately 1,000 MW planned
research_value: Approximately 1,000 MW planned
resolved_fact_id: 35561.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Applicant response to Written Questions (ExQ1)
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010119-000870-9.19%20Applicant%27s%20Response%20to%20Written%20Questions%20%28ExQ1%29%20%28Rev%200%29.pdf

research_summary:
Current project-specific sources now describe North Falls as approximately 1 GW / up to 1 GW, not 504 MW. The 504 MW figure belongs to the existing Greater Gabbard project and older extension-lease-stage material. Planning Inspectorate examination documents also state the NESO connection agreement is for 1,000 MW.

source_of_record_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010119-000870-9.19%20Applicant%27s%20Response%20to%20Written%20Questions%20%28ExQ1%29%20%28Rev%200%29.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6727
canonical_id: 3bc1df77-5f58-4325-b44d-0b0ba9fcd03e
wind_farm_name: North Falls
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1,000 MW
resolved_value: 1,000 MW
research_value: 1,000 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35562.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Applicant response to Written Questions (ExQ1)
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010119-000870-9.19%20Applicant%27s%20Response%20to%20Written%20Questions%20%28ExQ1%29%20%28Rev%200%29.pdf

research_summary:
No source used the label “MEC” directly, but the applicant’s response to the Examining Authority and current project materials confirm a grid connection / connection agreement capacity of 1,000 MW, which is the closest evidenced export-capacity equivalent.


wind_farm_id: 6727
canonical_id: 3bc1df77-5f58-4325-b44d-0b0ba9fcd03e
wind_farm_name: North Falls
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ES Chapter 5 Project Description
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010119-000455-3.1.7_ES%20Chapter%205%20Project%20Description.pdf

research_summary:
The DCO application keeps turbine selection within a design envelope and explicitly says wind turbine types have not been determined. No project-specific web source confirmed a chosen model.

source_of_record_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010119-000455-3.1.7_ES%20Chapter%205%20Project%20Description.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6727
canonical_id: 3bc1df77-5f58-4325-b44d-0b0ba9fcd03e
wind_farm_name: North Falls
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ES Chapter 5 Project Description
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010119-000455-3.1.7_ES%20Chapter%205%20Project%20Description.pdf

research_summary:
No project-specific source identified a selected OEM; application documents state turbine types/models are not yet determined.


wind_farm_id: 6727
canonical_id: 3bc1df77-5f58-4325-b44d-0b0ba9fcd03e
wind_farm_name: North Falls
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Applicant response to Written Questions (ExQ1)
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The applicant gave only illustrative examples based on currently available market turbines (e.g., 15 MW and 25 MW cases) and did not confirm the selected turbine rating for the project.


wind_farm_id: 6727
canonical_id: 3bc1df77-5f58-4325-b44d-0b0ba9fcd03e
wind_farm_name: North Falls
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ES Chapter 5 Project Description
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No chosen turbine is confirmed. The current DCO design envelope allows a maximum rotor diameter up to 337 m, with a smaller-envelope case of 236 m, but that is not an as-selected site-specific turbine specification.


wind_farm_id: 6727
canonical_id: 3bc1df77-5f58-4325-b44d-0b0ba9fcd03e
wind_farm_name: North Falls
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ES Chapter 5 Project Description
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No selected turbine/hub height is confirmed. The current DCO design envelope gives hub-height ranges only, from 145.4–158.4 m above MHWS for the smaller case and 195.4–209.4 m above MHWS for the larger case; these are envelope parameters, not a chosen hub height.


wind_farm_id: 6727
canonical_id: 3bc1df77-5f58-4325-b44d-0b0ba9fcd03e
wind_farm_name: North Falls
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 57
resolved_value: Up to 57
research_value: Up to 57
resolved_fact_id: 35563.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.northfallsoffshore.com/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: North Falls homepage
source_of_record_url: https://www.northfallsoffshore.com/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current web-sourced figure is up to 57 turbines from the submitted DCO scheme. This differs from the non-web validation signal of 72 because the project was redesigned after consultation: the northern array was removed and the remaining southern array reduced, so older 72-turbine figures relate to an earlier design stage.


wind_farm_id: 6727
canonical_id: 3bc1df77-5f58-4325-b44d-0b0ba9fcd03e
wind_farm_name: North Falls
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35564.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.sserenewables.com/offshore-wind/projects/north-falls/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SSE Renewables North Falls project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.sserenewables.com/offshore-wind/projects/north-falls/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Fixed foundations; exact type not confirmed; design envelope includes monopile, mono suction bucket, gravity base, or jacket

resolved_value:
Fixed foundations; exact type not confirmed; design envelope includes monopile, mono suction bucket, gravity base, or jacket

research_summary:
Project-specific sources consistently say North Falls will use fixed foundations, but final foundation type will be selected post-consent. The current assessed foundation options are monopile, mono suction bucket, gravity base structure, and jacket variants.


wind_farm_id: 6727
canonical_id: 3bc1df77-5f58-4325-b44d-0b0ba9fcd03e
wind_farm_name: North Falls
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.northfallsoffshore.com/announcements/dco-consent-decision-delayed-until-28-april-2026/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: North Falls DCO decision delay announcement
source_of_record_url: https://www.northfallsoffshore.com/announcements/dco-consent-decision-delayed-until-28-april-2026/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No development consent had been granted by 28/04/2026. Sources show the DCO decision deadline was delayed to 28/04/2026; that is a decision deadline, not a consent grant date.


wind_farm_id: 6727
canonical_id: 3bc1df77-5f58-4325-b44d-0b0ba9fcd03e
wind_farm_name: North Falls
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.northfallsoffshore.com/current-status/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: North Falls current status
source_of_record_url: https://www.northfallsoffshore.com/current-status/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No authoritative source found confirming a commissioning date. One project page says North Falls is aiming to be operational by the end of the decade, but that is not a commissioning milestone date.


wind_farm_id: 6728
canonical_id: 8065e61a-dc3f-427c-87a0-6d896faf668e
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Rampion Extension)
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DESNZ decision page
source_of_record_licence: Open Government/public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Rampion 2; also referred to in government decision materials as the Rampion 2 Offshore Wind Farm Extension Project

research_value:
Rampion 2; also referred to in government decision materials as the Rampion 2 Offshore Wind Farm Extension Project

citation_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/rampion-2-offshore-wind-farm-extension-project-development-consent-order-planning-act-2008

research_summary:
The project website uses the name Rampion 2, while DESNZ’s 04/04/2025 decision page refers to the Rampion 2 offshore wind farm extension project. This resolves the phase/name ambiguity: it is the extension project, not Rampion 1.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/rampion-2-offshore-wind-farm-extension-project-development-consent-order-planning-act-2008


wind_farm_id: 6728
canonical_id: 8065e61a-dc3f-427c-87a0-6d896faf668e
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Rampion Extension)
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35565.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://rampion2.com/about-us/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Rampion 2 About Us
source_of_record_url: https://rampion2.com/about-us/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: RWE on behalf of Rampion Extension Development Limited JV; Current owners: RWE 50.1%, Macquarie-led consortium 25.0%, Enbridge 24.9%; Operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: RWE on behalf of Rampion Extension Development Limited JV; Current owners: RWE 50.1%, Macquarie-led consortium 25.0%, Enbridge 24.9%; Operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
The official Rampion 2 owner page states the JV ownership split and that RWE is developing the project on behalf of the joint venture. The freshest dated ownership-supporting source found is RWE’s 04/04/2025 consent press release, which still describes the project as jointly owned with a Macquarie-led consortium and an Enbridge subsidiary, though without restating percentages. No newer dated official source clearly names an operator separate from developer, so operator is Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6728
canonical_id: 8065e61a-dc3f-427c-87a0-6d896faf668e
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Rampion Extension)
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://rampion2.com/about-us/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Rampion 2 About Us
source_of_record_url: https://rampion2.com/about-us/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
JV ownership evidenced as RWE 50.1%, Macquarie-led consortium 25.0%, Enbridge 24.9%; no later transfer confirmed in accessible current web sources

research_value:
JV ownership evidenced as RWE 50.1%, Macquarie-led consortium 25.0%, Enbridge 24.9%; no later transfer confirmed in accessible current web sources

research_summary:
The official project site gives the full reconciled ownership split summing to 100%. For freshness, the newest dated corroboration reviewed is RWE’s 04/04/2025 press release confirming the same partner group remains involved at consent stage. Earlier RWE material on the original Rampion project also shows the same partner structure after RWE became majority shareholder, but that is background only.


wind_farm_id: 6728
canonical_id: 8065e61a-dc3f-427c-87a0-6d896faf668e
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Rampion Extension)
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Consented
resolved_value: Consented
research_value: Consented
resolved_fact_id: 35566.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DESNZ decision page
source_of_record_licence: Open Government/public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/rampion-2-offshore-wind-farm-extension-project-development-consent-order-planning-act-2008

research_summary:
Rampion 2 was awarded development consent on 04/04/2025. That moves it beyond “In Planning / Consent Application Submitted” and into the Boundary Layer label Consented. No accessible evidence found of FID or construction start, so it is not yet “Under Construction” or “FID Taken, Pre-Construction”.


wind_farm_id: 6728
canonical_id: 8065e61a-dc3f-427c-87a0-6d896faf668e
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Rampion Extension)
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1,200 MW planned
resolved_value: 1,200 MW planned
research_value: 1,200 MW planned
resolved_fact_id: 35567.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DESNZ decision page
source_of_record_licence: Open Government/public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The clearest current authoritative figure is 1200 MW on the 04/04/2025 DESNZ decision page (“Maximum output 1200MW”). Rampion 2 project pages also consistently describe the scheme as having a maximum planned capacity of 1200 MW. This differs from the database validation context’s 400 MW; the web evidence indicates that 400 MW relates to the original Rampion project or cable rating context, not Rampion 2 gross capacity.


wind_farm_id: 6728
canonical_id: 8065e61a-dc3f-427c-87a0-6d896faf668e
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Rampion Extension)
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://rampion2.com/how-the-draft-proposals-were-developed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Rampion 2 How the draft proposals were developed
source_of_record_url: https://rampion2.com/how-the-draft-proposals-were-developed
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Publicly accessible official sources clearly confirm gross/maximum output of 1200 MW, but I did not find an equally explicit project-specific source stating a separate MEC value. Some project materials discuss 400 kV grid connection and note the original Rampion cables were rated at 400 MW, but that is not evidence of Rampion 2 MEC. To avoid conflating gross capacity with export rating, MEC remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6728
canonical_id: 8065e61a-dc3f-427c-87a0-6d896faf668e
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Rampion Extension)
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Rampion 2 ES Appendix 21.3
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010117/EN010117-000239-6.4.21.3%20Rampion%202%20ES%20Volume%204%20Appendix%2021.3%20Preliminary%20operational%20noise%20predictions.pdf

research_summary:
Project-specific documents show only a design envelope / candidate turbine assessment, not a selected final turbine. Noise appendix scenarios considered Siemens Gamesa SG DD 222 14MW and a large-turbine case derived from Vestas V236 15MW / V295 19MW assumptions, but these are modelling proxies and not a confirmed procurement decision. With no linked EuroWindWakes turbine row available, the correct output is Not confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010117/EN010117-000239-6.4.21.3%20Rampion%202%20ES%20Volume%204%20Appendix%2021.3%20Preliminary%20operational%20noise%20predictions.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6728
canonical_id: 8065e61a-dc3f-427c-87a0-6d896faf668e
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Rampion Extension)
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Rampion 2 ES Appendix 21.3
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010117/EN010117-000239-6.4.21.3%20Rampion%202%20ES%20Volume%204%20Appendix%2021.3%20Preliminary%20operational%20noise%20predictions.pdf

research_summary:
Candidate/project-assessment materials reference Siemens Gamesa, Vestas, and also note GE Haliade-X as a candidate small turbine in one noise appendix. None of these sources confirms the final selected OEM for Rampion 2, so OEM is Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6728
canonical_id: 8065e61a-dc3f-427c-87a0-6d896faf668e
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Rampion Extension)
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Rampion 2 ES Appendix 21.3
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Assessment documents consider candidate turbine scenarios around 14 MW, 15 MW, and 19 MW, but these are not the final project selection. No project-specific current source confirms the eventual installed turbine rating.


wind_farm_id: 6728
canonical_id: 8065e61a-dc3f-427c-87a0-6d896faf668e
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Rampion Extension)
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://rampion2.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Rampion-2-DCO-Draft-12-July-2021.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Rampion 2 DCO draft document
source_of_record_url: https://rampion2.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Rampion-2-DCO-Draft-12-July-2021.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The DCO/design-envelope documents cap rotor diameter at 295 m, but that is a maximum consent parameter, not a confirmed turbine specification for the chosen project build. Because no final turbine has been confirmed, rotor diameter remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6728
canonical_id: 8065e61a-dc3f-427c-87a0-6d896faf668e
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Rampion Extension)
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Rampion 2 ES Appendix 21.3
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The accessible project-specific sources reviewed provide candidate/modelling hub heights such as 124 m and 177.5 m in noise modelling, but no final selected turbine or project-specific confirmed hub height. Per the project rules, hub height cannot be inferred from generic turbine model information, so this remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6728
canonical_id: 8065e61a-dc3f-427c-87a0-6d896faf668e
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Rampion Extension)
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 90
resolved_value: Up to 90
research_value: Up to 90
resolved_fact_id: 35568.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://rampion2.com/the-project/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Rampion 2 The Project
source_of_record_url: https://rampion2.com/the-project/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The official project site and DESNZ decision materials both confirm up to 90 turbines. This aligns with the non-web validation signals provided (database winner candidate 90; EMODnet hint 90). Earlier consultation/design-envelope material had higher numbers such as 116, but the project website states the maximum number was reduced to 90 in October 2022.


wind_farm_id: 6728
canonical_id: 8065e61a-dc3f-427c-87a0-6d896faf668e
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Rampion Extension)
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile or jacket foundations
resolved_value: Monopile or jacket foundations
research_value: Monopile or jacket foundations
resolved_fact_id: 35569.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://rampion2.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Rampion-2-DCO-Draft-12-July-2021.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Rampion 2 DCO draft document
source_of_record_url: https://rampion2.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Rampion-2-DCO-Draft-12-July-2021.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The consent/design documents explicitly allow wind turbine generator foundation structures to be either monopile foundation, or jacket foundation. No more specific final foundation selection was confirmed, so the best supported project value is the consented foundation type envelope.


wind_farm_id: 6728
canonical_id: 8065e61a-dc3f-427c-87a0-6d896faf668e
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Rampion Extension)
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 04/04/2025
resolved_value: 04/04/2025
research_value: 04/04/2025
resolved_fact_id: 35570.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DESNZ decision page
source_of_record_licence: Open Government/public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
DESNZ’s published decision page gives a clear decision date of 4 April 2025, and the project website repeats that consent was awarded on the same date.


wind_farm_id: 6728
canonical_id: 8065e61a-dc3f-427c-87a0-6d896faf668e
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Rampion Extension)
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://rampion2.com/newsletter/january-2024-copy/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Rampion 2 September 2025 newsletter
source_of_record_url: https://rampion2.com/newsletter/january-2024-copy/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible official source found confirms that FID has been taken. Post-consent project communications discuss surveys, design progression and next steps, but do not state FID.


wind_farm_id: 6728
canonical_id: 8065e61a-dc3f-427c-87a0-6d896faf668e
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Rampion Extension)
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://rampion2.com/development-consent-order/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Rampion 2 DCO page
source_of_record_url: https://rampion2.com/development-consent-order/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No first-power date is available because the project is still pre-construction in the accessible sources reviewed.


wind_farm_id: 6728
canonical_id: 8065e61a-dc3f-427c-87a0-6d896faf668e
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Rampion Extension)
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://rampion2.com/examination-of-rampion-2-offshore-wind-farm-application-begins/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Rampion 2 examination article
source_of_record_url: https://rampion2.com/examination-of-rampion-2-offshore-wind-farm-application-begins/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project website has indicated expectations such as being operational before the end of the decade, but no authoritative source reviewed confirms a formal full commissioning date.


wind_farm_id: 6729
canonical_id: 53e94665-5af9-409f-a616-8b04e073efb1
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Zone 6)
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK DCO decision page
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence v3.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Rampion 2; alternative / related naming: Rampion 2 Offshore Wind Farm Extension Project; extension to the existing Rampion Offshore Wind Farm; linked historically to Crown Estate Zone 6

research_value:
Rampion 2; alternative / related naming: Rampion 2 Offshore Wind Farm Extension Project; extension to the existing Rampion Offshore Wind Farm; linked historically to Crown Estate Zone 6

research_summary:
Project-specific sources consistently describe Rampion 2 as the extension project adjacent to the existing Rampion wind farm off Sussex, while legacy Rampion materials note the wider original seabed award as Zone 6. This resolves the phase/name ambiguity: the asset researched here is the Rampion 2 extension project, not Rampion 1.


wind_farm_id: 6729
canonical_id: 53e94665-5af9-409f-a616-8b04e073efb1
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Zone 6)
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35571.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://rampion2.com/about-us/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Rampion 2 About Us
source_of_record_url: https://rampion2.com/about-us/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: RWE. Current owner / project company: Rampion Extension Development Limited. Equity partners: RWE 50.1%; Macquarie-led consortium 25.0%; Enbridge 24.9%. Operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: RWE. Current owner / project company: Rampion Extension Development Limited. Equity partners: RWE 50.1%; Macquarie-led consortium 25.0%; Enbridge 24.9%. Operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
The clearest ownership statement is on the official Rampion 2 “About us” page, which says the JV company is Rampion Extension Development Limited and gives the 50.1/25.0/24.9 split, with RWE developing the project on behalf of the JV. A newer dated RWE press release published 04/04/2025 confirms the same JV structure for the consented project. No current source explicitly identifies a distinct future operator, so that remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6729
canonical_id: 53e94665-5af9-409f-a616-8b04e073efb1
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Zone 6)
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE consent press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
JV ownership appears unchanged in current accessible sources: RWE 50.1%; Macquarie-led consortium 25.0%; Enbridge 24.9%

research_value:
JV ownership appears unchanged in current accessible sources: RWE 50.1%; Macquarie-led consortium 25.0%; Enbridge 24.9%

citation_url:
https://www.rwe.com/-/media/RWE/RWE-UK/downloads/press/2025/2025-04-03-uk-government-gives-green-light-to-rampion.pdf

research_summary:
The official Rampion 2 ownership page gives the JV split, and RWE’s dated 04/04/2025 consent announcement repeats the same percentages. I did not find newer accessible evidence of any post-consent ownership transfer, so the freshest dated source relied on is the RWE 04/04/2025 release, supported by the project site background page.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.rwe.com/-/media/RWE/RWE-UK/downloads/press/2025/2025-04-03-uk-government-gives-green-light-to-rampion.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6729
canonical_id: 53e94665-5af9-409f-a616-8b04e073efb1
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Zone 6)
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Consented
resolved_value: Consented
research_value: Consented
resolved_fact_id: 35572.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK DCO decision page
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence v3.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project received development consent on 04/04/2025. It is therefore beyond “In Planning / Consent Application Submitted” and best fits the Boundary Layer label Consented. There is no accessible evidence of FID or construction start yet.


wind_farm_id: 6729
canonical_id: 53e94665-5af9-409f-a616-8b04e073efb1
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Zone 6)
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1,200 MW planned
resolved_value: 1,200 MW planned
research_value: 1,200 MW planned
resolved_fact_id: 35573.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK DCO decision page
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence v3.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The government decision page states a maximum output of 1200 MW; project pages describe Rampion 2 as having a maximum planned / installed electrical capacity of up to 1,200 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6729
canonical_id: 53e94665-5af9-409f-a616-8b04e073efb1
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Zone 6)
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1,200 MW
resolved_value: 1,200 MW
research_value: 1,200 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35574.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK DCO decision page
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence v3.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
An accessible government decision page gives “Maximum output 1200MW”, and project application documents describe the authorised offshore generating station as having electrical export capacity/output up to 1,200 MW. No separate lower MEC figure was confirmed in accessible sources, so 1,200 MW is the best-supported export/output figure.


wind_farm_id: 6729
canonical_id: 53e94665-5af9-409f-a616-8b04e073efb1
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Zone 6)
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Planning Inspectorate scoping report PDF
source_of_record_licence: public planning document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010117/EN010117-000006-EN010117%20-%20Scoping%20Report.pdf

research_summary:
No project-specific accessible source names a selected turbine model. Rampion 2 documents explicitly indicate turbine choice will be determined later / within a design envelope, so a site-specific model should not be inferred. No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided in the prompt, so the required fallback is unavailable.

source_of_record_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010117/EN010117-000006-EN010117%20-%20Scoping%20Report.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6729
canonical_id: 53e94665-5af9-409f-a616-8b04e073efb1
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Zone 6)
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Planning Inspectorate scoping report PDF
source_of_record_licence: public planning document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010117/EN010117-000006-EN010117%20-%20Scoping%20Report.pdf

research_summary:
No accessible project-specific source confirms a chosen OEM for Rampion 2. The project remains within a consented design envelope and turbine procurement has not been publicly confirmed in the sources reviewed.


wind_farm_id: 6729
canonical_id: 53e94665-5af9-409f-a616-8b04e073efb1
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Zone 6)
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Rampion 2 PEIR Chapter 4 PDF
source_of_record_licence: public planning document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://rampion2.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Rampion-2-PEIR-Volume-2-Chapter-4-The-Proposed-Development.pdf

research_summary:
No project-specific source confirms a selected turbine rating. Early design-envelope documents discuss alternative turbine scenarios only; these are not as-built or procured turbine selections and should not be treated as confirmed site specs.

source_of_record_url:
https://rampion2.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Rampion-2-PEIR-Volume-2-Chapter-4-The-Proposed-Development.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6729
canonical_id: 53e94665-5af9-409f-a616-8b04e073efb1
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Zone 6)
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Rampion 2 PEIR Chapter 4 PDF
source_of_record_licence: public planning document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://rampion2.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Rampion-2-PEIR-Volume-2-Chapter-4-The-Proposed-Development.pdf

research_summary:
The project’s PEIR assessed alternative turbine envelopes including rotor diameters up to 295 m, but no selected site-specific turbine has been confirmed post-consent. Under the user’s rules, that means rotor diameter remains Not confirmed rather than inferred from the envelope.


wind_farm_id: 6729
canonical_id: 53e94665-5af9-409f-a616-8b04e073efb1
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Zone 6)
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://rampion2.com/the-project/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Rampion 2 project page
source_of_record_url: https://rampion2.com/the-project/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible project-specific source confirms a selected hub height for Rampion 2. The public materials emphasise maximum blade-tip height and design-envelope flexibility, not a final turbine tower / hub height. No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided, so fallback was not available.


wind_farm_id: 6729
canonical_id: 53e94665-5af9-409f-a616-8b04e073efb1
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Zone 6)
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 90
resolved_value: Up to 90
research_value: Up to 90
resolved_fact_id: 35575.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://rampion2.com/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Rampion 2 home page
source_of_record_url: https://rampion2.com/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Post-consent official sources consistently state the DCO permits up to 90 turbines. This differs from the non-web database validation signal of 0 and likely reflects dataset lag versus the now-consented project. It also reflects a later design change from earlier consultation-stage figures of up to 116 turbines.


wind_farm_id: 6729
canonical_id: 53e94665-5af9-409f-a616-8b04e073efb1
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Zone 6)
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile or jacket foundations permitted; final type not confirmed
resolved_value: Monopile or jacket foundations permitted; final type not confirmed
research_value: Monopile or jacket foundations permitted; final type not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 35576.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://rampion2.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Rampion-2-DCO-Draft-12-July-2021.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Draft DCO PDF
source_of_record_url: https://rampion2.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Rampion-2-DCO-Draft-12-July-2021.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public planning document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The consent / application materials do not show a single final selected foundation type. Instead, they explicitly allow either monopile or jacket foundations, including jacket options with pin piles or suction buckets. Therefore the confirmed answer is the permitted foundation envelope, not a final selected type.


wind_farm_id: 6729
canonical_id: 53e94665-5af9-409f-a616-8b04e073efb1
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Zone 6)
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 04/04/2025
resolved_value: 04/04/2025
research_value: 04/04/2025
resolved_fact_id: 35577.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK DCO decision page
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence v3.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Multiple official sources confirm the Secretary of State granted development consent on 4 April 2025.


wind_farm_id: 6729
canonical_id: 53e94665-5af9-409f-a616-8b04e073efb1
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Zone 6)
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://rampion2.com/the-project/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Rampion 2 project page
source_of_record_url: https://rampion2.com/the-project/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I did not find an accessible authoritative source stating FID has been taken. Current sources discuss consent and indicative construction timing only.


wind_farm_id: 6729
canonical_id: 53e94665-5af9-409f-a616-8b04e073efb1
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Zone 6)
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://rampion2.com/the-project/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Rampion 2 project page
source_of_record_url: https://rampion2.com/the-project/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No authoritative source confirms first power. The project is not yet under construction in the sources reviewed.


wind_farm_id: 6729
canonical_id: 53e94665-5af9-409f-a616-8b04e073efb1
wind_farm_name: Rampion 2 (Zone 6)
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://rampion2.com/newsletter/january-2024/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Rampion 2 January 2024 newsletter
source_of_record_url: https://rampion2.com/newsletter/january-2024/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Sources only provide indicative timing such as “before the end of the decade” / “2029 to 2030”; no final commissioning date has been confirmed, so this remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6730
canonical_id: 38d9dc95-7fd1-4cc4-83db-7eed3be0647b
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 1 (Dogger Bank South West)
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE press release 19/01/2023
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Dogger Bank South West (DBS West); alternative/historic reference: R4 Project 1 (Dogger Bank South West)

research_value:
Dogger Bank South West (DBS West); alternative/historic reference: R4 Project 1 (Dogger Bank South West)

citation_url:
https://uk.rwe.com/press-and-news/2023-01-19-rwe-secures-lease-agreements-to-develop-dogger-bank-south-offshore-wind-farm-sit/

research_summary:
RWE’s current project page and its live 19/01/2023 press release confirm the two project names DBS East and DBS West under Dogger Bank South. The Round 4 lease context aligns DBS West with the western Dogger Bank South lease site.

source_of_record_url:
https://uk.rwe.com/press-and-news/2023-01-19-rwe-secures-lease-agreements-to-develop-dogger-bank-south-offshore-wind-farm-sit/


wind_farm_id: 6730
canonical_id: 38d9dc95-7fd1-4cc4-83db-7eed3be0647b
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 1 (Dogger Bank South West)
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Developer: RWE. Current owners: RWE 51%, Masdar 49%. Operator: RWE
resolved_value: Developer: RWE. Current owners: RWE 51%, Masdar 49%. Operator: RWE
research_value: Developer: RWE. Current owners: RWE 51%, Masdar 49%. Operator: RWE
resolved_fact_id: 35578.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE and Masdar join forces press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.rwe.com/-/media/RWE/documents/07-presse/rwe-ag/2024/2024-02-29-rwe-and-masdar-join-forces-to-develop-3-gw-offshore-in-uk.pdf

research_summary:
Freshest ownership source used: RWE project page last crawled 2026 and reflecting July 2025 status, plus RWE dated 29/02/2024 transaction close. These confirm Masdar acquired 49% and RWE leads development, construction and operation on behalf of the JV.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.rwe.com/-/media/RWE/documents/07-presse/rwe-ag/2024/2024-02-29-rwe-and-masdar-join-forces-to-develop-3-gw-offshore-in-uk.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6730
canonical_id: 38d9dc95-7fd1-4cc4-83db-7eed3be0647b
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 1 (Dogger Bank South West)
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Initially 100% RWE; from 29/02/2024 JV ownership became RWE 51% / Masdar 49%
research_value: Initially 100% RWE; from 29/02/2024 JV ownership became RWE 51% / Masdar 49%
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE and Masdar join forces press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.rwe.com/-/media/RWE/documents/07-presse/rwe-ag/2024/2024-02-29-rwe-and-masdar-join-forces-to-develop-3-gw-offshore-in-uk.pdf

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on: 14/07/2025 RWE update confirms the JV remains RWE+Masdar, while the dated 29/02/2024 release confirms the ownership split and closing. Earlier 19/01/2023 RWE lease release shows RWE alone held the lease agreements before Masdar joined.


wind_farm_id: 6730
canonical_id: 38d9dc95-7fd1-4cc4-83db-7eed3be0647b
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 1 (Dogger Bank South West)
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
research_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_fact_id: 35579.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://doggerbanksouth.co.uk/current-status/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DBS current status page
source_of_record_url: https://doggerbanksouth.co.uk/current-status/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project has progressed beyond lease-award stage. RWE states the DCO application was accepted in July 2024, examination closed 11/07/2025, and the project is now in recommendation/decision stages awaiting consent. Therefore the closest exact Boundary Layer label is In Planning / Consent Application Submitted, not lease-awarded pre-planning.


wind_farm_id: 6730
canonical_id: 38d9dc95-7fd1-4cc4-83db-7eed3be0647b
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 1 (Dogger Bank South West)
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1500 MW
resolved_value: 1500 MW
research_value: 1500 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35580.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE press release 19/01/2023
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://uk.rwe.com/press-and-news/2023-01-19-rwe-secures-lease-agreements-to-develop-dogger-bank-south-offshore-wind-farm-sit/

research_summary:
Multiple official sources describe DBS as two separate sites of 1.5 GW each. This matches the database context value for DBS West.


wind_farm_id: 6730
canonical_id: 38d9dc95-7fd1-4cc4-83db-7eed3be0647b
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 1 (Dogger Bank South West)
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank South Non-Technical Summary
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010125-000434-7.0%20ES%20Non-Technical%20Summary.pdf

research_summary:
Publicly accessible official sources reviewed clearly confirm installed/planned generation capacity, but no openly accessible project-specific source found a distinct MEC figure for DBS West. The available application summaries discuss export cables and HVDC infrastructure but do not provide a clearly stated MEC value for this phase in the accessible pages reviewed.

source_of_record_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010125-000434-7.0%20ES%20Non-Technical%20Summary.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6730
canonical_id: 38d9dc95-7fd1-4cc4-83db-7eed3be0647b
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 1 (Dogger Bank South West)
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank South Non-Technical Summary
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010125-000434-7.0%20ES%20Non-Technical%20Summary.pdf

research_summary:
Project-specific sources only state that a range of turbine sizes is under consideration; no project-specific model has been confirmed for DBS West. No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided in the prompt, so the required output is Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6730
canonical_id: 38d9dc95-7fd1-4cc4-83db-7eed3be0647b
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 1 (Dogger Bank South West)
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank South Non-Technical Summary
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific official source reviewed names a turbine supplier for DBS West. The application documents remain technology-flexible at this stage.


wind_farm_id: 6730
canonical_id: 38d9dc95-7fd1-4cc4-83db-7eed3be0647b
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 1 (Dogger Bank South West)
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank South Non-Technical Summary
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The examination-stage documents indicate turbine sizes remain under consideration. No project-specific rated turbine size has been fixed publicly for DBS West.


wind_farm_id: 6730
canonical_id: 38d9dc95-7fd1-4cc4-83db-7eed3be0647b
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 1 (Dogger Bank South West)
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank South Non-Technical Summary
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The DCO material gives a maximum rotor blade diameter of 344 m as a design envelope, not a confirmed as-planned turbine specification for DBS West. Per instruction, this is not treated as a confirmed site-specific rotor diameter.


wind_farm_id: 6730
canonical_id: 38d9dc95-7fd1-4cc4-83db-7eed3be0647b
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 1 (Dogger Bank South West)
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank South Non-Technical Summary
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific source reviewed states a confirmed hub height for DBS West. The DCO material provides only envelope parameters such as tip height and blade clearance; hub height cannot be inferred from those values.


wind_farm_id: 6730
canonical_id: 38d9dc95-7fd1-4cc4-83db-7eed3be0647b
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 1 (Dogger Bank South West)
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 8878.0
resolved_source_type: emodnet
resolved_source_name: EMODnet Human Activities
resolved_source_detail: EMODnet Jan 2026
citation_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMODnet Human Activities
source_of_record_type: public data portal
source_of_record_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
source_of_record_licence: Free and open public portal
research_source_name: Dogger Bank South Non-Technical Summary
research_source_type: planning document
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Official examination documents state up to 100 wind turbines at DBS West, but this is an application envelope rather than a final confirmed count. This differs from the database validation signal of 0, which likely reflects pre-build dataset handling rather than a developed turbine layout. A final turbine count has not been confirmed publicly.


wind_farm_id: 6730
canonical_id: 38d9dc95-7fd1-4cc4-83db-7eed3be0647b
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 1 (Dogger Bank South West)
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank South Non-Technical Summary
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The examination documents state that a range of turbine sizes and associated foundations is under consideration, but no final foundation type for DBS West has been confirmed publicly.


wind_farm_id: 6730
canonical_id: 38d9dc95-7fd1-4cc4-83db-7eed3be0647b
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 1 (Dogger Bank South West)
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://doggerbanksouth.co.uk/current-status/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DBS current status page
source_of_record_url: https://doggerbanksouth.co.uk/current-status/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
As of the latest reviewed official sources, DBS West has completed examination but has not yet received development consent. Therefore no consent date can be recorded.


wind_farm_id: 6730
canonical_id: 38d9dc95-7fd1-4cc4-83db-7eed3be0647b
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 1 (Dogger Bank South West)
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE AR7 press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.rwe.com/-/media/RWE/documents/07-presse/rwe-ag/2026/2026-01-14-rwe-secures-contracts-for-difference-for-6-9-gigawatts-of-offshore-wind-capacity.pdf

research_summary:
No official source reviewed states that FID has been taken for DBS West. RWE’s January 2026 update instead places the project at CfD-award stage and gives expected commissioning dates.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.rwe.com/-/media/RWE/documents/07-presse/rwe-ag/2026/2026-01-14-rwe-secures-contracts-for-difference-for-6-9-gigawatts-of-offshore-wind-capacity.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6730
canonical_id: 38d9dc95-7fd1-4cc4-83db-7eed3be0647b
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 1 (Dogger Bank South West)
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/01/2031
resolved_value: 01/01/2031
research_value: 01/01/2031
resolved_fact_id: 35581.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE AR7 press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
RWE’s dated 14/01/2026 press release states “Commissioning ... is expected in 2031 (DBS West)”. As only the year is given, this is normalized to 01/01/2031 per instructions.


wind_farm_id: 6731
canonical_id: 316ab4ed-8807-4b1f-843f-d2c2a50c04b2
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 2 (Dogger Bank South East)
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Dogger Bank South East (DBS East)
research_value: Dogger Bank South East (DBS East)
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE press release 19/01/2023
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.rwe.com/en/press/rwe-renewables/2023-01-19-rwe-secures-lease-agreements-to-develop-dogger-bank-south-offshore-wind-farm-sit/

research_summary:
RWE’s current project pages define Dogger Bank South as two separate sites, DBS East and DBS West. RWE’s 19/01/2023 lease-announcement explicitly says DBS is made up of two 1.5 GW sites known as DBS East and DBS West.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.rwe.com/en/press/rwe-renewables/2023-01-19-rwe-secures-lease-agreements-to-develop-dogger-bank-south-offshore-wind-farm-sit/


wind_farm_id: 6731
canonical_id: 316ab4ed-8807-4b1f-843f-d2c2a50c04b2
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 2 (Dogger Bank South East)
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Developer: RWE; Current owners: RWE 51%, Masdar 49%; Operator: RWE
resolved_value: Developer: RWE; Current owners: RWE 51%, Masdar 49%; Operator: RWE
research_value: Developer: RWE; Current owners: RWE 51%, Masdar 49%; Operator: RWE
resolved_fact_id: 35612.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://uk.rwe.com/project-proposals/dogger-bank-south/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE Dogger Bank South project page
source_of_record_url: https://uk.rwe.com/project-proposals/dogger-bank-south/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Freshest ownership source used: RWE project page crawled last week and dated RWE release 29/02/2024. Both state Masdar holds 49% and RWE 51%; RWE leads development, construction and operation.


wind_farm_id: 6731
canonical_id: 316ab4ed-8807-4b1f-843f-d2c2a50c04b2
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 2 (Dogger Bank South East)
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE press release 29/02/2024
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
19/01/2023: RWE secured Crown Estate lease rights for DBS East and DBS West; 01/12/2023: Masdar announced acquisition of 49% stake; 29/02/2024: transaction closed, ownership set at RWE 51% / Masdar 49%

research_value:
19/01/2023: RWE secured Crown Estate lease rights for DBS East and DBS West; 01/12/2023: Masdar announced acquisition of 49% stake; 29/02/2024: transaction closed, ownership set at RWE 51% / Masdar 49%

citation_url:
https://www.rwe.com/en/investor-relations/financial-calendar-and-publications/news-and-ad-hoc-announcements/news/news-2024-02-29/

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on for current structure: 29/02/2024. RWE’s dated releases show the progression from sole leaseholder/developer to the current JV.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.rwe.com/en/investor-relations/financial-calendar-and-publications/news-and-ad-hoc-announcements/news/news-2024-02-29/


wind_farm_id: 6731
canonical_id: 316ab4ed-8807-4b1f-843f-d2c2a50c04b2
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 2 (Dogger Bank South East)
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
research_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_fact_id: 35613.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://uk.rwe.com/project-proposals/dogger-bank-south/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE Dogger Bank South project page
source_of_record_url: https://uk.rwe.com/project-proposals/dogger-bank-south/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Phase ambiguity is resolved as DBS East, one of the two DBS sites. RWE states the DCO application was accepted by the Planning Inspectorate in July 2024 and that a consent decision was still anticipated later, so it is beyond pre-planning but not yet consented.


wind_farm_id: 6731
canonical_id: 316ab4ed-8807-4b1f-843f-d2c2a50c04b2
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 2 (Dogger Bank South East)
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1500 MW
resolved_value: 1500 MW
research_value: 1500 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35614.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE press release 19/01/2023
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.rwe.com/en/press/rwe-renewables/2023-01-19-rwe-secures-lease-agreements-to-develop-dogger-bank-south-offshore-wind-farm-sit/

research_summary:
RWE’s 19/01/2023 release says each project could have an installed capacity of up to 1.5 GW. DESNZ AR7 results published in 2026 also list Dogger Bank South East CfD Unit A – 1500.00 MW, corroborating the phase-level value.


wind_farm_id: 6731
canonical_id: 316ab4ed-8807-4b1f-843f-d2c2a50c04b2
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 2 (Dogger Bank South East)
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DBS Non-Technical Summary June 2024
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://doggerbanksouth.co.uk/assets/images/pdf/Dogger-Bank-South-Non-Technical-Summary-June-2024.pdf

research_summary:
Publicly accessible project pages and the June 2024 Non-Technical Summary confirm the HVDC transmission concept and project scale, but I did not find an openly accessible source that explicitly states a phase-specific MEC for DBS East. I therefore leave MEC as Not confirmed rather than infer it from installed capacity.

source_of_record_url:
https://doggerbanksouth.co.uk/assets/images/pdf/Dogger-Bank-South-Non-Technical-Summary-June-2024.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6731
canonical_id: 316ab4ed-8807-4b1f-843f-d2c2a50c04b2
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 2 (Dogger Bank South East)
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://doggerbanksouth.co.uk/about/components-of-dbs/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DBS components page
source_of_record_url: https://doggerbanksouth.co.uk/about/components-of-dbs/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific sources only describe DBS East/West as up to 100 turbines each with a maximum rotor diameter of 344 m and maximum blade tip height; no named turbine model is tied to DBS East. Per instruction, no inference is made from generic OEM platforms.


wind_farm_id: 6731
canonical_id: 316ab4ed-8807-4b1f-843f-d2c2a50c04b2
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 2 (Dogger Bank South East)
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://uk.rwe.com/project-proposals/dogger-bank-south/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE Dogger Bank South project page
source_of_record_url: https://uk.rwe.com/project-proposals/dogger-bank-south/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific accessible source found that names an OEM for DBS East. The public material remains at envelope/design-parameter level only.


wind_farm_id: 6731
canonical_id: 316ab4ed-8807-4b1f-843f-d2c2a50c04b2
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 2 (Dogger Bank South East)
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DBS Non-Technical Summary June 2024
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://doggerbanksouth.co.uk/assets/images/pdf/Dogger-Bank-South-Non-Technical-Summary-June-2024.pdf

research_summary:
No project-specific accessible source found that states the selected turbine rating for DBS East. Public sources only indicate a maximum of 100 turbines for the 1.5 GW phase and note that fewer turbines could be used if larger units are chosen.


wind_farm_id: 6731
canonical_id: 316ab4ed-8807-4b1f-843f-d2c2a50c04b2
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 2 (Dogger Bank South East)
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 344 m (maximum proposed)
resolved_value: 344 m (maximum proposed)
research_value: 344 m (maximum proposed)
resolved_fact_id: 35615.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DBS Non-Technical Summary June 2024
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project-specific DBS pages state each turbine would have a rotor diameter of 344 m; the June 2024 NTS gives the same figure as Max rotor blade diameter: 344m. This is a proposed envelope value, not an as-selected turbine spec.


wind_farm_id: 6731
canonical_id: 316ab4ed-8807-4b1f-843f-d2c2a50c04b2
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 2 (Dogger Bank South East)
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://doggerbanksouth.co.uk/about/components-of-dbs/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DBS components page
source_of_record_url: https://doggerbanksouth.co.uk/about/components-of-dbs/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific source located an explicit hub height for DBS East. The published material gives maximum tip height and minimum blade clearance, but not hub height; I therefore do not derive hub height arithmetically.


wind_farm_id: 6731
canonical_id: 316ab4ed-8807-4b1f-843f-d2c2a50c04b2
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 2 (Dogger Bank South East)
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 100
resolved_value: Up to 100
research_value: Up to 100
resolved_fact_id: 35616.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://doggerbanksouth.co.uk/about/components-of-dbs/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DBS components page
source_of_record_url: https://doggerbanksouth.co.uk/about/components-of-dbs/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific sources state DBS East and DBS West each hosting 100 turbines, with up to 200 turbines combined. This differs from the non-web validation signal of 0 because the project is still pre-build/planning-stage; 0 reflects installed/observed turbines, while web sources describe the planned maximum.


wind_farm_id: 6731
canonical_id: 316ab4ed-8807-4b1f-843f-d2c2a50c04b2
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 2 (Dogger Bank South East)
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile or pin-pile jacket
resolved_value: Monopile or pin-pile jacket
research_value: Monopile or pin-pile jacket
resolved_fact_id: 35617.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DBS Non-Technical Summary June 2024
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The June 2024 NTS shows project-specific foundation examples and states a range of different turbine sizes and associated foundations are under consideration. Accessible project material supports the foundation type as an options envelope rather than a final selected design.


wind_farm_id: 6731
canonical_id: 316ab4ed-8807-4b1f-843f-d2c2a50c04b2
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 2 (Dogger Bank South East)
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://doggerbanksouth.co.uk/latest-news/08-01-2026/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DBS latest news 08/01/2026
source_of_record_url: https://doggerbanksouth.co.uk/latest-news/08-01-2026/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
As of the latest accessible project updates reviewed, DBS East had entered examination but no DCO consent grant date was confirmed. The project website later reported a decision delay to 30/04/2026, which still indicates consent had not yet been issued on that update.


wind_farm_id: 6731
canonical_id: 316ab4ed-8807-4b1f-843f-d2c2a50c04b2
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 2 (Dogger Bank South East)
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE news 14/01/2026
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible authoritative source located a project-specific FID for DBS East. AR7 CfD success in January 2026 is an important commercial milestone, but it is not itself stated as FID.


wind_farm_id: 6731
canonical_id: 316ab4ed-8807-4b1f-843f-d2c2a50c04b2
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 2 (Dogger Bank South East)
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DESNZ AR7 results
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence v3.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible authoritative source found a first power date for DBS East. The repaired government AR7 results page is available again and lists 2030/31 as the Delivery Year - Phase 1, but that is not a first-power date.


wind_farm_id: 6731
canonical_id: 316ab4ed-8807-4b1f-843f-d2c2a50c04b2
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 2 (Dogger Bank South East)
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DESNZ AR7 results
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence v3.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible authoritative source found a commissioning date for DBS East. The repaired DESNZ AR7 results page lists 2030/31 delivery year for the CfD unit, but that is not the same as a confirmed full commissioning date.


wind_farm_id: 6732
canonical_id: c513260e-2d78-4860-8cd5-cd6848344082
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 3 (Outer Dowsing)
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Outer Dowsing Offshore Wind; alternative reference: R4 Project 3 (Outer Dowsing)
research_value: Outer Dowsing Offshore Wind; alternative reference: R4 Project 3 (Outer Dowsing)
citation_url: https://www.outerdowsing.com/about/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Outer Dowsing project about page
source_of_record_url: https://www.outerdowsing.com/about/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official project branding uses Outer Dowsing Offshore Wind. The Crown Estate Round 4 project is commonly referred to as Outer Dowsing and matches the database row context.


wind_farm_id: 6732
canonical_id: c513260e-2d78-4860-8cd5-cd6848344082
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 3 (Outer Dowsing)
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35618.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Gulf ownership announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: TotalEnergies, Corio Generation and affiliates, Gulf Development; current equity owners confirmed as TotalEnergies 50%, Green Investment Group/Macquarie affiliate 25.01%, Gulf Energy Development 24.99%; operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: TotalEnergies, Corio Generation and affiliates, Gulf Development; current equity owners confirmed as TotalEnergies 50%, Green Investment Group/Macquarie affiliate 25.01%, Gulf Energy Development 24.99%; operator: Not confirmed

citation_url:
https://www.gulf.co.th/en/newsroom/news-and-activities/191/gulf-invests-in-a-1500-megawatt-outer-dowsing-offshore-wind-project-in-the-united-kingdom

research_summary:
Freshest dated ownership evidence found is TotalEnergies 2025 universal registration document published April 2026, which states the project is in joint venture with Macquarie and Gulf Energy Development; this aligns with Gulf’s 03/03/2023 announcement giving a reconciled split of 50% / 25.01% / 24.99%. A distinct current operator was not confirmed from accessible project-specific sources.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.gulf.co.th/en/newsroom/news-and-activities/191/gulf-invests-in-a-1500-megawatt-outer-dowsing-offshore-wind-project-in-the-united-kingdom


wind_farm_id: 6732
canonical_id: c513260e-2d78-4860-8cd5-cd6848344082
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 3 (Outer Dowsing)
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Gulf ownership announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Initially developed jointly by TotalEnergies and Corio/Green Investment Group; Gulf acquired 24.99% in 03/2023 from Corio’s initial stake, leaving TotalEnergies 50%, GIG/Macquarie 25.01%, Gulf 24.99%

research_value:
Initially developed jointly by TotalEnergies and Corio/Green Investment Group; Gulf acquired 24.99% in 03/2023 from Corio’s initial stake, leaving TotalEnergies 50%, GIG/Macquarie 25.01%, Gulf 24.99%

citation_url:
https://www.gulf.co.th/en/newsroom/news-and-activities/191/gulf-invests-in-a-1500-megawatt-outer-dowsing-offshore-wind-project-in-the-united-kingdom

research_summary:
Outer Dowsing’s 19/01/2023 lease announcement still described the project as jointly developed by TotalEnergies and Corio Generation. Gulf’s 03/03/2023 dated announcement records its entry and the resulting percentages. Freshest corroboration is the April 2026 TotalEnergies filing confirming the JV with Macquarie and Gulf.


wind_farm_id: 6732
canonical_id: c513260e-2d78-4860-8cd5-cd6848344082
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 3 (Outer Dowsing)
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Consented
resolved_value: Consented
research_value: Consented
resolved_fact_id: 35619.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DESNZ DCO decision page
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/outer-dowsing-offshore-wind-farm-development-consent-order-planning-act-2008

research_summary:
The project submitted its DCO application on 19/03/2024, it was accepted on 16/04/2024, and development consent was granted on 10/02/2026. It is therefore best classified as Consented rather than pre-planning or construction.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/outer-dowsing-offshore-wind-farm-development-consent-order-planning-act-2008


wind_farm_id: 6732
canonical_id: c513260e-2d78-4860-8cd5-cd6848344082
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 3 (Outer Dowsing)
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1500 MW
resolved_value: 1500 MW
research_value: 1500 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35620.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DESNZ DCO decision page
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/outer-dowsing-offshore-wind-farm-development-consent-order-planning-act-2008

research_summary:
Multiple project and government sources consistently describe Outer Dowsing as a 1.5 GW / 1500 MW offshore wind farm.


wind_farm_id: 6732
canonical_id: c513260e-2d78-4860-8cd5-cd6848344082
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 3 (Outer Dowsing)
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DESNZ DCO decision page
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Accessible sources clearly confirm generating capacity up to 1.5 GW, but an explicit project-specific MEC/export capacity figure was not found in openly accessible authoritative sources reviewed. To avoid conflating installed capacity with MEC, this is left Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6732
canonical_id: c513260e-2d78-4860-8cd5-cd6848344082
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 3 (Outer Dowsing)
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.outerdowsing.com/about/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Outer Dowsing project about page
source_of_record_url: https://www.outerdowsing.com/about/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific authoritative source reviewed names a selected turbine model. The project remains consented rather than under construction, and no linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided in context, so the field remains Not confirmed rather than inferred.


wind_farm_id: 6732
canonical_id: c513260e-2d78-4860-8cd5-cd6848344082
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 3 (Outer Dowsing)
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.outerdowsing.com/about/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Outer Dowsing project about page
source_of_record_url: https://www.outerdowsing.com/about/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible official project, owner, OEM, or regulator source reviewed confirms a turbine supplier for this specific project.


wind_farm_id: 6732
canonical_id: c513260e-2d78-4860-8cd5-cd6848344082
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 3 (Outer Dowsing)
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.outerdowsing.com/what-is-offshore-wind/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Outer Dowsing What is offshore wind page
source_of_record_url: https://www.outerdowsing.com/what-is-offshore-wind/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project documentation viewed gives envelope values such as turbine count and maximum tip height, but no final project-specific selected turbine rating was confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6732
canonical_id: c513260e-2d78-4860-8cd5-cd6848344082
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 3 (Outer Dowsing)
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Outer Dowsing marine/intertidal archaeology PDF excerpt
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.outerdowsing.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/6.1.13_Marine-and-Intertidal-Archaeology.pdf

research_summary:
A project PDF visible through the web results indicates a maximum rotor diameter of 340 m within the design envelope, but this is not a selected as-built turbine specification and no final turbine model is confirmed; to avoid treating design-envelope maxima as actual turbine specs, this remains Not confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.outerdowsing.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/6.1.13_Marine-and-Intertidal-Archaeology.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6732
canonical_id: c513260e-2d78-4860-8cd5-cd6848344082
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 3 (Outer Dowsing)
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.outerdowsing.com/about/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Outer Dowsing project about page
source_of_record_url: https://www.outerdowsing.com/about/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific web source reviewed explicitly confirms hub height for Outer Dowsing, and there is no linked EuroWindWakes fallback in the supplied context.


wind_farm_id: 6732
canonical_id: c513260e-2d78-4860-8cd5-cd6848344082
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 3 (Outer Dowsing)
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 100 turbines consented
resolved_value: Up to 100 turbines consented
research_value: Up to 100 turbines consented
resolved_fact_id: 35621.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DESNZ DCO decision page
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Government decision pages state the DCO covers up to 100 wind turbine generators. Earlier project PEIR excerpts referenced up to 93 WTGs as a design scenario, so the consented cap of 100 is the strongest current value. This differs from the non-web validation signal of 0, likely because the dataset hint reflects non-operational/as-built count rather than consented project allowance.


wind_farm_id: 6732
canonical_id: c513260e-2d78-4860-8cd5-cd6848344082
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 3 (Outer Dowsing)
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Outer Dowsing underwater noise assessment PDF excerpt
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010130/EN010130-002118-6.3.11.2%20Chapter%2011%20Appendix%202%20Underwater%20Noise%20Assessment%20V2%20Tracked_575394_1.pdf

research_summary:
One project environmental PDF excerpt references jacket foundation in a modelling context and another excerpt references 25/30MW WTG (GBS) in a maximum design scenario. Because these are design-envelope scenarios rather than a confirmed final selected foundation solution, the project-specific foundation type is left Not confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010130/EN010130-002118-6.3.11.2%20Chapter%2011%20Appendix%202%20Underwater%20Noise%20Assessment%20V2%20Tracked_575394_1.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6732
canonical_id: c513260e-2d78-4860-8cd5-cd6848344082
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 3 (Outer Dowsing)
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Outer Dowsing consent announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.outerdowsing.com/news/uk-government-grants-consent-to-outer-dowsing-offshore-wind-farm-in-the-southern-north-sea/

research_summary:
No authoritative accessible source reviewed confirms that FID has been taken. Post-consent project communications say the team will continue working toward commencement of construction, which suggests FID is still unconfirmed publicly.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.outerdowsing.com/news/uk-government-grants-consent-to-outer-dowsing-offshore-wind-farm-in-the-southern-north-sea/


wind_farm_id: 6732
canonical_id: c513260e-2d78-4860-8cd5-cd6848344082
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 3 (Outer Dowsing)
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Gulf ownership announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No authoritative source reviewed gives a firm commissioning date. Gulf’s dated 03/03/2023 statement said commercial operation was expected in late 2029, but this is an expectation rather than a confirmed commissioning milestone, so the table value remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6733
canonical_id: adb534ae-db95-47e2-8954-c87b486b97ed
wind_farm_name: Mona
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Mona Offshore Wind Project
research_value: Mona Offshore Wind Project
citation_url: https://www.jnbp.com/project/mona/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: JERA Nex bp project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.jnbp.com/project/mona/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official current name is Mona Offshore Wind Project / Mona Offshore Wind Farm. It was announced by bp and EnBW in 2021 as one of the Round 4 Irish Sea projects and remains referred to simply as “Mona” on the current project and owner pages.


wind_farm_id: 6733
canonical_id: adb534ae-db95-47e2-8954-c87b486b97ed
wind_farm_name: Mona
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 36170.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: JERA Nex bp acquisition announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: JERA Nex bp (originally developed by bp and EnBW through Mona Offshore Wind Ltd); Current owner: JERA Nex bp; Operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: JERA Nex bp (originally developed by bp and EnBW through Mona Offshore Wind Ltd); Current owner: JERA Nex bp; Operator: Not confirmed

citation_url:
https://www.jnbp.com/ja/jera-nex-bp-acquires-enbws-stake-in-mona-offshore-wind-farm-signs-lease-agreement-with-the-crown-estate/

research_summary:
Freshest ownership evidence is 16/01/2026: JERA Nex bp announced it is acquiring EnBW’s stake and will move forward with Mona; EnBW simultaneously said it is selling its stake to JERA Nex bp. Earlier project materials show Mona Offshore Wind Ltd as the bp/EnBW JV developer. No separate current operator was clearly stated in accessible authoritative sources.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.jnbp.com/ja/jera-nex-bp-acquires-enbws-stake-in-mona-offshore-wind-farm-signs-lease-agreement-with-the-crown-estate/


wind_farm_id: 6733
canonical_id: adb534ae-db95-47e2-8954-c87b486b97ed
wind_farm_name: Mona
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: 2021-15/01/2026: bp/EnBW development partnership; from 16/01/2026: JERA Nex bp 100%
research_value: 2021-15/01/2026: bp/EnBW development partnership; from 16/01/2026: JERA Nex bp 100%
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: JERA Nex bp acquisition announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.jnbp.com/ja/jera-nex-bp-acquires-enbws-stake-in-mona-offshore-wind-farm-signs-lease-agreement-with-the-crown-estate/

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on is 16/01/2026. Early project pages and consultation material identify Mona as a joint venture of bp and EnBW. The 2026 JERA Nex bp and EnBW statements indicate EnBW’s stake transfer to JERA Nex bp, implying consolidated ownership under JERA Nex bp after that transaction. Publicly accessible authoritative pages reviewed did not provide a more granular post-transfer equity split beneath JERA Nex bp itself for the project asset.


wind_farm_id: 6733
canonical_id: adb534ae-db95-47e2-8954-c87b486b97ed
wind_farm_name: Mona
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Consented
resolved_value: Consented
research_value: Consented
resolved_fact_id: 36171.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/mona-offshore-wind-farm-development-consent-decision-announced
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK decision announcement
source_of_record_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/mona-offshore-wind-farm-development-consent-decision-announced
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project received development consent on 04/07/2025 and later a marine licence in 09/2025. JERA Nex bp’s 16/01/2026 statement says the project is moving toward FID, so it is not yet under construction and no FID is evidenced. The closest exact Boundary Layer label is therefore Consented.


wind_farm_id: 6733
canonical_id: adb534ae-db95-47e2-8954-c87b486b97ed
wind_farm_name: Mona
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1500 MW
resolved_value: 1500 MW
research_value: 1500 MW
resolved_fact_id: 36172.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.jnbp.com/project/mona/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: JERA Nex bp project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.jnbp.com/project/mona/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Multiple official/regulatory sources describe Mona as an approximately 1.5 GW / 1500 MW project. This aligns with the validation context.


wind_farm_id: 6733
canonical_id: adb534ae-db95-47e2-8954-c87b486b97ed
wind_farm_name: Mona
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1500 MW
resolved_value: 1500 MW
research_value: 1500 MW
resolved_fact_id: 36173.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Mona ES Climate Change chapter
source_of_record_licence: public planning document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010137/EN010137-000385-F4.2_Mona_ES_Climate%20Change.pdf

research_summary:
A project-specific source states the proposed export capacity is 1.5 GW; government material also frames the project around a maximum grid connection (1.5 GW). For Mona, gross planned capacity and export/grid connection capacity appear aligned at 1.5 GW in current accessible sources.

source_of_record_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010137/EN010137-000385-F4.2_Mona_ES_Climate%20Change.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6733
canonical_id: adb534ae-db95-47e2-8954-c87b486b97ed
wind_farm_name: Mona
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Mona ES Non-Technical Summary
source_of_record_licence: public planning document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010137/EN010137-002055-F1_Mona_ES_Non-Technical%20Summary%20F02.pdf

research_summary:
Current project-specific sources reviewed describe only an envelope design. No authoritative accessible source located names a selected turbine model for Mona specifically. Per instruction, this is left Not confirmed rather than inferred from generic turbine platforms.

source_of_record_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010137/EN010137-002055-F1_Mona_ES_Non-Technical%20Summary%20F02.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6733
canonical_id: adb534ae-db95-47e2-8954-c87b486b97ed
wind_farm_name: Mona
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.jnbp.com/project/mona/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: JERA Nex bp project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.jnbp.com/project/mona/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific authoritative source found that names a turbine OEM for Mona. The project remains at a consented pre-FID stage and current official materials do not disclose a selected manufacturer.


wind_farm_id: 6733
canonical_id: adb534ae-db95-47e2-8954-c87b486b97ed
wind_farm_name: Mona
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.jnbp.com/project/mona/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: JERA Nex bp project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.jnbp.com/project/mona/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific accessible source found confirming the selected per-turbine MW rating. The current evidence supports only an envelope of up to 96 turbines for around 1.5 GW, not a chosen unit rating.


wind_farm_id: 6733
canonical_id: adb534ae-db95-47e2-8954-c87b486b97ed
wind_farm_name: Mona
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 320 m
resolved_value: Up to 320 m
research_value: Up to 320 m
resolved_fact_id: 36174.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Mona ES Non-Technical Summary
source_of_record_licence: public planning document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010137/EN010137-002055-F1_Mona_ES_Non-Technical%20Summary%20F02.pdf

research_summary:
Project-specific DCO material states the maximum rotor diameter increased to 320 m. This is a consent envelope parameter, not an as-selected turbine specification.


wind_farm_id: 6733
canonical_id: adb534ae-db95-47e2-8954-c87b486b97ed
wind_farm_name: Mona
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Mona ES Non-Technical Summary
source_of_record_licence: public planning document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific source found that explicitly states hub height for Mona. Available project materials provide tip height, rotor diameter and blade clearance, but not a confirmed hub height. With no linked EuroWindWakes turbine row available, this remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6733
canonical_id: adb534ae-db95-47e2-8954-c87b486b97ed
wind_farm_name: Mona
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 96
resolved_value: Up to 96
research_value: Up to 96
resolved_fact_id: 36175.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.jnbp.com/project/mona/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: JERA Nex bp project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.jnbp.com/project/mona/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current official project and DCO sources consistently say up to 96 turbines. This differs from the non-web validation signal of 0, which is likely because the database hint is not tracking consented layout parameters for an unbuilt project. The web-sourced value is preferred here because it is project-specific and current.


wind_farm_id: 6733
canonical_id: adb534ae-db95-47e2-8954-c87b486b97ed
wind_farm_name: Mona
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Gravity base or jacket foundations on pin-piles / suction buckets
resolved_value: Gravity base or jacket foundations on pin-piles / suction buckets
research_value: Gravity base or jacket foundations on pin-piles / suction buckets
resolved_fact_id: 36176.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Mona consultation report appendix
source_of_record_licence: public planning document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010137/EN010137-000105-E3.1_Mona_Consultation%20Report%20Appendix%20Part%203.pdf

research_summary:
Mona’s consultation-response / DCO documentation says the monopile option was removed after PEIR and retained options are gravity base foundations and jacket foundations on pin-piles or suction buckets. As-built type is therefore not yet fixed, but these are the consented project-specific foundation options.

source_of_record_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010137/EN010137-000105-E3.1_Mona_Consultation%20Report%20Appendix%20Part%203.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6733
canonical_id: adb534ae-db95-47e2-8954-c87b486b97ed
wind_farm_name: Mona
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: JERA Nex bp acquisition announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No authoritative accessible source found confirming that FID has been taken. JERA Nex bp’s 16/01/2026 announcement explicitly says the lease/acquisition is a step towards FID, indicating FID had not yet been taken as of that date.


wind_farm_id: 6733
canonical_id: adb534ae-db95-47e2-8954-c87b486b97ed
wind_farm_name: Mona
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.jnbp.com/project/mona/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: JERA Nex bp project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.jnbp.com/project/mona/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No evidence of commissioning was found; the project is still pre-construction. Earlier application-stage material referenced an aim for operation by 2030, but that is not a commissioning fact.


wind_farm_id: 6734
canonical_id: 453196f8-6d31-481e-a8f2-ace958f94343
wind_farm_name: Morecambe
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Morecambe Offshore Windfarm Generation Assets
research_value: Morecambe Offshore Windfarm Generation Assets
citation_url: https://morecambeandmorgan.com/morecambe/en/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Morecambe Offshore Windfarm Limited and Morgan Offshore Wind Limited project page
source_of_record_url: https://morecambeandmorgan.com/morecambe/en/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official project pages and the DESNZ decision page use the name “Morecambe Offshore Windfarm Generation Assets”. Historic development material also refers to “Morecambe Offshore Windfarm” more generally.


wind_farm_id: 6734
canonical_id: 453196f8-6d31-481e-a8f2-ace958f94343
wind_farm_name: Morecambe
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35632.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Morecambe Offshore Wind project statement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: originally Cobra Instalaciones y Servicios, S.A. and Flotation Energy Ltd JV; current owner: CI Flagship Fund V / Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners (100%); development/construction led by Copenhagen Offshore Partners; Flotation Energy remains development partner

resolved_value:
Developer: originally Cobra Instalaciones y Servicios, S.A. and Flotation Energy Ltd JV; current owner: CI Flagship Fund V / Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners (100%); development/construction led by Copenhagen Offshore Partners; Flotation Energy remains development partner

citation_url:
https://morecambeoffshorewind.com/statement-on-the-transmission-assets-for-the-morecambe-offshore-windfarm/

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on: 28/01/2026. That dated project statement confirms full CIP fund ownership. Earlier project materials and the applicant explanatory memorandum show the original Cobra + Flotation Energy JV and record CIP’s 06/02/2025 agreement to acquire full ownership.

source_of_record_url:
https://morecambeoffshorewind.com/statement-on-the-transmission-assets-for-the-morecambe-offshore-windfarm/


wind_farm_id: 6734
canonical_id: 453196f8-6d31-481e-a8f2-ace958f94343
wind_farm_name: Morecambe
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Applicant explanatory memorandum
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Cobra + Flotation Energy JV at development stage; agreement for CIP full acquisition signed 06/02/2025; by 28/01/2026 project website states CIP fund ownership at 100%

research_value:
Cobra + Flotation Energy JV at development stage; agreement for CIP full acquisition signed 06/02/2025; by 28/01/2026 project website states CIP fund ownership at 100%

citation_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010121-001266-Morecambe%20Offshore%20Windfarm%20Ltd%20-%203.2.1%20Explanatory%20Memorandum%20-%20Revision%2007%20%28Tracked%29.pdf

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on: 28/01/2026. The project moved from a Cobra/Flotation Energy joint venture to full CIP ownership. Planning documents explicitly note the 06/02/2025 agreement; newer project pages describe the project as fully owned by CIP.

source_of_record_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010121-001266-Morecambe%20Offshore%20Windfarm%20Ltd%20-%203.2.1%20Explanatory%20Memorandum%20-%20Revision%2007%20%28Tracked%29.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6734
canonical_id: 453196f8-6d31-481e-a8f2-ace958f94343
wind_farm_name: Morecambe
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Consented
resolved_value: Consented
research_value: Consented
resolved_fact_id: 35633.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/morecambe-offshore-windfarm-generation-assets-dco-decision
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK DCO decision
source_of_record_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/morecambe-offshore-windfarm-generation-assets-dco-decision
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
DESNZ granted development consent on 01/12/2025. The project website still says construction is subject to a positive Financial Investment Decision, so the closest exact Boundary Layer label is Consented, not FID-taken or under construction.


wind_farm_id: 6734
canonical_id: 453196f8-6d31-481e-a8f2-ace958f94343
wind_farm_name: Morecambe
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 480 MW
resolved_value: 480 MW
research_value: 480 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35634.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://morecambeandmorgan.com/morecambe/en/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Morecambe project page
source_of_record_url: https://morecambeandmorgan.com/morecambe/en/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Multiple official project and government sources state nominal/proposed capacity of 480 MW. This aligns with the database context.


