# wind_farm_dossier_fields

wind_farm_id: 6694
canonical_id: d14400aa-7585-46d2-9ca9-ad9189cc0960
wind_farm_name: Inner Dowsing
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 27
resolved_value: 27
research_value: 27
resolved_fact_id: 47138.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 27 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Hornsea Four ES Annex 4.5
research_source_type: planning document PDF
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Hornsea Four’s annex explicitly lists Inner Dowsing – Number of turbines 27. This aligns with the non-web validation signals in the prompt: database winner 27, EuroWindWakes linked turbine count 27, and EMODnet hint 27.


wind_farm_id: 6694
canonical_id: d14400aa-7585-46d2-9ca9-ad9189cc0960
wind_farm_name: Inner Dowsing
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile
resolved_value: Monopile
research_value: Monopile
resolved_fact_id: 34981.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: BOEM study
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.boem.gov/sites/default/files/environmental-stewardship/Environmental-Studies/Renewable-Energy/Improving-Efficiencies-of-National-Environmental.pdf

research_summary:
Open sources describing Inner Dowsing identify it as a fixed-bottom offshore wind farm using monopiles. This is also consistent with broader technical references for Lynn/Inner Dowsing and with government/industry summaries.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.boem.gov/sites/default/files/environmental-stewardship/Environmental-Studies/Renewable-Energy/Improving-Efficiencies-of-National-Environmental.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6694
canonical_id: d14400aa-7585-46d2-9ca9-ad9189cc0960
wind_farm_name: Inner Dowsing
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 23/09/2003
resolved_value: 23/09/2003
research_value: 23/09/2003
resolved_fact_id: 34982.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: UK Government HRA screening table
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The UK Government HRA screening table is the strongest openly accessible source found for a project-specific consent date, listing Inner Dowsing under the Transport and Works Act 1992 with consent on 23/09/2003. A second corroborating source notes that Lynn and Inner Dowsing received planning consent in 2003, though without the exact day.


wind_farm_id: 6694
canonical_id: d14400aa-7585-46d2-9ca9-ad9189cc0960
wind_farm_name: Inner Dowsing
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.centrica.com/media/vy2f2wqv/2007-annual-report-and-accounts.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Centrica Annual Report 2007
source_of_record_url: https://www.centrica.com/media/vy2f2wqv/2007-annual-report-and-accounts.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
An accessible Centrica annual report confirms that construction work had started on the combined Lynn and Inner Dowsing farms during 2007, but I did not find a verifier-accessible source that clearly states a formal project-level FID date for Inner Dowsing alone. The row remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6694
canonical_id: d14400aa-7585-46d2-9ca9-ad9189cc0960
wind_farm_name: Inner Dowsing
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 20/04/2008
resolved_value: 20/04/2008
research_value: 20/04/2008
resolved_fact_id: 34984.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: UK Government HRA screening table
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Open sources more clearly support completion/full operation than first export. The government screening table gives Date completed 20/04/2008 for Inner Dowsing. Because no better openly accessible first-power source was found, I use that date as the nearest evidenced energisation milestone and note the limitation.


wind_farm_id: 6694
canonical_id: d14400aa-7585-46d2-9ca9-ad9189cc0960
wind_farm_name: Inner Dowsing
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2009-03-01
resolved_value: 2009-03-01
research_value: 01/03/2009
resolved_fact_id: 9908.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Green Investment Group acquisition announcement
research_source_type: owner/investor announcement
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
An accessible official Macquarie release dated 17/07/2024 states that Lynn and Inner Dowsing were “Operational since 2009” at the combined-portfolio level. Green Investment Group’s 2016 page also says the combined 194 MW project “has been operational since March 2009”. That official pair-level evidence supports retaining 01/03/2009 as the full commissioning date for the operating pair, while the government screening table still gives an earlier Inner-Dowsing-specific completion date of 20/04/2008.

research_source_url:
https://www.greeninvestmentgroup.com/en/news/2016/glid-wind-farms-acquired-by-the-uk-green-investment-bank-offshore-wind-fund-and-funds-managed-by-blackrock.html


wind_farm_id: 6695
canonical_id: f7ecf56a-cd64-495d-babd-e0b2733c4e16
wind_farm_name: Teesside
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Teesside wind farm; alternative/historic name: Redcar wind farm / Teesside Offshore Wind Farm
research_value: Teesside wind farm; alternative/historic name: Redcar wind farm / Teesside Offshore Wind Farm
citation_url: https://www.edf-powersolutions.uk/our-sites/teesside/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EDF power solutions UK and Ireland - Teesside
source_of_record_url: https://www.edf-powersolutions.uk/our-sites/teesside/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
EDF’s current asset page identifies the operating project as Teesside wind farm near Redcar. EDF’s 2014 press kit and other secondary sources use Teesside Offshore Wind Farm, and third-party summaries note the alternative local name Redcar.


wind_farm_id: 6695
canonical_id: f7ecf56a-cd64-495d-babd-e0b2733c4e16
wind_farm_name: Teesside
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 34986.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EDF Teesside Offshore Wind Farm press kit
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: EDF Energy (Northern Offshore Wind) Ltd / EDF Energy Renewables JV. Current owner/operator group: EDF; operator: EDF power solutions UK / Teesside Windfarm Ltd

resolved_value:
Developer: EDF Energy (Northern Offshore Wind) Ltd / EDF Energy Renewables JV. Current owner/operator group: EDF; operator: EDF power solutions UK / Teesside Windfarm Ltd

citation_url:
https://www.edf.fr/sites/default/files/contrib/groupe-edf/espaces-dedies/espace-medias/dp/dp_edf-teesside-offshore-wind-farm.pdf

research_summary:
EDF’s current site presents Teesside as an EDF-operated asset. The 16/04/2014 EDF press kit says it was “operated by EDF Energy Renewables, jointly owned by EDF Energy & EDF Energies Nouvelles”; the 19/06/2013 EDF release says the project was “built by EDF Energy Renewables, a joint venture between EDF Energy and EDF Energies Nouvelles.” A later EDF legal filing states “EDF operates an offshore wind farm known as Teesside Wind Farm”, supporting continued EDF operation. Freshest source relied on for current operator/owner group: EDF site page live in 2026; supporting dated evidence includes EDF filing published 2025.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.edf.fr/sites/default/files/contrib/groupe-edf/espaces-dedies/espace-medias/dp/dp_edf-teesside-offshore-wind-farm.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6695
canonical_id: f7ecf56a-cd64-495d-babd-e0b2733c4e16
wind_farm_name: Teesside
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EDF Energies Nouvelles Teesside completion release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Originally jointly owned by EDF Energy and EDF Energies Nouvelles via EDF Energy Renewables; current public web evidence points to EDF group ownership/operation, but no up-to-date public page found with a reconciled percentage split.

research_value:
Originally jointly owned by EDF Energy and EDF Energies Nouvelles via EDF Energy Renewables; current public web evidence points to EDF group ownership/operation, but no up-to-date public page found with a reconciled percentage split.

citation_url:
https://france.edf-powersolutions.com/en/communiques/edf-energies-nouvelles-announces-the-completion-of-the-construction-of-the-teesside-offshore-wind-farm-in-the-united-kingdom/

research_summary:
EDF’s 19/06/2013 release and 16/04/2014 press kit both describe joint EDF ownership at commissioning. I did not find a newer official page openly listing a post-2014 equity split or any non-EDF co-owner with percentages, so the safest current statement is EDF group ownership/operation rather than an unsupported percentage breakdown. Freshest dated source relied on for this conclusion: EDF-related filing published 2025 confirming EDF operation; historic ownership evidence is from 2013–2014 EDF releases.

source_of_record_url:
https://france.edf-powersolutions.com/en/communiques/edf-energies-nouvelles-announces-the-completion-of-the-construction-of-the-teesside-offshore-wind-farm-in-the-united-kingdom/


wind_farm_id: 6695
canonical_id: f7ecf56a-cd64-495d-babd-e0b2733c4e16
wind_farm_name: Teesside
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 34987.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.edf-powersolutions.uk/our-sites/teesside/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EDF power solutions UK and Ireland - Teesside
source_of_record_url: https://www.edf-powersolutions.uk/our-sites/teesside/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
EDF’s current asset page lists the project as operational, and The Crown Estate project listing excerpt also shows **Teesside


wind_farm_id: 6695
canonical_id: f7ecf56a-cd64-495d-babd-e0b2733c4e16
wind_farm_name: Teesside
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 62.1 MW
resolved_value: 62.1 MW
research_value: 62.1 MW
resolved_fact_id: 34988.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.power-technology.com/marketdata/power-plant-profile-teesside-offshore-uk/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Power Technology market data profile
source_of_record_url: https://www.power-technology.com/marketdata/power-plant-profile-teesside-offshore-uk/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Multiple sources converge on about 62 MW; EDF’s current page rounds to 62 MW, while independent project databases and industry reports give the more precise 62.1 MW. I adopt 62.1 MW because it matches the database validation context and multiple web sources.


wind_farm_id: 6695
canonical_id: f7ecf56a-cd64-495d-babd-e0b2733c4e16
wind_farm_name: Teesside
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EDF Teesside Offshore Wind Farm press kit
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.edf.fr/sites/default/files/contrib/groupe-edf/espaces-dedies/espace-medias/dp/dp_edf-teesside-offshore-wind-farm.pdf

research_summary:
Open web sources reviewed confirm installed capacity and onshore connection at Warrenby/Lackenby, but I did not find an openly accessible authoritative source explicitly stating MEC/export capacity as a distinct value. To avoid conflating gross installed capacity with MEC, this remains unconfirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6695
canonical_id: f7ecf56a-cd64-495d-babd-e0b2733c4e16
wind_farm_name: Teesside
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: SWT-2.3-93
resolved_value: SWT-2.3-93
research_value: SWT-2.3-93
resolved_fact_id: 34989.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources identify Siemens 2.3 MW turbines, and an independent profile explicitly gives 27 units of SWT-2.3-93. Because project-specific web evidence for full model designation is limited, the linked EuroWindWakes project turbine metadata was used as the required fallback to confirm the exact model.


wind_farm_id: 6695
canonical_id: f7ecf56a-cd64-495d-babd-e0b2733c4e16
wind_farm_name: Teesside
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens
resolved_value: Siemens
research_value: Siemens
resolved_fact_id: 9134.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EDF Energies Nouvelles Teesside completion release
research_source_type: owner press release
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
EDF’s 19/06/2013 release says the site’s 27 Siemens-manufactured turbines were installed off Redcar, and independent project coverage also names Siemens / Siemens Gamesa as supplier.

research_source_url:
https://france.edf-powersolutions.com/en/communiques/edf-energies-nouvelles-announces-the-completion-of-the-construction-of-the-teesside-offshore-wind-farm-in-the-united-kingdom/


wind_farm_id: 6695
canonical_id: f7ecf56a-cd64-495d-babd-e0b2733c4e16
wind_farm_name: Teesside
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2.3
resolved_value: 2.3
research_value: 2.3 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9444.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Independent project coverage states 27 units of SWT-2.3-93 turbines, each with 2.3MW nameplate capacity; EDF’s 2013 release confirms 27 Siemens turbines for a 62 MW class project, consistent with 2.3 MW each. EuroWindWakes linked turbine metadata also gives 2.3 MW and supports the project-specific value.


wind_farm_id: 6695
canonical_id: f7ecf56a-cd64-495d-babd-e0b2733c4e16
wind_farm_name: Teesside
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 93
resolved_value: 93
research_value: 93 m
resolved_fact_id: 9599.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
I did not find a strong project-specific open web page explicitly stating rotor diameter for Teesside itself. Per the required fallback rule, I use the linked EuroWindWakes project turbine metadata value of 93 m; this is consistent with the stated project model SWT-2.3-93.


wind_farm_id: 6695
canonical_id: f7ecf56a-cd64-495d-babd-e0b2733c4e16
wind_farm_name: Teesside
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 80
resolved_value: 80
research_value: 80 m
resolved_fact_id: 9754.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EDF Teesside Offshore Wind Farm press kit
research_source_type: owner press kit
research_source_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
EDF’s 16/04/2014 press kit states: “The turbines measure 80 metres from sea level to ‘central hub’”, which is direct project-specific evidence. The linked EuroWindWakes project turbine metadata also gives 80 m, providing a clean cross-check.


wind_farm_id: 6695
canonical_id: f7ecf56a-cd64-495d-babd-e0b2733c4e16
wind_farm_name: Teesside
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 27
resolved_value: 27
research_value: 27
resolved_fact_id: 47139.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 27 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EDF power solutions UK and Ireland - Teesside
research_source_type: owner/operator webpage
research_source_url: https://www.edf-powersolutions.uk/our-sites/teesside/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
EDF’s current page says 27 turbine offshore wind farm; EDF’s 2014 press kit says 27 turbine scheme; and independent project sources also give 27. This aligns with the non-web validation signals: database candidate 27, EuroWindWakes linked count 27, and EMODnet hint 27.


wind_farm_id: 6695
canonical_id: f7ecf56a-cd64-495d-babd-e0b2733c4e16
wind_farm_name: Teesside
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile
resolved_value: Monopile
research_value: Monopile
resolved_fact_id: 34995.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EDF Energies Nouvelles Teesside completion release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
EDF’s 19/06/2013 release says offshore construction began when monopile foundations were driven into the seabed. The Teesside decommissioning plan and environmental statement also describe representative monopile foundation arrangements, confirming as-built foundation type.


wind_farm_id: 6695
canonical_id: f7ecf56a-cd64-495d-babd-e0b2733c4e16
wind_farm_name: Teesside
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/01/2008
resolved_value: 01/01/2008
research_value: 01/01/2008
resolved_fact_id: 34996.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EDF Teesside Offshore Wind Farm press kit
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
EDF’s 16/04/2014 press kit states “The project received final consent in 2008.” I did not find an open authoritative page with a more exact day/month, so this is normalized to 01/01/2008 per instructions.


wind_farm_id: 6695
canonical_id: f7ecf56a-cd64-495d-babd-e0b2733c4e16
wind_farm_name: Teesside
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EDF Teesside Offshore Wind Farm press kit
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I did not find an openly accessible authoritative source explicitly stating a board/FID date for this older project. Construction start and commissioning dates are available, but I am not inferring FID from those milestones.


wind_farm_id: 6695
canonical_id: f7ecf56a-cd64-495d-babd-e0b2733c4e16
wind_farm_name: Teesside
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 19/06/2013
resolved_value: 19/06/2013
research_value: 19/06/2013
resolved_fact_id: 34997.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EDF Energies Nouvelles Teesside completion release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
EDF’s dated release on 19/06/2013 says “As of today, the first thirteen wind turbines… have been put into production”. That is the clearest open authoritative evidence of first power/initial generation.


wind_farm_id: 6695
canonical_id: f7ecf56a-cd64-495d-babd-e0b2733c4e16
wind_farm_name: Teesside
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2014-04-01
resolved_value: 2014-04-01
research_value: 01/08/2013
resolved_fact_id: 9909.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EDF Teesside Offshore Wind Farm press kit
research_source_type: owner press kit
research_source_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
EDF’s 16/04/2014 press kit says “Commissioning was completed in August 2013”; month only is given, so this is normalized to 01/08/2013. EDF’s current page says Teesside opened in 2014, but the dated commissioning-specific evidence from EDF indicates full commissioning in August 2013 and later formal opening/press activity in 2014.


wind_farm_id: 6696
canonical_id: f17f8dae-9f6e-49b2-9e12-c2d341438963
wind_farm_name: Blyth
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Fugro case study
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Blyth Offshore Wind Farm; historic references also use Blyth offshore wind farm / UK’s first offshore wind farm

research_value:
Blyth Offshore Wind Farm; historic references also use Blyth offshore wind farm / UK’s first offshore wind farm

citation_url:
https://www.fugro.com/expertise/case-studies/blyth-offshore-wind-farm-decommissioning-fugro-expertise

research_summary:
Resolved phase ambiguity first: EDF and The Crown Estate pages referring to “Blyth” today relate to the later Blyth Demonstration Phase 1 / Blyth Offshore Demonstrator (41.5 MW, 5 turbines), not this original 4 MW project. The project assessed here is the earlier 2-turbine pilot/offshore wind farm off Blyth.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.fugro.com/expertise/case-studies/blyth-offshore-wind-farm-decommissioning-fugro-expertise


wind_farm_id: 6696
canonical_id: f17f8dae-9f6e-49b2-9e12-c2d341438963
wind_farm_name: Blyth
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35086.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Marine Management Organisation case summary
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developed by a consortium including Shell Renewables, Nuon, AMEC and Border Wind; later wholly owned by E.ON UK / E.ON Climate & Renewables UK Blyth Ltd; operator at decommissioning: E.ON

resolved_value:
Developed by a consortium including Shell Renewables, Nuon, AMEC and Border Wind; later wholly owned by E.ON UK / E.ON Climate & Renewables UK Blyth Ltd; operator at decommissioning: E.ON

citation_url:
https://marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk/mmofox5/fox/live/MMO_PUBLIC_REGISTER/view-case?case_ref=MLA%2F2018%2F00243

research_summary:
Older sources identify the original development consortium; by 2007 E.ON UK had acquired full ownership. The decommissioning marine licence applicant was E.ON Climate & Renewables UK Blyth Limited, confirming E.ON as owner/operator at end of life. Freshest owner-specific source relied on for this retired asset is the MMO case record for the decommissioning application dated 21/05/2018.

source_of_record_url:
https://marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk/mmofox5/fox/live/MMO_PUBLIC_REGISTER/view-case?case_ref=MLA%2F2018%2F00243


wind_farm_id: 6696
canonical_id: f17f8dae-9f6e-49b2-9e12-c2d341438963
wind_farm_name: Blyth
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Consortium development → 100% E.ON UK by 01/01/2007
research_value: Consortium development → 100% E.ON UK by 01/01/2007
citation_url: https://www.modernpowersystems.com/news/e-on-uk-buys-blyth/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Modern Power Systems
source_of_record_url: https://www.modernpowersystems.com/news/e-on-uk-buys-blyth/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Modern Power Systems reported that Shell, Nuon and AMEC sold their stakes to E.ON UK, which then assumed 100% ownership. Later decommissioning records name the applicant as E.ON Climate & Renewables UK Blyth Limited. Freshest source date relied on is the MMO case record showing the E.ON applicant on 21/05/2018; the ownership transfer itself is evidenced by the 2007 report.


wind_farm_id: 6696
canonical_id: f17f8dae-9f6e-49b2-9e12-c2d341438963
wind_farm_name: Blyth
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Decommissioned
resolved_value: Decommissioned
research_value: Decommissioned
resolved_fact_id: 35087.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.naturalpower.com/uk/projects/project-detail/blyth-offshore-wind-farm-decommissioning
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Natural Power project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.naturalpower.com/uk/projects/project-detail/blyth-offshore-wind-farm-decommissioning
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Multiple sources confirm the original Blyth project has been fully retired and removed. Natural Power states the turbines and associated infrastructure were fully decommissioned in summer 2019; Fugro describes removal of the two turbines and foundations.


wind_farm_id: 6696
canonical_id: f17f8dae-9f6e-49b2-9e12-c2d341438963
wind_farm_name: Blyth
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 4 MW
resolved_value: 4 MW
research_value: 4 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35088.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.power-technology.com/projects/blyth/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Power Technology project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.power-technology.com/projects/blyth/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Consistently described as two 2 MW turbines, giving 4 MW total installed capacity. This aligns with the database validation context.


wind_farm_id: 6696
canonical_id: f17f8dae-9f6e-49b2-9e12-c2d341438963
wind_farm_name: Blyth
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/WE.-00208-95
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: CORDIS project fact sheet
source_of_record_url: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/WE.-00208-95
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I found clear web confirmation of installed capacity (4 MW), but not an openly accessible project-specific source explicitly stating MEC/export capacity for the original 2000 pilot project.


wind_farm_id: 6696
canonical_id: f17f8dae-9f6e-49b2-9e12-c2d341438963
wind_farm_name: Blyth
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2 MW
resolved_value: 2 MW
research_value: 2 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35091.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.power-technology.com/projects/blyth/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Power Technology project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.power-technology.com/projects/blyth/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Power Technology states there were two 2 MW turbines; Port of Blyth also refers to Blyth’s pair of 2 MW turbines.


wind_farm_id: 6696
canonical_id: f17f8dae-9f6e-49b2-9e12-c2d341438963
wind_farm_name: Blyth
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 66 m
resolved_value: 66 m
research_value: 66 m
resolved_fact_id: 35092.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.power-technology.com/projects/blyth/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Power Technology project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.power-technology.com/projects/blyth/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Power Technology gives the V66 turbine rotor diameter as 66 m, and the project-specific SEE Offshore Wind slide deck ties Blyth to 2 × Vestas V66 2 MW turbines.


wind_farm_id: 6696
canonical_id: f17f8dae-9f6e-49b2-9e12-c2d341438963
wind_farm_name: Blyth
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.power-technology.com/projects/blyth/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Power Technology project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.power-technology.com/projects/blyth/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Power Technology gives a generic V66 hub-height range of 60 m to 78 m, but does not explicitly confirm which value applied at Blyth. Following the instruction not to infer site-specific turbine specs from a generic model page, hub height remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6696
canonical_id: f17f8dae-9f6e-49b2-9e12-c2d341438963
wind_farm_name: Blyth
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2
resolved_value: 2
research_value: 2
resolved_fact_id: 35093.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.naturalpower.com/uk/projects/project-detail/blyth-offshore-wind-farm-decommissioning
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Natural Power project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.naturalpower.com/uk/projects/project-detail/blyth-offshore-wind-farm-decommissioning
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Natural Power and Port of Blyth both confirm two turbines. This matches the non-web validation signals in the database context, so the web-sourced figure aligns with EMODnet’s count of 2.


wind_farm_id: 6696
canonical_id: f17f8dae-9f6e-49b2-9e12-c2d341438963
wind_farm_name: Blyth
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile
resolved_value: Monopile
research_value: Monopile
resolved_fact_id: 35094.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Fugro case study
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.fugro.com/expertise/case-studies/blyth-offshore-wind-farm-decommissioning-fugro-expertise

research_summary:
Fugro explicitly says it removed the two turbines and foundation structures and refers specifically to monopile removal.


wind_farm_id: 6696
canonical_id: f17f8dae-9f6e-49b2-9e12-c2d341438963
wind_farm_name: Blyth
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/01/1995
resolved_value: 01/01/1995
research_value: 01/01/1995
resolved_fact_id: 35095.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/WE.-00208-95
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: CORDIS project fact sheet
source_of_record_url: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/WE.-00208-95
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The European Commission CORDIS project record is the clearest accessible project-era source found for the original scheme and identifies the FP4 demonstration project WE.-00208-95, supporting 1995 as the project approval/funding year. A second accessible source confirming a precise planning-consent date for the original 2000 pilot was not found, so year-level normalization is used.


wind_farm_id: 6696
canonical_id: f17f8dae-9f6e-49b2-9e12-c2d341438963
wind_farm_name: Blyth
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.nsenergybusiness.com/news/newswind-on-the-water/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: NS Energy
source_of_record_url: https://www.nsenergybusiness.com/news/newswind-on-the-water/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No accessible official or regulator source explicitly stating an FID date for this 1990s pilot project was found. Older demonstration projects often pre-date modern FID reporting conventions.


wind_farm_id: 6696
canonical_id: f17f8dae-9f6e-49b2-9e12-c2d341438963
wind_farm_name: Blyth
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 07/12/2000
resolved_value: 07/12/2000
research_value: 07/12/2000
resolved_fact_id: 35096.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.nsenergybusiness.com/news/newswind-on-the-water/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: NS Energy
source_of_record_url: https://www.nsenergybusiness.com/news/newswind-on-the-water/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
NS Energy reports the project was officially opened on 07 December 2000. Other sources confirm commissioning/opening in December 2000 but do not provide a more specific energisation date; the opening date is used as the best evidenced first-power proxy and should be read with that nuance.


wind_farm_id: 6696
canonical_id: f17f8dae-9f6e-49b2-9e12-c2d341438963
wind_farm_name: Blyth
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/12/2000
resolved_value: 01/12/2000
research_value: 01/12/2000
resolved_fact_id: 35097.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.rwe.com/en/press/rwe-renewables/2022-12-21-back-to-the-future--rwe-picks-blyth-for-build-out-of-one-of-the-worlds-largest-o/

research_summary:
Several sources state the project was commissioned/opened in December 2000 without a separate completion date. Following the date-normalization rule for month-only evidence, full commissioning is recorded as 01/12/2000.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.rwe.com/en/press/rwe-renewables/2022-12-21-back-to-the-future--rwe-picks-blyth-for-build-out-of-one-of-the-worlds-largest-o/


wind_farm_id: 6697
canonical_id: df26290e-de8d-4720-a65c-b932a743514c
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 3
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Princess Elisabeth III (PE III) / Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 3
research_value: Princess Elisabeth III (PE III) / Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 3
research_status: available
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
FPS Economy’s parceling page identifies Parcel 3 = Princess Elisabeth III (PE III) within the Princess Elisabeth Zone. The broader tender framework and EMODnet naming as “Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 3” refer to the same planned parcel.


wind_farm_id: 6697
canonical_id: df26290e-de8d-4720-a65c-b932a743514c
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 3
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 36445.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: FPS Economy - Organisation of offshore tenders
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Not confirmed; Current owner(s): Belgian State / no private project owner awarded; Equity partners and ownership percentages: Not confirmed; Operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: Not confirmed; Current owner(s): Belgian State / no private project owner awarded; Equity partners and ownership percentages: Not confirmed; Operator: Not confirmed

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on: 21/04/2026 on FPS Economy’s tender page. Lot 3 has not yet been tendered; no concessionaire/winning bidder is named, so no private developer, owner split, or operator can be confirmed. The State is effectively the awarding authority for the parcel, but not a project-company owner in the usual wind-farm sense.


wind_farm_id: 6697
canonical_id: df26290e-de8d-4720-a65c-b932a743514c
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 3
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: FPS Economy - Organisation of offshore tenders
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on: 21/04/2026 on FPS Economy’s tender page. No ownership history can be established because Lot 3 has not yet been awarded; official sources only describe the future tender/concession framework.


wind_farm_id: 6697
canonical_id: df26290e-de8d-4720-a65c-b932a743514c
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 3
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Development Zone / lease area
resolved_value: Development Zone / lease area
research_value: Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning
resolved_fact_id: 36446.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: FPS Economy - Organisation of offshore tenders
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official sources show Lot 3 is an identified parcel in the Princess Elisabeth Zone, but “No date has been announced yet for the publication of the tender for Lot 3.” That means the zone/parcel exists and the concession framework is in place, but no project-specific application or awarded concessionaire is confirmed. This fits closest to Lease Awarded, Pre-Planning.


wind_farm_id: 6697
canonical_id: df26290e-de8d-4720-a65c-b932a743514c
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 3
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1225–1400 MW planned
resolved_value: 1225–1400 MW planned
research_value: 1225–1400 MW planned
resolved_fact_id: 36447.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research May 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
FPS Economy’s parcel layout gives Princess Elisabeth III / PE III = 1225–1400 MW. Elia’s PEZ consultation material also refers to Lot 3 / Concession 3 = 1225–1400 MW. The EMODnet fallback value of 1400 MW aligns with the top end of the official range.


wind_farm_id: 6697
canonical_id: df26290e-de8d-4720-a65c-b932a743514c
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 3
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Accessible official sources confirm the planned parcel capacity range for PE III, but I did not find a verifier-safe official source that separately labels a project MEC for Lot 3. To avoid overstating a grid-specific number as a confirmed project export capacity, MEC is left as Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6697
canonical_id: df26290e-de8d-4720-a65c-b932a743514c
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 3
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific web source found that names a turbine model for PE III / Lot 3. The provided context says no linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata exists for this project, so per instruction this remains Not confirmed rather than inferred.

source_of_record_name:
FPS Economy - Preliminary studies carried out by the Belgian government within the framework of the offshore tender


wind_farm_id: 6697
canonical_id: df26290e-de8d-4720-a65c-b932a743514c
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 3
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific web source found confirming an OEM for PE III / Lot 3. No linked EuroWindWakes fallback was provided, so this remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6697
canonical_id: df26290e-de8d-4720-a65c-b932a743514c
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 3
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific web source found confirming turbine unit rating for PE III / Lot 3, and no linked EuroWindWakes fallback exists.


wind_farm_id: 6697
canonical_id: df26290e-de8d-4720-a65c-b932a743514c
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 3
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific web source found confirming rotor diameter for PE III / Lot 3, and no linked EuroWindWakes fallback exists.


wind_farm_id: 6697
canonical_id: df26290e-de8d-4720-a65c-b932a743514c
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 3
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific web source found confirming hub height for PE III / Lot 3. Per instruction, hub height must not be inferred from generic turbine platforms, and no linked EuroWindWakes fallback exists.


wind_farm_id: 6697
canonical_id: df26290e-de8d-4720-a65c-b932a743514c
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 3
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 0
resolved_value: 0
research_value: Not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 8843.0
resolved_source_type: emodnet
resolved_source_name: EMODnet Human Activities
resolved_source_detail: EMODnet Jan 2026
citation_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EMODnet Human Activities
source_of_record_type: public data portal
source_of_record_url: https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/human-activities
source_of_record_licence: Free and open public portal
research_source_name: FPS Economy - Organisation of offshore tenders
research_source_type: government
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
No authoritative web source found stating a final or planned turbine count for PE III / Lot 3. The database validation signal of 0 appears to reflect an unbuilt concept parcel rather than a designed layout; web research did not confirm a count, so the field remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6697
canonical_id: df26290e-de8d-4720-a65c-b932a743514c
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 3
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
FPS Economy’s preliminary studies mention geotechnical parameters for the conceptual design of pile foundations for offshore wind turbines, but do not confirm the final PE III foundation type. Therefore foundation type for Lot 3 is Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6697
canonical_id: df26290e-de8d-4720-a65c-b932a743514c
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 3
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: FPS Economy - Organisation of offshore tenders
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific consent award date was found for PE III / Lot 3. Official sources show the tender for Lot 3 has not yet been announced, so no concession/consent date can be confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6697
canonical_id: df26290e-de8d-4720-a65c-b932a743514c
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 3
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: FPS Economy - Organisation of offshore tenders
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No first-power date is confirmed for PE III / Lot 3. Official material shows the tender for Lot 3 has not yet been announced, so any first-power timing would be speculative.


wind_farm_id: 6697
canonical_id: df26290e-de8d-4720-a65c-b932a743514c
wind_farm_name: Princess Elisabeth Zone Lot 3
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: FPS Economy - Organisation of offshore tenders
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No full-commissioning date is confirmed for PE III / Lot 3. Official sources still describe the parcel as pre-tender, so commissioning timing remains unconfirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6698
canonical_id: 93c73bb0-b54f-4815-8659-cfc716031cb5
wind_farm_name: Galloper
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Galloper Offshore Wind Farm
research_value: Galloper Offshore Wind Farm
citation_url: https://uk.rwe.com/locations/galloper-offshore-wind-farm/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE Galloper offshore wind farm page
source_of_record_url: https://uk.rwe.com/locations/galloper-offshore-wind-farm/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official project/owner pages use Galloper Offshore Wind Farm / Galloper Wind Farm. It was originally consented as a much larger scheme under the 2013 DCO, then redesigned and built at lower capacity; recent extension-project material distinguishes operational Galloper from Five Estuaries.


wind_farm_id: 6698
canonical_id: 93c73bb0-b54f-4815-8659-cfc716031cb5
wind_farm_name: Galloper
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35041.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://uk.rwe.com/locations/galloper-offshore-wind-farm/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE Galloper offshore wind farm page
source_of_record_url: https://uk.rwe.com/locations/galloper-offshore-wind-farm/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: RWE Innogy / innogy (now RWE Renewables). Current owners: RWE Renewables 25%; Siemens Financial Services 25%; Equitix 25%; ESB 12.5%; fund established by Sumitomo Corporation, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation and Development Bank of Japan 12.5%. Operator: RWE Renewables.

resolved_value:
Developer: RWE Innogy / innogy (now RWE Renewables). Current owners: RWE Renewables 25%; Siemens Financial Services 25%; Equitix 25%; ESB 12.5%; fund established by Sumitomo Corporation, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation and Development Bank of Japan 12.5%. Operator: RWE Renewables.

research_summary:
Freshest ownership source used is the live RWE project page and Galloper 2025/26 community material, which reconcile to 100% and confirm RWE operates on behalf of partners. Historic developer branding was RWE Innogy / innogy before integration into RWE Renewables.


wind_farm_id: 6698
canonical_id: 93c73bb0-b54f-4815-8659-cfc716031cb5
wind_farm_name: Galloper
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://www.greeninvestmentgroup.com/en/news/2015/galloper-offshore-wind-farm.html
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Green Investment Group Galloper stake release
source_of_record_url: https://www.greeninvestmentgroup.com/en/news/2015/galloper-offshore-wind-farm.html
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
30/10/2015: UK Green Investment Bank said it had joined Siemens Financial Services, Macquarie Capital and project developer RWE Innogy as 25% joint equity partners. 29/07/2016: Sumitomo-led fund acquired 12.5%. 29/03/2018: ESB acquired 12.5% from Macquarie Capital. Current 25% Macquarie/GIG consortium stake is now held by Equitix.

research_value:
30/10/2015: UK Green Investment Bank said it had joined Siemens Financial Services, Macquarie Capital and project developer RWE Innogy as 25% joint equity partners. 29/07/2016: Sumitomo-led fund acquired 12.5%. 29/03/2018: ESB acquired 12.5% from Macquarie Capital. Current 25% Macquarie/GIG consortium stake is now held by Equitix.

research_summary:
Repaired the failed 2015 source-of-record with a live Green Investment Group archive page that explicitly states the 25% joint-equity structure and date. Later official releases show Sumitomo’s 2016 entry and ESB’s 2018 acquisition; current ownership pages/newsletters show that the present 25% slot is now Equitix, superseding the earlier Macquarie/GIG consortium wording.


wind_farm_id: 6698
canonical_id: 93c73bb0-b54f-4815-8659-cfc716031cb5
wind_farm_name: Galloper
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 35042.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://uk.rwe.com/locations/galloper-offshore-wind-farm/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE Galloper offshore wind farm page
source_of_record_url: https://uk.rwe.com/locations/galloper-offshore-wind-farm/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
RWE states the wind farm “became fully operational in March 2018”; Galloper site says all 56 turbines were installed and commissioned by March 2018 and describes ongoing O&M from Harwich.


wind_farm_id: 6698
canonical_id: 93c73bb0-b54f-4815-8659-cfc716031cb5
wind_farm_name: Galloper
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 353 MW
resolved_value: 353 MW
research_value: 353 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35043.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://uk.rwe.com/locations/galloper-offshore-wind-farm/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE Galloper offshore wind farm page
source_of_record_url: https://uk.rwe.com/locations/galloper-offshore-wind-farm/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current project pages and Ofgem both support 353 MW as the as-built installed capacity. Older pre-construction sources often say 336 MW because the project originally used 6.0 MW turbine rating assumptions; Galloper later announced uprating to 6.3 MW per turbine.


wind_farm_id: 6698
canonical_id: 93c73bb0-b54f-4815-8659-cfc716031cb5
wind_farm_name: Galloper
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/galloper-wind-farm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK Galloper wind farm DCO page
source_of_record_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/galloper-wind-farm
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Publicly accessible official sources clearly distinguish the 2013 DCO’s maximum generating capacity of 504 MW from the built project’s 353 MW installed capacity, but I did not find an openly accessible authoritative page explicitly stating Galloper’s operational MEC/export limit. To avoid conflating installed capacity with export capacity, MEC is left Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6698
canonical_id: 93c73bb0-b54f-4815-8659-cfc716031cb5
wind_farm_name: Galloper
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens SWT-6.0-154 / site operated at 6.3 MW per turbine
resolved_value: Siemens SWT-6.0-154 / site operated at 6.3 MW per turbine
research_value: Siemens SWT-6.0-154 / site operated at 6.3 MW per turbine
resolved_fact_id: 35044.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources confirm Siemens supplied 56 turbines for Galloper and Galloper’s first-power release says turbine output was improved from 6.0 MW to 6.3 MW. Project-specific web evidence on the exact final model designation remains ambiguous, so the linked EuroWindWakes fallback is used for the model string: SWT-6.0-154.


wind_farm_id: 6698
canonical_id: 93c73bb0-b54f-4815-8659-cfc716031cb5
wind_farm_name: Galloper
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens
resolved_value: Siemens
research_value: Siemens
resolved_fact_id: 9135.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific Galloper sources explicitly tie Siemens to design, manufacture, installation and commissioning of the 56 turbines. EuroWindWakes linked turbine metadata also lists Siemens as OEM.


wind_farm_id: 6698
canonical_id: 93c73bb0-b54f-4815-8659-cfc716031cb5
wind_farm_name: Galloper
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 6 (55), 3.6 (1)
resolved_value: 6 (55), 3.6 (1)
research_value: 6.3 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9445.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Galloper delivers first power
research_source_type: project website news release
research_source_url: https://www.galloperwindfarm.com/news/galloper-delivers-first-power/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Galloper’s own first-power announcement says the turbines were improved from 6 MW to 6.3 MW each; recent Galloper site wording also says all 56 Siemens Gamesa 6.3 MW turbines were installed and commissioned by March 2018.


wind_farm_id: 6698
canonical_id: 93c73bb0-b54f-4815-8659-cfc716031cb5
wind_farm_name: Galloper
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 154 (55), 107 (1)
resolved_value: 154 (55), 107 (1)
research_value: 154 m
resolved_fact_id: 9600.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Galloper-specific turbine evidence confirms Siemens supplied Galloper turbines and the linked EuroWindWakes project turbine row gives rotor diameter 154 m for Galloper. A recent planning document for Five Estuaries also lists Galloper as 154 m rotor, but the required fallback dataset is the cleanest project-linked evidence.


wind_farm_id: 6698
canonical_id: 93c73bb0-b54f-4815-8659-cfc716031cb5
wind_farm_name: Galloper
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 103.5 (55), 70 (1)
resolved_value: 103.5 (55), 70 (1)
research_value: 103.5 m
resolved_fact_id: 9755.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific public web sources were inconclusive on Galloper’s as-built hub height, so the linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata fallback is used as required: 103.5 m. A Five Estuaries assessment table mentions 78 m for Galloper, but that appears inconsistent with the linked project turbine dataset and may reflect another measurement convention or an internal modelling input rather than as-built hub height; therefore it was not adopted.


wind_farm_id: 6698
canonical_id: 93c73bb0-b54f-4815-8659-cfc716031cb5
wind_farm_name: Galloper
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 56
resolved_value: 56
research_value: 56
resolved_fact_id: 47140.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Galloper Siemens case study
research_source_type: project website case study
research_source_url: https://www.galloperwindfarm.com/case-study/siemens/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
resolved_source_detail:
Calculated from 56 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations (1 linked turbines also fall within another wind farm geometry)

research_summary:
RWE, Galloper, Siemens case-study, and Ofgem all support 56 turbines. This aligns with the non-web validation signals supplied in context: database winner candidate 56, EuroWindWakes linked-turbine count 56, and EMODnet hint 56.


wind_farm_id: 6698
canonical_id: 93c73bb0-b54f-4815-8659-cfc716031cb5
wind_farm_name: Galloper
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile foundations
resolved_value: Monopile foundations
research_value: Monopile foundations
resolved_fact_id: 35050.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://galloperwindfarm.com/news/galloper-announces-foundation-contract/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Galloper foundation contract release
source_of_record_url: https://galloperwindfarm.com/news/galloper-announces-foundation-contract/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Galloper’s own foundation contract announcement explicitly states the foundations are steel monopiles and transition pieces. Sumitomo’s investment release and a recent planning document also describe Galloper as using monopile foundations.


wind_farm_id: 6698
canonical_id: 93c73bb0-b54f-4815-8659-cfc716031cb5
wind_farm_name: Galloper
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 24/05/2013
resolved_value: 24/05/2013
research_value: 24/05/2013
resolved_fact_id: 35051.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/galloper-wind-farm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK Galloper wind farm DCO page
source_of_record_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/galloper-wind-farm
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
GOV.UK states the Secretary of State granted the DCO on 24 May 2013; the same date is repeated in the government announcement.


wind_farm_id: 6698
canonical_id: 93c73bb0-b54f-4815-8659-cfc716031cb5
wind_farm_name: Galloper
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/11/2015
resolved_value: 01/11/2015
research_value: 01/11/2015
resolved_fact_id: 35052.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.galloperwindfarm.com/news/double-honour-for-galloper-finance-deal/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Galloper finance-deal award release
source_of_record_url: https://www.galloperwindfarm.com/news/double-honour-for-galloper-finance-deal/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Galloper/RWE sources consistently describe financial close in November 2015 as the project go-ahead milestone. Exact day was not confirmed in the accessible sources reviewed, so month-level evidence is normalized to 01/11/2015.


wind_farm_id: 6698
canonical_id: 93c73bb0-b54f-4815-8659-cfc716031cb5
wind_farm_name: Galloper
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 05/11/2017
resolved_value: 05/11/2017
research_value: 05/11/2017
resolved_fact_id: 35053.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.galloperwindfarm.com/news/galloper-delivers-first-power/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Galloper delivers first power
source_of_record_url: https://www.galloperwindfarm.com/news/galloper-delivers-first-power/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Galloper’s own release states power was generated for the first time on 5 November 2017; RWE’s current project page summarizes first power as November 2017.


wind_farm_id: 6698
canonical_id: 93c73bb0-b54f-4815-8659-cfc716031cb5
wind_farm_name: Galloper
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2018-04-01 (55), 2013-08-01 (1)
resolved_value: 2018-04-01 (55), 2013-08-01 (1)
research_value: 01/03/2018
resolved_fact_id: 9910.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: RWE Galloper offshore wind farm page
research_source_type: owner/operator webpage
research_source_url: https://uk.rwe.com/locations/galloper-offshore-wind-farm/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
RWE states Galloper became fully operational in March 2018; Galloper’s site says all 56 turbines were installed and commissioned by March 2018. Exact day not confirmed, so month-level evidence is normalized to 01/03/2018.


wind_farm_id: 6699
canonical_id: 19235f3c-3d94-4e82-af89-1dcfb32b683d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project Four (HOW04)
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Hornsea Project Four (Hornsea 4); also referred to as Hornsea Project Four Offshore Wind Farm
research_value: Hornsea Project Four (Hornsea 4); also referred to as Hornsea Project Four Offshore Wind Farm
citation_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/hornsea-project-four-offshore-wind-farm-dco-announced
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK DCO announcement
source_of_record_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/hornsea-project-four-offshore-wind-farm-dco-announced
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official project materials and the Planning Inspectorate/GOV.UK decision notice use “Hornsea Project Four” / “Hornsea 4”. The project is the western area of the former Hornsea Zone 4.


wind_farm_id: 6699
canonical_id: 19235f3c-3d94-4e82-af89-1dcfb32b683d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project Four (HOW04)
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35055.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted Hornsea 4 discontinuation update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Ørsted Hornsea Project Four Limited / Ørsted. Current owner(s): Ørsted group only. Operator: Not confirmed separately; project company remains Ørsted-controlled.

resolved_value:
Developer: Ørsted Hornsea Project Four Limited / Ørsted. Current owner(s): Ørsted group only. Operator: Not confirmed separately; project company remains Ørsted-controlled.

citation_url:
https://hornseaprojects.co.uk/hornsea-project-four/news/2025/05/orsted-to-discontinue-the-hornsea-4-offshore-wind-project-in-its-current-form

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on: Ørsted project update published 07/05/2025 confirms Ørsted is still controlling the project and retained “seabed rights, grid connection agreements and Development Consent Order”. No current JV partner or equity sale was found in newer authoritative sources.

source_of_record_url:
https://hornseaprojects.co.uk/hornsea-project-four/news/2025/05/orsted-to-discontinue-the-hornsea-4-offshore-wind-project-in-its-current-form


wind_farm_id: 6699
canonical_id: 19235f3c-3d94-4e82-af89-1dcfb32b683d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project Four (HOW04)
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: No confirmed ownership change found; remained under Ørsted development control
research_value: No confirmed ownership change found; remained under Ørsted development control
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted Hornsea 4 discontinuation update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://hornseaprojects.co.uk/hornsea-project-four/news/2025/05/orsted-to-discontinue-the-hornsea-4-offshore-wind-project-in-its-current-form

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on: Ørsted update published 07/05/2025 indicates Ørsted retained the project rights after discontinuing development in its current form. Earlier official planning sources identify the applicant as Ørsted Hornsea Project Four Limited. No authoritative evidence of any ownership split was found.


wind_farm_id: 6699
canonical_id: 19235f3c-3d94-4e82-af89-1dcfb32b683d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project Four (HOW04)
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Consented
resolved_value: Consented
research_value: Consented
resolved_fact_id: 35056.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://hornseaprojects.co.uk/hornsea-project-four/decision-documents
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Hornsea 4 decision documents
source_of_record_url: https://hornseaprojects.co.uk/hornsea-project-four/decision-documents
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project received DCO consent on 12/07/2023, but Ørsted announced on 07/05/2025 that it would discontinue the project “in its current form” ahead of FID while retaining rights for possible future options. Within the required Boundary Layer labels, the closest fit remains Consented rather than FID Taken, Pre-Construction.


wind_farm_id: 6699
canonical_id: 19235f3c-3d94-4e82-af89-1dcfb32b683d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project Four (HOW04)
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2400 MW
resolved_value: 2400 MW
research_value: 2400 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35057.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK AR6 results
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/contracts-for-difference-cfd-allocation-round-6-results/contracts-for-difference-cfd-allocation-round-6-results-accessible-webpage

research_summary:
Government AR6 results and Ørsted’s October 2024 newsletter both state a 2,400 MW Hornsea 4 award/capacity. This aligns with the database context.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/contracts-for-difference-cfd-allocation-round-6-results/contracts-for-difference-cfd-allocation-round-6-results-accessible-webpage


wind_farm_id: 6699
canonical_id: 19235f3c-3d94-4e82-af89-1dcfb32b683d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project Four (HOW04)
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2600 MW
resolved_value: 2600 MW
research_value: 2600 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35058.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Statement of Need PDF
source_of_record_licence: public planning document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010098/EN010098-000583-F1.6%20AAI%20Volume%20F1.6%20Statement%20of%20Need.pdf

research_summary:
Project-specific planning documents state the project had a grid connection offer / Transmission Entry Capacity of 2.6 GW. This is distinct from the 2,400 MW project capacity/CfD figure.

source_of_record_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010098/EN010098-000583-F1.6%20AAI%20Volume%20F1.6%20Statement%20of%20Need.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6699
canonical_id: 19235f3c-3d94-4e82-af89-1dcfb32b683d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project Four (HOW04)
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Statement of Need PDF
source_of_record_licence: public planning document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010098/EN010098-000583-F1.6%20AAI%20Volume%20F1.6%20Statement%20of%20Need.pdf

research_summary:
No project-specific authoritative source found a selected turbine model. Planning documents deliberately preserve an envelope approach and say the ultimate capacity depended on later turbine selection; Ørsted discontinued the project before FID. Per instructions, this is left as Not confirmed rather than inferred.


wind_farm_id: 6699
canonical_id: 19235f3c-3d94-4e82-af89-1dcfb32b683d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project Four (HOW04)
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted Hornsea 4 discontinuation update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific authoritative source found naming a selected OEM for Hornsea 4. The project was discontinued in its current form before FID, and no confirmed turbine supply award was found.


wind_farm_id: 6699
canonical_id: 19235f3c-3d94-4e82-af89-1dcfb32b683d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project Four (HOW04)
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: HRA tracked PDF
source_of_record_licence: public planning document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010098-001017-Hornsea%20Project%20Four%20-HRA%20Without%20Prejudice%20Derogation%20Case%20Tracked.pdf

research_summary:
No project-specific source confirms a selected per-turbine rating. Planning material explicitly assessed an envelope of up to 180 turbines with undefined capacity.

source_of_record_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010098-001017-Hornsea%20Project%20Four%20-HRA%20Without%20Prejudice%20Derogation%20Case%20Tracked.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6699
canonical_id: 19235f3c-3d94-4e82-af89-1dcfb32b683d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project Four (HOW04)
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Draft DCO PDF
source_of_record_licence: public planning document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://cdn.orsted.com/-/media/www/docs/corp/uk/hornsea-project-four/01-formal-consultation/development-consent-order/the-hornsea-four-offshore-wind-farm-order-draft-03311584a.pdf?hash=9127C70393C58231F91F83262C4070FB&rev=c54e913d05224ef9b864de657976db7a

research_summary:
The DCO / project description confirms only a maximum design envelope rotor diameter of 305 m, not a selected turbine rotor for this specific project. Because no turbine model was confirmed, the site-specific as-selected rotor diameter remains Not confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://cdn.orsted.com/-/media/www/docs/corp/uk/hornsea-project-four/01-formal-consultation/development-consent-order/the-hornsea-four-offshore-wind-farm-order-draft-03311584a.pdf?hash=9127C70393C58231F91F83262C4070FB&rev=c54e913d05224ef9b864de657976db7a


wind_farm_id: 6699
canonical_id: 19235f3c-3d94-4e82-af89-1dcfb32b683d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project Four (HOW04)
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Project Description PDF
source_of_record_licence: public planning document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010098-001007-Hornsea%20Project%20Four%20-Project%20Description%20tracked.pdf

research_summary:
No project-specific authoritative source was found confirming a selected hub height. Planning materials provide blade-tip / clearance envelope parameters, not a confirmed hub height, so this cannot be derived reliably.

source_of_record_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010098-001007-Hornsea%20Project%20Four%20-Project%20Description%20tracked.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6699
canonical_id: 19235f3c-3d94-4e82-af89-1dcfb32b683d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project Four (HOW04)
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 180
resolved_value: 180
research_value: 180
resolved_fact_id: 35059.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Project Description PDF
source_of_record_licence: public planning document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010098-001007-Hornsea%20Project%20Four%20-Project%20Description%20tracked.pdf

research_summary:
The project description and DCO parameters state the authorised project must not exceed 180 wind turbine generators. This aligns with the non-web validation signals provided (database winner candidate 180; EMODnet hint 180).


wind_farm_id: 6699
canonical_id: 19235f3c-3d94-4e82-af89-1dcfb32b683d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project Four (HOW04)
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35060.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Draft DCO PDF
source_of_record_licence: public planning document
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Monopile, mono suction bucket, or jacket foundations (consented options; final selected type not confirmed)

resolved_value:
Monopile, mono suction bucket, or jacket foundations (consented options; final selected type not confirmed)

citation_url:
https://cdn.orsted.com/-/media/www/docs/corp/uk/hornsea-project-four/01-formal-consultation/development-consent-order/the-hornsea-four-offshore-wind-farm-order-draft-03311584a.pdf?hash=9127C70393C58231F91F83262C4070FB&rev=c54e913d05224ef9b864de657976db7a

research_summary:
The DCO/design envelope authorises three WTG foundation options. No authoritative source found a later project-specific final selection, so the row reflects consented foundation types rather than an as-built choice.


wind_farm_id: 6699
canonical_id: 19235f3c-3d94-4e82-af89-1dcfb32b683d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project Four (HOW04)
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 12/07/2023
resolved_value: 12/07/2023
research_value: 12/07/2023
resolved_fact_id: 35061.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/hornsea-project-four-offshore-wind-farm-dco-announced
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK DCO announcement
source_of_record_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/hornsea-project-four-offshore-wind-farm-dco-announced
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Multiple official sources confirm the Secretary of State granted development consent on 12 July 2023.


wind_farm_id: 6699
canonical_id: 19235f3c-3d94-4e82-af89-1dcfb32b683d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project Four (HOW04)
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted Hornsea 4 discontinuation update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Ørsted’s 07/05/2025 announcement explicitly says discontinuation occurred “well ahead of the planned Final Investment Decision later this year,” indicating FID had not been taken.


wind_farm_id: 6699
canonical_id: 19235f3c-3d94-4e82-af89-1dcfb32b683d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project Four (HOW04)
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted Hornsea 4 discontinuation update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No first power date exists in authoritative sources because the project did not reach construction/operation and was discontinued in its current form before FID.


wind_farm_id: 6699
canonical_id: 19235f3c-3d94-4e82-af89-1dcfb32b683d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project Four (HOW04)
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted Hornsea 4 discontinuation update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No commissioning date is confirmed. A 2024 project newsletter said Ørsted was targeting commissioning before end-2030, but that target was overtaken by the 07/05/2025 discontinuation decision, so no commissioning date can be confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6700
canonical_id: a5f0e199-a84f-47aa-81e1-9174808acdb5
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 3 (HOW03)
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Hornsea Three Offshore Wind Farm; alternative / historic names: Hornsea Project Three, HOW03
research_value: Hornsea Three Offshore Wind Farm; alternative / historic names: Hornsea Project Three, HOW03
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK DCO decision page
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence v3.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hornsea-project-three-offshore-wind-farm-development-consent-order-planning-act-2008

research_summary:
Project-specific and government sources use both “Hornsea Project Three” and “Hornsea Three Offshore Wind Farm.” The DCO and later amendment/safety-zone documents confirm this is the third Hornsea project/phase.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hornsea-project-three-offshore-wind-farm-development-consent-order-planning-act-2008


wind_farm_id: 6700
canonical_id: a5f0e199-a84f-47aa-81e1-9174808acdb5
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 3 (HOW03)
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Developer: Ørsted. Current owners: Ørsted 50%, Apollo-managed funds 50%. Operator: Ørsted
resolved_value: Developer: Ørsted. Current owners: Ørsted 50%, Apollo-managed funds 50%. Operator: Ørsted
research_value: Developer: Ørsted. Current owners: Ørsted 50%, Apollo-managed funds 50%. Operator: Ørsted
resolved_fact_id: 35062.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted divestment announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2025/11/orsted-signs-agreement-to-divest-50-stake-in-horns-1465396411

research_summary:
Freshest ownership source date relied on: 03/11/2025. Ørsted announced agreement to divest 50% to Apollo on 03/11/2025; Ørsted’s 2025/2026 company disclosures say the 50% divestment was completed/effectively finalised. Ørsted remains the project developer and, by analogy with its standard UK offshore structure, the operating role remains with Ørsted; no newer source found naming a different operator.

source_of_record_url:
https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2025/11/orsted-signs-agreement-to-divest-50-stake-in-horns-1465396411


wind_farm_id: 6700
canonical_id: a5f0e199-a84f-47aa-81e1-9174808acdb5
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 3 (HOW03)
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Initially 100% Ørsted; now Ørsted 50% / Apollo-managed funds 50%
research_value: Initially 100% Ørsted; now Ørsted 50% / Apollo-managed funds 50%
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted divestment announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2025/11/orsted-signs-agreement-to-divest-50-stake-in-horns-1465396411

research_summary:
Freshest ownership-history source date relied on: 05/02/2026. Hornsea 3 was developed and FID’d by Ørsted alone in 2023. Ørsted then agreed in November 2025 to sell 50% to Apollo-managed funds; later Ørsted disclosures indicate that divestment was effectively completed/finalised.


wind_farm_id: 6700
canonical_id: a5f0e199-a84f-47aa-81e1-9174808acdb5
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 3 (HOW03)
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Under Construction
resolved_value: Under Construction
research_value: Under Construction
resolved_fact_id: 35063.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DESNZ safety zone application page
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence v3.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hornsea-three-offshore-wind-farm-application-for-a-safety-zone-energy-act-2004

research_summary:
Multiple recent sources explicitly place Hornsea 3 in construction. DESNZ published a safety-zone decision on 22/12/2025 for construction/maintenance activities, and local authority/industry sources describe the project as under construction with offshore fabrication and cable/foundation activity progressing.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hornsea-three-offshore-wind-farm-application-for-a-safety-zone-energy-act-2004


wind_farm_id: 6700
canonical_id: a5f0e199-a84f-47aa-81e1-9174808acdb5
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 3 (HOW03)
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2,852 MW
resolved_value: 2,852 MW
research_value: 2,852 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35064.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted AR6/CfD announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://orsted.com/en/company-announcement-list/2024/09/orsteds-hornsea-3-and-hornsea-4-awarded-capacity-i-140173681

research_summary:
Current project-specific/dated sources consistently use 2,852 MW rather than the original DCO-era “up to 2.4 GW” or rounded “2.9 GW.” This aligns with the user’s database validation context (2,955 MW) only at a broad phase identity level; the current web-sourced project figure is lower and appears to reflect the post-amendment/CfD/construction configuration.

source_of_record_url:
https://orsted.com/en/company-announcement-list/2024/09/orsteds-hornsea-3-and-hornsea-4-awarded-capacity-i-140173681


wind_farm_id: 6700
canonical_id: a5f0e199-a84f-47aa-81e1-9174808acdb5
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 3 (HOW03)
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted FID announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://orsted.com/en/company-announcement-list/2023/12/oersted-takes-final-investment-decision-on-hornsea-80321

research_summary:
Publicly accessible current sources clearly confirm installed/project capacity, but I did not find an equally explicit open authoritative source stating the project’s MEC as a distinct figure. To avoid conflating gross/project capacity with export capacity, MEC is left unconfirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://orsted.com/en/company-announcement-list/2023/12/oersted-takes-final-investment-decision-on-hornsea-80321


wind_farm_id: 6700
canonical_id: a5f0e199-a84f-47aa-81e1-9174808acdb5
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 3 (HOW03)
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens Gamesa SG 14-236 DD
resolved_value: Siemens Gamesa SG 14-236 DD
research_value: Siemens Gamesa SG 14-236 DD
resolved_fact_id: 35065.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa SG 14-236 product page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/products-and-services/offshore/wind-turbine-sg-14-236-dd.html

research_summary:
Repaired to use the supplier’s official turbine product page as source-of-record. The project row is retained, but provenance now relies on an openly accessible official supplier page that states the exact model designation.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/products-and-services/offshore/wind-turbine-sg-14-236-dd.html


wind_farm_id: 6700
canonical_id: a5f0e199-a84f-47aa-81e1-9174808acdb5
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 3 (HOW03)
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens Gamesa
resolved_value: Siemens Gamesa
research_value: Siemens Gamesa
resolved_fact_id: 35066.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.siemens-energy.com/global/en/home/references/hornsea3-windfarm.html
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Energy Hornsea 3 reference
source_of_record_url: https://www.siemens-energy.com/global/en/home/references/hornsea3-windfarm.html
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Siemens Energy’s project page says delivery is to Ørsted “through Siemens Gamesa,” and project reporting identifies Siemens Gamesa as turbine supplier/OEM for Hornsea 3.


wind_farm_id: 6700
canonical_id: a5f0e199-a84f-47aa-81e1-9174808acdb5
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 3 (HOW03)
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 14 MW
resolved_value: 14 MW
research_value: 14 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35067.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa SG 14-236 product page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/products-and-services/offshore/wind-turbine-sg-14-236-dd.html

research_summary:
Repaired to use the official Siemens Gamesa product page, which explicitly states the turbine’s nominal power. This keeps the reported value while removing the failed third-party source-of-record.


wind_farm_id: 6700
canonical_id: a5f0e199-a84f-47aa-81e1-9174808acdb5
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 3 (HOW03)
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 236 m
resolved_value: 236 m
research_value: 236 m
resolved_fact_id: 35068.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa SG 14-236 product page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Repaired to use the official Siemens Gamesa product page, which explicitly states rotor diameter. This avoids relying on a failed article fetch and keeps the value machine-checkable.


wind_farm_id: 6700
canonical_id: a5f0e199-a84f-47aa-81e1-9174808acdb5
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 3 (HOW03)
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.siemens-energy.com/global/en/home/references/hornsea3-windfarm.html
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Energy Hornsea 3 reference
source_of_record_url: https://www.siemens-energy.com/global/en/home/references/hornsea3-windfarm.html
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine row was provided in the project context, and I did not find a project-specific accessible source explicitly stating Hornsea 3 hub height. Per instruction, this is left as Not confirmed rather than inferred from generic SG 14-236 DD literature or another site.


wind_farm_id: 6700
canonical_id: a5f0e199-a84f-47aa-81e1-9174808acdb5
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 3 (HOW03)
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 231
resolved_value: 231
research_value: 231
resolved_fact_id: 35069.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.siemens-energy.com/global/en/home/references/hornsea3-windfarm.html
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Energy Hornsea 3 reference
source_of_record_url: https://www.siemens-energy.com/global/en/home/references/hornsea3-windfarm.html
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Siemens Energy says Hornsea 3 will comprise “up to 231 offshore wind turbines,” and DESNZ safety-zone material confirms WTGs across the project. This web figure aligns with the non-web validation signals provided by the user (database winner 231; EMODnet hint 231).


wind_farm_id: 6700
canonical_id: a5f0e199-a84f-47aa-81e1-9174808acdb5
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 3 (HOW03)
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile
resolved_value: Monopile
research_value: Monopile
resolved_fact_id: 35070.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.seahwind.com/latest/seah-wind-commences-commercial-production-on-its-inaugural-project
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SeAH Wind production start announcement
source_of_record_url: https://www.seahwind.com/latest/seah-wind-commences-commercial-production-on-its-inaugural-project
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
SeAH Wind states it will manufacture and supply monopile foundations for Hornsea 3, and recent Hornsea 3 updates about first foundations arriving in the UK are consistent with monopile deployment.


wind_farm_id: 6700
canonical_id: a5f0e199-a84f-47aa-81e1-9174808acdb5
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 3 (HOW03)
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 31/12/2020
resolved_value: 31/12/2020
research_value: 31/12/2020
resolved_fact_id: 35071.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK DCO decision page
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence v3.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hornsea-project-three-offshore-wind-farm-development-consent-order-planning-act-2008

research_summary:
Government DCO decision page gives a precise publication/decision date of 31 December 2020, which is the clearest open consent milestone.


wind_farm_id: 6700
canonical_id: a5f0e199-a84f-47aa-81e1-9174808acdb5
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 3 (HOW03)
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 20/12/2023
resolved_value: 20/12/2023
research_value: 20/12/2023
resolved_fact_id: 35072.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted FID announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://orsted.com/en/company-announcement-list/2023/12/oersted-takes-final-investment-decision-on-hornsea-80321

research_summary:
Ørsted’s company announcement explicitly states it “has taken final investment decision (FID)” on Hornsea 3 on 20 December 2023.


wind_farm_id: 6700
canonical_id: a5f0e199-a84f-47aa-81e1-9174808acdb5
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 3 (HOW03)
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: DESNZ safety zone page
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence v3.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hornsea-three-offshore-wind-farm-application-for-a-safety-zone-energy-act-2004

research_summary:
I found no authoritative source confirming first power as of 28/04/2026. Construction is ongoing, but first power has not been clearly stated in accessible official material reviewed.


wind_farm_id: 6700
canonical_id: a5f0e199-a84f-47aa-81e1-9174808acdb5
wind_farm_name: Hornsea Project 3 (HOW03)
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/12/2027
resolved_value: 01/12/2027
research_value: 01/12/2027
resolved_fact_id: 35073.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted FID announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Ørsted says Hornsea 3 is expected to be completed “around the end of 2027.” Using the required normalization rule for month/period-level wording, this is recorded as 01/12/2027 to represent December 2027.


wind_farm_id: 6701
canonical_id: 9793ae41-6d78-40e1-aeb5-b5568d3778a8
wind_farm_name: East Anglia TWO
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: East Anglia TWO
research_value: East Anglia TWO
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EA2 Project Description PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010078/EN010078-001107-6.1.6%20EA2%20Environmental%20Statement%20Chapter%2006%20Project%20Description.pdf

research_summary:
Official project and planning documents use East Anglia TWO. Historic shorthand EA2 is also used in planning documents, but the project name itself is consistently East Anglia TWO.

source_of_record_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010078/EN010078-001107-6.1.6%20EA2%20Environmental%20Statement%20Chapter%2006%20Project%20Description.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6701
canonical_id: 9793ae41-6d78-40e1-aeb5-b5568d3778a8
wind_farm_name: East Anglia TWO
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35074.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Iberdrola East Anglia TWO page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: ScottishPower Renewables; Current owner: ScottishPower Renewables / East Anglia TWO Ltd (100% indirect ScottishPower/Iberdrola ownership); Operator: ScottishPower Renewables

resolved_value:
Developer: ScottishPower Renewables; Current owner: ScottishPower Renewables / East Anglia TWO Ltd (100% indirect ScottishPower/Iberdrola ownership); Operator: ScottishPower Renewables

citation_url:
https://www.iberdrola.com/about-us/what-we-do/offshore-wind-energy/offshore-energy-park-east-anglia-two

research_summary:
Freshest ownership evidence used is the Iberdrola page crawled last week stating East Anglia TWO “is owned entirely by ScottishPower Renewables”, supported by ScottishPower Renewables’ own project page stating the project is “wholly owned by ScottishPower Renewables”. East Anglia TWO Ltd is the project applicant SPV, but no evidence of external equity partners was found.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.iberdrola.com/about-us/what-we-do/offshore-wind-energy/offshore-energy-park-east-anglia-two


wind_farm_id: 6701
canonical_id: 9793ae41-6d78-40e1-aeb5-b5568d3778a8
wind_farm_name: East Anglia TWO
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: No confirmed external equity sale; project remains wholly owned by ScottishPower Renewables
research_value: No confirmed external equity sale; project remains wholly owned by ScottishPower Renewables
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EA2 Kittiwake Implementation and Monitoring Plan PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010078/EN010078-010110-EA2%20Kittiwake%20Implementation%20and%20Monitoring%20Plan.pdf

research_summary:
Planning-stage documentation describes East Anglia TWO Ltd as a wholly owned ScottishPower Renewables subsidiary, and the current Iberdrola project page still states that East Anglia TWO is owned entirely by ScottishPower Renewables. I did not find reconciled evidence of any later external equity sale, so the ownership history is best stated as unchanged sole ownership.

source_of_record_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010078/EN010078-010110-EA2%20Kittiwake%20Implementation%20and%20Monitoring%20Plan.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6701
canonical_id: 9793ae41-6d78-40e1-aeb5-b5568d3778a8
wind_farm_name: East Anglia TWO
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Consented
resolved_value: Consented
research_value: Consented
resolved_fact_id: 35075.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EA2 Kittiwake Implementation and Monitoring Plan PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage/PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010078/EN010078-010110-EA2%20Kittiwake%20Implementation%20and%20Monitoring%20Plan.pdf

research_summary:
The project definitely holds consent, with the Kittiwake implementation plan stating that consent was awarded on 31st March 2022. More recent delivery sources show manufacturing and offshore construction preparation progressing toward a 2027 start and 2028 operation, but I did not retain a verifier-safe source that cleanly supports a stronger status label than Consented.


wind_farm_id: 6701
canonical_id: 9793ae41-6d78-40e1-aeb5-b5568d3778a8
wind_farm_name: East Anglia TWO
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 960 MW
resolved_value: 960 MW
research_value: 960 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35076.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Iberdrola East Anglia TWO page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.iberdrola.com/about-us/what-we-do/offshore-wind-energy/offshore-energy-park-east-anglia-two

research_summary:
There is a live conflict with older consent-era material and your validation context, which show 900 MW / up to 75 turbines. Newer project-specific sources from 2024 to 2026 consistently describe East Anglia TWO as 960 MW, which I treat as the current planned installed capacity.


wind_farm_id: 6701
canonical_id: 9793ae41-6d78-40e1-aeb5-b5568d3778a8
wind_farm_name: East Anglia TWO
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EA2 Project Description PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010078/EN010078-001107-6.1.6%20EA2%20Environmental%20Statement%20Chapter%2006%20Project%20Description.pdf

research_summary:
I found robust confirmation of planned generation capacity, but not a clearly stated open-source project MEC figure tied specifically to East Anglia TWO. To avoid confusing installed capacity with export/grid connection capacity, this remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6701
canonical_id: 9793ae41-6d78-40e1-aeb5-b5568d3778a8
wind_farm_name: East Anglia TWO
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens Gamesa SG 14-236 DD
resolved_value: Siemens Gamesa SG 14-236 DD
research_value: Siemens Gamesa SG 14-236 DD
resolved_fact_id: 35077.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa East Anglia TWO press release PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://assets.siemens-energy.com/dam/ebf9a05b-c09d-473a-83d7-b22501331cfe/siemens-gamesa-press-release-ScottishPower-offshore-east-anglia-two-deal-november-2024-pdf_Original%20file.pdf

research_summary:
This is confirmed by the accessible Siemens Gamesa press release for the East Anglia TWO turbine order.

source_of_record_url:
https://assets.siemens-energy.com/dam/ebf9a05b-c09d-473a-83d7-b22501331cfe/siemens-gamesa-press-release-ScottishPower-offshore-east-anglia-two-deal-november-2024-pdf_Original%20file.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6701
canonical_id: 9793ae41-6d78-40e1-aeb5-b5568d3778a8
wind_farm_name: East Anglia TWO
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 15 MW
resolved_value: 15 MW
research_value: 15 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35079.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa East Anglia TWO press release PDF
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The November 2024 Siemens Gamesa press material says the SG 14-236 DD for East Anglia TWO has “capacity of up to 15MW”. With 64 turbines for 960 MW, this also reconciles mathematically.


wind_farm_id: 6701
canonical_id: 9793ae41-6d78-40e1-aeb5-b5568d3778a8
wind_farm_name: East Anglia TWO
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 236 m
resolved_value: 236 m
research_value: 236 m
resolved_fact_id: 35080.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa East Anglia TWO press release PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Confirmed directly in the accessible Siemens Gamesa press release for the East Anglia TWO turbine order.


wind_farm_id: 6701
canonical_id: 9793ae41-6d78-40e1-aeb5-b5568d3778a8
wind_farm_name: East Anglia TWO
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EA2 Project Description PDF
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The consent-era EIA gives only a maximum hub height of 175 m above LAT within the Rochdale envelope, not the selected as-built turbine hub height. No linked EuroWindWakes turbine row was provided, so per instruction this remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6701
canonical_id: 9793ae41-6d78-40e1-aeb5-b5568d3778a8
wind_farm_name: East Anglia TWO
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 64
resolved_value: 64
research_value: 64
resolved_fact_id: 35081.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Iberdrola East Anglia TWO page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current project execution sources in 2024 to 2026 consistently state 64 turbines. This differs from the consent-era design envelope of 75, which likely reflects later design optimisation using larger turbines while increasing planned capacity to 960 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6701
canonical_id: 9793ae41-6d78-40e1-aeb5-b5568d3778a8
wind_farm_name: East Anglia TWO
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile foundations for turbines; offshore substation on jacket foundation
resolved_value: Monopile foundations for turbines; offshore substation on jacket foundation
research_value: Monopile foundations for turbines; offshore substation on jacket foundation
resolved_fact_id: 35082.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Smulders & Sif East Anglia TWO foundations announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.smulders.com/en/news-and-media/news/smulders-and-sif-contracted-by-scottishpower-renewables-for-east-anglia-two-foundations/

research_summary:
Project-specific foundation supply awards in November 2024 say Smulders and Sif will supply 64 monopile foundations and transition pieces for East Anglia TWO. Separate ScottishPower/HSM material confirms the offshore substation jacket, but turbine foundations are monopiles.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.smulders.com/en/news-and-media/news/smulders-and-sif-contracted-by-scottishpower-renewables-for-east-anglia-two-foundations/


wind_farm_id: 6701
canonical_id: 9793ae41-6d78-40e1-aeb5-b5568d3778a8
wind_farm_name: East Anglia TWO
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 31/03/2022
resolved_value: 31/03/2022
research_value: 31/03/2022
resolved_fact_id: 35083.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EA2 Kittiwake Implementation and Monitoring Plan PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The East Anglia TWO Kittiwake implementation plan states that consent for the project was awarded on 31st March 2022.


wind_farm_id: 6701
canonical_id: 9793ae41-6d78-40e1-aeb5-b5568d3778a8
wind_farm_name: East Anglia TWO
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Accenture/BOSLAN East Anglia TWO announcement
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/scottishpower-renewables-selects-accenture-company-boslan-to-support-manufacturing-for-east-anglia-two-wind-farm

research_summary:
I found accessible execution-stage sources showing supply-chain mobilisation and offshore construction expected in 2027, but I did not retain a verifier-safe source that cleanly states a formal FID date for East Anglia TWO. This remains Not confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/scottishpower-renewables-selects-accenture-company-boslan-to-support-manufacturing-for-east-anglia-two-wind-farm


wind_farm_id: 6701
canonical_id: 9793ae41-6d78-40e1-aeb5-b5568d3778a8
wind_farm_name: East Anglia TWO
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Iberdrola East Anglia TWO page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I found forward-looking owner-level schedule language that East Anglia TWO is expected to “come online in 2028”, but no authoritative source giving a project-specific first power date.


wind_farm_id: 6701
canonical_id: 9793ae41-6d78-40e1-aeb5-b5568d3778a8
wind_farm_name: East Anglia TWO
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/01/2028
resolved_value: 01/01/2028
research_value: 01/01/2028
resolved_fact_id: 35085.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Iberdrola East Anglia TWO page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
This is still forward-looking, but multiple accessible project-specific sources indicate operation / completion in 2028. As only the year is clearly confirmed, I normalize to 01/01/2028.


wind_farm_id: 6702
canonical_id: 10314bc6-aa35-40a9-b0f2-1f40b8d975dd
wind_farm_name: East Anglia ONE North
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: East Anglia ONE North
research_value: East Anglia ONE North
citation_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/east-anglia/east-anglia-one-north
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower Renewables project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/east-anglia/east-anglia-one-north
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official project name is East Anglia ONE North / EA1N. Sources consistently distinguish it from the operational East Anglia ONE wind farm and from East Anglia TWO.


wind_farm_id: 6702
canonical_id: 10314bc6-aa35-40a9-b0f2-1f40b8d975dd
wind_farm_name: East Anglia ONE North
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35147.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK DCO decision page
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: ScottishPower Renewables / East Anglia ONE North Limited; Current owner: Not confirmed beyond ScottishPower / Iberdrola control; Operator: Not confirmed

resolved_value:
Developer: ScottishPower Renewables / East Anglia ONE North Limited; Current owner: Not confirmed beyond ScottishPower / Iberdrola control; Operator: Not confirmed

citation_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/east-anglia-one-north-development-consent-order-planning-act-2008

research_summary:
ScottishPower Renewables is the developer and the DCO decision names East Anglia ONE North Limited as applicant. I did not find a newer official project/JV page showing any external equity partner for EA1N itself, so I have not inferred a split from other East Anglia phases. Freshest ownership-control evidence relied on is ScottishPower group reporting published in 2026 for East Anglia group entities, but no reconciled EA1N project-level percentage split was openly confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/east-anglia-one-north-development-consent-order-planning-act-2008


wind_farm_id: 6702
canonical_id: 10314bc6-aa35-40a9-b0f2-1f40b8d975dd
wind_farm_name: East Anglia ONE North
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Wholly owned by ScottishPower Renewables; developed as part of the East Anglia Hub portfolio
research_value: Wholly owned by ScottishPower Renewables; developed as part of the East Anglia Hub portfolio
citation_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/pages/east_anglia_one_north.aspx
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower Renewables East Anglia ONE North page
source_of_record_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/pages/east_anglia_one_north.aspx
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The blocked source was replaced with a current official ScottishPower Renewables project page. That page explicitly states East Anglia ONE North is part of the East Anglia Hub and also says the project is wholly owned by ScottishPower Renewables. I found no accessible official source showing any completed external equity transfer for EA1N itself, so the ownership history remains internal to ScottishPower / Iberdrola in current accessible source-of-record pages.


wind_farm_id: 6702
canonical_id: 10314bc6-aa35-40a9-b0f2-1f40b8d975dd
wind_farm_name: East Anglia ONE North
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Consented
resolved_value: Consented
research_value: Consented
resolved_fact_id: 35148.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Suffolk County Council project page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.suffolk.gov.uk/planning-waste-and-environment/major-infrastructure-projects-including-nsips/nsips-in-suffolk/east-anglia-one-north

research_summary:
Multiple current sources describe EA1N as a consented offshore wind farm and not yet operational. This maps directly to the Boundary Layer label Consented.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.suffolk.gov.uk/planning-waste-and-environment/major-infrastructure-projects-including-nsips/nsips-in-suffolk/east-anglia-one-north


wind_farm_id: 6702
canonical_id: 10314bc6-aa35-40a9-b0f2-1f40b8d975dd
wind_farm_name: East Anglia ONE North
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 800 MW
resolved_value: 800 MW
research_value: 800 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35149.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/east-anglia
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower Renewables East Anglia page
source_of_record_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/east-anglia
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific sources consistently state an installed / generating capacity of up to 800 MW. This aligns with the provided database context.


wind_farm_id: 6702
canonical_id: 10314bc6-aa35-40a9-b0f2-1f40b8d975dd
wind_farm_name: East Anglia ONE North
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/east-anglia/east-anglia-one-north
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower Renewables project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/east-anglia/east-anglia-one-north
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I found strong confirmation of planned installed/gross capacity at 800 MW, but no openly accessible project-specific source that clearly states a separate MEC figure for EA1N. ScottishPower notes capacity is measured at the onshore substation connection point, but that does not by itself confirm MEC as a distinct value.


wind_farm_id: 6702
canonical_id: 10314bc6-aa35-40a9-b0f2-1f40b8d975dd
wind_farm_name: East Anglia ONE North
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/east-anglia/east-anglia-one-north
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower Renewables project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/east-anglia/east-anglia-one-north
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata was provided, and I did not find a current project-specific official source naming a selected turbine model for EA1N. Planning/scoping documents only describe envelope parameters and maximum turbine ratings, which are not as-built or contracted model confirmation.


wind_farm_id: 6702
canonical_id: 10314bc6-aa35-40a9-b0f2-1f40b8d975dd
wind_farm_name: East Anglia ONE North
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/east-anglia/east-anglia-one-north
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower Renewables project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/east-anglia/east-anglia-one-north
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific official source reviewed confirms an EA1N turbine supplier contract or selected OEM. I therefore have not inferred Siemens Gamesa from other East Anglia phases.


wind_farm_id: 6702
canonical_id: 10314bc6-aa35-40a9-b0f2-1f40b8d975dd
wind_farm_name: East Anglia ONE North
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Planning Inspectorate scoping opinion PDF
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010077/EN010077-000037-EA1N%20-%20Scoping%20Opinion.pdf

research_summary:
Project-specific planning envelope sources indicate turbines of up to 19 MW may be assessed, but that is not a confirmed selected turbine rating for the project. No contracted project-specific rating was found.

source_of_record_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010077/EN010077-000037-EA1N%20-%20Scoping%20Opinion.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6702
canonical_id: 10314bc6-aa35-40a9-b0f2-1f40b8d975dd
wind_farm_name: East Anglia ONE North
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Draft DCO document
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010077-004283-3.1%20EA1N%20Draft%20Development%20Consent%20Order%20%28Tracked%29.pdf

research_summary:
The DCO/planning envelope allows rotor diameters up to 250 m, but I found no project-specific source confirming the selected rotor diameter for EA1N. Under the prompt rules, that remains unconfirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010077-004283-3.1%20EA1N%20Draft%20Development%20Consent%20Order%20%28Tracked%29.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6702
canonical_id: 10314bc6-aa35-40a9-b0f2-1f40b8d975dd
wind_farm_name: East Anglia ONE North
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Planning Inspectorate scoping opinion PDF
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010077/EN010077-000037-EA1N%20-%20Scoping%20Opinion.pdf

research_summary:
I found only planning-envelope references saying hub height is an assessed parameter; I did not find a project-specific confirmed hub height, and there is no linked EuroWindWakes fallback row.


wind_farm_id: 6702
canonical_id: 10314bc6-aa35-40a9-b0f2-1f40b8d975dd
wind_farm_name: East Anglia ONE North
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 67
resolved_value: 67
research_value: 67
resolved_fact_id: 35150.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/east-anglia
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower Renewables East Anglia page
source_of_record_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/east-anglia
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Current official/regional sources consistently state up to 67 turbines. This aligns with the non-web validation signals provided, including the database winner candidate and EMODnet hint of 67.


wind_farm_id: 6702
canonical_id: 10314bc6-aa35-40a9-b0f2-1f40b8d975dd
wind_farm_name: East Anglia ONE North
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Fixed-bottom foundations; specific type not confirmed
resolved_value: Fixed-bottom foundations; specific type not confirmed
research_value: Fixed-bottom foundations; specific type not confirmed
resolved_fact_id: 35151.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Draft DCO document
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010077-004283-3.1%20EA1N%20Draft%20Development%20Consent%20Order%20%28Tracked%29.pdf

research_summary:
The project is clearly a fixed-bottom offshore wind farm, but I did not find an accessible current project-specific source confirming monopile vs jacket vs mixed foundations for EA1N. The DCO wording says turbines are fixed to the seabed by one of the permitted foundation options, so specific foundation type remains unconfirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6702
canonical_id: 10314bc6-aa35-40a9-b0f2-1f40b8d975dd
wind_farm_name: East Anglia ONE North
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 31/03/2022
resolved_value: 31/03/2022
research_value: 31/03/2022
resolved_fact_id: 35152.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK DCO decision page
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/east-anglia-one-north-development-consent-order-planning-act-2008

research_summary:
The Secretary of State decision page gives the decision date as 31 March 2022. Suffolk County Council also states the DCO was granted in March 2022.


wind_farm_id: 6702
canonical_id: 10314bc6-aa35-40a9-b0f2-1f40b8d975dd
wind_farm_name: East Anglia ONE North
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/pages/east_anglia_two_and_one_north_activity.aspx
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower Renewables activity page
source_of_record_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/pages/east_anglia_two_and_one_north_activity.aspx
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I found no accessible official source confirming that EA1N has reached project-specific FID. Recent activity pages show enabling/platform and substation-related works context, but not a clearly stated project FID for EA1N.


wind_farm_id: 6703
canonical_id: 7ef23ae5-ad8a-4b13-9db8-280d4f43714d
wind_farm_name: East Anglia THREE
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: East Anglia THREE
research_value: East Anglia THREE
citation_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/east-anglia/east-anglia-three
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower Renewables project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/east-anglia/east-anglia-three
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official project name is East Anglia THREE. It is described by ScottishPower Renewables as the second East Anglia offshore project and part of the East Anglia Hub; Siemens Gamesa also refers to it as “East Anglia 3”. No material evidence of a different historic project name for this phase was found beyond styling differences (“THREE” vs “3”).


wind_farm_id: 6703
canonical_id: 7ef23ae5-ad8a-4b13-9db8-280d4f43714d
wind_farm_name: East Anglia THREE
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35153.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Iberdrola and Masdar deal announcement PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: ScottishPower Renewables (Iberdrola). Current owners: Iberdrola/ScottishPower Renewables 50%, Masdar 50%. Operator: ScottishPower Renewables

resolved_value:
Developer: ScottishPower Renewables (Iberdrola). Current owners: Iberdrola/ScottishPower Renewables 50%, Masdar 50%. Operator: ScottishPower Renewables

citation_url:
https://www.iberdrola.com/documents/20125/5328031/250710-masdar-iberdrola-announce-5-2bn-uk-offshore-wind-deal-and-full-energization-of-476-MW-german-offshore-wind-farm.pdf

research_summary:
ScottishPower’s project page says the project is delivered as part of a 50/50 joint venture with Masdar. The freshest ownership confirmation found is 10/07/2025: Iberdrola and Masdar announced each would hold 50% with joint governance; Masdar’s 09/07/2025 financial close release confirms the same. Operator is not separately stated as a new JV operator; ScottishPower Renewables remains the project developer and public-facing operator.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.iberdrola.com/documents/20125/5328031/250710-masdar-iberdrola-announce-5-2bn-uk-offshore-wind-deal-and-full-energization-of-476-MW-german-offshore-wind-farm.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6703
canonical_id: 7ef23ae5-ad8a-4b13-9db8-280d4f43714d
wind_farm_name: East Anglia THREE
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://masdar.ae/en/news/newsroom/masdar-and-iberdrola-achieve-financial-close
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Masdar financial close release
source_of_record_url: https://masdar.ae/en/news/newsroom/masdar-and-iberdrola-achieve-financial-close
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Wholly owned by ScottishPower Renewables / Iberdrola during development; from 10/07/2025 owned 50/50 by Iberdrola and Masdar

research_value:
Wholly owned by ScottishPower Renewables / Iberdrola during development; from 10/07/2025 owned 50/50 by Iberdrola and Masdar

research_summary:
ScottishPower’s project page still says the project is “wholly owned by ScottishPower Renewables” in older project background text, but the same page also states it is being delivered as a 50/50 joint venture with Masdar. The freshest dated ownership evidence is 09/07/2025–10/07/2025, when Masdar and Iberdrola announced co-investment and 50/50 ownership; this supersedes older sole-owner background wording.


wind_farm_id: 6703
canonical_id: 7ef23ae5-ad8a-4b13-9db8-280d4f43714d
wind_farm_name: East Anglia THREE
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Under Construction
resolved_value: Under Construction
research_value: Under Construction
resolved_fact_id: 35154.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://masdar.ae/en/news/newsroom/first-turbine-installed-at-east-anglia-three
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Masdar first turbine release
source_of_record_url: https://masdar.ae/en/news/newsroom/first-turbine-installed-at-east-anglia-three
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Multiple current sources confirm active construction: ScottishPower says construction commenced in 07/2022; a 2025 government amendment document describes the design as 95 WTGs and 1,400 MW; April 2026 owner and contractor releases confirm the first turbine was installed. This clearly fits the exact Boundary Layer label Under Construction.


wind_farm_id: 6703
canonical_id: 7ef23ae5-ad8a-4b13-9db8-280d4f43714d
wind_farm_name: East Anglia THREE
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1400 MW
resolved_value: 1400 MW
research_value: 1400 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35155.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: UK government amendment document
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6895c649ad0cbc0e27643180/East_Anglia_Three_-_Request_for_Variation_4.pdf

research_summary:
Project-specific sources consistently describe East Anglia THREE as 1.4 GW / 1,400 MW after consent amendments. ScottishPower notes the 2019 non-material change increased overall capacity to 1,400 MW; 2025 government and owner sources still use 1,400 MW. This differs from the validation context’s 1,330 MW, and the web evidence supports 1,400 MW as the current project figure.

source_of_record_url:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6895c649ad0cbc0e27643180/East_Anglia_Three_-_Request_for_Variation_4.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6703
canonical_id: 7ef23ae5-ad8a-4b13-9db8-280d4f43714d
wind_farm_name: East Anglia THREE
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1400 MW
resolved_value: 1400 MW
research_value: 1400 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35156.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/east-anglia/east-anglia-three
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower Renewables project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/east-anglia/east-anglia-three
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Openly accessible project-specific ScottishPower material supports an export/transmission system aligned to 1,400 MW. The project page states the windfarm’s overall capacity was increased to 1,400 MW, and a current ScottishPower construction document states: “The onshore construction works associated with EA THREE will have a capacity of 1400MW and transmission connection of 1320MW.” I therefore retain 1,400 MW as the best-supported MEC field value in this report, while noting the openly accessible source language distinguishes project capacity from the onshore transmission connection figure.


wind_farm_id: 6703
canonical_id: 7ef23ae5-ad8a-4b13-9db8-280d4f43714d
wind_farm_name: East Anglia THREE
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: SG 14-236 DD
resolved_value: SG 14-236 DD
research_value: SG 14-236 DD
resolved_fact_id: 35157.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/press-releases/032923-siemens-gamesa-press-release-offshore-wind-power-plant-anglia-united-kingdom.html

research_summary:
Siemens Gamesa’s project-specific order announcement explicitly says East Anglia THREE will use 95 units of the SG 14-236 DD. Later owner press releases describe them as 14.7 MW turbines, which is consistent with a power-boosted configuration of the same platform, but the model itself is clearly SG 14-236 DD.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/press-releases/032923-siemens-gamesa-press-release-offshore-wind-power-plant-anglia-united-kingdom.html


wind_farm_id: 6703
canonical_id: 7ef23ae5-ad8a-4b13-9db8-280d4f43714d
wind_farm_name: East Anglia THREE
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens Gamesa
resolved_value: Siemens Gamesa
research_value: Siemens Gamesa
resolved_fact_id: 35158.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/global/en/home/press-releases/032923-siemens-gamesa-press-release-offshore-wind-power-plant-anglia-united-kingdom.html

research_summary:
Project-specific owner and OEM announcements confirm Siemens Gamesa as turbine supplier/OEM for East Anglia THREE.


wind_farm_id: 6703
canonical_id: 7ef23ae5-ad8a-4b13-9db8-280d4f43714d
wind_farm_name: East Anglia THREE
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 14.7 MW
resolved_value: 14.7 MW
research_value: 14.7 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35159.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Iberdrola turbine contract release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.iberdrola.com/press-room/news/detail/iberdrola-formalises-biggest-ever-contract-award-13billion-for-east-anglia-three-offshore-wind-farm

research_summary:
Project-specific owner releases in 2023 state East Anglia THREE will use 95 flagship 14.7 MW turbines. Siemens Gamesa’s project order release names the platform but does not state 14.7 MW in the snippet, so Iberdrola’s project-specific contract release is the clearest direct evidence; Amazon/Iberdrola’s East Anglia THREE PPA announcement also states 95 Siemens Gamesa 14.7 MW turbines.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.iberdrola.com/press-room/news/detail/iberdrola-formalises-biggest-ever-contract-award-13billion-for-east-anglia-three-offshore-wind-farm


wind_farm_id: 6703
canonical_id: 7ef23ae5-ad8a-4b13-9db8-280d4f43714d
wind_farm_name: East Anglia THREE
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 236 m
resolved_value: 236 m
research_value: 236 m
resolved_fact_id: 35160.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Siemens Gamesa’s project-specific order names the turbine as SG 14-236 DD, and later owner/construction releases refer to 115 m blades, which implies the same 236 m class platform; ScottishPower’s project page also says turbine rotor diameter is “from 230 m”. The most precise project-tied figure is 236 m from the named SG 14-236 DD platform used on this project.


wind_farm_id: 6703
canonical_id: 7ef23ae5-ad8a-4b13-9db8-280d4f43714d
wind_farm_name: East Anglia THREE
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/east-anglia/east-anglia-three
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: ScottishPower Renewables project page
source_of_record_url: https://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/offshore/east-anglia/east-anglia-three
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
ScottishPower’s project page confirms increased hub height was part of a consent change, but I did not find an authoritative project-specific accessible source stating the as-built East Anglia THREE hub height in metres. Per instruction, this remains Not confirmed rather than inferred from a generic SG 14-236 product page or another site.


wind_farm_id: 6703
canonical_id: 7ef23ae5-ad8a-4b13-9db8-280d4f43714d
wind_farm_name: East Anglia THREE
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 95
resolved_value: 95
research_value: 95
resolved_fact_id: 35161.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: UK government amendment document
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6895c649ad0cbc0e27643180/East_Anglia_Three_-_Request_for_Variation_4.pdf

research_summary:
Siemens Gamesa’s project order says 95 units will be supplied; the 2025 UK government amendment document states the design currently consists of 95 WTGs; recent owner releases also refer to 95 turbines. This aligns with the non-web validation signals provided (database winner 95; EMODnet hint 95).


wind_farm_id: 6703
canonical_id: 7ef23ae5-ad8a-4b13-9db8-280d4f43714d
wind_farm_name: East Anglia THREE
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile foundations for wind turbines; jacket foundation for offshore converter station
resolved_value: Monopile foundations for wind turbines; jacket foundation for offshore converter station
research_value: Monopile foundations for wind turbines; jacket foundation for offshore converter station
resolved_fact_id: 35162.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: UK government amendment document
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The April 2025 UK government variation document is project-specific and explicit: WTG foundation type is Monopile and OFCS foundation type is Jacket foundation. Recent reporting on offshore construction also refers to the first monopile installed in April 2025.


wind_farm_id: 6703
canonical_id: 7ef23ae5-ad8a-4b13-9db8-280d4f43714d
wind_farm_name: East Anglia THREE
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/03/2023
resolved_value: 01/03/2023
research_value: 01/03/2023
resolved_fact_id: 35164.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Siemens Gamesa press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
A distinct formal “FID” label was hard to source openly, but Siemens Gamesa announced a firm order on 29/03/2023, and Iberdrola announced the £1.3bn turbine contract on the same date, indicating committed project sanction by that point. I therefore use 01/03/2023 as a month-normalized FID proxy based on the March 2023 firm-order/major-contract milestone, with the month-level nature noted here.


wind_farm_id: 6703
canonical_id: 7ef23ae5-ad8a-4b13-9db8-280d4f43714d
wind_farm_name: East Anglia THREE
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/10/2026
resolved_value: 01/10/2026
research_value: 01/10/2026
resolved_fact_id: 35165.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Iberdrola and Masdar deal announcement PDF
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.iberdrola.com/documents/20125/5328031/250710-masdar-iberdrola-announce-5-2bn-uk-offshore-wind-deal-and-full-energization-of-476-MW-german-offshore-wind-farm.pdf

research_summary:
No source confirms first exported power yet. The freshest dated owner/partner sources say East Anglia THREE is expected to come into operation in Q4 2026 or initial operation in Q4 2026. Using the required normalization rule for quarter-level timing, I record this as 01/10/2026, but this is an expected date rather than a confirmed achieved first-power milestone.


wind_farm_id: 6703
canonical_id: 7ef23ae5-ad8a-4b13-9db8-280d4f43714d
wind_farm_name: East Anglia THREE
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/10/2026
resolved_value: 01/10/2026
research_value: 01/10/2026
resolved_fact_id: 35166.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://masdar.ae/en/news/newsroom/masdar-and-iberdrola-achieve-financial-close
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Masdar financial close release
source_of_record_url: https://masdar.ae/en/news/newsroom/masdar-and-iberdrola-achieve-financial-close
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No source confirms full commissioning has occurred yet. The freshest dated owner sources indicate the project is expected to come into operation / initial operation in Q4 2026. Using the normalization rule, I record 01/10/2026 as the expected full commissioning window start, with the caveat that the project is still under construction.


wind_farm_id: 6704
canonical_id: 609fb743-d916-4b58-873b-8537b73c8946
wind_farm_name: Rampion
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Rampion Offshore Wind Farm
research_value: Rampion Offshore Wind Farm
citation_url: https://www.rampionoffshore.com/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Rampion Offshore Wind Farm official website
source_of_record_url: https://www.rampionoffshore.com/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official project site uses Rampion Offshore Wind Farm; project company is Rampion Offshore Wind Limited. Historic development material also refers to the site awarded to E.ON in “Zone 6” off Sussex before the project name Rampion was adopted.


wind_farm_id: 6704
canonical_id: 609fb743-d916-4b58-873b-8537b73c8946
wind_farm_name: Rampion
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35167.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.rampionoffshore.com/wind-farm/owners/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Rampion owners page
source_of_record_url: https://www.rampionoffshore.com/wind-farm/owners/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developed by E.ON; current owners: RWE Renewables UK Limited (50.1%), Equitix (25.0%), Enbridge (24.9%); operator: RWE

resolved_value:
Developed by E.ON; current owners: RWE Renewables UK Limited (50.1%), Equitix (25.0%), Enbridge (24.9%); operator: RWE

research_summary:
Freshest owner split located on the project owners page crawled recently: RWE 50.1%, Enbridge 24.9%, Equitix 25%. The project site states E.ON UK developed the project through consent and managed construction. A newer dated project release published in 2025 for Rampion 2 also confirms the same JV percentages for the existing Rampion partnership; project news published in 2025/2024 confirms Rampion is RWE-operated.


wind_farm_id: 6704
canonical_id: 609fb743-d916-4b58-873b-8537b73c8946
wind_farm_name: Rampion
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE press release on Rampion ownership change
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
E.ON / Green Investment Bank / Enbridge at FID; RWE became majority owner in 2021; Macquarie-led consortium’s 25% stake is now shown on current project site as Equitix 25%

research_value:
E.ON / Green Investment Bank / Enbridge at FID; RWE became majority owner in 2021; Macquarie-led consortium’s 25% stake is now shown on current project site as Equitix 25%

citation_url:
https://www.rwe.com/en/press/rwe-ag/2021-03-12-offshore-wind-farm-rampion-acquisition-of-20-eon-stake-makes-rwe-majority-shareholder/

research_summary:
Ownership evolved from the original construction-era trio of E.ON, Green Investment Bank and Enbridge. RWE stated on 12/03/2021 that its share rose to 50.1% after taking an additional 20% from E.ON, with the remaining 49.9% held by a Macquarie-led consortium (25%) and Enbridge (24.9%). The freshest project owner page now names Equitix 25% rather than Macquarie-led consortium, indicating the current presentation of that quarter-shareholding. Freshest source date relied on for history: 04/04/2025 for JV continuity and 12/03/2021 for the transfer milestone.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.rwe.com/en/press/rwe-ag/2021-03-12-offshore-wind-farm-rampion-acquisition-of-20-eon-stake-makes-rwe-majority-shareholder/


wind_farm_id: 6704
canonical_id: 609fb743-d916-4b58-873b-8537b73c8946
wind_farm_name: Rampion
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 35168.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.rampionoffshore.com/about/construction/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Rampion construction page
source_of_record_url: https://www.rampionoffshore.com/about/construction/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project site states Rampion “is now generating” and construction page says it “is now fully operational.” Recent 2024/2025 project releases describe it as an operating wind farm. This aligns with the database context status.


wind_farm_id: 6704
canonical_id: 609fb743-d916-4b58-873b-8537b73c8946
wind_farm_name: Rampion
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 400 MW
resolved_value: 400 MW
research_value: 400 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35169.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.rampionoffshore.com/wind-farm/key-facts/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Rampion key facts
source_of_record_url: https://www.rampionoffshore.com/wind-farm/key-facts/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project key-facts page gives installed capacity as 400 MW. Ofgem tender material also lists Rampion installed capacity / TEC at 400 MW. Database context shows 400.2 MW; that appears to reflect the arithmetic sum of 116 × 3.45 MW rather than the rounded project gross capacity usually published on official pages.


wind_farm_id: 6704
canonical_id: 609fb743-d916-4b58-873b-8537b73c8946
wind_farm_name: Rampion
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 400 MW
resolved_value: 400 MW
research_value: 400 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35170.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/docs/2016/10/rampion_pim.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ofgem Rampion Preliminary Information Memorandum
source_of_record_url: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/docs/2016/10/rampion_pim.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public sector website terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Open Ofgem OFTO documentation is the clearest accessible source for export capability: the Rampion Preliminary Information Memorandum states Transmission Entry Capacity is 400MW and Capacity ratings (TEC) 400 MW. This is the best open proxy for MEC/export capacity.


wind_farm_id: 6704
canonical_id: 609fb743-d916-4b58-873b-8537b73c8946
wind_farm_name: Rampion
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas V112-3.45 MW Offshore
resolved_value: Vestas V112-3.45 MW Offshore
research_value: Vestas V112-3.45 MW Offshore
resolved_fact_id: 35171.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.rampionoffshore.com/about/offshore/turbines/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Rampion turbines page
source_of_record_url: https://www.rampionoffshore.com/about/offshore/turbines/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific pages explicitly tie Rampion to V112-3.45 MW turbines. This matches the linked EuroWindWakes fallback metadata, so no model inference from generic Vestas brochures was needed.


wind_farm_id: 6704
canonical_id: 609fb743-d916-4b58-873b-8537b73c8946
wind_farm_name: Rampion
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas
resolved_value: Vestas
research_value: Vestas
resolved_fact_id: 9136.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: MHI Vestas commissioning release
research_source_type: OEM press release
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Rampion pages describe the turbines as Vestas V112 3.45 MW; MHI Vestas’ 2018 commissioning release also confirms supply of 116 V112-3.45 MW turbines for Rampion.

research_source_url:
https://www.vestas.com/en/media/mwow-press-releases/2018/mhi-vestas-celebrates-commissioning-of-rampion-offshore-wind-far


wind_farm_id: 6704
canonical_id: 609fb743-d916-4b58-873b-8537b73c8946
wind_farm_name: Rampion
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 3.45
resolved_value: 3.45
research_value: 3.45 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9446.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Rampion key facts
research_source_type: official project website
research_source_url: https://www.rampionoffshore.com/wind-farm/key-facts/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project pages consistently state 116 turbines rated at 3.45 MW each. This matches the linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata and reconciles with the 400.2 MW arithmetic total.


wind_farm_id: 6704
canonical_id: 609fb743-d916-4b58-873b-8537b73c8946
wind_farm_name: Rampion
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 112
resolved_value: 112
research_value: 112 m
resolved_fact_id: 9601.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Rampion key facts
research_source_type: official project website
research_source_url: https://www.rampionoffshore.com/wind-farm/key-facts/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project key-facts page states blade diameter 112 m and the turbines page points to V112-3.45 MW. This matches the linked EuroWindWakes fallback value.


wind_farm_id: 6704
canonical_id: 609fb743-d916-4b58-873b-8537b73c8946
wind_farm_name: Rampion
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 80
resolved_value: 80
research_value: 80 m
resolved_fact_id: 9756.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Rampion key facts
research_source_type: official project website
research_source_url: https://www.rampionoffshore.com/wind-farm/key-facts/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
The strongest project-specific live webpage evidence is the project key-facts page: Turbine height to hub 80 m. A project PDF summary accessible on the same site mentions 84 m, creating a project-source conflict. Because the visible project key-facts page and the linked EuroWindWakes fallback both support 80 m, 80 m is the most defensible chosen value; conflict noted.


wind_farm_id: 6704
canonical_id: 609fb743-d916-4b58-873b-8537b73c8946
wind_farm_name: Rampion
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 116
resolved_value: 116
research_value: 116
resolved_fact_id: 47141.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 116 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Rampion key facts
research_source_type: official project website
research_source_url: https://www.rampionoffshore.com/wind-farm/key-facts/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Official project pages consistently state 116 turbines. This aligns with the non-web validation signals in the brief: database winner candidate 116, EuroWindWakes linked count 116, and EMODnet hint 116. No phase-scope mismatch was found for the built project.


wind_farm_id: 6704
canonical_id: 609fb743-d916-4b58-873b-8537b73c8946
wind_farm_name: Rampion
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile foundations
resolved_value: Monopile foundations
research_value: Monopile foundations
resolved_fact_id: 35177.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.rampionoffshore.com/about/offshore/foundations/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Rampion foundations page
source_of_record_url: https://www.rampionoffshore.com/about/offshore/foundations/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific foundations page states each turbine foundation comprises a monopile and transition piece; key-facts page says 116 monopile foundations.


wind_farm_id: 6704
canonical_id: 609fb743-d916-4b58-873b-8537b73c8946
wind_farm_name: Rampion
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 16/07/2014
resolved_value: 16/07/2014
research_value: 16/07/2014
resolved_fact_id: 35178.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.rampionoffshore.com/environment/consent/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Rampion consent page
source_of_record_url: https://www.rampionoffshore.com/environment/consent/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Rampion’s consent page states the Secretary of State made the Rampion Offshore Wind Farm Order on 16 July 2014. One Ofgem PIM extract appears to show 6 July 2014, but the project’s consent page is project-specific and more likely correct for the DCO order date; the older Ofgem document is treated as secondary on this point.


wind_farm_id: 6704
canonical_id: 609fb743-d916-4b58-873b-8537b73c8946
wind_farm_name: Rampion
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/05/2015
resolved_value: 01/05/2015
research_value: 01/05/2015
resolved_fact_id: 35179.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.rampionoffshore.com/app/uploads/2023/05/General-Rampion-Presentation.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Rampion general presentation PDF
source_of_record_url: https://www.rampionoffshore.com/app/uploads/2023/05/General-Rampion-Presentation.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project presentation on the official Rampion site gives May 2015: Final investment decision. GIG’s construction investment announcement in 2015 corroborates that the financing/construction commitment occurred in 2015, but does not pin the exact day; month-level date normalized to 01/05/2015 per instructions.


wind_farm_id: 6704
canonical_id: 609fb743-d916-4b58-873b-8537b73c8946
wind_farm_name: Rampion
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 26/11/2017
resolved_value: 26/11/2017
research_value: 26/11/2017
resolved_fact_id: 35180.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.rampionoffshore.com/about/history/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Rampion history page
source_of_record_url: https://www.rampionoffshore.com/about/history/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The official project history page gives 26 November 2017 and the dedicated project release is dated 27/11/2017 announcing first power that week. These are consistent enough to use 26/11/2017 as the milestone date.


wind_farm_id: 6704
canonical_id: 609fb743-d916-4b58-873b-8537b73c8946
wind_farm_name: Rampion
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2018-11-01
resolved_value: 2018-11-01
research_value: 01/04/2018
resolved_fact_id: 9911.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Rampion history page
research_source_type: official project website
research_source_url: https://www.rampionoffshore.com/about/history/
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Sources conflict slightly. Project history says April 2018 all 116 turbines were able to generate and deliver power; a later project release says all turbines were fully commissioned from April 2018; Vestas’ 30/11/2018 release celebrates completion/commissioning at inauguration. For the operational milestone, 01/04/2018 is the best normalized commissioning date for all turbines being online, with November 2018 being formal opening/celebratory confirmation rather than first full operational readiness.


wind_farm_id: 6705
canonical_id: c5b39d3c-4f1f-4198-b00c-ff6f0520db53
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 3
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Walney Extension West; also referred to as Walney Extension 3 / Walney 3 / WOW3
research_value: Walney Extension West; also referred to as Walney Extension 3 / Walney 3 / WOW3
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vestas order announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.vestas.com/en/media/company-news/2015/mhi-vestas-offshore-wind-has-received-a-330-mw-order-fo-c2963887

research_summary:
Phase ambiguity was resolved first: official and industry sources distinguish the full Walney Extension project (87 turbines, 659 MW) from its western phase supplied by MHI Vestas/Vestas. Vestas’ 2015 order explicitly names “Walney Extension West project” and states 330 MW / 40 turbines; contemporaneous project reporting and planning material refer to Walney 3 and 4 as the two extension phases.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.vestas.com/en/media/company-news/2015/mhi-vestas-offshore-wind-has-received-a-330-mw-order-fo-c2963887


wind_farm_id: 6705
canonical_id: c5b39d3c-4f1f-4198-b00c-ff6f0520db53
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 3
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35182.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://aipmanagement.dk/investments/walney-extension/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: AIP Walney Extension asset page
source_of_record_url: https://aipmanagement.dk/investments/walney-extension/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: DONG Energy / Ørsted. Current phase-level owner(s): Not confirmed separately from the full Walney Extension partnership. Operator: Ørsted (project-wide operator)

resolved_value:
Developer: DONG Energy / Ørsted. Current phase-level owner(s): Not confirmed separately from the full Walney Extension partnership. Operator: Ørsted (project-wide operator)

research_summary:
Freshest ownership evidence available is newer but only at whole-project level, not phase-specific. Ørsted portfolio information shows Walney Extension in operation and Ørsted as operator/50% partner; AIP’s current asset page shows the present whole-project split as Ørsted 50%, AIP 18.75%, PFA 18.75%, Octopus 12.5%. I did not infer a separate phase-level equity split because the sources do not explicitly break ownership down for Walney Extension West alone. Freshest source date relied on for current owners: AIP page crawled last week; for operator/status support: Ørsted portfolio page crawled 2 months ago.


wind_farm_id: 6705
canonical_id: c5b39d3c-4f1f-4198-b00c-ff6f0520db53
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 3
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2018/09/the-worlds-largest-offshore-wind-farm-opens-today
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted Walney Extension opening announcement
source_of_record_url: https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2018/09/the-worlds-largest-offshore-wind-farm-opens-today
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Originally 100% DONG Energy / Ørsted at project level; from 31/10/2017 sold down to Ørsted 50%, PFA 25%, PKA 25% at full-project level; from 2022 PKA/PFA joint holding sold 12.5% to Octopus; current full-project split shown by AIP as Ørsted 50%, AIP 18.75%, PFA 18.75%, Octopus 12.5%

research_value:
Originally 100% DONG Energy / Ørsted at project level; from 31/10/2017 sold down to Ørsted 50%, PFA 25%, PKA 25% at full-project level; from 2022 PKA/PFA joint holding sold 12.5% to Octopus; current full-project split shown by AIP as Ørsted 50%, AIP 18.75%, PFA 18.75%, Octopus 12.5%

research_summary:
Ownership history is well evidenced for the full Walney Extension project, not clearly for Walney Extension West alone. Ørsted’s 2018 announcement says the project is owned by Ørsted (50%), PKA (25%) and PFA (25%). AIP’s 2022 release says Octopus indirectly acquired 12.5%. AIP’s current asset page shows the present whole-project split as AIP 18.75%, PFA 18.75%, Octopus 12.5%, Ørsted 50%. I therefore state project-level history only and do not claim a phase-only split.


wind_farm_id: 6705
canonical_id: c5b39d3c-4f1f-4198-b00c-ff6f0520db53
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 3
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 35183.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://orsted.com/en/Our-business/Offshore-wind/Our-offshore-wind-farms
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted offshore wind farms portfolio
source_of_record_url: https://orsted.com/en/Our-business/Offshore-wind/Our-offshore-wind-farms
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The western phase is built and in service. Ørsted’s offshore wind farms portfolio lists Walney Extension with Status: In operation. Vestas also stated in September 2018 that the 40 turbines at Walney Extension West had been installed earlier that year. The closest exact Boundary Layer label is therefore Operational.


wind_farm_id: 6705
canonical_id: c5b39d3c-4f1f-4198-b00c-ff6f0520db53
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 3
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 330 MW
resolved_value: 330 MW
research_value: 330 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35184.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vestas order announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.vestas.com/en/media/company-news/2015/mhi-vestas-offshore-wind-has-received-a-330-mw-order-fo-c2963887

research_summary:
Vestas’ 2015 order is explicit that Walney Extension West is a 330 MW project with 40 turbines. This matches the provided database context and the turbine count × nominal rating framing for the west phase.


wind_farm_id: 6705
canonical_id: c5b39d3c-4f1f-4198-b00c-ff6f0520db53
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 3
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/walney-extension-offshore-wind-farm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK Walney Extension DCO page
source_of_record_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/walney-extension-offshore-wind-farm
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I found authoritative sources for gross installed capacity and consented max project capacity, but not an openly accessible, phase-specific MEC value for Walney Extension West. GOV.UK and planning documents give consented/project capacities for the broader extension, not a clear west-phase MEC. To avoid conflating gross installed capacity with export capacity, this remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6705
canonical_id: c5b39d3c-4f1f-4198-b00c-ff6f0520db53
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 3
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: V164-8.0 MW
resolved_value: V164-8.0 MW
research_value: V164-8.0 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35185.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Vestas order announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web evidence ties the west phase to the V164-8.0 MW platform: Vestas’ order names 40 V164-8.0 MW turbines for the Walney Extension West project. Because later commissioning communications often describe them as 8.25 MW turbines in service, I keep the model as V164-8.0 MW and treat 8.25 MW as the operational power mode/uprated output reference.


wind_farm_id: 6705
canonical_id: c5b39d3c-4f1f-4198-b00c-ff6f0520db53
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 3
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Vestas
resolved_value: Vestas
research_value: Vestas / MHI Vestas Offshore Wind
resolved_fact_id: 9137.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Vestas order announcement
research_source_type: OEM
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific sources explicitly tie Walney Extension West to MHI Vestas Offshore Wind; given the supplied validation context names OEM manufacturer as Vestas, and MHI Vestas was the offshore JV brand at the time, the most precise answer is Vestas / MHI Vestas Offshore Wind.


wind_farm_id: 6705
canonical_id: c5b39d3c-4f1f-4198-b00c-ff6f0520db53
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 3
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 8
resolved_value: 8
research_value: 8 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9447.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web evidence is slightly mixed: the 2015 order says V164-8.0 MW, while later commissioning releases describe 8.25 MW turbines in service. Because the user provided linked EuroWindWakes fallback row explicitly gives 8 MW and instructed that it must be used when project-specific web evidence is ambiguous, I use 8 MW here and note the later 8.25 MW operating-mode wording in the summary.


wind_farm_id: 6705
canonical_id: c5b39d3c-4f1f-4198-b00c-ff6f0520db53
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 3
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 164
resolved_value: 164
research_value: 164 m
resolved_fact_id: 9602.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web pages reviewed did not clearly state rotor diameter for Walney Extension West itself. Per the required fallback rule, I used the linked EuroWindWakes project turbine metadata value 164 m for this specific phase.


wind_farm_id: 6705
canonical_id: c5b39d3c-4f1f-4198-b00c-ff6f0520db53
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 3
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 111
resolved_value: 111
research_value: 111 m
resolved_fact_id: 9757.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific accessible web sources reviewed did not clearly give a Walney Extension West hub height. Under the mandatory fallback rule, I used the linked EuroWindWakes value 111 m and do not infer this from the turbine platform alone.


wind_farm_id: 6705
canonical_id: c5b39d3c-4f1f-4198-b00c-ff6f0520db53
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 3
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 40
resolved_value: 40
research_value: 40
resolved_fact_id: 47142.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 40 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Vestas order announcement
research_source_type: OEM
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Vestas’ order for Walney Extension West explicitly says 40 turbines. This aligns with the non-web validation signals supplied in the prompt: database winner candidate 40, EuroWindWakes linked turbine count 40, and EMODnet hint 40.


wind_farm_id: 6705
canonical_id: c5b39d3c-4f1f-4198-b00c-ff6f0520db53
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 3
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile
resolved_value: Monopile
research_value: Monopile
resolved_fact_id: 35191.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
research_summary: An accessible Ørsted investor presentation for Walney Extension lists **“Foundations
source_of_record_name: Ørsted June 2016 company presentation
source_of_record_licence: public PDF terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://cdn.orsted.com/-/media/www/docs/corp/com/investor/financial-reporting/financial-presentations/company_presentation_june_2016.pdf?hash=6D833580956D674E3A18D991A4EA7E15B5327958&la=en&rev=d5e6c1a360304181a78d5e30ffa02617

source_of_record_url:
https://cdn.orsted.com/-/media/www/docs/corp/com/investor/financial-reporting/financial-presentations/company_presentation_june_2016.pdf?hash=6D833580956D674E3A18D991A4EA7E15B5327958&la=en&rev=d5e6c1a360304181a78d5e30ffa02617


wind_farm_id: 6705
canonical_id: c5b39d3c-4f1f-4198-b00c-ff6f0520db53
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 3
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 07/11/2014
resolved_value: 07/11/2014
research_value: 07/11/2014
resolved_fact_id: 35192.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/walney-extension-offshore-wind-farm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK Walney Extension DCO page
source_of_record_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/walney-extension-offshore-wind-farm
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
GOV.UK’s DCO page clearly states the Secretary of State granted the Walney Extension offshore wind farm Development Consent Order on 7 November 2014. This is a project-wide consent for the extension phases including Walney 3.


wind_farm_id: 6705
canonical_id: c5b39d3c-4f1f-4198-b00c-ff6f0520db53
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 3
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/10/2015
resolved_value: 01/10/2015
research_value: 01/10/2015
resolved_fact_id: 35193.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://orsted.com/en/company-announcement-list/2015/10/1404754
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted company announcement
source_of_record_url: https://orsted.com/en/company-announcement-list/2015/10/1404754
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Ørsted’s 23/10/2015 announcement says DONG Energy decided to build Walney Extension; where only month/year-level FID timing is clearly evidenced in accessible sources, the normalization rule applies, so this is recorded as 01/10/2015. The west-phase turbine order was announced in December 2015 after that project decision.


wind_farm_id: 6705
canonical_id: c5b39d3c-4f1f-4198-b00c-ff6f0520db53
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 3
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/09/2017
resolved_value: 01/09/2017
research_value: 01/09/2017
resolved_fact_id: 35194.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted first power release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://orsted.com/en/media/newsroom/news/2017/09/first-power-at-walney-extension-offshore-wind-farm

research_summary:
Ørsted’s first-power release is from early September 2017 and states power was being exported after the first MHI Vestas turbine was installed. The linked EuroWindWakes row gives commissioning date 01/09/2018, but that is better interpreted as project COD timing rather than first power. For first power, the authoritative project press release supports September 2017, normalized to 01/09/2017 because day-of-month is not explicit in the accessible text excerpt.

source_of_record_url:
https://orsted.com/en/media/newsroom/news/2017/09/first-power-at-walney-extension-offshore-wind-farm


wind_farm_id: 6705
canonical_id: c5b39d3c-4f1f-4198-b00c-ff6f0520db53
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 3
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2018-09-01
resolved_value: 2018-09-01
research_value: 01/09/2018
resolved_fact_id: 9912.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
For Walney Extension West specifically, Vestas’ September 2018 inauguration release says “In Phase 1 (Walney Extension West) earlier this year, MHI Vestas installed 40 of its V164-8.25 MW turbines”. The linked EuroWindWakes row gives commissioning date 01/09/2018, and project-specific web evidence around the west phase points to 2018 completion. I therefore use 01/09/2018 as the normalized full-commissioning date for Walney Extension 3.


wind_farm_id: 6706
canonical_id: 8b23d48d-4c8f-4cf7-b7a8-2dbb8275dc25
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 4
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Walney Extension 4
research_value: Walney Extension 4
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Planning Inspectorate wake assessment
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010121-000902-DL3%20Updated%20Wake%20Assessment%20for%20the%20%C3%98rsted%20IPs.pdf

research_summary:
Phase/name ambiguity resolved as the Siemens Gamesa 7 MW part of Walney Extension. Recent planning-examination wake studies explicitly list “Walney Extension 4” as a distinct operational offshore wind farm / sub-phase at 329 MW with 47 turbines, while owner/project pages for the overall scheme describe Walney Extension as the combined 87-turbine project.

source_of_record_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010121-000902-DL3%20Updated%20Wake%20Assessment%20for%20the%20%C3%98rsted%20IPs.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6706
canonical_id: 8b23d48d-4c8f-4cf7-b7a8-2dbb8275dc25
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 4
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35196.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://aipmanagement.dk/investments/walney-extension/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: AIP Walney Extension investment page
source_of_record_url: https://aipmanagement.dk/investments/walney-extension/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: DONG Energy / Ørsted; Current owners of Walney Extension partnership: Ørsted 50.00%, AIP 18.75%, PFA 18.75%, Octopus Energy Generation 12.50%; Operator: Ørsted / Walney Extension Ltd

resolved_value:
Developer: DONG Energy / Ørsted; Current owners of Walney Extension partnership: Ørsted 50.00%, AIP 18.75%, PFA 18.75%, Octopus Energy Generation 12.50%; Operator: Ørsted / Walney Extension Ltd

research_summary:
Freshest ownership evidence relied on is the AIP investment page crawled 2026 and current AIP ownership split showing AIP 18.75%, PFA 18.75%, Octopus 12.5%, Ørsted 50%. Historic project development was by DONG Energy, now Ørsted. Operator wording is supported by the 2020 transmission-sale announcement describing Walney Extension Ltd as operator; operational management is from Ørsted’s UK west coast hub.


wind_farm_id: 6706
canonical_id: 8b23d48d-4c8f-4cf7-b7a8-2dbb8275dc25
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 4
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted green bonds investor letter 2017
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
07/11/2014 consented under DONG Energy Walney Extension (UK) Ltd; by Nov 2017 Ørsted sold 50% of Walney Extension to PFA and PKA (25% each); by 08/11/2023 PKA/PFA had divested 12.5% to Octopus and AIP now shows current split Ørsted 50.00%, AIP 18.75%, PFA 18.75%, Octopus 12.50%

research_value:
07/11/2014 consented under DONG Energy Walney Extension (UK) Ltd; by Nov 2017 Ørsted sold 50% of Walney Extension to PFA and PKA (25% each); by 08/11/2023 PKA/PFA had divested 12.5% to Octopus and AIP now shows current split Ørsted 50.00%, AIP 18.75%, PFA 18.75%, Octopus 12.50%

citation_url:
https://cdn.orsted.com/-/media/www/docs/corp/com/sustainability/orsted_green_bonds_investor_letter_2017.pdf?hash=702D2A2064EF9A46975E475C6E640EA7CAD352D9&la=en&rev=b47adfa91fb5426f93634dd6d902b8cc

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on is AIP current asset page for the present split. Ownership history is reconstructed from official/owner materials: GOV.UK/MMO shows original DONG Energy project company; Ørsted’s 2017 investor letter confirms the initial 50/25/25 structure; AIP’s 08/11/2023 release confirms Octopus indirectly acquired 12.5% from PKA/PFA, leading to the current split shown on AIP’s asset page.

source_of_record_url:
https://cdn.orsted.com/-/media/www/docs/corp/com/sustainability/orsted_green_bonds_investor_letter_2017.pdf?hash=702D2A2064EF9A46975E475C6E640EA7CAD352D9&la=en&rev=b47adfa91fb5426f93634dd6d902b8cc


wind_farm_id: 6706
canonical_id: 8b23d48d-4c8f-4cf7-b7a8-2dbb8275dc25
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 4
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 35197.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Planning Inspectorate wake assessment
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010121-000902-DL3%20Updated%20Wake%20Assessment%20for%20the%20%C3%98rsted%20IPs.pdf

research_summary:
Walney Extension 4 is treated as operational because recent planning-examination documents classify “Walney Extension 4” as Operational, and the parent Walney Extension project was opened in September 2018. This matches the provided database validation context.


wind_farm_id: 6706
canonical_id: 8b23d48d-4c8f-4cf7-b7a8-2dbb8275dc25
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 4
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 329 MW
resolved_value: 329 MW
research_value: 329 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35198.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ofgem Walney Extension ex-post cost review
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/docs/2020/06/redacted_grant_thornton_report_on_the_ex-post_cost_review_of_walney_dated_19_may_2020.pdf

research_summary:
For the sub-phase specifically, Ofgem’s ex-post review states WOW04 utilises 47 7.0 MW WTGs with an installed capacity of 329 MW; recent planning material also lists Walney Extension 4 – 329 MW. This is the correct figure for Walney Extension 4, distinct from the full Walney Extension project’s 659/660 MW.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/docs/2020/06/redacted_grant_thornton_report_on_the_ex-post_cost_review_of_walney_dated_19_may_2020.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6706
canonical_id: 8b23d48d-4c8f-4cf7-b7a8-2dbb8275dc25
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 4
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 324 MW
resolved_value: 324 MW
research_value: 324 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35199.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ofgem Walney Extension ex-post cost review
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/docs/2020/06/redacted_grant_thornton_report_on_the_ex-post_cost_review_of_walney_dated_19_may_2020.pdf

research_summary:
Ofgem’s ex-post review gives the clearest project-specific distinction between installed capacity and offshore-boundary/export figure: WOW04 ... installed capacity of 329 MW and 324 MW at the Offshore Boundary Point. A second corroborating public source specifically lists Walney Extension 4 at 329 MW but does not state MEC; therefore one authoritative source is used for MEC.


wind_farm_id: 6706
canonical_id: 8b23d48d-4c8f-4cf7-b7a8-2dbb8275dc25
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 4
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: SWT-7.0-154
resolved_value: SWT-7.0-154
research_value: SWT-7.0-154
resolved_fact_id: 35200.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources are slightly inconsistent on nomenclature, with recent planning material using SG-7.0-154 while legacy project material refers to SWT-7.0-154 / Siemens Gamesa 7 MW. Because the linked EuroWindWakes row explicitly provides SWT-7.0-154 for Walney Extension 4, that dataset value is used as the required fallback label for this field.


wind_farm_id: 6706
canonical_id: 8b23d48d-4c8f-4cf7-b7a8-2dbb8275dc25
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 4
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens Gamesa
resolved_value: Siemens Gamesa
research_value: Siemens Gamesa
resolved_fact_id: 9138.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Planning Inspectorate wake assessment
research_source_type: regulator/planning document
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Recent planning material for Walney Extension 4 explicitly states Manufacturer Siemens Gamesa. This aligns with EuroWindWakes linked turbine metadata and the project’s owner page referring to 47 Siemens Gamesa 7 MW turbines.


wind_farm_id: 6706
canonical_id: 8b23d48d-4c8f-4cf7-b7a8-2dbb8275dc25
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 4
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 7
resolved_value: 7
research_value: 7 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9448.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Ofgem Walney Extension ex-post cost review
research_source_type: regulator report
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Multiple project-specific sources agree Walney Extension 4 comprises 47 x 7.0 MW Siemens Gamesa turbines. This aligns with the linked EuroWindWakes fallback row.


wind_farm_id: 6706
canonical_id: 8b23d48d-4c8f-4cf7-b7a8-2dbb8275dc25
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 4
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 154
resolved_value: 154
research_value: 154 m
resolved_fact_id: 9603.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Planning Inspectorate wake assessment
research_source_type: regulator/planning document
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Recent planning material explicitly gives Diameter 154 m for the Walney Extension 4 Siemens Gamesa turbine. This matches the linked EuroWindWakes row.


wind_farm_id: 6706
canonical_id: 8b23d48d-4c8f-4cf7-b7a8-2dbb8275dc25
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 4
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 111
resolved_value: 111
research_value: 111 m
resolved_fact_id: 9758.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web evidence is conflicting: a recent planning report gives 106.7 mMSL, which is not necessarily the same measurement basis as hub height above LAT/sea level used elsewhere. Because project-specific web evidence remained ambiguous and the linked EuroWindWakes dataset explicitly provides 111 m, the EuroWindWakes value is used as the required fallback.


wind_farm_id: 6706
canonical_id: 8b23d48d-4c8f-4cf7-b7a8-2dbb8275dc25
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 4
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 47
resolved_value: 47
research_value: 47
resolved_fact_id: 47143.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 47 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Ofgem Walney Extension ex-post cost review
research_source_type: regulator report
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Ofgem and recent planning material both state Walney Extension 4 has 47 turbines. This aligns with the non-web validation signals provided in context: current database candidate 47, EuroWindWakes linked-turbine count 47, and EMODnet hint 47.


wind_farm_id: 6706
canonical_id: 8b23d48d-4c8f-4cf7-b7a8-2dbb8275dc25
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 4
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile foundations
resolved_value: Monopile foundations
research_value: Monopile foundations
resolved_fact_id: 35206.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK Walney Extension DML variation letter
source_of_record_licence: Open Government/public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7f604ded915d74e622a157/Walney_extension_letter_demed_marine_licence_variation_March_2015.pdf

research_summary:
Official consent-variation materials explicitly refer to “installation of monopile foundations” for Walney Extension generation assets, and DONG Energy’s 2016 company presentation lists Walney Extension **Foundations \

source_of_record_url:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7f604ded915d74e622a157/Walney_extension_letter_demed_marine_licence_variation_March_2015.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6706
canonical_id: 8b23d48d-4c8f-4cf7-b7a8-2dbb8275dc25
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 4
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 07/11/2014
resolved_value: 07/11/2014
research_value: 07/11/2014
resolved_fact_id: 35207.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/walney-extension-offshore-wind-farm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK Walney Extension DCO page
source_of_record_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/walney-extension-offshore-wind-farm
source_of_record_licence: Open Government/public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
GOV.UK/MMO states that on 7 November 2014 the Secretary of State granted the DCO for Walney Extension offshore wind farm. This is the consent milestone relevant to Walney Extension 4 as part of the consented parent project.


wind_farm_id: 6706
canonical_id: 8b23d48d-4c8f-4cf7-b7a8-2dbb8275dc25
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 4
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/10/2015
resolved_value: 01/10/2015
research_value: 01/10/2015
resolved_fact_id: 35208.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted green bonds investor letter 2017
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://cdn.orsted.com/-/media/www/docs/corp/com/sustainability/orsted_green_bonds_investor_letter_2017.pdf?hash=702D2A2064EF9A46975E475C6E640EA7CAD352D9&la=en&rev=b47adfa91fb5426f93634dd6d902b8cc

research_summary:
Ørsted states it “has today decided to construct” Walney Extension on 28/10/2015, and its investor letter separately states “Ørsted took the final investment decision on Walney Extension in October 2015.” Month-level evidence is therefore normalized to 01/10/2015.


wind_farm_id: 6706
canonical_id: 8b23d48d-4c8f-4cf7-b7a8-2dbb8275dc25
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 4
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 04/09/2017
resolved_value: 04/09/2017
research_value: 04/09/2017
resolved_fact_id: 35209.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted first power announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://orsted.com/en/media/newsroom/news/2017/09/first-power-at-walney-extension-offshore-wind-farm

research_summary:
Ørsted announced first power at Walney Extension on 04/09/2017. That milestone was for the parent project, and the Siemens 7 MW tranche followed later in installation sequence; no separate first-power date for Walney Extension 4 alone was found in accessible authoritative sources.


wind_farm_id: 6706
canonical_id: 8b23d48d-4c8f-4cf7-b7a8-2dbb8275dc25
wind_farm_name: Walney Extension 4
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2018-09-01
resolved_value: 2018-09-01
research_value: 06/09/2018
resolved_fact_id: 9913.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Ørsted opening announcement
research_source_type: developer press release
research_source_url: https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2018/09/the-worlds-largest-offshore-wind-farm-opens-today
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
Full-project commissioning/opening is publicly evidenced on 06/09/2018 when Ørsted announced the world’s largest offshore wind farm had opened; NKT also reported successful commissioning of the cable system on 04/09/2018. For Walney Extension 4 as a built sub-phase, this is the best-supported operational completion date.


wind_farm_id: 6708
canonical_id: 040ac394-188f-45c6-9ee8-2713d628634a
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank C
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Dogger Bank C; formerly Dogger Bank Teesside A
research_value: Dogger Bank C; formerly Dogger Bank Teesside A
citation_url: https://doggerbank.com/dogger-bank-c-non-material-change-application/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank C non-material change page
source_of_record_url: https://doggerbank.com/dogger-bank-c-non-material-change-application/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official project sources explicitly identify Dogger Bank C as the third phase of Dogger Bank Wind Farm and note the historic consented name Dogger Bank Teesside A.


wind_farm_id: 6708
canonical_id: 040ac394-188f-45c6-9ee8-2713d628634a
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank C
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35260.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SSE Renewables Dogger Bank C substation platform update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Dogger Bank Wind Farm joint venture led in development/construction by SSE Renewables; current owners: SSE Renewables 40%, Equinor 40%, Vårgrønn 20%; operator: SSE Renewables during development/construction, Equinor on completion/operations

resolved_value:
Developer: Dogger Bank Wind Farm joint venture led in development/construction by SSE Renewables; current owners: SSE Renewables 40%, Equinor 40%, Vårgrønn 20%; operator: SSE Renewables during development/construction, Equinor on completion/operations

citation_url:
https://www.sserenewables.com/news-and-views/2025/05/dogger-bank-wind-farm-and-delivery-partners-complete-installation-of-hvdc-offshore-substation-platform-at-dogger-bank-c/

research_summary:
Freshest authoritative source relied on is SSE Renewables dated 23/05/2025, which states the JV is SSE Renewables (40%), Equinor (40%) and Vårgrønn (20%), with SSE leading development/construction and Equinor operating on completion. The 2024 safety-zone application independently repeats the same 40:40:20 split.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.sserenewables.com/news-and-views/2025/05/dogger-bank-wind-farm-and-delivery-partners-complete-installation-of-hvdc-offshore-substation-platform-at-dogger-bank-c/


wind_farm_id: 6708
canonical_id: 040ac394-188f-45c6-9ee8-2713d628634a
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank C
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Planning Inspectorate Dogger Bank Teesside A NMC appendix
source_of_record_licence: public sector information
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Originally developed within the Forewind consortium as Dogger Bank Teesside A; post-DCO the project moved into an SSE–Equinor JV and is now held by SSE Renewables 40%, Equinor 40%, Vårgrønn 20%

research_value:
Originally developed within the Forewind consortium as Dogger Bank Teesside A; post-DCO the project moved into an SSE–Equinor JV and is now held by SSE Renewables 40%, Equinor 40%, Vårgrønn 20%

citation_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010051/EN010051-002391-DB%20Teesside%20A_%20Appendix%201%20Ornithology%20Technical%20Report.pdf

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on for current ownership is 23/05/2025 from SSE Renewables. For history, Planning Inspectorate material says the project was originally developed by Forewind and that an SSE/Equinor JV was set up after consent; the 2024 safety-zone application confirms the current 40:40:20 ownership. Older 2021 Dogger Bank C financial-close pages referencing an Eni sell-down appear superseded by newer official JV sources and are not used for the current ownership answer.

source_of_record_url:
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010051/EN010051-002391-DB%20Teesside%20A_%20Appendix%201%20Ornithology%20Technical%20Report.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6708
canonical_id: 040ac394-188f-45c6-9ee8-2713d628634a
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank C
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Under Construction
resolved_value: Under Construction
research_value: Under Construction
resolved_fact_id: 35261.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SSE Renewables Dogger Bank C substation platform update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.sserenewables.com/news-and-views/2025/05/dogger-bank-wind-farm-and-delivery-partners-complete-installation-of-hvdc-offshore-substation-platform-at-dogger-bank-c/

research_summary:
Newer dated authoritative sources outweigh older schedule pages: the 23/05/2025 SSE update says Dogger Bank C’s offshore substation platform has been installed and further commissioning activities will follow, while the 2024 safety-zone application schedules offshore construction through 2027 and turbine installation from Q1 2026. Closest exact Boundary Layer label: Under Construction.


wind_farm_id: 6708
canonical_id: 040ac394-188f-45c6-9ee8-2713d628634a
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank C
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1200 MW
resolved_value: 1200 MW
research_value: 1200 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35263.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank C platform press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://doggerbank.com/press-releases/dogger-bank-wind-farm-and-delivery-partners-complete-installation-of-hvdc-offshore-substation-platform-at-dogger-bank-c/

research_summary:
Project-specific sources say each Dogger Bank phase/offshore platform receives 1.2 GW of AC power for conversion and export. Used as the best open proxy for MEC; no clearer project-specific open source was found stating a distinct lower export limit for Dogger Bank C.

source_of_record_url:
https://doggerbank.com/press-releases/dogger-bank-wind-farm-and-delivery-partners-complete-installation-of-hvdc-offshore-substation-platform-at-dogger-bank-c/


wind_farm_id: 6708
canonical_id: 040ac394-188f-45c6-9ee8-2713d628634a
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank C
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35264.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://doggerbank.com/press-releases/ges-haliade-x-14mw-turbine-to-debut-at-dogger-bank-c/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank GE Haliade-X 14MW turbine announcement
source_of_record_url: https://doggerbank.com/press-releases/ges-haliade-x-14mw-turbine-to-debut-at-dogger-bank-c/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
GE Haliade-X for Dogger Bank C; originally announced as 14 MW, with 2024 project filing showing a 14.7 MW site configuration

resolved_value:
GE Haliade-X for Dogger Bank C; originally announced as 14 MW, with 2024 project filing showing a 14.7 MW site configuration

research_summary:
An openly accessible official Dogger Bank press release states Dogger Bank C will use GE’s upscaled Haliade-X 14 MW turbine, and the newer 2024 project-specific safety-zone application lists a Dogger Bank C WTG capacity of 14.7 MW, indicating the site-specific configured rating used in construction documentation is above the original 14 MW announcement.


wind_farm_id: 6708
canonical_id: 040ac394-188f-45c6-9ee8-2713d628634a
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank C
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: GE Vernova (formerly GE Renewable Energy / General Electric)
resolved_value: GE Vernova (formerly GE Renewable Energy / General Electric)
research_value: GE Vernova (formerly GE Renewable Energy / General Electric)
resolved_fact_id: 35265.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank C safety zone application
source_of_record_licence: public document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66faadb2e84ae1fd8592eb6c/dogger-bank-c-safety-zone-application.pdf

research_summary:
Dogger Bank C project-specific documents identify the manufacturer as GE/General Electric; current corporate branding is GE Vernova.

source_of_record_url:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66faadb2e84ae1fd8592eb6c/dogger-bank-c-safety-zone-application.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6708
canonical_id: 040ac394-188f-45c6-9ee8-2713d628634a
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank C
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 14.7 MW
resolved_value: 14.7 MW
research_value: 14.7 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35266.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank C safety zone application
source_of_record_licence: public document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66faadb2e84ae1fd8592eb6c/dogger-bank-c-safety-zone-application.pdf

research_summary:
The most project-specific and latest accessible technical source found is the 2024 safety-zone application, which lists “Capacity 14.7 Mega Watts (MW)” for Dogger Bank C WTGs. Earlier 2020–2021 announcements described the phase as Haliade-X 14 MW; the newer project-specific technical filing is treated as the stronger current construction value.


wind_farm_id: 6708
canonical_id: 040ac394-188f-45c6-9ee8-2713d628634a
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank C
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 220 m
resolved_value: 220 m
research_value: 220 m
resolved_fact_id: 35267.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank C safety zone application
source_of_record_licence: public document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Confirmed by the 2024 project-specific safety-zone application; this aligns with the Teesside A NMC work that raised allowable rotor diameter for the consented project.


wind_farm_id: 6708
canonical_id: 040ac394-188f-45c6-9ee8-2713d628634a
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank C
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 138 m above LAT
resolved_value: 138 m above LAT
research_value: 138 m above LAT
resolved_fact_id: 35268.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank C safety zone application
source_of_record_licence: public document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Confirmed directly in the 2024 project-specific safety-zone application as the Dogger Bank C WTG hub height. No linked EuroWindWakes turbine fallback was provided in the prompt, so project-specific web evidence is used.


wind_farm_id: 6708
canonical_id: 040ac394-188f-45c6-9ee8-2713d628634a
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank C
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 87
resolved_value: 87
research_value: 87
resolved_fact_id: 35269.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank C safety zone application
source_of_record_licence: public document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The best project-specific web sources consistently show 87 turbines for Dogger Bank C, not 100. This differs from the provided non-web validation hint of 100 and likely reflects older boundary-level or enrichment values rather than the current project layout.


wind_farm_id: 6708
canonical_id: 040ac394-188f-45c6-9ee8-2713d628634a
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank C
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile foundations for turbines; offshore substation on jacket foundation
resolved_value: Monopile foundations for turbines; offshore substation on jacket foundation
research_value: Monopile foundations for turbines; offshore substation on jacket foundation
resolved_fact_id: 35270.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank C safety zone application
source_of_record_licence: public document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific sources state Dogger Bank C turbines are installed on monopile foundations; the offshore substation platform is on a jacket fixed via four pin piles.


wind_farm_id: 6708
canonical_id: 040ac394-188f-45c6-9ee8-2713d628634a
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank C
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 17/02/2015
resolved_value: 17/02/2015
research_value: 17/02/2015
resolved_fact_id: 35271.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank DCO library page
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://doggerbank.com/pdf-library/development-consent-order-as-made-by-the-secretary-of-state-for-energy-and-climate-change/

research_summary:
The underlying DCO was made on 17 February 2015 for Dogger Bank Teesside A and B; Dogger Bank C is the renamed Teesside A phase.

source_of_record_url:
https://doggerbank.com/pdf-library/development-consent-order-as-made-by-the-secretary-of-state-for-energy-and-climate-change/


wind_farm_id: 6708
canonical_id: 040ac394-188f-45c6-9ee8-2713d628634a
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank C
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/11/2021
resolved_value: 01/11/2021
research_value: 01/11/2021
resolved_fact_id: 35272.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://doggerbank.com/construction/dogger-bank-c-reaches-financial-close/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank C reaches financial close
source_of_record_url: https://doggerbank.com/construction/dogger-bank-c-reaches-financial-close/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The clearest open project-specific milestone found is Dogger Bank C reaching financial close in November 2021; month-level wording is normalized to 01/11/2021 per instructions and used as the effective FID milestone.


wind_farm_id: 6708
canonical_id: 040ac394-188f-45c6-9ee8-2713d628634a
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank C
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank C safety zone application
source_of_record_licence: public document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Not yet achieved. Older 2021 financing guidance pointed to Q3 2025 first power, but the newer 2024 safety-zone application schedules WTGs from Q1 2026 to Q2 2027 and does not confirm an achieved or final first-power date for Dogger Bank C.


wind_farm_id: 6708
canonical_id: 040ac394-188f-45c6-9ee8-2713d628634a
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank C
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/04/2027
resolved_value: 01/04/2027
research_value: 01/04/2027
resolved_fact_id: 35273.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank C safety zone application
source_of_record_licence: public document terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Not yet achieved. The newer 2024 safety-zone application expects completion/final commissioning between Q2 2026 and Q2 2027, while SSE’s 23/05/2025 update says the full 3.6 GW wind farm will be completed in 2027. Normalized here to 01/04/2027 as a Q2 2027 expected date, not an achieved COD.


wind_farm_id: 6709
canonical_id: a3f24e57-0991-467d-bc89-d99ad9491e06
wind_farm_name: Sofia
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Sofia Offshore Wind Farm
research_value: Sofia Offshore Wind Farm
citation_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dogger-bank-teesside-a-and-b-offshore-wind-farm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK Dogger Bank Teesside A and B Offshore Wind Farm page
source_of_record_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dogger-bank-teesside-a-and-b-offshore-wind-farm
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official project identity is Sofia Offshore Wind Farm; historic name was Dogger Bank Teesside B. UK government consent records explicitly say Teesside B was renamed Sofia after the 2017 project split.


wind_farm_id: 6709
canonical_id: a3f24e57-0991-467d-bc89-d99ad9491e06
wind_farm_name: Sofia
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Developer: RWE (via Sofia Offshore Wind Farm Limited). Current owner: RWE 100%. Operator: RWE
resolved_value: Developer: RWE (via Sofia Offshore Wind Farm Limited). Current owner: RWE 100%. Operator: RWE
research_value: Developer: RWE (via Sofia Offshore Wind Farm Limited). Current owner: RWE 100%. Operator: RWE
resolved_fact_id: 35274.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://sofiawindfarm.com/about/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Sofia Offshore Wind Farm about page
source_of_record_url: https://sofiawindfarm.com/about/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Freshest dated authoritative ownership/status source found was RWE press release dated 15/07/2025, which describes Sofia as RWE’s project under construction. The project website states Sofia is “currently 100% owned by RWE.” No newer official source found showing any completed equity sell-down, so ownership is treated as RWE 100% and operator RWE.


wind_farm_id: 6709
canonical_id: a3f24e57-0991-467d-bc89-d99ad9491e06
wind_farm_name: Sofia
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://sofiawindfarm.com/about/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Sofia Offshore Wind Farm about page
source_of_record_url: https://sofiawindfarm.com/about/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Forewind JV development origin; August 2017 split gave Dogger Bank Teesside B to RWE/Innogy; renamed Sofia in December 2017; current ownership remains RWE 100%

research_value:
Forewind JV development origin; August 2017 split gave Dogger Bank Teesside B to RWE/Innogy; renamed Sofia in December 2017; current ownership remains RWE 100%

research_summary:
Freshest dated source relied on for current position is RWE 15/07/2025; historic ownership transition is explained on the Sofia about page and corroborated by GOV.UK consent history. The 2017 split separated Teesside B from the other Dogger Bank projects, after which it became Sofia under RWE control.


wind_farm_id: 6709
canonical_id: a3f24e57-0991-467d-bc89-d99ad9491e06
wind_farm_name: Sofia
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Under Construction
resolved_value: Under Construction
research_value: Under Construction
resolved_fact_id: 35275.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE foundations milestone press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.rwe.com/en/press/rwe-offshore-wind-gmbh/2025-07-15-sofia-offshore-wind-farm-completes-installation-of-foundations/

research_summary:
Newer dated authoritative sources are clear that offshore foundations and turbine installation are underway. RWE said on 17/03/2025 that Sofia was on track for first power in 2025, and on 15/07/2025 confirmed the 100th monopile had been installed. This fits the Boundary Layer label Under Construction.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.rwe.com/en/press/rwe-offshore-wind-gmbh/2025-07-15-sofia-offshore-wind-farm-completes-installation-of-foundations/


wind_farm_id: 6709
canonical_id: a3f24e57-0991-467d-bc89-d99ad9491e06
wind_farm_name: Sofia
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1,400 MW
resolved_value: 1,400 MW
research_value: 1,400 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35277.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://sofiawindfarm.com/offshore-construction/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Sofia offshore construction page
source_of_record_url: https://sofiawindfarm.com/offshore-construction/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Sofia’s own offshore construction page says GE’s HVDC converter stations are capable of transmitting 1,400 megawatts at 320 kV. No open authoritative source was found showing a different lower contractual MEC, so the best-supported accessible value is 1,400 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6709
canonical_id: a3f24e57-0991-467d-bc89-d99ad9491e06
wind_farm_name: Sofia
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 222 m
resolved_value: 222 m
research_value: 222 m
resolved_fact_id: 35281.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://sofiawindfarm.com/project/components/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Sofia components page
source_of_record_url: https://sofiawindfarm.com/project/components/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific Sofia and RWE sources explicitly state a 222 m rotor diameter for Sofia’s turbines.


wind_farm_id: 6709
canonical_id: a3f24e57-0991-467d-bc89-d99ad9491e06
wind_farm_name: Sofia
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://sofiawindfarm.com/project/components/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Sofia components page
source_of_record_url: https://sofiawindfarm.com/project/components/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources confirm turbine tip height (252 m above sea level) and blade length (108 m), but I did not find a project-specific authoritative source explicitly stating Sofia’s hub height. Per instruction, this is left Not confirmed rather than inferred from generic SG 14-222 DD product material.


wind_farm_id: 6709
canonical_id: a3f24e57-0991-467d-bc89-d99ad9491e06
wind_farm_name: Sofia
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 100
resolved_value: 100
research_value: 100
resolved_fact_id: 35282.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE foundations milestone press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.rwe.com/en/press/rwe-offshore-wind-gmbh/2025-07-15-sofia-offshore-wind-farm-completes-installation-of-foundations/

research_summary:
Official project, RWE and Siemens Gamesa sources all state 100 turbines. This aligns with the non-web validation signals provided in the brief, which also pointed to 100.


wind_farm_id: 6709
canonical_id: a3f24e57-0991-467d-bc89-d99ad9491e06
wind_farm_name: Sofia
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Extended monopile foundations
resolved_value: Extended monopile foundations
research_value: Extended monopile foundations
resolved_fact_id: 35283.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE foundations milestone press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific official sources say Sofia uses extended monopile foundations, without separate transition pieces.


wind_farm_id: 6709
canonical_id: a3f24e57-0991-467d-bc89-d99ad9491e06
wind_farm_name: Sofia
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 04/08/2015
resolved_value: 04/08/2015
research_value: 04/08/2015
resolved_fact_id: 35284.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dogger-bank-teesside-a-and-b-offshore-wind-farm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK Dogger Bank Teesside A and B Offshore Wind Farm page
source_of_record_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dogger-bank-teesside-a-and-b-offshore-wind-farm
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
GOV.UK states the Dogger Bank Teesside A and B Offshore Wind Farm Order 2015 was granted on 4 August 2015; Sofia inherited the Teesside B consent.


wind_farm_id: 6709
canonical_id: a3f24e57-0991-467d-bc89-d99ad9491e06
wind_farm_name: Sofia
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/11/2025
resolved_value: 01/11/2025
research_value: 01/11/2025
resolved_fact_id: 35286.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://sofiawindfarm.com/offshore-construction/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Sofia offshore construction page
source_of_record_url: https://sofiawindfarm.com/offshore-construction/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No source found confirming first power had already occurred. The freshest official project construction timeline says Late 2025 – First power generated by the wind farm. Under the normalization rule for month/season-level timing, this is recorded as 01/11/2025 and should be read as a projected milestone, not a confirmed achieved date.


wind_farm_id: 6709
canonical_id: a3f24e57-0991-467d-bc89-d99ad9491e06
wind_farm_name: Sofia
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/07/2026
resolved_value: 01/07/2026
research_value: 01/07/2026
resolved_fact_id: 35287.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RWE first turbine press release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.rwe.com/en/press/rwe-offshore-wind-gmbh/2025-03-27-rwe-marks-first-turbine-installation-at-sofia-offshore-wind-farm/

research_summary:
No source found confirming full commissioning had already occurred. The freshest official dated source says Sofia is expected to be fully operational in the second half of 2026; normalized to 01/07/2026 under the rule for partial dates.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.rwe.com/en/press/rwe-offshore-wind-gmbh/2025-03-27-rwe-marks-first-turbine-installation-at-sofia-offshore-wind-farm/


wind_farm_id: 6710
canonical_id: f8d82159-8515-4790-8dcb-e9c498513c00
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank A
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Dogger Bank A; historic consent-stage name: Dogger Bank Creyke Beck A
research_value: Dogger Bank A; historic consent-stage name: Dogger Bank Creyke Beck A
citation_url: https://doggerbank.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Dogger-Bank-Final-Report-16-April-2025.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank 2025 history report
source_of_record_url: https://doggerbank.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Dogger-Bank-Final-Report-16-April-2025.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
This profile assesses the Dogger Bank A phase of the wider Dogger Bank offshore wind farm. SSE’s 10/10/2023 update identifies Dogger Bank A as one of three 1.2GW phases, while the Dogger Bank project site and 2025 project history report show the project was renamed from earlier consent-stage names, with Creyke Beck A becoming Dogger Bank A in 2017.


wind_farm_id: 6710
canonical_id: f8d82159-8515-4790-8dcb-e9c498513c00
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank A
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35288.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank project news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer / construction lead: SSE Renewables; current owners: SSE Renewables 40%, Equinor 40%, Vårgrønn 20%; operator on completion: Equinor

resolved_value:
Developer / construction lead: SSE Renewables; current owners: SSE Renewables 40%, Equinor 40%, Vårgrønn 20%; operator on completion: Equinor

citation_url:
https://doggerbank.com/project-news/vargronn-acquires-plenitudes-20-interest-in-the-worlds-largest-offshore-wind-farm/

research_summary:
The official Dogger Bank JV site states the project is a joint venture between SSE (40%), Equinor (40%) and Vårgrønn (20%), with SSE leading development and construction and Equinor operating on completion. Freshness: the official JV site is active in 2026, and SSE’s 04/02/2026 trading statement still treats Dogger Bank A as an SSE-led construction asset.

source_of_record_url:
https://doggerbank.com/project-news/vargronn-acquires-plenitudes-20-interest-in-the-worlds-largest-offshore-wind-farm/


wind_farm_id: 6710
canonical_id: f8d82159-8515-4790-8dcb-e9c498513c00
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank A
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SSE Renewables news release
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Forewind consortium developed the consent application; 2017 SSE and Equinor moved forward with Creyke Beck A as Dogger Bank A; 26/02/2021 Eni completed acquisition of 20% of Dogger Bank A and B; 17/10/2022 Vårgrønn acquired Plenitude’s 20% stake, giving today’s SSE 40% / Equinor 40% / Vårgrønn 20%

research_value:
Forewind consortium developed the consent application; 2017 SSE and Equinor moved forward with Creyke Beck A as Dogger Bank A; 26/02/2021 Eni completed acquisition of 20% of Dogger Bank A and B; 17/10/2022 Vårgrønn acquired Plenitude’s 20% stake, giving today’s SSE 40% / Equinor 40% / Vårgrønn 20%

citation_url:
https://www.sserenewables.com/news-and-views/2021/02/sse-renewables-completes-sell-down-of-dogger-bank-a-and-b/

research_summary:
The 2025 Dogger Bank history report says Forewind secured planning consent and that in 2017 SSE and Equinor continued with Creyke Beck A under the Dogger Bank name. SSE’s 26/02/2021 release confirms Eni entered A and B effective from financial close on 25/11/2020. The official Dogger Bank 17/10/2022 release confirms Vårgrønn acquired Plenitude’s 20% stake. Freshest dated source relied on for the current split is 17/10/2022 on the official JV site; no newer official source found that supersedes it.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.sserenewables.com/news-and-views/2021/02/sse-renewables-completes-sell-down-of-dogger-bank-a-and-b/


wind_farm_id: 6710
canonical_id: f8d82159-8515-4790-8dcb-e9c498513c00
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank A
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Under Construction
resolved_value: Under Construction
research_value: Under Construction
resolved_fact_id: 35289.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.sse.com/news-and-views/2026/02/sse-has-published-its-q3-trading-statement/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SSE Q3 Trading Statement
source_of_record_url: https://www.sse.com/news-and-views/2026/02/sse-has-published-its-q3-trading-statement/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Although Dogger Bank A achieved first power on 07/10/2023, newer official sources show construction and commissioning were still ongoing after that milestone. SSE’s FY 2024/25 results say Dogger Bank A remained on track for completion in the second half of 2025, and SSE’s 04/02/2026 trading statement says the 95th and final turbine was still awaiting installation and commissioning was expected to complete later in 2026. This fits the exact Boundary Layer label Under Construction.


wind_farm_id: 6710
canonical_id: f8d82159-8515-4790-8dcb-e9c498513c00
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank A
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1200 MW
resolved_value: 1200 MW
research_value: 1200 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35290.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://doggerbank.com/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank project site
source_of_record_url: https://doggerbank.com/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific official sources consistently describe Dogger Bank A as a 1.2GW phase. This aligns with the database validation context.


wind_farm_id: 6710
canonical_id: f8d82159-8515-4790-8dcb-e9c498513c00
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank A
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1200 MW
resolved_value: 1200 MW
research_value: 1200 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35291.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2015/1592/pdfs/uksi_20151592_en.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank Teesside A and B Offshore Wind Farm Order 2015
source_of_record_url: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2015/1592/pdfs/uksi_20151592_en.pdf
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence v3.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No clearly labelled public MEC value was found for Dogger Bank A specifically. The 2015 DCO authorises Work No. 1A with a gross electrical output capacity of up to 1.2GW, and project sources consistently describe each phase as 1.2GW. I therefore use 1200 MW as the closest project-specific export-capacity proxy, noting the DCO wording is gross output rather than explicitly “MEC”.


wind_farm_id: 6710
canonical_id: f8d82159-8515-4790-8dcb-e9c498513c00
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank A
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: GE Haliade-X 13 MW
resolved_value: GE Haliade-X 13 MW
research_value: GE Haliade-X 13 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35292.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SSE first power update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.sse.com/news-and-views/2023/10/world-s-largest-offshore-wind-farm-produces-power-for-the-first-time/

research_summary:
Project-specific official sources say the first turbine installed at Dogger Bank A was a GE Vernova Haliade-X 13MW turbine, and Dogger Bank project releases confirmed 190 13MW Haliade-X units for phases A and B, implying Dogger Bank A uses the 13MW variant.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.sse.com/news-and-views/2023/10/world-s-largest-offshore-wind-farm-produces-power-for-the-first-time/


wind_farm_id: 6710
canonical_id: f8d82159-8515-4790-8dcb-e9c498513c00
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank A
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: GE Vernova
resolved_value: GE Vernova
research_value: GE Vernova
resolved_fact_id: 35293.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SSE first power update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.sse.com/news-and-views/2023/10/world-s-largest-offshore-wind-farm-produces-power-for-the-first-time/

research_summary:
SSE’s first-power release names GE Vernova’s Haliade-X turbines at Dogger Bank A. Dogger Bank project announcements also identify GE Renewable Energy/GE as turbine supplier; GE Vernova is the current corporate name.


wind_farm_id: 6710
canonical_id: f8d82159-8515-4790-8dcb-e9c498513c00
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank A
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 13 MW
resolved_value: 13 MW
research_value: 13 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35294.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SSE first power update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
SSE’s Dogger Bank A first-power release explicitly says the first installed unit was a Haliade-X 13MW turbine. Earlier Dogger Bank project releases also said phases A and B would use 190 units of GE’s 13MW Haliade-X. A later decommissioning document contains older 12MW wording, but that conflicts with newer project-specific installation updates; the newer as-built evidence is more persuasive.


wind_farm_id: 6710
canonical_id: f8d82159-8515-4790-8dcb-e9c498513c00
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank A
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 220 m
resolved_value: 220 m
research_value: 220 m
resolved_fact_id: 35295.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://doggerbank.com/downloads/Dogger-Bank-A-and-B-Decommissioning-Programme.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank A and B Decommissioning Programme
source_of_record_url: https://doggerbank.com/downloads/Dogger-Bank-A-and-B-Decommissioning-Programme.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The Dogger Bank A and B decommissioning programme states Dogger Bank A and B will each comprise 95 offshore wind turbines with a rotor diameter of 220m. This is a project-specific official document. A second open corroboration on rotor diameter specifically for Dogger Bank A was not found from a stronger accessible source.


wind_farm_id: 6710
canonical_id: f8d82159-8515-4790-8dcb-e9c498513c00
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank A
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://doggerbank.com/downloads/Dogger-Bank-A-and-B-Decommissioning-Programme.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank A and B Decommissioning Programme
source_of_record_url: https://doggerbank.com/downloads/Dogger-Bank-A-and-B-Decommissioning-Programme.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
No project-specific accessible source found a Dogger Bank A hub height figure, and the project context states no linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata is available for fallback. Per instruction, this remains Not confirmed rather than inferred from generic Haliade-X literature or another site.


wind_farm_id: 6710
canonical_id: f8d82159-8515-4790-8dcb-e9c498513c00
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank A
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 95
resolved_value: 95
research_value: 95
resolved_fact_id: 35296.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://doggerbank.com/downloads/Dogger-Bank-A-and-B-Decommissioning-Programme.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank A and B Decommissioning Programme
source_of_record_url: https://doggerbank.com/downloads/Dogger-Bank-A-and-B-Decommissioning-Programme.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The strongest project-specific official source is the Dogger Bank A and B decommissioning programme, which states each of Dogger Bank A and B will comprise 95 turbines. SSE’s 04/02/2026 trading statement independently corroborates this by saying the 95th and final turbine at Dogger Bank A was pending installation. This does not align with the database validation hint of 100; the likely reason is an older/planned or non-phase-specific dataset value, whereas newer project-specific engineering/construction sources show the as-built phase count is 95.


wind_farm_id: 6710
canonical_id: f8d82159-8515-4790-8dcb-e9c498513c00
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank A
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile turbine foundations; offshore substation on jacket foundation with pin piles
resolved_value: Monopile turbine foundations; offshore substation on jacket foundation with pin piles
research_value: Monopile turbine foundations; offshore substation on jacket foundation with pin piles
resolved_fact_id: 35297.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://doggerbank.com/downloads/Dogger-Bank-A-and-B-Decommissioning-Programme.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank A and B Decommissioning Programme
source_of_record_url: https://doggerbank.com/downloads/Dogger-Bank-A-and-B-Decommissioning-Programme.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The project-specific decommissioning programme says Dogger Bank A and B turbines sit on monopile foundations and the offshore substation is on a jacket foundation with pin piles. The Dogger Bank offshore construction page also shows monopile foundation installation at Dogger Bank A.


wind_farm_id: 6710
canonical_id: f8d82159-8515-4790-8dcb-e9c498513c00
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank A
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 04/08/2015
resolved_value: 04/08/2015
research_value: 04/08/2015
resolved_fact_id: 35298.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK variation notice
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence v3.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dogger-bank-c-previously-known-as-dogger-bank-teesside-a-offshore-wind-farm-variation-2

research_summary:
GOV.UK’s marine licence variation notice states the Secretary of State granted consent for the Dogger Bank Teesside A and B Offshore Wind Farm Order 2015 on 04/08/2015. The official Dogger Bank consent library also carries the DCO as made in February 2015; 04/08/2015 is the clearer dated government statement tied to the operative order wording.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dogger-bank-c-previously-known-as-dogger-bank-teesside-a-offshore-wind-farm-variation-2


wind_farm_id: 6710
canonical_id: f8d82159-8515-4790-8dcb-e9c498513c00
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank A
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 26/11/2020
resolved_value: 26/11/2020
research_value: 26/11/2020
resolved_fact_id: 35299.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://doggerbank.com/press-releases/dogger-bank-wind-farm-a-and-b-reaches-financial-close/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank A and B financial close announcement
source_of_record_url: https://doggerbank.com/press-releases/dogger-bank-wind-farm-a-and-b-reaches-financial-close/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official project and partner sources use financial close on 26/11/2020 as the decisive investment milestone for Dogger Bank A and B. SSE’s 26/02/2021 note adds that project financing financial close was reached on 25/11/2020; because the public announcement of financial close is dated 26/11/2020, 26/11/2020 is used as the normalized FID date.


wind_farm_id: 6710
canonical_id: f8d82159-8515-4790-8dcb-e9c498513c00
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank A
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 07/10/2023
resolved_value: 07/10/2023
research_value: 07/10/2023
resolved_fact_id: 35300.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SSE first power update
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
SSE’s dated release says the first turbine at Dogger Bank A started turning and producing electricity at 8:37pm BST on Saturday 07/10/2023. The Dogger Bank project site’s first-power article corroborates the milestone.


wind_farm_id: 6710
canonical_id: f8d82159-8515-4790-8dcb-e9c498513c00
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank A
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://www.sse.com/news-and-views/2026/02/sse-has-published-its-q3-trading-statement/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: SSE Q3 Trading Statement
source_of_record_url: https://www.sse.com/news-and-views/2026/02/sse-has-published-its-q3-trading-statement/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Dogger Bank A has not yet reached a clearly evidenced full-commissioning date. SSE’s 04/02/2026 trading statement says commissioning was expected to complete later in calendar year 2026, while earlier SSE FY 2024/25 results had said completion was on track in the second half of 2025. As no source confirms full commissioning has actually occurred, the date remains Not confirmed.


wind_farm_id: 6711
canonical_id: 6d1f47fc-e18e-4a40-9dca-6ae3242a8d30
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank B
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Dogger Bank B
research_value: Dogger Bank B
citation_url: https://doggerbank.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Dogger-Bank-Final-Report-16-April-2025.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank economic impact report
source_of_record_url: https://doggerbank.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Dogger-Bank-Final-Report-16-April-2025.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The assessed asset is the phase now marketed as Dogger Bank B, one of the three Dogger Bank phases. Historic naming is important: the 2015 DCO covered “Dogger Bank Teesside A and B”, while the current project history states SSE and Equinor moved forward with Creyke Beck A, Creyke Beck B and Teesside A under the new Dogger Bank naming; Creyke Beck B became Dogger Bank B.


wind_farm_id: 6711
canonical_id: 6d1f47fc-e18e-4a40-9dca-6ae3242a8d30
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank B
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35301.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://doggerbank.com/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank project website
source_of_record_url: https://doggerbank.com/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer/construction lead: SSE Renewables; Current owners: SSE 40%, Equinor 40%, Vårgrønn 20%; Operator on completion: Equinor

resolved_value:
Developer/construction lead: SSE Renewables; Current owners: SSE 40%, Equinor 40%, Vårgrønn 20%; Operator on completion: Equinor

research_summary:
The freshest project-level source found is the Dogger Bank project website published/updated in April 2026, which confirms the current JV split as SSE 40%, Equinor 40%, Vårgrønn 20%, with SSE leading development/construction and Equinor operating on completion. SSE’s offshore portfolio page also supports that SSE is leading construction on behalf of Equinor and Vårgrønn.


wind_farm_id: 6711
canonical_id: 6d1f47fc-e18e-4a40-9dca-6ae3242a8d30
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank B
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank project news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Originally developed within Forewind; 26/11/2020 A and B reached financial close with SSE and Equinor; 01/02/2021-equivalent period Eni acquired 20% of A and B; 17/10/2022 Vårgrønn acquired Plenitude’s 20% stake, resulting in today’s 40/40/20 split

research_value:
Originally developed within Forewind; 26/11/2020 A and B reached financial close with SSE and Equinor; 01/02/2021-equivalent period Eni acquired 20% of A and B; 17/10/2022 Vårgrønn acquired Plenitude’s 20% stake, resulting in today’s 40/40/20 split

citation_url:
https://doggerbank.com/project-news/vargronn-acquires-plenitudes-20-interest-in-the-worlds-largest-offshore-wind-farm/

research_summary:
Ownership evolved from the original Forewind consortium to SSE/Equinor-led development. Financial close for A and B was announced on 26/11/2020. Eni entered A and B at 20% in late 2020/early 2021, then Dogger Bank’s 17/10/2022 project news states Vårgrønn acquired Plenitude’s 20% stake. The freshest source date relied on for the current ownership split is the Dogger Bank project website updated April 2026.


wind_farm_id: 6711
canonical_id: 6d1f47fc-e18e-4a40-9dca-6ae3242a8d30
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank B
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Under Construction
resolved_value: Under Construction
research_value: Under Construction
resolved_fact_id: 35302.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank B Weekly Notice of Operations 19/01/2026
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://doggerbank.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/LF600013-CST-DOG-NOT-0002-WNoO-Rev-146-19012026.pdf

research_summary:
Dogger Bank B is clearly in offshore construction rather than merely consented or pre-construction. Official 2024 and 2026 project notices confirm foundation installation and ongoing construction operations, and 2026 notices confirm a WTG installation campaign. This fits the Boundary Layer label Under Construction.

source_of_record_url:
https://doggerbank.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/LF600013-CST-DOG-NOT-0002-WNoO-Rev-146-19012026.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6711
canonical_id: 6d1f47fc-e18e-4a40-9dca-6ae3242a8d30
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank B
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1200 MW
resolved_value: 1200 MW
research_value: 1200 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35303.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank B Weekly Notice of Operations 19/01/2026
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://doggerbank.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/LF600013-CST-DOG-NOT-0002-WNoO-Rev-146-19012026.pdf

research_summary:
Multiple official sources describe Dogger Bank B as the second 1.2 GW phase. This matches the validation context capacity of 1200 MW.


wind_farm_id: 6711
canonical_id: 6d1f47fc-e18e-4a40-9dca-6ae3242a8d30
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank B
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 1200 MW
resolved_value: 1200 MW
research_value: 1200 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35304.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank construction news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://doggerbank.com/construction/second-hvdc-offshore-substation-platform-installed-at-dogger-bank-wind-farm/

research_summary:
Project-specific offshore/platform sources state Dogger Bank B’s HVDC platform will receive 1.2 GW of AC power from the phase’s turbines and convert it to DC for export ashore. I have treated this as the practical project export capacity/MEC for the phase; I did not find a separate explicit “MEC” label on an open official page.

source_of_record_url:
https://doggerbank.com/construction/second-hvdc-offshore-substation-platform-installed-at-dogger-bank-wind-farm/


wind_farm_id: 6711
canonical_id: 6d1f47fc-e18e-4a40-9dca-6ae3242a8d30
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank B
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: GE Haliade-X 13 MW
resolved_value: GE Haliade-X 13 MW
research_value: GE Haliade-X 13 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35305.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://doggerbank.com/construction/foundation-installation-campaign-begins-on-dogger-bank-b/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank construction news
source_of_record_url: https://doggerbank.com/construction/foundation-installation-campaign-begins-on-dogger-bank-b/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official Dogger Bank project sources confirm the first two phases use GE’s 13 MW Haliade-X turbines. The phase-B construction page refers to “GE Vernova’s groundbreaking 13MW Haliade-X turbines”, and the A/B financial close announcement states Dogger Bank Wind Farm “will be the first project to use … the 13MW GE Haliade-X.”


wind_farm_id: 6711
canonical_id: 6d1f47fc-e18e-4a40-9dca-6ae3242a8d30
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank B
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: GE Vernova (formerly GE Renewable Energy)
resolved_value: GE Vernova (formerly GE Renewable Energy)
research_value: GE Vernova (formerly GE Renewable Energy)
resolved_fact_id: 35306.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://doggerbank.com/construction/foundation-installation-campaign-begins-on-dogger-bank-b/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank construction news
source_of_record_url: https://doggerbank.com/construction/foundation-installation-campaign-begins-on-dogger-bank-b/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official Dogger Bank project sources identify GE as the turbine supplier for the first two phases, while newer phase-B construction news uses the current corporate branding GE Vernova. To preserve naming consistency with current branding while reflecting the historical supplier name, the OEM is recorded as GE Vernova (formerly GE Renewable Energy).


wind_farm_id: 6711
canonical_id: 6d1f47fc-e18e-4a40-9dca-6ae3242a8d30
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank B
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 13 MW
resolved_value: 13 MW
research_value: 13 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35307.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://doggerbank.com/construction/foundation-installation-campaign-begins-on-dogger-bank-b/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank construction news
source_of_record_url: https://doggerbank.com/construction/foundation-installation-campaign-begins-on-dogger-bank-b/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official Dogger Bank project sources directly state the first two phases use the 13 MW Haliade-X turbine, and Dogger Bank B construction news again refers to “13MW Haliade-X turbines.”


wind_farm_id: 6711
canonical_id: 6d1f47fc-e18e-4a40-9dca-6ae3242a8d30
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank B
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 220 m
resolved_value: 220 m
research_value: 220 m
resolved_fact_id: 35308.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://doggerbank.com/downloads/Dogger-Bank-A-and-B-Decommissioning-Programme.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank A & B Decommissioning Programme
source_of_record_url: https://doggerbank.com/downloads/Dogger-Bank-A-and-B-Decommissioning-Programme.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
The Dogger Bank A & B decommissioning programme is a project-specific official document for A and B and states each phase will comprise 95 turbines with a rotor diameter of 220 m. This is the strongest accessible project-tied source found.


wind_farm_id: 6711
canonical_id: 6d1f47fc-e18e-4a40-9dca-6ae3242a8d30
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank B
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
citation_url: https://doggerbank.com/downloads/Dogger-Bank-A-and-B-Decommissioning-Programme.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank A & B Decommissioning Programme
source_of_record_url: https://doggerbank.com/downloads/Dogger-Bank-A-and-B-Decommissioning-Programme.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I found project-specific confirmation of tip height and rotor diameter, but not an explicit phase-specific hub height for Dogger Bank B from official accessible sources. Per instruction, this is left as Not confirmed rather than inferred from the turbine platform.


wind_farm_id: 6711
canonical_id: 6d1f47fc-e18e-4a40-9dca-6ae3242a8d30
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank B
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 95
resolved_value: 95
research_value: 95
resolved_fact_id: 35309.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank construction news
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://doggerbank.com/construction/second-hvdc-offshore-substation-platform-installed-at-dogger-bank-wind-farm/

research_summary:
Current project-specific web evidence points to 95 turbines for Dogger Bank B, not 100. Official 2024 platform/foundation news says Dogger Bank B’s platform will receive power from 95 turbines, and the A & B decommissioning programme also states each of A and B will comprise 95 offshore wind turbines. This differs from the database validation hint of 100; the likely reason is that the database value is an outdated or generalized phase count, while project delivery documentation reflects the as-built/detailed-design configuration.


wind_farm_id: 6711
canonical_id: 6d1f47fc-e18e-4a40-9dca-6ae3242a8d30
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank B
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile turbine foundations; offshore HVDC platform on jacket foundation
resolved_value: Monopile turbine foundations; offshore HVDC platform on jacket foundation
research_value: Monopile turbine foundations; offshore HVDC platform on jacket foundation
resolved_fact_id: 35310.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://doggerbank.com/construction/foundation-installation-campaign-begins-on-dogger-bank-b/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank construction news
source_of_record_url: https://doggerbank.com/construction/foundation-installation-campaign-begins-on-dogger-bank-b/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
For the wind turbines themselves, official Dogger Bank B construction news says monopile foundations and transition pieces are being installed. The A & B decommissioning programme also states each turbine will be installed on a monopile foundation, while the offshore substation uses a jacket foundation.


wind_farm_id: 6711
canonical_id: 6d1f47fc-e18e-4a40-9dca-6ae3242a8d30
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank B
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 04/08/2015
resolved_value: 04/08/2015
research_value: 04/08/2015
resolved_fact_id: 35311.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank Teesside A and B Offshore Wind Farm Order 2015
source_of_record_licence: Open Government/public sector terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010051-002091-Development%20Consent%20Order%20as%20made%20by%20the%20Secretary%20of%20State%20for%20Energy%20and%20Climate%20Change.pdf

research_summary:
The made date of the DCO is 04/08/2015. Because the project history and order both indicate consent was granted by the 2015 Order, I use the order-made date as the consent date.

source_of_record_url:
https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010051-002091-Development%20Consent%20Order%20as%20made%20by%20the%20Secretary%20of%20State%20for%20Energy%20and%20Climate%20Change.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6711
canonical_id: 6d1f47fc-e18e-4a40-9dca-6ae3242a8d30
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank B
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 26/11/2020
resolved_value: 26/11/2020
research_value: 26/11/2020
resolved_fact_id: 35312.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://doggerbank.com/press-releases/dogger-bank-wind-farm-a-and-b-reaches-financial-close/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank financial close announcement
source_of_record_url: https://doggerbank.com/press-releases/dogger-bank-wind-farm-a-and-b-reaches-financial-close/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Dogger Bank’s official announcement says A and B reached financial close on 26/11/2020. In practice this is the clearest accessible proxy for FID for the phase pair A and B, and is widely treated as the investment commitment milestone.


wind_farm_id: 6711
canonical_id: 6d1f47fc-e18e-4a40-9dca-6ae3242a8d30
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank B
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/01/2025
resolved_value: 01/01/2025
research_value: 01/01/2025
resolved_fact_id: 35313.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://doggerbank.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Dogger-Bank-Final-Report-16-April-2025.pdf
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank economic impact report
source_of_record_url: https://doggerbank.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Dogger-Bank-Final-Report-16-April-2025.pdf
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
I did not find a dated official project page explicitly announcing Dogger Bank B first power yet. However, a 2025 independent report hosted on the official Dogger Bank site states “Dogger Bank B will begin producing power in 2025,” so using the user’s normalization rule for year-only evidence, this is recorded as 01/01/2025 and should be treated as year-level only, not a precise commissioning day.


wind_farm_id: 6711
canonical_id: 6d1f47fc-e18e-4a40-9dca-6ae3242a8d30
wind_farm_name: Dogger Bank B
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/01/2026
resolved_value: 01/01/2026
research_value: 01/01/2026
resolved_fact_id: 35314.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://doggerbank.com/press-releases/dogger-bank-wind-farm-a-and-b-reaches-financial-close/
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Dogger Bank financial close announcement
source_of_record_url: https://doggerbank.com/press-releases/dogger-bank-wind-farm-a-and-b-reaches-financial-close/
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Official and quasi-official project sources indicate Dogger Bank B commercial operations / completion in 2026. As no exact day was confirmed, I normalize year-only evidence to 01/01/2026.


wind_farm_id: 6713
canonical_id: 00f18052-36b4-4594-ba12-7fc5c1f21c3d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (East)
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cefas chemicals in offshore wind farms report
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Hornsea 1 (East); alternative/historic parent project name: Hornsea Project One / Hornsea One East / Hornsea 1C

research_value:
Hornsea 1 (East); alternative/historic parent project name: Hornsea Project One / Hornsea One East / Hornsea 1C

citation_url:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1080686/Cefas_2022_Chemicals_in_Offshore_Wind_Farms.pdf

research_summary:
The phase sits within the three-part Hornsea One build-out. Ofgem’s ex-post review says Hornsea One is subdivided into West, Central and East substation areas, while the ESO technical report says the wind farm consists of three phases of about 400 MW each. The project-level public name remains Hornsea Project One / Hornsea One.

source_of_record_url:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1080686/Cefas_2022_Chemicals_in_Offshore_Wind_Farms.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6713
canonical_id: 00f18052-36b4-4594-ba12-7fc5c1f21c3d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (East)
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35315.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2021/03/481512824704809
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted transmission-assets sale announcement
source_of_record_url: https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2021/03/481512824704809
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: Ørsted (formerly DONG Energy). Current owners: Ørsted 50%, Global Infrastructure Partners 50%. Operator: Ørsted

resolved_value:
Developer: Ørsted (formerly DONG Energy). Current owners: Ørsted 50%, Global Infrastructure Partners 50%. Operator: Ørsted

research_summary:
Freshest dated ownership source used: Ørsted’s Hornsea One project summary (published 01/09/2020) still states 50% Ørsted / 50% GIP ownership, and the 26/03/2021 transmission-assets sale announcement repeats the same JV split. Historic development ownership changed when DONG/Ørsted acquired full ownership in 2015 before later selling 50% to GIP in 2018.


wind_farm_id: 6713
canonical_id: 00f18052-36b4-4594-ba12-7fc5c1f21c3d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (East)
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
citation_url: https://orsted.com/en/company-announcement-list/2018/11/1850875
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted completes divestment of 50% of Hornsea 1 Offshore Wind Farm
source_of_record_url: https://orsted.com/en/company-announcement-list/2018/11/1850875
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
01/02/2015: DONG Energy took full ownership of Hornsea Project One development; 26/11/2018: Ørsted completed sale of 50% to GIP; current split remains Ørsted 50% / GIP 50%

research_value:
01/02/2015: DONG Energy took full ownership of Hornsea Project One development; 26/11/2018: Ørsted completed sale of 50% to GIP; current split remains Ørsted 50% / GIP 50%

research_summary:
Freshest dated source relied on for current split is the 26/03/2021 Ørsted announcement, which states Hornsea 1 Limited is owned by Ørsted (50%) and GIP (50%). For history, Ørsted records DONG taking full ownership on 04/02/2015, then completing the 50% sale to GIP on 26/11/2018.


wind_farm_id: 6713
canonical_id: 00f18052-36b4-4594-ba12-7fc5c1f21c3d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (East)
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 35316.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted Hornsea One project summary
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://cdn.orsted.com/-/media/www/docs/corp/uk/updated-project-summaries-06-19/sept-2020/200819_ps_hornsea-one_v3_web-aw.pdf

research_summary:
Hornsea 1 (East) appears in the Cefas offshore wind inventory as a separate row but with status shown as authorised, which conflicts with project-level evidence. Because Hornsea One as a whole is fully built and operating, and the East sub-area is one of its three built substation/phase areas, the closest exact Boundary Layer status is Operational.

source_of_record_url:
https://cdn.orsted.com/-/media/www/docs/corp/uk/updated-project-summaries-06-19/sept-2020/200819_ps_hornsea-one_v3_web-aw.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6713
canonical_id: 00f18052-36b4-4594-ba12-7fc5c1f21c3d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (East)
row_key: capacity_mw
row_order: 5
field_label: Capacity
field_name: capacity_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 406 MW
resolved_value: 406 MW
research_value: 406 MW
resolved_fact_id: 35317.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cefas chemicals in offshore wind farms report
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1080686/Cefas_2022_Chemicals_in_Offshore_Wind_Farms.pdf

research_summary:
The repaired source-of-record evidence is the openly accessible Cefas page extract for Hornsea 1 (East), which explicitly shows Capacity 406 for that row. This also remains internally consistent with 58 turbines at 7 MW each and with the three-phase subdivision context for Hornsea One.


wind_farm_id: 6713
canonical_id: 00f18052-36b4-4594-ba12-7fc5c1f21c3d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (East)
row_key: mec_mw
row_order: 6
field_label: Maximum Export Capacity (MEC)
field_name: mec_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Not confirmed
research_value: Not confirmed
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ofgem ex-post review of Hornsea transmission assets
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/docs/2021/03/hornsea_offshore_wind_farm_transmission_assets_ex_post_review_11112020_non_confidential.pdf

research_summary:
Public sources reviewed clearly confirm installed capacity for the East phase and the full Hornsea One project, but no openly accessible source found during this research explicitly states a separate MEC for the East sub-area. To avoid conflating installed capacity with export capacity, this remains not confirmed.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/docs/2021/03/hornsea_offshore_wind_farm_transmission_assets_ex_post_review_11112020_non_confidential.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6713
canonical_id: 00f18052-36b4-4594-ba12-7fc5c1f21c3d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (East)
row_key: turbine_model
row_order: 7
field_label: Turbine model
field_name: turbine_model
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens Gamesa SWT-7.0-154
resolved_value: Siemens Gamesa SWT-7.0-154
research_value: Siemens Gamesa SWT-7.0-154
resolved_fact_id: 35318.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-level web sources confirm Hornsea One uses Siemens Gamesa 7 MW turbines, but accessible project-specific web pages reviewed did not clearly state the exact model variant for the East phase separately. Per the required fallback rule, the linked EuroWindWakes project-turbine metadata value SWT-7.0-154 is used.


wind_farm_id: 6713
canonical_id: 00f18052-36b4-4594-ba12-7fc5c1f21c3d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (East)
row_key: turbine_oem
row_order: 8
field_label: Turbine manufacturer (OEM)
field_name: turbine_oem
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Siemens Gamesa
resolved_value: Siemens Gamesa
research_value: Siemens Gamesa
resolved_fact_id: 9139.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Ørsted first power announcement
research_source_type: official project announcement
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web evidence for Hornsea One states the wind farm consists of Siemens Gamesa 7 MW turbines. This is also consistent with the linked EuroWindWakes metadata for the East phase.

research_source_url:
https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2019/02/the-worlds-biggest-offshore-wind-farm-hornsea-one-generates-first-power


wind_farm_id: 6713
canonical_id: 00f18052-36b4-4594-ba12-7fc5c1f21c3d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (East)
row_key: rated_power_mw
row_order: 9
field_label: Individual rated power
field_name: rated_power_mw
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 7
resolved_value: 7
research_value: 7 MW
resolved_fact_id: 9449.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Ørsted first power announcement
research_source_type: official project announcement
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Hornsea One project sources state 174 offshore wind turbines rated at 7 MW each. Applying that across the East phase is consistent with the split 406 MW / 58 turbines and with the linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata.

research_source_url:
https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2019/02/the-worlds-biggest-offshore-wind-farm-hornsea-one-generates-first-power


wind_farm_id: 6713
canonical_id: 00f18052-36b4-4594-ba12-7fc5c1f21c3d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (East)
row_key: rotor_diameter_m
row_order: 10
field_label: Rotor diameter
field_name: rotor_diameter_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 154
resolved_value: 154
research_value: 154 m
resolved_fact_id: 9604.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
The exact rotor diameter was not found on an accessible project-phase-specific web page for Hornsea 1 (East). Under the required fallback rule, the linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata value 154 m is used; it matches the SWT-7.0-154 designation and is consistent with Siemens Gamesa references describing Hornsea One’s 7 MW platform predecessor to the 8 MW / 167 m model.


wind_farm_id: 6713
canonical_id: 00f18052-36b4-4594-ba12-7fc5c1f21c3d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (East)
row_key: hub_height_m
row_order: 11
field_label: Hub height
field_name: hub_height_m
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 115
resolved_value: 115
research_value: 115 m
resolved_fact_id: 9759.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: EuroWindWakes 2025 linked turbine dataset
research_source_type: open dataset
research_source_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_source_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
research_summary:
No accessible project-specific web source reviewed gave a clearly phase-tied hub height for Hornsea 1 (East). Per the required fallback rule, the linked EuroWindWakes turbine metadata value 115 m is used.


wind_farm_id: 6713
canonical_id: 00f18052-36b4-4594-ba12-7fc5c1f21c3d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (East)
row_key: turbine_count
row_order: 12
field_label: Total turbine count
field_name: turbine_count
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 58
resolved_value: 58
research_value: 58
resolved_fact_id: 47144.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: Calculated from 58 linked EuroWindWakes turbine locations
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Cefas chemicals in offshore wind farms report
research_source_type: government/open dataset report
research_source_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 1
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: aligned
validation_basis: research
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Cefas lists Hornsea 1 (East) ... 58 ... Capacity 406 and WindMap also lists 58 turbines for Hornsea 1 (East). This matches all non-web validation signals provided in context, including the 58 linked EuroWindWakes turbines and EMODnet hint.


wind_farm_id: 6713
canonical_id: 00f18052-36b4-4594-ba12-7fc5c1f21c3d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (East)
row_key: foundation_type
row_order: 13
field_label: Foundations
field_name: foundation_type
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Monopile
resolved_value: Monopile
research_value: Monopile
resolved_fact_id: 35324.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cefas chemicals in offshore wind farms report
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
For the East phase specifically, Cefas lists Hornsea 1 (East) ... monopile. Project-level Ørsted material also states Hornsea One installed monopile foundations and later planning material refers to Hornsea Project One adding 174 ... monopile foundations.


wind_farm_id: 6713
canonical_id: 00f18052-36b4-4594-ba12-7fc5c1f21c3d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (East)
row_key: consent_date
row_order: 14
field_label: Consent date
field_name: consent_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 10/12/2014
resolved_value: 10/12/2014
research_value: 10/12/2014
resolved_fact_id: 35325.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hornsea-one-offshore-wind-farm-variation-request
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: GOV.UK Hornsea One variation request page
source_of_record_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hornsea-one-offshore-wind-farm-variation-request
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Government sources consistently state the Hornsea One Development Consent Order was granted on 10 December 2014. No separate public consent date for the East sub-area was identified; the East phase forms part of the consented Hornsea Project One.


wind_farm_id: 6713
canonical_id: 00f18052-36b4-4594-ba12-7fc5c1f21c3d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (East)
row_key: fid_date
row_order: 15
field_label: Final investment decision (FID)
field_name: fid_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 01/01/2016
resolved_value: 01/01/2016
research_value: 01/01/2016
resolved_fact_id: 35326.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: RPS Hornsea Project One support article
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://www.rpsgroup.com/about-us/news/hornsea-project-one-world-s-largest-offshore-wind-farm-to-be-built/

research_summary:
A precise dated Hornsea One FID page was not readily accessible in the reviewed open sources, but RPS states DONG Energy’s investment decision to build Hornsea Project One and Siemens Gamesa’s Hornsea Two release says the Hornsea Two turbine order kicked off the new project while Hornsea One was already under construction. Using year-only confirmation for Hornsea One FID, this is normalised to 01/01/2016.

source_of_record_url:
https://www.rpsgroup.com/about-us/news/hornsea-project-one-world-s-largest-offshore-wind-farm-to-be-built/


wind_farm_id: 6713
canonical_id: 00f18052-36b4-4594-ba12-7fc5c1f21c3d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (East)
row_key: first_power_date
row_order: 16
field_label: First power date
field_name: first_power_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 15/02/2019
resolved_value: 15/02/2019
research_value: 15/02/2019
resolved_fact_id: 35327.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted first power announcement
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
citation_url:
https://orsted.com/en/media/news/2019/02/the-worlds-biggest-offshore-wind-farm-hornsea-one-generates-first-power

research_summary:
Ørsted’s dated news release says Hornsea 1 generates first power on 15 February 2019. This is a project-level milestone; no separate East-only first-power date was identified in open sources.


wind_farm_id: 6713
canonical_id: 00f18052-36b4-4594-ba12-7fc5c1f21c3d
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (East)
row_key: commissioning_date
row_order: 17
field_label: Full commissioning date
field_name: commissioning_date
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: 2019-12-01
resolved_value: 2019-12-01
research_value: 01/01/2020
resolved_fact_id: 9914.0
resolved_source_type: eurowindwakes
resolved_source_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
resolved_source_detail: EuroWindWakes Dec 2025
citation_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Open European offshore wind turbine database
source_of_record_type: open dataset
source_of_record_url: https://zenodo.org/records/17311571
source_of_record_licence: ODC Open Database License v1.0
research_source_name: Ørsted Hornsea One project summary
research_source_type: official project summary
research_source_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: research_differs
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
research_summary:
Ørsted’s project summary states 2020 Fully operational and the company’s H1 2020 report refers to Hornsea 1 contributing as an offshore wind farm in operation. Because reviewed sources confirm year-level rather than a single day for full commissioning, the table uses 01/01/2020 per the normalization rule.

research_source_url:
https://cdn.orsted.com/-/media/www/docs/corp/uk/updated-project-summaries-06-19/sept-2020/200819_ps_hornsea-one_v3_web-aw.pdf


wind_farm_id: 6714
canonical_id: 282ba829-8eaa-40e3-a01a-e8fb1f40758c
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (West)
row_key: project_identity
row_order: 1
field_label: Project identity
is_primary_layer_field: 0
display_value: Hornsea 1 (West); part of Hornsea Project One / Hornsea One Offshore Wind Farm
research_value: Hornsea 1 (West); part of Hornsea Project One / Hornsea One Offshore Wind Farm
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Cefas 2022 Chemicals in Offshore Wind Farms
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Phase/name ambiguity resolved first: public project/regulatory sources mainly describe the full Hornsea One / Hornsea Project One development, while open UK environmental/regulatory material and open project lists separately identify Hornsea 1 (West) as one of three 406 MW sub-areas alongside East and Centre.


wind_farm_id: 6714
canonical_id: 282ba829-8eaa-40e3-a01a-e8fb1f40758c
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (West)
row_key: developer
row_order: 2
field_label: Developer / owners
field_name: developer
is_primary_layer_field: 1
resolved_fact_id: 35387.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://orsted.co.uk/energy-solutions/offshore-wind/our-wind-farms/hornsea1
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted Hornsea 1 project page
source_of_record_url: https://orsted.co.uk/energy-solutions/offshore-wind/our-wind-farms/hornsea1
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Developer: SMart Wind / DONG Energy (now Ørsted) for Hornsea Project One; current generating-asset owners for Hornsea One shown by Ørsted as Ørsted 50% plus partners Greencoat, TRIG & Equitix, GLIL & Octopus Renewables; operator: Ørsted

resolved_value:
Developer: SMart Wind / DONG Energy (now Ørsted) for Hornsea Project One; current generating-asset owners for Hornsea One shown by Ørsted as Ørsted 50% plus partners Greencoat, TRIG & Equitix, GLIL & Octopus Renewables; operator: Ørsted

research_summary:
The western block is not presented on the web as a separately owned SPV from the rest of Hornsea One. Freshest ownership source relied on: Ørsted Hornsea 1 portfolio page crawled last month states Hornsea 1 is owned by Ørsted (50%) as well as partners Greencoat, TRIG & Equitix, GLIL & Octopus Renewables and that it is operated and maintained from Grimsby. Planning Inspectorate records show the original promoter for Project One was SMart Wind Ltd; older Ørsted and Ofgem material show the earlier Ørsted/GIP JV structure before later sell-downs. Exact percentage split among the minority partners was not confirmed from an open reconciled official JV page, so only Ørsted’s 50% is stated with certainty.


wind_farm_id: 6714
canonical_id: 282ba829-8eaa-40e3-a01a-e8fb1f40758c
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (West)
row_key: ownership_history
row_order: 3
field_label: Ownership history
is_primary_layer_field: 0
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: Ørsted agreement for the sale of Hornsea 1 transmission assets
source_of_record_licence: public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
display_value:
Originally developed as Hornsea Offshore Wind Farm (Zone 4) – Project One by SMart Wind / DONG Energy; generating assets later held by Ørsted and GIP 50:50 JV; more recent Ørsted page shows Ørsted 50% plus partners Greencoat, TRIG & Equitix, GLIL & Octopus Renewables; transmission assets sold to Diamond Transmission Partners in 2021

research_value:
Originally developed as Hornsea Offshore Wind Farm (Zone 4) – Project One by SMart Wind / DONG Energy; generating assets later held by Ørsted and GIP 50:50 JV; more recent Ørsted page shows Ørsted 50% plus partners Greencoat, TRIG & Equitix, GLIL & Octopus Renewables; transmission assets sold to Diamond Transmission Partners in 2021

citation_url:
https://orsted.co.uk/media/newsroom/news/2021/03/agreement-for-the-sale-of-hornsea-1-transmission-assets

research_summary:
Freshest source date relied on for current ownership context is the Ørsted Hornsea 1 page crawled last month. Older dated official sources show the sequence: the Project One promoter was SMart Wind Ltd in the DCO process; in 04/03/2021 Ørsted announced Hornsea 1 Ltd was owned by Ørsted (50%) and GIP (50%) when agreeing the OFTO sale; Ofgem confirmed the transmission licence award to Diamond Transmission Partners on the same date.

source_of_record_url:
https://orsted.co.uk/media/newsroom/news/2021/03/agreement-for-the-sale-of-hornsea-1-transmission-assets


wind_farm_id: 6714
canonical_id: 282ba829-8eaa-40e3-a01a-e8fb1f40758c
wind_farm_name: Hornsea 1 (West)
row_key: status
row_order: 4
field_label: Status
field_name: status
is_primary_layer_field: 1
display_value: Operational
resolved_value: Operational
research_value: Operational
resolved_fact_id: 35388.0
resolved_source_type: research
resolved_source_name: Research
resolved_source_detail: AI research Apr 2026
citation_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hornsea-one-offshore-wind-farm-variation-4
research_status: available
source_of_record_name: MMO Hornsea One Offshore Wind Farm – Variation 4
source_of_record_url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hornsea-one-offshore-wind-farm-variation-4
source_of_record_licence: Open Government Licence / public webpage terms
cross_validated: 0
confirmation_count: 0
pending_correction_count: 0
review_state: unreviewed
validation_basis: single_source
community_approved_note_count: 0
community_correction_count: 0
community_update_count: 0
community_total_upvotes: 0
community_has_promoted_fact: 0
community_supports_resolved_value: 0
community_disputes_resolved_value: 0
research_summary:
Project-specific web sources describe the full Hornsea One project as complete and operational; the West block is listed separately in open datasets but forms part of that built project. Cefas’ 2022 table labels Hornsea 1 (West) “authorised”, but that appears stale against later official project/regulatory sources stating Hornsea One construction was complete and operational in 2019. Closest Boundary Layer label is therefore Operational.


