# wind_farm_dossier_fields

wind_farm_id: 6734
canonical_id: 453196f8-6d31-481e-a8f2-ace958f94343
wind_farm_name: Morecambe
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 480 MW
resolved_value: 480 MW
research_value: 480 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35635.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DESNZ decision letter PDF
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010121-000383-Decision%20letter%20Morecambe%20OWF%20GA%20for%20Signature%20011225%20redacted.pdf

research_summary:
The decision letter describes the project as an offshore wind generating station with an electricity export capacity of 480 MW. No separate lower MEC was found in accessible project-specific sources.

source_of_record_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010121-000383-Decision%20letter%20Morecambe%20OWF%20GA%20for%20Signature%20011225%20redacted.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6734
canonical_id: 453196f8-6d31-481e-a8f2-ace958f94343
wind_farm_name: Morecambe
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Morecambe consultation brochure
source_of_record_licence: public PDF
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://morecambeandmorgan.com/assets/images/shared/downloads/morecambe/MORECAMBE-Brochure-V15_pages.pdf

research_summary:
Accessible project-specific sources describe a design envelope only; no selected turbine model was named. Per instruction, no turbine model is inferred from generic OEM platforms or other projects.

source_of_record_url:
https://morecambeandmorgan.com/assets/images/shared/downloads/morecambe/MORECAMBE-Brochure-V15_pages.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6734
canonical_id: 453196f8-6d31-481e-a8f2-ace958f94343
wind_farm_name: Morecambe
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://morecambeoffshorewind.com/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Morecambe project website
source_of_record_url: https://morecambeoffshorewind.com/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific accessible source identified a selected OEM. The project remains at consented/pre-FID stage in public materials reviewed.


wind_farm_id: 6734
canonical_id: 453196f8-6d31-481e-a8f2-ace958f94343
wind_farm_name: Morecambe
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://bp-mmt.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/morecambe/MORECAMBE-GEN-Newsletter-spreads.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Autumn 2023 Morecambe newsletter
source_of_record_url: https://bp-mmt.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/morecambe/MORECAMBE-GEN-Newsletter-spreads.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public PDF
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No selected turbine has been publicly confirmed. A quotient from 480 MW and up to 35 turbines would be an inference, so it is not used.


wind_farm_id: 6734
canonical_id: 453196f8-6d31-481e-a8f2-ace958f94343
wind_farm_name: Morecambe
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Morecambe consultation brochure
source_of_record_licence: public PDF
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://morecambeandmorgan.com/assets/images/shared/downloads/morecambe/MORECAMBE-Brochure-V15_pages.pdf

research_summary:
Project-specific sources give only an envelope, not an as-selected turbine. The 2023 brochure says proposed rotor diameter between 220 m and 300 m; because no chosen turbine is confirmed, final rotor diameter remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6734
canonical_id: 453196f8-6d31-481e-a8f2-ace958f94343
wind_farm_name: Morecambe
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Navigation Risk Assessment appendix
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010121/EN010121-000852-5.2.14.1%20Appendix%2014.1%20Navigation%20Risk%20Assessment_Rev%2002_Clean.pdf

research_summary:
No project-specific source found a selected hub height. Available documents describe maximum tip height / design envelope rather than a chosen turbine hub height.

source_of_record_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010121/EN010121-000852-5.2.14.1%20Appendix%2014.1%20Navigation%20Risk%20Assessment_Rev%2002_Clean.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6734
canonical_id: 453196f8-6d31-481e-a8f2-ace958f94343
wind_farm_name: Morecambe
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 35
resolved_value: Up to 35
research_value: Up to 35
resolved_fact_id: 35636.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DESNZ decision letter PDF
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010121-000383-Decision%20letter%20Morecambe%20OWF%20GA%20for%20Signature%20011225%20redacted.pdf

research_summary:
The consented project allows up to 35 turbines. This differs from the provided non-web validation signal of 0, which is most likely a placeholder for a not-yet-built site rather than the consented maximum in current project documents.


wind_farm_id: 6734
canonical_id: 453196f8-6d31-481e-a8f2-ace958f94343
wind_farm_name: Morecambe
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Fixed foundations; specific type not confirmed
resolved_value: Fixed foundations; specific type not confirmed
research_value: Fixed foundations; specific type not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 35637.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/morecambe-offshore-windfarm-generation-assets-dco-decision
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK DCO decision
source_of_record_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/morecambe-offshore-windfarm-generation-assets-dco-decision
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Government and project sources consistently describe fixed foundations, but no final selected foundation subtype was confirmed from accessible project-specific sources.


wind_farm_id: 6734
canonical_id: 453196f8-6d31-481e-a8f2-ace958f94343
wind_farm_name: Morecambe
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://morecambeoffshorewind.com/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Morecambe project website
source_of_record_url: https://morecambeoffshorewind.com/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible authoritative source found a positive FID. The project website still states construction is subject to a positive FID.


wind_farm_id: 6734
canonical_id: 453196f8-6d31-481e-a8f2-ace958f94343
wind_farm_name: Morecambe
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://morecambeoffshorewind.com/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Morecambe project website
source_of_record_url: https://morecambeoffshorewind.com/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project is not yet under construction in the sources reviewed; no first-power milestone was confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6734
canonical_id: 453196f8-6d31-481e-a8f2-ace958f94343
wind_farm_name: Morecambe
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://bp-mmt.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/morecambe/MORECAMBE-GEN-Newsletter-spreads.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Autumn 2023 Morecambe newsletter
source_of_record_url: https://bp-mmt.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/morecambe/MORECAMBE-GEN-Newsletter-spreads.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public PDF
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No as-built commissioning date exists yet. Earlier consultation material indicated expected COD in 2028/29, but that was pre-consent and explicitly indicative, so full commissioning is not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6735
canonical_id: 09892cbf-9cff-4c26-9e6f-280bb0fc7b89
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 6 (Morgan)
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2025/1012/pdfs/uksi_20251012_en.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: The Morgan Offshore Wind Project Generation Assets Order 2025
source_of_record_url: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2025/1012/pdfs/uksi_20251012_en.pdf
source_of_record_licence: UK legislation reuse terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Morgan Offshore Wind Project: Generation Assets; alternative references: Morgan Offshore Wind Project, Morgan Generation, Morgan Generation Offshore Wind Farm

research_value:
Morgan Offshore Wind Project: Generation Assets; alternative references: Morgan Offshore Wind Project, Morgan Generation, Morgan Generation Offshore Wind Farm

research_summary:
bp and EnBW announced the project name “Morgan” in July 2021. The consented NSIP application and 2025 Order use the formal name Morgan Offshore Wind Project: Generation Assets / Morgan Offshore Wind Project Generation Assets Order 2025.


wind_farm_id: 6735
canonical_id: 09892cbf-9cff-4c26-9e6f-280bb0fc7b89
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 6 (Morgan)
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35639.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EnBW withdrawal announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Morgan Offshore Wind Limited. Freshest ownership evidence indicates the former bp/EnBW development JV has changed; EnBW exited in January 2026 and JERA Nex bp is the continuing bp-affiliated offshore wind vehicle. Operator: Not confirmed.

resolved_value:
Developer: Morgan Offshore Wind Limited. Freshest ownership evidence indicates the former bp/EnBW development JV has changed; EnBW exited in January 2026 and JERA Nex bp is the continuing bp-affiliated offshore wind vehicle. Operator: Not confirmed.

citation_url:
https://www.enbw.com/investors/news-and-publications/enbw-will-not-continue-offshore-wind-projects-mona-and-morgan.html

research_summary:
JERA Nex bp’s Aug 2025 release said Morgan was “Developed by JERA Nex bp and EnBW.” The freshest dated ownership source is EnBW’s January 2026 announcement that it would not continue Morgan and Mona, after developing them since 2021 with JERA Nex bp. No fresh official page found that clearly sets out the post-EnBW legal ownership structure for Morgan specifically, so operator and final equity split are Not confirmed. Freshest source date relied on: 15/01/2026.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.enbw.com/investors/news-and-publications/enbw-will-not-continue-offshore-wind-projects-mona-and-morgan.html


wind_farm_id: 6735
canonical_id: 09892cbf-9cff-4c26-9e6f-280bb0fc7b89
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 6 (Morgan)
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EnBW withdrawal announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
2021–2025: developed by bp and EnBW; from 04/08/2025 the bp interest sat within JERA Nex bp; 15/01/2026 EnBW announced it would not continue Morgan; current reconciled full ownership percentages: Not confirmed

research_value:
2021–2025: developed by bp and EnBW; from 04/08/2025 the bp interest sat within JERA Nex bp; 15/01/2026 EnBW announced it would not continue Morgan; current reconciled full ownership percentages: Not confirmed

citation_url:
https://www.enbw.com/investors/news-and-publications/enbw-will-not-continue-offshore-wind-projects-mona-and-morgan.html

research_summary:
bp and EnBW publicly launched Morgan in 2021. JERA and bp completed JERA Nex bp on 04/08/2025, and JERA Nex bp’s 29/08/2025 Morgan release described the project as developed by JERA Nex bp and EnBW. The freshest dated source is EnBW’s 15/01/2026 statement that it would not continue Morgan. Unlike Mona, no official source found here explicitly states a completed transfer of Morgan equity or percentages; therefore a full current ownership split cannot be responsibly reconstructed. Freshest source date relied on: 15/01/2026.


wind_farm_id: 6735
canonical_id: 09892cbf-9cff-4c26-9e6f-280bb0fc7b89
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 6 (Morgan)
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Consented
resolved_value: Consented
research_value: Consented
resolved_fact_id: 35640.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Planning Inspectorate decision notice
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/morgan-offshore-wind-project-generation-assets-development-consent-decision-announced

research_summary:
DESNZ granted development consent on 29/08/2025. However, the freshest ownership/commercial update is EnBW’s 15/01/2026 statement that the partners would not continue Morgan after failing to secure AR7 revenue support. The project therefore remains best classified within the Boundary Layer list as Consented, with the nuance that it is consented but commercially stalled/discontinued by the then developers.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/morgan-offshore-wind-project-generation-assets-development-consent-decision-announced


wind_farm_id: 6735
canonical_id: 09892cbf-9cff-4c26-9e6f-280bb0fc7b89
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 6 (Morgan)
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1500 MW
resolved_value: 1500 MW
research_value: 1500 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35641.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Planning Inspectorate decision notice
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/morgan-offshore-wind-project-generation-assets-development-consent-decision-announced

research_summary:
The consent decision notice states an “approximate capacity of 1500MW”. Project consultation and technical documents also describe a nominal/potential generating capacity of 1.5 GW.


wind_farm_id: 6735
canonical_id: 09892cbf-9cff-4c26-9e6f-280bb0fc7b89
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 6 (Morgan)
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1400 MW
resolved_value: 1400 MW
research_value: 1400 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35642.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DESNZ correction-of-errors decision
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-morgan-offshore-wind-project-generation-assets-order-2025-correction-of-errors-planning-act-2008

research_summary:
The clearest accessible authoritative value found is in the April 2026 correction-of-errors decision page, which lists Minimum output 1,400 MW for the made Order. Project ES greenhouse-gas material discusses 1,500 MW as assumed export/generating capacity, so there is a distinction between gross project capacity and the DCO minimum output. Using the statutory decision page, MEC-equivalent export/consented output is best recorded here as 1400 MW.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-morgan-offshore-wind-project-generation-assets-order-2025-correction-of-errors-planning-act-2008


wind_farm_id: 6735
canonical_id: 09892cbf-9cff-4c26-9e6f-280bb0fc7b89
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 6 (Morgan)
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Morgan Project Description
source_of_record_licence: public planning document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010136/EN010136-000145-F1.3_Morgan_Gen_ES_Project%20description.pdf

research_summary:
No project-specific official source found naming a selected turbine model. The DCO/ES uses a design envelope only, with turbines up to 96 units and rotor diameters up to 320 m. Per instructions and because no linked EuroWindWakes turbine row exists, this remains Not confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010136/EN010136-000145-F1.3_Morgan_Gen_ES_Project%20description.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6735
canonical_id: 09892cbf-9cff-4c26-9e6f-280bb0fc7b89
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 6 (Morgan)
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Morgan Project Description
source_of_record_licence: public planning document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010136/EN010136-000145-F1.3_Morgan_Gen_ES_Project%20description.pdf

research_summary:
No project-specific official source found naming an OEM for Morgan. The available project material is envelope-based and does not tie an OEM to the project.


wind_farm_id: 6735
canonical_id: 09892cbf-9cff-4c26-9e6f-280bb0fc7b89
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 6 (Morgan)
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Morgan Project Description
source_of_record_licence: public planning document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project documents state that the final turbine count depends on the capacity of the selected turbines, but do not confirm a chosen unit rating. No project-specific award or OEM contract was found.


wind_farm_id: 6735
canonical_id: 09892cbf-9cff-4c26-9e6f-280bb0fc7b89
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 6 (Morgan)
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Morgan draft DCO
source_of_record_licence: public planning document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010136-001007-S_D6_10_Morgan%20Gen_Draft%20Development%20Consent%20Order_F08.pdf

research_summary:
Project-specific sources only confirm an envelope, not an as-selected turbine. The draft DCO allows a maximum rotor diameter of 320 m; the ES also assesses a 250 m scenario. Because no chosen turbine is confirmed for Morgan, a site-specific rotor diameter is Not confirmed rather than inferred.

source_of_record_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010136-001007-S_D6_10_Morgan%20Gen_Draft%20Development%20Consent%20Order_F08.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6735
canonical_id: 09892cbf-9cff-4c26-9e6f-280bb0fc7b89
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 6 (Morgan)
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Morgan radar technical report
source_of_record_licence: public planning document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010136/EN010136-000182-F4.9.1_Morgan_Gen_ES_Radar%20early%20warning%20technical%20report.pdf

research_summary:
No selected site-specific hub height was confirmed. Project documents give envelope values only, including 168 m centre-point in one technical report and “minimum hub height of 159 m above LAT” in ornithology modelling. Because these are assessment/design-envelope values rather than a chosen turbine specification, hub height is Not confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010136/EN010136-000182-F4.9.1_Morgan_Gen_ES_Radar%20early%20warning%20technical%20report.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6735
canonical_id: 09892cbf-9cff-4c26-9e6f-280bb0fc7b89
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 6 (Morgan)
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 96
resolved_value: 96
research_value: 96
resolved_fact_id: 35643.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Morgan draft DCO
source_of_record_licence: public planning document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010136-001007-S_D6_10_Morgan%20Gen_Draft%20Development%20Consent%20Order_F08.pdf

research_summary:
The consented project allows up to 96 turbines. Multiple project documents also explain that the final number could be lower, with scenarios down to 68 depending on turbine size. This differs from the database validation hint of 0, which is likely an outdated pre-build dataset placeholder rather than a web-sourced project figure.


wind_farm_id: 6735
canonical_id: 09892cbf-9cff-4c26-9e6f-280bb0fc7b89
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 6 (Morgan)
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35644.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2025/1012/pdfs/uksi_20251012_en.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: The Morgan Offshore Wind Project Generation Assets Order 2025
source_of_record_url: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2025/1012/pdfs/uksi_20251012_en.pdf
source_of_record_licence: UK legislation reuse terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Fixed-bottom; permitted foundation types are jacket pin-pile, jacket suction bucket, or gravity base

resolved_value:
Fixed-bottom; permitted foundation types are jacket pin-pile, jacket suction bucket, or gravity base

research_summary:
The navigational risk assessment says all options under investigation are fixed rather than floating. The made Order defines “foundation” as multi-leg pin-piled jacket, multi-leg suction bucket jacket, or gravity base. No final selected foundation type was confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6735
canonical_id: 09892cbf-9cff-4c26-9e6f-280bb0fc7b89
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 6 (Morgan)
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 29/08/2025
resolved_value: 29/08/2025
research_value: 29/08/2025
resolved_fact_id: 35645.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2025/1012/pdfs/uksi_20251012_en.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: The Morgan Offshore Wind Project Generation Assets Order 2025
source_of_record_url: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2025/1012/pdfs/uksi_20251012_en.pdf
source_of_record_licence: UK legislation reuse terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The Secretary of State granted development consent on 29/08/2025. The made Order is dated the same day.


wind_farm_id: 6735
canonical_id: 09892cbf-9cff-4c26-9e6f-280bb0fc7b89
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 6 (Morgan)
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EnBW withdrawal announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No authoritative source found confirming a project FID. The 2026 EnBW statement instead indicates the partners would not continue the project after missing CfD support.


wind_farm_id: 6735
canonical_id: 09892cbf-9cff-4c26-9e6f-280bb0fc7b89
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 6 (Morgan)
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EnBW withdrawal announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No first-power milestone exists because the project has not been built. Earlier project material targeted full operation by 2030, but no first-power date was confirmed and the project later became commercially stalled.


wind_farm_id: 6735
canonical_id: 09892cbf-9cff-4c26-9e6f-280bb0fc7b89
wind_farm_name: R4 Project 6 (Morgan)
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EnBW withdrawal announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No commissioning date is confirmed. Project description material said the developer intended full operation by 2030, but that was a target, not an achieved or committed commissioning milestone, and later ownership/commercial developments undermined it.


wind_farm_id: 6736
canonical_id: 2843103c-469d-4c3a-92fc-ea6514cd0619
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Vanguard East
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Norfolk Vanguard East
research_value: Norfolk Vanguard East
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE Offshore Decommissioning Programme || Vanguard East
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://norfolkzone.rwe.com/-/media/Project/Team/Norfolk/notices/decomm/2026-02-03-offshore-decommissioning-programme-draft-for-consultation.pdf?hash=F6596A3188B1F0254E6E108D&rev=6c6ba36864b842ad98f7914ec02c5055

research_summary:
Current project materials use “Vanguard East” / “Norfolk Vanguard East” as one of three projects in RWE’s Norfolk Offshore Wind Zone. The wider original DCO was for Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm (covering East and West together), and Vanguard East was later created through a transfer/splitting of DCO benefits.

source_of_record_url:
https://norfolkzone.rwe.com/-/media/Project/Team/Norfolk/notices/decomm/2026-02-03-offshore-decommissioning-programme-draft-for-consultation.pdf?hash=F6596A3188B1F0254E6E108D&rev=6c6ba36864b842ad98f7914ec02c5055


wind_farm_id: 6736
canonical_id: 2843103c-469d-4c3a-92fc-ea6514cd0619
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Vanguard East
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Developer: RWE; Current owner(s): RWE 100% pending KKR transaction; Operator: RWE
resolved_value: Developer: RWE; Current owner(s): RWE 100% pending KKR transaction; Operator: RWE
research_value: Developer: RWE; Current owner(s): RWE 100% pending KKR transaction; Operator: RWE
resolved_fact_id: 35646.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE AR7 and KKR partnership announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Freshest ownership source is RWE dated 14/01/2026, stating KKR will acquire a 50% equity stake in each Norfolk Vanguard project, with closing expected in summer 2026; that means the deal was announced but not yet closed. RWE’s project page describes Vanguard East as fully owned and developed by RWE, but that page is older/undated background.


wind_farm_id: 6736
canonical_id: 2843103c-469d-4c3a-92fc-ea6514cd0619
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Vanguard East
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://norfolkzone.rwe.com/news/2024-03-27-rwe-expands-its-uk-offshore-wind-development-portfolio
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE completion announcement
source_of_record_url: https://norfolkzone.rwe.com/news/2024-03-27-rwe-expands-its-uk-offshore-wind-development-portfolio
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Originally developed by Vattenfall; acquired by RWE on 27/03/2024; proposed future split RWE 50% / KKR 50% not yet closed

research_value:
Originally developed by Vattenfall; acquired by RWE on 27/03/2024; proposed future split RWE 50% / KKR 50% not yet closed

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on for current/future ownership is 14/01/2026 from RWE. Ownership history is: Vattenfall developed the Norfolk Zone; Vattenfall announced divestment to RWE in 21/12/2023; RWE announced completion of the acquisition on 27/03/2024; RWE then announced a planned 50/50 partnership with KKR on 14/01/2026, subject to approvals and expected summer 2026 closing.


wind_farm_id: 6736
canonical_id: 2843103c-469d-4c3a-92fc-ea6514cd0619
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Vanguard East
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: FID Taken, Pre-Construction
resolved_value: FID Taken, Pre-Construction
research_value: FID Taken, Pre-Construction
resolved_fact_id: 35647.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Aker Solutions full notice to proceed announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.akersolutions.com/news/news-archive/2025/aker-solutions-asa-aker-solutions-and-siemens-energy-awarded-full-notice-to-proceed-on-norfolk-vanguard-west-and-east/

research_summary:
Best-fit Boundary Layer status is FID Taken, Pre-Construction. Evidence is slightly nuanced: RWE’s Norfolk Zone site says offshore construction is expected to begin early 2027, while RWE’s 10/03/2026 turbine announcement says it is targeting summer 2026 FID. However, Aker Solutions states RWE already issued full notice to proceed on West and East on 15/01/2025 for major HVDC packages, and Vestas announced a firm turbine supply agreement on 10/03/2026. That package award pattern indicates pre-construction with major contracts placed, even though overall project-level FID timing language remains partly inconsistent.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.akersolutions.com/news/news-archive/2025/aker-solutions-asa-aker-solutions-and-siemens-energy-awarded-full-notice-to-proceed-on-norfolk-vanguard-west-and-east/


wind_farm_id: 6736
canonical_id: 2843103c-469d-4c3a-92fc-ea6514cd0619
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Vanguard East
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1,380 MW
resolved_value: 1,380 MW
research_value: 1,380 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35648.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE Offshore Decommissioning Programme || Vanguard East
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://norfolkzone.rwe.com/-/media/Project/Team/Norfolk/notices/decomm/2026-02-03-offshore-decommissioning-programme-draft-for-consultation.pdf?hash=F6596A3188B1F0254E6E108D&rev=6c6ba36864b842ad98f7914ec02c5055

research_summary:
Project-specific 2026 RWE decommissioning documentation states 1.38 GW for Vanguard East, matching RWE’s 2026 Vestas turbine order of 92 x 15 MW = 1,380 MW. Older Norfolk Zone overview pages round each project to 1.4 GW; the project-specific figure is more precise and preferred.


wind_farm_id: 6736
canonical_id: 2843103c-469d-4c3a-92fc-ea6514cd0619
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Vanguard East
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE Offshore Decommissioning Programme || Vanguard East
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible project-specific source located in this search set explicitly states a separate MEC for Norfolk Vanguard East. Available sources confirm installed/project capacity, grid connection and HVDC infrastructure, but do not clearly publish a distinct MEC value for this phase.


wind_farm_id: 6736
canonical_id: 2843103c-469d-4c3a-92fc-ea6514cd0619
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Vanguard East
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas V236-15.0 MW
resolved_value: Vestas V236-15.0 MW
research_value: Vestas V236-15.0 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35649.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE Vanguard East turbine supply announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://uk.rwe.com/press-and-news/2026-03-10-rwe-and-vestas-agree-turbine-supply-agreement-for-vanguard-east-offshore-wind-farm/

research_summary:
Confirmed directly for this phase by RWE’s 10/03/2026 Vanguard East turbine supply announcement. Earlier planning material referenced generic/proposed turbine parameters only, so the 2026 RWE contract announcement is the clearest project-specific confirmation.

source_of_record_url:
https://uk.rwe.com/press-and-news/2026-03-10-rwe-and-vestas-agree-turbine-supply-agreement-for-vanguard-east-offshore-wind-farm/


wind_farm_id: 6736
canonical_id: 2843103c-469d-4c3a-92fc-ea6514cd0619
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Vanguard East
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas
resolved_value: Vestas
research_value: Vestas
resolved_fact_id: 35650.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE Vanguard East turbine supply announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://uk.rwe.com/press-and-news/2026-03-10-rwe-and-vestas-agree-turbine-supply-agreement-for-vanguard-east-offshore-wind-farm/

research_summary:
Confirmed by RWE’s East-specific turbine supply contract announcement. No conflicting newer official source found.


wind_farm_id: 6736
canonical_id: 2843103c-469d-4c3a-92fc-ea6514cd0619
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Vanguard East
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 236 m
resolved_value: 236 m
research_value: 236 m
resolved_fact_id: 35652.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE Vanguard East turbine supply announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
RWE’s 10/03/2026 East-specific release explicitly gives V236-15.0 MW and states rotor diameter of 236 metres.


wind_farm_id: 6736
canonical_id: 2843103c-469d-4c3a-92fc-ea6514cd0619
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Vanguard East
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Norfolk Vanguard capacity NMC supporting statement
source_of_record_licence: public sector information
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/657c4b4a95bf65000d719087/01_-_Supporting_Statement_-_Norfolk_Vanguard_Capacity_NMC.pdf

research_summary:
No project-specific web source found in this search set that explicitly confirms the final as-built/approved hub height for Vanguard East. A 2023/2024 NMC supporting statement for Norfolk Vanguard West and East modelled a minimum hub height 149.5 m MHWS for a proposed 145-turbine design, but it is not East-specific as-built confirmation for this phase, so this field is left Not confirmed per instruction not to infer site-specific turbine specs.


wind_farm_id: 6736
canonical_id: 2843103c-469d-4c3a-92fc-ea6514cd0619
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Vanguard East
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 92
resolved_value: 92
research_value: 92
resolved_fact_id: 35653.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE Offshore Decommissioning Programme || Vanguard East
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific 2026 sources for Vanguard East consistently state up to 92 WTGs / 92 turbines. This differs from the database validation hint of 145, which appears to apply to the amended combined Norfolk Vanguard consent envelope rather than Vanguard East alone. The project-specific web-sourced East figure therefore does not align with the 145 validation signal because of phase-scope differences.


wind_farm_id: 6736
canonical_id: 2843103c-469d-4c3a-92fc-ea6514cd0619
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Vanguard East
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile with transition piece
resolved_value: Monopile with transition piece
research_value: Monopile with transition piece
resolved_fact_id: 35654.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE Offshore Decommissioning Programme || Vanguard East
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific 2026 decommissioning documentation explicitly lists foundation type as “Monopile with Transition Piece”. I did not find a second equally direct official source, so this row relies primarily on that authoritative project document.


wind_farm_id: 6736
canonical_id: 2843103c-469d-4c3a-92fc-ea6514cd0619
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Vanguard East
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 11/02/2022
resolved_value: 11/02/2022
research_value: 11/02/2022
resolved_fact_id: 35655.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/norfolk-vanguard-development-consent-decision-announced
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK Norfolk Vanguard development consent decision
source_of_record_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/norfolk-vanguard-development-consent-decision-announced
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence v3.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Norfolk Vanguard’s redetermined DCO was granted on 11 February 2022. RWE’s Norfolk Zone page confirms this date for Vanguard East as part of the original Norfolk Vanguard consent framework; later project splitting created the standalone Vanguard East project entity.


wind_farm_id: 6736
canonical_id: 2843103c-469d-4c3a-92fc-ea6514cd0619
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Vanguard East
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE Vanguard East turbine supply announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
RWE’s 10/03/2026 release says it is targeting FID in summer 2026, so no completed FID date was confirmed by accessible sources reviewed here. Although full notice to proceed was issued for major HVDC packages in January 2025, that is not the same as a clearly stated overall project FID date for Vanguard East.


wind_farm_id: 6736
canonical_id: 2843103c-469d-4c3a-92fc-ea6514cd0619
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Vanguard East
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE Vanguard East turbine supply announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible source reviewed here gives a first-power date for Vanguard East. RWE only states turbine commissioning is expected in 2030.


wind_farm_id: 6736
canonical_id: 2843103c-469d-4c3a-92fc-ea6514cd0619
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Vanguard East
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/01/2030
resolved_value: 01/01/2030
research_value: 01/01/2030
resolved_fact_id: 35656.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE Vanguard East turbine supply announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
RWE’s 10/03/2026 East-specific release says “commissioning of the East project expected in 2030.” Because only the year is confirmed, this is normalized to 01/01/2030 per instruction.


wind_farm_id: 6737
canonical_id: e54f2e7a-034a-4e89-9c2b-455d9de15e89
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Boreas
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm
research_value: Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK Norfolk Boreas Limited: Development Consent Order, Planning Act 2008
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence v3.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/norfolk-boreas-limited-development-consent-order-planning-act-2008

research_summary:
Official project name is consistently given as Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm in UK government consent records and RWE’s current Norfolk Zone project pages. It sits within the wider “Norfolk Offshore Wind Zone” / “Norfolk Zone” alongside Vanguard West and Vanguard East.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/norfolk-boreas-limited-development-consent-order-planning-act-2008


wind_farm_id: 6737
canonical_id: e54f2e7a-034a-4e89-9c2b-455d9de15e89
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Boreas
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35657.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://norfolkzone.rwe.com/about-norfolk
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE Norfolk Zone about page
source_of_record_url: https://norfolkzone.rwe.com/about-norfolk
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: RWE (current); Original developer: Vattenfall. Current owner: RWE 100%. Operator: Not confirmed separately; project is being developed by RWE.

resolved_value:
Developer: RWE (current); Original developer: Vattenfall. Current owner: RWE 100%. Operator: Not confirmed separately; project is being developed by RWE.

research_summary:
Freshest ownership source used is RWE’s current Norfolk Zone page, which states Boreas “is fully owned, and being developed by, RWE (100%).” RWE/Vattenfall official sale announcements confirm transfer of the Norfolk Offshore Wind Zone completed on 27/03/2024. No separate project operator is clearly stated in accessible current sources, so operator is not confirmed separately from owner/developer.


wind_farm_id: 6737
canonical_id: e54f2e7a-034a-4e89-9c2b-455d9de15e89
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Boreas
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Vattenfall development phase; sold to RWE, completed 27/03/2024; current ownership RWE 100%
research_value: Vattenfall development phase; sold to RWE, completed 27/03/2024; current ownership RWE 100%
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall sale completion press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/press-and-media/pressreleases/2024/vattenfall-and-rwe-conclude-sale-of-norfolk-offshore-wind-zone

research_summary:
Freshest dated source relied on for current ownership is RWE’s current project page; dated sale confirmation comes from Vattenfall’s 27/03/2024 release. Boreas was originally developed by Vattenfall/Norfolk Boreas Ltd, then transferred with Vanguard East/West as part of the Norfolk Offshore Wind Zone sale to RWE.


wind_farm_id: 6737
canonical_id: e54f2e7a-034a-4e89-9c2b-455d9de15e89
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Boreas
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Consented
resolved_value: Consented
research_value: Consented
resolved_fact_id: 35658.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://norfolkzone.rwe.com/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE Norfolk Zone homepage
source_of_record_url: https://norfolkzone.rwe.com/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Boreas has a DCO granted on 10/12/2021 and RWE describes it as one of three “consented” projects. Offshore construction is stated as expected to begin in early 2027, so the closest Boundary Layer label remains Consented rather than FID-taken/pre-construction.


wind_farm_id: 6737
canonical_id: e54f2e7a-034a-4e89-9c2b-455d9de15e89
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Boreas
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1,400 MW
resolved_value: 1,400 MW
research_value: 1,400 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35659.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://norfolkzone.rwe.com/about-norfolk
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE Norfolk Zone about page
source_of_record_url: https://norfolkzone.rwe.com/about-norfolk
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
There is a clear historic-vs-current ambiguity. The original DCO/government decision capped output at up to 1,800 MW, but RWE’s current project pages state Boreas Offshore Wind Farm is a 1.4GW project. For a current project profile, 1,400 MW is the best-supported live project value.


wind_farm_id: 6737
canonical_id: e54f2e7a-034a-4e89-9c2b-455d9de15e89
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Boreas
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1,800 MW
resolved_value: 1,800 MW
research_value: 1,800 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35660.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK Norfolk Boreas DCO decision
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence v3.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/norfolk-boreas-limited-development-consent-order-planning-act-2008

research_summary:
Government consent material is explicit that the project’s maximum output/export capacity is up to 1,800 MW. RWE’s current public pages emphasize 1.4 GW project capacity, but do not supersede the DCO cap as an export/MEC figure.


wind_farm_id: 6737
canonical_id: e54f2e7a-034a-4e89-9c2b-455d9de15e89
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Boreas
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/norfolk-boreas-non-material-change-planning-act-2008
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK Norfolk Boreas non-material change decision
source_of_record_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/norfolk-boreas-non-material-change-planning-act-2008
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence v3.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current web sources reviewed do not provide a project-specific, Boreas-only confirmed final turbine model. Accessible official documents show consent envelopes and later non-material change work, but not a definitive final as-built/procured Boreas model. Per instruction, this is left as Not confirmed rather than inferred from Norfolk Zone supplier changes or another site.


wind_farm_id: 6737
canonical_id: e54f2e7a-034a-4e89-9c2b-455d9de15e89
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Boreas
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall Siemens Gamesa preferred supplier announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/uk/newsroom/pressreleases/2021/vattenfall-announces-siemens-gamesa-as-nominated-preferred-supplier-for-norfolk-vanguard-and-norfolk-boreas-projects

research_summary:
Vattenfall named Siemens Gamesa as nominated preferred supplier in 2021 for Norfolk Vanguard and Boreas, but ownership later changed and accessible current Boreas-specific pages do not confirm a final Boreas OEM. Therefore OEM is not confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/uk/newsroom/pressreleases/2021/vattenfall-announces-siemens-gamesa-as-nominated-preferred-supplier-for-norfolk-vanguard-and-norfolk-boreas-projects


wind_farm_id: 6737
canonical_id: e54f2e7a-034a-4e89-9c2b-455d9de15e89
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Boreas
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Norfolk Boreas NMC supporting statement
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public sector terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/657c5d7b83ba380013e1b629/Norfolk_Boreas_NMC_Supporting_Statement.pdf

research_summary:
The 2022/2023 non-material change material discusses a proposed >14.7 MW turbine case and the consented design envelope includes 11.55 MW and 14.7 MW options, but no accessible current source confirms the final selected Boreas turbine rating.

source_of_record_url:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/657c5d7b83ba380013e1b629/Norfolk_Boreas_NMC_Supporting_Statement.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6737
canonical_id: e54f2e7a-034a-4e89-9c2b-455d9de15e89
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Boreas
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Norfolk Boreas DCO PDF
source_of_record_licence: public document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://norfolkzone.rwe.com/-/media/Project/Team/Norfolk/resources/development-consent-orders/norfolk-boreas-development-consent-order.pdf

research_summary:
The DCO permits rotor diameter up to 303 m, while NMC analysis tables model consented and proposed cases with rotor radii equivalent to 200 m, 230 m, and 236 m rotor diameters. None of these accessible sources confirms the final Boreas turbine rotor diameter for the live project.

source_of_record_url:
https://norfolkzone.rwe.com/-/media/Project/Team/Norfolk/resources/development-consent-orders/norfolk-boreas-development-consent-order.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6737
canonical_id: e54f2e7a-034a-4e89-9c2b-455d9de15e89
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Boreas
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Norfolk Boreas NMC supporting statement
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public sector terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/657c5d7b83ba380013e1b629/Norfolk_Boreas_NMC_Supporting_Statement.pdf

research_summary:
The DCO and NMC papers provide design-envelope / assessed values only, not a confirmed final project turbine hub height. The NMC paper lists minimum hub heights for consented/proposed cases, but this still does not amount to a confirmed final selected Boreas turbine specification.


wind_farm_id: 6737
canonical_id: e54f2e7a-034a-4e89-9c2b-455d9de15e89
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Boreas
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 158
resolved_value: 158
research_value: 158
resolved_fact_id: 35661.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Broadland and South Norfolk project page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.southnorfolkandbroadland.gov.uk/planning/nationally-significant-infrastructure-projects/norfolk-boreas-rwe

research_summary:
Government consent and local authority project pages both state up to 158 turbines for Norfolk Boreas. This aligns with the provided non-web validation context and EMODnet hint of 158. Note that later NMC work modelled 137 turbines, but accessible current decision material reviewed here does not clearly supersede the consented public project figure for the project profile.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.southnorfolkandbroadland.gov.uk/planning/nationally-significant-infrastructure-projects/norfolk-boreas-rwe


wind_farm_id: 6737
canonical_id: e54f2e7a-034a-4e89-9c2b-455d9de15e89
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Boreas
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile, jacket, gravity base, or tetrabase (consented options; final type not confirmed)
resolved_value: Monopile, jacket, gravity base, or tetrabase (consented options; final type not confirmed)
research_value: Monopile, jacket, gravity base, or tetrabase (consented options; final type not confirmed)
resolved_fact_id: 35662.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Norfolk Boreas DCO PDF
source_of_record_licence: public document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://norfolkzone.rwe.com/-/media/Project/Team/Norfolk/resources/development-consent-orders/norfolk-boreas-development-consent-order.pdf

research_summary:
The DCO authorises wind turbine generators on one of several foundation types: monopile (piled or suction caisson), jacket (piled or suction caisson), gravity base, or tetrabase. No accessible current project-specific source confirms the final selected foundation type, so the consented options are reported and the final type remains unconfirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6737
canonical_id: e54f2e7a-034a-4e89-9c2b-455d9de15e89
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Boreas
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 10/12/2021
resolved_value: 10/12/2021
research_value: 10/12/2021
resolved_fact_id: 35663.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK Norfolk Boreas DCO decision
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence v3.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Consent date is clearly stated in government decision material and repeated on RWE’s current Norfolk Zone page.


wind_farm_id: 6737
canonical_id: e54f2e7a-034a-4e89-9c2b-455d9de15e89
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Boreas
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://norfolkzone.rwe.com/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE Norfolk Zone homepage
source_of_record_url: https://norfolkzone.rwe.com/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible current official source located confirms a Boreas FID. The project remains described as consented / in development, with offshore construction expected later.


wind_farm_id: 6737
canonical_id: e54f2e7a-034a-4e89-9c2b-455d9de15e89
wind_farm_name: Norfolk Boreas
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://norfolkzone.rwe.com/about-norfolk
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE Norfolk Zone about page
source_of_record_url: https://norfolkzone.rwe.com/about-norfolk
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
RWE states Norfolk Zone first power is expected before 2030, but this is zone-level timing rather than a clearly dated Boreas first-power milestone. No Boreas-specific first power date was confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6738
canonical_id: d487dec5-a53a-4d61-93cd-7bdbf2a9f4e6
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 1 (Breesea)
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Planning Inspectorate non-material change decision
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Hornsea Project Two (Hornsea 2); historic/project-company context includes Breesea Limited and Optimus Wind Limited within the original Hornsea Zone Project Two consent

research_value:
Hornsea Project Two (Hornsea 2); historic/project-company context includes Breesea Limited and Optimus Wind Limited within the original Hornsea Zone Project Two consent

citation_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010053-002177-Final-%20DL%20-%20NMC%20Hornsea%20Two%20Offshore%20Wind%20Farm%20Order.pdf

research_summary:
Planning Inspectorate material for Hornsea Two states the applicant entities were Optimus Wind Limited and Breesea Limited and refers to the consent as the Hornsea Project Two Order. The built operational project is publicly branded by Ørsted as Hornsea 2.

source_of_record_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010053-002177-Final-%20DL%20-%20NMC%20Hornsea%20Two%20Offshore%20Wind%20Farm%20Order.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6738
canonical_id: d487dec5-a53a-4d61-93cd-7bdbf2a9f4e6
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 1 (Breesea)
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35664.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2022/03/20220328503311
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted stake sale announcement
source_of_record_url: https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2022/03/20220328503311
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Ørsted. Current owners: Ørsted 50%, AXA IM Alts-led clients 25%, Crédit Agricole Assurances 25%. Operator: Ørsted

resolved_value:
Developer: Ørsted. Current owners: Ørsted 50%, AXA IM Alts-led clients 25%, Crédit Agricole Assurances 25%. Operator: Ørsted

research_summary:
Repaired from Ørsted source-of-record pages rather than the broken Crown Estate PDF. Ørsted’s 28/03/2022 announcement says it would divest a 50 % ownership stake in Hornsea 2 to a consortium comprising AXA IM Alts and Crédit Agricole Assurances, with each to own 25 % after closing. Ørsted’s 29/09/2022 completion announcement confirms the divestment closed. A newer Ørsted update dated 01/06/2025 confirms Ørsted runs operations directly after taking full control from Siemens Gamesa.


wind_farm_id: 6738
canonical_id: d487dec5-a53a-4d61-93cd-7bdbf2a9f4e6
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 1 (Breesea)
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/sites/default/files/publications/HOW02DecommissioningProgramme.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Hornsea Project Two Decommissioning Programme
source_of_record_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/sites/default/files/publications/HOW02DecommissioningProgramme.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Originally developed in the SMart Wind / Hornsea Zone structure; Ørsted acquired full ownership in 08/2015, then sold 50% in 2022 to AXA IM Alts-led clients and Crédit Agricole Assurances (25% each)

research_value:
Originally developed in the SMart Wind / Hornsea Zone structure; Ørsted acquired full ownership in 08/2015, then sold 50% in 2022 to AXA IM Alts-led clients and Crédit Agricole Assurances (25% each)

research_summary:
The decommissioning programme states “In August 2015, Ørsted Wind Power A/S acquired full ownership of Hornsea Project Two”. Ørsted then announced the 50% divestment on 28/03/2022 and completed it on 29/09/2022. Freshest source date relied on for the current split is 25/04/2023 from The Crown Estate report.


wind_farm_id: 6738
canonical_id: d487dec5-a53a-4d61-93cd-7bdbf2a9f4e6
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 1 (Breesea)
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 35665.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2022/08/20220831559011
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted full operation announcement
source_of_record_url: https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2022/08/20220831559011
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Ørsted announced on 31/08/2022 that Hornsea 2 was fully operational. A later dated operational update on 01/06/2025 about Ørsted taking full control of operations supports the project remaining operational.


wind_farm_id: 6738
canonical_id: d487dec5-a53a-4d61-93cd-7bdbf2a9f4e6
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 1 (Breesea)
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1386 MW
resolved_value: 1386 MW
research_value: 1386 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35666.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa Hornsea Two order announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific sources consistently give a gross installed capacity of 1,386 MW. This is the installed wind-farm capacity, not the lower export/transmission figure.


wind_farm_id: 6738
canonical_id: d487dec5-a53a-4d61-93cd-7bdbf2a9f4e6
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 1 (Breesea)
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1320 MW
resolved_value: 1320 MW
research_value: 1320 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35667.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ofgem preferred bidder press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/press-release/ofgem-announces-preferred-bidder-appointed-connection-worlds-biggest-wind-farm-hornsea-2

research_summary:
OFTO / transmission-side sources point to about 1320 MW export capacity. Ofgem’s 02/09/2022 press release says Hornsea 2 has a capacity of 1320 MW in the transmission context; Diamond Transmission Partners describes the OFTO as a 1300 MW connection. Chosen value: 1320 MW as the more specific project figure.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/press-release/ofgem-announces-preferred-bidder-appointed-connection-worlds-biggest-wind-farm-hornsea-2


wind_farm_id: 6738
canonical_id: d487dec5-a53a-4d61-93cd-7bdbf2a9f4e6
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 1 (Breesea)
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: SG 8.0-167 DD
resolved_value: SG 8.0-167 DD
research_value: SG 8.0-167 DD
resolved_fact_id: 35668.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa Hornsea Two order announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Siemens Gamesa’s Hornsea Two order announcement explicitly ties 165 SG 8.0-167 DD turbines to this project. This also matches the linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata.


wind_farm_id: 6738
canonical_id: d487dec5-a53a-4d61-93cd-7bdbf2a9f4e6
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 1 (Breesea)
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens Gamesa
resolved_value: Siemens Gamesa
research_value: Siemens Gamesa
resolved_fact_id: 9148.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Siemens Gamesa Hornsea Two order announcement
research_source_type: OEM press release
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific Siemens Gamesa and DEME sources both tie Siemens Gamesa turbines directly to Hornsea Two.


wind_farm_id: 6738
canonical_id: d487dec5-a53a-4d61-93cd-7bdbf2a9f4e6
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 1 (Breesea)
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 8
resolved_value: 8
research_value: 8 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9458.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: DEME final foundation installation release
research_source_type: contractor press release
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Siemens Gamesa and DEME both explicitly describe 8 MW turbines for Hornsea Two. This matches the linked EuroWindWakes fallback row.

research_source_url:
https://www.deme-group.com/news/deme-offshore-installs-final-foundation-hornsea-two-offshore-wind-farm


wind_farm_id: 6738
canonical_id: d487dec5-a53a-4d61-93cd-7bdbf2a9f4e6
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 1 (Breesea)
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 167
resolved_value: 167
research_value: 167 m
resolved_fact_id: 9613.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Siemens Gamesa Hornsea Two order announcement
research_source_type: OEM press release
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Siemens Gamesa’s project-specific Hornsea Two order states the turbine has a 167 metres rotor diameter. This matches the linked EuroWindWakes fallback row.


wind_farm_id: 6738
canonical_id: d487dec5-a53a-4d61-93cd-7bdbf2a9f4e6
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 1 (Breesea)
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 120
resolved_value: 120
research_value: 120 m
resolved_fact_id: 9768.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific accessible web sources reviewed did not clearly state hub height for Hornsea Two, so the required linked EuroWindWakes fallback was used: 120 m. This was not inferred from a generic turbine page.


wind_farm_id: 6738
canonical_id: d487dec5-a53a-4d61-93cd-7bdbf2a9f4e6
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 1 (Breesea)
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 55
resolved_value: 55
research_value: 165
resolved_fact_id: 47153.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 55 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Ørsted full operation announcement
research_source_type: developer press release
research_source_url: https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2022/08/20220831559011
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
As-built project sources consistently state 165 turbines. This differs from the database row metadata and EMODnet hint of 300, but that higher figure aligns with the original consent envelope rather than the built project. The web-sourced as-built figure therefore resolves the ambiguity in favor of 165.


wind_farm_id: 6738
canonical_id: d487dec5-a53a-4d61-93cd-7bdbf2a9f4e6
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 1 (Breesea)
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 16/08/2016
resolved_value: 16/08/2016
research_value: 16/08/2016
resolved_fact_id: 35675.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Planning Inspectorate non-material change decision
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010053-002177-Final-%20DL%20-%20NMC%20Hornsea%20Two%20Offshore%20Wind%20Farm%20Order.pdf

research_summary:
Planning Inspectorate and GOV.UK both state Hornsea Project Two was granted development consent on 16 August 2016.


wind_farm_id: 6738
canonical_id: d487dec5-a53a-4d61-93cd-7bdbf2a9f4e6
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 1 (Breesea)
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/06/2018
resolved_value: 01/06/2018
research_value: 01/06/2018
resolved_fact_id: 35676.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa Hornsea Two order announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Open-access authoritative FID wording is hard to source. The clearest project-specific marker is Siemens Gamesa’s 28/06/2018 announcement that the turbine order had been officially signed and Ørsted had kicked off the project. Following the user’s partial-date rule, month-level evidence is normalized here as 01/06/2018.


wind_farm_id: 6738
canonical_id: d487dec5-a53a-4d61-93cd-7bdbf2a9f4e6
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 2 - Phase 1 (Breesea)
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2022-08-01
resolved_value: 2022-08-01
research_value: 31/08/2022
resolved_fact_id: 9923.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Ørsted full operation announcement
research_source_type: developer press release
research_source_url: https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2022/08/20220831559011
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Ørsted announced on 31/08/2022 that Hornsea 2 enters full operation, which is the strongest accessible evidence for full commissioning / commercial operation.


wind_farm_id: 6761
canonical_id: 5c7aba12-2f81-441a-acdf-4d9b14197ece
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Nord Est
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Bretagne Nord-Est (BNE)
research_value: Bretagne Nord-Est (BNE)
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-namo
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer NAMO concertation page
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-namo
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current web sources support BNE as a named offshore wind planning/development zone identified by the French State after the 2023–2024 “La mer en débat” process, not a built standalone wind farm. The exact target identity matches the provided core-row name; no evidence was found that BNE has been awarded to a developer or converted into a separate project company.


wind_farm_id: 6761
canonical_id: 5c7aba12-2f81-441a-acdf-4d9b14197ece
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Nord Est
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-namo
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer NAMO concertation page
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-namo
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No current web source identified a project-specific developer, owner, operator, or equity split for BNE. The freshest official sources dated 20/03/2025 and 31/12/2025 describe BNE as a State-defined zone still under concertation before a future tender, so ownership is not yet allocated.


wind_farm_id: 6761
canonical_id: 5c7aba12-2f81-441a-acdf-4d9b14197ece
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Nord Est
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DREAL Bretagne article
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.bretagne.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/bretagne-nord-2-zones-prioritaires-identifiees-a6197.html?lang=fr

research_summary:
No ownership history is evidenced because BNE remains pre-tender. Freshest official source date relied on: DREAL Bretagne page published 31/12/2025 confirms the State is still pursuing studies and concertation before tendering; Eoliennes en mer page dated 20/03/2025 likewise presents BNE as an indicative consultation zone.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.bretagne.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/bretagne-nord-2-zones-prioritaires-identifiees-a6197.html?lang=fr


wind_farm_id: 6761
canonical_id: 5c7aba12-2f81-441a-acdf-4d9b14197ece
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Nord Est
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Concept
resolved_value: Concept
research_value: Concept
resolved_fact_id: 42482.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-namo
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer NAMO concertation page
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-namo
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Best fit is Concept. Official sources show BNE is still a “zone indicative de poursuite de la concertation” / future tender area, with no project-specific consent application yet submitted and no awarded developer. That is earlier than Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning or In Planning / Consent Application Submitted.


wind_farm_id: 6761
canonical_id: 5c7aba12-2f81-441a-acdf-4d9b14197ece
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Nord Est
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2000 MW
resolved_value: 2000 MW
research_value: 2000 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42483.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DREAL Bretagne article
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.bretagne.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/bretagne-nord-2-zones-prioritaires-identifiees-a6197.html?lang=fr

research_summary:
Multiple public sources support about 2 GW for BNE. DREAL Bretagne states Bretagne Nord-Est (BNE) : 2 GW; the Observatoire states puissance totale prévue est de 2000 MW; Légifrance states un projet d'environ 2 GW.


wind_farm_id: 6761
canonical_id: 5c7aba12-2f81-441a-acdf-4d9b14197ece
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Nord Est
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-namo
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer NAMO concertation page
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-namo
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible official source found a project-specific MEC distinct from planned installed capacity. Accessible government pages support only planned capacity and future competitive-procedure steps for BNE, not a formal MEC value.


wind_farm_id: 6761
canonical_id: 5c7aba12-2f81-441a-acdf-4d9b14197ece
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Nord Est
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-namo
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer NAMO concertation page
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-namo
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided, and no project-specific web source confirms a turbine model for BNE. One government report mentions éolien posé in a 2024 planning description, but no awarded project-specific turbine selection exists yet.


wind_farm_id: 6761
canonical_id: 5c7aba12-2f81-441a-acdf-4d9b14197ece
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Nord Est
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-namo
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer NAMO concertation page
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-namo
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific OEM is confirmed; BNE is still pre-tender and no linked EuroWindWakes fallback exists.


wind_farm_id: 6761
canonical_id: 5c7aba12-2f81-441a-acdf-4d9b14197ece
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Nord Est
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-namo
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer NAMO concertation page
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-namo
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific turbine rating is confirmed; BNE remains a planning zone and no linked EuroWindWakes fallback exists.


wind_farm_id: 6761
canonical_id: 5c7aba12-2f81-441a-acdf-4d9b14197ece
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Nord Est
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-namo
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer NAMO concertation page
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-namo
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific rotor diameter is confirmed; BNE remains pre-tender and no linked EuroWindWakes fallback exists.


wind_farm_id: 6761
canonical_id: 5c7aba12-2f81-441a-acdf-4d9b14197ece
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Nord Est
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-namo
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer NAMO concertation page
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-namo
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific hub height is confirmed; BNE remains pre-tender and no linked EuroWindWakes fallback exists.


wind_farm_id: 6761
canonical_id: 5c7aba12-2f81-441a-acdf-4d9b14197ece
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Nord Est
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 8908.0
resolved_source_type: emodnet
resolved_source_name: EMODnet Human Activities
resolved_source_detail: EMODnet Jan 2026
citation_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMODnet Human Activities
source_of_record_type: public data portal
source_of_record_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
source_of_record_licence: Free and open public portal
research_source_name: Eoliennes en mer NAMO concertation page
research_source_type: official project/government webpage
research_source_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-namo
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
No official BNE-specific turbine count was confirmed. The non-web validation signal of 0 from EMODnet does not align with the clear 2 GW planning concept, but that likely reflects an unbuilt concept/development-zone record rather than a physical turbine layout. A BNO presentation PDF lists 110 éoliennes for BNO only and must not be transferred to BNE.


wind_farm_id: 6761
canonical_id: 5c7aba12-2f81-441a-acdf-4d9b14197ece
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Nord Est
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Rapport des maîtres d'ouvrage September 2024 PDF
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/sites/eoliennesenmer/files/inline-files/Rapport%20MO_sep2024-A4-10_17.pdf

research_summary:
Foundations are not confirmed. A 2024 state report describes BNE planning assumptions as éolien posé, but because BNE is still a planning zone without awarded project design, foundation type is not yet project-specifically fixed.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/sites/eoliennesenmer/files/inline-files/Rapport%20MO_sep2024-A4-10_17.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6761
canonical_id: 5c7aba12-2f81-441a-acdf-4d9b14197ece
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Nord Est
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-namo
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer NAMO concertation page
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-namo
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project consent for BNE was found. Accessible official sources describe BNE as a zone still under concertation and to be refined before launch of a competitive procedure, not as a project with granted development consent.


wind_farm_id: 6761
canonical_id: 5c7aba12-2f81-441a-acdf-4d9b14197ece
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Nord Est
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DREAL Bretagne article
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No first power date exists because BNE is still a concept/planning zone. Official sources instead indicate a service horizon around 2040.


wind_farm_id: 6761
canonical_id: 5c7aba12-2f81-441a-acdf-4d9b14197ece
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Nord Est
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Observatoire de l'environnement en Bretagne article
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://bretagne-environnement.fr/thematique/energie/article/energie-renouvelable-eolien-terrestre-mer-bretagne

research_summary:
No full commissioning date exists because BNE is still a concept/planning zone. Public planning sources indicate an expected service horizon of 2040 only.

source_of_record_url:
https://bretagne-environnement.fr/thematique/energie/article/energie-renouvelable-eolien-terrestre-mer-bretagne


wind_farm_id: 6764
canonical_id: b790b840-b660-46da-8271-de467a58e5ad
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Nord Ouest
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Bretagne Nord-Ouest (BNO); future AO10 floating offshore wind project area off northern Brittany
research_value: Bretagne Nord-Ouest (BNO); future AO10 floating offshore wind project area off northern Brittany
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer – Bretagne Nord Ouest
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/facades-maritimes-en-france/facade-nord-atlantique-manche-ouest/bretagne-nord/ouest

research_summary:
Current authoritative French state sources consistently identify the target as Bretagne Nord-Ouest (BNO). The evidence supports a project zone / future tender area, not an already-awarded wind farm with a named SPV. This matches the exact target identity and avoids substituting another Brittany project.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/facades-maritimes-en-france/facade-nord-atlantique-manche-ouest/bretagne-nord/ouest


wind_farm_id: 6764
canonical_id: b790b840-b660-46da-8271-de467a58e5ad
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Nord Ouest
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 42486.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer – Bretagne Nord Ouest
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Not yet awarded; French State is leading planning/tender preparation. Current owner(s): Not confirmed. Equity partners / shares: Not confirmed. Operator: Not confirmed.

resolved_value:
Developer: Not yet awarded; French State is leading planning/tender preparation. Current owner(s): Not confirmed. Equity partners / shares: Not confirmed. Operator: Not confirmed.

citation_url:
https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/facades-maritimes-en-france/facade-nord-atlantique-manche-ouest/bretagne-nord/ouest

research_summary:
No project-specific owner consortium is confirmed because the area is still in state-led planning / pre-tender. The freshest owner-related evidence relied on is the DREAL Bretagne page published 31/12/2025 and the project page stating the State will include the zone in AO10 to award it to future developer(s).


wind_farm_id: 6764
canonical_id: b790b840-b660-46da-8271-de467a58e5ad
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Nord Ouest
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DREAL Bretagne
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
No private project company or equity ownership history confirmed; project remains in public planning / concertation phase before AO10 award

research_value:
No private project company or equity ownership history confirmed; project remains in public planning / concertation phase before AO10 award

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on: 31/12/2025. Web sources support that BNO is still a state-planned future tender area; they do not confirm a transferred ownership history, JV, or percentages.


wind_farm_id: 6764
canonical_id: b790b840-b660-46da-8271-de467a58e5ad
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Nord Ouest
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Concept
resolved_value: Concept
research_value: Concept
resolved_fact_id: 42487.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/sites/eoliennesenmer/files/inline-files/2025_05_presentation_BNO.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Projet de parc éolien en Bretagne Nord-Ouest presentation
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/sites/eoliennesenmer/files/inline-files/2025_05_presentation_BNO.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Although the area is advanced in consultation, there is still no awarded developer, project consent, or project-specific application by a selected promoter. The closest Boundary Layer label is Concept: official sources describe concertation and studies before AO10, with the tender still to be launched.


wind_farm_id: 6764
canonical_id: b790b840-b660-46da-8271-de467a58e5ad
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Nord Ouest
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2,000 MW planned
resolved_value: 2,000 MW planned
research_value: 2,000 MW planned
resolved_fact_id: 42488.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DREAL Bretagne
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Multiple current public sources support about 2 GW for BNO. One consultation source notes power could be updated but “not below 1.2 GW”; the newer project presentation and DREAL end-2025 article both frame BNO as 2 GW.


wind_farm_id: 6764
canonical_id: b790b840-b660-46da-8271-de467a58e5ad
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Nord Ouest
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2,000 MW not confirmed as MEC
resolved_value: 2,000 MW not confirmed as MEC
research_value: 2,000 MW not confirmed as MEC
resolved_fact_id: 42489.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DREAL Bretagne
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Public sources confirm 2 GW raccordables / puissance totale / project size, but I did not find an explicit project-specific source using the term MEC for BNO. Because the sources describe project capacity and grid-connectable capacity rather than a formally labelled MEC, this is kept as Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6764
canonical_id: b790b840-b660-46da-8271-de467a58e5ad
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Nord Ouest
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer – Bretagne Nord Ouest
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No awarded developer or turbine supplier is yet confirmed for BNO, and no linked EuroWindWakes turbine row was provided. Per instruction, turbine-specific fields are left Not confirmed rather than inferred from generic floating-wind assumptions.


wind_farm_id: 6764
canonical_id: b790b840-b660-46da-8271-de467a58e5ad
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Nord Ouest
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer – Bretagne Nord Ouest
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific OEM is confirmed in current web sources; no fallback turbine dataset row exists in the provided context.


wind_farm_id: 6764
canonical_id: b790b840-b660-46da-8271-de467a58e5ad
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Nord Ouest
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-namo
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Débat public & concertation continue
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-namo
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific hub height was found, and there is no linked EuroWindWakes fallback row in the provided context.


wind_farm_id: 6764
canonical_id: b790b840-b660-46da-8271-de467a58e5ad
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Nord Ouest
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 8911.0
resolved_source_type: emodnet
resolved_source_name: EMODnet Human Activities
resolved_source_detail: EMODnet Jan 2026
citation_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMODnet Human Activities
source_of_record_type: public data portal
source_of_record_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
source_of_record_licence: Free and open public portal
research_source_name: DREAL Bretagne
research_source_type: government
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Current web sources describe only a 2 GW floating-wind project area and consultation zone, not a final layout or machine count. This does not align with the database validation signal of 0 turbines as a real project figure; that 0 is most likely a placeholder/outdated dataset value for an unawarded concept-stage zone rather than a confirmed turbine count.

research_source_url:
https://www.bretagne.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/projet-de-parc-eolien-en-bretagne-nord-ouest-l-a5994.html?lang=fr


wind_farm_id: 6764
canonical_id: b790b840-b660-46da-8271-de467a58e5ad
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Nord Ouest
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Floating foundations
resolved_value: Floating foundations
research_value: Floating foundations
resolved_fact_id: 42490.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/politiques-publiques/eolien-mer
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ministry offshore wind page
source_of_record_url: https://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/politiques-publiques/eolien-mer
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The technology is explicitly stated as éoliennes en mer flottantes / flottant in current official sources. Specific floater sub-type is not yet confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6764
canonical_id: b790b840-b660-46da-8271-de467a58e5ad
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Nord Ouest
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-namo
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Débat public & concertation continue
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-namo
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project consent date is confirmed because BNO is still a pre-award planning/tender area rather than a consented project with a selected developer.


wind_farm_id: 6764
canonical_id: b790b840-b660-46da-8271-de467a58e5ad
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Nord Ouest
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/sites/eoliennesenmer/files/inline-files/2025_05_presentation_BNO.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Projet de parc éolien en Bretagne Nord-Ouest presentation
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/sites/eoliennesenmer/files/inline-files/2025_05_presentation_BNO.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No FID is possible to confirm at this stage because no awarded developer / owner vehicle is yet identified.


wind_farm_id: 6764
canonical_id: b790b840-b660-46da-8271-de467a58e5ad
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Nord Ouest
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DREAL Bretagne
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No first-power milestone is confirmed. Sources only indicate an overall target horizon around 2035 for commissioning / service entry.


wind_farm_id: 6764
canonical_id: b790b840-b660-46da-8271-de467a58e5ad
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Nord Ouest
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/01/2035
resolved_value: 01/01/2035
research_value: 01/01/2035
resolved_fact_id: 42491.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/sites/eoliennesenmer/files/inline-files/2025_05_presentation_BNO.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Projet de parc éolien en Bretagne Nord-Ouest presentation
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/sites/eoliennesenmer/files/inline-files/2025_05_presentation_BNO.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Sources indicate mise en service 2035. Because only the year is confirmed, the normalized table date is 01/01/2035 per instruction. This is a target service year, not evidence of actual commissioning.


wind_farm_id: 6766
canonical_id: 7766e998-2da5-4500-a46a-9991300d9af2
wind_farm_name: Fécamp Grand Large
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE – Raccordement des parcs éoliens en mer Fécamp Grand Large 1 et 2
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
FGL (Fécamp-Grand-Large): Not confirmed as a standalone built wind farm; web evidence indicates a future planning zone “Fécamp Grand Large 1 & 2”. Alternative related but distinct project: Parc éolien en mer de Fécamp / Fécamp Offshore Wind Farm

research_value:
FGL (Fécamp-Grand-Large): Not confirmed as a standalone built wind farm; web evidence indicates a future planning zone “Fécamp Grand Large 1 & 2”. Alternative related but distinct project: Parc éolien en mer de Fécamp / Fécamp Offshore Wind Farm

citation_url:
https://www.rte-france.com/projets/nos-projets/raccordement-parcs-eoliens-mer-fecamp-grand-large-1-2

research_summary:
Identity mismatch resolved first: RTE’s current project page refers to “Fécamp Grand Large 1 et 2” as two future 2 GW projects announced on 17/10/2024, whereas the official Fécamp project site refers to the already-built Parc éolien en mer de Fécamp. I therefore treat FGL (Fécamp-Grand-Large) as the planning-zone identity in this research pass, not as the operating Fécamp wind farm.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.rte-france.com/projets/nos-projets/raccordement-parcs-eoliens-mer-fecamp-grand-large-1-2


wind_farm_id: 6766
canonical_id: 7766e998-2da5-4500-a46a-9991300d9af2
wind_farm_name: Fécamp Grand Large
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE – Raccordement des parcs éoliens en mer Fécamp Grand Large 1 et 2
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.rte-france.com/projets/nos-projets/raccordement-parcs-eoliens-mer-fecamp-grand-large-1-2

research_summary:
For the exact target FGL (Fécamp-Grand-Large), I did not find a project-specific official owner/developer page naming a selected developer or ownership split. RTE presents it as a State-announced future zone/raccordement project. Freshest dated source relied on: RTE page citing announcement on 17/10/2024. Built Fécamp owners found on separate sources were not merged because they relate to a different project identity.


wind_farm_id: 6766
canonical_id: 7766e998-2da5-4500-a46a-9991300d9af2
wind_farm_name: Fécamp Grand Large
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE – Raccordement des parcs éoliens en mer Fécamp Grand Large 1 et 2
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No current web source found a reconciled ownership history for the exact target FGL (Fécamp-Grand-Large). Freshest source date relied on: RTE page updated with 2025 public-meeting notices, referring to the 17/10/2024 State announcement. Separate ownership history exists for the built Fécamp project, but that would be a different asset and is not substituted here.


wind_farm_id: 6766
canonical_id: 7766e998-2da5-4500-a46a-9991300d9af2
wind_farm_name: Fécamp Grand Large
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Concept
resolved_value: Concept
research_value: Concept
resolved_fact_id: 42476.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE – Raccordement des parcs éoliens en mer Fécamp Grand Large 1 et 2
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The exact target is best classified as Concept. RTE says the government announced on 17/10/2024 the launch of two new offshore wind farms in the “Fécamp Grand Large” area, with consultation through 2025, authorisation filing planned in H2 2026, works from 2028, and commissioning from 2034. That is earlier than a project-specific consent application decision.


wind_farm_id: 6766
canonical_id: 7766e998-2da5-4500-a46a-9991300d9af2
wind_farm_name: Fécamp Grand Large
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 4,000 MW
resolved_value: 4,000 MW
research_value: 4,000 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42477.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE – Raccordement des parcs éoliens en mer Fécamp Grand Large 1 et 2
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
RTE explicitly states two parks, each 2 GW, for a total planned capacity of 4 GW. This aligns with the supplied EMODnet fallback row capacity of 4000 MW, but unlike the dataset row, web evidence also clarifies that this is a future zone/project pair, not the operating 497–500 MW Fécamp wind farm.


wind_farm_id: 6766
canonical_id: 7766e998-2da5-4500-a46a-9991300d9af2
wind_farm_name: Fécamp Grand Large
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE – Raccordement des parcs éoliens en mer Fécamp Grand Large 1 et 2
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I found planned gross capacity of 2 GW per park from RTE, but no source explicitly stated an MEC value for the exact target. I therefore leave MEC as Not confirmed rather than assuming it equals gross installed capacity.


wind_farm_id: 6766
canonical_id: 7766e998-2da5-4500-a46a-9991300d9af2
wind_farm_name: Fécamp Grand Large
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE – Raccordement des parcs éoliens en mer Fécamp Grand Large 1 et 2
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific turbine selection is confirmed for FGL (Fécamp-Grand-Large). Per instruction, I do not infer turbine specs from the separate built Fécamp project or from generic OEM pages. No EuroWindWakes linked turbine row was provided, so no dataset fallback applies.


wind_farm_id: 6766
canonical_id: 7766e998-2da5-4500-a46a-9991300d9af2
wind_farm_name: Fécamp Grand Large
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE – Raccordement des parcs éoliens en mer Fécamp Grand Large 1 et 2
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific OEM confirmation found for the exact target. Unsupported fields remain Not confirmed because the available turbine evidence online belongs to the different built Fécamp project.


wind_farm_id: 6766
canonical_id: 7766e998-2da5-4500-a46a-9991300d9af2
wind_farm_name: Fécamp Grand Large
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE – Raccordement des parcs éoliens en mer Fécamp Grand Large 1 et 2
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific turbine rating found for FGL (Fécamp-Grand-Large). I do not back-calculate from total capacity because turbine count and turbine model are also unconfirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6766
canonical_id: 7766e998-2da5-4500-a46a-9991300d9af2
wind_farm_name: Fécamp Grand Large
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE – Raccordement des parcs éoliens en mer Fécamp Grand Large 1 et 2
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-tied rotor diameter found for the exact target. I do not infer from any generic turbine platform.


wind_farm_id: 6766
canonical_id: 7766e998-2da5-4500-a46a-9991300d9af2
wind_farm_name: Fécamp Grand Large
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE – Raccordement des parcs éoliens en mer Fécamp Grand Large 1 et 2
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific hub height found for FGL (Fécamp-Grand-Large), and no linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided.


wind_farm_id: 6766
canonical_id: 7766e998-2da5-4500-a46a-9991300d9af2
wind_farm_name: Fécamp Grand Large
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: 0
resolved_fact_id: 42478.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE – Raccordement des parcs éoliens en mer Fécamp Grand Large 1 et 2
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Web sources do not confirm a turbine count yet for the exact target; because the supplied non-web validation signal says the current database winner candidate is 0 and EMODnet hint is 0, I report 0 as the present confirmed-built count for this target area at this stage. This aligns with the validation signals and likely reflects that FGL is still a concept/planning zone with no built turbines yet.


wind_farm_id: 6766
canonical_id: 7766e998-2da5-4500-a46a-9991300d9af2
wind_farm_name: Fécamp Grand Large
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE – Raccordement des parcs éoliens en mer Fécamp Grand Large 1 et 2
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No source found a project-specific foundation choice for the exact target FGL (Fécamp-Grand-Large). I do not carry over the gravity-based foundations of the separate built Fécamp project.


wind_farm_id: 6766
canonical_id: 7766e998-2da5-4500-a46a-9991300d9af2
wind_farm_name: Fécamp Grand Large
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE – Raccordement des parcs éoliens en mer Fécamp Grand Large 1 et 2
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific consent decision found for FGL (Fécamp-Grand-Large). RTE instead indicates consultation through summer 2025 and permit applications in H2 2026, so consent is not yet evidenced.


wind_farm_id: 6766
canonical_id: 7766e998-2da5-4500-a46a-9991300d9af2
wind_farm_name: Fécamp Grand Large
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE – Raccordement des parcs éoliens en mer Fécamp Grand Large 1 et 2
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No first-power milestone exists yet for the exact target; RTE indicates service only from 2034 onward.


wind_farm_id: 6766
canonical_id: 7766e998-2da5-4500-a46a-9991300d9af2
wind_farm_name: Fécamp Grand Large
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RTE – Raccordement des parcs éoliens en mer Fécamp Grand Large 1 et 2
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No full commissioning date found for the exact target; only an indicative RTE schedule of service from 2034 depending on industrial capacity.


wind_farm_id: 6811
canonical_id: 1fdfb12d-7de4-4e1e-88b9-4cd0099a0700
wind_farm_name: Culzean
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.marine.gov.scot/?q=node%2F26455
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate post-consent page
source_of_record_url: https://www.marine.gov.scot/?q=node%2F26455
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Culzean Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Pilot Project; also referred to as Culzean Floating Wind / Culzean floating turbine project

research_value:
Culzean Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Pilot Project; also referred to as Culzean Floating Wind / Culzean floating turbine project

research_summary:
Name ambiguity is resolved in favour of the single-turbine floating wind pilot tied to the Culzean platform. TotalEnergies uses “Culzean floating wind turbine project” and Marine Directorate documents use “Culzean Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Pilot Project”.


wind_farm_id: 6811
canonical_id: 1fdfb12d-7de4-4e1e-88b9-4cd0099a0700
wind_farm_name: Culzean
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35679.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.crownestatescotland.com/scotlands-property/offshore-wind/intog-leasing-round
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Crown Estate Scotland INTOG leasing round page
source_of_record_url: https://www.crownestatescotland.com/scotlands-property/offshore-wind/intog-leasing-round
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: TotalEnergies E&P North Sea UK Limited; Current owner: TotalEnergies E&P North Sea UK Limited; Operator: TotalEnergies E&P North Sea UK Limited

resolved_value:
Developer: TotalEnergies E&P North Sea UK Limited; Current owner: TotalEnergies E&P North Sea UK Limited; Operator: TotalEnergies E&P North Sea UK Limited

research_summary:
Freshest ownership evidence relied on is Crown Estate Scotland’s INTOG page updated with 25/03/2026 lease entry, which shows the lease was entered into with TotalEnergies E&P North Sea UK Limited. TotalEnergies’ 29/08/2024 press release and Marine Directorate filings also identify TotalEnergies/TEPNSUK as project developer. No evidence of equity partners was found; project appears wholly held by TEPNSUK.


wind_farm_id: 6811
canonical_id: 1fdfb12d-7de4-4e1e-88b9-4cd0099a0700
wind_farm_name: Culzean
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Not confirmed beyond apparent sole TotalEnergies / TEPNSUK ownership
research_value: Not confirmed beyond apparent sole TotalEnergies / TEPNSUK ownership
citation_url: https://www.crownestatescotland.com/scotlands-property/offshore-wind/intog-leasing-round
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Crown Estate Scotland INTOG leasing round page
source_of_record_url: https://www.crownestatescotland.com/scotlands-property/offshore-wind/intog-leasing-round
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on is Crown Estate Scotland’s 25/03/2026 lease update. Public sources reviewed show TotalEnergies secured seabed rights through INTOG and progressed to option agreement in 2025 and lease in 2026, but no public evidence was found of any change in equity ownership or percentage split.


wind_farm_id: 6811
canonical_id: 1fdfb12d-7de4-4e1e-88b9-4cd0099a0700
wind_farm_name: Culzean
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Under Construction
resolved_value: Under Construction
research_value: Under Construction
resolved_fact_id: 35680.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: OffshoreWIND news article
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.offshorewind.biz/2024/11/20/foundation-fabrication-kicks-off-for-totalenergies-culzean-pilot-project/

research_summary:
The project moved beyond “Consented”: TotalEnergies announced launch after FID on 29/08/2024; Ocergy said the pilot had entered final engineering and steel cut was imminent following FID; OffshoreWIND reported foundation fabrication had started on 20/11/2024. That supports Under Construction rather than FID Taken, Pre-Construction.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.offshorewind.biz/2024/11/20/foundation-fabrication-kicks-off-for-totalenergies-culzean-pilot-project/


wind_farm_id: 6811
canonical_id: 1fdfb12d-7de4-4e1e-88b9-4cd0099a0700
wind_farm_name: Culzean
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 3 MW
resolved_value: 3 MW
research_value: 3 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35681.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: TotalEnergies press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://totalenergies.com/newsroom/united-kingdom-totalenergies-launches-floating-offshore-wind-pilot-project/

research_summary:
TotalEnergies, Crown Estate Scotland, and Marine Directorate materials consistently describe a single 3 MW turbine project.

source_of_record_url:
https://totalenergies.com/newsroom/united-kingdom-totalenergies-launches-floating-offshore-wind-pilot-project/


wind_farm_id: 6811
canonical_id: 1fdfb12d-7de4-4e1e-88b9-4cd0099a0700
wind_farm_name: Culzean
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/eia_report_chapter_4_-_project_description.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate project description
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/eia_report_chapter_4_-_project_description.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Publicly accessible sources reviewed confirm installed/project capacity of 3 MW, but did not clearly publish a distinct maximum export capacity. Because the turbine is intended to supply the Culzean platform directly rather than a standard grid-export wind farm, no separate MEC value was confirmed from accessible authoritative sources.


wind_farm_id: 6811
canonical_id: 1fdfb12d-7de4-4e1e-88b9-4cd0099a0700
wind_farm_name: Culzean
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas V112
resolved_value: Vestas V112
research_value: Vestas V112
resolved_fact_id: 35682.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://totalenergies.co.uk/media/articles-and-blogs/wind-water-culzean-floating-turbine-project
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: TotalEnergies UK article
source_of_record_url: https://totalenergies.co.uk/media/articles-and-blogs/wind-water-culzean-floating-turbine-project
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific confirmation comes from TotalEnergies’ UK article on the Culzean floating turbine project and Ocergy’s project update, both explicitly tying the V112 to this project.


wind_farm_id: 6811
canonical_id: 1fdfb12d-7de4-4e1e-88b9-4cd0099a0700
wind_farm_name: Culzean
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 3 MW
resolved_value: 3 MW
research_value: 3 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35684.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: TotalEnergies press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://totalenergies.com/newsroom/united-kingdom-totalenergies-launches-floating-offshore-wind-pilot-project/

research_summary:
Repaired to use an openly accessible TotalEnergies source rather than the blocked Ocergy page. TotalEnergies explicitly states the project uses a single 3 MW floating wind turbine.


wind_farm_id: 6811
canonical_id: 1fdfb12d-7de4-4e1e-88b9-4cd0099a0700
wind_farm_name: Culzean
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 112 m
resolved_value: 112 m
research_value: 112 m
resolved_fact_id: 35685.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://totalenergies.co.uk/media/articles-and-blogs/wind-water-culzean-floating-turbine-project
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: TotalEnergies UK article
source_of_record_url: https://totalenergies.co.uk/media/articles-and-blogs/wind-water-culzean-floating-turbine-project
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
TotalEnergies’ UK article states the turbine is a “Vestas V112, which refers to the diameter of the turbine”; that supports 112 m for this project-specific turbine selection. Ocergy corroborates the V112 model.


wind_farm_id: 6811
canonical_id: 1fdfb12d-7de4-4e1e-88b9-4cd0099a0700
wind_farm_name: Culzean
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://totalenergies.co.uk/media/articles-and-blogs/wind-water-culzean-floating-turbine-project
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: TotalEnergies UK article
source_of_record_url: https://totalenergies.co.uk/media/articles-and-blogs/wind-water-culzean-floating-turbine-project
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific accessible source reviewed explicitly stated Culzean’s hub height. Per instruction, this is left as Not confirmed and not inferred from generic V112 specifications or other sites.


wind_farm_id: 6811
canonical_id: 1fdfb12d-7de4-4e1e-88b9-4cd0099a0700
wind_farm_name: Culzean
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1
resolved_value: 1
research_value: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35686.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: TotalEnergies press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Repaired to use accessible authoritative sources that state the project consists of a single floating wind turbine.


wind_farm_id: 6811
canonical_id: 1fdfb12d-7de4-4e1e-88b9-4cd0099a0700
wind_farm_name: Culzean
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Floating semi-submersible floater hull (Ocergy design)
resolved_value: Floating semi-submersible floater hull (Ocergy design)
research_value: Floating semi-submersible floater hull (Ocergy design)
resolved_fact_id: 35687.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: TotalEnergies press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Authoritative project sources describe the foundation/floater as a modular light semi-submersible hull designed by Ocergy; Marine Directorate project documents also describe a semi-submersible Ocergy design.


wind_farm_id: 6811
canonical_id: 1fdfb12d-7de4-4e1e-88b9-4cd0099a0700
wind_farm_name: Culzean
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 22/08/2024
resolved_value: 22/08/2024
research_value: 22/08/2024
resolved_fact_id: 35688.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/marine-licence-applications
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate all applications page
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/marine-licence-applications
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Repaired to use Marine Directorate application-listing data that gives the licence decision date directly for the Culzean marine licence variation.


wind_farm_id: 6811
canonical_id: 1fdfb12d-7de4-4e1e-88b9-4cd0099a0700
wind_farm_name: Culzean
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 29/08/2024
resolved_value: 29/08/2024
research_value: 29/08/2024
resolved_fact_id: 35689.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: TotalEnergies press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Repaired to use the accessible TotalEnergies launch announcement dated 29/08/2024 as the clearest project-owner marker for FID/launch timing.


wind_farm_id: 6811
canonical_id: 1fdfb12d-7de4-4e1e-88b9-4cd0099a0700
wind_farm_name: Culzean
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://totalenergies.com/company/projects/gas/culzean-gas-installation-north-sea-united-kingdom
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: TotalEnergies Culzean project page
source_of_record_url: https://totalenergies.com/company/projects/gas/culzean-gas-installation-north-sea-united-kingdom
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Accessible sources reviewed give an expected operational target by end-2025, but no achieved first-power date has been published in the sources found.


wind_farm_id: 6811
canonical_id: 1fdfb12d-7de4-4e1e-88b9-4cd0099a0700
wind_farm_name: Culzean
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: TotalEnergies press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Accessible sources reviewed state the turbine was expected to be fully operational by end-2025, but no later authoritative commissioning confirmation was found.


wind_farm_id: 6839
canonical_id: 78ff28b7-c110-41ec-a8a8-c131072bc32c
wind_farm_name: EnBW Windpark Baltic 1
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 21
resolved_value: 21
resolved_fact_id: 47155.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: unavailable
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
resolved_source_detail:
Calculated from 21 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations (2 linked turbines also fall within another wind farm geometry)


wind_farm_id: 6848
canonical_id: 4f17146f-1f6f-4581-8bf6-4b25f5778db9
wind_farm_name: Green Volt
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Green Volt Offshore Windfarm; also styled Green Volt / Green Volt Offshore Wind Farm
research_value: Green Volt Offshore Windfarm; also styled Green Volt / Green Volt Offshore Wind Farm
citation_url: https://greenvoltoffshorewind.com/project-overview/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Green Volt project overview
source_of_record_url: https://greenvoltoffshorewind.com/project-overview/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project website, Marine Directorate consent page and developer releases all refer to the same 560 MW floating project east of Aberdeenshire. I found no evidence of a materially different historic project name beyond styling variants.


wind_farm_id: 6848
canonical_id: 4f17146f-1f6f-4581-8bf6-4b25f5778db9
wind_farm_name: Green Volt
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35690.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://flotationenergy.com/onshoreplanningapproval/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Flotation Energy onshore approval release
source_of_record_url: https://flotationenergy.com/onshoreplanningapproval/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Flotation Energy and Vårgrønn; Current owners: Flotation Energy 50%, Vårgrønn 50%; Operator: Green Volt Offshore Windfarm Ltd.

resolved_value:
Developer: Flotation Energy and Vårgrønn; Current owners: Flotation Energy 50%, Vårgrønn 50%; Operator: Green Volt Offshore Windfarm Ltd.

research_summary:
Freshest dated ownership evidence I relied on is the Flotation Energy release dated 04/04/2024, which states “Green Volt is 50% owned by Flotation Energy and 50% by Vårgrønn.” The project site also currently states the two developers are delivering Green Volt. No newer authoritative source found showing a later equity transfer or separate operator entity beyond the project company.


wind_farm_id: 6848
canonical_id: 4f17146f-1f6f-4581-8bf6-4b25f5778db9
wind_farm_name: Green Volt
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://flotationenergy.com/onshoreplanningapproval/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Flotation Energy onshore approval release
source_of_record_url: https://flotationenergy.com/onshoreplanningapproval/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Partnership announced between Flotation Energy and Vårgrønn in 2021; 50/50 ownership explicitly confirmed by 04/04/2024 and no later official change found

research_value:
Partnership announced between Flotation Energy and Vårgrønn in 2021; 50/50 ownership explicitly confirmed by 04/04/2024 and no later official change found

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on is 04/04/2024 from Flotation Energy confirming the 50/50 split. Earlier project history is corroborated by the 2021 partnership announcement and 2023 exclusivity award for Green Volt and Cenos.


wind_farm_id: 6848
canonical_id: 4f17146f-1f6f-4581-8bf6-4b25f5778db9
wind_farm_name: Green Volt
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: FID Taken, Pre-Construction
resolved_value: FID Taken, Pre-Construction
research_value: FID Taken, Pre-Construction
resolved_fact_id: 35691.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://greenvoltoffshorewind.com/planning-and-consent/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Green Volt planning and consent
source_of_record_url: https://greenvoltoffshorewind.com/planning-and-consent/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Green Volt received onshore and offshore consent in April 2024 and secured a 400 MW CfD in September 2024. However, I found no authoritative evidence that project FID itself has already been taken, so the stricter Boundary Layer label would normally be “Consented”; because the permitted list nests FID Taken, Pre-Construction above Consented, I am selecting Consented would be more literal. To avoid misstatement, the evidence-backed interpretation is that the project is consented and pre-construction, with no confirmed project FID yet.


wind_farm_id: 6848
canonical_id: 4f17146f-1f6f-4581-8bf6-4b25f5778db9
wind_farm_name: Green Volt
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 560 MW
resolved_value: 560 MW
research_value: 560 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35692.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://flotationenergy.com/onshoreplanningapproval/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Flotation Energy onshore approval release
source_of_record_url: https://flotationenergy.com/onshoreplanningapproval/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project website and developer release both state Green Volt will provide up to 560 MW. This aligns with the consented project identity in the Scottish Marine Directorate records.


wind_farm_id: 6848
canonical_id: 4f17146f-1f6f-4581-8bf6-4b25f5778db9
wind_farm_name: Green Volt
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 560 MW
resolved_value: 560 MW
research_value: 560 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35693.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://flotationenergy.com/onshoreplanningapproval/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Flotation Energy onshore approval release
source_of_record_url: https://flotationenergy.com/onshoreplanningapproval/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific accessible sources consistently describe Green Volt as an up to 560 MW project, but I did not find an openly accessible authoritative page that separately labels a different “maximum export capacity” value. In the absence of contrary project-specific evidence, the best-supported accessible figure is 560 MW; note that the project separately secured a 400 MW CfD, which is not the same thing as total project MEC.


wind_farm_id: 6848
canonical_id: 4f17146f-1f6f-4581-8bf6-4b25f5778db9
wind_farm_name: Green Volt
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Green Volt application letter
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://greenvoltoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Green-Volt-OWF-Letter-of-Application-20JAN2023.pdf

research_summary:
Project-specific planning documents show a design envelope rather than a fixed as-built selection. The application letter states single WTG capacity of 14 MW to 16 MW, and an aviation appendix discussed candidate turbines including GE Haliade-X 12 MW and Siemens SG 14-222 DD, but those were candidate/reference options, not a confirmed final project turbine model.

source_of_record_url:
https://greenvoltoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Green-Volt-OWF-Letter-of-Application-20JAN2023.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6848
canonical_id: 4f17146f-1f6f-4581-8bf6-4b25f5778db9
wind_farm_name: Green Volt
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Green Volt aviation impacts review appendix
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://greenvoltoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Appendix-16.1-Aviation-Impacts-Review.pdf

research_summary:
No project-specific authoritative source located confirms a final turbine supplier/OEM. Candidate turbines were assessed in planning material, but that is not the same as a final OEM award. Per the instructions, I am not inferring from generic model pages or from another project.

source_of_record_url:
https://greenvoltoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Appendix-16.1-Aviation-Impacts-Review.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6848
canonical_id: 4f17146f-1f6f-4581-8bf6-4b25f5778db9
wind_farm_name: Green Volt
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 16 MW
resolved_value: 16 MW
research_value: 16 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35694.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://greenvoltoffshorewind.com/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Green Volt homepage
source_of_record_url: https://greenvoltoffshorewind.com/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-level sources support a design envelope of 14–16 MW per turbine, while the current project website states the wind farm is “set to deploy up to 35 floating wind turbines” for a 560 MW project; that combination implies 16 MW if built at 35 turbines. However, because the application still allowed 14–16 MW and no final turbine selection is confirmed, this should be treated as a likely maximum/project configuration rather than a fixed as-built turbine rating.


wind_farm_id: 6848
canonical_id: 4f17146f-1f6f-4581-8bf6-4b25f5778db9
wind_farm_name: Green Volt
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Green Volt aviation impacts review appendix
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://greenvoltoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Appendix-16.1-Aviation-Impacts-Review.pdf

research_summary:
The project-specific aviation appendix lists candidate rotor diameters of 220 m and 222 m for candidate turbines, but the same appendix says dimensions are not fixed. No later project-specific authoritative source confirms a final rotor diameter for Green Volt.


wind_farm_id: 6848
canonical_id: 4f17146f-1f6f-4581-8bf6-4b25f5778db9
wind_farm_name: Green Volt
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Green Volt aviation impacts review appendix
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project-specific aviation appendix lists candidate hub heights of 138 m and 133 m for candidate turbines, but also states dimensions are not fixed. No project-specific authoritative source located confirms a final hub height, so I am leaving this as not confirmed rather than inferring from a generic turbine platform.


wind_farm_id: 6848
canonical_id: 4f17146f-1f6f-4581-8bf6-4b25f5778db9
wind_farm_name: Green Volt
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 35
resolved_value: Up to 35
research_value: Up to 35
resolved_fact_id: 35695.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://greenvoltoffshorewind.com/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Green Volt homepage
source_of_record_url: https://greenvoltoffshorewind.com/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The live project website says “up to 35 floating wind turbines,” and project FAQs also refer to “up to 35.” This differs from the provided database validation signal of 0 turbines; that database value is likely a placeholder/outdated status artefact for an unbuilt consented project rather than a web-supported turbine plan.


wind_farm_id: 6848
canonical_id: 4f17146f-1f6f-4581-8bf6-4b25f5778db9
wind_farm_name: Green Volt
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35696.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Green Volt offshore project description PDF
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Floating foundations; specific substructure not confirmed; consent envelope assessed semi-submersible platform, semi-submersible barge, and tension leg platform options

resolved_value:
Floating foundations; specific substructure not confirmed; consent envelope assessed semi-submersible platform, semi-submersible barge, and tension leg platform options

citation_url:
https://greenvoltoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/PC2483-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0005-Project-Description.pdf

research_summary:
Green Volt is clearly a floating offshore wind project. The offshore EIA project description assesses multiple floating substructure options and associated mooring/anchor systems, but I found no later authoritative source confirming the final selected foundation/substructure type for construction.

source_of_record_url:
https://greenvoltoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/PC2483-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0005-Project-Description.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6848
canonical_id: 4f17146f-1f6f-4581-8bf6-4b25f5778db9
wind_farm_name: Green Volt
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 19/04/2024
resolved_value: 19/04/2024
research_value: 19/04/2024
resolved_fact_id: 35697.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate consent page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.marine.gov.scot/ml/section-36-consent-green-volt-offshore-windfarm-east-aberdeenshire-coast

research_summary:
The project website says Green Volt reached consent milestone in April 2024, and the Marine Directorate licence page shows the public notice of EIA decision dated 19/04/2024. I have normalised to the specific day visible on the official marine page.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.marine.gov.scot/ml/section-36-consent-green-volt-offshore-windfarm-east-aberdeenshire-coast


wind_farm_id: 6848
canonical_id: 4f17146f-1f6f-4581-8bf6-4b25f5778db9
wind_farm_name: Green Volt
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://greenvoltoffshorewind.com/project-overview/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Green Volt project overview
source_of_record_url: https://greenvoltoffshorewind.com/project-overview/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I found no authoritative project-specific source confirming that Green Volt has taken final investment decision. Planning documents define the acronym FID, and recent project pages discuss progress and CfD award, but none explicitly state that project FID has occurred.


wind_farm_id: 6848
canonical_id: 4f17146f-1f6f-4581-8bf6-4b25f5778db9
wind_farm_name: Green Volt
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/01/2029
resolved_value: 01/01/2029
research_value: 01/01/2029
resolved_fact_id: 35698.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://greenvoltoffshorewind.com/project-overview/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Green Volt project overview
source_of_record_url: https://greenvoltoffshorewind.com/project-overview/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The current project overview says Green Volt is “targeting first power in 2029.” This is a target rather than a confirmed achieved milestone, so the date is normalised to 01/01/2029 under the year-only rule.


wind_farm_id: 6848
canonical_id: 4f17146f-1f6f-4581-8bf6-4b25f5778db9
wind_farm_name: Green Volt
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://greenvoltoffshorewind.com/project-overview/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Green Volt project overview
source_of_record_url: https://greenvoltoffshorewind.com/project-overview/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No authoritative project-specific source located confirms a final full commissioning date. Sources indicate first power/AR6 delivery timing around 2028/29, but not a specific fully commissioned date.


wind_farm_id: 6849
canonical_id: 05ea7906-c752-4a66-b6cc-4be3d31345c2
wind_farm_name: Aspen
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Aspen Offshore Wind Farm
research_value: Aspen Offshore Wind Farm
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=node%2F26047
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate application page
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=node%2F26047
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official project site uses “Aspen Floating Offshore Windfarm” / “The Aspen Project”, while Marine Directorate uses “Aspen Offshore Wind Farm”. The 2025 EIAR NTS states “Cerulean Winds Aspen Project Limited … Aspen Offshore Wind Farm”.


wind_farm_id: 6849
canonical_id: 05ea7906-c752-4a66-b6cc-4be3d31345c2
wind_farm_name: Aspen
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35751.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://aspen.ceruleanwinds.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/Non-Technical-Summary.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Aspen EIAR Non-Technical Summary
source_of_record_url: https://aspen.ceruleanwinds.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/Non-Technical-Summary.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Cerulean Winds Aspen Project Limited, wholly owned by Cerulean Winds (UKCS) Limited; current owner not evidenced as changed from Cerulean Winds group; operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: Cerulean Winds Aspen Project Limited, wholly owned by Cerulean Winds (UKCS) Limited; current owner not evidenced as changed from Cerulean Winds group; operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
Freshest authoritative ownership evidence located is the August 2025 EIAR NTS, which says the SPV is “wholly owned by Cerulean Winds (UKCS) Limited”. Marine Directorate’s application page names the applicant as Cerulean Winds Aspen Project Limited. No newer dated official source found showing equity sell-down or a separate operator.


wind_farm_id: 6849
canonical_id: 05ea7906-c752-4a66-b6cc-4be3d31345c2
wind_farm_name: Aspen
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Crown Estate Scotland INTOG results
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Cerulean Winds-led project; INTOG TOG seabed rights awarded to Cerulean Winds in 2023; as of August 2025 the Aspen SPV remained wholly owned by Cerulean Winds (UKCS) Limited

research_value:
Cerulean Winds-led project; INTOG TOG seabed rights awarded to Cerulean Winds in 2023; as of August 2025 the Aspen SPV remained wholly owned by Cerulean Winds (UKCS) Limited

citation_url:
https://www.crownestatescotland.com/news/intog-13-projects-selected-to-support-green-innovation-and-help-decarbonise-north-sea

research_summary:
Crown Estate Scotland’s INTOG results identify Cerulean Winds as the lead applicant for a 1,008 MW TOG project. Freshest source date relied on for ownership is the August 2025 EIAR NTS confirming no disclosed ownership split beyond Cerulean Winds group ownership. No official evidence of later transfer found.


wind_farm_id: 6849
canonical_id: 05ea7906-c752-4a66-b6cc-4be3d31345c2
wind_farm_name: Aspen
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
research_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_fact_id: 35752.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=node%2F26047
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate application page
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=node%2F26047
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Marine Directorate lists the Section 36 consent application stage as “Application”, with date of application 31/01/2025 and main application documents submitted 04/09/2025; Cerulean Winds announced submission of offshore consent applications on 10/09/2025. This fits the Boundary Layer label “In Planning / Consent Application Submitted”.


wind_farm_id: 6849
canonical_id: 05ea7906-c752-4a66-b6cc-4be3d31345c2
wind_farm_name: Aspen
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1008 MW
resolved_value: 1008 MW
research_value: 1008 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35753.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Crown Estate Scotland INTOG results
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Crown Estate Scotland INTOG award listing shows Cerulean Winds TOG project capacity of 1008 MW. Aspen project site says the site “will be built out to 1GW capacity”; this aligns with the more precise 1008 MW figure in Crown Estate Scotland and database context.


wind_farm_id: 6849
canonical_id: 05ea7906-c752-4a66-b6cc-4be3d31345c2
wind_farm_name: Aspen
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://aspen.ceruleanwinds.com/technical/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Aspen technical page
source_of_record_url: https://aspen.ceruleanwinds.com/technical/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project site confirms a grid link “via a 220kV HVAC export system” and consultation material says power will be sent to shore and to offshore oil and gas facilities via subsea HVAC cables, but no accessible source found that explicitly states a single project MEC figure distinct from gross/planned installed capacity.


wind_farm_id: 6849
canonical_id: 05ea7906-c752-4a66-b6cc-4be3d31345c2
wind_farm_name: Aspen
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://aspen.ceruleanwinds.com/technical/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Aspen technical page
source_of_record_url: https://aspen.ceruleanwinds.com/technical/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific sources only say Aspen anticipates “18MW turbine units”; no accessible official source reviewed explicitly names a turbine model for Aspen. Per instruction, no model has been inferred from generic OEM product pages.


wind_farm_id: 6849
canonical_id: 05ea7906-c752-4a66-b6cc-4be3d31345c2
wind_farm_name: Aspen
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://aspen.ceruleanwinds.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/Non-Technical-Summary.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Aspen EIAR Non-Technical Summary
source_of_record_url: https://aspen.ceruleanwinds.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/Non-Technical-Summary.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific accessible source explicitly identifies Aspen’s wind turbine OEM. The August 2025 NTS names delivery partners for transmission, foundations, installation and O&M, but not a turbine supplier.


wind_farm_id: 6849
canonical_id: 05ea7906-c752-4a66-b6cc-4be3d31345c2
wind_farm_name: Aspen
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 18 MW
resolved_value: 18 MW
research_value: 18 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35754.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://aspen.ceruleanwinds.com/technical/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Aspen technical page
source_of_record_url: https://aspen.ceruleanwinds.com/technical/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Aspen’s technical summary explicitly states “It is anticipated that 18MW turbine units will be used for the project.” This is project-specific but still phrased as anticipated/planned, appropriate for a project in application stage.


wind_farm_id: 6849
canonical_id: 05ea7906-c752-4a66-b6cc-4be3d31345c2
wind_farm_name: Aspen
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://aspen.ceruleanwinds.com/document-library/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Aspen document library
source_of_record_url: https://aspen.ceruleanwinds.com/document-library/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific web source found that explicitly ties a rotor diameter to Aspen. No EuroWindWakes linked turbine fallback was available in the supplied context, so the field remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6849
canonical_id: 05ea7906-c752-4a66-b6cc-4be3d31345c2
wind_farm_name: Aspen
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://aspen.ceruleanwinds.com/technical/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Aspen technical page
source_of_record_url: https://aspen.ceruleanwinds.com/technical/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific web source found that explicitly states Aspen hub height, and no linked EuroWindWakes turbine row was supplied for fallback. Per instructions, hub height is left Not confirmed rather than inferred from an 18 MW turbine platform.


wind_farm_id: 6849
canonical_id: 05ea7906-c752-4a66-b6cc-4be3d31345c2
wind_farm_name: Aspen
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 56
resolved_value: 56
research_value: 56
resolved_fact_id: 35755.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://aspen.ceruleanwinds.com/technical/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Aspen technical page
source_of_record_url: https://aspen.ceruleanwinds.com/technical/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The planned count implied by 1008 MW / 18 MW is 56, and Aspen’s project-specific source states 18 MW turbines for a ~1 GW project. This differs from the non-web validation signal of 0 turbines, which is most likely because the database row reflects an early/planning-stage dataset placeholder rather than the current consent design envelope.


wind_farm_id: 6849
canonical_id: 05ea7906-c752-4a66-b6cc-4be3d31345c2
wind_farm_name: Aspen
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Floating semi-submersible Tri-Floater
resolved_value: Floating semi-submersible Tri-Floater
research_value: Floating semi-submersible Tri-Floater
resolved_fact_id: 35756.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://aspen.ceruleanwinds.com/technical/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Aspen technical page
source_of_record_url: https://aspen.ceruleanwinds.com/technical/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Aspen technical page says the floating foundation is the “Tri-Floater”. Marine scot search result snippet for the Aspen scoping report identifies “Substructure type NOV-GustoMSC Tri-Floater”. This is project-specific and stronger than relying on generic NOV product literature.


wind_farm_id: 6849
canonical_id: 05ea7906-c752-4a66-b6cc-4be3d31345c2
wind_farm_name: Aspen
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=node%2F26047
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate application page
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=node%2F26047
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Aspen is still in application/determination rather than consented. No consent grant date found; Marine Directorate page remains at application stage.


wind_farm_id: 6849
canonical_id: 05ea7906-c752-4a66-b6cc-4be3d31345c2
wind_farm_name: Aspen
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=node%2F26047
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate application page
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=node%2F26047
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible official source found stating FID has been taken. Current evidence points to pre-consent/application stage.


wind_farm_id: 6849
canonical_id: 05ea7906-c752-4a66-b6cc-4be3d31345c2
wind_farm_name: Aspen
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://aspen.ceruleanwinds.com/aspen-project/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Aspen project page
source_of_record_url: https://aspen.ceruleanwinds.com/aspen-project/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No official source found stating first power. The project page gives Phase 1 COD timing in 2029, but not a first-power milestone.


wind_farm_id: 6849
canonical_id: 05ea7906-c752-4a66-b6cc-4be3d31345c2
wind_farm_name: Aspen
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/01/2029
resolved_value: 01/01/2029
research_value: 01/01/2029
resolved_fact_id: 35782.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://aspen.ceruleanwinds.com/aspen-project/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Aspen project page
source_of_record_url: https://aspen.ceruleanwinds.com/aspen-project/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Aspen project page states “With a Phase 1 Commercial Operation Date in 2029”. Because only the year is explicit, date normalized to 01/01/2029. This should be read as a planned COD target, not achieved commissioning.


wind_farm_id: 6850
canonical_id: 3920f7f0-8722-4ae6-90df-c997ad3f6fe4
wind_farm_name: Salamander
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/offshore_planning_statement.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate Offshore Planning Statement
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/offshore_planning_statement.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Salamander Offshore Wind Farm; also referred to as the Salamander Project / Salamander floating wind project

research_value:
Salamander Offshore Wind Farm; also referred to as the Salamander Project / Salamander floating wind project

research_summary:
Project-specific sources consistently describe Salamander as a proposed 100 MW floating offshore wind farm about 35 km off Peterhead. Marine Directorate application documents use the formal name Salamander Offshore Wind Farm; the project website also uses The Salamander Project.


wind_farm_id: 6850
canonical_id: 3920f7f0-8722-4ae6-90df-c997ad3f6fe4
wind_farm_name: Salamander
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35757.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Salamander/Odfjell ownership press release 26/08/2025
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Salamander Wind Project Company Ltd. Current owners: Odfjell Oceanwind, Simply Blue Group, Subsea7. Operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: Salamander Wind Project Company Ltd. Current owners: Odfjell Oceanwind, Simply Blue Group, Subsea7. Operator: Not confirmed

citation_url:
https://salamanderfloatingwind.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Salamander-PR-Odfjell-Oceanwind-acquires-Orsteds-shares-in-the-Salamander-Offshore-Wind-Farm.pdf

research_summary:
The April 2024 Offshore Planning Statement says the applicant/developer is Salamander Wind Project Company Ltd, then a JV between Ørsted, Simply Blue Group and Subsea7. The freshest ownership source relied on is dated 26/08/2025, when the project/Odfjell release confirmed Odfjell Oceanwind acquired Ørsted’s 80% share and that the remaining shareholders are Simply Blue Group and Subsea7. No current official source found that clearly states the operator.

source_of_record_url:
https://salamanderfloatingwind.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Salamander-PR-Odfjell-Oceanwind-acquires-Orsteds-shares-in-the-Salamander-Offshore-Wind-Farm.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6850
canonical_id: 3920f7f0-8722-4ae6-90df-c997ad3f6fe4
wind_farm_name: Salamander
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Subsea7 / Ørsted announcement 06/04/2022
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Established by Simply Blue Group; Ørsted acquired 80% in 2022; Odfjell Oceanwind acquired Ørsted’s 80% stake on 26/08/2025

research_value:
Established by Simply Blue Group; Ørsted acquired 80% in 2022; Odfjell Oceanwind acquired Ørsted’s 80% stake on 26/08/2025

citation_url:
https://www.subsea7.com/en/media/company-news/2022/orsted-acquires-majority-stake-in-scottish-floating-wind-develop.html

research_summary:
Ownership evolution is well evidenced: Subsea7’s 06/04/2022 release says Ørsted will own an 80% stake; the freshest dated ownership evidence relied on is 26/08/2025, when Odfjell Oceanwind said it had completed acquisition of Ørsted’s 80% share. Current percentages for Simply Blue Group and Subsea7 were not confirmed in accessible official sources, so the full current split cannot be reconciled with certainty.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.subsea7.com/en/media/company-news/2022/orsted-acquires-majority-stake-in-scottish-floating-wind-develop.html


wind_farm_id: 6850
canonical_id: 3920f7f0-8722-4ae6-90df-c997ad3f6fe4
wind_farm_name: Salamander
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Consented
resolved_value: Consented
research_value: Consented
resolved_fact_id: 35758.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Salamander offshore consent press release 24/07/2025
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://salamanderfloatingwind.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Salamander_Press-Release_Offshore-s-36-consent-award-240725.pdf

research_summary:
Offshore consent was granted on 24/07/2025: Marine Directorate records show the Section 36 consent documentation dated 24/07/2025, and the project press release says Salamander has been awarded Section 36 Consent and associated Marine Licences. Crown Estate Scotland’s INTOG page also says Salamander entered an Option Agreement on 22/08/2025 following the July consent. This is best classified as Consented rather than FID Taken, Pre-Construction because no FID was confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://salamanderfloatingwind.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Salamander_Press-Release_Offshore-s-36-consent-award-240725.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6850
canonical_id: 3920f7f0-8722-4ae6-90df-c997ad3f6fe4
wind_farm_name: Salamander
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 100 MW
resolved_value: 100 MW
research_value: 100 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35759.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/offshore_planning_statement.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate Offshore Planning Statement
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/offshore_planning_statement.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Multiple project-specific and regulatory sources describe Salamander as a 100 MW floating offshore wind project / proposed generating station. This aligns with the database context value.


wind_farm_id: 6850
canonical_id: 3920f7f0-8722-4ae6-90df-c997ad3f6fe4
wind_farm_name: Salamander
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.energyconsents.scot/ApplicationDetails.aspx?T=0&cr=ECU00005201
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Scottish Government Energy Consents Unit case ECU00005201
source_of_record_url: https://www.energyconsents.scot/ApplicationDetails.aspx?T=0&cr=ECU00005201
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The accessible offshore planning/EIA sources reviewed confirm project capacity and offshore/onshore components, but no clearly stated project MEC value was found. The Energy Consents Unit page refers instead to the onshore Energy Balancing Infrastructure having import/export capacity of up to 180 MW, which is not the offshore wind farm MEC and therefore should not be used as the project MEC.


wind_farm_id: 6850
canonical_id: 3920f7f0-8722-4ae6-90df-c997ad3f6fe4
wind_farm_name: Salamander
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Salamander Project Description
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://salamanderfloatingwind.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/offshore-wind-pdf/ER.A.2.4%20Project%20Description.pdf

research_summary:
Project-specific documents deliberately keep the turbine choice open within a design envelope. The April 2024 Project Description states the EIA is not linked directly to WTG capacity, and no project-specific source found names a turbine model. Per instruction, no model is inferred from generic platform material.

source_of_record_url:
https://salamanderfloatingwind.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/offshore-wind-pdf/ER.A.2.4%20Project%20Description.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6850
canonical_id: 3920f7f0-8722-4ae6-90df-c997ad3f6fe4
wind_farm_name: Salamander
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Salamander/Odfjell ownership press release 26/08/2025
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://salamanderfloatingwind.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Salamander-PR-Odfjell-Oceanwind-acquires-Orsteds-shares-in-the-Salamander-Offshore-Wind-Farm.pdf

research_summary:
No accessible project-specific official or regulatory source located during this search names the turbine OEM. Odfjell’s 2025 statement says the chosen foundation is for 15MW+ WTGs, but does not identify the turbine supplier for Salamander.


wind_farm_id: 6850
canonical_id: 3920f7f0-8722-4ae6-90df-c997ad3f6fe4
wind_farm_name: Salamander
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Salamander/Odfjell ownership press release 26/08/2025
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No site-specific turbine rating is fixed in the accessible consent/EIA material. The consent envelope allows up to seven turbines for a 100 MW project, and Odfjell says its chosen floating foundation is for 15 MW+ WTGs, but that does not confirm Salamander’s final turbine rating.


wind_farm_id: 6850
canonical_id: 3920f7f0-8722-4ae6-90df-c997ad3f6fe4
wind_farm_name: Salamander
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Salamander Project Description
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://salamanderfloatingwind.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/offshore-wind-pdf/ER.A.2.4%20Project%20Description.pdf

research_summary:
The project-specific EIA uses a design envelope and confirms that physical dimensions such as rotor diameter will drive assessment, but no final rotor diameter explicitly tied to Salamander’s selected turbine was found in accessible sources reviewed here.


wind_farm_id: 6850
canonical_id: 3920f7f0-8722-4ae6-90df-c997ad3f6fe4
wind_farm_name: Salamander
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://salamanderfloatingwind.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/ER.A.1.1-Non-Technical-Summary.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Salamander Non-Technical Summary
source_of_record_url: https://salamanderfloatingwind.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/ER.A.1.1-Non-Technical-Summary.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific source located in this search explicitly confirms Salamander’s turbine hub height. Because no linked EuroWindWakes turbine row was provided for fallback, the correct treatment is Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6850
canonical_id: 3920f7f0-8722-4ae6-90df-c997ad3f6fe4
wind_farm_name: Salamander
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 7
resolved_value: Up to 7
research_value: Up to 7
resolved_fact_id: 35760.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/offshore_planning_statement.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate Offshore Planning Statement
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/offshore_planning_statement.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Marine Directorate planning and HRA documents both state the offshore array will have up to seven turbines. This differs from the non-web validation signal of 0, which likely reflects that the project is not yet built and some datasets store operating turbines rather than consented maximum count. For a consented project profile, up to 7 is the best web-supported value.


wind_farm_id: 6850
canonical_id: 3920f7f0-8722-4ae6-90df-c997ad3f6fe4
wind_farm_name: Salamander
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Floating semisubmersible steel foundation (Deepsea Star™)
resolved_value: Floating semisubmersible steel foundation (Deepsea Star™)
research_value: Floating semisubmersible steel foundation (Deepsea Star™)
resolved_fact_id: 35761.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Salamander/Odfjell ownership press release 26/08/2025
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The consent/EIA documents keep floating substructure options broad at application stage, including semi-submersible or TLP concepts. The freshest project-specific source is dated 26/08/2025, when Odfjell/Salamander said Salamander has adopted Odfjell Oceanwind’s Deepsea Star™ semisubmersible steel foundation.


wind_farm_id: 6850
canonical_id: 3920f7f0-8722-4ae6-90df-c997ad3f6fe4
wind_farm_name: Salamander
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 24/07/2025
resolved_value: 24/07/2025
research_value: 24/07/2025
resolved_fact_id: 35762.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Salamander offshore consent press release 24/07/2025
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://salamanderfloatingwind.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Salamander_Press-Release_Offshore-s-36-consent-award-240725.pdf

research_summary:
Marine Directorate case records show the Section 36 consent documentation submitted on 24/07/2025, and the project press release dated 24/07/2025 announces that the project has secured offshore consent.


wind_farm_id: 6850
canonical_id: 3920f7f0-8722-4ae6-90df-c997ad3f6fe4
wind_farm_name: Salamander
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://salamanderfloatingwind.com/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Salamander project website
source_of_record_url: https://salamanderfloatingwind.com/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project website shows FID only as an anticipated stage; no dated official source found that a final investment decision has been taken. Given the project is still consented/pre-construction, FID is best left unconfirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6850
canonical_id: 3920f7f0-8722-4ae6-90df-c997ad3f6fe4
wind_farm_name: Salamander
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://salamanderfloatingwind.com/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Salamander project website
source_of_record_url: https://salamanderfloatingwind.com/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No first-power milestone has been reached or officially announced in the accessible sources reviewed. The project remains in the consented stage.


wind_farm_id: 6850
canonical_id: 3920f7f0-8722-4ae6-90df-c997ad3f6fe4
wind_farm_name: Salamander
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://odfjelloceanwind.com/offshore-wind-farm-projects/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Odfjell Oceanwind projects page
source_of_record_url: https://odfjelloceanwind.com/offshore-wind-farm-projects/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No commissioning date has been confirmed in accessible official/regulatory sources. Odfjell’s portfolio page mentions a target COD of 2030, but that is a target rather than a confirmed commissioning milestone.


wind_farm_id: 6856
canonical_id: 9b64ca33-056e-4138-b855-1cb2132411d3
wind_farm_name: Judy
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Judy
research_value: Judy
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Scottish Government offshore wind ambition annex
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Crown Estate Scotland’s December 2024 UK offshore wind project list names the project Judy (INTOG Targeted O&G) and the Scottish Government’s January 2026 offshore wind map lists Judy, Harbour Energy, 15 MW, INTOG Round. No separate newer official project brand was found; “Judy Electrification” appears in third-party cumulative-effects documentation as the same Harbour Energy INTOG project.


wind_farm_id: 6856
canonical_id: 9b64ca33-056e-4138-b855-1cb2132411d3
wind_farm_name: Judy
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35789.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Scottish Government offshore wind ambition annex
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Harbour Energy; current owner(s): Not confirmed; equity partners and ownership percentages: Not confirmed; operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: Harbour Energy; current owner(s): Not confirmed; equity partners and ownership percentages: Not confirmed; operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
The freshest dated public official sources found identify Harbour Energy as lead developer/applicant only. Scottish Government published 28/01/2026 still lists Judy, Harbour Energy, 15 MW, and Crown Estate Scotland’s December 2024 listing shows Harbour Energy as lead developer. No newer official JV, project company, or percentage ownership page was found, so current equity ownership structure should not be inferred from the developer listing alone.


wind_farm_id: 6856
canonical_id: 9b64ca33-056e-4138-b855-1cb2132411d3
wind_farm_name: Judy
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Crown Estate Scotland INTOG results
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
24/03/2023: Harbour Energy announced as successful INTOG applicant; later current ownership transfer history Not confirmed

research_value:
24/03/2023: Harbour Energy announced as successful INTOG applicant; later current ownership transfer history Not confirmed

research_summary:
Crown Estate Scotland’s 24/03/2023 INTOG results announced Harbour Energy among the successful applicants, and later official listings in December 2024 and January 2026 still associate Judy with Harbour Energy. No accessible official source was found showing a transfer, farm-down, or updated JV structure. Freshest ownership-related source relied on: Scottish Government annex published 28/01/2026.


wind_farm_id: 6856
canonical_id: 9b64ca33-056e-4138-b855-1cb2132411d3
wind_farm_name: Judy
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
resolved_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
research_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
resolved_fact_id: 35790.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Scottish Government offshore wind ambition annex
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
This is the closest Boundary Layer status. Crown Estate Scotland’s 24/03/2023 results say successful applicants were offered Exclusivity Agreements and would move to option agreements later. The Scottish Government’s 28/01/2026 map places Judy under Status: Lease Awarded. Marine.gov.scot evidence located for Judy itself remains at pre-application / scoping context rather than a submitted wind consent application, so Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning best fits.


wind_farm_id: 6856
canonical_id: 9b64ca33-056e-4138-b855-1cb2132411d3
wind_farm_name: Judy
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 15 MW
resolved_value: 15 MW
research_value: 15 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35791.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Scottish Government offshore wind ambition annex
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Capacity is consistent across official sources: Crown Estate Scotland December 2024 lists Judy at 15 MW, Scottish Government January 2026 repeats 15 MW, and Crown Estate Scotland’s applicant listing also shows Harbour Energy TOG 15 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6856
canonical_id: 9b64ca33-056e-4138-b855-1cb2132411d3
wind_farm_name: Judy
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.datocms-assets.com/136653/1737366965-owprojectlisting-dec2024.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Crown Estate project listing PDF
source_of_record_url: https://www.datocms-assets.com/136653/1737366965-owprojectlisting-dec2024.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific planning or grid document located an explicit MEC for Judy. The public evidence found only confirms planned project capacity of 15 MW. Because Judy is an INTOG electrification project rather than a standard export-to-grid wind farm, gross capacity should not be assumed equal to MEC without explicit project documentation.


wind_farm_id: 6856
canonical_id: 9b64ca33-056e-4138-b855-1cb2132411d3
wind_farm_name: Judy
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: INTOG applicant listing PDF
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided in the prompt, and no project-specific web source was found confirming a turbine model for Judy. A generic 15 MW turbine should not be inferred.


wind_farm_id: 6856
canonical_id: 9b64ca33-056e-4138-b855-1cb2132411d3
wind_farm_name: Judy
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: INTOG applicant listing PDF
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific source identified an OEM for Judy, and there is no linked EuroWindWakes turbine row in the supplied context.


wind_farm_id: 6856
canonical_id: 9b64ca33-056e-4138-b855-1cb2132411d3
wind_farm_name: Judy
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.datocms-assets.com/136653/1737366965-owprojectlisting-dec2024.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Crown Estate project listing PDF
source_of_record_url: https://www.datocms-assets.com/136653/1737366965-owprojectlisting-dec2024.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific source confirmed turbine rating. Although total project capacity is 15 MW, the number and size of turbines are not confirmed and must not be inferred.


wind_farm_id: 6856
canonical_id: 9b64ca33-056e-4138-b855-1cb2132411d3
wind_farm_name: Judy
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: INTOG applicant listing PDF
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific rotor diameter evidence was found, and no linked EuroWindWakes fallback exists in the prompt.


wind_farm_id: 6856
canonical_id: 9b64ca33-056e-4138-b855-1cb2132411d3
wind_farm_name: Judy
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: INTOG applicant listing PDF
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific hub height source was found, and none was provided via linked EuroWindWakes metadata. Hub height must not be inferred from a turbine platform.


wind_farm_id: 6856
canonical_id: 9b64ca33-056e-4138-b855-1cb2132411d3
wind_farm_name: Judy
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: 0
resolved_fact_id: 35792.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Scottish Government offshore wind ambition annex
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No web source located a project-specific turbine count. Because Judy remains lease-awarded / pre-planning, zero installed turbines is the defensible current project-state value, and this aligns with the supplied non-web validation signals (database winner candidate 0; EMODnet hint 0). This should be read as currently installed turbines, not eventual planned turbine count.


wind_farm_id: 6856
canonical_id: 9b64ca33-056e-4138-b855-1cb2132411d3
wind_farm_name: Judy
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Crown Estate Scotland INTOG results
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Judy is clearly part of the floating-wind-oriented INTOG programme, but no source found explicitly states Judy’s foundation type. Because foundation type is turbine-specific/project-specific, it is left unconfirmed rather than inferred.


wind_farm_id: 6856
canonical_id: 9b64ca33-056e-4138-b855-1cb2132411d3
wind_farm_name: Judy
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Scottish Government offshore wind ambition annex
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific offshore wind consent for Judy was found in accessible regulator or official sources. The available evidence indicates lease-awarded / pre-planning status rather than consented status.


wind_farm_id: 6856
canonical_id: 9b64ca33-056e-4138-b855-1cb2132411d3
wind_farm_name: Judy
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Scottish Government offshore wind ambition annex
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No evidence of FID was found. The project remains at lease-awarded / pre-planning stage in the official Scottish Government pipeline.


wind_farm_id: 6856
canonical_id: 9b64ca33-056e-4138-b855-1cb2132411d3
wind_farm_name: Judy
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Scottish Government offshore wind ambition annex
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No commissioning date evidence was found; project is not under construction or operational in official sources.


wind_farm_id: 6857
canonical_id: df3ffaa4-2cc4-4154-be83-95371f946ab1
wind_farm_name: Talisk Offshore Wind Project
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Talisk Offshore Wind Project
research_value: Talisk Offshore Wind Project
citation_url: https://www.magnoraoffshorewind.com/talisk/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Magnora Offshore Wind project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.magnoraoffshorewind.com/talisk/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Magnora’s project page says the ScotWind N3 award “is named Talisk Offshore Wind”; Scottish Development International uses “Talisk Offshore Wind Farm.” No evidence found of a materially different historic project name beyond “Talisk Floating Offshore Wind Farm” in 2025 scoping materials.


wind_farm_id: 6857
canonical_id: df3ffaa4-2cc4-4154-be83-95371f946ab1
wind_farm_name: Talisk Offshore Wind Project
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35763.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.sdi.co.uk/invest/capital-investment/opportunities/talisk-offshore-wind-farm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Scottish Development International project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.sdi.co.uk/invest/capital-investment/opportunities/talisk-offshore-wind-farm
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Magnora Offshore Wind AS; current owner(s): Not confirmed beyond Magnora Offshore Wind project company / partnership; operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: Magnora Offshore Wind AS; current owner(s): Not confirmed beyond Magnora Offshore Wind project company / partnership; operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
Freshest dated source used is the Scottish Development International page last updated 23/01/2026, which lists the owner as Magnora Offshore Wind and describes Magnora Offshore Wind as owned by Magnora ASA and TechnipFMC. Magnora’s own pages confirm the Magnora–TechnipFMC partnership, but no current project-specific equity split for Talisk itself was found on accessible sources.


wind_farm_id: 6857
canonical_id: df3ffaa4-2cc4-4154-be83-95371f946ab1
wind_farm_name: Talisk Offshore Wind Project
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Crown Estate Scotland offshore wind sector profile
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
2022 award to Magnora Offshore Wind partnership; no later project-level ownership transfer confirmed

research_value:
2022 award to Magnora Offshore Wind partnership; no later project-level ownership transfer confirmed

citation_url:
https://www.crownestatescotland.com/sites/default/files/2023-11/OSW-factsheet-web-sept23-sector-profile.pdf

research_summary:
Crown Estate Scotland sector material lists Talisk with development partners “Magnora, TechnipFMC”; Magnora states it was successful in 2022 for the N3 area. Freshest dated ownership-style confirmation relied on is SDI 23/01/2026; no newer transfer, sell-down, or JV percentage disclosure was found.


wind_farm_id: 6857
canonical_id: df3ffaa4-2cc4-4154-be83-95371f946ab1
wind_farm_name: Talisk Offshore Wind Project
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
resolved_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
research_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
resolved_fact_id: 35764.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Magnora Talisk scoping update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.magnoraoffshorewind.com/2025/04/04/scoping-reports-submitted-a-major-step-towards-environmental-consent-for-talisk/

research_summary:
Talisk has a lease/award basis from ScotWind N3 and, as of April 2025, Magnora said scoping reports had been submitted and a consent application was planned for H1 2027. That means no project-specific consent application had yet been submitted, so the closest exact Boundary Layer label is Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning rather than “In Planning / Consent Application Submitted.”

source_of_record_url:
https://www.magnoraoffshorewind.com/2025/04/04/scoping-reports-submitted-a-major-step-towards-environmental-consent-for-talisk/


wind_farm_id: 6857
canonical_id: df3ffaa4-2cc4-4154-be83-95371f946ab1
wind_farm_name: Talisk Offshore Wind Project
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 495 MW
resolved_value: 495 MW
research_value: 495 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35765.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.magnoraoffshorewind.com/talisk/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Magnora Offshore Wind project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.magnoraoffshorewind.com/talisk/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Consistent across Magnora, SDI, and Crown Estate Scotland sector material. This aligns with the database validation context.


wind_farm_id: 6857
canonical_id: df3ffaa4-2cc4-4154-be83-95371f946ab1
wind_farm_name: Talisk Offshore Wind Project
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.magnoraoffshorewind.com/talisk/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Magnora Offshore Wind project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.magnoraoffshorewind.com/talisk/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Accessible sources confirm planned installed capacity of 495 MW and mention grid connection opportunities, but no project-specific MEC/export-capacity figure was found on open accessible official pages located here.


wind_farm_id: 6857
canonical_id: df3ffaa4-2cc4-4154-be83-95371f946ab1
wind_farm_name: Talisk Offshore Wind Project
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.magnoraoffshorewind.com/talisk/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Magnora Offshore Wind project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.magnoraoffshorewind.com/talisk/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Magnora and SDI both describe a base case of 15 MW turbines, but no project-specific turbine model designation was found. Per instruction, this is left unconfirmed rather than inferred from a generic OEM platform.


wind_farm_id: 6857
canonical_id: df3ffaa4-2cc4-4154-be83-95371f946ab1
wind_farm_name: Talisk Offshore Wind Project
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.sdi.co.uk/invest/capital-investment/opportunities/talisk-offshore-wind-farm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Scottish Development International project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.sdi.co.uk/invest/capital-investment/opportunities/talisk-offshore-wind-farm
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Sources mention supplier engagement is ongoing and a 15 MW base case, but no OEM is explicitly tied to Talisk.


wind_farm_id: 6857
canonical_id: df3ffaa4-2cc4-4154-be83-95371f946ab1
wind_farm_name: Talisk Offshore Wind Project
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 15 MW
resolved_value: 15 MW
research_value: 15 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35766.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.magnoraoffshorewind.com/talisk/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Magnora Offshore Wind project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.magnoraoffshorewind.com/talisk/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Magnora states “15MW turbines as a base case” and 33 turbines; SDI likewise says the planned project will use 33 15 MW turbines. This is still a planned design basis, not a final ordered turbine specification.


wind_farm_id: 6857
canonical_id: df3ffaa4-2cc4-4154-be83-95371f946ab1
wind_farm_name: Talisk Offshore Wind Project
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.magnoraoffshorewind.com/talisk/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Magnora Offshore Wind project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.magnoraoffshorewind.com/talisk/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific rotor diameter was found in accessible sources reviewed. No EuroWindWakes linked turbine metadata was provided in the prompt for fallback, so this remains unconfirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6857
canonical_id: df3ffaa4-2cc4-4154-be83-95371f946ab1
wind_farm_name: Talisk Offshore Wind Project
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.sdi.co.uk/invest/capital-investment/opportunities/talisk-offshore-wind-farm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Scottish Development International project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.sdi.co.uk/invest/capital-investment/opportunities/talisk-offshore-wind-farm
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
SDI mentions wind speed “at hub height” but does not give a numeric hub height. No project-specific hub-height figure was found, and none may be inferred from turbine platform alone.


wind_farm_id: 6857
canonical_id: df3ffaa4-2cc4-4154-be83-95371f946ab1
wind_farm_name: Talisk Offshore Wind Project
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 33
resolved_value: 33
research_value: 33
resolved_fact_id: 35767.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.magnoraoffshorewind.com/talisk/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Magnora Offshore Wind project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.magnoraoffshorewind.com/talisk/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Magnora and SDI both state 33 turbines at 15 MW each. This differs from the non-web validation signal of 0 turbines; the likely reason is that the dataset hint reflects an unbuilt pre-construction site where installed turbines are currently zero, while web sources describe the planned layout.


wind_farm_id: 6857
canonical_id: df3ffaa4-2cc4-4154-be83-95371f946ab1
wind_farm_name: Talisk Offshore Wind Project
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Floating foundation; concrete or steel floater
resolved_value: Floating foundation; concrete or steel floater
research_value: Floating foundation; concrete or steel floater
resolved_fact_id: 35768.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.magnoraoffshorewind.com/talisk/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Magnora Offshore Wind project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.magnoraoffshorewind.com/talisk/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Magnora explicitly says the project uses floating offshore wind “with concrete or steel floater”; SDI repeats “concrete or steel floaters.” Specific floater sub-type was not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6857
canonical_id: df3ffaa4-2cc4-4154-be83-95371f946ab1
wind_farm_name: Talisk Offshore Wind Project
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.magnoraoffshorewind.com/talisk/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Magnora Offshore Wind project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.magnoraoffshorewind.com/talisk/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No consent decision has been issued. Magnora says consent application is planned for early/H1 2027 and target consent is in 2028, so no actual consent date can yet be recorded.


wind_farm_id: 6857
canonical_id: df3ffaa4-2cc4-4154-be83-95371f946ab1
wind_farm_name: Talisk Offshore Wind Project
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.sdi.co.uk/invest/capital-investment/opportunities/talisk-offshore-wind-farm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Scottish Development International project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.sdi.co.uk/invest/capital-investment/opportunities/talisk-offshore-wind-farm
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
SDI says FID is expected shortly after consent if the project receives a CfD award, which indicates FID has not yet been taken.


wind_farm_id: 6857
canonical_id: df3ffaa4-2cc4-4154-be83-95371f946ab1
wind_farm_name: Talisk Offshore Wind Project
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.magnoraoffshorewind.com/talisk/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Magnora Offshore Wind project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.magnoraoffshorewind.com/talisk/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Magnora indicates “Production start in 2030,” but that is a target rather than a completed milestone. No first-power event has occurred.


wind_farm_id: 6857
canonical_id: df3ffaa4-2cc4-4154-be83-95371f946ab1
wind_farm_name: Talisk Offshore Wind Project
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.magnoraoffshorewind.com/talisk/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Magnora Offshore Wind project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.magnoraoffshorewind.com/talisk/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Magnora gives a target “COD in 2031,” but commissioning has not occurred and no binding commissioning date was confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6858
canonical_id: a1af293a-04fc-4d16-9636-6a5d5ff140a7
wind_farm_name: Scaraben
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Scaraben Offshore Wind Farm; also referred to as Scaraben WFDA / Scaraben Project
research_value: Scaraben Offshore Wind Farm; also referred to as Scaraben WFDA / Scaraben Project
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Scottish Government scoping opinion
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific sources consistently describe Scaraben as an INTOG innovation floating offshore wind project off Fraserburgh. Scottish Government scoping documents use “Scaraben Wind Farm Development Area” and “Scaraben Project”; project/developer pages use “Scaraben Offshore Wind Farm”.


wind_farm_id: 6858
canonical_id: a1af293a-04fc-4d16-9636-6a5d5ff140a7
wind_farm_name: Scaraben
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Developer: Nadara. Current owner: Nadara. Operator: Not confirmed
resolved_value: Developer: Nadara. Current owner: Nadara. Operator: Not confirmed
research_value: Developer: Nadara. Current owner: Nadara. Operator: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 35769.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://scarabenwind.co.uk/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Scaraben project website
source_of_record_url: https://scarabenwind.co.uk/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The freshest ownership evidence found is Scaraben’s live project website, which states the project “is being developed by Nadara”, and Scottish Government’s January 2026 offshore wind map, which lists “Scaraben, Nadara, 100MW”. Older 2023 sources show the project was originally under the BlueFloat Energy / Renantis partnership before Nadara branding and later buyout. No separate operator was confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6858
canonical_id: a1af293a-04fc-4d16-9636-6a5d5ff140a7
wind_farm_name: Scaraben
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: BlueFloat Energy press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
19/05/2023: BlueFloat Energy / Renantis partnership held the project; by 01/01/2026 Nadara is presented as project owner/developer

research_value:
19/05/2023: BlueFloat Energy / Renantis partnership held the project; by 01/01/2026 Nadara is presented as project owner/developer

citation_url:
https://www.bluefloat.com/bluefloat-energy-renantis-partnership-signs-exclusivity-agreements-to-develop-its-sinclair-and-scaraben-intog-projects/

research_summary:
BlueFloat Energy’s 19/05/2023 release says the partnership signed exclusivity agreements for Sinclair and Scaraben. The freshest ownership confirmation relied on is the January 2026 Scottish Government offshore wind map plus the live Scaraben site under Nadara branding, indicating Nadara now fronts the project. A precise current equity split was not confirmed from an official project/JV page, so no percentages are stated.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.bluefloat.com/bluefloat-energy-renantis-partnership-signs-exclusivity-agreements-to-develop-its-sinclair-and-scaraben-intog-projects/


wind_farm_id: 6858
canonical_id: a1af293a-04fc-4d16-9636-6a5d5ff140a7
wind_farm_name: Scaraben
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
resolved_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
research_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
resolved_fact_id: 35770.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Crown Estate Scotland INTOG awards
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Crown Estate Scotland confirms Scaraben was selected in INTOG and offered exclusivity; the project website says scoping was submitted in 2024 and that consent applications are planned for mid-2025 to mid-2026. Because a project-specific consent application was not confirmed as submitted, the closest exact Boundary Layer label remains Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning, with nuance that formal scoping has occurred.


wind_farm_id: 6858
canonical_id: a1af293a-04fc-4d16-9636-6a5d5ff140a7
wind_farm_name: Scaraben
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 99.5 MW
resolved_value: 99.5 MW
research_value: 99.5 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35771.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://scarabenwind.co.uk/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Scaraben project website
source_of_record_url: https://scarabenwind.co.uk/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific pages and Scottish Government / scoping material consistently state planned capacity at about 99.5 MW. This is slightly below the database context’s rounded 100 MW and aligns with the INTOG innovation cap.


wind_farm_id: 6858
canonical_id: a1af293a-04fc-4d16-9636-6a5d5ff140a7
wind_farm_name: Scaraben
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Broadshore Hub scoping report
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/240108_-_broadshore_scaraben_and_sinclair_-_eia_scoping_-_scoping_report.pdf

research_summary:
Openly accessible sources reviewed describe installed/planned capacity but do not clearly state a distinct export capacity / MEC for Scaraben. The scoping material notes separate transmission development areas and Peterhead connection assumptions, but no Scaraben-specific MEC figure was found.

source_of_record_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/240108_-_broadshore_scaraben_and_sinclair_-_eia_scoping_-_scoping_report.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6858
canonical_id: a1af293a-04fc-4d16-9636-6a5d5ff140a7
wind_farm_name: Scaraben
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Broadshore Hub scoping report
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/240108_-_broadshore_scaraben_and_sinclair_-_eia_scoping_-_scoping_report.pdf

research_summary:
No project-specific web source identified an actual turbine model for Scaraben. The scoping report only gives a design envelope, not a selected turbine. Per instruction, no inference is made from generic OEM platforms or other projects.


wind_farm_id: 6858
canonical_id: a1af293a-04fc-4d16-9636-6a5d5ff140a7
wind_farm_name: Scaraben
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Broadshore Hub scoping report
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific source names an OEM for Scaraben. The available materials remain at scoping / design-envelope stage only.


wind_farm_id: 6858
canonical_id: a1af293a-04fc-4d16-9636-6a5d5ff140a7
wind_farm_name: Scaraben
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Broadshore Hub scoping report
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The scoping report gives only a WTG design envelope of 15–28 MW, not a chosen turbine rating for Scaraben. No more specific site-tied turbine rating was confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6858
canonical_id: a1af293a-04fc-4d16-9636-6a5d5ff140a7
wind_farm_name: Scaraben
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Broadshore Hub scoping report
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The scoping report gives a Scaraben design envelope with rotor diameter 236–330 m, but no selected turbine or project-specific final rotor value. Therefore rotor diameter is not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6858
canonical_id: a1af293a-04fc-4d16-9636-6a5d5ff140a7
wind_farm_name: Scaraben
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Broadshore Hub scoping report
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific source states Scaraben’s hub height. The scoping report mentions only overall tip-height limits and aviation lighting at hub height, which is insufficient to derive hub height.


wind_farm_id: 6858
canonical_id: a1af293a-04fc-4d16-9636-6a5d5ff140a7
wind_farm_name: Scaraben
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 3–6 planned; 0 currently installed
resolved_value: 3–6 planned; 0 currently installed
research_value: 3–6 planned; 0 currently installed
resolved_fact_id: 35773.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Broadshore Hub scoping report
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The 08/01/2024 scoping report gives a design-envelope count of 3–6 WTGs for Scaraben WFDA. This differs from the database validation signal of 0 because the web sources describe a pre-construction project with no turbines installed yet; thus 0 installed aligns with the validation context, while 3–6 is the current planning envelope.


wind_farm_id: 6858
canonical_id: a1af293a-04fc-4d16-9636-6a5d5ff140a7
wind_farm_name: Scaraben
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Floating substructure; specific type not confirmed
resolved_value: Floating substructure; specific type not confirmed
research_value: Floating substructure; specific type not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 35774.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://scarabenwind.co.uk/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Scaraben project website
source_of_record_url: https://scarabenwind.co.uk/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Scaraben is explicitly described as a floating offshore wind farm. The scoping report lists candidate floating substructure options and mooring systems, but no final foundation/substructure type has been selected.


wind_farm_id: 6858
canonical_id: a1af293a-04fc-4d16-9636-6a5d5ff140a7
wind_farm_name: Scaraben
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://scarabenwind.co.uk/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Scaraben project website
source_of_record_url: https://scarabenwind.co.uk/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No Section 36 consent or marine licence decision date was found. The project remains before consent determination, with consent applications indicated as planned rather than decided.


wind_farm_id: 6858
canonical_id: a1af293a-04fc-4d16-9636-6a5d5ff140a7
wind_farm_name: Scaraben
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://scarabenwind.co.uk/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Scaraben project website
source_of_record_url: https://scarabenwind.co.uk/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No official source found confirming FID. Project materials show early development and scoping, not pre-construction commitment.


wind_farm_id: 6858
canonical_id: a1af293a-04fc-4d16-9636-6a5d5ff140a7
wind_farm_name: Scaraben
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://scarabenwind.co.uk/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Scaraben project website
source_of_record_url: https://scarabenwind.co.uk/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project website indicates only “Commercial operation” in the early 2030s, which is too broad to treat as a confirmed commissioning date; under the date-normalisation rules this remains not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6859
canonical_id: 8bb29a35-cfc9-4b04-8f43-72e6b6ffa8dc
wind_farm_name: Flora
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Flora
research_value: Flora
citation_url: https://www.jnbp.com/project/flora/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: JERA Nex bp project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.jnbp.com/project/flora/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project is referred to as Flora / Flora Offshore Wind Farm in both the developer portfolio and Marine Directorate licensing portal. No well-supported alternative historic project name was found.


wind_farm_id: 6859
canonical_id: 8bb29a35-cfc9-4b04-8f43-72e6b6ffa8dc
wind_farm_name: Flora
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Developer: JERA Nex bp; current owner: JERA Nex bp; operator: Not confirmed
resolved_value: Developer: JERA Nex bp; current owner: JERA Nex bp; operator: Not confirmed
research_value: Developer: JERA Nex bp; current owner: JERA Nex bp; operator: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 35804.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.jnbp.com/project/flora/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: JERA Nex bp project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.jnbp.com/project/flora/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The freshest ownership evidence relied on is the JERA Nex bp project page (live in 2026) confirming Flora “is being developed by JERA Nex bp”, together with bp’s offshore wind page stating Flora was bp’s 2023 bid success and bp/JERA formed JERA Nex bp in December 2024. No project-specific page was found that explicitly breaks out Flora equity percentages, so current owner is stated at JV level only.


wind_farm_id: 6859
canonical_id: 8bb29a35-cfc9-4b04-8f43-72e6b6ffa8dc
wind_farm_name: Flora
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: bp press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
01/03/2023: bp successful in INTOG bid for Flora; 09/12/2024: bp agreed to place Flora into 50:50 JERA Nex bp JV; current project-level split: Not confirmed

research_value:
01/03/2023: bp successful in INTOG bid for Flora; 09/12/2024: bp agreed to place Flora into 50:50 JERA Nex bp JV; current project-level split: Not confirmed

citation_url:
https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/news-and-insights/press-releases/bp-and-jera-joining-forces-to-create-top-tier-global-offshore-wind-business.html

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on is 09/12/2024, when bp and JERA announced the offshore wind JV and listed **“Flora, UK

source_of_record_url:
https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/news-and-insights/press-releases/bp-and-jera-joining-forces-to-create-top-tier-global-offshore-wind-business.html


wind_farm_id: 6859
canonical_id: 8bb29a35-cfc9-4b04-8f43-72e6b6ffa8dc
wind_farm_name: Flora
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
resolved_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
research_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
resolved_fact_id: 35805.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=ml%2Fflora-offshore-wind-farm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate project page
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=ml%2Fflora-offshore-wind-farm
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Marine Directorate lists Flora at “Project stage: Pre-application” and JERA Nex bp says development remains subject to consents and FID. Given the project already won an INTOG award and has not yet reached a project-specific consent application, the closest Boundary Layer label is Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning.


wind_farm_id: 6859
canonical_id: 8bb29a35-cfc9-4b04-8f43-72e6b6ffa8dc
wind_farm_name: Flora
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 50 MW
resolved_value: 50 MW
research_value: 50 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35806.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.jnbp.com/project/flora/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: JERA Nex bp project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.jnbp.com/project/flora/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
JERA Nex bp says Flora is expected to produce approximately 50MW. Scottish Government map appendix also lists Flora, BP Alternative Energy, 50MW, INTOG Round.


wind_farm_id: 6859
canonical_id: 8bb29a35-cfc9-4b04-8f43-72e6b6ffa8dc
wind_farm_name: Flora
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=ml%2Fflora-offshore-wind-farm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate project page
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=ml%2Fflora-offshore-wind-farm
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No openly accessible project-specific source found during research that explicitly states a grid/export/MEC figure distinct from planned generation capacity. The available Marine Directorate page found was an EPS survey licence page rather than a consent application with electrical parameters.


wind_farm_id: 6859
canonical_id: 8bb29a35-cfc9-4b04-8f43-72e6b6ffa8dc
wind_farm_name: Flora
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.jnbp.com/project/flora/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: JERA Nex bp project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.jnbp.com/project/flora/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific authoritative source found that names a turbine model for Flora. Per the brief, turbine details are left Not confirmed rather than inferred from generic floating wind assumptions.


wind_farm_id: 6859
canonical_id: 8bb29a35-cfc9-4b04-8f43-72e6b6ffa8dc
wind_farm_name: Flora
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.jnbp.com/project/flora/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: JERA Nex bp project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.jnbp.com/project/flora/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific authoritative source found for hub height, and it has not been inferred from any generic turbine platform.


wind_farm_id: 6859
canonical_id: 8bb29a35-cfc9-4b04-8f43-72e6b6ffa8dc
wind_farm_name: Flora
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: 0
resolved_fact_id: 35807.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=ml%2Fflora-offshore-wind-farm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate project page
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=ml%2Fflora-offshore-wind-farm
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No web source found that explicitly states a turbine count. Web evidence supports Flora being a pre-application / developing 50 MW project with no consented build-out details yet. That aligns with the provided validation signals showing 0 as the current database winner / EMODnet hint; likely reason is that no turbines are yet consented or installed.


wind_farm_id: 6859
canonical_id: 8bb29a35-cfc9-4b04-8f43-72e6b6ffa8dc
wind_farm_name: Flora
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Floating foundations
resolved_value: Floating foundations
research_value: Floating foundations
resolved_fact_id: 35808.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.jnbp.com/project/flora/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: JERA Nex bp project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.jnbp.com/project/flora/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
JERA Nex bp describes Flora as an innovative demonstrator floating offshore wind project. Scottish Government supporting material also lists IN Flora ... Floating ... 0.05 GW. Specific floater sub-type was not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6859
canonical_id: 8bb29a35-cfc9-4b04-8f43-72e6b6ffa8dc
wind_farm_name: Flora
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EPS licence application page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/?q=data%2Feuropean-protected-species-licence-application-flora-offshore-wind-farm-east-peterhead-00010686

research_summary:
No project-wide Section 36 / marine licence consent date found. The 30/05/2024 Marine Directorate record located relates to an EPS licence application/licence for survey works, not overall project consent.

source_of_record_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/?q=data%2Feuropean-protected-species-licence-application-flora-offshore-wind-farm-east-peterhead-00010686


wind_farm_id: 6859
canonical_id: 8bb29a35-cfc9-4b04-8f43-72e6b6ffa8dc
wind_farm_name: Flora
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.jnbp.com/project/flora/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: JERA Nex bp project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.jnbp.com/project/flora/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
JERA Nex bp explicitly says development remains subject to final investment decision from the shareholders; no FID date was found.


wind_farm_id: 6860
canonical_id: 1b8fc897-393a-46e9-aee8-e658667261ca
wind_farm_name: Malin
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Malin Sea Wind; alternative/historic references: Malin Sea Offshore Wind / Malin Sea Wind project
research_value: Malin Sea Wind; alternative/historic references: Malin Sea Offshore Wind / Malin Sea Wind project
citation_url: https://malinseaoffshorewind.com/home
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Malin Sea Offshore Wind project website
source_of_record_url: https://malinseaoffshorewind.com/home
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project website and ESB pages consistently use Malin Sea Wind / Malin Sea Offshore Wind for the Scottish INTOG project. This resolves the name ambiguity with the unrelated Irish Malin Head Offshore Wind Farm.


wind_farm_id: 6860
canonical_id: 1b8fc897-393a-46e9-aee8-e658667261ca
wind_farm_name: Malin
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35809.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Scottish Government Offshore Wind Ambition Annex A
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: ESB (with technology partners Dublin Offshore Technology and CATAGEN); current owner/operator: Not confirmed beyond ESB project control

resolved_value:
Developer: ESB (with technology partners Dublin Offshore Technology and CATAGEN); current owner/operator: Not confirmed beyond ESB project control

research_summary:
The freshest owner/developer evidence relied on is the gov.scot page published 28/01/2026, which lists “Malin Sea Wind, ESB Asset Development, 100 MW”. ESB’s project and portfolio pages also show ESB holding the development rights. Partner pages describe Dublin Offshore and CATAGEN as collaborators/technology partners, but public sources do not clearly evidence an equity split or a separate operator entity, so ownership percentages are Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6860
canonical_id: 1b8fc897-393a-46e9-aee8-e658667261ca
wind_farm_name: Malin
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Crown Estate Scotland INTOG results
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
24/03/2023: ESB awarded exclusivity agreement under INTOG; no later transfer or revised equity split confirmed

research_value:
24/03/2023: ESB awarded exclusivity agreement under INTOG; no later transfer or revised equity split confirmed

research_summary:
Crown Estate Scotland’s INTOG results page dated 24 March 2023 shows ESB Asset Development UK among applicants offered exclusivity agreements, and the 28/01/2026 gov.scot annex still lists Malin Sea Wind, ESB Asset Development, 100 MW, INTOG Round. No newer public source found confirming any ownership transfer, JV percentages, or operator change.


wind_farm_id: 6860
canonical_id: 1b8fc897-393a-46e9-aee8-e658667261ca
wind_farm_name: Malin
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
resolved_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
research_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
resolved_fact_id: 35810.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.malinseaoffshorewind.com/info
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Malin Sea project information page
source_of_record_url: https://www.malinseaoffshorewind.com/info
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Crown Estate Scotland confirms the INTOG award to ESB, and the project website says the team is in early planning with a planning application in 2026 on its published timeline. The project does not yet show a project-specific consent application or consent decision, so the closest exact Boundary Layer label is Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning.


wind_farm_id: 6860
canonical_id: 1b8fc897-393a-46e9-aee8-e658667261ca
wind_farm_name: Malin
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 100 MW
resolved_value: 100 MW
research_value: 100 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35811.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://malinseaoffshorewind.com/home
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Malin Sea Offshore Wind project website
source_of_record_url: https://malinseaoffshorewind.com/home
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Multiple authoritative/project-specific sources state the project is designed to deliver 100 MW of floating offshore wind capacity. This is slightly above the 96 MW database context, but the live project and Scottish government sources consistently say 100 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6860
canonical_id: 1b8fc897-393a-46e9-aee8-e658667261ca
wind_farm_name: Malin
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.malinseaoffshorewind.com/info
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Malin Sea project information page
source_of_record_url: https://www.malinseaoffshorewind.com/info
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible authoritative source found that explicitly states a grid/export MEC distinct from the planned 100 MW installed capacity.


wind_farm_id: 6860
canonical_id: 1b8fc897-393a-46e9-aee8-e658667261ca
wind_farm_name: Malin
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.malinseaoffshorewind.com/info
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Malin Sea project information page
source_of_record_url: https://www.malinseaoffshorewind.com/info
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific source located that names a turbine model for Malin Sea Wind. Per instruction, turbine model is left Not confirmed and not inferred from generic floating-wind technology pages.


wind_farm_id: 6860
canonical_id: 1b8fc897-393a-46e9-aee8-e658667261ca
wind_farm_name: Malin
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Scotland Malin Sea Wind survey document
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/mc00001_malin_sea_wind_rev05_with_appendices_redacted_0.pdf

research_summary:
No project-specific source explicitly confirms individual turbine rating. The survey document excerpt indicates only “circa 6 turbines” for a 100 MW project, but does not name a final turbine rating.

source_of_record_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/mc00001_malin_sea_wind_rev05_with_appendices_redacted_0.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6860
canonical_id: 1b8fc897-393a-46e9-aee8-e658667261ca
wind_farm_name: Malin
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.malinseaoffshorewind.com/info
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Malin Sea project information page
source_of_record_url: https://www.malinseaoffshorewind.com/info
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific source explicitly confirms hub height, and no linked EuroWindWakes fallback was provided for this project.


wind_farm_id: 6860
canonical_id: 1b8fc897-393a-46e9-aee8-e658667261ca
wind_farm_name: Malin
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed (development concept references circa 6 turbines)
resolved_value: Not confirmed (development concept references circa 6 turbines)
research_value: Not confirmed (development concept references circa 6 turbines)
resolved_fact_id: 35812.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Scotland Malin Sea Wind survey document
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/mc00001_malin_sea_wind_rev05_with_appendices_redacted_0.pdf

research_summary:
The strongest project-specific web source found is the Marine Scotland survey document excerpt, which says the project is aiming for 100 MW generating capacity from circa 6 turbines. However, live project pages do not lock in a final turbine count, so the field remains Not confirmed. This differs from the database validation signal of 0, which likely reflects pre-planning/dataset placeholder treatment rather than a project concept count.


wind_farm_id: 6860
canonical_id: 1b8fc897-393a-46e9-aee8-e658667261ca
wind_farm_name: Malin
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Floating foundations; specific substructure type not confirmed
resolved_value: Floating foundations; specific substructure type not confirmed
research_value: Floating foundations; specific substructure type not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 35813.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://malinseaoffshorewind.com/home
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Malin Sea Offshore Wind project website
source_of_record_url: https://malinseaoffshorewind.com/home
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project pages repeatedly describe Malin Sea Wind as a floating offshore wind project, but no accessible source found that confirms whether the floater is semi-submersible, spar, TLP, or another specific design.


wind_farm_id: 6860
canonical_id: 1b8fc897-393a-46e9-aee8-e658667261ca
wind_farm_name: Malin
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.malinseaoffshorewind.com/info
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Malin Sea project information page
source_of_record_url: https://www.malinseaoffshorewind.com/info
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific Section 36 / marine consent date found, and available evidence indicates the project remains pre-application / early planning.


wind_farm_id: 6860
canonical_id: 1b8fc897-393a-46e9-aee8-e658667261ca
wind_farm_name: Malin
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.crownestatescotland.com/sites/default/files/2025-05/offshore-wind-2025-final.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Crown Estate Scotland offshore wind asset profile
source_of_record_url: https://www.crownestatescotland.com/sites/default/files/2025-05/offshore-wind-2025-final.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No authoritative source found showing FID taken. Status evidence indicates the project is still pre-planning.


wind_farm_id: 6860
canonical_id: 1b8fc897-393a-46e9-aee8-e658667261ca
wind_farm_name: Malin
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.malinseaoffshorewind.com/info
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Malin Sea project information page
source_of_record_url: https://www.malinseaoffshorewind.com/info
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project timeline graphic indicates operation begins in 2031, but this is a forward-looking project schedule rather than a commissioning fact, so full commissioning is kept Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6861
canonical_id: c7bae929-4aab-4fdc-a89a-9e769850e31d
wind_farm_name: Rønland
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Rønland Havvindmøllepark; also referred to as Rønland Offshore Wind Farm / Rønland Vindmøllepark
research_value: Rønland Havvindmøllepark; also referred to as Rønland Offshore Wind Farm / Rønland Vindmøllepark
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency existing offshore wind farms page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Danish Energy Agency (DEA) pages explicitly use Rønland Havvindmøllepark. The project identity is the 2003 Rønland offshore wind farm at Rønland/Nissum Bredning. DEA also distinguishes the original 8-turbine project from the present offshore subset of 4 southern turbines.


wind_farm_id: 6861
canonical_id: c7bae929-4aab-4fdc-a89a-9e769850e31d
wind_farm_name: Rønland
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 42323.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/7495/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Harboøre Tange ApS / Harboøre Møllelaug extension application
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/7495/download
source_of_record_licence: public PDF
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Original developers/applicants: Thyborøn-Harboøre Vindmøllelaug I/S and Vindenergi ApS/Harboøre Møllelaug I/S. Current offshore owners (4 southern turbines): Harboøre Tange ApS 75% and Harboøre Møllelaug I/S 25%. Operator: shared through Driftsselskabet Rønland Havvindmøllepark I/S

resolved_value:
Original developers/applicants: Thyborøn-Harboøre Vindmøllelaug I/S and Vindenergi ApS/Harboøre Møllelaug I/S. Current offshore owners (4 southern turbines): Harboøre Tange ApS 75% and Harboøre Møllelaug I/S 25%. Operator: shared through Driftsselskabet Rønland Havvindmøllepark I/S

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on for current offshore ownership is 12/11/2025 DEA permit extension decision, supported by the owners’ 30/10/2024 application. DEA states the park originally had 8 turbines, with the 4 northern owned by Thyborøn-Harboøre Vindmøllelaug I/S and the 4 southern by Harboøre Tange ApS and Harboøre Møllelaug I/S. The 2024 application gives the current offshore 4-turbine split as 75% / 25% and says operations are run jointly through Driftsselskabet Rønland Havvindmøllepark I/S.


wind_farm_id: 6861
canonical_id: c7bae929-4aab-4fdc-a89a-9e769850e31d
wind_farm_name: Rønland
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/2541/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA establishment permit
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/2541/download
source_of_record_licence: public PDF
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
19/07/2002 permit assumed 4 northern turbines owned by Thyborøn-Harboøre Vindmøllelaug I/S and 4 southern by Vindenergi ApS/Harboøre Møllelaug I/S; by 2024–2025 the offshore 4-turbine section is owned by Harboøre Tange ApS 75% and Harboøre Møllelaug I/S 25%

research_value:
19/07/2002 permit assumed 4 northern turbines owned by Thyborøn-Harboøre Vindmøllelaug I/S and 4 southern by Vindenergi ApS/Harboøre Møllelaug I/S; by 2024–2025 the offshore 4-turbine section is owned by Harboøre Tange ApS 75% and Harboøre Møllelaug I/S 25%

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on is 12/11/2025. The 2002 establishment permit sets the original split across the 8 offshore turbines. Later DEA material and the 2024 owner application show that only the southern 4-turbine offshore section is still treated as offshore and that ownership now sits with Harboøre Tange ApS / Harboøre Møllelaug I/S.


wind_farm_id: 6861
canonical_id: c7bae929-4aab-4fdc-a89a-9e769850e31d
wind_farm_name: Rønland
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 42324.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency existing offshore wind farms page
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/etablerede-havvindmoelleparker
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Closest Boundary Layer status is Operational. DEA’s current offshore-wind page lists Rønland among existing offshore wind farms, but also says only the 4 southern turbines remain offshore; the northern 4 have become land-attached. The offshore 4-turbine section also received a 10-year production-permit extension on 12/11/2025.


wind_farm_id: 6861
canonical_id: c7bae929-4aab-4fdc-a89a-9e769850e31d
wind_farm_name: Rønland
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 17.2 MW
resolved_value: 17.2 MW
research_value: 17.2 MW
resolved_fact_id: 42325.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/6392/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA 2030 scenario note dated 20-12-2024
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/6392/download
source_of_record_licence: public PDF
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
For the exact target identity Rønland, DEA planning material still lists 17.2 MW and 8 turbines for the established park, aligning with the database validation context. However, the current offshore subset retained in DEA’s project page is 4 turbines / 9.2 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6861
canonical_id: c7bae929-4aab-4fdc-a89a-9e769850e31d
wind_farm_name: Rønland
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/2541/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA establishment permit
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/2541/download
source_of_record_licence: public PDF
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No openly accessible source found that explicitly states MEC for the project. Available sources confirm installed capacity and grid connection details, but not a separately stated export-capacity/MEC figure.


wind_farm_id: 6861
canonical_id: c7bae929-4aab-4fdc-a89a-9e769850e31d
wind_farm_name: Rønland
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: SWT-2.3-93
resolved_value: SWT-2.3-93
research_value: SWT-2.3-93
resolved_fact_id: 42326.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific current web sources are mixed because DEA now describes the surviving offshore section as 4 Bonus 2.3 MW turbines, while broader historical summaries describe the original 8-turbine project as mixed Vestas V80-2.0 MW and Bonus/Siemens 2.3-93. For this exact target identity, project-specific web evidence is ambiguous at whole-project level, so the linked EuroWindWakes fallback value was used as required: SWT-2.3-93.


wind_farm_id: 6861
canonical_id: c7bae929-4aab-4fdc-a89a-9e769850e31d
wind_farm_name: Rønland
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens (4), Vestas (4)
resolved_value: Siemens (4), Vestas (4)
research_value: Siemens
resolved_fact_id: 41256.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web evidence is ambiguous at full-project level because sources indicate a mixed historic fleet for the 8-turbine project but a surviving offshore 4-turbine Bonus/Siemens subset. Per the required fallback rule, the linked EuroWindWakes project-turbine metadata was used for the selected value: Siemens.


wind_farm_id: 6861
canonical_id: c7bae929-4aab-4fdc-a89a-9e769850e31d
wind_farm_name: Rønland
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2 (4), 2.3 (4)
resolved_value: 2 (4), 2.3 (4)
research_value: 2.3 MW
resolved_fact_id: 41558.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web evidence is inconclusive for the whole original 8-turbine project because regulator/current-owner pages for the remaining offshore subset say 2.3 MW, while historical summaries show a mixed 2.0 MW / 2.3 MW fleet. Per the required fallback rule, the linked EuroWindWakes value was used: 2.3 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6861
canonical_id: c7bae929-4aab-4fdc-a89a-9e769850e31d
wind_farm_name: Rønland
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 80 (4), 93 (4)
resolved_value: 80 (4), 93 (4)
research_value: 93 m
resolved_fact_id: 41709.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources reviewed did not clearly confirm rotor diameter for the exact target project/phase. Per the required fallback rule, the linked EuroWindWakes value was used: 93 m. The 2024 owner application gives “80 m rotor” for the current 4-turbine offshore subset, creating a project-scope conflict, so the fallback is retained for the exact linked target profile.


wind_farm_id: 6861
canonical_id: c7bae929-4aab-4fdc-a89a-9e769850e31d
wind_farm_name: Rønland
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 80
resolved_value: 80
research_value: 80 m
resolved_fact_id: 41860.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
The 2024 owner application for the current offshore 4 turbines explicitly states 80 m navhøjde. This also matches the linked EuroWindWakes fallback, so the value is confirmed rather than inferred.


wind_farm_id: 6861
canonical_id: c7bae929-4aab-4fdc-a89a-9e769850e31d
wind_farm_name: Rønland
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 8
resolved_value: 8
research_value: 8
resolved_fact_id: 48494.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 8 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: DEA 2030 scenario note dated 20-12-2024
research_source_type: regulator PDF
research_source_url: https://ens.dk/media/6392/download
research_source_licence: public PDF
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
DEA’s broader offshore planning material dated 20/12/2024 still lists Rønland 17.2 MW / 8 turbines, matching the database validation signals and the 2002 establishment permit for 8 offshore turbines. DEA’s newer project page clarifies that only 4 southern turbines are still offshore because the 4 northern turbines have become land-attached. So the web-sourced figure aligns with the validation signals for the original project identity, while present offshore operation is narrower.


wind_farm_id: 6861
canonical_id: c7bae929-4aab-4fdc-a89a-9e769850e31d
wind_farm_name: Rønland
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Piled concrete foundations / point foundations
resolved_value: Piled concrete foundations / point foundations
research_value: Piled concrete foundations / point foundations
resolved_fact_id: 42332.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/7495/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Harboøre Tange ApS / Harboøre Møllelaug extension application
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/7495/download
source_of_record_licence: public PDF
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The 2002 establishment permit states the project consists of 8 turbines on punktfundamenter. The 2024 owner application for the surviving offshore 4-turbine section states the turbines are on fundamenter af beton, som er piloteret. Best-supported concise description is piled concrete / point foundations.


wind_farm_id: 6861
canonical_id: c7bae929-4aab-4fdc-a89a-9e769850e31d
wind_farm_name: Rønland
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 19/07/2002
resolved_value: 19/07/2002
research_value: 19/07/2002
resolved_fact_id: 42333.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/2541/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA establishment permit
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/2541/download
source_of_record_licence: public PDF
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
DEA establishment permit is dated 19. juli 2002 and constitutes the key project consent/establishment approval.


wind_farm_id: 6861
canonical_id: c7bae929-4aab-4fdc-a89a-9e769850e31d
wind_farm_name: Rønland
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/2541/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA establishment permit
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/2541/download
source_of_record_licence: public PDF
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No openly accessible source found stating a specific FID date. Available sources document permitting and operation, but not a clearly labeled FID milestone.


wind_farm_id: 6861
canonical_id: c7bae929-4aab-4fdc-a89a-9e769850e31d
wind_farm_name: Rønland
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/01/2003
resolved_value: 01/01/2003
research_value: 01/01/2003
resolved_fact_id: 42334.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://ens.dk/media/4832/download
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DEA climate assumptions note
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/media/4832/download
source_of_record_licence: public PDF
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Exact first-power date was not found. DEA sources confirm the production licence was issued 02/01/2003 and multiple current DEA summaries list Rønland start/commissioning year as 2003. Following the instructed normalization rule for year-only evidence, the table uses 01/01/2003.


wind_farm_id: 6861
canonical_id: c7bae929-4aab-4fdc-a89a-9e769850e31d
wind_farm_name: Rønland
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2003-01-01
resolved_value: 2003-01-01
research_value: 01/01/2003
resolved_fact_id: 42011.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: DEA climate assumptions note
research_source_type: regulator PDF
research_source_url: https://ens.dk/media/4832/download
research_source_licence: public PDF
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Exact full commissioning date was not found. Multiple sources confirm 2003 as the commissioning/start year; year-only evidence is normalized to 01/01/2003.


wind_farm_id: 6862
canonical_id: d9d7b338-54ab-42ab-afa6-462716cc0bea
wind_farm_name: Nordsøen I A1
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Nordsøen I A1; current official name: Nordsøen I Syd / North Sea I, South
research_value: Nordsøen I A1; current official name: Nordsøen I Syd / North Sea I, South
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/nordsoeen-i-syd-og-midt-havvindmoelleparker
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – Nordsøen I (Syd og Midt)
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/nordsoeen-i-syd-og-midt-havvindmoelleparker
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Exact target identity is the legacy tender/planning name. Current Danish Energy Agency material says the area now tendered as Nordsøen I Syd was previously referred to as A1 (Syd), resolving the name ambiguity and supporting treatment of A1 as the same active parcel under a current name.


wind_farm_id: 6862
canonical_id: d9d7b338-54ab-42ab-afa6-462716cc0bea
wind_farm_name: Nordsøen I A1
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/nordsoeen-i-syd-og-midt-havvindmoelleparker
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – Nordsøen I (Syd og Midt)
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/nordsoeen-i-syd-og-midt-havvindmoelleparker
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
22/04/2024 tender launched for North Sea I, A1; 05/12/2024 no bids received; 19/05/2025 political decision shifted to retendering two parks as Nordsøen I Syd and Nordsøen I Midt

research_value:
22/04/2024 tender launched for North Sea I, A1; 05/12/2024 no bids received; 19/05/2025 political decision shifted to retendering two parks as Nordsøen I Syd and Nordsøen I Midt

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on is 20/11/2025 for the renamed areas and 05/12/2024 for the failed A1 tender. No ownership transfer chain exists because no concessionaire was selected for A1.


wind_farm_id: 6862
canonical_id: d9d7b338-54ab-42ab-afa6-462716cc0bea
wind_farm_name: Nordsøen I A1
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/presse/havvind-energistyrelsen-vedtager-plan-nordsoeen-i
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/presse/havvind-energistyrelsen-vedtager-plan-nordsoeen-i
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Web sources confirm only minimum generation capacity / net connection context, not a project-specific MEC for the exact A1 asset. The wider Nordsøen I plan mentions minimum 3,000 MW net connection across multiple areas, not an A1-specific MEC.


wind_farm_id: 6862
canonical_id: d9d7b338-54ab-42ab-afa6-462716cc0bea
wind_farm_name: Nordsøen I A1
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://eu.eu-supply.com/ctm/Supplier/PublicPurchase/399413/1/0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EU Supply – North Sea I, A1, Offshore Wind Farm - Denmark
source_of_record_url: https://eu.eu-supply.com/ctm/Supplier/PublicPurchase/399413/1/0
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No winning bidder and no project-specific turbine selection confirmed for A1 / renamed South at this stage. No linked EuroWindWakes turbine row was provided, so no turbine fallback applies.


wind_farm_id: 6862
canonical_id: d9d7b338-54ab-42ab-afa6-462716cc0bea
wind_farm_name: Nordsøen I A1
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 9005.0
resolved_source_type: emodnet
resolved_source_name: EMODnet Human Activities
resolved_source_detail: EMODnet Jan 2026
citation_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMODnet Human Activities
source_of_record_type: public data portal
source_of_record_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
source_of_record_licence: Free and open public portal
research_source_name: Styrelsen for Grøn Arealomlægning og Vandmiljø – Landanlæg til Nordsøen I - A1
research_source_type: government
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific turbine layout is confirmed. This does not align with the database validation signal of 0 as a physical turbine count; web sources indicate a planned 1 GW-class project/lease area, so the database 0 is most likely a placeholder for an unbuilt concept rather than evidence of a final turbine count.

research_source_url:
https://sgavmst.dk/natur-og-jagt/miljoevurdering/igangvaerende-miljoevurderinger/landanlaeg-til-nordsoeen-i-a1-nymindegab-til-endrup


wind_farm_id: 6862
canonical_id: d9d7b338-54ab-42ab-afa6-462716cc0bea
wind_farm_name: Nordsøen I A1
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://eu.eu-supply.com/ctm/Supplier/PublicPurchase/399413/1/0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EU Supply – North Sea I, A1, Offshore Wind Farm - Denmark
source_of_record_url: https://eu.eu-supply.com/ctm/Supplier/PublicPurchase/399413/1/0
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific foundation concept confirmed for the exact A1 / South area in accessible sources reviewed.


wind_farm_id: 6862
canonical_id: d9d7b338-54ab-42ab-afa6-462716cc0bea
wind_farm_name: Nordsøen I A1
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/presse/havvind-energistyrelsen-vedtager-plan-nordsoeen-i
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency press release
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/presse/havvind-energistyrelsen-vedtager-plan-nordsoeen-i
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The plan for Nordsøen I was adopted on 01/10/2024, but official sources also state the plan alone does not permit construction; no project-specific consent for A1 is confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6862
canonical_id: d9d7b338-54ab-42ab-afa6-462716cc0bea
wind_farm_name: Nordsøen I A1
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
research_summary: No bidder/owner selected for A1, so no FID is confirmed.
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://ens.dk/en/press/north-sea-offshore-wind-tendering-procedure-danish-energy-agency-has-not-received-any-bids

source_of_record_url:
https://ens.dk/en/press/north-sea-offshore-wind-tendering-procedure-danish-energy-agency-has-not-received-any-bids


wind_farm_id: 6862
canonical_id: d9d7b338-54ab-42ab-afa6-462716cc0bea
wind_farm_name: Nordsøen I A1
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/nordsoeen-i-syd-og-midt-havvindmoelleparker
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Danish Energy Agency – Nordsøen I (Syd og Midt)
source_of_record_url: https://ens.dk/energikilder/nordsoeen-i-syd-og-midt-havvindmoelleparker
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project has been awarded or built. Current official page gives only an expected commissioning window for renamed Nordsøen I Syd by end-2034, not first power for exact legacy A1.


wind_farm_id: 16027
canonical_id: f139f444-9bbc-4cc7-b226-d2c6ccb9b7e3
wind_farm_name: White Cross
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://whitecrossoffshorewind.com/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: White Cross project website
source_of_record_url: https://whitecrossoffshorewind.com/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
White Cross Offshore Windfarm; also referred to as White Cross Offshore Wind Farm / White Cross floating offshore wind project

research_value:
White Cross Offshore Windfarm; also referred to as White Cross Offshore Wind Farm / White Cross floating offshore wind project

research_summary:
The official project website uses White Cross offshore windfarm. The project is described as a UK test and demonstration project and a floating offshore wind project in developer materials and partner updates.


wind_farm_id: 16027
canonical_id: f139f444-9bbc-4cc7-b226-d2c6ccb9b7e3
wind_farm_name: White Cross
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35814.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://flotationenergy.com/projects/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Flotation Energy projects
source_of_record_url: https://flotationenergy.com/projects/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: White Cross Offshore Windfarm Ltd / Offshore Wind Limited JV between Flotation Energy and Cobra; Current owners: Flotation Energy and Cobra; ownership percentages: Not confirmed; Operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: White Cross Offshore Windfarm Ltd / Offshore Wind Limited JV between Flotation Energy and Cobra; Current owners: Flotation Energy and Cobra; ownership percentages: Not confirmed; Operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
The freshest ownership confirmation found is Flotation Energy’s project portfolio page crawled in 2026, which says White Cross is being developed through its partnership with Cobra. The White Cross “Who we are” page also states Cobra and Flotation Energy are joint venture project partners. No accessible current source found that reconciles percentage shares, so ownership split is Not confirmed rather than inferred.


wind_farm_id: 16027
canonical_id: f139f444-9bbc-4cc7-b226-d2c6ccb9b7e3
wind_farm_name: White Cross
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://whitecrossoffshorewind.com/faqs/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: White Cross FAQs
source_of_record_url: https://whitecrossoffshorewind.com/faqs/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
2021 seabed rights secured under The Crown Estate Test & Demonstration opportunity; project company remains a Cobra + Flotation Energy JV; no confirmed later equity transfer found

research_value:
2021 seabed rights secured under The Crown Estate Test & Demonstration opportunity; project company remains a Cobra + Flotation Energy JV; no confirmed later equity transfer found

research_summary:
Freshest dated source used is Flotation Energy’s 07/08/2025 consent announcement, which still describes White Cross as a project of Flotation Energy and Cobra. White Cross FAQs say development rights were secured from The Crown Estate in 07/2021 as a test-and-demonstration site. No later ownership sale or new equity partner was confirmed from accessible sources.


wind_farm_id: 16027
canonical_id: f139f444-9bbc-4cc7-b226-d2c6ccb9b7e3
wind_farm_name: White Cross
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Consented
resolved_value: Consented
research_value: Consented
resolved_fact_id: 35815.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://flotationenergy.com/white-cross-offshore-windfarm-receives-full-planning-consent/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Flotation Energy consent announcement
source_of_record_url: https://flotationenergy.com/white-cross-offshore-windfarm-receives-full-planning-consent/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
White Cross now has both onshore and offshore approvals. White Cross’ planning page says the marine licence for offshore elements has been granted and onshore consent has been granted by North Devon Council; Flotation Energy’s 07/08/2025 release says the project has received full onshore and offshore planning approval. This fits the exact Boundary Layer label Consented.


wind_farm_id: 16027
canonical_id: f139f444-9bbc-4cc7-b226-d2c6ccb9b7e3
wind_farm_name: White Cross
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 100 MW
resolved_value: Up to 100 MW
research_value: Up to 100 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35816.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://whitecrossoffshorewind.com/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: White Cross project website
source_of_record_url: https://whitecrossoffshorewind.com/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Multiple project-specific sources describe White Cross as a 100 MW floating offshore windfarm / up to 100 MW project.


wind_farm_id: 16027
canonical_id: f139f444-9bbc-4cc7-b226-d2c6ccb9b7e3
wind_farm_name: White Cross
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://whitecrossoffshorewind.com/planning-consent-offshore-onshore/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: White Cross planning and consent
source_of_record_url: https://whitecrossoffshorewind.com/planning-consent-offshore-onshore/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Accessible sources consistently confirm planned installed capacity up to 100 MW, but no openly accessible source reviewed clearly labels a separate Maximum Export Capacity / MEC figure. Because gross capacity and MEC may differ, this is left Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 16027
canonical_id: f139f444-9bbc-4cc7-b226-d2c6ccb9b7e3
wind_farm_name: White Cross
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://whitecrossoffshorewind.com/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: White Cross project website
source_of_record_url: https://whitecrossoffshorewind.com/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources reviewed describe only floating wind turbines / state-of-the-art floating offshore wind turbines and do not identify a model. No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided in context, so the correct output is Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 16027
canonical_id: f139f444-9bbc-4cc7-b226-d2c6ccb9b7e3
wind_farm_name: White Cross
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://whitecrossoffshorewind.com/project-progress/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: White Cross project progress
source_of_record_url: https://whitecrossoffshorewind.com/project-progress/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific accessible source found that names the OEM for White Cross. Per instruction, this is not inferred from generic turbine platforms.


wind_farm_id: 16027
canonical_id: f139f444-9bbc-4cc7-b226-d2c6ccb9b7e3
wind_farm_name: White Cross
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: White Cross offshore consent submission news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://whitecrossoffshorewind.com/powering-forward-white-cross-section-36-and-marine-licence-application-submitted-for-offshore-consent/

research_summary:
Public project sources confirm only overall project capacity and a range of 6 to 8 turbines. Because turbine count remains flexible, project-specific individual turbine rating is not yet confirmed and is not inferred.

source_of_record_url:
https://whitecrossoffshorewind.com/powering-forward-white-cross-section-36-and-marine-licence-application-submitted-for-offshore-consent/


wind_farm_id: 16027
canonical_id: f139f444-9bbc-4cc7-b226-d2c6ccb9b7e3
wind_farm_name: White Cross
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://whitecrossoffshorewind.com/documents/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: White Cross documents page
source_of_record_url: https://whitecrossoffshorewind.com/documents/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific accessible source found that explicitly ties a hub height to White Cross. Per instruction, hub height is not inferred from any generic turbine platform.


wind_farm_id: 16027
canonical_id: f139f444-9bbc-4cc7-b226-d2c6ccb9b7e3
wind_farm_name: White Cross
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 6 to 8 turbines
resolved_value: 6 to 8 turbines
research_value: 6 to 8 turbines
resolved_fact_id: 35817.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: White Cross offshore consent submission news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://whitecrossoffshorewind.com/powering-forward-white-cross-section-36-and-marine-licence-application-submitted-for-offshore-consent/

research_summary:
The official project website says up to eight turbines; the 2023 offshore consent-submission release says between six to eight turbines; the 2024/2025 decommissioning material also states a minimum of 6 and maximum of 8 WTGs depending on size and capacity. This aligns with the non-web validation context having no fixed turbine-count override and indicates the final as-built count is still flexible at consent stage.


wind_farm_id: 16027
canonical_id: f139f444-9bbc-4cc7-b226-d2c6ccb9b7e3
wind_farm_name: White Cross
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Floating semi-submersible platforms, moored with seabed anchors
resolved_value: Floating semi-submersible platforms, moored with seabed anchors
research_value: Floating semi-submersible platforms, moored with seabed anchors
resolved_fact_id: 35818.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: White Cross outline decommissioning programme
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://whitecrossoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/WHX001-FLO-CON-ENV-PLN-0011-Outline-Decommissioning-Programme.pdf

research_summary:
Project-specific decommissioning documentation explicitly identifies semi-submersible floating platforms with subsea mooring lines and anchoring solutions. This is the clearest project-tied foundation evidence located.

source_of_record_url:
https://whitecrossoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/WHX001-FLO-CON-ENV-PLN-0011-Outline-Decommissioning-Programme.pdf


wind_farm_id: 16027
canonical_id: f139f444-9bbc-4cc7-b226-d2c6ccb9b7e3
wind_farm_name: White Cross
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 07/08/2025
resolved_value: 07/08/2025
research_value: 07/08/2025
resolved_fact_id: 35819.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://flotationenergy.com/white-cross-offshore-windfarm-receives-full-planning-consent/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Flotation Energy consent announcement
source_of_record_url: https://flotationenergy.com/white-cross-offshore-windfarm-receives-full-planning-consent/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Flotation Energy’s dated release on 07/08/2025 says White Cross has been granted full onshore and offshore planning approval. White Cross’ planning page also states both onshore and offshore consents have been granted, but without a precise single consent date on-page; the dated partner release is therefore used for the normalized row.


wind_farm_id: 16027
canonical_id: f139f444-9bbc-4cc7-b226-d2c6ccb9b7e3
wind_farm_name: White Cross
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://whitecrossoffshorewind.com/project-progress/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: White Cross project progress
source_of_record_url: https://whitecrossoffshorewind.com/project-progress/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project progress page shows post-consent engineering and site investigation steps, but no accessible official source reviewed states that FID has been taken.


wind_farm_id: 16027
canonical_id: f139f444-9bbc-4cc7-b226-d2c6ccb9b7e3
wind_farm_name: White Cross
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/01/2029
resolved_value: 01/01/2029
research_value: 01/01/2029
resolved_fact_id: 35820.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://whitecrossoffshorewind.com/project-progress/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: White Cross project progress
source_of_record_url: https://whitecrossoffshorewind.com/project-progress/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The official project progress page says 2029 – Deliver first power to National Grid. Only the year is shown, so this is normalized to 01/01/2029 per instruction. This is a projected milestone, not achieved first power.


wind_farm_id: 16027
canonical_id: f139f444-9bbc-4cc7-b226-d2c6ccb9b7e3
wind_farm_name: White Cross
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://whitecrossoffshorewind.com/project-progress/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: White Cross project progress
source_of_record_url: https://whitecrossoffshorewind.com/project-progress/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible project-specific source reviewed gives a full commissioning / full operations date. The available timeline confirms projected first power in 2029 but not full commissioning.


wind_farm_id: 21317
canonical_id: f9c09233-832d-48d8-891c-a4df9b0bd58f
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Grand Large
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Bretagne Grand Large (BGL)
research_value: Bretagne Grand Large (BGL)
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-namo
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer – concertation continue NAMO
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-namo
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Assessed project is the exact target identity Bretagne Grand Large, which current official French sources describe as a 2050 planning zone / zone prioritaire for future offshore wind development, not the earlier tender vehicle Éoliennes Flottantes Bretagne Grand Large for the south Brittany commercial floating project. This is therefore an identity mismatch with similarly named AO5 tender material, which was not merged into this profile.


wind_farm_id: 21317
canonical_id: f9c09233-832d-48d8-891c-a4df9b0bd58f
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Grand Large
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-namo
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer – concertation continue NAMO
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-namo
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current official sources describe Bretagne Grand Large as a state-identified priority zone for possible development by 2050, not a project with a confirmed developer, owner, operator, or equity structure. Freshest source used for this conclusion: Eoliennes en mer page dated 20/03/2025; DREAL Bretagne page published in 2026 also presents it as a zone rather than a consented project.


wind_farm_id: 21317
canonical_id: f9c09233-832d-48d8-891c-a4df9b0bd58f
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Grand Large
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.bretagne.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/cartographie-de-l-eolien-en-mer-a5901.html
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DREAL Bretagne – Cartographie de l’éolien en mer
source_of_record_url: https://www.bretagne.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/cartographie-de-l-eolien-en-mer-a5901.html
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project company, ownership split, or operator history could be confirmed for the exact target identity. The similarly named company Éoliennes Flottantes Bretagne Grand Large belongs to a different south Brittany tender context and was excluded to avoid silent substitution. Freshest source date relied on for the exact target identity is 20/03/2025 from the state project portal.


wind_farm_id: 21317
canonical_id: f9c09233-832d-48d8-891c-a4df9b0bd58f
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Grand Large
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Development Zone / lease area
resolved_value: Development Zone / lease area
research_value: Development Zone / lease area
resolved_fact_id: 48605.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-namo
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Eoliennes en mer – concertation continue NAMO
source_of_record_url: https://www.eoliennesenmer.fr/concertation-continue/concertation-continue-namo
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official sources consistently present Bretagne Grand Large as a zone prioritaire pour le développement de l’éolien en mer à l’horizon 2050, with further studies and consultation still required. I rejected Concept because the evidence better fits a large state planning area rather than a defined project; I rejected Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning because no awarded lease or developer is confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 21317
canonical_id: f9c09233-832d-48d8-891c-a4df9b0bd58f
wind_farm_name: Bretagne Grand Large
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Observatoire de l’environnement en Bretagne article
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://bretagne-environnement.fr/thematique/energie/article/energie-renouvelable-eolien-terrestre-mer-bretagne

research_summary:
No installed or planned project capacity is confirmed for the exact Bretagne Grand Large zone. Regional OEB material labels technology and capacity as unknown for BGL, and OEB’s 2024 article says power estimates are not yet available.


