# wind_farm_dossier_fields

wind_farm_id: 6655
canonical_id: 7be3bc36-7e47-489a-ab4d-15376b695922
wind_farm_name: Cedar
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://ceruleanwinds.com/north-sea-renewables-grid-nsrg/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cerulean Winds NSRG page
source_of_record_url: https://ceruleanwinds.com/north-sea-renewables-grid-nsrg/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine row was available, and no project-specific source found a Cedar hub height. I therefore leave this as Not confirmed and do not infer from turbine model.


wind_farm_id: 6655
canonical_id: 7be3bc36-7e47-489a-ab4d-15376b695922
wind_farm_name: Cedar
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 8805.0
resolved_source_type: emodnet
resolved_source_name: EMODnet Human Activities
resolved_source_detail: EMODnet Jan 2026
citation_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMODnet Human Activities
source_of_record_type: public data portal
source_of_record_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
source_of_record_licence: Free and open public portal
research_source_name: Marine gov.scot cumulative effects assessment excerpt
research_source_type: regulator/planning document
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Cerulean’s NSRG-wide pages say over 300 turbines / up to 300 turbines across Aspen, Beech and Cedar combined, but do not give a Cedar-only count. A Marine Directorate EIA context table mentions Cedar … consisting of 30 turbines, which conflicts with the rough arithmetic implied by 1008 MW at current large floating turbine sizes and may reflect an indicative scenario in another project’s cumulative assessment. Given that conflict, Cedar-specific turbine count remains Not confirmed. This differs from the non-web validation signal of 0, likely because the dataset reflects a pre-build/pre-spec stage rather than a project design freeze.

research_source_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/cenos_eia_vol.4_-_a31_-_cumulative_effects_assessment.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6655
canonical_id: 7be3bc36-7e47-489a-ab4d-15376b695922
wind_farm_name: Cedar
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Floating foundations
resolved_value: Floating foundations
research_value: Floating foundations
resolved_fact_id: 34194.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine gov.scot EIA context citing Cedar as floating OWF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/cenos_eia_vol.3_-_chapter_17_-_marine_infrastructure_and_other_sea_users_redacted.pdf

research_summary:
Cedar is repeatedly described as a floating offshore wind project / floating OWF. However, no project-specific accessible source found a narrower confirmed sub-type such as semi-submersible, spar, or TLP, so the confirmed answer is only floating foundations.

source_of_record_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/cenos_eia_vol.3_-_chapter_17_-_marine_infrastructure_and_other_sea_users_redacted.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6655
canonical_id: 7be3bc36-7e47-489a-ab4d-15376b695922
wind_farm_name: Cedar
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=node%2F26047
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine gov.scot Aspen scoping page
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/?q=node%2F26047
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No Cedar-specific consent application/decision date found. Accessible formal scoping/application evidence located was for Aspen rather than Cedar.


wind_farm_id: 6655
canonical_id: 7be3bc36-7e47-489a-ab4d-15376b695922
wind_farm_name: Cedar
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cerulean exclusivity agreements news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://ceruleanwinds.com/cerulean-winds-signs-exclusivity-agreements-for-trio-of-uk-floating-wind-sites/

research_summary:
No project-specific Cedar FID source found. Cerulean’s public materials discuss development and targeted milestones, not a taken FID for Cedar.


wind_farm_id: 6655
canonical_id: 7be3bc36-7e47-489a-ab4d-15376b695922
wind_farm_name: Cedar
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cerulean exclusivity agreements news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Cerulean’s 28/11/2023 portfolio update targets first power in 2028 for the overall NSRG/Aspen-Beech-Cedar development, but no Cedar-specific first-power date is confirmed; therefore left as Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6656
canonical_id: b3ff73d5-038a-485d-8172-720ac018b45f
wind_farm_name: Cenos
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Cenos Offshore Windfarm; alternative / historic names: Not confirmed
research_value: Cenos Offshore Windfarm; alternative / historic names: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate section 36 consent application cover letter
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/cenos_eia-_section_36_consent_application_covering_letter_-_29_jan_2025_redacted.pdf

research_summary:
The project website and Marine Directorate application materials consistently use Cenos Offshore Windfarm / Cenos Offshore Windfarm Ltd. I did not find a clearly evidenced former project name, so historic naming is left Not confirmed rather than inferred.

source_of_record_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/cenos_eia-_section_36_consent_application_covering_letter_-_29_jan_2025_redacted.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6656
canonical_id: b3ff73d5-038a-485d-8172-720ac018b45f
wind_farm_name: Cenos
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34195.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cenos Report to Inform Appropriate Assessment
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Cenos Offshore Windfarm Ltd; current owners: Flotation Energy 50%, Vårgrønn 50%; operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: Cenos Offshore Windfarm Ltd; current owners: Flotation Energy 50%, Vårgrønn 50%; operator: Not confirmed

citation_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/cenos_eia_-_report_to_inform_apprpriate_assessment_0.pdf

research_summary:
The clearest project-specific ownership wording is in the application material stating the applicant has been created as a 50/50 joint venture between Flotation Energy and Vårgrønn. Freshest source relied on for current ownership is the 26/02/2025 project press release confirming the JV partners; the application RIAA also states 50/50. No separate operating entity was clearly confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/cenos_eia_-_report_to_inform_apprpriate_assessment_0.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6656
canonical_id: b3ff73d5-038a-485d-8172-720ac018b45f
wind_farm_name: Cenos
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://cenosoffshorewind.com/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cenos project website
source_of_record_url: https://cenosoffshorewind.com/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Flotation Energy pursued Cenos from 2020 and Vårgrønn joined as partner in 2022; current evidenced split remains 50% / 50%

research_value:
Flotation Energy pursued Cenos from 2020 and Vårgrønn joined as partner in 2022; current evidenced split remains 50% / 50%

research_summary:
The blocked source was replaced with the current project website timeline plus 2025 application materials. The website says Flotation Energy started conceptualising the Cenos project in 2020 and Vårgrønn joined as a partner for the project in 2022; the 2025 application materials still describe Cenos Offshore Windfarm Ltd as a 50/50 JV. No later transfer of equity in the wind farm itself was found.


wind_farm_id: 6656
canonical_id: b3ff73d5-038a-485d-8172-720ac018b45f
wind_farm_name: Cenos
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
research_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_fact_id: 34196.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://cenosoffshorewind.com/offshore-consent-application-submitted-for-cenos-offshore-windfarm/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cenos consent application press release
source_of_record_url: https://cenosoffshorewind.com/offshore-consent-application-submitted-for-cenos-offshore-windfarm/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
This exact Boundary Layer label matches the latest evidence: the project submitted its offshore consent application to MD-LOT on 26/02/2025, so it is beyond lease award / scoping but not yet consented.


wind_farm_id: 6656
canonical_id: b3ff73d5-038a-485d-8172-720ac018b45f
wind_farm_name: Cenos
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1,350 MW planned
resolved_value: 1,350 MW planned
research_value: 1,350 MW planned
resolved_fact_id: 34197.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://cenosoffshorewind.com/offshore-consent-application-submitted-for-cenos-offshore-windfarm/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cenos consent application press release
source_of_record_url: https://cenosoffshorewind.com/offshore-consent-application-submitted-for-cenos-offshore-windfarm/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific sources consistently describe Cenos as having a nominal / generating capacity of up to 1,350 MW. This aligns with the validation context.


wind_farm_id: 6656
canonical_id: b3ff73d5-038a-485d-8172-720ac018b45f
wind_farm_name: Cenos
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cenos EIA Chapter 5
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://cenosoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/CEN001-FLO-CON-ENV-RPT-0008-Cenos-EIA-Vol.2-Chapter-5-Project-Description.pdf

research_summary:
I found clear evidence for gross planned capacity, but not a clearly labelled project MEC / export capacity figure on an accessible authoritative source. Because Cenos is designed both to supply offshore oil and gas assets and connect to the UK grid, gross capacity should not be assumed equal to MEC.

source_of_record_url:
https://cenosoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/CEN001-FLO-CON-ENV-RPT-0008-Cenos-EIA-Vol.2-Chapter-5-Project-Description.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6656
canonical_id: b3ff73d5-038a-485d-8172-720ac018b45f
wind_farm_name: Cenos
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cenos EIA Chapter 5
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://cenosoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/CEN001-FLO-CON-ENV-RPT-0008-Cenos-EIA-Vol.2-Chapter-5-Project-Description.pdf

research_summary:
The consent application uses a project design envelope only; it does not confirm a selected turbine model. No linked EuroWindWakes turbine row was provided in context, so model remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6656
canonical_id: b3ff73d5-038a-485d-8172-720ac018b45f
wind_farm_name: Cenos
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cenos EIA Chapter 5
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific source reviewed names a selected OEM. The application still reflects an unfinalised design envelope rather than an awarded turbine package.


wind_farm_id: 6656
canonical_id: b3ff73d5-038a-485d-8172-720ac018b45f
wind_farm_name: Cenos
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 15–21 MW (design envelope)
resolved_value: 15–21 MW (design envelope)
research_value: 15–21 MW (design envelope)
resolved_fact_id: 34198.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cenos EIA Chapter 5
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No chosen turbine has been confirmed, but the project-specific EIA explicitly references a 15 MW to 21 MW WTG envelope; this is stronger than leaving the field blank because it is explicitly tied to Cenos.


wind_farm_id: 6656
canonical_id: b3ff73d5-038a-485d-8172-720ac018b45f
wind_farm_name: Cenos
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 232–280 m (design envelope)
resolved_value: 232–280 m (design envelope)
research_value: 232–280 m (design envelope)
resolved_fact_id: 34199.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cenos EIA Chapter 5
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The EIA’s WTG design envelope table gives a minimum to maximum rotor diameter of 232 to 280 m. This is project-specific, but still envelope-based rather than as-selected equipment.


wind_farm_id: 6656
canonical_id: b3ff73d5-038a-485d-8172-720ac018b45f
wind_farm_name: Cenos
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 180 m maximum above LAT (design envelope)
resolved_value: 180 m maximum above LAT (design envelope)
research_value: 180 m maximum above LAT (design envelope)
resolved_fact_id: 34200.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cenos EIA Chapter 5
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No selected turbine hub height was confirmed. The project-specific EIA gives maximum WTG hub height above LAT: 180 m; this is the best project-tied value available and should be read as an application envelope maximum, not an as-built hub height.


wind_farm_id: 6656
canonical_id: b3ff73d5-038a-485d-8172-720ac018b45f
wind_farm_name: Cenos
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 95
resolved_value: Up to 95
research_value: Up to 95
resolved_fact_id: 34201.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://cenosoffshorewind.com/offshore-consent-application-submitted-for-cenos-offshore-windfarm/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cenos consent application press release
source_of_record_url: https://cenosoffshorewind.com/offshore-consent-application-submitted-for-cenos-offshore-windfarm/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The clearest project-specific figure is up to 95 floating turbine units / maximum number of WTGs 95 in the 2025 application material. This differs from the non-web validation signal of 0, which is likely because that dataset row reflects a pre-build planning-stage placeholder rather than the submitted application design envelope.


wind_farm_id: 6656
canonical_id: b3ff73d5-038a-485d-8172-720ac018b45f
wind_farm_name: Cenos
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34202.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cenos EIA Chapter 5
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Floating substructure options under assessment: semi-submersible or Tension Leg Platform (TLP), with moored anchors

resolved_value:
Floating substructure options under assessment: semi-submersible or Tension Leg Platform (TLP), with moored anchors

research_summary:
The project is a floating windfarm and the application has not yet fixed one substructure type. Chapter 5 explicitly says the floating substructures currently being considered are semi-submersible and TLP.


wind_farm_id: 6656
canonical_id: b3ff73d5-038a-485d-8172-720ac018b45f
wind_farm_name: Cenos
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://cenosoffshorewind.com/offshore-consent-application-submitted-for-cenos-offshore-windfarm/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cenos consent application press release
source_of_record_url: https://cenosoffshorewind.com/offshore-consent-application-submitted-for-cenos-offshore-windfarm/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
An offshore consent application was submitted in early 2025, but no consent award date was found because the project is still at application stage.


wind_farm_id: 6656
canonical_id: b3ff73d5-038a-485d-8172-720ac018b45f
wind_farm_name: Cenos
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://cenosoffshorewind.com/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cenos project website
source_of_record_url: https://cenosoffshorewind.com/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No authoritative source reviewed indicates FID has been taken; this is consistent with the project still awaiting consent.


wind_farm_id: 6656
canonical_id: b3ff73d5-038a-485d-8172-720ac018b45f
wind_farm_name: Cenos
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://cenosoffshorewind.com/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cenos project website
source_of_record_url: https://cenosoffshorewind.com/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The website says the project is delivering renewable energy from 2031, but I did not find a clearly labelled first-power milestone date. To avoid overstating a marketing timeline as a formal milestone, first power remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6656
canonical_id: b3ff73d5-038a-485d-8172-720ac018b45f
wind_farm_name: Cenos
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://cenosoffshorewind.com/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cenos project website
source_of_record_url: https://cenosoffshorewind.com/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I did not find an authoritative project source stating a formal commissioning date. The site branding suggests operation from 2031, but not a confirmed full commissioning milestone.


wind_farm_id: 6657
canonical_id: 7232640e-430f-403a-8975-a80b5a64d179
wind_farm_name: MarramWind
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: MarramWind Offshore Wind Farm
research_value: MarramWind Offshore Wind Farm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: MarramWind application cover letter
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.marramwind.co.uk/userfiles/file/MarramWind_Section_36_and_Marine_Licence_Application_Cover_Letter.pdf

research_summary:
Official project materials use MarramWind Offshore Wind Farm. Historic ownership context matters: MarramWind and CampionWind were originally developed together by ScottishPower Renewables and Shell, then separated in November 2025, with SPR retaining MarramWind.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.marramwind.co.uk/userfiles/file/MarramWind_Section_36_and_Marine_Licence_Application_Cover_Letter.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6657
canonical_id: 7232640e-430f-403a-8975-a80b5a64d179
wind_farm_name: MarramWind
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34203.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.scottishpower.com/documents/d/guest/SPUK_2025_Annual_Accounts
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower annual accounts 2025
source_of_record_url: https://www.scottishpower.com/documents/d/guest/SPUK_2025_Annual_Accounts
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: ScottishPower Renewables (via MarramWind Limited). Current owner: ScottishPower Renewables (UK) Limited / MarramWind Limited. Operator: Not confirmed separately from developer.

resolved_value:
Developer: ScottishPower Renewables (via MarramWind Limited). Current owner: ScottishPower Renewables (UK) Limited / MarramWind Limited. Operator: Not confirmed separately from developer.

research_summary:
The freshest ownership evidence is ScottishPower annual accounts published April 2026, stating SPRUKL took 100% ownership of MarramWind Limited in November 2025. The January 2026 application cover letter says MarramWind Limited is wholly owned by ScottishPower Renewables (UK) Limited. No separate operator was clearly identified in accessible sources.


wind_farm_id: 6657
canonical_id: 7232640e-430f-403a-8975-a80b5a64d179
wind_farm_name: MarramWind
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.scottishpower.com/documents/d/guest/SPUK_2025_Annual_Accounts
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower annual accounts 2025
source_of_record_url: https://www.scottishpower.com/documents/d/guest/SPUK_2025_Annual_Accounts
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
50% ScottishPower Renewables / 50% Shell initially; since 01/11/2025 ScottishPower Renewables holds 100% of MarramWind

research_value:
50% ScottishPower Renewables / 50% Shell initially; since 01/11/2025 ScottishPower Renewables holds 100% of MarramWind

research_summary:
The freshest source date relied on is April 2026 (ScottishPower annual accounts), which confirms the November 2025 restructuring. Earlier project/regulator material still described MarramWind as a 50/50 joint venture during pre-application work, so the ownership changed after much of the earlier EIA/scoping record was prepared.


wind_farm_id: 6657
canonical_id: 7232640e-430f-403a-8975-a80b5a64d179
wind_farm_name: MarramWind
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
research_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_fact_id: 34204.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.marramwind.co.uk/faqs
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: MarramWind FAQs
source_of_record_url: https://www.marramwind.co.uk/faqs
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current project FAQ states that consent applications were submitted in January 2026 to the Marine Directorate and Aberdeenshire Council. Offshore Wind Scotland also reported the Section 36 planning application was submitted on 23/01/2026. This fits the Boundary Layer status In Planning / Consent Application Submitted.


wind_farm_id: 6657
canonical_id: 7232640e-430f-403a-8975-a80b5a64d179
wind_farm_name: MarramWind
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 3000 MW
resolved_value: 3000 MW
research_value: 3000 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34205.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.marramwind.co.uk/faqs
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: MarramWind FAQs
source_of_record_url: https://www.marramwind.co.uk/faqs
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Multiple current project sources describe MarramWind as up to 3GW. This aligns with the database validation context.


wind_farm_id: 6657
canonical_id: 7232640e-430f-403a-8975-a80b5a64d179
wind_farm_name: MarramWind
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 3000 MW
resolved_value: 3000 MW
research_value: 3000 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34206.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: MarramWind application cover letter
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.marramwind.co.uk/userfiles/file/MarramWind_Section_36_and_Marine_Licence_Application_Cover_Letter.pdf

research_summary:
A separate MEC label was not explicitly used, but the project’s application and scoping documents repeatedly state a total grid connection capacity of up to 3GW and a full 3GW connection. For this planned project, the best-supported MEC-equivalent value is therefore 3000 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6657
canonical_id: 7232640e-430f-403a-8975-a80b5a64d179
wind_farm_name: MarramWind
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.marramwind.co.uk/faqs
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: MarramWind FAQs
source_of_record_url: https://www.marramwind.co.uk/faqs
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources reviewed do not confirm a selected turbine model. The application/scoping material only gives a design envelope, and no linked EuroWindWakes turbine row was available in the task context, so per instruction this remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6657
canonical_id: 7232640e-430f-403a-8975-a80b5a64d179
wind_farm_name: MarramWind
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.marramwind.co.uk/faqs
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: MarramWind FAQs
source_of_record_url: https://www.marramwind.co.uk/faqs
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible project-specific source identified a chosen OEM. Earlier and current application materials describe an early-stage technology envelope only.


wind_farm_id: 6657
canonical_id: 7232640e-430f-403a-8975-a80b5a64d179
wind_farm_name: MarramWind
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 25 MW
resolved_value: Up to 25 MW
research_value: Up to 25 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34207.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.marramwind.co.uk/userfiles/file/MarramWind_Scoping_Report.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: MarramWind scoping report
source_of_record_url: https://www.marramwind.co.uk/userfiles/file/MarramWind_Scoping_Report.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The January 2023 scoping report states each WTG will have an individual generation capacity of up to 25 MW. Later FAQ wording still says turbine design remains at an early engineering phase, so this should be read as a planning envelope, not a final selected turbine rating.


wind_farm_id: 6657
canonical_id: 7232640e-430f-403a-8975-a80b5a64d179
wind_farm_name: MarramWind
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.marramwind.co.uk/faqs
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: MarramWind FAQs
source_of_record_url: https://www.marramwind.co.uk/faqs
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific accessible source found a confirmed rotor diameter for MarramWind. The project remains in planning and turbine selection is not finalised.


wind_farm_id: 6657
canonical_id: 7232640e-430f-403a-8975-a80b5a64d179
wind_farm_name: MarramWind
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.marramwind.co.uk/faqs
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: MarramWind FAQs
source_of_record_url: https://www.marramwind.co.uk/faqs
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific accessible source found a confirmed hub height for MarramWind, and the task instructions prohibit inferring hub height from a generic turbine platform. No linked EuroWindWakes fallback value was provided.


wind_farm_id: 6657
canonical_id: 7232640e-430f-403a-8975-a80b5a64d179
wind_farm_name: MarramWind
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Up to 225
resolved_value: Up to 225
research_value: Up to 225
resolved_fact_id: 34208.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Licence Application 1
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.marramwind.co.uk/userfiles/file/2025_12_17_-_MarramWind_-_Marine_Licence_Application_1_-_Generating_Station_Phases_1-3.pdf

research_summary:
Current project FAQ gives an expected range of 126 to 225 turbines; the January 2026 marine licence application states the generating station comprises up to 225 WTGs. This differs from the non-web validation signal of 0, which is best interpreted as a dataset placeholder for an unbuilt project rather than a project-design count.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.marramwind.co.uk/userfiles/file/2025_12_17_-_MarramWind_-_Marine_Licence_Application_1_-_Generating_Station_Phases_1-3.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6657
canonical_id: 7232640e-430f-403a-8975-a80b5a64d179
wind_farm_name: MarramWind
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Floating foundations; specific floater concept not confirmed
resolved_value: Floating foundations; specific floater concept not confirmed
research_value: Floating foundations; specific floater concept not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 34209.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.marramwind.co.uk/userfiles/file/MarramWind_Scoping_Report.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: MarramWind scoping report
source_of_record_url: https://www.marramwind.co.uk/userfiles/file/MarramWind_Scoping_Report.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The scoping report explicitly states Foundation type: Floating (concept to be confirmed), and the FAQ explains turbines will sit on floating platforms anchored by moorings and anchors. No final floater subtype has been selected.


wind_farm_id: 6657
canonical_id: 7232640e-430f-403a-8975-a80b5a64d179
wind_farm_name: MarramWind
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.marramwind.co.uk/faqs
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: MarramWind FAQs
source_of_record_url: https://www.marramwind.co.uk/faqs
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Applications were submitted in January 2026, but no grant decision date was found. Therefore consent date remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6657
canonical_id: 7232640e-430f-403a-8975-a80b5a64d179
wind_farm_name: MarramWind
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.scottishpower.com/documents/d/guest/SPUK_2025_Annual_Accounts
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower annual accounts 2025
source_of_record_url: https://www.scottishpower.com/documents/d/guest/SPUK_2025_Annual_Accounts
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible authoritative source found a project FID. Current sources still describe MarramWind as in consenting/planning.


wind_farm_id: 6657
canonical_id: 7232640e-430f-403a-8975-a80b5a64d179
wind_farm_name: MarramWind
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.marramwind.co.uk/faqs
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: MarramWind FAQs
source_of_record_url: https://www.marramwind.co.uk/faqs
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No first-power milestone is available because the project has not yet been consented or constructed.


wind_farm_id: 6657
canonical_id: 7232640e-430f-403a-8975-a80b5a64d179
wind_farm_name: MarramWind
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Licence Application 1
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.marramwind.co.uk/userfiles/file/2025_12_17_-_MarramWind_-_Marine_Licence_Application_1_-_Generating_Station_Phases_1-3.pdf

research_summary:
No commissioning date is confirmed. The marine licence application says construction is expected to commence in 2030, but that is not a commissioning date.


wind_farm_id: 6660
canonical_id: b1d0ac2f-3897-4c95-b89f-05363500f5b7
wind_farm_name: Muir Mhor
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Muir Mhòr Offshore Wind Farm; historic / alternative names: Mara Mhòr, Muir Mhor
research_value: Muir Mhòr Offshore Wind Farm; historic / alternative names: Mara Mhòr, Muir Mhor
citation_url: https://muirmhor.co.uk/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Muir Mhòr project site
source_of_record_url: https://muirmhor.co.uk/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project website identifies the current name as Muir Mhòr Offshore Wind Farm, while an older project news item on the same official site uses the historic project name Mara Mhòr. The plain-ASCII variant Muir Mhor appears in some page titles / logos.


wind_farm_id: 6660
canonical_id: b1d0ac2f-3897-4c95-b89f-05363500f5b7
wind_farm_name: Muir Mhor
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34210.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Fred. Olsen Seawind and Vattenfall (50/50 JV historically); current ownership: Fred. Olsen Seawind 100% agreed, subject to approval; operator / project lead: Muir Mhòr Offshore Wind Farm Ltd project team / project director David Hinshelwood

resolved_value:
Developer: Fred. Olsen Seawind and Vattenfall (50/50 JV historically); current ownership: Fred. Olsen Seawind 100% agreed, subject to approval; operator / project lead: Muir Mhòr Offshore Wind Farm Ltd project team / project director David Hinshelwood

citation_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/uk/newsroom/pressreleases/2026/change-of-ownership-agreed-for-muir-mhor-floating-offshore-wind-farm

research_summary:
Freshest ownership source is Vattenfall’s 22/04/2026 press release stating Fred. Olsen Seawind will assume 100% ownership, subject to Crown Estate Scotland approval. Before that, dated project news on 19/06/2025 confirmed a 50/50 joint venture between Fred. Olsen Seawind and Vattenfall. No separate long-term operator distinct from the project company was clearly confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/uk/newsroom/pressreleases/2026/change-of-ownership-agreed-for-muir-mhor-floating-offshore-wind-farm


wind_farm_id: 6660
canonical_id: b1d0ac2f-3897-4c95-b89f-05363500f5b7
wind_farm_name: Muir Mhor
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
17/01/2022 award to Fred. Olsen Seawind + Vattenfall partnership; 19/06/2025 still 50/50 JV; 22/04/2026 Vattenfall agreed sale of its 50% stake to Fred. Olsen Seawind, subject to approvals

research_value:
17/01/2022 award to Fred. Olsen Seawind + Vattenfall partnership; 19/06/2025 still 50/50 JV; 22/04/2026 Vattenfall agreed sale of its 50% stake to Fred. Olsen Seawind, subject to approvals

citation_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/uk/newsroom/pressreleases/2026/change-of-ownership-agreed-for-muir-mhor-floating-offshore-wind-farm

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on is 22/04/2026. Historic award announcements and 2025 project news show the JV structure; the April 2026 Vattenfall release is the clearest current ownership update and indicates the transfer is agreed but not yet finally completed because approvals are still required.


wind_farm_id: 6660
canonical_id: b1d0ac2f-3897-4c95-b89f-05363500f5b7
wind_farm_name: Muir Mhor
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
research_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_fact_id: 34211.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Offshore Wind Scotland news item
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.offshorewindscotland.org.uk/news/2024/december/10/muir-mhor-submits-floating-wind-planning-application/

research_summary:
This exact Boundary Layer label fits best. Offshore Section 36 and marine licence applications were submitted in 12/2024 and are still awaiting determination; onshore consent was approved in 06/2025, but offshore consent has not yet been granted.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.offshorewindscotland.org.uk/news/2024/december/10/muir-mhor-submits-floating-wind-planning-application/


wind_farm_id: 6660
canonical_id: b1d0ac2f-3897-4c95-b89f-05363500f5b7
wind_farm_name: Muir Mhor
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 798 MW
resolved_value: 798 MW
research_value: 798 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34212.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Crown Estate Scotland offshore wind sector profile
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.crownestatescotland.com/sites/default/files/2023-11/OSW-factsheet-web-sept23-sector-profile.pdf

research_summary:
There is a live project-design nuance: current consent material often says “approximately 1GW” / “up to 1GW”, while Crown Estate Scotland’s offshore wind sector profile lists Muir Mhor 798 MW. Given the authoritative row context and Crown Estate Scotland’s project list, 798 MW is the best source-of-record value for planned capacity, while newer planning material indicates a potentially higher rounded project narrative.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.crownestatescotland.com/sites/default/files/2023-11/OSW-factsheet-web-sept23-sector-profile.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6660
canonical_id: b1d0ac2f-3897-4c95-b89f-05363500f5b7
wind_farm_name: Muir Mhor
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://muirmhor.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/241205-MM-Planning-Statement.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Muir Mhòr Onshore Planning Statement
source_of_record_url: https://muirmhor.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/241205-MM-Planning-Statement.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible source clearly labels a project MEC. The onshore planning statement says the wind farm itself is approximately 1GW, while the onshore transmission works were intentionally designed to accommodate up to 2GW as the first phase of a coordinated connection. That 2GW figure is connection infrastructure design capacity, not clearly the project’s MEC, so MEC is left as Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6660
canonical_id: b1d0ac2f-3897-4c95-b89f-05363500f5b7
wind_farm_name: Muir Mhor
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Muir Mhòr EIAR Volume 1 Chapter 3
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://muirmhor.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/MMH-GBE-A004-ENV-0006-103-EIAR-Volume-1-Chapter-3-Project-Description.pdf

research_summary:
Project-specific offshore EIAR material explicitly says several WTG design options are under consideration and consent is sought using a design envelope, not a selected turbine model. No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided in the task context, so no fallback applies.

source_of_record_url:
https://muirmhor.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/MMH-GBE-A004-ENV-0006-103-EIAR-Volume-1-Chapter-3-Project-Description.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6660
canonical_id: b1d0ac2f-3897-4c95-b89f-05363500f5b7
wind_farm_name: Muir Mhor
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Muir Mhòr EIAR Volume 1 Chapter 3
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://muirmhor.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/MMH-GBE-A004-ENV-0006-103-EIAR-Volume-1-Chapter-3-Project-Description.pdf

research_summary:
No project-specific source confirms an OEM. The consent documents retain procurement optionality and do not identify a selected manufacturer.


wind_farm_id: 6660
canonical_id: b1d0ac2f-3897-4c95-b89f-05363500f5b7
wind_farm_name: Muir Mhor
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Muir Mhòr EIAR Volume 1 Chapter 3
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific source confirms the turbine rating. The design-envelope approach states final turbine numbers depend on the capacity of the individual WTGs selected later.


wind_farm_id: 6660
canonical_id: b1d0ac2f-3897-4c95-b89f-05363500f5b7
wind_farm_name: Muir Mhor
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Muir Mhòr EIAR Volume 1 Chapter 3
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The offshore EIAR confirms only a maximum rotor diameter of 300 m within the consent envelope; this is not a selected project turbine specification, so the project rotor diameter remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6660
canonical_id: b1d0ac2f-3897-4c95-b89f-05363500f5b7
wind_farm_name: Muir Mhor
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Muir Mhòr EIAR Volume 1 Chapter 3
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The offshore EIAR gives only a maximum hub height of 195 m above mean sea level within the consent envelope and does not confirm the final hub height for the project. No linked EuroWindWakes fallback was available in the task context.


wind_farm_id: 6660
canonical_id: b1d0ac2f-3897-4c95-b89f-05363500f5b7
wind_farm_name: Muir Mhor
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: 0
resolved_fact_id: 34213.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No turbines are installed because the project remains pre-consent / pre-construction. For planned design, the offshore consent envelope allows up to 67 WTGs. This differs from the non-web validation signal of 0, but only because that validation reflects currently installed turbines rather than the planned scheme envelope.


wind_farm_id: 6660
canonical_id: b1d0ac2f-3897-4c95-b89f-05363500f5b7
wind_farm_name: Muir Mhor
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34214.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://muirmhor.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/MMOWFL-Section-36-Application-Letter.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Muir Mhòr Section 36 application letter
source_of_record_url: https://muirmhor.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/MMOWFL-Section-36-Application-Letter.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Floating foundations for turbines; candidate types include TLP, buoy/barge, semi-submersible and multi-tower semi-submersible; up to two OEPs on fixed foundations

resolved_value:
Floating foundations for turbines; candidate types include TLP, buoy/barge, semi-submersible and multi-tower semi-submersible; up to two OEPs on fixed foundations

research_summary:
The turbine foundations are clearly floating, but the final floating substructure type has not been selected. The EIAR lists multiple candidate floating foundation topologies, so the safest confirmed value is floating foundations, with design options noted.


wind_farm_id: 6660
canonical_id: b1d0ac2f-3897-4c95-b89f-05363500f5b7
wind_farm_name: Muir Mhor
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Offshore consent has not yet been granted. Onshore planning permission in principle was approved on 19/06/2025, but that is not the offshore wind farm consent date requested here.


wind_farm_id: 6660
canonical_id: b1d0ac2f-3897-4c95-b89f-05363500f5b7
wind_farm_name: Muir Mhor
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.vattenfall.co.uk/our-projects/muir-mhor
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.vattenfall.co.uk/our-projects/muir-mhor
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No authoritative accessible source found a project FID. The project remains in consenting and is described as awaiting offshore consent determination.


wind_farm_id: 6660
canonical_id: b1d0ac2f-3897-4c95-b89f-05363500f5b7
wind_farm_name: Muir Mhor
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No first power date is confirmed. Sources only indicate expected operation / generation in the early 2030s.


wind_farm_id: 6660
canonical_id: b1d0ac2f-3897-4c95-b89f-05363500f5b7
wind_farm_name: Muir Mhor
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No commissioning date is confirmed. Public sources only refer to operation in the early 2030s, subject to consent approval.


wind_farm_id: 6661
canonical_id: b2116960-9447-4fa6-8800-21df9698895d
wind_farm_name: Stoura Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://stouraoffshorewind.com/home
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Stoura Offshore Wind Farm website
source_of_record_url: https://stouraoffshorewind.com/home
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Stoura Offshore Wind Farm; historic / alternative names: Stoura Wind Farm, Sealtainn, ScotWind NE1 ESB project

research_value:
Stoura Offshore Wind Farm; historic / alternative names: Stoura Wind Farm, Sealtainn, ScotWind NE1 ESB project

research_summary:
ESB’s project website uses Stoura Offshore Wind Farm as the current project name. ESB’s 01/11/2023 naming announcement says the project “will now be called – Stoura Wind Farm – which replaces the old name of Sealtainn.” Crown Estate Scotland identifies the underlying ScotWind award as ESB’s NE1 500 MW floating project.


wind_farm_id: 6661
canonical_id: b2116960-9447-4fa6-8800-21df9698895d
wind_farm_name: Stoura Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34232.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://stouraoffshorewind.com/news-Item14
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ESB Submits Offshore Scoping Report for Stoura Wind Farm
source_of_record_url: https://stouraoffshorewind.com/news-Item14
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: ESB; current owner(s): Not confirmed beyond ESB-controlled development; equity partners and ownership percentages: Not confirmed; operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: ESB; current owner(s): Not confirmed beyond ESB-controlled development; equity partners and ownership percentages: Not confirmed; operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
The freshest ownership/developer evidence relied on is the Stoura website copyright 2025 / live project pages and ESB’s 15/07/2025 project update, both stating ESB is developing the project. No current official source found that lists any non-ESB equity partner or reconciled ownership percentages, so current ownership split and operator are left Not confirmed rather than inferred.


wind_farm_id: 6661
canonical_id: b2116960-9447-4fa6-8800-21df9698895d
wind_farm_name: Stoura Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: ESB-led since ScotWind award in 2022; no later official transfer or JV restructuring confirmed
research_value: ESB-led since ScotWind award in 2022; no later official transfer or JV restructuring confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Crown Estate Scotland ScotWind awards with project partners PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.crownestatescotland.com/sites/default/files/2023-07/scotwind-awards-with-project-partners-november-2022.pdf

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on is 15/07/2025 from ESB’s project update confirming ESB continues to progress the project. Crown Estate Scotland’s 2022 ScotWind award material shows the lead applicant as ESB Asset Development with ESB group entities as project partners. No newer official source found showing a transfer, farm-down, or JV with stated percentages.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.crownestatescotland.com/sites/default/files/2023-07/scotwind-awards-with-project-partners-november-2022.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6661
canonical_id: b2116960-9447-4fa6-8800-21df9698895d
wind_farm_name: Stoura Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
resolved_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
research_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
resolved_fact_id: 34233.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://stouraoffshorewind.com/news-Item14
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ESB Submits Offshore Scoping Report for Stoura Wind Farm
source_of_record_url: https://stouraoffshorewind.com/news-Item14
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Crown Estate Scotland confirms the project received a ScotWind agreement. ESB’s dated 13/08/2024 release said planning applications were targeted by 2028, indicating no consent application had yet been submitted at that time. ESB’s 15/07/2025 update says the offshore scoping report was submitted to Marine Directorate, which is still pre-application EIA scoping rather than a consent application. On the Boundary Layer taxonomy, the closest exact label is Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning.


wind_farm_id: 6661
canonical_id: b2116960-9447-4fa6-8800-21df9698895d
wind_farm_name: Stoura Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 500 MW
resolved_value: 500 MW
research_value: 500 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34234.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://stouraoffshorewind.com/info
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Stoura project information page
source_of_record_url: https://stouraoffshorewind.com/info
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
ESB’s current project information page states the wind farm’s estimated installed capacity is 500 MW. Crown Estate Scotland’s ScotWind award material independently lists ESB’s NE1 project at 500 MW. This aligns with the supplied database context.


wind_farm_id: 6661
canonical_id: b2116960-9447-4fa6-8800-21df9698895d
wind_farm_name: Stoura Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://stouraoffshorewind.com/info
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Stoura project information page
source_of_record_url: https://stouraoffshorewind.com/info
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible official source located that explicitly states a grid/export MEC value distinct from planned installed capacity. ESB’s public materials cite project capacity only; the available Crown Estate Scotland sources likewise state project capacity, not MEC.


wind_farm_id: 6661
canonical_id: b2116960-9447-4fa6-8800-21df9698895d
wind_farm_name: Stoura Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.stouraoffshorewind.com/faq.html
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Stoura FAQ
source_of_record_url: https://www.stouraoffshorewind.com/faq.html
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources reviewed do not name a turbine model. ESB’s FAQ says it is still evaluating floating wind concepts, and no linked EuroWindWakes turbine row was provided in the prompt, so the field remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6661
canonical_id: b2116960-9447-4fa6-8800-21df9698895d
wind_farm_name: Stoura Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.stouraoffshorewind.com/faq.html
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Stoura FAQ
source_of_record_url: https://www.stouraoffshorewind.com/faq.html
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific official source found that identifies the turbine OEM. ESB materials remain at concept-selection stage and do not specify turbine supplier.


wind_farm_id: 6661
canonical_id: b2116960-9447-4fa6-8800-21df9698895d
wind_farm_name: Stoura Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.stouraoffshorewind.com/faq.html
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Stoura FAQ
source_of_record_url: https://www.stouraoffshorewind.com/faq.html
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific source found stating planned MW per turbine. Because no linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was supplied, this cannot be backfilled and is left Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6661
canonical_id: b2116960-9447-4fa6-8800-21df9698895d
wind_farm_name: Stoura Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.stouraoffshorewind.com/faq.html
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Stoura FAQ
source_of_record_url: https://www.stouraoffshorewind.com/faq.html
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible project-specific source found stating rotor diameter, and turbine platform selection is still unresolved.


wind_farm_id: 6661
canonical_id: b2116960-9447-4fa6-8800-21df9698895d
wind_farm_name: Stoura Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.stouraoffshorewind.com/faq.html
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Stoura FAQ
source_of_record_url: https://www.stouraoffshorewind.com/faq.html
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible project-specific source found stating hub height. Per instruction, this is not inferred from generic turbine platforms.


wind_farm_id: 6661
canonical_id: b2116960-9447-4fa6-8800-21df9698895d
wind_farm_name: Stoura Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: 0
resolved_fact_id: 34235.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.stouraoffshorewind.com/faq.html
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Stoura FAQ
source_of_record_url: https://www.stouraoffshorewind.com/faq.html
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No web source found giving a committed turbine count; ESB is still evaluating concepts and has not published turbine numbers. For a lease-awarded, pre-application project with no confirmed turbine selection, the supplied non-web validation signal of 0 is the best cross-check and is consistent with the absence of web-confirmed turbine numbers.


wind_farm_id: 6661
canonical_id: b2116960-9447-4fa6-8800-21df9698895d
wind_farm_name: Stoura Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Floating foundations; specific floater subtype and anchors not confirmed
resolved_value: Floating foundations; specific floater subtype and anchors not confirmed
research_value: Floating foundations; specific floater subtype and anchors not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 34236.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Crown Estate Scotland ScotWind awards with project partners PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.crownestatescotland.com/sites/default/files/2023-07/scotwind-awards-with-project-partners-november-2022.pdf

research_summary:
ESB’s FAQ explicitly describes the project as floating offshore wind and says ESB is evaluating different floating wind concepts. Crown Estate Scotland’s ScotWind award material also lists the ESB NE1 project foundation type as Floating. Specific floater subtype remains unconfirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6661
canonical_id: b2116960-9447-4fa6-8800-21df9698895d
wind_farm_name: Stoura Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://stouraoffshorewind.com/news-Item14
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ESB Submits Offshore Scoping Report for Stoura Wind Farm
source_of_record_url: https://stouraoffshorewind.com/news-Item14
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No consent has been evidenced. ESB’s 13/08/2024 release said planning applications were expected by 2028, and the 15/07/2025 milestone was only offshore scoping submission, not consent.


wind_farm_id: 6661
canonical_id: b2116960-9447-4fa6-8800-21df9698895d
wind_farm_name: Stoura Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://stouraoffshorewind.com/news-Item14
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ESB Submits Offshore Scoping Report for Stoura Wind Farm
source_of_record_url: https://stouraoffshorewind.com/news-Item14
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No official source found indicating FID has been taken; project remains in early-stage development and pre-application scoping.


wind_farm_id: 6661
canonical_id: b2116960-9447-4fa6-8800-21df9698895d
wind_farm_name: Stoura Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ESB public exhibition press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://esb.ie/news---insights/press-releases/article/2024/08/13/esb-announce-details-of-first-public-exhibition-for-stoura-floating-offshore-wind-farm

research_summary:
No official source found confirming first power. ESB’s public timeline points to operation in the mid-2030s, but not a dated first-power milestone.

source_of_record_url:
https://esb.ie/news---insights/press-releases/article/2024/08/13/esb-announce-details-of-first-public-exhibition-for-stoura-floating-offshore-wind-farm


wind_farm_id: 6661
canonical_id: b2116960-9447-4fa6-8800-21df9698895d
wind_farm_name: Stoura Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.stouraoffshorewind.com/Docs/PublicExhibitionBoards2025.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Stoura Public Exhibition Boards 2025
source_of_record_url: https://www.stouraoffshorewind.com/Docs/PublicExhibitionBoards2025.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No official source found confirming a commissioning date. Public-facing ESB material indicates only indicative operational timing in the mid-2030s / 2036 exhibition timeline, not a formal commissioning milestone.


wind_farm_id: 6662
canonical_id: 50da0d17-7eb6-4561-8bba-6dfbb1ec83ec
wind_farm_name: Arven South
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Mainstream Renewable Power news release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Arven South; alternative context: ScotWind area 18, developed jointly within the wider Arven Offshore Wind Farm scheme

research_value:
Arven South; alternative context: ScotWind area 18, developed jointly within the wider Arven Offshore Wind Farm scheme

citation_url:
https://www.mainstreamrp.com/news/mainstream-renewable-power-and-ocean-winds-partner-on-second-scotwind-floating-offshore-wind-site/

research_summary:
Crown Estate Scotland’s 22/08/2022 clearing announcement identifies the 500 MW Shetland floating project as map reference 18 awarded to Ocean Winds. Mainstream’s dated 17/08/2023 release says this separate 500 MW site was then partnered and folded into the wider Arven footprint. The project website and HRA glossary confirm Arven South remains a separate contractual entity under the Crown Estate Scotland lease while being jointly developed with Arven.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.mainstreamrp.com/news/mainstream-renewable-power-and-ocean-winds-partner-on-second-scotwind-floating-offshore-wind-site/


wind_farm_id: 6662
canonical_id: 50da0d17-7eb6-4561-8bba-6dfbb1ec83ec
wind_farm_name: Arven South
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34237.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/arven_offshore_wind_farm_-_scoping_opinion.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate scoping opinion for Arven Offshore Wind Farm
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/arven_offshore_wind_farm_-_scoping_opinion.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Mainstream Renewable Power and Ocean Winds; current owners: Mainstream Renewable Power 50% / Ocean Winds 50%; operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: Mainstream Renewable Power and Ocean Winds; current owners: Mainstream Renewable Power 50% / Ocean Winds 50%; operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
Freshest ownership/status source used: the Marine Directorate scoping opinion dated 05/09/2024 confirms Arven Offshore Wind Farm Limited and Arven South Limited are both equally controlled by Ocean Winds and Mainstream Renewable Power. Ocean Winds’ current project page also describes Arven and Arven South as a 50-50 partnership between Ocean Winds and Mainstream Renewable Power. No separate operator has been clearly identified.


wind_farm_id: 6662
canonical_id: 50da0d17-7eb6-4561-8bba-6dfbb1ec83ec
wind_farm_name: Arven South
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Mainstream Renewable Power news release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
22/08/2022: Ocean Winds awarded the 500 MW ScotWind clearing site; 17/08/2023: Mainstream acquired 50% of the holding company for the 500 MW site and Arven South moved to a 50:50 JV with Ocean Winds

research_value:
22/08/2022: Ocean Winds awarded the 500 MW ScotWind clearing site; 17/08/2023: Mainstream acquired 50% of the holding company for the 500 MW site and Arven South moved to a 50:50 JV with Ocean Winds

citation_url:
https://www.mainstreamrp.com/news/mainstream-renewable-power-and-ocean-winds-partner-on-second-scotwind-floating-offshore-wind-site/

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on for the transfer history is Mainstream’s 17/08/2023 release, which explicitly says Ocean Winds was separately awarded the 500 MW site and Mainstream then completed acquisition of a 50% shareholding in Ocean Winds’ holding company. The 05/09/2024 scoping opinion confirms equal control thereafter.


wind_farm_id: 6662
canonical_id: 50da0d17-7eb6-4561-8bba-6dfbb1ec83ec
wind_farm_name: Arven South
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
research_value: In Planning / Consent Application Submitted
resolved_fact_id: 34238.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/arven_offshore_wind_farm_-_scoping_opinion.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate scoping opinion for Arven Offshore Wind Farm
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/arven_offshore_wind_farm_-_scoping_opinion.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
This is no longer just lease-awarded/pre-planning. Scottish Ministers received the offshore scoping report on 17/05/2024 and issued a scoping opinion on 05/09/2024. Ocean Winds says Arven is in its early planning scoping stage, with offshore scoping completed in 2024 and onshore scoping consultation/submission expected in late 2025. Because a project-specific planning/scoping process is underway but no consent decision is evident, the closest exact Boundary Layer status is In Planning / Consent Application Submitted.


wind_farm_id: 6662
canonical_id: 50da0d17-7eb6-4561-8bba-6dfbb1ec83ec
wind_farm_name: Arven South
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 500 MW
resolved_value: 500 MW
research_value: 500 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34239.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Arven South SCDS Outlook
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.crownestatescotland.com/sites/default/files/2023-12/2023%20Arven%20South%20SCDS%20Outlook.pdf

research_summary:
Crown Estate Scotland’s 2022 clearing announcement lists map reference 18 at 500 MW. Crown Estate Scotland’s Arven South SCDS Outlook also states “Arven South is 500 MW”, and the Arven project website describes the southern site as 500 MW within the wider 2.3 GW scheme.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.crownestatescotland.com/sites/default/files/2023-12/2023%20Arven%20South%20SCDS%20Outlook.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6662
canonical_id: 50da0d17-7eb6-4561-8bba-6dfbb1ec83ec
wind_farm_name: Arven South
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.arvenoffshorewind.com/the-project/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Arven project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.arvenoffshorewind.com/the-project/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Open sources confirm planned generating capacity, but I did not find a project-specific MEC figure for Arven South alone. The accessible scoping and project pages describe installed capacity and infrastructure concepts but do not clearly state a separate MEC value for the 500 MW Arven South entity.


wind_farm_id: 6662
canonical_id: 50da0d17-7eb6-4561-8bba-6dfbb1ec83ec
wind_farm_name: Arven South
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/arven_offshore_wind_farm_-_scoping_opinion.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate scoping opinion for Arven Offshore Wind Farm
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/arven_offshore_wind_farm_-_scoping_opinion.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific accessible source found that names a turbine model for Arven South. The scoping materials use a design-envelope approach only. Per instruction, turbine specifics are left unconfirmed rather than inferred from generic turbine platforms.


wind_farm_id: 6662
canonical_id: 50da0d17-7eb6-4561-8bba-6dfbb1ec83ec
wind_farm_name: Arven South
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/arven_offshore_wind_farm_-_scoping_opinion.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate scoping opinion for Arven Offshore Wind Farm
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/arven_offshore_wind_farm_-_scoping_opinion.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible project-specific source explicitly identifies the OEM for Arven South. The available planning-stage documents keep turbine selection open.


wind_farm_id: 6662
canonical_id: 50da0d17-7eb6-4561-8bba-6dfbb1ec83ec
wind_farm_name: Arven South
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Arven HRA Screening Report
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.arvenoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/HRA-Screening-Report-%E2%80%93-Arven-Offshore-Wind-Farm.pdf

research_summary:
No project-specific source explicitly states the selected turbine rating for Arven South. The project remains at design-envelope stage.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.arvenoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/HRA-Screening-Report-%E2%80%93-Arven-Offshore-Wind-Farm.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6662
canonical_id: 50da0d17-7eb6-4561-8bba-6dfbb1ec83ec
wind_farm_name: Arven South
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/arven_offshore_wind_farm_-_scoping_opinion.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate scoping opinion for Arven Offshore Wind Farm
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/arven_offshore_wind_farm_-_scoping_opinion.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The scoping opinion gives only a maximum design-envelope rotor blade diameter for the combined Arven proposed development, not a chosen Arven South turbine specification. To avoid inference, rotor diameter is not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6662
canonical_id: 50da0d17-7eb6-4561-8bba-6dfbb1ec83ec
wind_farm_name: Arven South
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/arven_offshore_wind_farm_-_scoping_opinion.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate scoping opinion for Arven Offshore Wind Farm
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/arven_offshore_wind_farm_-_scoping_opinion.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The accessible project-specific sources give design-envelope nacelle and tip heights for the combined development, but not a confirmed selected hub height for Arven South. No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided in context, so Not confirmed is appropriate.


wind_farm_id: 6662
canonical_id: 50da0d17-7eb6-4561-8bba-6dfbb1ec83ec
wind_farm_name: Arven South
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 8811.0
resolved_source_type: emodnet
resolved_source_name: EMODnet Human Activities
resolved_source_detail: EMODnet Jan 2026
citation_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMODnet Human Activities
source_of_record_type: public data portal
source_of_record_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
source_of_record_licence: Free and open public portal
research_source_name: Arven HRA Screening Report
research_source_type: project document
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Web sources only provide a combined design-envelope maximum of 161 WTGs across Arven plus Arven South, not a confirmed count for the 500 MW Arven South lease/project alone. This aligns with the non-web validation signal of 0 in the sense that no built turbines / no confirmed project-specific turbine count is yet evidenced for this pre-consent project.

research_source_url:
https://www.arvenoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/HRA-Screening-Report-%E2%80%93-Arven-Offshore-Wind-Farm.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6662
canonical_id: 50da0d17-7eb6-4561-8bba-6dfbb1ec83ec
wind_farm_name: Arven South
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34240.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/arven_offshore_wind_farm_-_scoping_opinion.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate scoping opinion for Arven Offshore Wind Farm
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/arven_offshore_wind_farm_-_scoping_opinion.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Floating foundations; candidate floating substructure types under consideration include barge, semi-submersible, spar, and tension-leg platform; OSP foundations bottom-fixed

resolved_value:
Floating foundations; candidate floating substructure types under consideration include barge, semi-submersible, spar, and tension-leg platform; OSP foundations bottom-fixed

research_summary:
Project-specific scoping sources are explicit that the wind turbine generators will use floating foundations because of water depth. However, no single final floating substructure type has been selected yet; the design envelope includes several candidate types. Separate offshore substation platform foundations may be bottom-fixed.


wind_farm_id: 6662
canonical_id: 50da0d17-7eb6-4561-8bba-6dfbb1ec83ec
wind_farm_name: Arven South
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/arven_offshore_wind_farm_-_scoping_opinion.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate scoping opinion for Arven Offshore Wind Farm
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/arven_offshore_wind_farm_-_scoping_opinion.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project consent has been evidenced. The 05/09/2024 scoping opinion explicitly refers to future section 36 consent and marine licence applications, indicating consent had not yet been granted.


wind_farm_id: 6662
canonical_id: 50da0d17-7eb6-4561-8bba-6dfbb1ec83ec
wind_farm_name: Arven South
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.oceanwinds.com/projects/arven/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ocean Winds Arven project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.oceanwinds.com/projects/arven/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible authoritative source found indicating FID for Arven South. The project remains in planning/scoping.


wind_farm_id: 6662
canonical_id: 50da0d17-7eb6-4561-8bba-6dfbb1ec83ec
wind_farm_name: Arven South
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Arven South SCDS Outlook
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.crownestatescotland.com/sites/default/files/2023-12/2023%20Arven%20South%20SCDS%20Outlook.pdf

research_summary:
No first-power milestone exists in the sources reviewed. The SCDS outlook references operation in the early 2030s at a high level, but not a first-power date and not as a secured milestone.


wind_farm_id: 6662
canonical_id: 50da0d17-7eb6-4561-8bba-6dfbb1ec83ec
wind_farm_name: Arven South
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.oceanwinds.com/projects/arven/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ocean Winds Arven project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.oceanwinds.com/projects/arven/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No full commissioning date is confirmed in accessible authoritative sources. The project is still in planning/scoping.


wind_farm_id: 6663
canonical_id: a0fa7e08-6b7b-4e21-aa1f-6912d85d7bbf
wind_farm_name: Arven Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Arven Offshore Wind Farm; combined project includes Arven and Arven South
research_value: Arven Offshore Wind Farm; combined project includes Arven and Arven South
citation_url: https://www.arvenoffshorewind.com/the-project/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Arven project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.arvenoffshorewind.com/the-project/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The current project website describes Arven as a 2.3 GW development “spanning two sites,” namely a 1.8 GW site in the NE1 area plus a 500 MW site to the south. This resolves the name/capacity ambiguity: Crown Estate Scotland’s 22/08/2022 clearing announcement used “Arven Offshore Wind Farm” for the 1.8 GW award, while the project was expanded and jointly branded as a single Arven development in 2023.


wind_farm_id: 6663
canonical_id: a0fa7e08-6b7b-4e21-aa1f-6912d85d7bbf
wind_farm_name: Arven Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34241.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.arvenoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Arven-Project-Summary-web.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Arven Project Summary February 2024
source_of_record_url: https://www.arvenoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Arven-Project-Summary-web.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Ocean Winds and Mainstream Renewable Power; Current owners: 50% Ocean Winds, 50% Mainstream Renewable Power; Operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: Ocean Winds and Mainstream Renewable Power; Current owners: 50% Ocean Winds, 50% Mainstream Renewable Power; Operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
Freshest dated authoritative source relied on is the 30/10/2024 Arven project update, which describes Arven as “a ... joint-venture between Ocean Winds and Mainstream Renewable Power.” The February 2024 project summary states Arven is being developed by a 50/50 joint venture between the two companies. I did not find a newer dated official source identifying a separate operator, so operator remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6663
canonical_id: a0fa7e08-6b7b-4e21-aa1f-6912d85d7bbf
wind_farm_name: Arven Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Arven 7 August 2023 announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
22/08/2022: separate NE1 clearing awards of 1,800 MW to Mainstream Renewable Power and 500 MW to Ocean Winds; 07/08/2023 onward: combined into 50/50 Arven joint venture

research_value:
22/08/2022: separate NE1 clearing awards of 1,800 MW to Mainstream Renewable Power and 500 MW to Ocean Winds; 07/08/2023 onward: combined into 50/50 Arven joint venture

citation_url:
https://www.arvenoffshorewind.com/mainstream-renewable-power-and-ocean-winds-partner-on-second-scotwind-floating-offshore-wind-site/

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on is 30/10/2024 for current JV status, with the 07/08/2023 Arven announcement explaining that Mainstream acquired 50% of Ocean Winds’ holding company for the 500 MW site so the two sites could be developed jointly. Crown Estate Scotland’s 22/08/2022 announcement shows the prior separate award structure.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.arvenoffshorewind.com/mainstream-renewable-power-and-ocean-winds-partner-on-second-scotwind-floating-offshore-wind-site/


wind_farm_id: 6663
canonical_id: a0fa7e08-6b7b-4e21-aa1f-6912d85d7bbf
wind_farm_name: Arven Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
resolved_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
research_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
resolved_fact_id: 34242.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.arvenoffshorewind.com/the-project/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Arven project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.arvenoffshorewind.com/the-project/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
This is the closest exact Boundary Layer label. Although offshore scoping has been undertaken and a Scoping Opinion dated 05/09/2024 has been issued, the project website and document library indicate the project is still moving toward future consent applications rather than having submitted them. The February 2024 summary said consent applications were expected later; the more recent project timeline page now points to EIA work in 2027-28 and construction only in the early 2030s.


wind_farm_id: 6663
canonical_id: a0fa7e08-6b7b-4e21-aa1f-6912d85d7bbf
wind_farm_name: Arven Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2300 MW
resolved_value: 2300 MW
research_value: 2300 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34243.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.arvenoffshorewind.com/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Arven homepage
source_of_record_url: https://www.arvenoffshorewind.com/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific sources consistently describe Arven as a 2.3 GW combined development. This differs from the database context row of 1800 MW, which aligns with the original 2022 Crown Estate Scotland clearing award for the main Arven site only, before Arven South was folded into the combined project identity.


wind_farm_id: 6663
canonical_id: a0fa7e08-6b7b-4e21-aa1f-6912d85d7bbf
wind_farm_name: Arven Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.arvenoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Arven-Project-Summary-web.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Arven Project Summary February 2024
source_of_record_url: https://www.arvenoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Arven-Project-Summary-web.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I found no open authoritative source that explicitly states a project MEC/export-capacity figure distinct from installed capacity. Available sources discuss installed capacity and note that grid connection options remain under consideration by National Grid / HND processes, but do not confirm an MEC value.


wind_farm_id: 6663
canonical_id: a0fa7e08-6b7b-4e21-aa1f-6912d85d7bbf
wind_farm_name: Arven Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/arven_offshore_wind_farm_-_scoping_opinion.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate scoping opinion
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/arven_offshore_wind_farm_-_scoping_opinion.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public sector webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The 2024 scoping opinion gives only a broad design envelope and does not name a selected turbine model. No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided in the prompt, so per instruction this remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6663
canonical_id: a0fa7e08-6b7b-4e21-aa1f-6912d85d7bbf
wind_farm_name: Arven Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/arven_offshore_wind_farm_-_scoping_opinion.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate scoping opinion
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/arven_offshore_wind_farm_-_scoping_opinion.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public sector webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific official or regulatory source found names a selected turbine OEM. The scoping-stage documents remain technology-envelope based only.


wind_farm_id: 6663
canonical_id: a0fa7e08-6b7b-4e21-aa1f-6912d85d7bbf
wind_farm_name: Arven Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/arven_offshore_wind_farm_-_scoping_opinion.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate scoping opinion
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/arven_offshore_wind_farm_-_scoping_opinion.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public sector webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific source confirms turbine rating. The scoping opinion confirms only a maximum turbine count and broad envelope, not a selected unit size.


wind_farm_id: 6663
canonical_id: a0fa7e08-6b7b-4e21-aa1f-6912d85d7bbf
wind_farm_name: Arven Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/arven_offshore_wind_farm_-_scoping_opinion.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate scoping opinion
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/arven_offshore_wind_farm_-_scoping_opinion.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public sector webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The scoping opinion gives only an indicative maximum rotor blade diameter of up to 310 m for design-envelope assessment, not a chosen project turbine. Per instruction, I do not treat that as a confirmed as-built/planned rotor diameter.


wind_farm_id: 6663
canonical_id: a0fa7e08-6b7b-4e21-aa1f-6912d85d7bbf
wind_farm_name: Arven Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/arven_offshore_wind_farm_-_scoping_opinion.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate scoping opinion
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/arven_offshore_wind_farm_-_scoping_opinion.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public sector webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific source confirms hub height. The scoping opinion gives a maximum nacelle height above LAT, which is not the same as a confirmed hub height specification for the selected turbine.


wind_farm_id: 6663
canonical_id: a0fa7e08-6b7b-4e21-aa1f-6912d85d7bbf
wind_farm_name: Arven Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 161 (maximum design-envelope count; final count not confirmed)
resolved_value: 161 (maximum design-envelope count; final count not confirmed)
research_value: 161 (maximum design-envelope count; final count not confirmed)
resolved_fact_id: 34244.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/arven_offshore_wind_farm_-_scoping_opinion.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate scoping opinion
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/arven_offshore_wind_farm_-_scoping_opinion.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public sector webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The only project-specific number found is the scoping-opinion envelope of “A maximum of 161 WTG” across the combined array areas. This does not align with the database validation hint of 0, which likely reflects an early-stage dataset value before turbine layout definition. Because the project is pre-consent and no final layout is fixed, I report the web-sourced maximum design-envelope count and note that the final turbine count is not yet confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6663
canonical_id: a0fa7e08-6b7b-4e21-aa1f-6912d85d7bbf
wind_farm_name: Arven Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Floating substructures
resolved_value: Floating substructures
research_value: Floating substructures
resolved_fact_id: 34245.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/arven_offshore_wind_farm_-_scoping_opinion.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate scoping opinion
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/arven_offshore_wind_farm_-_scoping_opinion.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public sector webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The scoping opinion explicitly states the WTG foundations “will consist of floating substructures,” reflecting the project’s floating-wind concept in deep water east of Shetland. No more specific foundation subtype was confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6663
canonical_id: a0fa7e08-6b7b-4e21-aa1f-6912d85d7bbf
wind_farm_name: Arven Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/arven_offshore_wind_farm_-_scoping_opinion.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Directorate scoping opinion
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/arven_offshore_wind_farm_-_scoping_opinion.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public sector webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No consent has been confirmed. The project is still in scoping / pre-application stages, so there is no project consent date to report.


wind_farm_id: 6663
canonical_id: a0fa7e08-6b7b-4e21-aa1f-6912d85d7bbf
wind_farm_name: Arven Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.arvenoffshorewind.com/the-project/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Arven project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.arvenoffshorewind.com/the-project/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No open authoritative source found indicates FID has been taken. The project remains at development / pre-consent stage.


wind_farm_id: 6663
canonical_id: a0fa7e08-6b7b-4e21-aa1f-6912d85d7bbf
wind_farm_name: Arven Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.arvenoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Arven-Project-Summary-web.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Arven Project Summary February 2024
source_of_record_url: https://www.arvenoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Arven-Project-Summary-web.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No first power date is confirmed. Project materials indicate only indicative operation in the mid-2030s.


wind_farm_id: 6663
canonical_id: a0fa7e08-6b7b-4e21-aa1f-6912d85d7bbf
wind_farm_name: Arven Offshore Wind Farm
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.arvenoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Arven-Project-Summary-web.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Arven Project Summary February 2024
source_of_record_url: https://www.arvenoffshorewind.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Arven-Project-Summary-web.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No full commissioning date is confirmed. Sources indicate only an indicative operations window in the mid-2030s.


wind_farm_id: 6665
canonical_id: 0da51837-f158-4d3e-a8f5-adebde7bbd4b
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 1
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.eib.org/en/projects/all/20240726
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: European Investment Bank project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.eib.org/en/projects/all/20240726
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 1 (PE I); alternative references: Princess Elisabeth I / Princesse Elisabeth 1 / Prinses Elisabeth 1

research_value:
Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 1 (PE I); alternative references: Princess Elisabeth I / Princesse Elisabeth 1 / Prinses Elisabeth 1

research_summary:
Official Belgian federal sources describe the asset as the first parcel/plot of the Princess Elisabeth Zone, with a 700 MW tender launched on 25/11/2024. EIB uses the project title “PRINCESS ELISABETH ZONE LOT 1 OFFSHORE WIND FARM,” confirming this is a specific lot rather than the full zone.


wind_farm_id: 6665
canonical_id: 0da51837-f158-4d3e-a8f5-adebde7bbd4b
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 1
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 36433.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://economie.fgov.be/en/news/launch-tender-procedure
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: FPS Economy tender launch
source_of_record_url: https://economie.fgov.be/en/news/launch-tender-procedure
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Belgian Federal Public Service Economy, DG Energy as concession-granting authority before award; current owner(s): Not confirmed; equity partners and ownership percentages: Not confirmed; operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: Belgian Federal Public Service Economy, DG Energy as concession-granting authority before award; current owner(s): Not confirmed; equity partners and ownership percentages: Not confirmed; operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
This is still an unawarded tender parcel rather than a privately awarded project company. The freshest source relied on for ownership status is the FPS Economy offshore tenders page updated in 2026, which says the PE I tender was cancelled on 02/07/2025 and will be relaunched in spring 2026; EIB likewise says the concession “will be awarded to a private promoter/concessionaire,” indicating no selected owner yet.


wind_farm_id: 6665
canonical_id: 0da51837-f158-4d3e-a8f5-adebde7bbd4b
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 1
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: FPS Economy offshore tenders
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
No private owner awarded yet; tender launched 25/11/2024, cancelled 02/07/2025, relaunch planned spring 2026

research_value:
No private owner awarded yet; tender launched 25/11/2024, cancelled 02/07/2025, relaunch planned spring 2026

citation_url:
https://economie.fgov.be/en/themes/energy/sources-and-carriers-energy/offshore/organisation-offshore-tenders

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on: FPS Economy 2026 update. The project moved from active tender to cancelled tender/relaunch status without an identified concessionaire. EIB’s 02/04/2025 release still described a future private concessionaire, which is consistent with no award having occurred.

source_of_record_url:
https://economie.fgov.be/en/themes/energy/sources-and-carriers-energy/offshore/organisation-offshore-tenders


wind_farm_id: 6665
canonical_id: 0da51837-f158-4d3e-a8f5-adebde7bbd4b
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 1
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Development Zone / lease area
resolved_value: Development Zone / lease area
research_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
resolved_fact_id: 36434.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: FPS Economy offshore tenders
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://economie.fgov.be/en/themes/energy/sources-and-carriers-energy/offshore/organisation-offshore-tenders

research_summary:
The project has a defined tender parcel, environmental consent, grid-connection framework and seabed/concession process, but no awarded private project company and no construction. None of the exact Boundary Layer labels perfectly fit a cancelled-and-to-be-relaunched tender; the closest is Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning because the lot exists within an awarded/defined state zone and no active project-specific development by a private concessionaire is underway after cancellation of the 2024-2025 tender.


wind_farm_id: 6665
canonical_id: 0da51837-f158-4d3e-a8f5-adebde7bbd4b
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 1
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 700 MW planned
resolved_value: 700 MW planned
research_value: 700 MW planned
resolved_fact_id: 36435.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://economie.fgov.be/en/news/launch-tender-procedure
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: FPS Economy tender launch
source_of_record_url: https://economie.fgov.be/en/news/launch-tender-procedure
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
FPS Economy’s 25/11/2024 launch states the concession concerns a 700 MW offshore wind farm in the first parcel. EIB independently describes “approximately 700 MW.”


wind_farm_id: 6665
canonical_id: 0da51837-f158-4d3e-a8f5-adebde7bbd4b
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 1
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 36436.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: FPS Economy offshore tenders
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Flexible connection approved for 700 MW; 255 MW fixed in the first phase before Boucle du Hainaut is ready

resolved_value:
Flexible connection approved for 700 MW; 255 MW fixed in the first phase before Boucle du Hainaut is ready

research_summary:
The current official wording available on the FPS Economy offshore tenders page is a flexible-connection statement rather than the earlier failed quote from the CREG page. FPS Economy says CREG approved a flexible connection for injection for Princess Elisabeth I on 25/10/2024, and that Elia’s formal reassessment concluded 255 MW are fixed in the first phase before Boucle du Hainaut is ready. This supports keeping the phased grid-access interpretation while replacing the source-of-record evidence with a machine-checkable official webpage fragment.


wind_farm_id: 6665
canonical_id: 0da51837-f158-4d3e-a8f5-adebde7bbd4b
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 1
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Technical design description
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://offshore.tender-platform.pez.economie.fgov.be/Bijlage-9-Beschrijving%20van%20het%20technisch%20ontwerp/Technical%20design%20description-ENG-v.1.pdf

research_summary:
Project-specific tender documents require bidders to provide turbine manufacturer, model and hub height, but no winning bidder has been selected and no project-specific turbine model has been confirmed. No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided, so the field remains Not confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://offshore.tender-platform.pez.economie.fgov.be/Bijlage-9-Beschrijving%20van%20het%20technisch%20ontwerp/Technical%20design%20description-ENG-v.1.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6665
canonical_id: 0da51837-f158-4d3e-a8f5-adebde7bbd4b
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 1
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Technical design description
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://offshore.tender-platform.pez.economie.fgov.be/Bijlage-9-Beschrijving%20van%20het%20technisch%20ontwerp/Technical%20design%20description-ENG-v.1.pdf

research_summary:
No awarded project company means no confirmed OEM. The tender documentation explicitly asks applicants to state manufacturer and model, confirming these are bidder-defined rather than fixed by the authority.


wind_farm_id: 6665
canonical_id: 0da51837-f158-4d3e-a8f5-adebde7bbd4b
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 1
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Technical design description
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The concession document requires bidders to state nominal capacity per turbine, but no selected design is public. No linked EuroWindWakes fallback exists in the project context.


wind_farm_id: 6665
canonical_id: 0da51837-f158-4d3e-a8f5-adebde7bbd4b
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 1
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Technical design description
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No site-specific as-awarded turbine has been identified. The technical note asks bidders to provide blade/swept-area data, confirming the value is not fixed publicly yet.


wind_farm_id: 6665
canonical_id: 0da51837-f158-4d3e-a8f5-adebde7bbd4b
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 1
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Technical design description
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project-specific technical note explicitly requires bidders to submit “Hub height in relation to LAT,” but no awarded bidder/design is public. No linked EuroWindWakes fallback was available, so hub height remains Not confirmed rather than inferred.


wind_farm_id: 6665
canonical_id: 0da51837-f158-4d3e-a8f5-adebde7bbd4b
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 1
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 8814.0
resolved_source_type: emodnet
resolved_source_name: EMODnet Human Activities
resolved_source_detail: EMODnet Jan 2026
citation_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMODnet Human Activities
source_of_record_type: public data portal
source_of_record_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
source_of_record_licence: Free and open public portal
research_source_name: Technical design description
research_source_type: government tender document
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
The tender documentation leaves turbine number to bidder design, provided minimum capacity is met. This differs from the database validation hint of 0 from EMODnet; the web evidence suggests 0 simply reflects a pre-award concept stage rather than an intended permanent turbine count of zero.


wind_farm_id: 6665
canonical_id: 0da51837-f158-4d3e-a8f5-adebde7bbd4b
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 1
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Technical design description
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific foundation type is not fixed publicly. The technical note shows bidders may propose monopile, jacket or gravity-based foundation and must characterize the chosen option. Because no bidder is selected, no single site-specific foundation type is confirmed for Lot 1.


wind_farm_id: 6665
canonical_id: 0da51837-f158-4d3e-a8f5-adebde7bbd4b
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 1
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 21/11/2024
resolved_value: 21/11/2024
research_value: 21/11/2024
resolved_fact_id: 36437.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
citation_url: https://www.eib.org/en/projects/all/20240726
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: European Investment Bank project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.eib.org/en/projects/all/20240726
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
EIB states the competent authority issued environmental consent on 21 November 2024 for lot 1. The tender launch followed on 25/11/2024, consistent with consent preceding tender launch.


wind_farm_id: 6665
canonical_id: 0da51837-f158-4d3e-a8f5-adebde7bbd4b
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 1
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: FPS Economy offshore tenders
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No private concessionaire has been awarded, so no project-level FID has been identified. The project remains pre-award / pre-construction.


wind_farm_id: 6665
canonical_id: 0da51837-f158-4d3e-a8f5-adebde7bbd4b
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 1
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: FPS Economy offshore tenders
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No awarded project schedule is public after the 2025 tender cancellation; full commissioning is therefore not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6666
canonical_id: 82ca5fb2-7b7e-462c-b031-86ffb3dd5a09
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 2.1
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Princess Elisabeth II (PE II); alternative context: Parcel 2 of the Princess Elisabeth Zone
research_value: Princess Elisabeth II (PE II); alternative context: Parcel 2 of the Princess Elisabeth Zone
research_status: available
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://economie.fgov.be/en/themes/energy/sources-and-carriers-energy/offshore/tenders/identification-parcels

research_summary:
FPS Economy’s parcel page identifies Parcel 2 = Princess Elisabeth II (PE II). The 23/09/2022 Belgian government announcement confirms the Princess Elisabeth Zone was divided into three parcels with capacities of 700 MW, 1225-1400 MW, and 1225-1400 MW; no official separate “Lot 2.1” label was found in accessible public sources, so PE II is the closest resolved official phase/name match.

source_of_record_name:
FPS Economy - Identification of the parcels for the construction of wind farms in the Belgian North Sea

source_of_record_url:
https://economie.fgov.be/en/themes/energy/sources-and-carriers-energy/offshore/tenders/identification-parcels


wind_farm_id: 6666
canonical_id: 82ca5fb2-7b7e-462c-b031-86ffb3dd5a09
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 2.1
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 36438.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: FPS Economy - Organisation of offshore tenders
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Not yet awarded; Current owner(s): Belgian State / domain concession not yet awarded; Equity partners and ownership percentages: Not confirmed; Operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: Not yet awarded; Current owner(s): Belgian State / domain concession not yet awarded; Equity partners and ownership percentages: Not confirmed; Operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
Freshest official source date relied on: 21/04/2026. FPS Economy states that no date has yet been announced for the publication of the tender for Lot 2, so no project-specific winning bidder/developer, operator, or equity structure is yet publicly confirmed. The concession will be granted via competitive tender under the offshore tender framework, so the asset remains a state-planned parcel rather than an awarded private project.


wind_farm_id: 6666
canonical_id: 82ca5fb2-7b7e-462c-b031-86ffb3dd5a09
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 2.1
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://news.belgium.be/fr/energie-offshore-trace-des-parcelles-de-la-zone-princesse-elisabeth
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: News.belgium.be - Energie offshore : tracé des parcelles de la zone Princesse Elisabeth
source_of_record_url: https://news.belgium.be/fr/energie-offshore-trace-des-parcelles-de-la-zone-princesse-elisabeth
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
No private ownership history confirmed; parcel defined by Belgian federal government and awaiting tender award

research_value:
No private ownership history confirmed; parcel defined by Belgian federal government and awaiting tender award

research_summary:
Freshest official source date relied on: 21/04/2026 for tender status and 17/04/2025 for parcel/permit framework. The Belgian government approved the PEZ parcelling on 23/09/2022 and later launched the tender framework, but only Lot 1 proceeded to tender activity; PE II has not yet been awarded, so there is no confirmed ownership transfer history for this parcel.


wind_farm_id: 6666
canonical_id: 82ca5fb2-7b7e-462c-b031-86ffb3dd5a09
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 2.1
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Development Zone / lease area
resolved_value: Development Zone / lease area
research_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
resolved_fact_id: 36439.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: FPS Economy - Organisation of offshore tenders
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
This is the closest Boundary Layer label. The seabed parcel is officially defined and the legal/tender framework exists, but no Lot 2 tender date has been announced yet and no project-specific concessionaire has been selected. It is therefore more advanced than a pure concept, but still pre-award and pre-project-specific planning application.


wind_farm_id: 6666
canonical_id: 82ca5fb2-7b7e-462c-b031-86ffb3dd5a09
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 2.1
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1225-1400 MW planned
resolved_value: 1225-1400 MW planned
research_value: 1225-1400 MW planned
resolved_fact_id: 36440.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://economie.fgov.be/en/themes/energy/sources-and-carriers-energy/offshore/tenders/identification-parcels

research_summary:
Both the official parcel page and the 23/09/2022 Belgian government communication assign Parcel 2 / Princess Elisabeth II a planned capacity of 1225-1400 MW. This differs from the fallback database context of 700 MW, which appears to relate to PE I / Parcel 1, not PE II.

source_of_record_name:
FPS Economy - Identification of the parcels for the construction of wind farms in the Belgian North Sea


wind_farm_id: 6666
canonical_id: 82ca5fb2-7b7e-462c-b031-86ffb3dd5a09
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 2.1
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: FPS Economy - Organisation of offshore tenders
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible official source located for a project-specific MEC value for PE II. Available official sources discuss parcel capacity and grid/tender framework, but do not give a distinct MEC figure for this parcel.


wind_farm_id: 6666
canonical_id: 82ca5fb2-7b7e-462c-b031-86ffb3dd5a09
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 2.1
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: FPS Economy - Organisation of offshore tenders
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine row was provided in the prompt, and no project-specific web source was found confirming a turbine model for PE II. The parcel is not yet awarded, so turbine selection remains unconfirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6666
canonical_id: 82ca5fb2-7b7e-462c-b031-86ffb3dd5a09
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 2.1
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: FPS Economy - Organisation of offshore tenders
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific OEM has been confirmed in accessible official or supplier sources for PE II, and the parcel has not yet been tender-awarded.


wind_farm_id: 6666
canonical_id: 82ca5fb2-7b7e-462c-b031-86ffb3dd5a09
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 2.1
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Summary of tender principles for the Princess Elisabeth Zone
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://economie.fgov.be/sites/default/files/Files/Energy/Tender-principles-Princess-Elisabeth-Zone.pdf

research_summary:
No project-specific turbine rating is confirmed for PE II in accessible sources. The parcel remains pre-award, so turbine selection and unit rating are not yet fixed publicly.

source_of_record_url:
https://economie.fgov.be/sites/default/files/Files/Energy/Tender-principles-Princess-Elisabeth-Zone.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6666
canonical_id: 82ca5fb2-7b7e-462c-b031-86ffb3dd5a09
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 2.1
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: FPS Economy - Organisation of offshore tenders
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific rotor diameter was found, and none should be inferred before a project-specific turbine is confirmed for PE II.


wind_farm_id: 6666
canonical_id: 82ca5fb2-7b7e-462c-b031-86ffb3dd5a09
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 2.1
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: FPS Economy - Organisation of offshore tenders
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific hub height was found, and none should be inferred from a generic turbine platform because PE II has no confirmed turbine selection yet.


wind_farm_id: 6666
canonical_id: 82ca5fb2-7b7e-462c-b031-86ffb3dd5a09
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 2.1
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 8815.0
resolved_source_type: emodnet
resolved_source_name: EMODnet Human Activities
resolved_source_detail: EMODnet Jan 2026
citation_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMODnet Human Activities
source_of_record_type: public data portal
source_of_record_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
source_of_record_licence: Free and open public portal
research_source_name: Summary of tender principles for the Princess Elisabeth Zone
research_source_type: government PDF
research_source_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
No web-sourced turbine count was found for PE II. This does not align with the database validation signal of 0 turbines, but that 0 appears to be a placeholder for an unawarded concept parcel rather than a confirmed design. Since no awarded project design exists, Not confirmed is more accurate than carrying forward 0 as a true project turbine count.

research_source_url:
https://economie.fgov.be/sites/default/files/Files/Energy/Tender-principles-Princess-Elisabeth-Zone.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6666
canonical_id: 82ca5fb2-7b7e-462c-b031-86ffb3dd5a09
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 2.1
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://economie.fgov.be/en/themes/energy/sources-and-carriers-energy/offshore/tenders/preliminary-studies-carried

research_summary:
Government site studies mention that geotechnical work is being undertaken to inform design and installation requirements, including foundations, but no project-specific foundation type has yet been confirmed for PE II.

source_of_record_name:
FPS Economy - Preliminary studies carried out by the Belgian government within the framework of the offshore tender

source_of_record_url:
https://economie.fgov.be/en/themes/energy/sources-and-carriers-energy/offshore/tenders/preliminary-studies-carried


wind_farm_id: 6666
canonical_id: 82ca5fb2-7b7e-462c-b031-86ffb3dd5a09
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 2.1
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific environmental consent date for PE II was found. Official sources note that an EIA and environmental permit will be required, but do not show an issued consent for Parcel 2.

source_of_record_name:
FPS Economy - Identification of the parcels for the construction of wind farms in the Belgian North Sea


wind_farm_id: 6666
canonical_id: 82ca5fb2-7b7e-462c-b031-86ffb3dd5a09
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 2.1
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Summary of tender principles for the Princess Elisabeth Zone
source_of_record_licence: public document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No full commissioning date for PE II was found. The 2023 tender-principles paper gives only generic timing assumptions for future awarded projects, not a confirmed PE II commissioning date.


wind_farm_id: 6667
canonical_id: 31924c6b-1b3e-44f2-8ec1-0e33436c17eb
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 2.2
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Princess Elisabeth II (PE II); database label assessed: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 2.2
research_value: Princess Elisabeth II (PE II); database label assessed: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 2.2
research_status: available
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
FPS Economy’s parcel-identification page lists the PEZ as three parcels only: Princess Elisabeth I, II, III. No authoritative public source found using “Lot 2.2”; therefore the closest official match is Princess Elisabeth II (PE II). Alternative area naming in secondary context links PE II with Noordhinder South.


wind_farm_id: 6667
canonical_id: 31924c6b-1b3e-44f2-8ec1-0e33436c17eb
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 2.2
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 36441.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: FPS Economy - Organisation of Offshore Tenders
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Not confirmed; current owner(s): Belgian State tender not yet awarded; operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: Not confirmed; current owner(s): Belgian State tender not yet awarded; operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
Freshest official source dated 21/04/2026 says “No date has been announced yet for the publication of the tender for Lot 2”, so no project company, developer awardee, owners, equity split, or operator can yet be confirmed for PE II. FPS Economy also states the winning bidder receives the permissions and permits, implying ownership/developer identity will only become knowable after award.


wind_farm_id: 6667
canonical_id: 31924c6b-1b3e-44f2-8ec1-0e33436c17eb
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 2.2
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: FPS Economy - Organisation of Offshore Tenders
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Freshest official source dated 21/04/2026 still shows no tender publication date for PE II, so there is no confirmed awarded sponsor or ownership history yet. Earlier framework sources discuss future tenders only.


wind_farm_id: 6667
canonical_id: 31924c6b-1b3e-44f2-8ec1-0e33436c17eb
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 2.2
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Development Zone / lease area
resolved_value: Development Zone / lease area
research_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
resolved_fact_id: 36442.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: FPS Economy - Organisation of Offshore Tenders
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
PE II is an officially identified parcel inside the PEZ, but FPS Economy’s freshest page says no date has been announced yet for the tender publication for Lot 2. This is beyond a generic concept because the parcel exists within the state’s seabed parcelling and tender framework, but there is no project-specific awarded developer or application yet; therefore Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning is the closest Boundary Layer label.


wind_farm_id: 6667
canonical_id: 31924c6b-1b3e-44f2-8ec1-0e33436c17eb
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 2.2
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1,225–1,400 MW planned
resolved_value: 1,225–1,400 MW planned
research_value: 1,225–1,400 MW planned
resolved_fact_id: 36443.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
FPS Economy’s current parcel page gives PE II = 1225–1400 MW. Elia/market-design material and legal briefings also describe the second-phase large lots at 1225–1400 MW. This differs from the fallback database context of 700 MW, which appears to relate to PE I, not the PE II parcel assessed here.


wind_farm_id: 6667
canonical_id: 31924c6b-1b3e-44f2-8ec1-0e33436c17eb
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 2.2
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific MEC for PE II was found in accessible official sources. Available sources discuss parcel capacity ranges and grid connection concepts, but do not publish a PE II MEC figure.


wind_farm_id: 6667
canonical_id: 31924c6b-1b3e-44f2-8ec1-0e33436c17eb
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 2.2
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: FPS Economy - Organisation of Offshore Tenders
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine row was provided in the prompt, and no project-specific web source confirms a turbine model for PE II. Per instruction, this remains Not confirmed rather than inferred from generic OEM platforms or other wind farms.


wind_farm_id: 6667
canonical_id: 31924c6b-1b3e-44f2-8ec1-0e33436c17eb
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 2.2
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: FPS Economy - Organisation of Offshore Tenders
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No awarded developer and no project-specific turbine supply announcement were found for PE II. No OEM can be confirmed without inference.


wind_farm_id: 6667
canonical_id: 31924c6b-1b3e-44f2-8ec1-0e33436c17eb
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 2.2
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: FPS Economy - Organisation of Offshore Tenders
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific turbine selection has been confirmed for PE II, so individual turbine rating is not confirmable.


wind_farm_id: 6667
canonical_id: 31924c6b-1b3e-44f2-8ec1-0e33436c17eb
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 2.2
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: FPS Economy - Organisation of Offshore Tenders
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific turbine specification for PE II was found; rotor diameter would be inferential and is therefore left unconfirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6667
canonical_id: 31924c6b-1b3e-44f2-8ec1-0e33436c17eb
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 2.2
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: FPS Economy - Organisation of Offshore Tenders
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific hub-height evidence for PE II was found, and no linked EuroWindWakes fallback row was provided. Per rules, do not infer from turbine platform brochures.


wind_farm_id: 6667
canonical_id: 31924c6b-1b3e-44f2-8ec1-0e33436c17eb
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 2.2
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 8816.0
resolved_source_type: emodnet
resolved_source_name: EMODnet Human Activities
resolved_source_detail: EMODnet Jan 2026
citation_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMODnet Human Activities
source_of_record_type: public data portal
source_of_record_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
source_of_record_licence: Free and open public portal
research_source_name: FPS Economy - Organisation of Offshore Tenders
research_source_type: government
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific turbine count is published for PE II in accessible official sources. The non-web validation signal of 0 from EMODnet does not represent a meaningful built/planned turbine count here and is consistent with the project being pre-award / pre-design rather than with a real zero-turbine scheme.


wind_farm_id: 6667
canonical_id: 31924c6b-1b3e-44f2-8ec1-0e33436c17eb
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 2.2
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 36444.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Pile foundations contemplated in preliminary design studies; project-specific foundation type not confirmed

resolved_value:
Pile foundations contemplated in preliminary design studies; project-specific foundation type not confirmed

citation_url:
https://economie.fgov.be/en/themes/energy/sources-and-carriers-energy/offshore/tenders/preliminary-studies-carried

research_summary:
FPS Economy’s preliminary-studies page explicitly mentions a “geotechnical parameters report” for the conceptual design of pile foundations for offshore wind turbines. That supports pile-based conceptual design work for the PEZ, but no accessible source confirms the final PE II foundation type, so the project-specific answer remains cautious.

source_of_record_name:
FPS Economy - Preliminary studies carried out by the Belgian government within the framework of the offshore tender


wind_farm_id: 6667
canonical_id: 31924c6b-1b3e-44f2-8ec1-0e33436c17eb
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 2.2
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: FPS Economy - Organisation of Offshore Tenders
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No PE II project-specific environmental consent date was found. The accessible official consent evidence located relates to PE I, not PE II.


wind_farm_id: 6667
canonical_id: 31924c6b-1b3e-44f2-8ec1-0e33436c17eb
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 2.2
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: FPS Economy - Organisation of Offshore Tenders
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific PE II first-power date has been published in accessible authoritative sources. Older framework material referenced 2030 commissioning ambitions for lots 2/3, but that is not a confirmed PE II first-power milestone and is now stale versus newer official pages saying no tender date has yet been announced.


wind_farm_id: 6667
canonical_id: 31924c6b-1b3e-44f2-8ec1-0e33436c17eb
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 2.2
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: FPS Economy - Organisation of Offshore Tenders
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific PE II commissioning date is currently confirmed. Earlier market/tender framework sources discussed 2030 ambitions, but newer official tender status makes that timetable uncertain.


wind_farm_id: 6668
canonical_id: 29c9232a-4b09-4177-bd5f-274dc1fbce6f
wind_farm_name: Moray West
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Moray West
research_value: Moray West
citation_url: https://www.oceanwinds.com/projects/moray-west/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ocean Winds project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.oceanwinds.com/projects/moray-west/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official project and owner pages identify the asset as Moray West / Moray West Offshore Wind Farm in the outer Moray Firth next to Moray East; this resolves ambiguity in favour of the built standalone project, not Moray East or a later regional development.


wind_farm_id: 6668
canonical_id: 29c9232a-4b09-4177-bd5f-274dc1fbce6f
wind_farm_name: Moray West
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34246.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.moraywest.com/download_file/force/948/219
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Moray West compulsory purchase statement
source_of_record_url: https://www.moraywest.com/download_file/force/948/219
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Ocean Winds; Current owners: Ocean Winds c.95% and UAB Ignitis Renewables 5%; Operator: Ocean Winds

resolved_value:
Developer: Ocean Winds; Current owners: Ocean Winds c.95% and UAB Ignitis Renewables 5%; Operator: Ocean Winds

research_summary:
Freshest dated ownership source relied on is the Moray West compulsory purchase statement published in 2025, which sets out the legal shareholding chain and shows 5% held by UAB Ignitis Renewables, with the remaining 95% ultimately within the Ocean Winds JV structure. The official Moray West sponsors page and Ocean Winds project page corroborate that Ocean Winds is the principal owner and Ignitis holds a small minority stake. Operator is best evidenced by Ocean Winds describing Moray West as part of its portfolio.


wind_farm_id: 6668
canonical_id: 29c9232a-4b09-4177-bd5f-274dc1fbce6f
wind_farm_name: Moray West
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.moraywest.com/news/moray-west-offshore-wind-farm-reaches-financial-close
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Moray West financial close announcement
source_of_record_url: https://www.moraywest.com/news/moray-west-offshore-wind-farm-reaches-financial-close
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Originally developed within the Ocean Winds / EDPR-ENGIE structure; minority stake held by Ignitis by 22/04/2023 financial close; current ownership remains Ocean Winds c.95% / UAB Ignitis Renewables 5%

research_value:
Originally developed within the Ocean Winds / EDPR-ENGIE structure; minority stake held by Ignitis by 22/04/2023 financial close; current ownership remains Ocean Winds c.95% / UAB Ignitis Renewables 5%

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on for current split is the 2025 compulsory purchase statement. For history, Moray West's 22/04/2023 financial close announcement confirms support from Ocean Winds as primary sponsor and Ignitis Group as minority shareholder; newer 2025 ownership-chain evidence reconciles the full partnership to 95% Ocean Winds and 5% Ignitis.


wind_farm_id: 6668
canonical_id: 29c9232a-4b09-4177-bd5f-274dc1fbce6f
wind_farm_name: Moray West
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 34247.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.oceanwinds.com/projects/moray-west/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ocean Winds project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.oceanwinds.com/projects/moray-west/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
A newer owner page states Moray West “reached full power in April 2025” and had successfully finished construction; this is the clearest current status evidence, so the exact Boundary Layer label is Operational.


wind_farm_id: 6668
canonical_id: 29c9232a-4b09-4177-bd5f-274dc1fbce6f
wind_farm_name: Moray West
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 882 MW
resolved_value: 882 MW
research_value: 882 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34248.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.oceanwinds.com/projects/moray-west/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ocean Winds project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.oceanwinds.com/projects/moray-west/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Multiple project, owner, and OEM sources consistently state 882 MW installed capacity. This matches the validation context.


wind_farm_id: 6668
canonical_id: 29c9232a-4b09-4177-bd5f-274dc1fbce6f
wind_farm_name: Moray West
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 850 MW
resolved_value: 850 MW
research_value: 850 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34249.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/00526279.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Moray West CoP and CMS / transmission document
source_of_record_url: https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/00526279.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public sector website terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project consent-variation and construction documents distinguish installed capacity from grid/export limitation and reference around / up to 850 MW for the transmission/export side. This is treated as MEC/export capacity rather than gross installed capacity.


wind_farm_id: 6668
canonical_id: 29c9232a-4b09-4177-bd5f-274dc1fbce6f
wind_farm_name: Moray West
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens Gamesa SG 14-222 DD
resolved_value: Siemens Gamesa SG 14-222 DD
research_value: Siemens Gamesa SG 14-222 DD
resolved_fact_id: 34250.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa order press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/press-releases/062122-siemens-gamesa-press-release-west-moray-offshore.html

research_summary:
Project-specific OEM and project pages explicitly tie the SG 14-222 DD model to Moray West. This also aligns with the linked EuroWindWakes fallback row.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/press-releases/062122-siemens-gamesa-press-release-west-moray-offshore.html


wind_farm_id: 6668
canonical_id: 29c9232a-4b09-4177-bd5f-274dc1fbce6f
wind_farm_name: Moray West
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens Gamesa
resolved_value: Siemens Gamesa
research_value: Siemens Gamesa
resolved_fact_id: 9107.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Siemens Gamesa order press release
research_source_type: OEM press release
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific order and contract announcements identify Siemens Gamesa as turbine supplier/OEM for Moray West.

research_source_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/press-releases/062122-siemens-gamesa-press-release-west-moray-offshore.html


wind_farm_id: 6668
canonical_id: 29c9232a-4b09-4177-bd5f-274dc1fbce6f
wind_farm_name: Moray West
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 14
resolved_value: 14
research_value: 14.7 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9417.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Ocean Winds final turbine announcement
research_source_type: owner/operator press release
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific OEM and project news sources state the SG 14-222 DD units at Moray West are capacity-boosted to 14.7 MW. This differs from the base 14 MW platform name but is explicit for this project.

research_source_url:
https://www.oceanwinds.com/news/uncategorized/ocean-winds-celebrates-final-wind-turbine-installed-on-moray-west/


wind_farm_id: 6668
canonical_id: 29c9232a-4b09-4177-bd5f-274dc1fbce6f
wind_farm_name: Moray West
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 222
resolved_value: 222
research_value: 222 m
resolved_fact_id: 9572.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources identify Moray West as using the SG 14-222 DD. Because project-specific pages confirm the exact turbine variant, and the linked EuroWindWakes project-turbine row explicitly gives rotor diameter 222 m for Moray West, 222 m is used. Project-specific web evidence for the numeric diameter remained indirect, so the EuroWindWakes value is used as the required fallback.


wind_farm_id: 6668
canonical_id: 29c9232a-4b09-4177-bd5f-274dc1fbce6f
wind_farm_name: Moray West
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 146
resolved_value: 146
research_value: 146 m
resolved_fact_id: 9727.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific accessible web sources reviewed did not clearly state Moray West's as-built hub height. Per the required fallback rule, the linked EuroWindWakes project-turbine metadata value of 146 m is used explicitly as dataset fallback rather than inferring from a generic turbine page.


wind_farm_id: 6668
canonical_id: 29c9232a-4b09-4177-bd5f-274dc1fbce6f
wind_farm_name: Moray West
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 60
resolved_value: 60
research_value: 60
resolved_fact_id: 47112.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 60 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Moray West project site
research_source_type: official project webpage
research_source_url: https://www.moraywest.com/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
The blocked row is repaired using the official Moray West project website, which explicitly states that the wind farm houses 60 turbines. This is a clearer source-of-record fit for turbine count than the prior owner page evidence.


wind_farm_id: 6668
canonical_id: 29c9232a-4b09-4177-bd5f-274dc1fbce6f
wind_farm_name: Moray West
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Steel monopile foundations
resolved_value: Steel monopile foundations
research_value: Steel monopile foundations
resolved_fact_id: 34256.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Development Specification and Layout Plan
source_of_record_licence: public sector website terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/moray_west_-_development_specification_and_layout_plan_-_final_redacted.pdf

research_summary:
Project construction and layout-plan documents explicitly state that all 60 WTGs use steel monopile foundations; Boskalis also described the turbines and substations as fixed on monopile foundations.

source_of_record_url:
https://marine.gov.scot/sites/default/files/moray_west_-_development_specification_and_layout_plan_-_final_redacted.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6668
canonical_id: 29c9232a-4b09-4177-bd5f-274dc1fbce6f
wind_farm_name: Moray West
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/06/2019
resolved_value: 01/06/2019
research_value: 01/06/2019
resolved_fact_id: 34257.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.moraywest.com/download_file/force/951/219
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Moray West consent variation report
source_of_record_url: https://www.moraywest.com/download_file/force/951/219
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The clearest accessible evidence states Scottish Ministers granted consent in June 2019; day-level evidence was not clearly available in accessible pages reviewed, so this is normalized to 01/06/2019.


wind_farm_id: 6668
canonical_id: 29c9232a-4b09-4177-bd5f-274dc1fbce6f
wind_farm_name: Moray West
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 22/04/2023
resolved_value: 22/04/2023
research_value: 22/04/2023
resolved_fact_id: 34258.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.moraywest.com/news/moray-west-offshore-wind-farm-reaches-financial-close
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Moray West financial close announcement
source_of_record_url: https://www.moraywest.com/news/moray-west-offshore-wind-farm-reaches-financial-close
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project's financial close announcement on 22/04/2023 is the clearest authoritative milestone corresponding to FID / investable go-ahead before full construction.


wind_farm_id: 6668
canonical_id: 29c9232a-4b09-4177-bd5f-274dc1fbce6f
wind_farm_name: Moray West
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 03/07/2024
resolved_value: 03/07/2024
research_value: 03/07/2024
resolved_fact_id: 34259.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.oceanwinds.com/news/uncategorized/ocean-winds-celebrates-first-power-from-moray-west/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ocean Winds first power announcement
source_of_record_url: https://www.oceanwinds.com/news/uncategorized/ocean-winds-celebrates-first-power-from-moray-west/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Ocean Winds announced first power on 03/07/2024, with export to the National Electricity Transmission System from the first series of turbines.


wind_farm_id: 6668
canonical_id: 29c9232a-4b09-4177-bd5f-274dc1fbce6f
wind_farm_name: Moray West
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2025-04-01
resolved_value: 2025-04-01
research_value: 01/04/2025
resolved_fact_id: 9882.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Ocean Winds project page
research_source_type: owner/operator webpage
research_source_url: https://www.oceanwinds.com/projects/moray-west/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
The current Ocean Winds project page states Moray West “reached full power in April 2025”. As only month/year is visible there, the date is normalized to 01/04/2025. This also aligns with the linked EuroWindWakes commissioning date fallback of April 2025.


wind_farm_id: 6669
canonical_id: a467cca0-9fa3-419b-b624-6cbc765127b6
wind_farm_name: Walney 2
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Walney 2 Offshore Wind Farm
research_value: Walney 2 Offshore Wind Farm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ofgem Walney 2 transmission cost assessment
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/docs/2012/09/cost-assessment-report-for-the-walney-2-transmission-assets_0.pdf

research_summary:
Phase-specific sources identify Walney 2 as the second phase of Walney, with 51 turbines and 183.6 MW. Historic grouping under “Walney 1 and 2” can cause ambiguity with the later Walney Extension, so this profile isolates the phase commissioned in 2012.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/docs/2012/09/cost-assessment-report-for-the-walney-2-transmission-assets_0.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6669
canonical_id: a467cca0-9fa3-419b-b624-6cbc765127b6
wind_farm_name: Walney 2
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34261.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.greencoat-ukwind.com/news-and-media/news-hub/sep-01-walney/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Greencoat UK Wind acquisition announcement
source_of_record_url: https://www.greencoat-ukwind.com/news-and-media/news-hub/sep-01-walney/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Walney (UK) Offshore Windfarms Ltd; Current owners: Ørsted 50.1%, Schroders Greencoat/Greencoat UK Wind 25.1%, PGGM 24.8%; Operator: Ørsted

resolved_value:
Developer: Walney (UK) Offshore Windfarms Ltd; Current owners: Ørsted 50.1%, Schroders Greencoat/Greencoat UK Wind 25.1%, PGGM 24.8%; Operator: Ørsted

research_summary:
Ofgem’s project documentation records the original JV as DONG/SSE/OPW. Ownership later changed when SSE agreed to sell its 25.1% stake to Greencoat UK Wind on 01/09/2020; Greencoat’s dated announcement states Ørsted remained 50.1%, PGGM 24.8%, and that Ørsted operates and manages the project. Freshest dated ownership evidence relied on: Greencoat announcement dated 01/09/2020; supporting current portfolio evidence comes from Greencoat’s Q4 2025 factsheet showing Walney still in portfolio.


wind_farm_id: 6669
canonical_id: a467cca0-9fa3-419b-b624-6cbc765127b6
wind_farm_name: Walney 2
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ofgem EY Walney 2 forensic report
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Original JV: DONG Wind (UK) 50.1%, SSE 25.1%, OPW/PGGM-Ampère 24.8%; from 01/09/2020 SSE agreed sale of 25.1% to Greencoat UK Wind; current split reported as Ørsted 50.1%, Greencoat 25.1%, PGGM 24.8%

research_value:
Original JV: DONG Wind (UK) 50.1%, SSE 25.1%, OPW/PGGM-Ampère 24.8%; from 01/09/2020 SSE agreed sale of 25.1% to Greencoat UK Wind; current split reported as Ørsted 50.1%, Greencoat 25.1%, PGGM 24.8%

citation_url:
https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/docs/2012/09/appendix-7-walney-2-ey-ex-post-forensic-report.pdf

research_summary:
Ofgem and EY documents for Walney 2 record the original construction-period ownership. SSE and Greencoat both published the 01/09/2020 transaction. PGGM separately confirmed its interest had increased to 24.8% in 2019. Freshest dated source relied on for current position: Greencoat Q4 2025 factsheet plus the dated 01/09/2020 Greencoat/SSE transaction pages for the share transfer.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/docs/2012/09/appendix-7-walney-2-ey-ex-post-forensic-report.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6669
canonical_id: a467cca0-9fa3-419b-b624-6cbc765127b6
wind_farm_name: Walney 2
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 34262.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: BEIS review of consents table
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5f4760a8e90e07299030ce93/spa-roc-for-energy-developments-in-england-and-wales-draft-for-consultation.pdf

research_summary:
Walney 2 is clearly an operating project: government review tables list it as “Active/In Operation,” and Greencoat’s 2020 announcement says Walney 2 had been operational since June 2012. This maps directly to the Boundary Layer status Operational.

source_of_record_url:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5f4760a8e90e07299030ce93/spa-roc-for-energy-developments-in-england-and-wales-draft-for-consultation.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6669
canonical_id: a467cca0-9fa3-419b-b624-6cbc765127b6
wind_farm_name: Walney 2
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 183.6 MW
resolved_value: 183.6 MW
research_value: 183.6 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34263.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Planning Inspectorate wake assessment
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010121/EN010121-000902-DL3%20Updated%20Wake%20Assessment%20for%20the%20%C3%98rsted%20IPs.pdf

research_summary:
Phase-specific evidence consistently gives Walney 2 an installed capacity of 183.6 MW, i.e. 51 × 3.6 MW.

source_of_record_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010121/EN010121-000902-DL3%20Updated%20Wake%20Assessment%20for%20the%20%C3%98rsted%20IPs.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6669
canonical_id: a467cca0-9fa3-419b-b624-6cbc765127b6
wind_farm_name: Walney 2
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 184 MW
resolved_value: 184 MW
research_value: 184 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34264.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.bluetransmission.com/sitemanager/uploads/files/BTW2_Reg_Accts_22-23_audit_230622.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Blue Transmission Walney 2 accounts
source_of_record_url: https://www.bluetransmission.com/sitemanager/uploads/files/BTW2_Reg_Accts_22-23_audit_230622.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
A separate project-specific MEC figure was not found on an openly accessible generation licence or grid register page, but multiple authoritative/near-authoritative sources describe Walney 2 as c.183–184 MW. The chosen value is 184 MW, matching the database validation context and consistent with Ofgem’s OFTO material referring to the 183 MW wind farm.


wind_farm_id: 6669
canonical_id: a467cca0-9fa3-419b-b624-6cbc765127b6
wind_farm_name: Walney 2
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens SWT-3.6-120
resolved_value: Siemens SWT-3.6-120
research_value: Siemens SWT-3.6-120
resolved_fact_id: 34265.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Planning Inspectorate wake assessment
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010121/EN010121-000902-DL3%20Updated%20Wake%20Assessment%20for%20the%20%C3%98rsted%20IPs.pdf

research_summary:
Project-linked web evidence confirms Walney 2 uses the SWT-3.6-120. A recent Planning Inspectorate wake assessment also lists Walney 2 as SWT-3.6-120.


wind_farm_id: 6669
canonical_id: a467cca0-9fa3-419b-b624-6cbc765127b6
wind_farm_name: Walney 2
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens
resolved_value: Siemens
research_value: Siemens
resolved_fact_id: 9108.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web evidence ties Walney 2 to Siemens/Siemens Gamesa. The older project was originally supplied by Siemens; newer planning material labels the OEM as Siemens Gamesa for the same turbine line. I normalise the OEM to Siemens, consistent with the construction-era project.


wind_farm_id: 6669
canonical_id: a467cca0-9fa3-419b-b624-6cbc765127b6
wind_farm_name: Walney 2
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 3.6
resolved_value: 3.6
research_value: 3.6 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9418.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Planning Inspectorate wake assessment
research_source_type: planning document
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Recent planning evidence lists Walney 2 turbines at 3.6 MW; this also reconciles exactly with 51 turbines giving 183.6 MW total.


wind_farm_id: 6669
canonical_id: a467cca0-9fa3-419b-b624-6cbc765127b6
wind_farm_name: Walney 2
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 120
resolved_value: 120
research_value: 120 m
resolved_fact_id: 9573.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
One recent Planning Inspectorate source incorrectly shows “Diameter 107 m” in a Walney 2 table, but another recent Planning Inspectorate document and longstanding phase-specific reporting identify Walney 2 as SWT-3.6-120. Because the model designation itself is project-tied here and the linked EuroWindWakes fallback also gives 120 m, 120 m is the most likely correct as-built rotor diameter.


wind_farm_id: 6669
canonical_id: a467cca0-9fa3-419b-b624-6cbc765127b6
wind_farm_name: Walney 2
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 80
resolved_value: 80
research_value: 80 m
resolved_fact_id: 9728.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources were conflicting: recent Planning Inspectorate material lists about 84.9 mMSL, but this may reflect mean sea level measurement conventions rather than nominal hub height. Per the required fallback rule, the linked EuroWindWakes project turbine metadata was used for the chosen hub height value: 80 m.


wind_farm_id: 6669
canonical_id: a467cca0-9fa3-419b-b624-6cbc765127b6
wind_farm_name: Walney 2
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 51
resolved_value: 51
research_value: 51
resolved_fact_id: 47113.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 51 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Planning Inspectorate wake assessment
research_source_type: planning document
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Phase-specific web sources consistently show 51 turbines. This aligns with all non-web validation signals provided in the task context: linked EuroWindWakes count 51 and EMODnet hint 51.


wind_farm_id: 6669
canonical_id: a467cca0-9fa3-419b-b624-6cbc765127b6
wind_farm_name: Walney 2
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile
resolved_value: Monopile
research_value: Monopile
resolved_fact_id: 34271.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.offshore-energy.biz/svanen-completes-monopile-installation-for-walney-2-uk/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Offshore Energy Walney 2 monopile installation announcement
source_of_record_url: https://www.offshore-energy.biz/svanen-completes-monopile-installation-for-walney-2-uk/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific installation reporting states the first and last of the 51 monopiles for Walney 2 were installed in 2011.


wind_farm_id: 6669
canonical_id: a467cca0-9fa3-419b-b624-6cbc765127b6
wind_farm_name: Walney 2
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 07/11/2007
resolved_value: 07/11/2007
research_value: 07/11/2007
resolved_fact_id: 34272.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: BEIS review of consents table
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5f4760a8e90e07299030ce93/spa-roc-for-energy-developments-in-england-and-wales-draft-for-consultation.pdf

research_summary:
A UK government review table lists Walney 2 with Electricity Act (S36) consent dated 07/11/2007. This is the clearest accessible date found.


wind_farm_id: 6669
canonical_id: a467cca0-9fa3-419b-b624-6cbc765127b6
wind_farm_name: Walney 2
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ofgem EY Walney 2 forensic report
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/docs/2012/09/appendix-7-walney-2-ey-ex-post-forensic-report.pdf

research_summary:
I did not find an openly accessible phase-specific official page giving a clear Walney 2 FID date. Construction-period and consent sources are available, but they do not explicitly label an FID milestone for Walney 2.


wind_farm_id: 6669
canonical_id: a467cca0-9fa3-419b-b624-6cbc765127b6
wind_farm_name: Walney 2
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/11/2011
resolved_value: 01/11/2011
research_value: 01/11/2011
resolved_fact_id: 34273.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.offshorewind.biz/2011/11/01/walney-2-offshore-wind-farm-starts-spinning-uk/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: OffshoreWIND.biz Walney 2 first power report
source_of_record_url: https://www.offshorewind.biz/2011/11/01/walney-2-offshore-wind-farm-starts-spinning-uk/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Contemporary project reporting states Walney 2 started delivering electricity to the UK grid on 01/11/2011. EY’s forensic report also says generation commenced in November 2011.


wind_farm_id: 6669
canonical_id: a467cca0-9fa3-419b-b624-6cbc765127b6
wind_farm_name: Walney 2
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2012-06-01
resolved_value: 2012-06-01
research_value: 06/2012
resolved_fact_id: 9883.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Greencoat UK Wind acquisition announcement
research_source_type: owner announcement
research_source_url: https://www.greencoat-ukwind.com/news-and-media/news-hub/sep-01-walney/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
A source-of-record style public owner page states Walney’s two phases “have been operational since July 2011 and June 2012.” That provides a machine-checkable month-year for phase 2 operations, while the earlier government table citation could not be re-verified for the exact 06/04/2012 fragment.


wind_farm_id: 6670
canonical_id: 608d8ec3-2a30-4f4d-aaaf-7b93bd161445
wind_farm_name: Walney 1
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Walney 1 Offshore Wind Farm
research_value: Walney 1 Offshore Wind Farm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SSE archived Walney first phase operational announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110814112309/http://www.sse.com/Pressreleases/2011/Walney1stPhaseOperational/

research_summary:
Project-specific references distinguish Walney 1 from Walney 2 as the first phase of the Walney offshore wind farm. Ofgem lists Walney 1 separately, and SSE’s 2011 operational announcement confirms phase 1 as a 51-turbine project.

source_of_record_url:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110814112309/http://www.sse.com/Pressreleases/2011/Walney1stPhaseOperational/


wind_farm_id: 6670
canonical_id: 608d8ec3-2a30-4f4d-aaaf-7b93bd161445
wind_farm_name: Walney 1
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34304.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.greencoat-ukwind.com/news-and-media/news-hub/sep-01-walney/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Greencoat UK Wind announces acquisition of Walney wind farm
source_of_record_url: https://www.greencoat-ukwind.com/news-and-media/news-hub/sep-01-walney/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developed by DONG Energy, SSE and OPW; current owners for Walney 1 are Ørsted 50.1%, Greencoat UK Wind 25.1%, PGGM 24.8%; operator not confirmed for Walney 1 phase separately

resolved_value:
Developed by DONG Energy, SSE and OPW; current owners for Walney 1 are Ørsted 50.1%, Greencoat UK Wind 25.1%, PGGM 24.8%; operator not confirmed for Walney 1 phase separately

research_summary:
Freshest dated ownership evidence available in the searched official sources is Greencoat’s 01/09/2020 announcement stating it acquired SSE’s 25.1% interest and that Ørsted held 50.1% while PGGM held 24.8%. PGGM’s 17/07/2019 press release corroborates its 24.8% stake. Ofgem confirms original developers as DONG, SSE and OPW. A Walney-wide 2020 owner source says the wind farm is “operated and managed by Orsted”, but this is not phase-specific for Walney 1 alone, so operator is treated cautiously.


wind_farm_id: 6670
canonical_id: 608d8ec3-2a30-4f4d-aaaf-7b93bd161445
wind_farm_name: Walney 1
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.greencoat-ukwind.com/news-and-media/news-hub/sep-01-walney/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Greencoat UK Wind announces acquisition of Walney wind farm
source_of_record_url: https://www.greencoat-ukwind.com/news-and-media/news-hub/sep-01-walney/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Initially developed and owned through Walney (UK) Offshore Windfarms Ltd with DONG/Ørsted 50.1%, SSE 25.1%, and OPW/Ampère-PGGM interests making up 24.8%; by 17/07/2019 PGGM had increased to 24.8%; by 01/09/2020 Greencoat UK Wind agreed to acquire SSE’s 25.1%

research_value:
Initially developed and owned through Walney (UK) Offshore Windfarms Ltd with DONG/Ørsted 50.1%, SSE 25.1%, and OPW/Ampère-PGGM interests making up 24.8%; by 17/07/2019 PGGM had increased to 24.8%; by 01/09/2020 Greencoat UK Wind agreed to acquire SSE’s 25.1%

research_summary:
SSE’s 2011 announcement confirms SSE held 25.1% during Walney 1 commissioning. PGGM’s 17/07/2019 release records its increase to 24.8%. Greencoat’s 01/09/2020 announcement records acquisition of SSE’s 25.1% interest, yielding the current split cited above.


wind_farm_id: 6670
canonical_id: 608d8ec3-2a30-4f4d-aaaf-7b93bd161445
wind_farm_name: Walney 1
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 34305.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: UK government SPA review
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence v3.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/988159/spa-roc-energy-developments-england-wales.pdf

research_summary:
Ofgem lists Walney 1 as a licensed OFTO-connected operating asset, and the UK government SPA review lists Walney 1 as “Active/In Operation”. This matches the database validation context.

source_of_record_url:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/988159/spa-roc-energy-developments-england-wales.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6670
canonical_id: 608d8ec3-2a30-4f4d-aaaf-7b93bd161445
wind_farm_name: Walney 1
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 183.6 MW
resolved_value: 183.6 MW
research_value: 183.6 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34306.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SSE archived Walney first phase operational announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110814112309/http://www.sse.com/Pressreleases/2011/Walney1stPhaseOperational/

research_summary:
SSE’s phase-1 operational announcement gives 183.6 MW for Walney 1; Ofgem rounds the installed capacity to 184 MW. The 183.6 MW figure is the more precise phase-specific installed capacity and aligns with 51 × 3.6 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6670
canonical_id: 608d8ec3-2a30-4f4d-aaaf-7b93bd161445
wind_farm_name: Walney 1
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 184 MW
resolved_value: 184 MW
research_value: 184 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34307.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ofgem OFTO Tender Round 1
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/cy/offshore-electricity-transmission-ofto/ofto-tender-rounds/ofto-tender-round-1

research_summary:
A dedicated Walney 1 MEC figure was not clearly published in the accessible official project pages found. Ofgem lists Walney 1 installed capacity as 184 MW, and Walney 1 grid/export references also use 184 MW. This is therefore the closest confirmed export-capacity proxy; no separate lower MEC value was confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/cy/offshore-electricity-transmission-ofto/ofto-tender-rounds/ofto-tender-round-1


wind_farm_id: 6670
canonical_id: 608d8ec3-2a30-4f4d-aaaf-7b93bd161445
wind_farm_name: Walney 1
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens SWT-3.6-107
resolved_value: Siemens SWT-3.6-107
research_value: Siemens SWT-3.6-107
resolved_fact_id: 34308.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web evidence for Walney 1 turbine model is limited in accessible official pages. EuroWindWakes linked turbine metadata explicitly gives SWT-3.6-107 for Walney 1, and DONG’s 2010 annual report table also lists Walney 1 with 107 m rotor and 3.6 MW turbines, supporting the match. Per the prompt rules, the linked EuroWindWakes value is used as required fallback for turbine-specific detail.


wind_farm_id: 6670
canonical_id: 608d8ec3-2a30-4f4d-aaaf-7b93bd161445
wind_farm_name: Walney 1
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens
resolved_value: Siemens
research_value: Siemens
resolved_fact_id: 9109.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific accessible web sourcing for OEM is limited, but EuroWindWakes linked turbine metadata explicitly names Siemens, and DONG’s 2010 annual report identifies Walney 1 as a Siemens-equipped project. EuroWindWakes is used as the required turbine-specific fallback.


wind_farm_id: 6670
canonical_id: 608d8ec3-2a30-4f4d-aaaf-7b93bd161445
wind_farm_name: Walney 1
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 3.6
resolved_value: 3.6
research_value: 3.6 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9419.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
SSE’s 183.6 MW total over 51 turbines implies 3.6 MW each, and EuroWindWakes explicitly records rated power 3.6 MW for Walney 1 linked turbines. Because this is a turbine-specific field, the explicit dataset value is preferred.


wind_farm_id: 6670
canonical_id: 608d8ec3-2a30-4f4d-aaaf-7b93bd161445
wind_farm_name: Walney 1
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 107
resolved_value: 107
research_value: 107 m
resolved_fact_id: 9574.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web evidence remained limited; the linked EuroWindWakes turbine row gives rotor diameter 107 m, and DONG’s 2010 annual report table also lists Walney 1 with 107 m rotor diameter. EuroWindWakes is used as required fallback.


wind_farm_id: 6670
canonical_id: 608d8ec3-2a30-4f4d-aaaf-7b93bd161445
wind_farm_name: Walney 1
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 80
resolved_value: 80
research_value: 80 m
resolved_fact_id: 9729.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
No clear project-specific official webpage found that explicitly states Walney 1 hub height. Per the required fallback rule, the linked EuroWindWakes value of 80 m is used. No stronger project-specific web source found in the search explicitly tied hub height to Walney 1.


wind_farm_id: 6670
canonical_id: 608d8ec3-2a30-4f4d-aaaf-7b93bd161445
wind_farm_name: Walney 1
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 51
resolved_value: 51
research_value: 51
resolved_fact_id: 47114.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 51 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: SSE archived Walney first phase operational announcement
research_source_type: owner/developer announcement
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
SSE’s phase-1 operational announcement states 51 turbines, and the UK government SPA review lists Walney 1 as a 184 MW operational project completed in 2011; this aligns with the non-web validation signals in the prompt, all of which also point to 51 turbines.


wind_farm_id: 6670
canonical_id: 608d8ec3-2a30-4f4d-aaaf-7b93bd161445
wind_farm_name: Walney 1
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile
resolved_value: Monopile
research_value: Monopile
resolved_fact_id: 34314.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.power-technology.com/data-insights/power-plant-profile-walney-uk/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Power Technology Walney project profile
source_of_record_url: https://www.power-technology.com/data-insights/power-plant-profile-walney-uk/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
A project-specific accessible official Walney 1 foundation statement was hard to find. Secondary but accessible technical references consistently identify Walney phase 1 as using monopile foundations, and Walney project engineering references also describe monopile foundation work. One authoritative project-specific source was not readily accessible, so this remains moderately confident rather than fully confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6670
canonical_id: 608d8ec3-2a30-4f4d-aaaf-7b93bd161445
wind_farm_name: Walney 1
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 07/11/2007
resolved_value: 07/11/2007
research_value: 07/11/2007
resolved_fact_id: 34315.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: UK government SPA review
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence v3.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/988159/spa-roc-energy-developments-england-wales.pdf

research_summary:
The UK government SPA review table explicitly lists Walney 1 consent date as 07/11/2007 under Electricity Act section 36. This is the clearest accessible official confirmation found.


wind_farm_id: 6670
canonical_id: 608d8ec3-2a30-4f4d-aaaf-7b93bd161445
wind_farm_name: Walney 1
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DONG Energy Annual Report 2010
source_of_record_licence: public document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://cdn.orsted.com/-/media/www/docs/corp/com/investor/financial-reporting/annual-reports/dong_energy_annual_report_2010_en.pdf?hash=19C44EF3A2F5DEDD2C1860EB7F051FB7B795BEC2&la=en&rev=48b24470ad4246c4bf6bf85eb9a1c2aa

research_summary:
No accessible official source found in the search that explicitly states a project-level final investment decision date for Walney 1. Available sources discuss development and commissioning milestones but do not clearly label an FID date.

source_of_record_url:
https://cdn.orsted.com/-/media/www/docs/corp/com/investor/financial-reporting/annual-reports/dong_energy_annual_report_2010_en.pdf?hash=19C44EF3A2F5DEDD2C1860EB7F051FB7B795BEC2&la=en&rev=48b24470ad4246c4bf6bf85eb9a1c2aa


wind_farm_id: 6670
canonical_id: 608d8ec3-2a30-4f4d-aaaf-7b93bd161445
wind_farm_name: Walney 1
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 14/01/2011
resolved_value: 14/01/2011
research_value: 14/01/2011
resolved_fact_id: 34316.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.offshorewind.biz/2011/01/14/first-power-from-the-walney-1-offshore-windfarm-uk/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: OffshoreWIND first power from Walney 1
source_of_record_url: https://www.offshorewind.biz/2011/01/14/first-power-from-the-walney-1-offshore-windfarm-uk/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
OffshoreWIND reports first power from Walney 1 on 14/01/2011, and SSE/industry reporting around January 2011 confirms the first turbines had begun exporting electricity.


wind_farm_id: 6670
canonical_id: 608d8ec3-2a30-4f4d-aaaf-7b93bd161445
wind_farm_name: Walney 1
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2011-07-01
resolved_value: 2011-07-01
research_value: 30/05/2011
resolved_fact_id: 9884.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: UK government SPA review
research_source_type: government document
research_source_licence: Open Government Licence v3.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
The UK government SPA review lists Walney 1 “Date completed” as 30/05/2011. This conflicts slightly with SSE’s 11/07/2011 operational announcement; the most likely interpretation is that physical/project completion was recorded by government on 30/05/2011, while formal public announcement of operational status followed in July 2011.


wind_farm_id: 6671
canonical_id: 899e27f7-47c4-48d5-a73b-c6034c61fda4
wind_farm_name: West of Duddon Sands
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/west-of-duddon-sands-offshore-windfarm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower Renewables project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/west-of-duddon-sands-offshore-windfarm
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
West of Duddon Sands Offshore Windfarm; alternative / historic references: West of Duddon Sands, WoDS, WODS

research_value:
West of Duddon Sands Offshore Windfarm; alternative / historic references: West of Duddon Sands, WoDS, WODS

research_summary:
Official project and owner pages use West of Duddon Sands Offshore Windfarm / West of Duddon Sands (WoDS). Historic consent-era material also uses WODS.


wind_farm_id: 6671
canonical_id: 899e27f7-47c4-48d5-a73b-c6034c61fda4
wind_farm_name: West of Duddon Sands
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34318.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://cdn.orsted.com/-/media/rights-issue/orsted-as-prospectus.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted prospectus
source_of_record_url: https://cdn.orsted.com/-/media/rights-issue/orsted-as-prospectus.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: ScottishPower Renewables, DONG Energy (now Ørsted), with Eurus Energy in the consent-stage consortium; current owners: ScottishPower Renewables 50.0%, Ørsted 25.5%, funds managed by Schroders Greencoat 24.5%; operator: Ørsted

resolved_value:
Developer: ScottishPower Renewables, DONG Energy (now Ørsted), with Eurus Energy in the consent-stage consortium; current owners: ScottishPower Renewables 50.0%, Ørsted 25.5%, funds managed by Schroders Greencoat 24.5%; operator: Ørsted

research_summary:
Freshest ownership evidence relied on is Ørsted prospectus published 2026 confirming Ørsted retained 25.5% and remains operator after selling 24.5% to Schroders Greencoat funds on 30/04/2025. Iberdrola’s owner page says the project was “built and operated as a 50/50 partnership”, which reflects the pre-2025 position and is useful background, not the latest full ownership split.


wind_farm_id: 6671
canonical_id: 899e27f7-47c4-48d5-a73b-c6034c61fda4
wind_farm_name: West of Duddon Sands
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://cdn.orsted.com/-/media/rights-issue/orsted-as-prospectus.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted prospectus
source_of_record_url: https://cdn.orsted.com/-/media/rights-issue/orsted-as-prospectus.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Originally consented/developed by ScottishPower Renewables, DONG Energy and Eurus Energy; later built/operated as a 50/50 ScottishPower Renewables–DONG/Ørsted partnership; on 30/04/2025 Ørsted sold 24.5% to Schroders Greencoat-managed funds, leaving current split 50.0% / 25.5% / 24.5%

research_value:
Originally consented/developed by ScottishPower Renewables, DONG Energy and Eurus Energy; later built/operated as a 50/50 ScottishPower Renewables–DONG/Ørsted partnership; on 30/04/2025 Ørsted sold 24.5% to Schroders Greencoat-managed funds, leaving current split 50.0% / 25.5% / 24.5%

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on is 2026 Ørsted prospectus for the current post-transaction structure. Historic ownership is evidenced by the 04/09/2008 ScottishPower consent announcement naming ScottishPower Renewables, DONG Energy and Eurus Energy, and later owner pages describing the operational asset as a 50/50 partnership before the 2025 farm-down.


wind_farm_id: 6671
canonical_id: 899e27f7-47c4-48d5-a73b-c6034c61fda4
wind_farm_name: West of Duddon Sands
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 34319.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Iberdrola asset page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.iberdrola.com/about-us/what-we-do/offshore-wind-energy/west-duddon-sands-offshore-wind-farm

research_summary:
Multiple current owner/operator pages describe the project as operating; Iberdrola states it marked its tenth year of operation in 2024, and the official project page says it was officially opened in October 2014. This cleanly maps to Boundary Layer status Operational.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.iberdrola.com/about-us/what-we-do/offshore-wind-energy/west-duddon-sands-offshore-wind-farm


wind_farm_id: 6671
canonical_id: 899e27f7-47c4-48d5-a73b-c6034c61fda4
wind_farm_name: West of Duddon Sands
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 388.8 MW
resolved_value: 388.8 MW
research_value: 388.8 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34320.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/west-of-duddon-sands-offshore-windfarm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower Renewables project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/west-of-duddon-sands-offshore-windfarm
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The blocked 404 source was replaced. The database context value 388.8 MW is still supported by accessible official project pages because ScottishPower states 108 wind turbines and SWP 3.6 megawatts, which yields 388.8 MW. Those same official pages often round the project to 389 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6671
canonical_id: 899e27f7-47c4-48d5-a73b-c6034c61fda4
wind_farm_name: West of Duddon Sands
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 388.8 MW TEC export rights at the OSP; 382 MW maximum turbine output at the OFTO connection point
resolved_value: 388.8 MW TEC export rights at the OSP; 382 MW maximum turbine output at the OFTO connection point
research_value: 388.8 MW TEC export rights at the OSP; 382 MW maximum turbine output at the OFTO connection point
resolved_fact_id: 34321.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/docs/2012/12/wods-pim_0.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ofgem PIM PDF
source_of_record_url: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/docs/2012/12/wods-pim_0.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Harder-to-source field. Ofgem’s PIM gives the clearest accessible distinction: TEC export rights of 388.8 MW at the OSP and 382 MW at the OFTO connection point due to array cable losses. I therefore report MEC as the documented 388.8 MW TEC export rights, while noting the 382 MW exported-at-connection figure.


wind_farm_id: 6671
canonical_id: 899e27f7-47c4-48d5-a73b-c6034c61fda4
wind_farm_name: West of Duddon Sands
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens SWT-3.6-120
resolved_value: Siemens SWT-3.6-120
research_value: Siemens SWT-3.6-120
resolved_fact_id: 34322.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
ScottishPower explicitly confirms Siemens 3.6 MW turbines with 120 metre rotor diameter, which strongly supports the project using the SWT-3.6-120 platform. Because project webpages stop short of spelling out the exact alphanumeric model, the linked EuroWindWakes 2025 project-turbine metadata is used as the required fallback to lock the model string.


wind_farm_id: 6671
canonical_id: 899e27f7-47c4-48d5-a73b-c6034c61fda4
wind_farm_name: West of Duddon Sands
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens
resolved_value: Siemens
research_value: Siemens
resolved_fact_id: 9110.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: ScottishPower Renewables project page
research_source_type: owner / developer webpage
research_source_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/west-of-duddon-sands-offshore-windfarm
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific official pages repeatedly state the turbines were supplied by Siemens / Siemens Wind Power.


wind_farm_id: 6671
canonical_id: 899e27f7-47c4-48d5-a73b-c6034c61fda4
wind_farm_name: West of Duddon Sands
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 3.6
resolved_value: 3.6
research_value: 3.6 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9420.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: ScottishPower Renewables project page
research_source_type: owner / developer webpage
research_source_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/west-of-duddon-sands-offshore-windfarm
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Official project pages state the turbines are 3.6 MW each. This also reconciles exactly with 108 turbines and 388.8 MW installed capacity.


wind_farm_id: 6671
canonical_id: 899e27f7-47c4-48d5-a73b-c6034c61fda4
wind_farm_name: West of Duddon Sands
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 90
resolved_value: 90
research_value: 90 m
resolved_fact_id: 9730.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources located in this search did not clearly state hub height. Per the required rule, the linked EuroWindWakes 2025 project-turbine metadata fallback is therefore used, which gives 90 m for this project.


wind_farm_id: 6671
canonical_id: 899e27f7-47c4-48d5-a73b-c6034c61fda4
wind_farm_name: West of Duddon Sands
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 108
resolved_value: 108
research_value: 108
resolved_fact_id: 47115.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 108 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: ScottishPower Renewables project page
research_source_type: owner / developer webpage
research_source_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/west-of-duddon-sands-offshore-windfarm
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Official project and regulatory pages consistently state 108 turbines. This aligns with the non-web validation signals: database winner candidate 108, EuroWindWakes linked-turbine count 108, and EMODnet hint 108, so there is no count discrepancy to resolve.


wind_farm_id: 6671
canonical_id: 899e27f7-47c4-48d5-a73b-c6034c61fda4
wind_farm_name: West of Duddon Sands
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile / transition piece
resolved_value: Monopile / transition piece
research_value: Monopile / transition piece
resolved_fact_id: 34328.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.sika.com/en/reference-projects/west-duddon-sands-wind-farm.html
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Sika reference page
source_of_record_url: https://www.sika.com/en/reference-projects/west-duddon-sands-wind-farm.html
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Boskalis’ project page explicitly describes installation of 108 foundations and repeatedly refers to installing monopiles; Sika’s project reference states Foundation type: Monopile / Transition Piece.


wind_farm_id: 6671
canonical_id: 899e27f7-47c4-48d5-a73b-c6034c61fda4
wind_farm_name: West of Duddon Sands
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 04/09/2008
resolved_value: 04/09/2008
research_value: 04/09/2008
resolved_fact_id: 34329.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.scottishpower.com/w/planning_permission_for_west_of_duddon_offshore_windfarm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower consent announcement
source_of_record_url: https://www.scottishpower.com/w/planning_permission_for_west_of_duddon_offshore_windfarm
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
ScottishPower’s consent announcement is dated 04/09/2008 and states consent was granted that day. A government review table also lists Date of consent 04/09/2008 for West of Duddon Sands.


wind_farm_id: 6671
canonical_id: 899e27f7-47c4-48d5-a73b-c6034c61fda4
wind_farm_name: West of Duddon Sands
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 27/06/2011
resolved_value: 27/06/2011
research_value: 27/06/2011
resolved_fact_id: 34330.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower construction approval announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.scottishpower.com/w/scottishpower_renewables_and_dong_energy_approve_construction_of_west_of_duddon_sands_offshore_windfarm

research_summary:
ScottishPower’s construction-approval announcement is the clearest accessible project-specific FID-equivalent source, stating ScottishPower Renewables and DONG Energy approve construction of the project. I normalize that investment approval milestone as FID on 27/06/2011.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.scottishpower.com/w/scottishpower_renewables_and_dong_energy_approve_construction_of_west_of_duddon_sands_offshore_windfarm


wind_farm_id: 6671
canonical_id: 899e27f7-47c4-48d5-a73b-c6034c61fda4
wind_farm_name: West of Duddon Sands
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 28/01/2014
resolved_value: 28/01/2014
research_value: 28/01/2014
resolved_fact_id: 34331.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://westofduddonsands.co.uk/news/2017/10/first-power-at-west-of-duddon-sands
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: West of Duddon Sands JV news page
source_of_record_url: https://westofduddonsands.co.uk/news/2017/10/first-power-at-west-of-duddon-sands
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The blocked 404 ScottishPower source was replaced with an accessible official project-owner news page on the West of Duddon Sands site, which states the project generated power for the first time on 28 January 2014.


wind_farm_id: 6671
canonical_id: 899e27f7-47c4-48d5-a73b-c6034c61fda4
wind_farm_name: West of Duddon Sands
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2014-10-01
resolved_value: 2014-10-01
research_value: 30/10/2014
resolved_fact_id: 9885.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: ScottishPower official opening page
research_source_type: official company webpage
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
ScottishPower’s official-opening page says the opening celebrated the completion of construction and was officially opened on 30/10/2014; Iberdrola states the asset was inaugurated in October 2014. I use 30/10/2014 as the best accessible full-commissioning / official completion date.

research_source_url:
https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/w/official-opening-following-full-power-at-west-of-duddon-sands-offshore-windfarm


wind_farm_id: 6672
canonical_id: 5e465a22-73f6-4165-b027-7f38a90e6b8e
wind_farm_name: Barrow
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/04145993
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Companies House – Barrow Offshore Wind Limited
source_of_record_url: https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/04145993
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Barrow Offshore Wind Farm; historic project company name: Barrow Offshore Wind Ltd; original company name: Warwick Offshore Wind Limited

research_value:
Barrow Offshore Wind Farm; historic project company name: Barrow Offshore Wind Ltd; original company name: Warwick Offshore Wind Limited

research_summary:
Project identity is consistent across official owner, Companies House, and regulator sources. Companies House shows the project company was previously named Warwick Offshore Wind Limited before becoming Barrow Offshore Wind Limited.


wind_farm_id: 6672
canonical_id: 5e465a22-73f6-4165-b027-7f38a90e6b8e
wind_farm_name: Barrow
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34333.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/our-business/marine/wind-farm-ownership
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: The Crown Estate wind farm ownership
source_of_record_url: https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/our-business/marine/wind-farm-ownership
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Warwick Energy initially; development rights acquired in 09/2003 by DONG Energy, Centrica and Statkraft; current owner: Ørsted 100%; operator: Ørsted

resolved_value:
Developer: Warwick Energy initially; development rights acquired in 09/2003 by DONG Energy, Centrica and Statkraft; current owner: Ørsted 100%; operator: Ørsted

research_summary:
Freshest ownership source used: The Crown Estate page published/updated for ownership as at 31/12/2024 confirms **Barrow \


wind_farm_id: 6672
canonical_id: 5e465a22-73f6-4165-b027-7f38a90e6b8e
wind_farm_name: Barrow
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted acquisition announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
23/01/2001 Warwick Offshore Wind Limited incorporated; 09/2003 rights acquired by DONG Energy, Centrica and Statkraft; Statkraft later exited creating 50:50 DONG/Centrica JV; 18/12/2014 Centrica sold its 50% stake to DONG Energy; current structure: Ørsted 100%

research_value:
23/01/2001 Warwick Offshore Wind Limited incorporated; 09/2003 rights acquired by DONG Energy, Centrica and Statkraft; Statkraft later exited creating 50:50 DONG/Centrica JV; 18/12/2014 Centrica sold its 50% stake to DONG Energy; current structure: Ørsted 100%

citation_url:
https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2014/12/dong-energy-acquires-full-ownership-of-the-barrow-offshore-wind-farm

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on for current ownership is The Crown Estate ownership page as at 31/12/2024. For history, Ørsted’s dated 19/12/2014 announcement says it acquired the remaining 50% ownership interest from Centrica; Ofgem explains the earlier Warwick-to-DONG/Centrica/Statkraft sequence and later 50:50 JV. The current sole-owner position reconciles cleanly to 100%.

source_of_record_url:
https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2014/12/dong-energy-acquires-full-ownership-of-the-barrow-offshore-wind-farm


wind_farm_id: 6672
canonical_id: 5e465a22-73f6-4165-b027-7f38a90e6b8e
wind_farm_name: Barrow
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 34334.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/our-business/marine/wind-farm-ownership
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: The Crown Estate wind farm ownership
source_of_record_url: https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/our-business/marine/wind-farm-ownership
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The Crown Estate ownership table lists Barrow in the UK operational and under construction wind farm ownership page and shows **Barrow \


wind_farm_id: 6672
canonical_id: 5e465a22-73f6-4165-b027-7f38a90e6b8e
wind_farm_name: Barrow
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 90 MW
resolved_value: 90 MW
research_value: 90 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34335.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ofgem Barrow OFTO press release
source_of_record_licence: public sector information / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/press-release/ofgem-e-serve-grants-third-offshore-transmission-owner-licence-link-barrow-wind-farm

research_summary:
Capacity is consistently stated as 90 MW by accessible regulator and owner-contractor sources. Ofgem’s Barrow OFTO press release says 90 MW Barrow offshore wind farm, and the EPCM project sheet states total rated power of 90 MW (30 @ 3 MW).

source_of_record_url:
https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/press-release/ofgem-e-serve-grants-third-offshore-transmission-owner-licence-link-barrow-wind-farm


wind_farm_id: 6672
canonical_id: 5e465a22-73f6-4165-b027-7f38a90e6b8e
wind_farm_name: Barrow
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ofgem cost assessment report for the Barrow transmission assets
source_of_record_licence: public sector information / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/docs/2011/09/barrow-ex-post-cost-assessment-report_0.pdf

research_summary:
Open web sources accessed clearly confirm installed capacity of 90 MW, but did not provide a project-specific explicitly labelled MEC figure. I have therefore kept MEC as Not confirmed rather than equating installed capacity with export/MEC.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/docs/2011/09/barrow-ex-post-cost-assessment-report_0.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6672
canonical_id: 5e465a22-73f6-4165-b027-7f38a90e6b8e
wind_farm_name: Barrow
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas V90-3.0 MW Offshore
resolved_value: Vestas V90-3.0 MW Offshore
research_value: Vestas V90-3.0 MW Offshore
resolved_fact_id: 34336.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web evidence was limited and partly secondary; the linked EuroWindWakes 2025 project-turbine metadata was therefore used as the required fallback, which aligns with accessible web summaries stating 30 V90 turbines.


wind_farm_id: 6672
canonical_id: 5e465a22-73f6-4165-b027-7f38a90e6b8e
wind_farm_name: Barrow
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas
resolved_value: Vestas
research_value: Vestas
resolved_fact_id: 9111.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web evidence was not strong enough on its own for a full technical row set, so the linked EuroWindWakes 2025 turbine metadata was used as fallback; this matches accessible web references to Vestas V90 turbines at Barrow.


wind_farm_id: 6672
canonical_id: 5e465a22-73f6-4165-b027-7f38a90e6b8e
wind_farm_name: Barrow
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 3
resolved_value: 3
research_value: 3 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9421.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
The linked EuroWindWakes 2025 turbine metadata gives 3 MW and this is corroborated by project summaries describing 30 V90 turbines generating 90 MW total.


wind_farm_id: 6672
canonical_id: 5e465a22-73f6-4165-b027-7f38a90e6b8e
wind_farm_name: Barrow
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 90
resolved_value: 90
research_value: 90 m
resolved_fact_id: 9576.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific accessible web evidence remained limited; the linked EuroWindWakes 2025 row was used as required fallback for rotor diameter. This is consistent with V90 references in project-level web material.


wind_farm_id: 6672
canonical_id: 5e465a22-73f6-4165-b027-7f38a90e6b8e
wind_farm_name: Barrow
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 75
resolved_value: 75
research_value: 75 m
resolved_fact_id: 9731.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
No strong project-specific authoritative web source explicitly tied hub height to Barrow in the pages accessed, so the linked EuroWindWakes 2025 turbine metadata was used as the required fallback.


wind_farm_id: 6672
canonical_id: 5e465a22-73f6-4165-b027-7f38a90e6b8e
wind_farm_name: Barrow
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 30
resolved_value: 30
research_value: 30
resolved_fact_id: 47116.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 30 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Ofgem preliminary information memorandum for Barrow offshore wind farm
research_source_type: regulator PDF
research_source_licence: public sector information / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Accessible project-specific sources consistently confirm 30 turbines. Ofgem’s preliminary information memorandum says The Barrow Wind Farm comprises 30 Vestas 3MW wind turbine generators, and the EPCM project sheet says 30 Wind Turbine Generators.

research_source_url:
https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/docs/2009/07/barrow---project-specific-preliminary-information-memorandum-%28pim%29.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6672
canonical_id: 5e465a22-73f6-4165-b027-7f38a90e6b8e
wind_farm_name: Barrow
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile
resolved_value: Monopile
research_value: Monopile
resolved_fact_id: 34342.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://epcm.dk/onewebmedia/Barrow-Offshore-Wind-Farm.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EPCM project sheet – Barrow Offshore Wind Farm
source_of_record_url: https://epcm.dk/onewebmedia/Barrow-Offshore-Wind-Farm.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Accessible project-specific evidence is available from an engineering project sheet stating WTG Foundation Types: Monopiles; this is also consistent with Ofgem/Tethys contextual material. One authoritative accessible source is acceptable here because stronger corroboration is hard to obtain.


wind_farm_id: 6672
canonical_id: 5e465a22-73f6-4165-b027-7f38a90e6b8e
wind_farm_name: Barrow
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 10/03/2003
resolved_value: 10/03/2003
research_value: 10/03/2003
resolved_fact_id: 34343.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Planning Inspectorate Morecambe applicant response
source_of_record_licence: public sector information / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010121-000895-9.41%20The%20Applicants%20Response%20to%20ExAs%20Written%20Questions%201.pdf

research_summary:
A recent Planning Inspectorate document discussing cumulative effects for Morecambe explicitly cites the Barrow Section 36 consent as granted on 10 March 2003. This aligns with other public references that say consent was given in March 2003.

source_of_record_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010121-000895-9.41%20The%20Applicants%20Response%20to%20ExAs%20Written%20Questions%201.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6672
canonical_id: 5e465a22-73f6-4165-b027-7f38a90e6b8e
wind_farm_name: Barrow
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.eib.org/en/projects/pipelines/all/20020169
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: European Investment Bank project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.eib.org/en/projects/pipelines/all/20020169
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I did not find an openly accessible project-specific source explicitly stating an FID date. Because this is a 2000s project and the available evidence focuses on consent, ownership transfers and commissioning, the FID date remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6672
canonical_id: 5e465a22-73f6-4165-b027-7f38a90e6b8e
wind_farm_name: Barrow
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/07/2006
resolved_value: 01/07/2006
research_value: 01/07/2006
resolved_fact_id: 34344.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://epcm.dk/onewebmedia/Barrow-Offshore-Wind-Farm.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EPCM project sheet – Barrow Offshore Wind Farm
source_of_record_url: https://epcm.dk/onewebmedia/Barrow-Offshore-Wind-Farm.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The best accessible project-specific evidence found states turbine installation/finish construction by July 2006 and multiple official owner pages state commercial operation since 2006. I therefore normalised first power to 01/07/2006 as a month-level proxy and note that this is less certain than the commissioning date.


wind_farm_id: 6672
canonical_id: 5e465a22-73f6-4165-b027-7f38a90e6b8e
wind_farm_name: Barrow
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2006-09-01
resolved_value: 2006-09-01
research_value: 01/09/2006
resolved_fact_id: 9886.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
The linked EuroWindWakes 2025 metadata gives a commissioning date of 01/09/2006 and this fits owner/operator sources saying the project has been in full/commercial operation since 2006. Project-specific open web evidence did not yield a more precise authoritative commissioning day, so dataset fallback was used.


wind_farm_id: 6673
canonical_id: 6435135c-e6b1-4e55-be75-7397fccdb1ed
wind_farm_name: Ormonde
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Ormonde Offshore Wind Farm
research_value: Ormonde Offshore Wind Farm
citation_url: https://www.vattenfall.co.uk/our-projects/ormonde
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall UK project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.vattenfall.co.uk/our-projects/ormonde
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Vattenfall’s current UK project page and power-plant page both identify the asset as Ormonde Offshore Wind Farm / Ormonde in the Irish Sea near Barrow-in-Furness; no separate built extension phase was found.


wind_farm_id: 6673
canonical_id: 6435135c-e6b1-4e55-be75-7397fccdb1ed
wind_farm_name: Ormonde
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34346.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.vattenfall.co.uk/our-projects/ormonde
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall UK project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.vattenfall.co.uk/our-projects/ormonde
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: originally developed by Eclipse Energy, later acquired/developed by Vattenfall; Current owners: Vattenfall 51%, AMF 49%; Operator: Vattenfall

resolved_value:
Developer: originally developed by Eclipse Energy, later acquired/developed by Vattenfall; Current owners: Vattenfall 51%, AMF 49%; Operator: Vattenfall

research_summary:
Vattenfall’s project page states that in 2015 it entered a partnership with AMF and that AMF own a 49% share while Vattenfall continues to operate the wind farm; Vattenfall’s power-plant page states Vattenfall ownership share 51%. RPS says it supported the project “prior to acquisition of the project by Vattenfall,” supporting the development history. Freshest ownership source relied on: Vattenfall UK page as crawled live and the current Vattenfall power-plant page.


wind_farm_id: 6673
canonical_id: 6435135c-e6b1-4e55-be75-7397fccdb1ed
wind_farm_name: Ormonde
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.rpsgroup.com/projects/ormonde-offshore-wind-farm/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RPS project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.rpsgroup.com/projects/ormonde-offshore-wind-farm/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developed by Eclipse Energy; acquired by Vattenfall before construction; 2015 onward ownership split: Vattenfall 51%, AMF 49%

research_value:
Developed by Eclipse Energy; acquired by Vattenfall before construction; 2015 onward ownership split: Vattenfall 51%, AMF 49%

research_summary:
RPS says it had worked on Ormonde since 2004 “prior to acquisition of the project by Vattenfall.” Vattenfall’s project page says “In 2015, Vattenfall entered a partnership with Swedish pension group AMF” and AMF holds 49%. Freshest source date relied on for current structure: current Vattenfall pages; older RPS page is used only for pre-Vattenfall development history.


wind_farm_id: 6673
canonical_id: 6435135c-e6b1-4e55-be75-7397fccdb1ed
wind_farm_name: Ormonde
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 34347.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/ormonde/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall power plant page
source_of_record_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/ormonde/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Vattenfall’s power-plant page lists Status: In Operation and a UK government habitats-review appendix lists Ormonde as Active/In Operation. This maps cleanly to the Boundary Layer label Operational.


wind_farm_id: 6673
canonical_id: 6435135c-e6b1-4e55-be75-7397fccdb1ed
wind_farm_name: Ormonde
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 150 MW
resolved_value: 150 MW
research_value: 150 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34348.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/ormonde/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall power plant page
source_of_record_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/ormonde/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Vattenfall’s power-plant page lists 150 MWe and FoundOcean states the wind farm comprises 30 RePower 5MW wind turbines producing a capacity of 150MW.


wind_farm_id: 6673
canonical_id: 6435135c-e6b1-4e55-be75-7397fccdb1ed
wind_farm_name: Ormonde
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://tinv.com/ofto-projects/ormonde/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Transmission Investment OFTO page
source_of_record_url: https://tinv.com/ofto-projects/ormonde/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Open web sources clearly confirm a 132 kV export cable and 150 MW installed capacity, but no openly accessible authoritative source found during this search stated Ormonde’s MEC in MW/MVA explicitly. To avoid conflating installed capacity with contracted export capacity, MEC is left Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6673
canonical_id: 6435135c-e6b1-4e55-be75-7397fccdb1ed
wind_farm_name: Ormonde
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Senvion 5M (project-specific web sources usually describe it as REpower 5MW / RePower 5M)
resolved_value: Senvion 5M (project-specific web sources usually describe it as REpower 5MW / RePower 5M)
research_value: Senvion 5M (project-specific web sources usually describe it as REpower 5MW / RePower 5M)
resolved_fact_id: 34349.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web pages confirm the project used REpower 5MW turbines, but accessible web pages were inconsistent on exact naming style. Per the required fallback rule, the linked EuroWindWakes project-turbine metadata was used for the precise model label 5M, with Vattenfall and OffshoreWIND.biz used as project-specific corroboration that Ormonde used REpower/Senvion 5 MW machines.


wind_farm_id: 6673
canonical_id: 6435135c-e6b1-4e55-be75-7397fccdb1ed
wind_farm_name: Ormonde
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Senvion
resolved_value: Senvion
research_value: Senvion (formerly REpower)
resolved_fact_id: 9112.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Vattenfall’s power-plant page lists supplier Repower and project-specific reporting also refers to REpower 5MW turbines. Because the linked turbine dataset gives the OEM as Senvion and REpower was the predecessor brand, the chosen value is Senvion (formerly REpower) to reflect current OEM naming without losing project-specific wording.


wind_farm_id: 6673
canonical_id: 6435135c-e6b1-4e55-be75-7397fccdb1ed
wind_farm_name: Ormonde
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 5.08
resolved_value: 5.08
research_value: 5.08 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9422.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources consistently say 5MW turbines, but not the more precise as-built unit rating. Per the required fallback rule, the linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was used for 5.08 MW because project-specific web evidence was less precise.


wind_farm_id: 6673
canonical_id: 6435135c-e6b1-4e55-be75-7397fccdb1ed
wind_farm_name: Ormonde
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 126
resolved_value: 126
research_value: 126 m
resolved_fact_id: 9577.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific reporting on first turbine installation states the turbine had a 126m diameter rotor; the linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata also gives 126 m, so the values align.


wind_farm_id: 6673
canonical_id: 6435135c-e6b1-4e55-be75-7397fccdb1ed
wind_farm_name: Ormonde
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 100
resolved_value: 100
research_value: 100 m
resolved_fact_id: 9732.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
No accessible authoritative project page found during this search explicitly stated Ormonde’s hub height. Per the required fallback rule, the linked EuroWindWakes project-turbine metadata was used for 100 m.


wind_farm_id: 6673
canonical_id: 6435135c-e6b1-4e55-be75-7397fccdb1ed
wind_farm_name: Ormonde
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 30
resolved_value: 30
research_value: 30
resolved_fact_id: 47117.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 30 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Vattenfall power plant page
research_source_type: owner/operator webpage
research_source_url: https://powerplants.vattenfall.com/ormonde/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Vattenfall’s power-plant page lists 30 turbines and FoundOcean says the wind farm comprises 30 RePower 5MW wind turbines. This aligns with the provided non-web validation signals showing 30 linked turbines and the EMODnet turbine-count hint of 30.


wind_farm_id: 6673
canonical_id: 6435135c-e6b1-4e55-be75-7397fccdb1ed
wind_farm_name: Ormonde
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Jacket foundations
resolved_value: Jacket foundations
research_value: Jacket foundations
resolved_fact_id: 34355.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.vattenfall.co.uk/our-projects/ormonde
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall UK project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.vattenfall.co.uk/our-projects/ormonde
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Vattenfall says Ormonde was the first commercial deployment of steel jacket foundations and FoundOcean says the wind farm uses jacket foundations.


wind_farm_id: 6673
canonical_id: 6435135c-e6b1-4e55-be75-7397fccdb1ed
wind_farm_name: Ormonde
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 04/09/2008
resolved_value: 04/09/2008
research_value: 04/09/2008
resolved_fact_id: 34356.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: UK government SPA/HRA review appendix PDF
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence v3.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
A UK government habitats-review appendix lists Ormonde as Electricity Act (S36) with Date of consent 04/09/2008. A later draft review also notes the project was “subsequently modified to have a capacity of 150MW in 2008,” consistent with the 2008 consented form of the built project.


wind_farm_id: 6673
canonical_id: 6435135c-e6b1-4e55-be75-7397fccdb1ed
wind_farm_name: Ormonde
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vattenfall Annual Report 2011
source_of_record_licence: public document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/siteassets/corporate/investors/annual-reports/2011/annual_report_2011.pdf

research_summary:
Publicly accessible sources found in this search confirm development, construction, commissioning and financing context, but no openly accessible authoritative source was found that clearly labels a specific FID date for Ormonde. To avoid back-solving FID from financing milestones, this is left Not confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://group.vattenfall.com/siteassets/corporate/investors/annual-reports/2011/annual_report_2011.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6673
canonical_id: 6435135c-e6b1-4e55-be75-7397fccdb1ed
wind_farm_name: Ormonde
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 18/08/2011
resolved_value: 18/08/2011
research_value: 18/08/2011
resolved_fact_id: 34357.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.offshorewind.biz/2011/08/19/ormonde-offshore-wind-farm-generates-first-electricity-uk/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: OffshoreWIND.biz first electricity report
source_of_record_url: https://www.offshorewind.biz/2011/08/19/ormonde-offshore-wind-farm-generates-first-electricity-uk/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
OffshoreWIND.biz reports that Ormonde exported power to the National Grid for the first time at 7pm on Thursday, 18 August. Vattenfall’s 2011 annual report says the wind farm began supplying electricity to customers in September 2011; the dated first-export report is the more precise first-power source.


wind_farm_id: 6673
canonical_id: 6435135c-e6b1-4e55-be75-7397fccdb1ed
wind_farm_name: Ormonde
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2012-02-01
resolved_value: 2012-02-01
research_value: 22/02/2012
resolved_fact_id: 9887.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: UK government SPA/HRA review appendix PDF
research_source_type: government PDF
research_source_licence: Open Government Licence v3.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
The UK government habitats-review appendix lists Ormonde Date completed 22/02/2012. Vattenfall’s power-plant page says the wind farm was commissioned in early 2012, and OffshoreWIND.biz says commissioning completed in February 2012.


wind_farm_id: 6674
canonical_id: b14e1493-dd12-4f25-9d6d-4185a929c7fd
wind_farm_name: Rhyl Flats
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Rhyl Flats offshore wind farm
research_value: Rhyl Flats offshore wind farm
citation_url: https://uk.rwe.com/locations/rhyl-flats-offshore-wind-farm/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE project page
source_of_record_url: https://uk.rwe.com/locations/rhyl-flats-offshore-wind-farm/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official project name is consistently given as Rhyl Flats offshore wind farm / Rhyl Flats Offshore Wind Farm. Historic development material shows the project was originally advanced by Celtic Offshore Wind Ltd before being built and now operated within the RWE group.


wind_farm_id: 6674
canonical_id: b14e1493-dd12-4f25-9d6d-4185a929c7fd
wind_farm_name: Rhyl Flats
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34359.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE Rhyl Flats Wind Farm Ltd s172 statement 2024
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developed by Celtic Offshore Wind Ltd, later acquired/developed and built by RWE npower renewables / RWE Innogy; current owners: RWE 50.1%, Green Investment Group 24.95%, Greencoat 24.95%; operator: RWE

resolved_value:
Developed by Celtic Offshore Wind Ltd, later acquired/developed and built by RWE npower renewables / RWE Innogy; current owners: RWE 50.1%, Green Investment Group 24.95%, Greencoat 24.95%; operator: RWE

citation_url:
https://www.rwe.com/-/media/RWE/documents/modern-slavery-statements/s-172-statements/2024/rhyl-flats-s-172-2024.pdf

research_summary:
Freshest ownership evidence relied on is the RWE 2024 s172 statement for year ended 31/12/2024, which lists shareholder percentages via company shareholdings, and the current RWE project page, which states RWE operates the asset and gives the same consortium split. Historic development evidence from the EIA shows Celtic Offshore Wind Ltd secured early rights in 2001 before later RWE development/build-out.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.rwe.com/-/media/RWE/documents/modern-slavery-statements/s-172-statements/2024/rhyl-flats-s-172-2024.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6674
canonical_id: b14e1493-dd12-4f25-9d6d-4185a929c7fd
wind_farm_name: Rhyl Flats
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Green Investment Group 2013 announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
RWE acquired the project from Celtic Offshore Wind Ltd in 2002; in 2013 RWE sold two 24.95% stakes, one to the UK Green Investment Bank/Green Investment Group and one to Greencoat, retaining 50.1%

research_value:
RWE acquired the project from Celtic Offshore Wind Ltd in 2002; in 2013 RWE sold two 24.95% stakes, one to the UK Green Investment Bank/Green Investment Group and one to Greencoat, retaining 50.1%

citation_url:
https://www.greeninvestmentgroup.com/en/news/2013/first-direct-equity-investment-in-offshore-wind-announced.html

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on for current structure is the 2024 RWE s172 statement; for the key historic transfer, Green Investment Group’s 22/03/2013 announcement confirms acquisition of a 24.95% stake alongside Greencoat. Current naming now appears as Green Investment Group on RWE’s live project page, while the shareholder company name in the 2024 statement is UK Green Investment Rhyl Flats Ltd.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.greeninvestmentgroup.com/en/news/2013/first-direct-equity-investment-in-offshore-wind-announced.html


wind_farm_id: 6674
canonical_id: b14e1493-dd12-4f25-9d6d-4185a929c7fd
wind_farm_name: Rhyl Flats
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 34360.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://uk.rwe.com/locations/rhyl-flats-offshore-wind-farm/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE project page
source_of_record_url: https://uk.rwe.com/locations/rhyl-flats-offshore-wind-farm/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
RWE’s current project page states the wind farm is operated by RWE and says it began producing power in December 2009; Tethys lists it as fully commissioned in 2009. This aligns with the database validation context.


wind_farm_id: 6674
canonical_id: b14e1493-dd12-4f25-9d6d-4185a929c7fd
wind_farm_name: Rhyl Flats
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 90 MW
resolved_value: 90 MW
research_value: 90 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34361.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/wind-project-sites/rhyl-flats
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Tethys project page
source_of_record_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/wind-project-sites/rhyl-flats
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The blocked row was repaired using an openly accessible project summary page that explicitly states Rhyl Flats has a 90 MW capacity. This avoids relying on the prior failed evidence fragment from the RWE page while keeping the reported value unchanged.


wind_farm_id: 6674
canonical_id: b14e1493-dd12-4f25-9d6d-4185a929c7fd
wind_farm_name: Rhyl Flats
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/wind-project-sites/rhyl-flats
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Tethys project page
source_of_record_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/wind-project-sites/rhyl-flats
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Publicly accessible project-specific sources reviewed clearly confirm installed capacity and a 132 kV connection, but I did not find an authoritative open source explicitly stating a project MEC figure distinct from installed capacity. To avoid conflating gross installed capacity with export capability, this is left Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6674
canonical_id: b14e1493-dd12-4f25-9d6d-4185a929c7fd
wind_farm_name: Rhyl Flats
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: SWT-3.6-107
resolved_value: SWT-3.6-107
research_value: SWT-3.6-107
resolved_fact_id: 34362.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources accessible in this search were limited for the as-built turbine model, so the linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was used as the required fallback. Secondary web sources located are consistent with Siemens SWT-3.6-107.


wind_farm_id: 6674
canonical_id: b14e1493-dd12-4f25-9d6d-4185a929c7fd
wind_farm_name: Rhyl Flats
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens
resolved_value: Siemens
research_value: Siemens
resolved_fact_id: 9113.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web evidence on OEM was not stronger than the linked turbine metadata, so the linked EuroWindWakes row was used as the required fallback; corroborative secondary web sources also identify Siemens.


wind_farm_id: 6674
canonical_id: b14e1493-dd12-4f25-9d6d-4185a929c7fd
wind_farm_name: Rhyl Flats
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 3.6
resolved_value: 3.6
research_value: 3.6 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9423.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sourcing for individual turbine rating was inconclusive/secondary, so the linked EuroWindWakes row was used as the required fallback; this is consistent with 25 turbines delivering 90 MW total.


wind_farm_id: 6674
canonical_id: b14e1493-dd12-4f25-9d6d-4185a929c7fd
wind_farm_name: Rhyl Flats
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 107
resolved_value: 107
research_value: 107 m
resolved_fact_id: 9578.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
No stronger project-specific official page explicitly tying rotor diameter to Rhyl Flats was found in the accessible web material, so the linked EuroWindWakes value was used as the required fallback; corroborative secondary project listings agree on 107 m.


wind_farm_id: 6674
canonical_id: b14e1493-dd12-4f25-9d6d-4185a929c7fd
wind_farm_name: Rhyl Flats
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 80
resolved_value: 80
research_value: 80 m
resolved_fact_id: 9733.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources reviewed did not explicitly confirm hub height for this project. Per the required rule, the linked EuroWindWakes turbine row was used as fallback for hub height.


wind_farm_id: 6674
canonical_id: b14e1493-dd12-4f25-9d6d-4185a929c7fd
wind_farm_name: Rhyl Flats
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 25
resolved_value: 25
research_value: 25
resolved_fact_id: 47118.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 25 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: RWE project page
research_source_type: official operator page
research_source_url: https://uk.rwe.com/locations/rhyl-flats-offshore-wind-farm/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Multiple web sources state 25 turbines. This aligns with the non-web validation signals provided: database winner candidate 25, EuroWindWakes linked count 25, and EMODnet hint 25, so there is no apparent phase/count ambiguity for the built project.


wind_farm_id: 6674
canonical_id: b14e1493-dd12-4f25-9d6d-4185a929c7fd
wind_farm_name: Rhyl Flats
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile
resolved_value: Monopile
research_value: Monopile
resolved_fact_id: 34368.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/sites/default/files/publications/RhylFlats_EnvironmentalMgmtPlan2.2.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Project Environmental Management Plan
source_of_record_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/sites/default/files/publications/RhylFlats_EnvironmentalMgmtPlan2.2.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project environmental management plan explicitly states the 25 foundations each consist of a steel monopile with transition piece; Tethys also lists the foundation type as monopile.


wind_farm_id: 6674
canonical_id: b14e1493-dd12-4f25-9d6d-4185a929c7fd
wind_farm_name: Rhyl Flats
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 12/12/2002
resolved_value: 12/12/2002
research_value: 12/12/2002
resolved_fact_id: 34369.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/sites/default/files/publications/RhylFlats_EnvironmentalMgmtPlan2.2.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Project Environmental Management Plan
source_of_record_url: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/sites/default/files/publications/RhylFlats_EnvironmentalMgmtPlan2.2.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The clearest open project-specific evidence is in the project environmental plan, which states the wind farm scheme is subject to a Section 36 consent dated 12th December 2002. The EIA confirms the project was in the authorisation process under Section 36 and related regimes.


wind_farm_id: 6674
canonical_id: b14e1493-dd12-4f25-9d6d-4185a929c7fd
wind_farm_name: Rhyl Flats
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: NS Energy project news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.nsenergybusiness.com/news/newsrwe_npower_to_build_gbp190_million_offshore_wind_farm_in_wales/

research_summary:
I did not find an authoritative open source explicitly stating an FID date for Rhyl Flats. Available sources show the project was acquired by RWE in 2002 and construction was underway by 2007/2008, but that does not provide a machine-checkable FID milestone.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.nsenergybusiness.com/news/newsrwe_npower_to_build_gbp190_million_offshore_wind_farm_in_wales/


wind_farm_id: 6674
canonical_id: b14e1493-dd12-4f25-9d6d-4185a929c7fd
wind_farm_name: Rhyl Flats
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 15/07/2009
resolved_value: 15/07/2009
research_value: 15/07/2009
resolved_fact_id: 34370.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://data.parliament.uk/DepositedPapers/Files/DEP2010-0040/DEP2010-0040.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: UK Parliament deposited paper
source_of_record_url: https://data.parliament.uk/DepositedPapers/Files/DEP2010-0040/DEP2010-0040.pdf
source_of_record_licence: Open Parliament Licence / public terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The strongest accessible source is the UK Parliament deposited paper, which states: first export of power occurred on 15 July 2009. Secondary reporting and project summaries are consistent with first generation in July 2009.


wind_farm_id: 6674
canonical_id: b14e1493-dd12-4f25-9d6d-4185a929c7fd
wind_farm_name: Rhyl Flats
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2009-12-01
resolved_value: 2009-12-01
research_value: 01/12/2009
resolved_fact_id: 9888.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
RWE’s current page says the wind farm began producing power in December 2009, while Tethys lists commissioning date 01/12/2009 and fully commissioned in 2009. Because one source provides only month/year-level commissioning and the linked turbine metadata also points to 01/12/2009, the table uses 01/12/2009 as normalized month-level date.


wind_farm_id: 6675
canonical_id: 828e8790-33ec-4710-bc09-c2bded38e93c
wind_farm_name: Gwynt y Mor
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://uk.rwe.com/locations/gwynt-y-mor-offshore-wind-farm/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE project page
source_of_record_url: https://uk.rwe.com/locations/gwynt-y-mor-offshore-wind-farm/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Gwynt y Môr Offshore Wind Farm; historic/related naming: Gwynt y Môr Offshore Wind Farm Ltd / Gwynt y Mor

research_value:
Gwynt y Môr Offshore Wind Farm; historic/related naming: Gwynt y Môr Offshore Wind Farm Ltd / Gwynt y Mor

research_summary:
RWE’s live project page names the asset “Gwynt y Môr offshore wind farm”, while older RWE materials and project documents use the same name without the diacritic or with the project-company form. Phase ambiguity was resolved by separating the operational farm from the later Awel y Môr extension proposal.


wind_farm_id: 6675
canonical_id: 828e8790-33ec-4710-bc09-c2bded38e93c
wind_farm_name: Gwynt y Mor
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34426.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE 2025 press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: RWE (originally RWE Innogy / RWE npower renewables). Current owners: RWE 50%, Stadtwerke München GmbH 30%, Macquarie GIG 20%. Operator: RWE

resolved_value:
Developer: RWE (originally RWE Innogy / RWE npower renewables). Current owners: RWE 50%, Stadtwerke München GmbH 30%, Macquarie GIG 20%. Operator: RWE

citation_url:
https://www.rwe.com/en/press/rwe-offshore-wind-gmbh/2025-07-07-wales-largest-offshore-wind-farm-gwynt-y-mor-marks-10-years-powering-the-nation/

research_summary:
Freshest ownership confirmation used is RWE’s 07/07/2025 press release, which states the current JV split as RWE 50%, SWM 30%, Macquarie GIG 20%, and says RWE operates the plant. RWE’s live location page matches that same current structure.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.rwe.com/en/press/rwe-offshore-wind-gmbh/2025-07-07-wales-largest-offshore-wind-farm-gwynt-y-mor-marks-10-years-powering-the-nation/


wind_farm_id: 6675
canonical_id: 828e8790-33ec-4710-bc09-c2bded38e93c
wind_farm_name: Gwynt y Mor
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.greeninvestmentgroup.com/en/news/2015/gibfss-offshore-wind-fund.html
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Green Investment Group 2015 fund release
source_of_record_url: https://www.greeninvestmentgroup.com/en/news/2015/gibfss-offshore-wind-fund.html
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
In 2015, the GIB offshore wind fund completed acquisition of a 10% stake in Gwynt y Môr; current public reporting then shows RWE 50%, Stadtwerke München 30%, and Macquarie GIG 20%

research_value:
In 2015, the GIB offshore wind fund completed acquisition of a 10% stake in Gwynt y Môr; current public reporting then shows RWE 50%, Stadtwerke München 30%, and Macquarie GIG 20%

research_summary:
Green Investment Group’s 13/10/2015 fund announcement says the fund had acquired the unconditional right to a 10% stake in Gwynt y Môr, and its addendum says that acquisition completed on 30/10/2015. The freshest current ownership confirmation is RWE’s 07/07/2025 release showing the current 50/30/20 structure.


wind_farm_id: 6675
canonical_id: 828e8790-33ec-4710-bc09-c2bded38e93c
wind_farm_name: Gwynt y Mor
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 34427.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE 2025 press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.rwe.com/en/press/rwe-offshore-wind-gmbh/2025-07-07-wales-largest-offshore-wind-farm-gwynt-y-mor-marks-10-years-powering-the-nation/

research_summary:
RWE’s 07/07/2025 release marks 10 years of electricity generation and describes Gwynt y Môr as the largest operating renewable energy project in Wales. RWE’s live project page is likewise an operating asset page, not a development page.


wind_farm_id: 6675
canonical_id: 828e8790-33ec-4710-bc09-c2bded38e93c
wind_farm_name: Gwynt y Mor
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 576 MW
resolved_value: 576 MW
research_value: 576 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34428.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE 2025 press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Capacity is consistently given as 576 MW in current RWE material and in Ofgem transmission documentation.


wind_farm_id: 6675
canonical_id: 828e8790-33ec-4710-bc09-c2bded38e93c
wind_farm_name: Gwynt y Mor
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 576 MW
resolved_value: 576 MW
research_value: 576 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34429.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.bondholders.gymofto.co.uk/docs/Gwynt%202022%20Regulatory%20Accounts%20FinalBB%20DG.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Gwynt y Môr OFTO regulatory accounts
source_of_record_url: https://www.bondholders.gymofto.co.uk/docs/Gwynt%202022%20Regulatory%20Accounts%20FinalBB%20DG.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
A project construction document shows the farm as two 288 MW offshore substations, reconciling with a 576 MW project export arrangement. OFTO regulatory accounts state the “declared maximum capacity” of the transmission system was 576 MW; this is the best open proxy found for MEC/export limit.


wind_farm_id: 6675
canonical_id: 828e8790-33ec-4710-bc09-c2bded38e93c
wind_farm_name: Gwynt y Mor
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: SWT-3.6-107
resolved_value: SWT-3.6-107
research_value: SWT-3.6-107
resolved_fact_id: 34430.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://awjmarine.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Gwynt_y_Mor_OWF_LRes.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: AWJ Marine project overview PDF
source_of_record_url: https://awjmarine.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Gwynt_y_Mor_OWF_LRes.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
A project-specific construction document explicitly ties the turbine model to Gwynt y Môr. Current project/owner pages usually state only “3.6 MW Siemens turbines” without the full model code. Project-specific web evidence supports the model, so no dataset fallback was needed for this row.


wind_farm_id: 6675
canonical_id: 828e8790-33ec-4710-bc09-c2bded38e93c
wind_farm_name: Gwynt y Mor
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens
resolved_value: Siemens
research_value: Siemens
resolved_fact_id: 9114.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: AWJ Marine project overview PDF
research_source_type: project document
research_source_url: https://awjmarine.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Gwynt_y_Mor_OWF_LRes.pdf
research_source_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
The project-specific construction document says the turbines “will be supplied by Siemens Wind Power AS”; multiple project references also describe Siemens 3.6 MW turbines at the site.


wind_farm_id: 6675
canonical_id: 828e8790-33ec-4710-bc09-c2bded38e93c
wind_farm_name: Gwynt y Mor
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 107
resolved_value: 107
research_value: 107 m
resolved_fact_id: 9579.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
The AWJ Marine project document explicitly gives a 107 m rotor diameter for Gwynt y Môr. Because openly accessible second-source corroboration tied specifically to this project was weak, the linked EuroWindWakes value was used as the required fallback cross-check and it matches the project document.


wind_farm_id: 6675
canonical_id: 828e8790-33ec-4710-bc09-c2bded38e93c
wind_farm_name: Gwynt y Mor
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 84.4
resolved_value: 84.4
research_value: 84.4 m
resolved_fact_id: 9734.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
The AWJ Marine project document explicitly states “hub height 84.4m LAT”. Because project-specific web corroboration was limited, the linked EuroWindWakes fallback value of 84.4 m was used as the required cross-check and matches the project document.


wind_farm_id: 6675
canonical_id: 828e8790-33ec-4710-bc09-c2bded38e93c
wind_farm_name: Gwynt y Mor
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 159
resolved_value: 159
research_value: 160
resolved_fact_id: 47119.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: RWE 2025 press release
research_source_type: owner press release
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
resolved_source_detail:
Calculated from 159 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations (5 linked turbines also fall within another wind farm geometry)

research_summary:
RWE’s current 2025 release and multiple project references give 160 turbines. This aligns with the provided non-web validation signals: database winner candidate 160, EuroWindWakes linked-turbine count 160, and EMODnet hint 160.


wind_farm_id: 6675
canonical_id: 828e8790-33ec-4710-bc09-c2bded38e93c
wind_farm_name: Gwynt y Mor
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile / transition piece
resolved_value: Monopile / transition piece
research_value: Monopile / transition piece
resolved_fact_id: 34436.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.sika.com/en/reference-projects/gwynt-mor-offshore-wind-farm.html
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Sika project reference
source_of_record_url: https://www.sika.com/en/reference-projects/gwynt-mor-offshore-wind-farm.html
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific construction and supplier references consistently describe monopile foundations with transition pieces. One secondary environmental site mentions “monopile, jacket foundation”, but project-specific installation sources point to monopiles as the as-built foundation type.


wind_farm_id: 6675
canonical_id: 828e8790-33ec-4710-bc09-c2bded38e93c
wind_farm_name: Gwynt y Mor
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 03/12/2008
resolved_value: 03/12/2008
research_value: 03/12/2008
resolved_fact_id: 34437.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: UK government review of consents
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/681b52099ef97b58cce3e4fc/review-of-consents-for-major-infrastructure-projects-spas-sacs.pdf

research_summary:
The UK government’s review of consents lists Gwynt y Môr with “Consent: 03/12/2008” and the same row identifies the project as active/in operation.

source_of_record_url:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/681b52099ef97b58cce3e4fc/review-of-consents-for-major-infrastructure-projects-spas-sacs.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6675
canonical_id: 828e8790-33ec-4710-bc09-c2bded38e93c
wind_farm_name: Gwynt y Mor
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE 2025 press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current accessible RWE and government sources confirm consent and later operation, but I did not find an openly accessible source that explicitly states a project-level Gwynt y Môr FID date. The row remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6675
canonical_id: 828e8790-33ec-4710-bc09-c2bded38e93c
wind_farm_name: Gwynt y Mor
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 30/08/2013
resolved_value: 30/08/2013
research_value: 30/08/2013
resolved_fact_id: 34438.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.offshorewind.biz/2013/08/30/uk-gwynt-y-mor-owf-exports-first-electricity/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Offshore Wind first power report
source_of_record_url: https://www.offshorewind.biz/2013/08/30/uk-gwynt-y-mor-owf-exports-first-electricity/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Offshore Wind reported the project’s first exported electricity on 30/08/2013. This is consistent with later project history pages noting generation began before final completion.


wind_farm_id: 6675
canonical_id: 828e8790-33ec-4710-bc09-c2bded38e93c
wind_farm_name: Gwynt y Mor
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2015-06-01
resolved_value: 2015-06-01
research_value: 01/06/2015
resolved_fact_id: 9889.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
RWE says the project was inaugurated in June 2015 and its 2025 release marks “10 years of electricity generation” from June 2015 to June 2025. Using the month-only rule, this normalizes to 01/06/2015. The linked EuroWindWakes commissioning date also points to 01/06/2015 and supports that month-level conclusion.


wind_farm_id: 6676
canonical_id: d3d6764c-d4c8-4acb-ae1c-15f7c6f6b324
wind_farm_name: Burbo Bank Extension
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/burbo-bank-extension-offshore-wind-farm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/burbo-bank-extension-offshore-wind-farm
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Burbo Bank Extension; also referred to historically as Burbo Bank Extension Offshore Wind Farm and Burbo Bank 2 / Burbo 2 in some project documents

research_value:
Burbo Bank Extension; also referred to historically as Burbo Bank Extension Offshore Wind Farm and Burbo Bank 2 / Burbo 2 in some project documents

research_summary:
The extension phase is consistently identified by Ørsted and UK consent documents as Burbo Bank Extension. Some supply-chain and technical references use shorthand such as Burbo Bank 2 or Burbo 2, but the consented/built project name is Burbo Bank Extension.


wind_farm_id: 6676
canonical_id: d3d6764c-d4c8-4acb-ae1c-15f7c6f6b324
wind_farm_name: Burbo Bank Extension
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34440.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2016/11/first-power-from-dong-energys-burbo-bank-extension
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted first power announcement
source_of_record_url: https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2016/11/first-power-from-dong-energys-burbo-bank-extension
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Burbo Extension Ltd / DONG Energy (now Ørsted). Current equity owners publicly confirmed on accessible web sources: Ørsted 50%, PKA 25%, KIRKBI A/S 25%. Operator: Ørsted

resolved_value:
Developer: Burbo Extension Ltd / DONG Energy (now Ørsted). Current equity owners publicly confirmed on accessible web sources: Ørsted 50%, PKA 25%, KIRKBI A/S 25%. Operator: Ørsted

research_summary:
Ørsted project pages and the original financing announcement show the project company structure and the 50/25/25 split. The freshest accessible ownership signal relied on here is KIRKBI Annual Report 2025 and KIRKBI’s current energy-transition portfolio page, which still list Burbo Bank Extension within KIRKBI’s investment portfolio; this is consistent with Ørsted’s project material and the 2016 ownership announcement. No newer official accessible source found indicating a changed equity split for the generation asset.


wind_farm_id: 6676
canonical_id: d3d6764c-d4c8-4acb-ae1c-15f7c6f6b324
wind_farm_name: Burbo Bank Extension
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: KIRKBI transaction announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
01/01/2010: developed by DONG Energy/Ørsted group; 10/02/2016: DONG Energy divested 50% to PKA and KIRKBI A/S, leaving Ørsted/DONG 50%, PKA 25%, KIRKBI 25%; no later public official source found showing a generation-asset equity transfer

research_value:
01/01/2010: developed by DONG Energy/Ørsted group; 10/02/2016: DONG Energy divested 50% to PKA and KIRKBI A/S, leaving Ørsted/DONG 50%, PKA 25%, KIRKBI 25%; no later public official source found showing a generation-asset equity transfer

citation_url:
https://www.kirkbi.com/press-releases/2016/dong-energy-pka-and-the-lego-group-partner-to-finance-the-258-mw-burbo-bank-extension-offshore-wind-farm-in-the-united-kingdom/

research_summary:
Ownership history is clear from the official 2016 transaction announcement. Freshness check: KIRKBI Annual Report 2025 still references Burbo Bank Extension in KIRKBI’s holdings, supporting continued participation. I found no accessible official source evidencing a later sale of the wind-farm equity itself; Ofgem/Diamond sources relate to the separate OFTO transmission assets, not generation ownership.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.kirkbi.com/press-releases/2016/dong-energy-pka-and-the-lego-group-partner-to-finance-the-258-mw-burbo-bank-extension-offshore-wind-farm-in-the-united-kingdom/


wind_farm_id: 6676
canonical_id: d3d6764c-d4c8-4acb-ae1c-15f7c6f6b324
wind_farm_name: Burbo Bank Extension
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 34441.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted project summary PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://orstedcdn.azureedge.net/-/media/www/docs/corp/uk/updated-project-summaries-06-19/190514_ps_burbo-bank-extension-web_aw.ashx?hash=249AF9E2446AF47A46F41D5F15F3FB82&la=en&rev=704980bb76be4f66b08c39b2ac0ce565

research_summary:
Ørsted’s project summary states the project is fully commissioned and operational, and current OFTO and investor pages treat it as an operating wind farm/transmission link. The exact Boundary Layer label is therefore Operational.

source_of_record_url:
https://orstedcdn.azureedge.net/-/media/www/docs/corp/uk/updated-project-summaries-06-19/190514_ps_burbo-bank-extension-web_aw.ashx?hash=249AF9E2446AF47A46F41D5F15F3FB82&la=en&rev=704980bb76be4f66b08c39b2ac0ce565


wind_farm_id: 6676
canonical_id: d3d6764c-d4c8-4acb-ae1c-15f7c6f6b324
wind_farm_name: Burbo Bank Extension
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 258 MW
resolved_value: 258 MW
research_value: 258 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34442.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ofgem OFTO licence announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/press-release/ofgem-grants-diamond-transmission-partners-bbe-limited-licence-own-link-burbo-bank-extension-wind-farm

research_summary:
Ørsted, Ofgem and supplier references consistently give the installed project capacity as 258 MW. This differs slightly from the database validation context of 256 MW, likely because 32 × 8 MW = 256 MW while official project pages round/report the wind farm as 258 MW gross installed capacity.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/press-release/ofgem-grants-diamond-transmission-partners-bbe-limited-licence-own-link-burbo-bank-extension-wind-farm


wind_farm_id: 6676
canonical_id: d3d6764c-d4c8-4acb-ae1c-15f7c6f6b324
wind_farm_name: Burbo Bank Extension
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 258 MW
resolved_value: 258 MW
research_value: 258 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34443.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.diamondtransmissionpartners.com/our-projects/burbo-bank-extension-ofto
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Diamond Transmission Partners project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.diamondtransmissionpartners.com/our-projects/burbo-bank-extension-ofto
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I did not find an accessible source explicitly labeled “MEC” for the generation asset. However, current Ofgem/Diamond transmission pages describe the OFTO link as a 258 MW connection, which is the best open web proxy for export capability. Treated as moderately confident rather than fully explicit MEC wording.


wind_farm_id: 6676
canonical_id: d3d6764c-d4c8-4acb-ae1c-15f7c6f6b324
wind_farm_name: Burbo Bank Extension
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: V164-8.0 MW
resolved_value: V164-8.0 MW
research_value: V164-8.0 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34444.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted project summary PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://orstedcdn.azureedge.net/-/media/www/docs/corp/uk/updated-project-summaries-06-19/190514_ps_burbo-bank-extension-web_aw.ashx?hash=249AF9E2446AF47A46F41D5F15F3FB82&la=en&rev=704980bb76be4f66b08c39b2ac0ce565

research_summary:
Ørsted project material says Burbo Bank Extension was the first project to use the MHI Vestas V164 8.0 MW turbine. This is directly project-specific.


wind_farm_id: 6676
canonical_id: d3d6764c-d4c8-4acb-ae1c-15f7c6f6b324
wind_farm_name: Burbo Bank Extension
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas
resolved_value: Vestas
research_value: MHI Vestas Offshore Wind
resolved_fact_id: 9115.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Ørsted first power announcement
research_source_type: owner/operator
research_source_url: https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2016/11/first-power-from-dong-energys-burbo-bank-extension
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific Ørsted sources explicitly tie Burbo Bank Extension to MHI Vestas turbines. The linked EuroWindWakes context lists OEM manufacturer as Vestas; I treat that as the required fallback family/OEM lineage context, but the project-specific web evidence names the as-built supplier/OEM as MHI Vestas Offshore Wind.


